Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

Brain imaging

Embracing the heterogeneity in depression neuroimaging

Unipolar depression is a common mental disorder that is increasingly treated with neuroimaging-guided therapeutics. Cash et al. use brain connectomics in 57 heterogeneous neuroimaging studies to report meta-analytic brain networks linked to aberrant emotional and cognitive processing in individuals with unipolar depression.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Heterogeneous neuroimaging findings converge to brain networks related to aberrant emotional and cognitive processing in unipolar depression.

References

  1. Marek, S. et al. Nature 603, 654–660 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Müller, V. I. et al. JAMA Psychiatry 74, 47–55 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Cash, R. F. H., Müller, V. I., Fitzgerald, P. B., Eickhoff, S. B. & Zalesky, A. Nat. Mental Health 1, 174–185 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Taylor, J. J. et al. Nat. Hum. Behav. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-022-01501-9 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Siddiqi, S. H. et al. Nat. Hum. Behav. 5, 1707–1716 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Siddiqi, S. H. et al. Am. J. Psychiatry 177, 435–446 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Siddiqi, S. H. et al. J. Neurotrauma 36, 1361–1374 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Cash, R. F. H. et al. Biol. Psychiatry 90, 689–700 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Elbau, I. G. et al. Am. J. Psychiatry 180, 230–240 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Siddiqi, S. H., Weigand, A., Pascual-Leone, A. & Fox, M. D. Biol. Psychiatry 90, e55–e56 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Frade, C. H., Wilson, S. E., Beckwith, A. & Powers, W. J. JAMA Netw. Open 5, e2219416 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Debby C. W. Klooster.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

D.C.W.K. declares no competing interests. S.H.S. is a scientific consultant for Magnus Medical and a clinical consultant for Acacia Mental Health, Kaizen Brain Center, and Boston Precision Neurotherapeutics. S.H.S. has received investigator-initiated research funding from Neuronetics. S.H.S. has served as a speaker for Brainsway and PsychU.org (unbranded, sponsored by Otsuka). S.H.S. owns intellectual property involving the use of functional connectivity to target TMS.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Klooster, D.C.W., Siddiqi, S.H. Embracing the heterogeneity in depression neuroimaging. Nat. Mental Health 1, 243–244 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44220-023-00047-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44220-023-00047-7

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing