Abstract
Wedderburn–Etherington number patterns, which have inherent combinatorial rules, are ubiquitous in natural tree-like systems and are of significance for studying the assembly of single particles into branched superstructures. However, implementing these patterns at the micro- or nanoscale is still challenging. By controlling the sequential fusion of nanodroplets, these patterns can be reproduced in nanometre-sized branched mesoporous silica structures. Anisotropic mesoporous silica nanoparticles, possessing exposed reaction-active droplet surfaces, are initially synthesized and then assembled following Wedderburn–Etherington number patterns (1, 1, 1, 2, 3, 6, 11, and so on), forming branched nanotrees containing dimers to multimers. This assembly is achieved by using ligand-grafted palladium nanocrystals as an adhesive, which can fuse the droplets exposed on one side of the preformed nanoparticles. The formed dimers have a Y-shaped architecture with two fused branches (length, ∼395 nm; outer diameter, ∼157 nm) connected by an open tube that grows later, and the sequential fusion-growth style can further extend the Y-structure to multibranched structures. Statistics can predict the degree of branching at each assembly level. The types and configurations of branched structural isomers can also be calculated precisely and are specified by the Wedderburn–Etherington trees.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and the associated Supplementary Information Section. Source data are provided with this paper.
References
Enquist, B. J. & Niklas, K. J. Global allocation rules for patterns of biomass partitioning in seed plants. Science 295, 1517–1520 (2002).
Klar, A. Plant mathematics: Fibonacci’s flowers. Nature 417, 595 (2002).
Eloy, C. et al. Wind loads and competition for light sculpt trees into self-similar structures. Nat. Commun. 8, 1014 (2017).
Hu, Y. & Kane, C. L. Fibonacci topological superconductor. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 066801 (2018).
Li, C., Zhang, X. & Cao, Z. Triangular and Fibonacci number patterns driven by stress on core/shell microstructures. Science 309, 909–911 (2005).
West, G., Brown, J. & Enquist, B. A. A general model for the structure and allometry of plant vascular systems. Nature 400, 664–667 (1999).
McCulloh, K., Sperry, J. & Adler, F. Water transport in plants obeys Murray’s law. Nature 421, 939–942 (2003).
Yu, B. & Li, B. Fractal-like tree networks reducing the thermal conductivity. Phys. Rev. E 73, 066302 (2006).
Ryoo, R. et al. Rare-earth–platinum alloy nanoparticles in mesoporous zeolite for catalysis. Nature 585, 221–224 (2020).
Gröschel, A. et al. Guided hierarchical co-assembly of soft patchy nanoparticles. Nature 503, 247–251 (2013).
Li, F. et al. Site-specific functionalization of anisotropic nanoparticles: from colloidal atoms to colloidal molecules. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 18548–18555 (2009).
Verstraete, L. & De Feyter, S. 2D Self-assembled molecular networks and on-surface reactivity under nanoscale lateral confinement. Chem. Soc. Rev. 50, 5884–5897 (2021).
Auyeung, E. et al. DNA-mediated nanoparticle crystallization into Wulff polyhedral. Nature 505, 73–77 (2014).
Mann, S. Self-assembly and transformation of hybrid nano-objects and nanostructures under equilibrium and non-equilibrium conditions. Nat. Mater. 8, 781–792 (2009).
Liu, K. et al. Step-growth polymerization of inorganic nanoparticles. Science 329, 197–200 (2010).
Ma, Y. et al. Streamlined mesoporous silica nanoparticles with tunable curvature from interfacial dynamic-migration strategy for nanomotors. Nano Lett. 21, 6071–6079 (2021).
Shevchenko, E. V. et al. Structural diversity in binary nanoparticle superlattices. Nature 439, 55–59 (2006).
Tang, Z. et al. Self-assembly of CdTe nanocrystals into free-floating sheets. Science 314, 274–278 (2006).
Maye, M. M. et al. Stepwise surface encoding for high-throughput assembly of nanoclusters. Nat. Mater. 8, 388–391 (2009).
Nie, Z., Petukhova, A. & Kumacheva, E. Properties and emerging applications of self-assembled structures made from inorganic nanoparticles. Nat. Nanotechnol. 5, 15–25 (2010).
Ma, Y. et al. Remodeling nanodroplets into hierarchical mesoporous silica nanoreactors with multiple chambers. Nat. Commun. 13, 6136 (2022).
Segawa, Y. et al. Synthesis of a Möbius carbon nanobelt. Nat. Synth. 1, 535–541 (2022).
Woods, J. F. et al. Shape-assisted self-assembly. Nat. Commun. 13, 3681 (2022).
Park, S. Y. et al. DNA-programmable nanoparticle crystallization. Nature 451, 553–556 (2008).
Singh, G. et al. Self-assembly of magnetite nanocubes into helical superstructures. Science 345, 1149–1153 (2014).
Erb, R. M. et al. Magnetic assembly of colloidal superstructures with multipole symmetry. Nature 457, 999–10002 (2009).
Suteewong, T. et al. Multicompartment mesoporous silica nanoparticles with branched shapes: an epitaxial growth mechanism. Science 3, 337–341 (2013).
Wang, T. et al. Self-assembled colloidal superparticles from nanorods. Science 338, 358–363 (2012).
Jun, K. & Jacobson, J. M. Programmable growth of branched silicon nanowires using a focused ion beam. Nano Lett. 10, 2777–2782 (2010).
Bandaru, P. et al. Novel electrical switching behaviour and logic in carbon nanotube Y-junctions. Nat. Mater. 4, 663–666 (2005).
Cui, Y., Zhu, H., Cai, J. & Qiu, H. Self-regulated co-assembly of soft and hard nanoparticles. Nat. Commun. 12, 5682 (2021).
Nie, Z. et al. Self-assembly of metal–polymer analogues of amphiphilic triblock copolymers. Nat. Mater. 6, 609–614 (2007).
McMullen, A. et al. Self-assembly of emulsion droplets through programmable folding. Nature 610, 502–506 (2022).
Miszta, K. et al. Hierarchical self-assembly of suspended branched colloidal nanocrystals into superlattice structures. Nat. Mater. 10, 872–876 (2011).
Manna, L. et al. Controlled growth of tetrapod-branched inorganic nanocrystals. Nat. Mater. 2, 382–385 (2003).
Zhao, T. et al. Surface-kinetics mediated mesoporous multipods for enhanced bacterial adhesion and inhibition. Nat. Commun. 10, 4387 (2019).
Wang, J. et al. Physical activation of innate immunity by spiky particles. Nat. Nanotechnol. 13, 1078–1086 (2018).
Bóna, M. & Flajolet, P. Isomorphism and symmetries in random phylogenetic trees. J. Appl. Probab. 46, 1005–1019 (2009).
Cyvin, S. J., Brunvoll, J. & Cyvin, B. N. Enumeration of constitutional isomers of polyenes. J. Mol. Struct. Theochem. 357, 255–261 (1995).
Cyvin, S. J. et al. Enumeration of polyene hydrocarbons: a complete mathematical solution. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 35, 743–751 (1995).
Wang, Y. et al. Colloids with valence and specific directional bonding. Nature 491, 51–55 (2012).
Chen, G. et al. Regioselective surface encoding of nanoparticles for programmable self-assembly. Nat. Mater. 18, 169–174 (2019).
Lekkerkerker, H. N. & Tuinier, R. Colloids and the Depletion Interaction, 1st edn, Vol. XIV, 234 (Springer, 2011). .
Han, F. et al. On demand synthesis of hollow fullerene nanostructures. Nat. Commun. 10, 1548 (2019).
Han, F. et al. Precise dimerization of hollow fullerene compartments. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 15396–15402 (2020).
Aubert, T. et al. Two-dimensional superstructures of silica cages. Adv. Mater. 32, 1908362 (2020).
Kim, S. et al. Synthesis of monodisperse palladium nanoparticles. Nano Lett. 3, 1289–1291 (2003).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2018YFA0209402 (D.Z.)), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (22088101 (D.Z.), 21875043 (X.L.), 22075049 (X.L.), 21733003 (D.Z.), 51961145403 (D.Z.), 21833008 (Z.L.)), the Key Basic Research Program of Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (22JC1410200 (D.Z.)), the Shanghai Rising-Star Program (20QA1401200 (X.L.)), the Shanghai Pilot Program for Basic Research-Fudan University (22TQ004 (X.L.)) and the Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai (22ZR1404600, 18ZR1404600, 20490710600 (X.L.)). This publication was made possible by NPRP grant number NPRP 12S-0309-190268 (X.L.) from the Qatar National Research Fund (a member of the Qatar Foundation), the ‘Junma’ Program of Inner Mongolia University (23600-5233709 (Y.M.)) and the Inner Mongolia Natural Science Foundation Youth Fund (2023QN02013 (Y.M.)). The statements made herein are solely the responsibility of the authors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
D.Z., X.L. and Y.M. contributed to the study conception and writing of the paper. Y.M. performed all material syntheses, characterizations, data collection and analysis. Y.A., B.M., K.L., C.W., W.Z., J.J. and J.Z. assisted Y.M. with the synthesis of materials and the data collection and analysis. Z.L, Y.-L.Z. and R.L. performed the simulation of the fusion process and distribution of products, and A.D. and L.D. were involved in partial analysis of the fusion mechanism. All authors read and commented on the paper.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Synthesis thanks Hongyu Chen and Ming-Yong Han for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editor: Alexandra Groves, in collaboration with the Nature Synthesis team.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Table of contents, Supplementary methods, Figs. 1–34, Table 1 and refs.1–9.
Supplementary Video 1
Movie 1 Dynamic fusion angle.
Supplementary Video 2
Movie 2 Dynamic fusion process.
Supplementary Video 3
Movie 3 Pairwise fusion.
Supplementary Data Fig. 2a
Droplet size distribution at different times.
Supplementary Data Figure 5d
Variation of estimated exposed surface areas at different times.
Supplementary Data Figure 9
SAXS pattern, N2 sorption isotherms, pore-size distribution, and (d) X-ray diffraction pattern of the samples.
Supplementary Data Figure 11a, b
Fourier-transform infrared spectra of palladium nanocrystals and zeta potential changes of CTAB solution at different times.
Supplementary Data Figure 13e-g
Variation of product yield with different palladium concentrations.
Supplementary Data Figure 23c
Calculated main products at each level.
Supplementary Data Figure 33
Curvature hot spot distribution at different times.
Source data
Source Data Fig. 1
Statistical source data Fig. 1e.
Source Data Fig. 2
Statistical source data Fig. 2b,d,f,h,j.
Source Data Fig. 4
Statistical source data Fig. 4c.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Ma, Y., Zhu, YL., Lin, R. et al. Synthesis of branched silica nanotrees using a nanodroplet sequential fusion strategy. Nat. Synth 3, 236–244 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44160-023-00434-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44160-023-00434-z
This article is cited by
-
Intricate inorganic nanotrees
Nature Synthesis (2023)