Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review article
  • Published:

Current theories of prospective memory and new directions for theory development

Nature Reviews Psychology volume 2, pages 40–54 (2023)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Planning ahead has become an essential part of individuals’ work and private lives, and might involve scheduling business meetings, making appointments with a dentist or arranging to pick up a child from school after work. These mundane activities have one thing in common. They involve future plans that cannot be fulfilled at the time they are formed but only several minutes, hours, days or weeks later. Remembering to execute intended actions at the appropriate moment in the future is an important cognitive ability that has been studied under the terms of ‘memory for intentions’ or ‘prospective memory’. Several theories have been proposed that define which cognitive processes are recruited for remembering future intentions. In this Review, we discuss the extent to which major theories of prospective memory make distinguishable assumptions about underlying mechanisms of prospective memory and whether these theories are able to explain important empirical findings. We conclude that, overall, all current theories perform quite well in this regard, but they all seem to be tailored to a specific laboratory paradigm. Therefore, further formalization of theories, a broader coverage of real-life prospective memory and a better integration of other future-oriented cognitive phenomena will be important avenues for future theorizing.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Typical prospective memory laboratory paradigm.
Fig. 2: Prospective memory retrieval processes postulated by different prospective memory theories.
Fig. 3: Typical real-life prospective memory tasks.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kvavilashvili, L. & Rummel, J. On the nature of everyday prospection: a review and theoretical integration of research on mind-wandering, future thinking, and prospective memory. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 24, 210–237 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Szpunar, K. K., Spreng, R. N. & Schacter, D. L. A taxonomy of prospection: introducing an organizational framework for future-oriented cognition. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 18414–18421 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Schacter, D. L. Adaptive constructive processes and the future of memory. Am. Psychol. 67, 603–613 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Baumeister, R. F., Maranges, H. M. & Sjåstad, H. Consciousness of the future as a matrix of maybe: pragmatic prospection and the simulation of alternative possibilities. Psychol. Conscious. Theory Res. Pract. 5, 223–238 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cohen, A. L. & Hicks, J. L. Prospective Memory: Remembering To Remember, Remembering To Forget Vol. 1 (Springer, 2017).

  6. Ellis, J. A. in Practical Aspects Of Memory: Current Research And Issues (eds Gruneberg, M. M., Morris, P. E. & Sykes, R. N.) 371–376 (Wiley, 1988).

  7. Einstein, G. O. & McDaniel, M. A. Normal aging and prospective memory. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 16, 717–726 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kvavilashvili, L. Remembering intention as a distinct form of memory. Br. J. Psychol. 78, 507–518 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Loftus, E. F. Memory for intentions: the effect of presence of a cue and interpolated activity. Psychon. Sci. 23, 315–316 (1971).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Meacham, J. A. & Leiman, B. in Memory Observed: Remembering In Natural Contexts (ed Neisser, U.) 327–336 (Freeman, 1982).

  11. Meacham, J. A. & Singer, J. Incentive effects in prospective remembering. J. Psychol. 97, 191–197 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wilkins, A. J. & Baddeley, A. D. in Practical Aspects Of Memory (eds Gruneberg, M. M., Morris, P. E., & Sykes, R. N.) (Academic, 1978).

  13. Harris, J. E. in Everyday Memory, Actions And Absent-mindedness (eds Harris, J. E. & Morris,P. E.) 71–92 (Academic Press, 1984).

  14. Loft, S., Dismukes, K. & Grundgeiger, T. in Current Issues In Memory: Prospective Memory (eds Rummel, J. & McDaniel, M. A.) 170–185 (Taylor & Francis, 2019).

  15. Loft, S., Smith, R. E. & Remington, R. W. Minimizing the disruptive effects of prospective memory in simulated air traffic control. J. Exp. Psychol. Appl. 19, 254–265 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Loft, S. Applying psychological science to examine prospective memory in simulated air traffic control. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 23, 326–331 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Grundgeiger, T., Sanderson, P. M. & Dismukes, R. K. Prospective memory in complex sociotechnical systems. J. Psychol. 222, 100–109 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ellis, J. A. in Prospective Memory: Theory And Applications (eds Brandimonte, M., Einstein, G. O. & McDaniel, M. A.) (Lawrence Erlbaum, 1996).

  19. Kliegel, M., Altgassen, M., Hering, A. & Rose, N. S. A process-model based approach to prospective memory impairment in Parkinson’s disease. Neuropsychologia 49, 2166–2177 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. McBride, D. M. & Workman, R. A. Is prospective memory unique? A comparison of prospective and retrospective memory. Psychol. Learn. Motiv. Adv. Res. Theory 67, 213–238 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Smith, R. E. & Bayen, U. J. A multinomial model of event-based prospective memory. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 30, 756–777 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Meier, B., Zimmermann, T. D. & Perrig, W. J. Retrieval experience in prospective memory: strategic monitoring and spontaneous retrieval. Memory 14, 872–889 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Brandimonte, M. A. & Passolunghi, M. C. The effect of cue-familiarity, cue-distinctiveness, and retention interval on prospective remembering. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Exp. Psychol. 47, 565–587 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Cook, G. I., Marsh, R. L. & Hicks, J. L. Associating a time-based prospective memory task with an expected context can improve or impair intention completion. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 19, 345–360 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Graf, P. & Uttl, B. Prospective memory: a new focus for research. Conscious. Cogn. 10, 437–450 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Marsh, R. L., Hicks, J. L., Cook, G. I., Hansen, J. S. & Pallos, A. L. Interference to ongoing activities covaries with the characteristics of an event-based intention. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 29, 861–870 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Smith, R. E. The cost of remembering to remember in event-based prospective memory: investigating the capacity demands of delayed intention performance. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 29, 347–361 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Heathcote, A., Loft, S. & Remington, R. W. Slow down and remember to remember! A delay theory of prospective memory costs. Psychol. Rev. 122, 376–410 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Scullin, M. K., Bugg, J. M., McDaniel, M. A. & Einstein, G. O. Prospective memory and aging: preserved spontaneous retrieval, but impaired deactivation, in older adults. Mem. Cogn. 39, 1232–1240 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Rummel, J., Wesslein, A. K. & Meiser, T. The role of action coordination for prospective memory: task-interruption demands affect intention realization. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 43, 717–735 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Einstein, G. O., McDaniel, M. A., Richardson, S. L., Guynn, M. J. & Cunfer, A. R. Aging and prospective memory: examining the influences of self-initiated retrieval processes. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 21, 996–1007 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kvavilashvili, L., Kornbrot, D. E., Mash, V., Cockburn, J. & Milne, A. Differential effects of age on prospective and retrospective memory tasks in young, young–old, and old–old adults. Memory 17, 180–196 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Ballhausen, N., Schnitzspahn, K. M., Horn, S. S. & Kliegel, M. The interplay of intention maintenance and cue monitoring in younger and older adults’ prospective memory. Mem. Cogn. 45, 1113–1125 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Maylor, E. A. Age-related impairment in an event-based prospective-memory task. Psychol. Aging 11, 74–78 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Marsh, R. L., Hancock, T. W. & Hicks, J. L. The demands of an ongoing activity influence the success of event-based prospective memory. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 9, 604–610 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Marsh, R. L. & Hicks, J. L. Event-based prospective memory and executive control of working memory. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 24, 336–349 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Matos, P., Pereira, D. R., Albuquerque, P. B. & Santos, F. H. How does performing demanding activities influence prospective memory? A systematic review. Adv. Cogn. Psychol. 16, 268–290 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. McBride, D. M., Beckner, J. K. & Abney, D. H. Effects of delay of prospective memory cues in an ongoing task on prospective memory task performance. Mem. Cogn. 39, 1222–1231 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Martin, B. A., Brown, N. L. & Hicks, J. L. Ongoing task delays affect prospective memory more powerfully than filler task delays. Can. J. Exp. Psychol. 65, 48–56 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Conte, A. M. & McBride, D. M. Comparing time-based and event-based prospective memory over short delays. Memory 26, 936–945 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Smith, R. E., Hunt, R. R., McVay, J. C. & McConnell, M. D. The cost of event-based prospective memory: salient target events. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 33, 734–746 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Strickland, L., Heathcote, A., Remington, R. W. & Loft, S. Accumulating evidence about what prospective memory costs actually reveal. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 43, 1616–1629 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Smith, R. E. What costs do reveal and moving beyond the cost debate: reply to Einstein and McDaniel (2010). J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 36, 1089–1095 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Kliegel, M., Martin, M., McDaniel, M. A. & Einstein, G. O. Importance effects on performance in event-based prospective memory tasks. Memory 12, 553–561 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Walter, S. & Meier, B. The impact of absolute importance and processing overlaps on prospective memory performance. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 30, 170–177 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Cook, G. I., Rummel, J. & Dummel, S. Toward an understanding of motivational influences on prospective memory using value-added intentions. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 9, 278 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Walter, S. & Meier, B. Social importance enhances prospective memory: evidence from an event-based task. Memory 25, 777–783 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Brandimonte, M. A., Ferrante, D., Bianco, C. & Villani, M. G. Memory for pro-social intentions: when competing motives collide. Cognition 114, 436–441 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. D’Angelo, G., Bosco, A., Bianco, C. & Brandimonte, M. A. The effects of collaboration and competition on pro-social prospective memory. Psychol. Belg. 52, 205–228 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Cohen, A.-L., Jaudas, A. & Gollwitzer, P. M. Number of cues influences the cost of remembering to remember. Mem. Cogn. 36, 149–156 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Cohen, A.-L. Attentional decoupling while pursuing intentions: a form of mind wandering? Front. Psychol. 4, 693 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Brewer, G. A., Knight, J., Meeks, J. T. & Marsh, R. L. On the role of imagery in event-based prospective memory. Conscious. Cogn. 20, 901–907 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. McCrea, S. M., Penningroth, S. L. & Radakovich, M. P. Implementation intentions forge a strong cue-response link and boost prospective memory performance. J. Cogn. Psychol. 27, 12–26 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. McDaniel, M. A., Howard, D. C. & Butler, K. M. Implementation intentions facilitate prospective memory under high attention demands. Mem. Cogn. 36, 716–724 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. McDaniel, M. A. & Scullin, M. K. Implementation intention encoding does not automatize prospective memory responding. Mem. Cogn. 38, 221–232 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Rummel, J., Einstein, G. O. & Rampey, H. Implementation intention encoding in a prospective memory task enhances spontaneous retrieval of intentions. Memory 20, 803–817 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. McFarland, C. P. & Glisky, E. L. Implementation intentions and imagery: individual and combined effects on prospective memory among younger adults. Mem. Cogn. 40, 62–69 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Smith, R. E., Rogers, M. D. M., McVay, J. C., Lopez, J. A. & Loft, S. Investigating how implementation intentions improve non-focal prospective memory tasks. Conscious. Cogn. 27, 213–230 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Scullin, M. K., McDaniel, M. A., Shelton, J. T. & Lee, J. H. Focal/nonfocal cue effects in prospective memory: monitoring difficulty or different retrieval processes? J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 36, 736–749 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Einstein, G. O. & McDaniel, M. A. Prospective memory: multiple retrieval processes. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 14, 286–290 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Zuber, S., Kliegel, M. & Ihle, A. An individual difference perspective on focal versus nonfocal prospective memory. Mem. Cogn. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-016-0628-5 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. McBride, D. M. & Abney, D. H. A comparison of transfer-appropriate processing and multi-process frameworks for prospective memory performance. Exp. Psychol. 59, 190–198 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Einstein, G. O., McDaniel, M. A., Manzi, M., Cochran, B. & Baker, M. Prospective memory and aging: forgetting intentions over short delays. Psychol. Aging 15, 671–683 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Hefer, C., Cohen, A. L., Jaudas, A. & Dreisbach, G. The flexible engagement of monitoring processes in non-focal and focal prospective memory tasks with salient cues. Acta Psychol. 179, 42–53 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Marsh, R. L., Hicks, J. L. & Cook, G. I. Task interference from prospective memories covaries with contextual associations of fulfilling them. Mem. Cogn. 34, 1037–1045 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Lourenco, J. S., White, K. & Maylor, E. A. Target context specification can reduce costs in nonfocal prospective memory. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 39, 1757–1764 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Smith, R. E. & Loft, S. Investigating the cost to ongoing tasks not associated with prospective memory task requirements. Conscious. Cogn. 27, 1–13 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Bugg, J. M. & Ball, B. H. The strategic control of prospective memory monitoring in response to complex and probabilistic contextual cues. Mem. Cogn. 45, 755–775 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Ball, B. H., Brewer, G. A., Loft, S. & Bowden, V. Uncovering continuous and transient monitoring profiles in event-based prospective memory. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 22, 492–499 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Ball, B. H., Li, Y. P. & Bugg, J. M. Aging and strategic prospective memory monitoring. Mem. Cogn. 48, 370–389 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Bowden, V. K., Smith, R. E. & Loft, S. Eye movements provide insights into the conscious use of context in prospective memory. Conscious. Cogn. 52, 68–74 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Lourenco, J. S. & Maylor, E. A. Is it relevant? Influence of trial manipulations of prospective memory context on task interference. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 67, 687–702 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Kuhlmann, B. G. & Rummel, J. Context-specific prospective-memory processing: evidence for flexible attention allocation adjustments after intention encoding. Mem. Cogn. 42, 943–949 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Smith, R. E., Hunt, R. R. & Murray, A. E. Prospective memory in context: moving through a familiar space. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 43, 189–204 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Bowden, V. K., Smith, R. E. & Loft, S. Improving prospective memory with contextual cueing. Mem. Cogn. 49, 692–711 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Meier, B. & Zimmermann, T. D. Loads and loads and loads: the influence of prospective load, retrospective load, and ongoing task load in prospective memory. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 9, 322 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Horn, S. S., Bayen, U. J., Smith, R. E. & Boywitt, C. D. The multinomial model of prospective memory: validity of ongoing-task parameters. Exp. Psychol. 58, 247–255 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Harrison, T. L., Mullet, H. G., Whiffen, K. N., Ousterhout, H. & Einstein, G. O. Prospective memory: effects of divided attention on spontaneous retrieval. Mem. Cogn. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-013-0357-y (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Bugg, J. M. & Scullin, M. K. Controlling intentions: the surprising ease of stopping after going relative to stopping after never having gone. Psychol. Sci. 24, 2463–2471 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Scullin, M. K., Bugg, J. M. & McDaniel, M. A. Whoops, I did it again: commission errors in prospective memory. Psychol. Aging 27, 46–53 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Scullin, M. K., Einstein, G. O. & McDaniel, M. A. Evidence for spontaneous retrieval of suspended but not finished prospective memories. Mem. Cogn. 37, 425–433 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Mullet, H. G. et al. Prospective memory and aging: evidence for preserved spontaneous retrieval with exact but not related cues. Psychol. Aging 28, 910–922 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Knight, J. B. et al. An observation on the spontaneous noticing of prospective memory event-based cues. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 37, 298–307 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Walser, M., Fischer, R. & Goschke, T. The failure of deactivating intentions: aftereffects of completed intentions in the repeated prospective memory cue paradigm. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 38, 1030–1044 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Walser, M., Goschke, T., Möschl, M. & Fischer, R. Intention deactivation: effects of prospective memory task similarity on aftereffects of completed intentions. Psychol. Res. 81, 961–981 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Bugg, J. M., Scullin, M. K. & McDaniel, M. A. Strengthening encoding via implementation intention formation increases prospective memory commission errors. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 20, 522–527 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Matos, P., Santos, F. H. & Albuquerque, P. B. When we must forget: the effect of cognitive load on prospective memory commission errors. Memory 28, 374–385 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. McDaniel, M. A. & Einstein, G. O. Strategic and automatic processes in prospective memory retrieval: a multiprocess framework. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 14, 127–144 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Guynn, M. J. A two-process model of strategic monitoring in event-based prospective momory: activation/retrieval mode and checking. Int. J. Psychol. 38, 245–256 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Guynn, M. J. Task interference in prospective memory: adopting a retrieval mode and checking for targets. Adv. Cogn. Psychol. 17, 203–211 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. McDaniel, M. A., Umanath, S., Einstein, G. O. & Waldum, E. R. Dual pathways to prospective remembering. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 9, 392 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. McDaniel, M. A., Lamontagne, P., Beck, S. M., Scullin, M. K. & Braver, T. S. Dissociable neural routes to successful prospective memory. Psychol. Sci. 24, 1791–1800 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Cona, G., Bisiacchi, P. S., Sartori, G. & Scarpazza, C. Effects of cue focality on the neural mechanisms of prospective memory: a meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies. Sci. Rep. 6, 25983 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. McDaniel, M. A., Guynn, M. J., Einstein, G. O. & Breneiser, J. Cue-focused and reflexive-associative processes in prospective memory retrieval. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 30, 605–614 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Breneiser, J. E. & McDaniel, M. A. Discrepancy processes in prospective memory retrieval. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 13, 837–841 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Guynn, M. J. & McDaniel, M. A. Target preexposure eliminates the effect of distraction on event-based prospective memory. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 14, 484–488 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Lee, J. H. & McDaniel, M. A. Discrepancy-plus-search processes in prospective memory retrieval. Mem. Cogn. 41, 443–451 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Rummel, J. & Meiser, T. Spontaneous prospective-memory processing: unexpected fluency experiences trigger erroneous intention executions. Mem. Cogn. 44, 89–103 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Einstein, G. O. et al. Multiple processes in prospective memory retrieval: factors determining monitoring versus spontaneous retrieval. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 134, 327–342 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  100. Scullin, M. K., McDaniel, M. A. & Shelton, J. T. The dynamic multiprocess framework: evidence from prospective memory with contextual variability. Cogn. Psychol. 67, 55–71 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. Shelton, J. T. & Scullin, M. K. The dynamic interplay between bottom-up and top-down processes supporting prospective remembering. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 26, 352–358 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Cowan, N. et al. On the capacity of attention: its estimation and its role in working memory and cognitive aptitudes. Cogn. Psychol. 51, 42–100 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. Arnold, N. R., Bayen, U. J. & Smith, R. E. Hierarchical multinomial modeling approaches: an application to prospective memory and working memory. Exp. Psychol. 62, 143–152 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  104. Smith, R. E., Persyn, D. & Butler, P. Prospective memory, personality, and working memory: a formal modeling approach. J. Psychol. 219, 108–116 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  105. Rummel, J. & Meiser, T. The role of metacognition in prospective memory: anticipated task demands influence attention allocation strategies. Conscious. Cogn. 22, 931–943 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  106. Harrison, T. L. & Einstein, G. O. Prospective memory: are preparatory attentional processes necessary for a single focal cue? Mem. Cogn. 38, 860–867 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  107. Beck, S. M., Ruge, H., Walser, M. & Goschke, T. The functional neuroanatomy of spontaneous retrieval and strategic monitoring of delayed intentions. Neuropsychologia 52, 37–50 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  108. Smith, R. E. Prospective memory in context. Psychol. Learn. Motiv. 66, 211–249 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  109. Marsh, R. L., Cook, G. I. & Hicks, J. L. Task interference from event-based intentions can be material specific. Mem. Cogn. 34, 1636–1643 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  110. Loft, S. & Remington, R. W. Wait a second: brief delays in responding reduce focality effects in event-based prospective memory. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 66, 1432–1447 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  111. Logan, G. D. & Cowan, W. B. On the ability to inhibit thought and action: a theory of an act of control. Psychol. Rev. 91, 295–327 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  112. Strickland, L., Loft, S., Remington, R. W. & Heathcote, A. Racing to remember: a theory of decision control in event-based prospective memory. Psychol. Rev. 125, 851–887 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  113. Boag, R. J., Strickland, L., Loft, S. & Heathcote, A. Strategic attention and decision control support prospective memory in a complex dual-task environment. Cognition https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.05.011 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  114. Strickland, L. et al. Prospective memory in the red zone: cognitive control and capacity sharing in a complex, multi-stimulus task. J. Exp. Psychol. Appl. 25, 695–715 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  115. Braver, T. S. The variable nature of cognitive control: a dual mechanisms framework. Trends Cogn. Sci. 16, 106–113 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  116. Horn, S. S. & Bayen, U. J. Modeling criterion shifts and target checking in prospective memory monitoring. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 41, 95–117 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  117. Boywitt, C. D. & Rummel, J. A diffusion model analysis of task interference effects in prospective memory. Mem. Cogn. 40, 19–27 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  118. Ball, B. H. & Aschenbrenner, A. J. The importance of age-related differences in prospective memory: evidence from diffusion model analyses. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 25, 1114–1122 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  119. Strickland, L., Heathcote, A., Humphreys, M. S. & Loft, S. Target learning in event-based prospective memory. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000900 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  120. Ball, B. H., Vogel, A., Ellis, D. M. & Brewer, G. A. Wait a second… boundary conditions on delayed responding theories of prospective memory. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 47, 858–877 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  121. Smith, R. E. & Bayen, U. J. The effects of working memory resource availability on prospective memory: a formal modeling approach. Exp. Psychol. 52, 243–256 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  122. Rummel, J., Boywitt, C. D. & Meiser, T. Assessing the validity of multinomial models using extraneous variables: an application to prospective memory. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 64, 2194–2210 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  123. Ball, B. H. & Brewer, G. A. Proactive control processes in event-based prospective memory: evidence from intraindividual variability and ex-Gaussian analyses. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 44, 793–811 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  124. Loft, S., Bowden, V. K., Ball, B. H. & Brewer, G. A. Fitting an ex-Gaussian function to examine costs in event-based prospective memory: evidence for a continuous monitoring profile. Acta Psychol. 152, 177–182 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  125. Abney, D. H., McBride, D. M. & Petrella, S. N. Interactive effects in transfer-appropriate processing for event-based prospective memory: the roles of effort, ongoing task, and PM cue properties. Mem. Cogn. 41, 1032–1045 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  126. Matzke, D. & Wagenmakers, E. J. Psychological interpretation of the ex-Gaussian and shifted Wald parameters: a diffusion model analysis. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 16, 798–817 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  127. Gilbert, S. J., Hadjipavlou, N. & Raoelison, M. Automaticity and control in prospective memory: a computational model. PLoS One 8, e59852 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  128. Boag, R. J., Strickland, L., Heathcote, A., Neal, A. & Loft, S. Cognitive control and capacity for prospective memory in complex dynamic environments. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 148, 2181–2206 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  129. Grünbaum, T., Oren, F. & Kyllingsbæk, S. A new cognitive model of long-term memory for intentions. Cognition 215, 104817 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  130. Rummel, J. & Kvavilashvili, L. in Current Issues In Memory: Prospective Memory (eds Rummel, J. & McDaniel, M. A.) Ch. 10, 157–169 (Routledge, 2019).

  131. Dismukes, R. K. Prospective memory in workplace and everyday situations. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 21, 215–220 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  132. Dismukes, R. K. Remembrance of things future: prospective memory in laboratory, workplace, and everyday settings. Rev. Hum. Factors Ergon. 6, 79–122 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  133. Schnitzspahn, K. M., Kvavilashvili, L. & Altgassen, M. Redefining the pattern of age-prospective memory-paradox: new insights on age effects in lab-based, naturalistic, and self-assigned tasks. Psychol. Res. 84, 1370–1386 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  134. Holbrook, J. & Dismukes, K. Prospective memory in everyday tasks. Proc. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. Annu. Meet. 53, 590–594 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  135. Oksanen, K. M., Waldum, E. R., McDaniel, M. A. & Braver, T. S. Neural mechanisms of time-based prospective memory: evidence for transient monitoring. PLoS One 9, e92123 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  136. Okuda, J. et al. Differential involvement of regions of rostral prefrontal cortex (Brodmann area 10) in time- and event-based prospective memory. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 64, 233–246 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  137. Maylor, E. A. Age and prospective memory. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 42, 471–493 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  138. Waldum, E. R. & McDaniel, M. A. Why are you late? Investigating the role of time management in time-based prospective memory. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 145, https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000183 (2016).

  139. Waldum, E. R. & Sahakyan, L. A role for memory in prospective timing informs timing in prospective memory. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 142, 809–826 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  140. Haines, S. J. et al. Differences in time-based task characteristics help to explain the age-prospective memory paradox. Cognition 202, 104305 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  141. Nigro, G. & Cicogna, P. C. Does delay affect prospective memory performance? Eur. Psychol. 5, 228–233 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  142. McBride, D. M., Coane, J. H., Drwal, J. & LaRose, S. A. M. Differential effects of delay on time-based prospective memory in younger and older adults. Aging Neuropsychol. C 20, 700–721 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  143. Kvavilashvili, L. & Fisher, L. Is time-based prospective remembering mediated by self-initiated rehearsals? Role of incidental cues, ongoing activity, age, and motivation. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 136, 112–132 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  144. Rothen, N. & Meier, B. Psychophysiology of prospective memory. Memory 22, 867–880 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  145. Kelemen, W. L., Weinberg, W. B., Alford, H. S., Mulvey, E. K. & Kaeochinda, K. F. Improving the reliability of event-based laboratory tests of prospective memory. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 13, 1028–1032 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  146. Meier, B., Matter, S., Baumann, B., Walter, S. & Koenig, T. From episodic to habitual prospective memory: ERP-evidence for a linear transition. Front. Hum. Neurosci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00489 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  147. McDaniel, M. A., Bugg, J. M., Ramuschkat, G. M., Kliegel, M. & Einstein, G. O. Repetition errors in habitual prospective memory: elimination of age differences via complex actions or appropriate resource allocation. Neuropsychol. Dev. Cogn. B 16, 563–588 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  148. Unsworth, N., Brewer, G. A. & Spillers, G. J. Variation in cognitive failures: an individual differences investigation of everyday attention and memory failures. J. Mem. Lang. 67, 1–16 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  149. Rendell, P. G. & Thomson, D. M. The effect of ageing on remembering to remember: an investigation of simulated medication regimens. Aust. J. Ageing 12, 11–18 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  150. Rendell, P. G. & Thomson, D. M. Aging and prospective memory: differences between naturalistic and laboratory tasks. J. Gerontol. B 54, P256–P269 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  151. Aberle, I., Rendell, P. G., Rose, N. S., McDaniel, M. A. & Kliegel, M. The age prospective memory paradox: young adults may not give their best outside of the lab. Dev. Psychol. 46, 1444–1453 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  152. Bailey, P. E., Henry, J. D., Rendell, P. G., Phillips, L. H. & Kliegel, M. Dismantling the “age–prospective memory paradox”: the classic laboratory paradigm simulated in a naturalistic setting. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 63, 646–652 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  153. Schnitzspahn, K. M., Ihle, A., Henry, J. D., Rendell, P. G. & Kliegel, M. The age–prospective memory-paradox: an exploration of possible mechanisms. Int. Psychogeriatr. 23, 583–592 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  154. Niedźwieńska, A. & Barzykowski, K. The age prospective memory paradox within the same sample in time-based and event-based tasks. Aging Neuropsychol. Cogn. 19, 58–83 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  155. Azzopardi, B., Auffray, C. & Kermarrec, C. Paradoxical effect of aging on laboratory and naturalistic time-based prospective memory tasks. Role of executive functions. Can. J. Aging 36, 30–40 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  156. Lakatos, I. The Methodology Of Scientific Research Programmes: Philosophical Papers Vol. 1 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1978).

  157. McBride, D. M. & Flaherty, M. Comparing costs in time-based and event-based prospective memory. Memory 28, 918–925 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  158. Park, D. C., Hertzog, C., Kidder, D. P., Morrell, R. W. & Mayhorn, C. B. Effect of age on event-based and time-based prospective memory. Psychol. Aging 12, 314–327 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  159. Jäger, T. & Kliegel, M. Time-based and event-based prospective memory across adulthood: underlying mechanisms and differential costs on the ongoing task. J. Gen. Psychol. 135, 4–22 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  160. Mace, J. H. in Involuntary Memory (ed Mace, J. H.) 1–19 (Blackwell, 2007).

  161. Berntsen, D. Involuntary Autobiographical Memories. An Introduction To The Unbidden Past (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2009).

  162. Smallwood, J. Distinguishing how from why the mind wanders: a process-occurrence framework for self-generated mental activity. Psychol. Bull. 139, 519–535 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  163. Smallwood, J. & Schooler, J. W. The science of mind wandering: empirically navigating the stream of consciousness. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 66, 487–518 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  164. Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D. & Oettingen, G. Pragmatic prospection: how and why people think about the future. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 20, 3–16 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  165. Schacter, D. L., Addis, D. R. & Buckner, R. L. Episodic simulation of future events: concepts, data, and applications. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1124, 39–60 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  166. Mazzoni, G. Involuntary memories and involuntary future thinking differently tax cognitive resources. Psychol. Res. 83, 684–697 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  167. Vannucci, M., Pelagatti, C., Hanczakowski, M. & Chiorri, C. Visual attentional load affects the frequency of involuntary autobiographical memories and their level of meta-awareness. Mem. Cogn. 47, 117–129 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  168. Plimpton, B., Patel, P. & Kvavilashvili, L. Role of triggers and dysphoria in mind-wandering about past, present and future: a laboratory study. Conscious. Cogn. 33, 261–276 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  169. Warden, E. A., Plimpton, B. & Kvavilashvili, L. Absence of age effects on spontaneous past and future thinking in daily life. Psychol. Res. 83, 726–746 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  170. Seli, P., Risko, E. F. & Smilek, D. On the necessity of distinguishing between unintentional and intentional mind wandering. Psychol. Sci. 27, 685–691 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  171. Seli, P. et al. On the clock: evidence for the rapid and strategic modulation of mind wandering. Psychol. Sci. 29, 1247–1256 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  172. Cole, S. & Kvavilashvili, L. Spontaneous and deliberate future thinking: a dual process account. Psychol. Res. 85, 464–479 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

J.R. thanks the German Research Foundation (DFG) for the award of a Heisenberg Professorial Fellowship (grant number RU1996/2-1).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany

    Jan Rummel

  2. Division of Psychology, School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK

    Lia Kvavilashvili

Authors
  1. Jan Rummel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lia Kvavilashvili
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

The authors contributed equally to all aspects of the article.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jan Rummel or Lia Kvavilashvili.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Reviews Psychology thanks Shane Loft and the other, anonymous, reviewer for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rummel, J., Kvavilashvili, L. Current theories of prospective memory and new directions for theory development. Nat Rev Psychol 2, 40–54 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-022-00121-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-022-00121-4

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing