Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

Best practices in collecting and reporting continuous glucose monitoring data in research settings

Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) is increasingly being used to collect and evaluate data on glycaemic control for research purposes. However, the use of CGM in research settings requires proper understanding and handling of these devices for correct data collection and interpretation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. European Medicines Agency. Clinical investigation of medicinal products in the treatment or prevention of diabetes mellitus - scientific guideline. ema.europa.eu, https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/clinical-investigation-medicinal-products-treatment-or-prevention-diabetes-mellitus-scientific-guideline (2023).

  2. Battelino, T. et al. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 11, 42–57 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Danne, T. et al. Diabetes Care 40, 1631–1640 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Vigers, T. et al. PLoS ONE 14, e0216851 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Riddlesworth, T. D. et al. Diabetes Technol. Ther. 20, 314–316 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Battelino, T. et al. Diabetes Care 42, 1593–1603 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Holt, R. I. G. et al. Diabetologia 64, 2609–2652 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Jackson, M. A., Ahmann, A. & Shah, V. N. Diabetes Technol. Ther. 23, S27–S34 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. Diabetes mellitus: efficacy endpoints for clinical trials investigating antidiabetic drugs and biological products; draft guidance for industry. regulations.gov, https://www.regulations.gov/docket/FDA-2023-D-0625 (2023).

  10. Cichosz, S. L., Jensen, M. H. & Hejlesen, O. J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 17, 690–695 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lachin, J. M., Bebu, I., Gao, X., Nathan, D. M. & Zinman, B. Diabetes Care 45, 2445–2448 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Divilly, P. et al. Diabet. Med. 39, e14892 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Barua, S. et al. EClinicalMedicine 35, 100853 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Sofizadeh, S., Pehrsson, A., Ólafsdóttir, A. F. & Lind, M. J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 16, 373–382 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Vettoretti, M., Cappon, G., Acciaroli, G., Facchinetti, A. & Sparacino, G. J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 12, 1064–1071 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Margaretha M. Visser.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

UZ Leuven received non-financial support for travel from Novo Nordisk, and Boehringer-Ingelheim for M.M.V. M.M.V. serves or has served on the speakers bureau for Dexcom — financial compensation for these activities has been received by KU Leuven. P.G. serves or has served on the advisory panel for Novo Nordisk, Sanofi-Aventis, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Roche, Medtronic, Abbott and Bayer. Financial compensation for these activities has been received by KU Leuven. P.G. serves or has served on the speakers bureau for Merck Sharp and Dohme, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Bayer, Medtronic, Insulet, Novo Nordisk, Abbott, Roche, VitalAire and Dexcom. Financial compensation for these activities has been received by KU Leuven. KU Leuven received for P.G. non-financial support for travel from Sanofi-Aventis, A. Menarini Diagnostics, Novo Nordisk, Medtronic, and Roche. All disclosures were unrelated to the present work.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Metabolism thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Visser, M.M., Gillard, P. Best practices in collecting and reporting continuous glucose monitoring data in research settings. Nat Metab 6, 189–191 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42255-024-00973-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42255-024-00973-5

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing