Abstract
Alkaline mafic magmas forming intra-plate oceanic islands are believed to be strongly enriched in CO2 due to low-degree partial melting of enriched mantle sources. However, until now, such CO2 enhancement has not been verified by measuring CO2 degassing during a subaerial eruption. Here, we provide evidence of highly CO2-rich gas emissions during the 86-day 2021 Tajogaite eruption of Cumbre Vieja volcano on La Palma Island, in the Canary archipelago. Our results reveal sustained high plume CO2/SO2 ratios, which, when combined with SO2 fluxes, melt inclusion volatile contents and magma production rates at explosive and effusive vents, imply a magmatic CO2 content of 4.5 ± 1.5 wt%. The amount of CO2 released during the 2021 eruptive activity was 28 ± 14 Mt CO2. Extrapolating to the volume of alkaline mafic magmas forming La Palma alone (estimated as 4000 km3 erupted over 11 Ma), we infer a maximum CO2 emission into the ocean and atmosphere of 1016 moles of CO2, equivalent to 20% of the eruptive CO2 emissions from a large igneous province eruption, suggesting that the formation of the Canary volcanic archipelago produced a CO2 emission of similar magnitude as a large igneous province.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Volatile exsolution and expansion during magma ascent are the primary drivers of volcanic eruptions1 and volcanic gas emissions have had a profound impact on volatile cycles2 and climate3 throughout Earth’s history. Quantifying the volatile content of magmas is therefore a key objective in volcanological research. Among the main volatile species carried by magmas (H2O, CO2, SO2, HCl, HF), CO2 is the least soluble and, therefore, the first to exsolve, even at pressures consistent with the mid- to lower crust. Volatile solubility behaviour is well-established for a wide range of magma compositions from experiments under various pressure and temperature conditions4; thermodynamics5 and microanalysis of dissolved volatiles in melt (glassy) droplets and fluid inclusions entrapped in crystals that form during magma storage and ascent6,7. The low solubility of CO2 drives exsolution prior to melt inclusion formation which, in addition to post-entrapment CO2-loss to bubbles and bubble decrepitation upon ascent8, means that inclusion-measured CO2 contents are lower limits for the initial CO2 content6. CO2-rich fluid inclusions trapped at high pressures9,10 show that a co-existing fluid phase may be present even at mantle depths if CO2 abundances are high enough11,12. In low viscosity magmatic systems CO2 bubbles are able to migrate separately or/and accumulate as foams at structural discontinuities13, thus degassing larger magma volumes than those eventually erupted. In our present study, we propose a limited impact from such differential CO2 degassing processes, as our measurements did not reveal large evolutions in CO2 compositions during the course of the eruption.
Trace element ratios such as CO2/Nb and CO2/Ba can provide an alternative approach to constrain the potential range of initial magmatic CO2 content14,15. Uncertainties arise, however, from the large variability in these ratios due to mantle heterogeneity and melt mixing16. Syn-eruptive measurements of CO2 emissions, while challenging to acquire, can provide robust information on pre-eruptive contents of CO2 and other volatiles, when combined with measurements of magma eruption rate, SO2 fluxes and the initial magma sulfur (S) content12,14,17. Eruptive gas compositions are measurable either remotely, using open-path Fourier Transform infra-red (OP-FTIR) spectroscopy with molten lava as the radiation source18,19, or in-situ, using Multi-GAS analysis of dilute gas plumes20; see Methods. Scaling the X/SO2 ratio, where X is the volatile of interest, to the SO2 flux measured from the ground and space21,22,23 provides the mass flux of CO2 and other components. Normalising these mass fluxes to the mass eruption rate (MER) of magma then allows initial volatile contents in the magma to be calculated24.
One of the most significant recent discoveries in volcanology is that magmatic CO2 contents may be much higher than initially thought25,26. This observation has important implications for the contribution of volcanism to the global geological CO2 budget27,28 and to global climate and mass-extinction events during large igneous province eruptions29. In particular, alkaline mafic magmas have been highlighted as a main source of CO2-rich volcanism30,31,32, with those erupted at intra-plate oceanic islands believed to be especially enriched in CO2 due to low-degree partial melting of enriched mantle sources12. In the Canary volcanic archipelago, eastern Atlantic ocean, a high CO2 content between 2.5 and 5 wt% was estimated in basanites from El Hierro volcano32. However, direct measurements of CO2 emissions during eruption of such magmas still remain sparse and were hitherto non-existent for the Canary volcanic archipelago.
The 2021 Tajogaite eruption of the Cumbre Vieja volcanic system, on La Palma island, provided a remarkable opportunity to quantify volatile emissions and magma volatile contents for alkaline mafic magmatism in this archipelago. The Canary Islands constitute the subaerial portions of a group of voluminous intraplate volcanoes that predominantly erupt alkaline magmas derived from a heterogeneous mantle source33. The Cumbre Vieja volcanic system is currently the most active in the archipelago; however, gas emissions from its last eruption in 1971 were not measured, so the 2021 eruption provided the first opportunity to assess gas geochemistry during a subaerial eruption in the Canary Islands.
The 85-day-long Tajogaite eruption began on 19th September 2021 along a NNW-ESE fracture system ~930 m above sea level, just above urbanised areas (Fig. 1). The eruption rapidly built up a main volcanic cone (Tajogaite) that hosted several linearly-aligned and closely-spaced vents34,35,36. Powerful lava fountaining and explosive activity were produced from central upper vents of the cone (referred to here as Fountaining Vent(s), FV), while spattering and lava flow effusion occurred at flank vents (hereafter referred to as Spattering Vent, SV, and Effusive Vent(s), EV; Fig. 1). Voluminous lava flows were erupted alongside sustained lava fountaining activity, producing dense lapilli and ash fallout, together forcing the evacuation of ~7000 people and caused extensive destruction until the end of the eruption on 13th December 202134. The initially erupted magma, an olivine-poor evolved basanite ascending from 10 to 16 km depth, was replaced by more primary, olivine-rich and highly oxidised basanite ascending from 27 to 31 km depth9,37,38. Continuous syn-eruptive seismicity clustering at ~10–16 km and ~22–27 km39, as well as the density distribution of CO2-rich fluid inclusions in olivines9,38, marked the respective storage depths of these two magmas.
The 2021 eruption site was relatively accessible, with established road/track infrastructure close to the vents. This enabled us to repeatedly (~daily) determine the chemical composition and mass flux of magmatic gases discharged from both explosive and effusive vents. Our measurements combined a suite of ground-based, aerial and orbital (satellite) instruments, locations are shown in Supplementary Fig. 1. Specifically, we quantified emitted gas compositions using Multi-GAS, deployed as ground-based (mobile and fixed stations) and drone-mounted systems, and OP-FTIR spectrometers (see Methods). We derived SO2 fluxes using data from the satellite-based TROPOMI sensor (see Methods). In this study, we quantify the magmatic CO2 flux produced during the 2021 Tajogaite eruption then combine with volcanological and petrological data to determine the CO2 content of the basanitic magma.
Results
A key observation from our field measurements is the sharp, systematic contrast in CO2/SO2 ratios measured in gas emissions from the explosive upper vents (FV) and the spattering/effusive (SV/EV) flank vents (Fig. 1). This pattern is well-illustrated by Multi-GAS data obtained between 27 September and 3 October 2021, with CO2/SO2 molar ratios varying from 52-25 (FV) to 3–13 (SV) and down to 0.3–0.04 (EV), as well as by OP-FTIR data collected from 3 October until the end of the eruption (Supplementary Table 1 and Fig. 1). Such a spectacular compositional contrast, at vents only 500 m apart, demonstrates a predominant outgassing of poorly-soluble CO2 through the central upper vents and, hence, its marked depletion in secondary degassing of the magma discharged effusively through the flank vents. A similar CO2-fractionation pattern was previously documented on Mt. Etna between eruptive18 and passive degassing40.
Our second key observation is that explosive gas emissions from the central upper vents (FV) displayed very high CO2/SO2 ratios during the whole eruption (Fig. 1). Our best OP-FTIR observations on December 2, 2021 (starred in Figs. 1 and 2) constrain the FV gas to contain 37 mol% H2O, 61 mol% CO2 and 1.7 mol% SO2, with a CO2/SO2 molar ratio of 36 (24 by mass) (Supplementary Table 1). A similarly high CO2/SO2 ratio persisted at the FV throughout the entire eruption (Fig. 1), with a mean value of 33 ± 9.7 (or 23 ± 6.7 by mass). This makes the syn-eruptive gas from Tajogaite explosive vents one of the most CO2-rich ever measured at an active volcano to date27,28,41. By contrast, the mean CO2/SO2 ratio at the lower flank vents exhibiting lava spattering (SV) was 7.3 ± 4.0 (or 5.0 ± 2.7 by mass) throughout the eruption.
To reconstruct the magma degassing path(s) (Fig. 2), we measured the dissolved H2O, CO2, and S contents of glassy basanitic melt inclusions entrapped in erupted olivine crystals. Details of volatile concentration measurement methods are shown below in “Methods” and in further detail in Supplementary Information. Dates and locations of sampling are shown in Supplementary Table 2 and dimensions of melt and fluid inclusions are in Supplementary Table 3. The sulphur content of these inclusions displays a narrow range, averaging 3290 ± 390 ppm (one standard deviation) and shows no systematic variation during the eruption (Supplementary Table 4 and Supplementary Figs. 2 and 3); it thus represents the initial sulphur abundance in the parental basanite. The same inclusions also contain 1.30–2.21 wt% H2O and 0.22–0.50 wt% CO2. According to experimental data for H2O and CO2 solubility in Canary basanites42, such concentrations correspond to melt inclusion entrapment pressures of ~290 to ~350 MPa, or ~10–12 km depth given the local crustal density structure39. This depth range fits with the near-Moho seismogenetic volume (at 10–16 km) active during the Cumbre Vieja eruption9,39, which we interpret as an intermediate magma ponding zone fed by the more deeply sourced (15–27 km) basanite9,38. The presence of pure CO2 fluid inclusions in olivine and other crystals within the erupted magma9,38 indicate that the mantle-derived basanite already co-existed with a CO2-rich gas phase prior to reaching this intermediate storage zone. It is thus very likely that the maximum dissolved CO2 content in melt inclusions (0.50 wt%) under-estimates the parental melt CO2. Using a C-H-O-S solubility model5, we, therefore, computed the evolving fluid composition (Fig. 2 and Supplementary Fig. 4) during decompression of magma containing initial CO2 contents of 0.5–5 wt%, in both closed- and open-system conditions, under temperature-redox conditions typical for La Palma basanites (see Methods; Supplementary Table 5).
Discussion
We interpret the gas composition data in the context of the distinct eruptive styles observed at the fountaining vents (FV) compared with spattering and effusive vents (SV and EV). In agreement with seismic evidence of rapid magma ascent from depth38, we consider that magma and exsolved gas ascended rapidly in near closed-system up to a shallow branch point where gas-melt decoupling began. Most exsolved gas continued ascending vertically to fuel explosive fragmentation at the FV, whilst most of the magma was erupted at the SV and EV; this is a typical dynamic in low-viscosity scoria cone-forming eruptions43. In this framework, the CO2-rich gas emitted at the FV exsolved and last equilibrated at relatively high pressure, while the CO2-poor, H2O- and SO2-richer gas emitted at the SV and EV derived primarily from low-pressure magma degassing of residual dissolved volatiles above the branch point.
Ultimately, the final gas compositions at FV, SV, and EV are controlled by the relative distributions of gas and magma between FV and EV/SV at the branch—which depends on geometry and fluid dynamics—and the dissolved concentration of SO2 and H2O remaining in the magma at the branch point. In Fig. 2, we assume that the branch point is at 10 MPa, ~400 m, and that all magma is erupted at the EV/SV (i.e. an end-member assumption).
Comparing our observations with modelled degassing trajectories in Fig. 2 shows that closed-system degassing with 0.5 wt% CO2 (run 4) cannot reproduce the CO2-rich FV compositions, confirming that maximum CO2 concentrations measured in melt inclusions (0.5 wt%) underestimate the initial CO2 abundance in the parental magma. FV compositions actually require closed-system degassing of a magma containing between 1 and 5 wt% initial CO2 (runs 1–3, and 5) with gas and melt remaining in equilibrium until the inferred branch point between FV and SV/EV (Supplementary Fig. 4). In contrast, EV (and many SV) gas compositions can only be reproduced by open-system degassing from 5 MPa to atmospheric pressure.
An important result of our modelling is that the relatively oxidised melt9,37 favours a high S solubility, such that 90–95% of the initial sulphur is still dissolved at the branch point between FV and SV/EV (Supplementary Fig. 4b). The rapid magma ascent may have also limited the extent of gas exsolution. This result provides a critical control on the gas compositions produced at FV and SV/EV: it implies that the SO2 flux produced at both FV and SV/EV was controlled largely by the mass eruption rate (MER) at each vent, whereas the CO2 flux was predominantly emitted through FV as demonstrated by the much higher CO2 content (CO2/SO2 ratio) of FV gas compared to SV/EV emissions. We highlight that the MER at the fountaining vents is critical to reproduce the high CO2/SO2 ratio in FV gas and, hence, to estimate the initial magma CO2 content, in combination with the total MER, the total SO2 flux and the initial S content. The calculations used to determine the initial CO2 concentrations are provided in Supplementary Table 6, and the mass-balance approach we used is described below.
We quantify the total SO2 flux using TROPOMI data collected from the Sentinel-5P satellite, analysed with a back-trajectory approach called PlumeTraj to determine the height, age and SO2 mass in each pixel23. Here we report the initial CO2 content for two cases: (1) focusing on a particular measurement day, 3rd October 2021, when simultaneous Multi-GAS, FTIR and TROPOMI measurements were made, and (2) considering the integrated emissions and MERs for the entire eruption.
On 3rd October, there was strong and sustained explosive activity at the summit vents during the day, accompanied by voluminous lava effusion from SV and EV. Our TROPOMI/PlumeTraj measurements (Fig. 3) indicate that the average SO2 flux was 860 ± 450 kg/s and the height of the eruption plume was 4500 ± 200 m, as confirmed by camera recording of the plume height from the Instituto Astrofísico de Canarias (IAC), 2365 m a.s.l. and 16.5 km north of the eruption44. The height of Tajogaite cone was measured as 1100 m35, so the net plume height was 3400 m. We quantify an explosive MER from this plume height of 22,600 ± 3300 kg/s using published scaling relationships45. This is greater than the 9000 kg/s attributed to the mass eruption rate generating the tephra and cone deposit44, with the difference arising from the mass of ash emitted into the atmosphere and transported more distally. Lava effusion rates were reported as 30 ± 15 m3/s on 3rd October46, yielding an effusive MER of 78,500 ± 40,000 kg/s using the measured lava density of 2618 ± 179 kg/s44.
The amount of sulphur released by unit mass of magma, ~3000 wt ppm, is given by the difference between the initial S content of 3290 ± 390 wt ppm measured in melt inclusions and the residual S content of the degassed glassy groundmass (440 wt ppm, which, corrected for the slight magma evolution during ascent, corresponds to 250 wt ppm whole rock). The key parameters described above (Supplementary Table 6) constrain much of the degassing system, but two key parameters remain to be defined: i) The quantity of SO2 which had exsolved at the pressure of the branch point between effusive and explosive conduits, and ii) the percentage of total exsolved gas which was transferred to the explosive vents. There was ~200 m height difference between the effusive vents and the fountaining vents, but these probably joined even deeper within the system at the branch point. Here we estimate a 400 m depth or ~10 MPa pressure. According to the S solubility vs. pressure relationship shown in Supplementary Fig. 4b, only 5–10% of the initial S was exsolved at 10 MPa. This is an upper limit since fast magma ascent may have kinetically hampered gas exsolution. The percentage of exsolved gas entering the FV conduit can be estimated from volcanological observations. Because lava spattering at the SV was moderately vigorous and thus involved partly degassed magma, our best estimate is 84 ± 5% of the exsolved gas ascending directly to the FV and 16% carried to the SV and EV.
With 7.5% S exsolved at the branch point and 84% of exsolved gas entering the FV, we calculate that an initial CO2 content of 4.4 ± 1.3 wt% is required to explain the CO2/SO2 mass ratio of 23 observed on 3rd October (see Fig. 4 and Supplementary Table 6). This produces an overall CO2/SO2 mass ratio for gas emissions from the effusive eruption of 1.7, which agrees with that measured in the mixed effusion/spattering gases (Fig. 1). The calculated SO2 flux produced in this approach of 600 ± 300 kg/s matches the SO2 flux of 860 ± 400 kg/s measured with TROPOMI (Fig. 3). We can do the same calculation using the time-averaged effusion and cone/tephra MERs, respectively assessed as 63,000 kg/s and 10,000 kg/s44, and we estimate a similar magnitude MER for the total airborne ash emissions, producing 20,000 kg/s for the total explosive MER. The time-averaged SO2 flux constrained by the TROPOMI-PlumeTraj data for the whole eruption is 500 ± 200 kg/s. With the same assumptions as above, we calculate an initial CO2 content of 4.6 wt% and find excellent agreement between the calculated and observed average SO2 flux. Overall, our mass balance approach leads to an initial magma CO2 content ranging from 4.1 wt% to 5.9 wt% for a pre-exsolved SO2 fraction of 5–10% and 80–95% exsolved gas entering the FV conduit. Our best estimate is 4.5 wt% (Fig. 4).
An initial CO2 content of 4.5 wt% in the 2021 Tajogaite basanite matches the upper values of parental CO2 content estimated for basanite erupted in 2011–2012 at nearby El Hierro island (2.5–4.2wt%), based on dissolved/exsolved volatiles in melt inclusions and trace element ratios32,47. A high CO2 content in La Palma basanite is consistent with a low degree of partial melting of a mantle source metasomatized by recycled components, as also proposed for El Hierro magmas32,33,47. For an initial magma CO2 content of 4.5 wt% we infer a daily average emission rate of 0.33 ± 0.16 Mt d−1 of CO2 and an overall CO2 emission of 28 ± 14 Mt during the 2021 Tajogaite eruption of Cumbre Vieja. This represents a large CO2 emission compared to previously reported eruptive emissions at other volcanoes27,28,48.
At the intermediate magma storage zone of ~10–15 km depth (ca. 275–410 MPa), where most of the syn-eruptive seismicity was occurring39, CO2 solubility in La Palma basanitic melts is predicted by solubility models42 to be only 0.25 to 0.6 wt%. Therefore, an important implication of our results is that about 4.0 wt% of CO2 was already exsolved at these seismogenic depths, in agreement with observations of dense CO2-rich fluid inclusions9,38. Under these conditions at least 1 wt% of H2O may have coexisted with CO2 in the exsolved fluid phase42. Thus, the basanitic magma stored at depths <27 km likely coexisted with an abundant exsolved fluid phase, which not only enhanced the explosivity of the eruption but could also increase the magma compressibility, buffering volumetric changes during depressurisation as the magma was erupted49. We cannot exclude the possibility that pre-eruptive segregation and accumulation of this CO2-rich gas phase in a reservoir could have contributed to the eruptive gas emissions, thereby producing higher CO2 contents in ascending magmas than that of the original stored magma. However, the preservation of high CO2/SO2 ratios in FV gas during the eruption suggests that there was not a strong differentiation of CO2 within the feeding magma reservoir, and that therefore our quantification of magmatic CO2 contents reflects that of the magma reservoir.
Conclusions
The volatile-rich nature of the 2021 Cumbre Vieja magma, particularly with respect to CO2, highlights that large-magnitude volatile emissions can be produced by intraplate alkaline ocean volcanism from mantle sources previously enriched in recycled oceanic crust. This observation suggests that throughout Earth’s history, the formation of ocean islands may have made a significant contribution to the geological carbon cycle. During the initial submarine formation of La Palma, there would have been substantial emission of volatiles into the ocean, followed by subaerial discharge once the island breached the surface. La Palma has a maximum height of 6423 m from ocean floor to summit and is, therefore, one of the tallest volcanic edifices on the planet. Its total submarine volume is estimated to be 3300 km3 from topographic surveys50,51. Its subaerial part is 1.7 Ma old and has a volume of 600 km3 52,53,54, composed of a combination of gabbro, basanite and phonolite. Assuming for simplicity that basanite is the average composition of the entire edifice and initially contained 4.5 wt% CO2, we estimate a discharge of 68,000 Mt CO2 (1.6 × 1015 moles) of CO2 during La Palma’s subaerial growth (Supplementary Table 7). If the submarine growth of La Palma volcanic island occurred at the same eruption rate as during its subaerial history, we then estimate a total build-up age of ~11 Ma and a total CO2 production of ~480,000 Mt (1.1 × 1016 moles). This crude calculation likely provides an underestimate as it does not take into account the CO2 contribution from intrusive magma emplacement into the crust. Such an amount of CO2 is equivalent to ca. 20% of the estimated CO2 release from a typical large igneous province29, many of which are implicated in periods of major environmental and climatic change in Earth’s history. Considering that La Palma is amongst the smaller of the eight main islands composing the Canary archipelago, we suggest that the integrated CO2 emissions associated with the construction of the entire archipelago may approach that of an LIP.
Methods
Volcanic gas composition
We measured plume gas composition during the Cumbre Vieja eruption using two independent and complementary techniques: in-situ plume measurements using aerial and ground-based Multi-GAS to characterise plume composition during the initial phase of the eruption (27 September to 4 October 2021) and remote sensing Fourier Transform Infra-red (FTIR) spectroscopy observations on 3 October to 2 December 2021 (Fig. 1). All gas composition results are listed in Supplementary Table 1.
Multi-GAS
The multi-component gas analyser system (Multi-GAS) technique was used to measure concentrations of CO2, SO2, H2S ± H2 (and P, T, RH) in the emitted gases The Multi-GAS was operated as (a) a ground-based mobile instrument, (b) a ground-based fixed station, and (c) an aerial instrument, mounted onboard a DJI Matrice M210 quad-rotor Unoccupied Aerial System (UAS) platform (Supplementary Table 1). For all instruments, air is sampled through a 1 µm particle filter exposed to ambient air, at a pump rate of 1.0 L min−1, and sensor data are logged at 1 Hz. SO2 and H2S electrochemical sensors (T3ST/F and T3H, both City Technology) were calibrated for 0–200 and 0–200 ppmv, respectively, with an accuracy of ±2% and a resolution of 0.1 ppmv. A non-dispersive infra-red (NDIR) spectrometer—either a Microsensorik Smartgas Modul Premium2 (aerial Multi-GAS; 0–5000 ppm range) or a Edinburgh Gascard ND (ground-based Multi-GAS; 0–10,000 ppm range)—were calibrated for CO2 with an accuracy of ±2% and a resolution of 1 ppmv. Units are shielded from radio frequency interference using a foil bag. Pressure (±1 hPa), temperature (±0.5 ˚C) and relative humidity (0–100%; ±3%) were also measured at 1 Hz using either a Bluedot BME280 sensor exposed to ambient air (aerial Multi-GAS) or Galltec sensor connected in series with the other sensors within the unit (ground-based).
UAS flights were undertaken in accordance with EU operating procedures, with airspace permission. Take-off locations were from two sites along Carretera San Nicolas, A (28.621302, −17.873859) and B (28.620874, −17.871741), each located ~900 m north of the summit vents (Supplementary Fig. 4). Flights involved between 30 and 1000 m of vertical ascent, depending on the target vent emissions, and were between 10 and 20 min in duration—although typically only a fraction of that time was spent in the dense region of the gas plume.
We measured passive gas emissions during a pause in the eruption on 27 September 2021 from a position hovering several metres above the northern rim of the cone (labelled PV in Fig. 1b). The pause lasted several hours before the main upper vent reactivated with vigorous fountaining and ash emission (Fig. 1c), ~30 min after our sampling flight. The reactivation was preceded by the emission of a white steam-rich plume from the lower, spattering vent.
The gas plume from the main upper vents producing strong lava fountaining (labelled FV in Fig. 1) grounded towards the northwest of the cone on 30 September 2021. We measured the gas composition at a distance of ~900 m from the vent using a ground-based Multi-GAS operating in portable mode, by walking traverses through the plume. Subsequently, the unit was installed as a fixed, ground-based station and this remained in place until 2 October 2021 when the site became at risk from lava flows. The station was programmed to acquire data for 30 min every hour. The fixed station was exposed periodically to grounding plumes from both the upper, lava fountaining vents (FV) and lower, spattering vent (labelled SV in Fig. 1) and these two distinct emission sources produced resolvable CO2/SO2 ratios in the time series gas data. The gas emissions from the spattering vent (SV) were measured again on 3 October 2021 much closer to source using an aerial Multi-GAS unit on-board the UAS.
An effusive vent opened at the base of the northern flank of the cone overnight between 30 September and 1 October 2021 (labelled EV in Fig. 1f), producing a lava flow and a strong gas plume. We measured the gas composition from the effusive vent during a UAS flight on 1 October, a few tens of metres downwind from the vent and at around 30 m elevation above ground level. Subsequently, a second effusive vent opened at slightly higher elevation on the northern flank on 4 October 2021 and was again sampled using the UAS-mounted aerial Multi-GAS on the same day.
Multi-GAS instruments were calibrated with standard reference gases at University of Palermo, Italy, prior to and following the field campaign, but required no instrumental drift corrections. All sensor data are logged locally to a micro-SD card and, for the aerial Multi-GAS, also telemetered directly to the ground station (using a RFD 868x Modem by RFDesign), where it can be viewed in real-time. The angle of the transmission antenna on the landing leg of the UAS required outwards orientation to minimise interference with the landing sensors located beneath the main body of the UAS. H2O concentrations were calculated from records of temperature and relative humidity, using the ambient pressure at the measurement altitude, according to the Arden Buck equations relating the pressure of vapour saturation to temperature for moist air. We post-processed gas concentration time series using Ratiocalc software55 and R. H2S concentrations were corrected for the 13% cross-sensitivity of the sensor to SO2 (determined during calibration with standard reference gases).
OP-FTIR
Two identical MIDAC OP-FTIR spectrometers with Stirling-cycle cooled MCT detectors were used to measure infra-red absorption spectra of magmatic gas, sourced from the NERC Field Spectroscopy Facility (https://fsf.nerc.ac.uk/) and INGV Etna Observatory. We measured the compositions of magmatic gas produced by the eruptive vents and lava flows. The OP-FTIR is a very powerful and flexible instrument, and when performing absorption measurements can work wherever there is cooler magmatic gas observed in front of a warmer radiation source. We used it in both passive and solar absorption modes56. Passive measurements were conducted using incandescent ash eruption, lava fountaining and lava flow sources18,19,57,58,59. Passive measurements provide constraints on H2O, CO2, SO2 and HCl. FTIR spectra were analysed by fitting spectra created with the Reference Forward Model (https://eodg.atm.ox.ac.uk/RFM/) and HITRAN 2008 database60. The fit windows were 2080–2150 cm−1 for CO, CO2 and H2O, 2450–2550 cm−1 for SO2 and 2690-2830 for HCl.
FTIR observations were taken in various eruptive vents and activity styles from October 3 to December 4 (Supplementary Table 1). As an illustration, we detail our measurements on October 3, when we operated simultaneously two OP-FTIR spectrometers; a first one measured degassing from the main lava spattering flank vent (SV), from a distance of 0.7 km in the Tacande Village area, while the other was targeting the ash-rich eruptive column from summit vents (FV) from a distance of 3 km (Supplementary Fig. 1). Eruptive activity at the latter vents gradually increased in intensity as the measurements progressed, and we observed a mixed gas emission, partly arising from the SV and partly from the FV. Gas emissions from the SV clearly reflected a secondary, CO2-depleted degassing stage of the magma, but still displaying a high CO2/SO2 molar ratio up to 11, plus SO2/HCl = 8 and H2O/SO2 = 126. Explosive degassing from the FV showed variable compositions at different times, due to the changing conditions in ash content, eruption intensity, and interference with the drifting plume from the SV. Supplementary Table 1 lists the October 3 gas compositions measured successively during five intervals of ~10 min each. The increasing intensity of explosive activity during this sequence is reflected in an increasing cleanness of the chemical signature of the main summit degassing, with CO2/SO2 ratios increasing up to 33.6. On the evening of November 6, the eruptive activity shifted from ash-rich to Strombolian/lava fountaining, and we measured the lava fountain degassing from a distance of 5 km (dos Pinos area). We again recorded CO2/SO2 = 33.5. After a pause in explosive activity at the summit on 2nd December, a powerful sequence of continuous jetting of lava and gas started from a new vent cutting the NE flank of the grown main cone. We measured this sequence at 600 m from the vent, at Cabeza de Vaca, and obtained FTIR spectra with high signal-to-noise. The results further provided a high CO2/SO2 ratio of 35.8, with SO2/HCl = 16.8 and H2O/SO2 = 22.4. This is our best compositional record of the FV eruptive plume.
Analyses of silicate melt inclusions and matrix glasses
We measured the volatile contents of olivine-hosted glassy melt inclusions and the groundmass glass of rapidly quenched air fall tephra. Major and minor elements plus sulfur, fluorine and chlorine in melt inclusions and matrix glasses were measured by electron microprobe in two independent laboratories in Paris (France) and Bristol University (UK). Analytical procedures are fully detailed in the Supplementary Information.
Melt inclusions, corrected for post-entrapment crystallisation, are basanitic in composition, and contain 40.2–46.4 wt% SiO2, 2.8–4.5 wt% TiO2, 4.4–6.3 wt% MgO and 1.1–2.1 wt% K2O (Supplementary Fig. 1; Supplementary Table 2). Embayments and matrix glasses have more evolved and overlapping compositions, containing 43.0–49.5 wt.% SiO2, 1.4-4.1 wt% TiO2, 0.8–5.3 wt% MgO, and 1.0–2.9 wt% K2O (Supplementary Fig. 1). The olivines hosting melt inclusions and embayments have compositions between Fo78 and Fo85 (Supplementary Fig. 2). The mean melt inclusion S content is 3290 µg/g; one sulfur-rich inclusion contains 4,871 µg/g S, and the highest S content in the main melt inclusion population is 3715 µg/g (Supplementary Figs. 1 and 2). Groundmass glasses have a mean S content of 474 µg/g, indicating that ~85% of magmatic sulfur was outgassed during magma ascent and eruption (Supplementary Information), as also tracked by glassy embayments trapped at the rim of crystals in comparison to sulfur, chlorine and fluorine show only minor outgassing during ascent:dissolved concentrations respectively vary from ca 450–1050 µg/g Cl and 1000–1500 µg/g F in melt inclusions, to ca. 1400 µg/g Cl and 1000–1500 µg/g F in groundmass glass and melt embayment (fluorine reaching up to 2200 µg/g in one embayment). Fluorine and chlorine become progressively more enriched as melt inclusions and glass compositions become more evolved, indicating that melt F and Cl contents are primarily governed by a fractional crystallisation relationship. Embayments and groundmass glasses have similar F and Cl contents, suggesting that syn-eruptive F and Cl outgassing at the vents was inefficient. H2O and CO2 were determined in three melt inclusions only (Supplementary Table 2). Analysed groundmass glasses are tephritic in composition. They have degassed all their CO2 and contain 520–1510 µg/g residual H2O.
Degassing modelling
We model the theoretical composition of the exsolved fluid phase in equilibrium with the La Palma basanite using a C-S-O-H saturation model5. This model (publicly available for download at https://github.com/charlesll//chosetto) has been applied before to other volcanoes with widely different magma compositions31,61,62,63. Model runs are initialised for a range of starting conditions and over a range of pressures and redox conditions relevant to La Palma basanites (Supplementary Table 3). Details of all model runs are illustrated in Supplementary Table 3. Model runs are performed using as parental melt (major elements) a typical La Palma basanite. H2O and S contents are from dissolved content in Cumbre Vieja melt inclusions (this study; Supplementary Table 2). CO2 is assumed to vary from 1 to 5 wt% in the different model runs to reproduce the postulated range for primary melts in the Canary64,65. All runs are performed by simulating isothermal (temperature kept constant at 1273 °K) magma decompression from an initial pressure of either 400 MPa (models (1) to (4)) or 5 MPa (models (5) to (9)) down to atmospheric conditions (0.1 MPa). Runs are performed under closed-system conditions (i.e., gas and melt continuously re-equilibrating during the decompression path) in runs (1) to (4) to simulate basanite ascent from source to shallow volcanic conduit. Runs (5) to (9) simulate the basanite degassing path in the shallow conduit, in which separated gas is allowed to freely escape from the melt (open system conditions). These models differ for the quantity (mass fraction) of gas removed at each pressure step, this “gas fraction lost” ranging from 0.1 (run (5)) to 0.9 (run (9)). In both closed and open system degassing, equilibrium compositions of the melt and the coexisting gas are calculated at each step throughout the decompression path. Redox conditions are fixed at 1 log units above the Nickel-Nickel Oxide (NNO) buffer (ΔNNO = +1) to fit the oxidised nature of the La Palma melt37 and intraplate alkaline melts in general64 Run (4) uses slightly less oxidised redox conditions (ΔNNO = +0.5) to explore the effect of redox on the degassing path. Comparison between results obtained in runs (2) and (4) suggests a 0.5 log unit change in redox has limited role in the degassing paths (Fig. 2). In all model runs, the equilibrium exsolved gas varies during the degassing path from CO2-rich at high pressure to H2O-S-rich at low pressure (Fig. 2). The pressure-dependent evolution of the modelled CO2/ST ratios is illustrated in Supplementary Fig. 3. From this, we infer that the FV gas corresponds to the equilibrium gas at 1–3 MPa in runs (1) to (4), implying closed system degassing conditions likely prevailed until very shallow in the upper conduits. The largest CO2 depletions are observed in open system and at low pressure, such conditions reproducing well the CO2-poor compositions of EV gases (Fig. 2 and Supplementary Fig. 3). The modelled dissolved S contents (Supplementary Fig. 4) also imply that S degassing from melt becomes significant only at very shallow levels (<10 MPa). The predicted dissolved S content at atmospheric pressure (0.1 MPa) matches closely the mean groundmass glass S content of 474 ppm (Supplementary Fig. 4).
SO2 flux and plume height
TROPOMI data were analysed with the PlumeTraj approach66,67,68,69, in which back-trajectory analysis is applied to determine the height at which gas would have needed to have been injected into the atmosphere above Cumbre Vieja to arrive at the observed pixel location. The height constraints then allow correction of the retrieved SO2 masses. This is critical because the sensitivity of TROPOMI to SO2 is strongly height dependent, meaning that without an accurate quantification of plume height SO2 masses cannot be accurately quantified. Errors on the retrieved height and SO2 mass are determined using the size of each pixel, the reported retrieved SO2 mass error and the meteorological wind field error. Pixel heights and masses are then distributed in 10 min time bins, combining uncertainties from each pixel’s contribution to a time bin in quadrature. This produces a time series of SO2 flux density, the distribution of SO2 mass as a function of height and time. The initial motivation for retrieving plume height is to correct the retrieved SO2 mass, but it is also an extremely valuable measurement, reflecting the evolution of the explosive mass eruption rate. The intense degassing during the first two weeks of the Cumbre Vieja eruption permitted the quantification of gas emissions emitted up to 36–48 h prior to image collection, providing complete and continuous temporal coverage of the plume height and SO2 emission rate. This was particularly valuable in the early stage of the eruption before ground-based measurements could be deployed.
Data availability
All data reported in the paper are listed in Supplementary Tables. Melt inclusion data are available as Supplementary Dataset 1 and on figshare: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.24442444.v1.
Code availability
The solubility model code is available here: https://github.com/charlesll//chosetto.
References
Sparks, R. S. J. Forecasting volcanic eruptions. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 210, 1–15 (2003).
Jambon, A. Earth degassing and large-scale geochemical cycling of volatile elements. Volatiles Magmas 30, 479–517 (1994).
Ernst, R. E. & Youbi, N. How Large Igneous Provinces affect global climate, sometimes cause mass extinctions, and represent natural markers in the geological record. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 478, 30–52 (2017).
Eguchi, J. & Dasgupta, R. A CO2 solubility model for silicate melts from fluid saturation to graphite or diamond saturation. Chem. Geol. 487, 23–38 (2018).
Moretti, R., Papale, P. & Ottonello, G. A model for the saturation of C-O-H-S fluids in silicate melts. Volcan. Degassing 213, 81–101 (2003).
Hartley, M. E., Maclennan, J., Edmonds, M. & Thordarson, T. Reconstructing the deep CO2 degassing behaviour of large basaltic fissure eruptions. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 393, 120–131 (2014).
Metrich, N. & Wallace, P. J. Minerals, inclusions and volcanic processes. Reviews in Mineralogy & Geochemistry, Mineralogical Society of America. Vol. 69 (eds Putirka, K. D. & Tepley, F. J.) 363–402 (2008).
Maclennan, J. Bubble formation and decrepitation control the CO2 content of olivine-hosted melt inclusions. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 18, 597–616 (2017).
Dayton, K. et al. Deep magma storage during the 2021 La Palma eruption. Sci. Adv. 9, eade7641 (2023).
Hansteen, T. H., Klugel, A. & Schmincke, H. U. Multi-stage magma ascent beneath the Canary Islands: evidence from fluid inclusions. Contrib. Miner. Petrol. 132, 48–64 (1998).
Longpre, M. A., Klugel, A., Diehl, A. & Stix, J. Mixing in mantle magma reservoirs prior to and during the 2011-2012 eruption at El Hierro, Canary Islands. Geology 42, 315–318 (2014).
Spilliaert, N., Allard, P., Metrich, N. & Sobolev, A. V. Melt inclusion record of the conditions of ascent, degassing, and extrusion of volatile-rich alkali basalt during the powerful 2002 flank eruption of Mount Etna (Italy). J. Geophys. Res.-Solid Earth 111 https://doi.org/10.1029/2005jb003934 (2006).
Jaupart, C. & Vergniolle, S. The generation and collapse of a foam layer at the roof of a basaltic magma chamber. J. Fluid Mech. 203, 347–380 (1989).
Aiuppa, A., Casetta, F., Coltorti, M., Stagno, V. & Tamburello, G. Carbon concentration increases with depth of melting in Earth’s upper mantle. Nat. Geosci. 14, 697 (2021).
Saal, A. E., Hauri, E. H., Langmuir, C. H. & Perfit, M. R. Vapour undersaturation in primitive mid-ocean-ridge basalt and the volatile content of Earth’s upper mantle. Nature 419, 451–455 (2002).
Matthews, S., Shorttle, O., Rudge, J. F. & Maclennan, J. Constraining mantle carbon: CO2-trace element systematics in basalts and the roles of magma mixing and degassing. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 480, 1–14 (2017).
Burton, M. R., Mader, H. M. & Polacci, M. The role of gas percolation in quiescent degassing of persistently active basaltic volcanoes. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 264, 46–60 (2007).
Allard, P., Burton, M. & Mure, F. Spectroscopic evidence for a lava fountain driven by previously accumulated magmatic gas. Nature 433, 407–410 (2005).
Burton, M., Allard, P., Mure, F. & La Spina, A. Magmatic gas composition reveals the source depth of slug-driven Strombolian explosive activity. Science 317, 227–230 (2007).
Aiuppa, A. et al. Total volatile flux from Mount Etna. Geophys. Res. Lett. 35 https://doi.org/10.1029/2008gl035871 (2008).
Galle, B. et al. A miniaturised ultraviolet spectrometer for remote sensing of SO2 fluxes: a new tool for volcano surveillance. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 119, 241–254 (2003).
Carn, S. A., Fioletov, V. E., McLinden, C. A., Li, C. & Krotkov, N. A. A decade of global volcanic SO2 emissions measured from space. Sci. Rep. 7 https://doi.org/10.1038/srep44095 (2017).
Burton, M., Hayer, C., Miller, C. & Christenson, B. Insights into the 9 December 2019 eruption of Whakaari/White Island from analysis of TROPOMI SO2 imagery. Sci. Adv. 7 https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abg1218 (2021).
Pardini, F., Burton, M., Arzilli, F., La Spina, G. & Polacci, M. SO2 emissions, plume heights and magmatic processes inferred from satellite data: the 2015 Calbuco eruptions. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 64232, 13 (2018).
Anderson, K. R. & Poland, M. P. Bayesian estimation of magma supply, storage, and eruption rates using a multiphysical volcano model: Kilauea Volcano, 2000–2012. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 447, 161–171 (2016).
Blundy, J., Cashman, K. V., Rust, A. & Witham, F. A case for CO2-rich arc magmas. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 290, 289–301 (2010).
Werner, C. et al. Carbon dioxide emissions from subaerial volcanic regions two decades in review. Deep Carbon: Past to Present. (eds Orcutt, B. N., Daniel, I. & Dasgupta, R.) 188–236 (Cambridge University Press, 2020).
Burton, M. R., Sawyer, G. M. & Granieri, D. Deep carbon emissions from volcanoes. Carbon Earth 75, 323–354 (2013).
Mills, B., Daines, S. J. & Lenton, T. M. Changing tectonic controls on the long-term carbon cycle from Mesozoic to present. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 15, 4866–4884 (2014).
Allard, P. et al. Eruptive and diffuse emissions of CO2 from Mount Etna. Nature 351, 387–391 (1991).
Oppenheimer, C. et al. Mantle to surface degassing of alkalic magmas at Erebus volcano, Antarctica. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 306, 261–271 (2011).
Longpre, M. A., Stix, J., Klugel, A. & Shimizu, N. Mantle to surface degassing of carbon- and sulphur-rich alkaline magma at El Hierro, Canary Islands. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 460, 268–280 (2017).
Day, J. M. D., Pearson, D. G., Macpherson, C. G., Lowry, D. & Carracedo, J. C. Evidence for distinct proportions of subducted oceanic crust and lithosphere in HIMU-type mantle beneath El Hierro and La Palma, Canary Islands. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 74, 6565–6589 (2010).
Romero, J. E. et al. The initial phase of the 2021 Cumbre Vieja ridge eruption (Canary Islands): products and dynamics controlling edifice growth and collapse. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 431 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2022.107642 (2022).
Civico, R. et al. High-resolution digital surface model of the 2021 eruption deposit of Cumbre Vieja volcano, La Palma, Spain. Sci. Data 9 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01551-8 (2022).
Bonadonna, C., Folch, A., Loughlin, S. & Puempel, H. Future developments in modelling and monitoring of volcanic ash clouds: outcomes from the first IAVCEI-WMO workshop on Ash Dispersal Forecast and Civil Aviation. Bull. Volcanol. 74, 1–10 (2012).
Day, J. M. D. et al. Mantle source characteristics and magmatic processes during the 2021 La Palma eruption. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 597 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2022.117793 (2022).
Zanon, V. et al. in EGU General Assembly 2022 (Copernicus, Vienna, Austria, 2022).
D’Auria, L. et al. Rapid magma ascent beneath La Palma revealed by seismic tomography. Sci. Rep. 12 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-21818-9 (2022).
La Spina, A., Burton, M. & Salerno, G. G. Unravelling the processes controlling gas emissions from the central and northeast craters of Mt. Etna. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 198, 368–376 (2010).
Aiuppa, A., Fischer, T. P., Plank, T., Robidoux, P. & Di Napoli, R. Along-arc, inter-arc and arc-to-arc variations in volcanic gas CO2/S-T ratios reveal dual source of carbon in arc volcanism. Earth-Sci. Rev. 168, 24–47 (2017).
Jimenez-Mejias, M., Andujar, J., Scaillet, B. & Casillas, R. Experimental determination of H2O and CO2 solubilities of mafic alkaline magmas from Canary Islands. Comptes Rendus Geosci. 353. https://doi.org/10.5802/crgeos.84 (2021).
Pioli, L., Azzopardi, B. J. & Cashman, K. V. Controls on the explosivity of scoria cone eruptions: Magma segregation at conduit junctions. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 186, 407–415 (2009).
Bonadonna, C. et al. Physical characterization of long-lasting hybrid eruptions: the 2021 Tajogaite eruption of Cumbre Vieja (La Palma, Canary Islands). J Geophys. Res.-Solid Earth 127 https://doi.org/10.1029/2022jb025302 (2022).
Mastin, L. G. et al. A multidisciplinary effort to assign realistic source parameters to models of volcanic ash-cloud transport and dispersion during eruptions. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 186, 10–21 (2009).
Plank, S. et al. Combining thermal, tri-stereo optical and bi-static InSAR satellite imagery for lava volume estimates: the 2021 Cumbre Vieja eruption, La Palma. Sci. Rep. 13, 2057 (2023).
Taracsak, Z. et al. High fluxes of deep volatiles from ocean island volcanoes: insights from El Hierro, Canary Islands. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 258, 19–36 (2019).
Aiuppa, A., Fischer, T. P., Plank, T. & Bani, P. CO2 flux emissions from the Earth’s most actively degassing volcanoes, 2005-2015. Sci. Rep. 9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-41901-y (2019).
Kilbride, B. M., Edmonds, M. & Biggs, J. Observing eruptions of gas-rich compressible magmas from space. Nat. Commun. 7. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms13744 (2016).
Masson, D. G. et al. Slope failures on the flanks of the western Canary Islands. Earth-Sci. Rev. 57, 1–35 (2002).
Mitchell, N. C., Masson, D. G., Watts, A. B., Gee, M. J. R. & Urgeles, R. The morphology of the submarine flanks of volcanic ocean islands—a comparative study of the Canary and Hawaiian hotspot islands. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 115, 83–107 (2002).
Guillou, H., Carracedo, J. C. & Duncan, R. A. K-Ar, 40Ar-39Ar ages and magnetostratigraphy of Brunhes and Matuyama lava sequences from La Palma Island. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 106, 175–194 (2001).
Staudigel, H. & Schmincke, H. U. The pliocene seamount series of la palma Canary-Islands. J. Geophys. Res. 89, 1195–1215 (1984).
Staudigel, H., Feraud, G. & Giannerini, G. The history of intrusive activity on the island of la-palma (Canary-Islands). J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 27, 299–322 (1986).
Tamburello, G. Ratiocalc: software for processing data from multicomponent volcanic gas analyzers. Comput. Geosci. 82, 63–67 (2015).
Francis, P., Burton, M. R. & Oppenheimer, C. Remote measurements of volcanic gas compositions by solar occultation spectroscopy. Nature 396, 567–570 (1998).
Pfeffer, M. A. et al. Ground-based measurements of the 2014-2015 Holuhraun volcanic cloud (Iceland). Geosciences 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences8010029 (2018).
La Spina, A., Burton, M., Allard, P., Alparone, S. & Mure, F. Open-path FTIR spectroscopy of magma degassing processes during eight lava fountains on Mount Etna. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 413, 123–134 (2015).
La Spina, A. et al. New insights into volcanic processes at Stromboli from Cerberus, a remote-controlled open-path FTIR scanner system. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 249, 66–76 (2013).
Rothman, L. S. et al. The HITRAN2012 molecular spectroscopic database. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer 130, 4–50 (2013).
de Moor, J. M. et al. Turmoil at Turrialba Volcano (Costa Rica): degassing and eruptive processes inferred from high-frequency gas monitoring. J. Geophys. Res.-Solid Earth 121, 5761–5775 (2016).
Moretti, R. et al. The 2018 unrest phase at La Soufriere of Guadeloupe (French West Indies) andesitic volcano: Scrutiny of a failed but prodromal phreatic eruption. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2020.106769 (2020).
Moretti, R. & Papale, P. On the oxidation state and volatile behavior in multicomponent gas-melt equilibria. Chem. Geol. 213, 265–280 (2004).
Taracsak, Z. et al. Highly Oxidising Conditions in Volatile-Rich El Hierro Magmas: implications for Ocean Island Magmatism. J. Petrol. 63. https://doi.org/10.1093/petrology/egac011 (2022).
Longpre, M. A. & Felpeto, A. Historical volcanism in the Canary Islands; part 1: a review of precursory and eruptive activity, eruption parameter estimates, and implications for hazard assessment. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2021.107363 (2021).
Hayer, C., Burton, M., Ferrazzini, V., Esse, B. & Di Muro, A. Unusually high SO2 emissions and plume height from Piton de la Fournaise volcano during the April 2020 eruption. Bull. Volcanol. 85, 21 (2023).
Esse, B. et al. Satellite-derived SO2 emissions from the relatively low-intensity, effusive 2021 eruption of Fagradalsfjall, Iceland. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2023.118325 (2023).
Queisser, M. et al. TROPOMI enables high-resolution SO2 flux observations from Mt. Etna, Italy, and beyond. Sci. Rep. 9 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-37807-w (2019).
Pardini, F. et al. Initial constraints on triggering mechanisms of the eruption of Fuego volcano (Guatemala) from 3 June 2018 using IASI satellite data. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 376, 54–61 (2019).
Acknowledgements
M.B., B.E. and C.H. gratefully acknowledge funding support from UKRI NERC VPLUS, grant NE/S004106/1. We are very grateful to the NERC Field Spectroscopy Facility https://fsf.nerc.ac.uk/ for the loan of an FTIR spectrometer and support in the field. J.R. was supported by the University of Manchester’s Deans Doctoral Award. J.R.A.A., M.Bitetto and J.P.L. received funding from the Italian Ministero Università Ricerca (MUR, Projects PRIN2017LMNLAW and PRIN2022HA8XCS), and from the RETURN Extended Partnership funded by the European Union Next-Generation EU (National Recovery and Resilience Plan – NRRP, Mission 4, Component 2, Investment 1.3 – D.D. 1243 2/8/2022, PE0000005). M.A.-R., J.B., P.A.H., E.P., L.D. and N.M.P. received funding from the projects VOLRISKMAC II (MAC2/3.5b/328), co-financed by the EC Cooperation Transnational Program MAC 2014-2020, “Cumbre Vieja Emergencia”, financed by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation, TFassistance financed by Cabildo Insular de Tenerife and LPvolcano financed by the Cabildo Insular de La Palma. This work has been partially funded by the Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (FCT), Portugal, through project MAGAT project (Ref. CIRCNA/OCT/2016/2019).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
MB led the production and writing of the paper, interpretations and modelling were developed by M.B., A.A., PA., M.A.-R., A.P.C., A.L.S., E.J.N. and V.Z. who also contributed to writing the paper. FTIR data were collected and analysed by M.A.-R., A.P.C., A.L.S., M.B., P.A. and J.B. Multigas and SO2 camera data were collected by A.A., E.J.N., MBitetto, J.P.L., E.P. and K.W. TROPOMI SO2 fluxes were produced by C.H., B.E. and M.B. Melt inclusion measurements were performed by M.H., V.Z., A.S., E.W., K.C., J.R., E.F.R.-K. and F.S. P.A.H., L.D. and N.M.P. provided helped plan the field activity and provide logistical and scientific support which allowed fieldwork to be conducted safely during the eruption.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
E.J.N. is an Editorial Board Member for Communications Earth & Environment, but was not involved in the editorial review of, nor the decision to publish, this article. All other authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Communications Earth & Environment thanks Thor Hansteen and Ramón Casillas for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editor Joe Aslin. A peer review file is available.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Burton, M., Aiuppa, A., Allard, P. et al. Exceptional eruptive CO2 emissions from intra-plate alkaline magmatism in the Canary volcanic archipelago. Commun Earth Environ 4, 467 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-023-01103-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-023-01103-x
This article is cited by
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.