Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

Psychological models and their distractors

Nature Reviews Psychology volume 1, pages 127–128 (2022)Cite this article

Subjects

The lack of models in psychology hinders scientific progress. To start addressing this problem, we need a clear understanding of what models are and what they are not.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. van Rooij, I. & Baggio, G. Theory before the test: how to build high-verisimilitude explanatory theories in psychological science. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 16, 682–697 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Guest, O. & Martin, A. E. How computational modeling can force theory building in psychological science. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 16, 789–802 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Navarro, D. J. If mathematical psychology did not exist we might need to invent it: a comment on theory building in psychology. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 16, 707–716 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Muthukrishna, M. & Henrich, J. A problem in theory. Nat. Hum. Behav. 3, 221–229 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Smaldino, P. Better methods can’t make up for mediocre theory. Nature 575, 9–10 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. van Rooij, I. & Baggio, G. Theory development requires an epistemological sea change. Psychol. Inq. 31, 321–325 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Smaldino, P. How to build a strong theoretical foundation. Psychol. Inq. 31, 297–301 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cummins, R. in Explanation and Cognition (eds Keil, F. C. & Wilson, R. A.) 117–144 (MIT Press, 2000).

  9. Cummins, R. Meaning and Mental Representation (MIT Press, 1989).

  10. Epstein, J. M. Why model? J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. 11, 12 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

    Iris van Rooij

  2. Department of Linguistics, Cognitive Science, and Semiotics & Interacting Minds Centre, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark

    Iris van Rooij

Authors
  1. Iris van Rooij
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Iris van Rooij.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

van Rooij, I. Psychological models and their distractors. Nat Rev Psychol 1, 127–128 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-022-00031-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-022-00031-5

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing