Abstract
The discovery of unconventional superconductivity in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene (tBLG) supported the twist-angle-induced flat band structure predictions made a decade earlier. Numerous physical properties have since been linked to the interlayer twist angle using the flat band prediction as a guideline. However, some key observations like the nematic phase and striped charge order behind the superconductivity are missing in this initial model. Here we show that a thermodynamically stable large out-of-plane displacement, or corrugation of the bilayer, induced by the interlayer twist, demonstrates partially filled states of the flat band structure, accompanied by a broken symmetry, in the magic-angle regime and the presence of symmetry breaking associated with the superconductivity in tBLG. The distinction between low and high corrugation can also explain the observed evolution of the vibrational spectra of tBLG as a function of twist angle. Our observation that large out-of-plane deformation modes enable partial filling of states near the Fermi energy may lead to a strategy for offsetting the effects of disorder in the local twist angle, which suppresses unconventional superconductivity and correlated insulator behavior in magic-angle tBLG.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
At a magic-angle of 1.08∘, theoreticians found moiré flat bands in twisted bilayer graphene (tBLG) with the help of tight-binding models1,2. These nondispersive flat bands are associated with strong correlation due to the Coulomb interaction between the charge carriers3. Numerous studies also suggested the presence of several exotic physical phenomena at the magic-angle condition in tBLG4,5,6. But the significance of the magic angle was fully appreciated when unconventional superconductivity was discovered in tBLG at the same twist angle7. It was later shown that partial filling of the flat bands is responsible for physical phenomena such as striped charge order, pseudogap states, and nematic phase, relating to high-temperature superconductivity in magic-angle tBLG8,9,10. Aside from these rich correlated electron behaviors, magic-angle tBLG also exhibits phononic effects such as the Jahn-Teller effect11 and phonon-driven superconductivity12,13. The central understanding in this field is that interlayer twist angle, which tunes the moiré superlattice formed by regions of commensurability and incommensurability between the lattices, controls the important electronic properties.
At low twist angles, the moiré superlattice relaxes by forming large triangular commensurate AB/BA regions, while the incommensurate AA and SP regions shrink14,15,16. The effect of this in-plane deformation on electronic properties in tBLG has been extensively studied17,18. By contrast, the role of corrugation, or out-of-plane deformation, is unknown despite the fact that previous continuum calculations19 show large out-of-plane deformation. More recently, band flattening and correlated states observed in buckled monolayer graphene20,21 have hinted at the importance of out-of-plane deformation effects on the electronic structure of tBLG.
In this work, we show that large out-of-plane deformation, with displacements of up to several Angstroms, is thermodynamically stable in the low twist angle regime when periods of moiré supercells are sufficiently large. We establish how the detailed nature of the corrugation is connected to partial filling of the flat bands and demonstrate symmetry breaking in the magic-angle tBLG with a simple single particle model. Furthermore, our results explain the experimentally observed vibrational spectra of tBLG as a function of twist angle.
Results and Discussion
Out-of-plane deformation modes in twisted bilayer graphene
The high corrugation mode in tBLG at 1.08∘ is shown and compared to the conventional corrugation mode in Fig. 1a, based on the results of atomistic calculations described in detail in the "methods" section. Following the predictions of the stability of high corrugation modes at low twist angles19, we refer to the higher corrugation mode as the bending mode (indicated by orange box throughout the manuscript) and the conventional corrugation mode as the breathing mode (indicated by green box throughout the manuscript). The corrugation, or out-of-plane displacement, in the bending mode is an order of magnitude higher than in the breathing mode, as seen in Fig. 1. The largest out-of-plane displacement appears in the AA region of the tBLG. Despite the large corrugation in the bending mode, the variation of interlayer distance in between the tBLG layers remains the same for both breathing and bending mode, as shown in the Supplementary Note 1 and Fig. S1 of the supplementary information. To mimic the tBLG experiments, we incorporate a substrate and take into account the Lennard-Jones interaction between the substrate and the tBLG. The case of the freestanding tBLG structure is also presented in Fig. S2 of the Supplementary information and we explain the effect of the substrate on the corrugation in the Supplementary Note 2.
In Fig. 1b, the energetic favorability of the bending mode at low twist angles (θ ≤ 1.61∘) is demonstrated via the energy density difference between the breathing and bending modes, \({{\Delta }}\gamma =\frac{{E}_{Br}-{E}_{Be}}{A}\), where EBr and EBe are the minimized total energies of the tBLG in the breathing and bending modes respectively, and A is the projected area of the tBLG. We also plot the total energy of the tBLG with reference to AB bilayer graphene of the same area as a function of twist angle, which shows a clear transition of stability from breathing to bending mode as twist angle drops below 1.61∘. At 1.6∘ twist angle, the AA regions of the tBLG overlap with each other19, which also points out the transition twist angle between breathing and bending mode. The bending mode also remains as the stable mode at low twist angles if no substrate is present, or if the system has a substrate above and below, as shown in the Supplementary Note 3 and Fig. S3 of the supplementary information. We explain the twist angle dependence of Δγ in terms of dislocation mechanics in the following sections and in the Supplementary Note 4 and Fig. S4–S7 of the supplementary information.
Despite the clear stability of the bending mode, the higher corrugations are not obvious from the top views of tBLG, as shown in Fig. 1c, d. Both breathing and bending modes show moiré patterns with the typical C6 symmetry. Similarly, their differences are not readily apparent from projection-based topology measurement devices such as scanning tunelling microscope (STM). STM measurements combine both electronic and atom position effects. While researchers have attempted to separate their relative contributions by neglecting the electronic effects22, the electronic effects are indeed an important consideration23,24. The quantification of corrugation amplitude is typically done computationally24,25 using density functional theory (DFT) or molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, but these methods are prone to becoming trapped in local minima26,27,28. Although atomic force microscopy (AFM) experiments have been successfully used to quantify corrugation in graphite29,30, the quantification of corrugation in tBLG has not been reported, and the higher corrugation mode – which is thermodynamically more stable in the low twist angle regime – has thus been largely overlooked.
Effect of corrugation on the electronic structure
Our electronic structure calculations show the effect of the bending mode corrugation on the band structure of magic-angle tBLG. In Fig. 2a, the band structure is calculated by a tight binding model31, using atom positions of relaxed configurations obtained from classical potentials. Flat bands form around the Fermi level, as highlighted in the red box. In Fig. 2b, c, we focus on a small energy range around the Fermi level to show the difference between the flat bands of the breathing and the bending modes. We show, for the breathing mode, that each band is either filled or empty, preserving particle-hole symmetry except for the 1.12∘ twist angle case. In tBLG of twist angle 1.12∘, the flat band is the narrowest in the breathing mode, and features partial filling of the states. By contrast, we see the partial filling of the flat bands for bending mode corrugation over a range of twist angles (1.05∘–1.16∘) near the magic angle. This is in agreement with Carr et al.17 who show that the magic angle is not a single value, but rather a range of approximately 0.1∘. So partial filling of the flat bands is a more robust feature in bending mode corrugation occurring not just at a specific twist angle, but over a range of twist angles. This leads to the possibility that bending mode corrugation may play a role in stabilizing superconducting states, given that recent reports suggest that metallic states in twisted bilayer graphene can stabilize the superconductivity32. The flat bandwidth at the high symmetry point Γ is plotted as a function of twist angle in Fig. 2d. Both breathing and bending modes have flat bandwidth of 8 meV at 1.08∘, showing close agreement with the experiments7,33. But the minimum flat bandwidth occurs at 1.12∘ in the breathing mode and at 1.08∘ in the bending mode corrugation. We note that a minimum flat bandwidth can also be found in a flat tBLG structure near the magic angle with no corrugation2,17. Similar features like minimum Fermi velocity and maximum Fermion mass are also apparently dependent on the twist angles of the tBLG instead of the out-of-plane atomic corrugation. However, while these properties suggest the presence of correlated states in magic-angle tBLG, large out-of-plane deformation accompanied by in-plane radial strain show partial filling of the flat bands in the magic-angle regime, hinting at the possibility that superconductivity can be stabilized as a result of the corrugation.
To understand the partially filled flat bands, we also plot the orbital projected density in Fig. 2e,f for tBLG at 1.12∘ in the breathing mode and at 1.08∘ in the bending modes. In the breathing mode, charge density localizes in the AA region of the tBLG. In contrast, the higher corrugation in the bending mode drives a charge redistribution in the AA region, breaking the C6 symmetry. In theory, electron localization, as seen in the breathing mode at 1.12∘, is driven by a smaller atomic corrugation like the breathing mode corrugation34,35. But the localization preserves C6 symmetry and fails to explain essential clues to the superconductivity like spectral weight transfer, striped charge order8, and the presence of nematic phase9,10. In Fig. 2f, the underlying electronic structure reveals a particular breaking of the symmetry by concentrating charge density along a major axis, though the topography shown in Fig. 1d still conforms to a C6 symmetry. Fig. 2f shows a quadrupole geometry in the AA region via the formation of alternating high and low orbital projected density quadrants. This important feature is typically observed in the high-temperature superconductors36,37. To illustrate the broken symmetry, the spatial dependence of the orbital projected density in the AA region is plotted in Fig. 2g. Each line in this figure is a horizontal spatial scan of the AA region, as shown by a red box in Fig. 2f. This spatial scan clearly indicates a charge splitting as the high charge density peaks transfer from left to right along the downward direction. This type of charge transfer can be attributed to spectral weight transfer in the AA region, another phenomenon observed in the unconventional superconductivity of magic-angle tBLG8. Moreover, the center of the AA region (the blue section of the arrow) shows equally distributed peaks, demonstrating a typical feature of pseudogap states in the magic-angle tBLG. This particular broken symmetry and the charge redistribution showing spectral weight transfer can only be observed at the magic-angle regime in presence of the bending mode corrugation (as shown in the Supplementary Note 5 and Fig. S8). Our findings suggest an alternative to the current picture that relies on the simpler breathing mode with a more complex correlated electronic model to explain the broken symmetry10,38,39: we are suggesting a more complex deformation mode, which – even with simpler single particle physics – provides an explanation for the necessary symmetry breaking.
Deformation mechanics in twisted bilayer graphene
To understand the importance of the bending mode of corrugation, we consider the underlying mechanism of this deformation. We show, in Fig. 3a, that the average bond length in the atomistic structure of tBLG varies with twist angle, reaching a maximum at 1.47∘ for the breathing mode and at 1.08∘ for the bending mode. The large deformation in the bending mode, responsible for the reduction in symmetry and charge redistribution, is also responsible for stretching the bonds and for the occurrence of maximum bond length at 1.08∘. We also plotted the experimentally observed micro-Raman ΓG peak as a function of twist angles40, where the full-width half-maximum (FWHM) also occurs at 1.08∘. The micro-Raman G peak relates to the bond stretching between pairs of sp2 atoms41,42. It shows that the bond length and ΓG peak follow the same trend up to 1.47∘. This agreement indicates that the angle dependence of the Raman peak can be explained by the bending mode corrugation. Thus, it provides an indirect support for our suggestion that the large corrugation in bending mode is indeed present in experimental conditions, even though it has not been directly examined until now.
In Fig. 3b, the spatial distributions of stress components (σxx and σyy) are shown for the top and bottom layers of magic-angle tBLG in the breathing mode (green) and bending mode (orange). This also reveals a symmetry breaking in the bending mode and demonstrates a tensile stress in the AA region of the tBLG. This causes an in-plane radial expansion of the atoms in the AA region as opposed to pure rotational motion driven by shear stress in the case of the breathing mode. (The in-plane displacements of the atoms in the bending mode have non-zero divergence, as shown in Fig. S4.) Such radial deformation requires high energy for a flat geometry, but requires small energy to relax the structure in the presence of high corrugation. The charge redistribution in tBLG, shown in Fig. 2, can be attributed to this radial deformation in the AA region, which helps to stabilize the symmetry breaking. Numerous studies report on the role of strain in stabilizing symmetry breaking associated with unconventional superconductivity10,39. The connection between bending mode corrugation and in-plane radial strain is further explained in Supplementary Note 6 and illustrated in Fig. S9 and S10. Similarly, higher corrugation in monolayer graphene has been observed in alternating graphene/hexagonal boron nitride heterostructure20,43, where the graphene layer is also strained to obtain a superlattice structure with periodicity. Fig. 3c shows the energy distribution in magic-angle tBLG, which clearly highlights the SP regions, or interlayer dislocations separating regions of AB stacking19,44, and their distinctly different morphologies in the breathing and bending modes. In the bending mode, the SP regions are kinked, in the form of mixed-type (screw+edge) dislocations, while in the breathing mode, the SP regions are straight, in the form of screw-type dislocations.
This specific topology of the dislocation is a key factor in the thermodynamic stability of the bending mode instead of the breathing mode for small twist angles (as shown in fig. 1b). We note that energy difference between the modes can be explained by the 3D dislocation line length and the Moiré wavelength, which have a special relationship in a narrow twist angle range close to the magic-angle. In Fig. S5 of the Supplementary information, we plot a ratio of the two quantities. While this ratio tends to a limit of 1 for very small and large angle limits, it reaches a maximum value at a twist angle 1.47∘, close to the crossover angle that corresponds to the switch between the two deformation modes. The stability between bending and breathing mode is driven by the dislocation mechanics, and a more detailed description of which is found in the Supplementary Note 4.
Conclusions
In magic-angle tBLG, the phase diagram hosts both correlated insulating and superconducting phases, supporting the unconventional nature of superconductivity in the system7,45,46,47. Recent studies, however, illustrate that conventional superconductivity can also appear in magic-angle tBLG, in the absence of correlated insulating phase12,48,49. We report on the critical role of strain in the symmetry breaking associated with unconventional superconductivity in tBLG. We show evidence of the energetically favorable higher corrugation mode, demonstrating pseudogap states and spectral weight transfer by single particle physics. These phenomena are closely connected to similar observations in high-temperature superconductors36,37,50. In a recent study20, highly corrugated monolayer graphene with hexagonal boron nitride (h-BN) as a substrate has also shown the presence of correlated states and broken symmetry. Therefore, large out-of-plane deformation should also be considered in explaining the special properties associated with superconducting states in magic-angle tBLG. The bending mode of corrugation also appears to have an effect equivalent to unscreened electric field induced by the angle disorder51 in magic-angle tBLG as it drives the Fermi level away from charge neutrality. In fact, this type of deformation is a possible way to replace the application of back-gate voltage to tune the generated electric field. Our study suggests that additional work to understand the effect of high corrugation in tBLG is warranted. It may be possible to experimentally address this effect, for example, through application of electric fields, or through the use of substrates to which the tBLG has varying adhesion. This opens the fascinating possibility of controlling superconducting states in magic-angle tBLG, to the extent that we can control the magnitude of corrugation in the tBLG system.
Methods
When two graphene layers rotate relative to one other by a twist angle θ, the system is referred to as twisted bilayer graphene (tBLG). Due to the resulting atomistic incommensurability between layers, a moiré pattern emerges. Our calculations are performed on periodic tBLG in which the two layers form a larger scale commensurate supercell with one other. The commensurate tBLG supercell only occurs at particular twist angles θ34,52. This particular value of θ is an angle in between two lattice vectors d1 = na1 + ma2 and d2 = ma1 + na2, where, n and m are arbitrary integers. As the two vectors d1 and d2 merge after rotation, the lattice vectors of the periodic supercell are \({L}_{1}=m{a}_{1}^{(1)}+n{a}_{2}^{(1)}=n{a}_{1}^{(2)}+m{a}_{2}^{(2)}\) and \({L}_{2}=R(\frac{\pi }{3}){L}_{1}\), where, \(R(\frac{\pi }{3})\) is the two-dimensional rotation matrix of angle π/3. The rotation angle θ, the supercell size Lcell, and the number of atoms N for such a commensurate periodic tBLG can be represented as
Here, a0 is the bond distance in the graphene layers.
We use Large-scale Atomic Molecular Massively Parallel Simulator (LAMMPS)53 to carry out molecular statics calculations to obtain relaxed atomic coordinates. For accurate simulation of interatomic interactions, we use the reactive empirical bond order (REBO) potential54 and the Kolmogorov-Crespi (KC) potential55 for intralayer and interlayer interactions respectively. The REBO potential is known to underestimate the experimental/DFT Young’s modulus and overestimate the experimental/DFT Poisson’s ratio56. However, the binding energy, bending rigidity and bond length obtained with the REBO potential agree well with the experimental and DFT values56. To our understanding, it is difficult to identify a single classical potential, which will perform better in terms of all mechanical properties, although we acknowledge that the development of machine-learned potentials57 clearly shows promise in the classical molecular dynamics simulations field. In the KC potential55,the orientation of the pz orbital is determined by the local environment, where the local normal to an atom is defined by a patch of neighboring atoms. Here, we adopt the parameters of the KC potential from Ouyang et al.58. The atom coordinates are relaxed by minimizing the energy with a conjugate gradient (CG) minimization scheme,59 where the stopping tolerance for energy is 10−11 eV. To obtain the bending mode corrugation in the relaxed structure, a flat tBLG structure is initially perturbed by introducing large bulges in the AA region. Energy minimization of these perturbed structures leads to bending mode corrugation. The magnitude of the bending mode corrugation can be controlled through interactions with a substrate. In this study, we use a Lennard-Jones (LJ) potential to simulate the van der Waals interactions between a substrate and the tBLG.
The atomic coordinates obtained from MD simulations are utilized as an input to the band structure calculation using the tight-binding method. The tight binding Hamiltonian is written as-
where, ri are the atomic coordinates obtained from MD simulations and \(|{r}_{i}\rangle\) is the wave function at atomic site i. t(ri − rj) is the hopping integral between atoms i and j, which also accounts for any change in the distance between two atoms due to corrugation. For the hopping integral, we use the formula obtained from Nam et al.31
Here, d = ri − rj is the distance between two atoms, ez is a vector along the normal to the plane of atoms, a0 is the average bond distance, d0 is the average interlayer distance. \({V}_{pp\pi }^{0}\) = −2.7 eV and \({V}_{pp\sigma }^{0}\) = 0.48 eV is the hopping integral between the nearest neighbor atoms within the layers and in between the layers respectively. Tight binding models are sensitive to the choice of hopping terms. Here, we choose the terms from the Nam and Koshino pz tight binding model31, which accurately captures the Fermi velocity reduction when lattice relaxation is accounted for. The same hopping terms used in a different tight binding model35 have led to an accurate magic-angle prediction where flat bands are narrowest. This combination of hopping parameters has been widely used in the literature60,61,62. We also choose a cut-off distance greater than \(\sqrt{3}a\) (a = lattice constant of graphene), where the hopping integral is negligible.
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Suárez Morell, E., Correa, J. D., Vargas, P., Pacheco, M. & Barticevic, Z. Flat bands in slightly twisted bilayer graphene: Tight-binding calculations. Phys. Rev. B 82, 121407 (2010).
Bistritzer, R. & MacDonald, A. H. Moiré bands in twisted double-layer graphene. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 108, 12233–12237 (2011).
Choi, Y. et al. Electronic correlations in twisted bilayer graphene near the magic angle. Nat. Phys. 15, 1174–1180 (2019).
Kim, K. et al. Tunable moiré bands and strong correlations in small-twist-angle bilayer graphene. PNAS 114, 3364–3369 (2017).
Weckbecker, D. et al. Low-energy theory for the graphene twist bilayer. Phys. Rev. B 93, 035452 (2016).
Yin, L.-J., Qiao, J.-B., Zuo, W.-J., Li, W.-T. & He, L. Experimental evidence for non-Abelian gauge potentials in twisted graphene bilayers. Phys. Rev. B 92, 081406 (2015).
Cao, Y. et al. Unconventional superconductivity in magic-angle graphene superlattices. Nature 556, 43–50 (2018).
Jiang, Y. et al. Charge order and broken rotational symmetry in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene. Nature 573, 91–95 (2019).
Chichinadze, D. V., Classen, L. & Chubukov, A. V. Nematic superconductivity in twisted bilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. B 101, 224513 (2020).
Cao, Y. et al. Nematicity and competing orders in superconducting magic-angle graphene. Science 372, 264–271 (2021).
Angeli, M., Tosatti, E. & Fabrizio, M. Valley Jahn-Teller Effect in Twisted Bilayer Graphene. Phys. Rev. X 9, 041010 (2019).
Wu, F., MacDonald, A. H. & Martin, I. Theory of Phonon-Mediated Superconductivity in Twisted Bilayer Graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 257001 (2018).
Lian, B., Wang, Z. & Bernevig, B. A. Twisted Bilayer Graphene: A Phonon-Driven Superconductor. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 257002 (2019).
Zhang, K. & Tadmor, E. B. Structural and electron diffraction scaling of twisted graphene bilayers. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 112, 225–238 (2018).
Annevelink, E., Johnson, H. T. & Ertekin, E. Topologically derived dislocation theory for twist and stretch moiré superlattices in bilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. B 102, 184107 (2020).
Yoo, H. et al. Atomic and electronic reconstruction at the van der Waals interface in twisted bilayer graphene. Nat. Mater. 18, 448–453 (2019).
Carr, S., Fang, S., Zhu, Z. & Kaxiras, E. Exact continuum model for low-energy electronic states of twisted bilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. Res. 1, 013001 (2019).
Pathak, S. et al. Accurate tight-binding model for twisted bilayer graphene describes topological flat bands without geometric relaxation. Phys. Rev. B 105, 115141 (2022).
Dai, S., Xiang, Y. & Srolovitz, D. J. Twisted Bilayer Graphene: Moiré with a Twist. Nano Lett. 16, 5923–5927 (2016). Publisher: American Chemical Society.
Mao, J. et al. Evidence of flat bands and correlated states in buckled graphene superlattices. Nature 584, 215–220 (2020).
Milovanović, S., Anđelković, M., Covaci, L. & Peeters, F. Band flattening in buckled monolayer graphene. Phys. Rev. B 102, 245427 (2020).
Neek-Amal, M. et al. Membrane amplitude and triaxial stress in twisted bilayer graphene deciphered using first-principles directed elasticity theory and scanning tunneling microscopy. Phys. Rev. B 90, 064101 (2014).
Gargiulo, F. & Yazyev, O. V. Structural and electronic transformation in low-angle twisted bilayer graphene. 2D Mater. 5, 015019 (2017).
Brihuega, I. et al. Unraveling the Intrinsic and Robust Nature of van Hove Singularities in Twisted Bilayer Graphene by Scanning Tunneling Microscopy and Theoretical Analysis. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 196802 (2012).
Cisternas, E. & Correa, J. D. Theoretical reproduction of superstructures revealed by STM on bilayer graphene. Chem. Phys. 409, 74–78 (2012).
Ghasemi, S. A. et al. Energy landscape of silicon systems and its description by force fields, tight binding schemes, density functional methods, and quantum Monte Carlo methods. Phys. Rev. B 81, 214107 (2010).
Zhu, S., Pochet, P. & Johnson, H. T. Controlling Rotation of Two-Dimensional Material Flakes. ACS Nano 13, 6925–6931 (2019).
Edelberg, D., Kumar, H., Shenoy, V., Ochoa, H. & Pasupathy, A. N. Tunable strain soliton networks confine electrons in van der Waals materials. Nat. Phys. 16, 1097–1102 (2020).
Sasaki, N., Kobayashi, K. & Tsukada, M. Atomic-scale friction image of graphite in atomic-force microscopy. Phys. Rev. B 54, 2138–2149 (1996).
Enachescu, M., Schleef, D., Ogletree, D. F. & Salmeron, M. Integration of point-contact microscopy and atomic-force microscopy: Application to characterization of graphite/Pt(111). Phys. Rev. B 60, 16913–16919 (1999).
Nam, N. N. T. & Koshino, M. Lattice relaxation and energy band modulation in twisted bilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. B 96, 075311 (2017).
Arora, H. S. et al. Superconductivity in metallic twisted bilayer graphene stabilized by WSe2. Nature 583, 379–384 (2020).
Yankowitz, M. et al. Tuning superconductivity in twisted bilayer graphene. Science 363, 1059–1064 (2019).
Uchida, K., Furuya, S., Iwata, J.-I. & Oshiyama, A. Atomic corrugation and electron localization due to moiré patterns in twisted bilayer graphenes. Phys. Rev. B 90, 155451 (2014).
Nguyen, V. H. et al. Electronic localization in small-angle twisted bilayer graphene. 2D Mater. 8, 035046 (2021).
Emery, V. J., Kivelson, S. A. & Tranquada, J. M. Stripe phases in high-temperature superconductors. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 8814–8817 (1999).
Comin, R. et al. Symmetry of charge order in cuprates. Nat. Mater. 14, 796–800 (2015).
Xie, M. & MacDonald, A. Nature of the Correlated Insulator States in Twisted Bilayer Graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 097601 (2020).
Liu, S., Khalaf, E., Lee, J. Y. & Vishwanath, A. Nematic topological semimetal and insulator in magic-angle bilayer graphene at charge neutrality. Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 013033 (2021).
Gadelha, A. C. et al. Localization of lattice dynamics in low-angle twisted bilayer graphene. Nature 590, 405–409 (2021).
Ferrari, A. C. & Robertson, J. Interpretation of Raman spectra of disordered and amorphous carbon. Phys. Rev. B 61, 14095–14107 (2000).
Ferrari, A. C. Raman spectroscopy of graphene and graphite: Disorder, electron-phonon coupling, doping and nonadiabatic effects. Solid State Commun. 143, 47–57 (2007).
Ouyang, W., Hod, O. & Urbakh, M. Parity-dependent moiré superlattices in graphene/h-BN heterostructures: A route to mechanomutable metamaterials. Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 216101 (2021).
Pochet, P., McGuigan, B. C., Coraux, J. & Johnson, H. T. Toward Moiré engineering in 2D materials via dislocation theory. Appl. Mater. Today 9, 240–250 (2017).
Cao, Y. et al. Correlated insulator behaviour at half-filling in magic-angle graphene superlattices. Nature 556, 80–84 (2018).
Guo, H., Zhu, X., Feng, S. & Scalettar, R. T. Pairing symmetry of interacting fermions on a twisted bilayer graphene superlattice. Phys. Rev. B 97, 235453 (2018).
Isobe, H., Yuan, N. F. Q. & Fu, L. Unconventional Superconductivity and Density Waves in Twisted Bilayer Graphene. Phys. Rev. X 8, 041041 (2018).
Stepanov, P. et al. Untying the insulating and superconducting orders in magic-angle graphene. Nature 583, 375–378 (2020).
Saito, Y., Ge, J., Watanabe, K., Taniguchi, T. & Young, A. F. Independent superconductors and correlated insulators in twisted bilayer graphene. Nat. Phys. 16, 926–930 (2020).
Vershinin, M. et al. Local ordering in the pseudogap state of the high-Tc superconductor Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ. Science 303, 1995–1998 (2004).
Uri, A. et al. Mapping the twist-angle disorder and Landau levels in magic-angle graphene. Nature 581, 47–52 (2020).
Hermann, K. Periodic overlayers and moiré patterns: theoretical studies of geometric properties. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 24, 314210 (2012).
Plimpton, S. Fast Parallel Algorithms for Short-Range Molecular Dynamics. J. Computational Phys. 117, 1–19 (1995).
Brenner, D. W. et al. A second-generation reactive empirical bond order (REBO) potential energy expression for hydrocarbons. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 14, 783–802 (2002).
Kolmogorov, A. N. & Crespi, V. H. Registry-dependent interlayer potential for graphitic systems. Phys. Rev. B 71, 235415 (2005).
Lebedeva, I. V., Minkin, A. S., Popov, A. M. & Knizhnik, A. A. Elastic constants of graphene: Comparison of empirical potentials and DFT calculations. Phys. E: Low.-dimensional Syst. Nanostruct. 108, 326–338 (2019).
Rowe, P., Deringer, V. L., Gasparotto, P., Csányi, G. & Michaelides, A. An accurate and transferable machine learning potential for carbon. J. Chem. Phys. 153, 034702 (2020).
Ouyang, W., Mandelli, D., Urbakh, M. & Hod, O. Nanoserpents: Graphene Nanoribbon Motion on Two-Dimensional Hexagonal Materials. Nano Lett. 18, 6009–6016 (2018).
Sheppard, D., Terrell, R. & Henkelman, G. Optimization methods for finding minimum energy paths. J. Chem. Phys. 128, 134106 (2008).
Kerelsky, A. et al. Maximized electron interactions at the magic angle in twisted bilayer graphene. Nature 572, 95–100 (2019).
Moon, P. & Koshino, M. Energy spectrum and quantum Hall effect in twisted bilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. B 85, 195458 (2012).
Kang, J. & Vafek, O. Symmetry, Maximally Localized Wannier States, and a Low-Energy Model for Twisted Bilayer Graphene Narrow Bands. Phys. Rev. X 8, 031088 (2018).
Acknowledgements
We gratefully acknowledge the grants that supported this research. TR, HTJ and EE acknowledge the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Computational Materials Sciences program under Award Number DE-SC0020177, which supported the scale-bridging electronic structure methods. TR and EE also acknowledge the funding support from the National Science Foundation (Award number: 1555278 and 1720633), which supported the analysis of mechanical deformation. This research used resources of the Oak Ridge Leadership Computing Facility, which is a DOE Office of Science User Facility supported under Contract DE-AC05-00OR22725. TR acknowledges the help from Dr. Naheed Ferdous to develop the tight-binding code. TR and PP acknowledges thoughtful discussion and data sharing from Professor Gilberto Medeiros Ribeiro and Dr. Douglas Ohlberg.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
T.R. developed the work-flow for the project, performed the simulations, investigated the results, and prepared the manuscript. Both T.R. and P.P. worked on data analysis. H.T.J. and E.E. administered the project and acquired the funds that supported the research. H.T.J., E.E. and P.P. supervised the project and reviewed the manuscripts. All authors contributed to this work.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Rakib, T., Pochet, P., Ertekin, E. et al. Corrugation-driven symmetry breaking in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene. Commun Phys 5, 242 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-022-01013-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-022-01013-y
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.