Abstract
Secondary phosphines are important building blocks in organic chemistry as their reactive P—H bond enables construction of more elaborate molecules. In particular, they can be used to construct tertiary phosphines that have widespread applications as organocatalysts, and as ligands in metal-complex catalysis. We report here a practical synthesis of the bulky secondary phosphine synthon 2,2,6,6-tetramethylphosphinane (TMPhos). Its nitrogen analogue tetramethylpiperidine, known for over a century, is used as a base in organic chemistry. We obtained TMPhos on a multigram scale from an inexpensive air-stable precursor, ammonium hypophosphite. TMPhos is also a close structural relative of di-tert-butylphosphine, a key component of many important catalysts. Herein we also describe the synthesis of key derivatives of TMPhos, with potential applications ranging from CO2 conversion to cross-coupling and beyond. The availability of a new core phosphine building block opens up a diverse array of opportunities in catalysis.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Over a century ago, the sterically hindered base 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine (TMP) was first isolated by Franchimont and Friedmann from aqueous ammonia and phorone1. TMP and its derivatives would turn out to have widespread use in organic chemistry including the oxidant and radical trap TEMPO2,3, the superbase LiTMP4, and hindered amine light stabilisers (HALS)5. Recently, it has been used as the base component of certain frustrated Lewis Pairs6. Yet surprisingly, the synthesis of the phosphorus congener, 2,2,6,6-tetramethylphosphinane (TMPhos, Fig. 1), has not been described until now.
a TMPhos (2,2,6,6-tetramethylphosphinane) as the P-analogue of TMP and structurally related to tBu2PH. b Well-known phosphine ligands containing -PtBu2.
Structurally related to TMPhos is di-tert-butylphosphine (tBu2PH), a bulky secondary phosphine synthon and an important component in many well-known ligands for homogeneous catalysis (Fig. 1). For example, the Alpha process for the commercial production of methyl methacrylate employs di-tert-butylphosphino-o-xylene palladium catalyst (Pd-DTBPX) in one of the key steps: methoxycarbonylation of ethylene to methylpropanoate7. JohnPhos from the Buchwald ligand family has multiple applications in Pd–catalysed cross-coupling reactions, such as Suzuki–Miyaura reactions between boronic acids and aryl halides8, amination of aryl halides and triflates9,10, as well as arylation of thiophenes11. Pincer ligands12 also have widespread applications in homogeneous catalysis and have undergone a renaissance in recent decades due to their ability to participate in metal-ligand cooperation13. In many examples the tBu2P motif is an important component of such pincer ligands14,15.
tBu2PH is a widely used building block in the design of many ligands. Yet its 5- and 6-membered heterocyclic secondary phosphine analogues, 2,2,5,5-tetramethylphospholane and TMPhos have not yet been isolated. Sulfide derivatives of the former were detected from the reaction between the corresponding di-Grignard and PhPCl2 (Fig. 2a), but the secondary phosphine has thus far remained elusive16. McNulty and Capretta obtained a series of substituted tertiary phosphinanes from the reaction between R-PH2 and phorone, followed by reduction of the ketone group, Fig. 2b17. They found that this family of ligands was tunable, cheap and efficient in cross-coupling reactions, like popular ligands such as tBu3P. The six-membered heterocycle 2,2,6,6-tetramethylphosphinan-4-one has been prepared by a lithium cleavage of the corresponding phenyl derivative, Fig. 2c. This bulky secondary phosphine is probably the closest known structure to TMPhos, however, the yield of the reaction was low (~10%) most likely due to competing lithium cleavage of the P-tert-alkyl bonds18. Van Meurs and co-workers have also recently demonstrated that the bulky 1,2-bis(2,2,6,6-tetramethylphosphorinan-4-one)xylene (BPX, Fig. 2d), is a more effective ligand in the isomerising carbonylation of alkenes, compared to its acyclic analogue19.
a Phospholane sulfide, b phosphinanes, c phosphorinones, d bis(phosphorinone)xylene, BPX.
Heterocyclic phosphines offer unique properties that can be tuned by ring size, substituents and functional groups20,21,22,23. In order to access more ligands incorporating bulky phosphinanes, we targeted the synthesis of the secondary phosphine synthon, TMPhos. Herein, we report the synthesis and isolation of TMPhos on a multigram scale starting from ammonium hypophosphite (NH4H2PO2), an abundant low-cost reducing agent used in metallurgy24. We demonstrate the facile use of TMPhos as a building block in the construction of various ligands and compare them to structurally similar commercial counterparts.
Results and discussion
Initial synthesis of TMPhos
2,2,6,6-Tetramethylpiperidine can be made via conjugate addition of ammonia and phorone to give 2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4-piperidinone, followed by a Wolff–Kishner reduction of the ketone4. Our approach was based on a similar strategy: a ring forming reaction between phorone and a suitable phosphorus precursor; followed by the subsequent reduction of the ketone group to furnish TMPhos. Phorone can be readily obtained by the aldol condensation of acetone25. However, Welcher and Day had attempted the Michael addition of phosphine (PH3) to phorone 60 years ago and reported that no reaction occurred26. Furthermore, phosphine gas is highly toxic, and pyrophoric, making further investigations into this reaction hazardous, in spite of recent progress being made in the development of procedures using in situ generated PH327.
Aiming to avoid handling PH3 gas we first attempted to obtain TMPhos via a Li–cleavage of 1-phenyl-2,2,6,6-tetramethylphosphinane in an adaptation of Pastor’s procedure18, see Fig. 3a. We first obtained phenyl phosphorinone (i) from the condensation of phorone and PhPH226, followed by Wolff–Kishner reduction to produce phenyl phosphinane (ii)17. Reductive cleavage of aryl-phosphorus bonds using alkali metals can be used to generate lithium phosphide species which upon hydrolysis will generate secondary phosphines28. The reaction between (ii) and Li at 5 °C furnished the desired secondary phosphine (iii) (31P δ = −9.1 ppm) but only as a minor product (~26% yield). The major product, 2,6-dimethylheptan-2-yl(phenyl)phosphine, has a slightly upfield 31P chemical shift of −11.0 ppm. This product arises from a competing ring opening reaction, as Li preferentially cleaves phosphorus bonded to the tertiary carbon atom28. The ring-opened compound undergoes a second cleavage to generate PhPH2 as well as 2,6-dimethylheptane. Despite being only a minor product, the desired secondary phosphine, TMPhos, could be isolated as the borane adduct by first performing vacuum distillation to separate it from the high boiling phosphines, followed by addition of borane dimethylsulfide complex to generate TMPhos·BH3, (iv).
a Synthesis of TMPhos via Li cleavage of 1-phenyl-2,2,6,6-tetramethylphosphinane. b Attempted synthesis of (v).
Improved synthesis of TMPhos
Since the atom economy and reaction yield from the Li cleavage of (ii) were both poor, this route was not attractive for obtaining sufficient amounts of TMPhos to explore its downstream chemistry. Therefore, we continued to investigate alternative routes for the synthesis of TMPhos. There are a number of primary phosphine surrogates that mimic the reactivity of PH3, such as methyl hypophosphite (H2PO2Me) and bis(trimethylsilyl)phosphonite ((Me3SiO)2PH) that can both be derived from commercially available and relatively benign hypophosphorous acid. By this route, we obtained H2PO2Me from the alkylation of hypophosphorous acid with trimethyl orthoformate29. However, in the presence of NEt3 we observed no reaction between phorone and H2PO2Me, but instead a base-catalysed disproportionation to hypophosphorous acid and dimethoxyphosphine occurred, see Fig. 3b.
We therefore turned our attention to the more reactive (Me3SiO)2PH, which had been shown to undergo Michael additions to conjugated alkenes30,31,32, and nucleophilic substitutions with alkyl halides33 to furnish mono- or di-substituted phosphinic acids and even heterocycles. As (Me3SiO)2PH is pyrophoric it is typically generated in situ. We generated (Me3SiO)2PH either by the reaction between NH4H2PO2 and hexamethyldisilazane (HMDS)31 or with NH4H2PO2 and trimethylsilyl chloride (TMSCl) in the presence of Hünig’s base (Fig. 4)30. The formation of (Me3SiO)2PH is evidenced by a doublet in the 31P NMR spectrum (δ = 141.7 ppm, 1JHP = 175.4 Hz). In both cases the (Me3SiO)2PH generated in situ reacted readily at RT with phorone producing intermediate 1. In this intermediate, one of the TMS groups has migrated to form a silyl enol ether. This was reflected by two inequivalent TMS groups in 29Si{1H} NMR, of which only one is coupled to 31P (d, 11.0 Hz) while the other remains a singlet, and was further confirmed by 1H-29Si 2D HMBC. The Z-isomer was determined to be the major product from 2D NOESY experiment, in which a distinctive NOE was observed between one terminal methyl group and the (distal) alkene proton of the enol ether (Supplementary Fig. 39 and Supplementary Data 1). In the 1H NMR spectrum the PH appears as a doublet at 6.96 ppm, with a large coupling constant (1JHP = 544.2 Hz), consistent with that of a hypophosphite34.
a Hünig’s Base/TMSCl/NH4H2PO2, b HMDS/NH4H2PO2, c 125 °C, 72 h, d microwave heating at 220 °C, 90 min.
The enolisation of the ketone group prevents a second Michael addition and ring closure from occurring due to the disruption of the conjugation. It could, however, be easily deprotected using 2 M aq. HCl to furnish enone-phosphinic acid 2 (31P δ = 46.1 ppm) in 93% yield on a multigram scale (>40 g). SC-XRD of compound 2 confirmed the expected structure (see Fig. 4 and Supplementary Fig. 3). We achieved the ring closure of 2 by addition of HMDS while monitoring the reaction by 31P NMR spectroscopy. Upon addition of HMDS to 2 the silyl ester 3 forms immediately, and upon heating this gradually forms the cyclised silyl intermediate 4.
The ring closure (6-endo-trig) is sluggish likely due to the steric constraints. Initially attempts at ring closure in 1,2-dichloroethane (DCE) at 70 °C required two weeks to approach full conversion. Later we changed the solvent to xylenes, which allowed for a reaction temperature of 125 °C and enabled good conversion (>80%) in 3 days. Alternatively, full conversion can be obtained in just 90 min using a microwave reactor at 220 °C, with a comparable isolated yield of 40%. The reaction was typically carried out at a concentration of ~0.2 M of phosphinic acid in xylenes) in order to minimise potential intermolecular side reactions; at higher concentration (0.6 M) a polymeric precipitate was observed. We also found that intermediate 3 can be formed via a partial hydrolysis of intermediate 1, since the silyl enol ether will preferentially hydrolyse in the presence of one equivalent of protic solvent such as ethanol. This enables a one-pot synthesis of 2,2,6,6-tetramethylphosphorinic acid, 5, however, we found that less side-products were obtained if the phosphinic acid 2 was first isolated and purified. After acid hydrolysis of intermediate 4, bifunctional bulky heterocyclic 5 was isolated in 58% yield from 2 at >10 g scale. Single crystals of 5 were grown by evaporation of a solution of the compound in acetone and a representation of the molecular structure is shown in Fig. 4 and Supplementary Fig. 4.
The conversion of 5 to TMPhos involves the reduction of both the ketone and phosphinic acid functional groups. We first reduced the ketone group using a standard Wolff–Kishner procedure to give 2,2,6,6-tetramethylphosphaninic acid, 6, in good yield (77%). Direct reduction of phosphinic acids to phosphine has been reported using Ph2SiH235 or PhSiH330. However, these approaches gave low or no yield of the desired secondary phosphine when applied to compound 6, presumably due to either the increased steric bulk or the more basic P character (as compared to aromatic P compounds). Conversion to TMPhos was instead achieved via reduction of the corresponding phosphinic chloride 7, obtained by chlorination using (COCl)2 in the presence of catalytic DMF. After LiAlH4 reduction, TMPhos, 8, was obtained by distillation in moderate yield (53%). We have performed all synthetic steps to TMPhos on at least 5 g scale (reactant) with some on significantly larger scales. For safety reasons, at lab scale some steps were difficult to scale beyond certain thresholds (e.g. Wolff–Kishner reduction and LiAlH4 reduction) and we are working on the process development of these steps.
Properties and reactivity of TMPhos
TMPhos is a colourless liquid with a 31P chemical shift of −9.1 ppm (1JPH = 200.0 Hz), significantly upfield of tBu2PH (δ = 20.6 ppm, 1JPH = 193.0 Hz). Six-membered phosphinanes typically adopt ring shapes typical of cyclohexanes, with chair confirmations normally observed in solid state structures (vide infra)22. Compared to tBu2PH, TMPhos is notably more resistant to oxidation. When a solution of TMPhos in CDCl3 was exposed to air, remarkably no oxidation was detected in the first 24 h. The slower oxidation of TMPhos was gratifying since air oxidation is a categorical weakness of alkyl phosphines and may arise from a less basic P in TMPhos compared with tBu2PH (vide infra). Even after exposure to air for 5 days only 20% of TMPhos had oxidised to the phosphine oxide 9 as the sole product (which could also be generated cleanly using m-CPBA, Fig. 5). In contrast, 80% of tBu2PH had decomposed to a mixture of products resulting from oxygen insertion into a P-tBu bond36 forming t-butylphosphinate which hydrolyses to t-butylphosphinic acid (Supplementary Figs. 1 and 2). The heterocyclic conformation of TMPhos presumably prevents oxygen insertion from occurring which is a clear demonstration of its unique properties.
Conversion of TMPhos to the corresponding oxide (9), borane adduct (10), chlorophosphine (11), selenide (12) and rhodium (13), and palladium complexes (14, 15).
To demonstrate the versatility of TMPhos as a building block in organic synthesis, several TMPhos derivatives 10 and 11 were also synthesised (Fig. 5). For benchtop use, air-stable tetramethylphosphinane borane complex TMPhos·BH3 (compound 10) was obtained by stirring equimolar amounts of TMPhos with BH3·SMe2. Dialkylchlorophosphines are also synthetically versatile synthons, and chlorination of TMPhos with one equivalent of methyl trichloroacetate affords the chlorophosphine 11 in high yield (72%).
We synthesised the phosphorus selenide 12 since 1JPSe coupling constants can give an indication of the basicity of phosphines37. The 1JPSe of compound 12 (717.2 Hz) is larger than reported for the corresponding tBu2P(H) = Se (704 Hz) which suggests TMPhos is less basic38. This was supported by a ν(C ≡ O) of 1971.0 cm−1 for [(TMPhos)Rh(CO)(acac)] 13 compared to 1963.4 cm−1 for [(tBu2PH)Rh(CO)(acac)] (see Supplementary Methods). This is consistent with observations for similar compounds where it was postulated that a smaller C-P-C angle resulting from the ring conformation contributes to a less basic P19.
In comparison with tertiary phosphines, palladium complexes bearing secondary phosphines are relatively uncommon owing to their reactive P–H bond. Homoleptic complexes of secondary phosphines are rare, with [(tBu2PH)3Pd(0)] and [(Ph2PH)4Pd(0)] being the only reported examples for palladium39,40. We were therefore interested to obtain a homoleptic complex of Pd bearing TMPhos ligands. [(TMPhos)3Pd(0)] 14 was synthesised following the same procedure reported for [(tBu2PH)3Pd(0)]39. The addition of excess TMPhos and allyl(cyclopentadienyl)palladium(II) was accompanied by the reductive elimination of 5-allyl-1,3-cyclopentadiene to give 14 as a yellow solid in 67% yield. In solution, 14 gave a broad doublet at 42.1 ppm (1JPH = 246 Hz) in its 31P NMR spectrum, upfield of the corresponding tBu2PH complex (δ = 54.5 ppm, 1JPH = 256 Hz). In solution Leoni found evidence of a rapid equilibrium between [(tBu2PH)3Pd] and [(tBu2PH)2Pd]39. The latter thermally transforms to dimeric [Pd(μ-PtBu2)(HPtBu2)]2 with the concomitant loss of H2. We found that complex 14 underwent a similar transformation. A solution of 14 kept at RT formed red single crystals of bimetallic complex 15, its identity being confirmed by SC-XRD (Fig. 6 and Supplementary Fig. 5). The structure contains two bridging TMPhos ligands and two terminally bound TMPhos ligands with H atoms in the axial position. The Pd1-Pd1i bond length of 2.61(1) Å is statistically comparable with corresponding [Pd(μ-PtBu2)(HPtBu2)]2 complex where it was 2.60(1) Å41. Likewise the Pd-P1 and Pd-P2 bond lengths of 2.27(1) and 2.31(1) Å, respectively, were also comparable to the tBu2PH complex, where they were 2.29(1) and 2.34(1) Å. The most noticeable difference is the anticipated C-P-C bond angle contraction in the phosphinane rings. In the case of terminal phosphinane the C1-P1-C5 angle was 105.3(1)° whereas the bridging phosphinane had an even smaller C10-Pd-C14 angle of 104.6(1)°. These angles are noticeably smaller than the corresponding angles in the tBu2PH complex which were 112.0(3)° and 111.3(3)°, respectively. These differences are reflected in a smaller cone angle calculated for the terminal TMPhos-Pd (126°) compared with tBu2PH-Pd (134°), see Supplementary Methods Section 5.
Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (°): Pd1-Pd1i 2.6053(3), Pd1-P1 2.2686(3) Pd1-P2 2.3124(3), Pd1-P2i 2.3426(3), P1-Pd1-P2 131.267(9), P1-Pd1-P2i 116.715(9), P2-Pd1-P2i 112.017(7), Pd1-P2-Pd1i 67.982(7), P1-Pd1-Pd1i 172.166(8), P2-Pd1-Pd1i 56.562(7), P2i-Pd1-Pd1i 55.455(7), C1-P1-C5 105.34(5), and C10-P2-C14 104.64(4).
Using TMPhos we were also able to readily construct a variety of pro-ligands based on well-known phosphines as shown in Fig. 7. Simple alkyl phosphinanes, such as those shown in Fig. 2b, have been demonstrated to be effective ligands in palladium catalysed cross-coupling reactions17, and JohnPhos is commercialised for the same purpose42. We therefore synthesised the monophosphine TMPhos(Biphenyl), 16 which is a combination of a phosphinane ring and a classic Buchwald biphenyl substituent. To showcase TMPhos-based bidentate ligands, we first prepared the simple bis-phosphines BTMPPr 17 and BTMPBu 18 with propyl and butyl backbones respectively. The tBu2P versions of these ligands have been applied in carbonylation of alkenes43 and polymerisation of phenylacetylene44. Next we constructed a bis-phosphine bearing the well-known xanthene backbone TMPhos(Xantphos) 19 as Xantphos has many applications in coordination chemistry and catalysis45. For example, tBu-Xantphos has been shown to stabilise NiI alkyl complexes that rapidly insert CO2 to form the corresponding Ni-carboxylate species46. We also made bis(tetramethylphosphinane)xylene (BTMPX) 20 and its SC-XRD data is shown in Supplementary Fig. 6. This bis(phosphine) is analogous to DTBPX, a ligand used industrially and recently reviewed47. Finally we synthesised the pincer ligands TMPhos(PCP) and TMPhos(PNP), (21 and 22), as pincer ligands are now well established in homogenous catalysis with an abundance of applications48,49. The above examples were chosen as their tBu2P analogues are well known, in many cases affording highly active catalysts in a variety of different reactions. In all cases the TMPhos derivatives possess significantly upfield 31P chemical shifts: between 16 to 24 ppm more negative than their tBu2P counterparts. This is likely a consequence of the γ-substituent effects imposed by the ring, rather than a simple reflection of the electron-donating power of the phosphine50.
Ligands incorporating TMPhos (16–22) and associated metal complexes (23–25) with potential catalytic applications (in green).
We went on to explore the coordination chemistry of selected pro-ligands, targeting variations of well-known pre-catalysts. The first example, [(BTMPX)Pd(O2CCF3)2] 23 was synthesised from [(BTMPX)PdCl2] (S3, Supplementary Methods and Supplementary Fig. 7) and investigated due to its similarity to the commercially relevant Mitsubishi–Lucite catalyst. Its molecular structure is shown in Fig. 8 and Supplementary Fig. 8, together with selected key bond lengths and angles in Table 1. The complex adopts a four-coordinate square planar geometry. The P-Pd-P angle of 101.9(1)° is slightly larger than for similar complexes like [(DTBPX)Pd(O3SMe)2]51 and [(BPX)Pd(O2CCF3)2]19, where the bite angles are 100.6(1)° and 100.1(1)°, respectively. As seen in complex 15, smaller C-P-C angles were observed in the phosphinane ring. The C(tBu)-P-C(tBu) angle in the DTBPX analogues is about ~110°52, whereas for 23 the bond angles for C18-P1-C22 and C9-P2-C13 are 105.8(1)° and 106.8(1)° respectively. Taken together, it follows that complex 23 has a marginally smaller buried volume (%VBur = 50.0%) compared to that calculated for structurally related [(DTBPX)Pd(O3SMe)2] (%VBur = 53.1%), see Supplementary Figs. 11 and 14 for topographic steric maps51,53.
ORTEP representations for the crystal structures of [(BTMPX)Pd(O2CCF3)2] 23 and [TMPhos(PNP)Ru(CO)(Cl)H] 24, drawn at 50% probability. The fluorine atoms of the CF3 groups exhibit rotational disorder in the crystal structure.
We also prepared the ruthenium hydride complex [TMPhos(PNP)Ru(CO)(Cl)H] 24. The tBu2P variant of this complex is an effective catalyst for the reversible hydrogenation of CO2 to formates, giving a TOF in excess of 1 million54. In our complex, the hydride signal appears as a triplet at −15.05 ppm (2JHP = 19.2 Hz) in the 1H NMR spectrum, very similar to the hydride signal in the corresponding tBu2P complex (−15.22 ppm, 2JHP = 19.4 Hz). Single crystals were obtained from the vapour diffusion of pentane into a saturated solution of the complex in CH2Cl2. The crystal structure contained two crystallographically independent complexes per unit cell (Fig. 8 and Supplementary Figs. 9-10). In one molecule there is one phosphorus above and below the plane of the pyridine ring, by 0.77 Å and 0.57 Å respectively. By contrast in the second molecule both P atoms lie on the same side of the pyridine ring by 0.55 Å and 0.91 Å respectively. The P-Ru-P angles of 159.9(1)° and 159.7(1)° are slightly larger than that for the corresponding tBu2P complex at 158.4(1)°55, whereas the N-Ru-CO angles of 175.5(1)° and 173.2(1)° are quite compressed as compared to an angle of 178.5(1)° in the tBu2P version. Complex 24 has a slightly smaller %VBur of 51.9% compared to 53.3% for the analogous tBu2P complex55, see Supplementary Figs. 12, 13, and 15.
Finally, we prepared the TMPhos analogue of the classic Shaw Ir-tBuPCP pincer complex, [TMPhos(PCP)Ir(H)Cl], complex 25. The TMPhos variant, 25, possesses a broad hydride resonance in its 1H NMR spectrum (−40.44 ppm) which is downfield compared to the tBu2P complex (−43.37 ppm in CD2Cl2). This suggests a decreased electron density at the metal centre when TMPhos is used. Nearly half a century ago, Shaw’s seminal work on PCP pincers recognised the special properties conferred by bulky tertiary phosphine ligands56. These include the ability to promote hydride formation and metalation reactions, as well as the stabilisation of coordinative unsaturation56, anticipating the huge contribution bulky pincer ligands have subsequently made in catalysis. We therefore expect TMPhos ligands to also have useful catalytic applications and work is ongoing to investigate the use of 16–25 in this regard.
Conclusion
We have developed a multigram synthetic route to a bulky secondary heterocyclic phosphine synthon, TMPhos, starting from an inexpensive and air-stable phosphine precursor. Remarkably, this phosphorus heterocycle has been only described now, almost 120 years after its congener, the widely-used TMP. We have successfully demonstrated its use as a synthon by constructing a variety of tertiary phosphine ligands as well as several metal complexes incorporating the TMPhos substituent. We believe that TMPhos could find similar applications as the important acyclic di-tert-butylphosphine substituent in ligand design and catalysis as it offers a different steric environment, restricted rotation, and different electronic properties to previously known phosphine ligands.
Methods
Synthetic procedures
See Supplementary Information Section 1.
Phosphine oxidation tests
NMR spectra
See Supplementary Figs. 17–123 in Supplementary Data 1.
Single crystal X-ray diffraction data
See Supplementary Figs. 3–10 and Supplementary Tables 1–14.
Buried volume calculations
See Supplementary Figs. 11–15.
Calculation of Tolman cone angles
Data availability
The authors declare that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and Supplementary Information. For experimental details and compound characterisation data, see Supplementary Information. For NMR spectra, see Supplementary Data 1. The X-ray crystallographic data for compounds can be found in Supplementary Data 2–8 or obtained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre with the accession codes CDCC #2182394 (2), #2182395 (5), #2182396 (15), #2182397 (20), #2182398 (23), #2182399 (24) and #2182393 (S3) via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif.
References
Franchimont, A. P. N. & Friedmann, H. Sur l’-α,α′-tétraméthylpipéridine et quelques dérivés. Recl. Trav. Chim. Pays-Bas 24, 404–418 (1905).
Lebedev, O. L. & Kazarnovskii, S. N. Intermediate products of oxidation of amines by pertungstate. Tr. Khim. Khim. Tekhnol. 2, 649–656 (1959).
Vogler, T. & Studer, A. Applications of TEMPO in synthesis. Synthesis 2008, 1979–1993 (2008).
Kampmann, D. et al. A large-scale low-cost access to the lithium 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidide precursor. Synthesis 2005, 1028–1029 (2005).
Gijsman, P. A review on the mechanism of action and applicability of hindered amine stabilizers. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 145, 2–10 (2017).
Herrington, T. J., Thom, A. J. W., White, A. J. P. & Ashley, A. E. Novel H2 activation by a tris[3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]borane frustrated Lewis pair. Dalton Trans. 41, 9019–9022 (2012).
Pearson, J. M. & Haddon, R. A. Process for the palladium and phosphine ligand catalyzed carbonylation of ethylene. Lucite International UK Ltd., US 2001051745 A1 (2001).
Wolfe, J. P., Singer, R. A., Yang, B. H. & Buchwald, S. L. Highly active palladium catalysts for Suzuki coupling reactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 121, 9550–9561 (1999).
Surry, D. S. & Buchwald, S. L. Biaryl phosphane ligands in palladium-catalyzed amination. Angew. Chem. 47, 6338–6361 (2008).
Wolfe, J. P., Tomori, H., Sadighi, J. P., Yin, J. & Buchwald, S. L. Simple, efficient catalyst system for the palladium-catalyzed amination of aryl chlorides, bromides, and triflates. J. Org. Chem. 65, 1158–1174 (2000).
Okazawa, T., Satoh, T., Miura, M. & Nomura, M. Palladium-catalyzed multiple arylation of thiophenes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124, 5286–5287 (2002).
Lawrence, M. A. W., Green, K.-A., Nelson, P. N. & Lorraine, S. C. Review: Pincer ligands—tunable, versatile and applicable. Polyhedron 143, 11–27 (2018).
Khusnutdinova, J. R. & Milstein, D. Metal–ligand cooperation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54, 12236–12273 (2015).
Schmeier, T. J., Hazari, N., Incarvito, C. D. & Raskatov, J. A. Exploring the reactions of CO2 with PCP supported nickel complexes. Chem. Commun. 47, 1824–1826 (2011).
Goldman, A. S. et al. Catalytic alkane metathesis by tandem alkane dehydrogenation-olefin metathesis. Science 312, 257–261 (2006).
Fischer, R., Görls, H. & Westerhausen, M. Reactivity studies of [(THF)2Mg{μ-C(CH3)2C2H4C(CH3)2}]2: scrambling reactions and diverse reactions with dichlorophenylphosphane. Organometallics 35, 3861–3869 (2016).
Brenstrum, T. et al. Phosphorinanes as ligands for palladium-catalyzed cross-coupling chemistry. Org. Lett. 8, 103–105 (2006).
Pastor, S. D., Odorisio, P. A. & Spivack, J. D. 2,2,6,6-Tetramethyl-4-phosphorinanol: synthesis and conformational analysis. J. Org. Chem. 49, 2906–2909 (1984).
Nobbs, J. D. et al. Isomerizing methoxycarbonylation of alkenes to esters using a bis(phosphorinone)xylene palladium catalyst. Organometallics 36, 391–398 (2017).
Marinetti, A. & Carmichael, D. Synthesis and properties of phosphetanes. Chem. Rev. 102, 201–230 (2002).
Gallagher, M. J. in Phosphorus-Carbon Heterocyclic Chemistry (ed. Mathey, F.) 463–483 (Elsevier Science Ltd, 2001).
Quin, L. D. & Hughes A. N. in Organophosphorus Compounds (1990) (ed. Hartley, F. R.) 295–384 (Wiley, 2010).
Tay, D. W. P., Nobbs, J. D., Aitipamula, S., Britovsek, G. J. P. & van Meurs, M. Directing selectivity to aldehydes, alcohols, or esters with diphobane ligands in Pd-catalyzed alkene carbonylations. Organometallics 40, 1914–1925 (2021).
Guyon, C., Métay, E., Popowycz, F. & Lemaire, M. Synthetic applications of hypophosphite derivatives in reduction. Org. Biomol. Chem. 13, 7879–7906 (2015).
Craven, E. C. & Ward, W. R. Phorone and isomeric forms. J. Appl. Chem. 10, 18–23 (1960).
Welcher, R. P. & Day, N. E. 4-Phosphorinanones. II. J. Org. Chem. 27, 1824–1827 (1962).
Barber, T. & Ball, L. T. Synthesis of tert-Alkyl phosphines: preparation of di-(1-adamantyl)phosphonium trifluoromethanesulfonate and tri-(1-adamantyl)phosphine. Org. Syntheses 98, 289–314 (2021).
Budzelaar, P. H. M., van Doorn, J. A. & Meijboom, N. Reductive cleavage of the carbon-phosphorus bond with alkali metals. I. Cleavage of functionalised triphenylphosphines; formation of secondary and primary phosphines. Recl. Trav. Chim. Pays-Bas 110, 420–432 (1991).
Cristau, H.-J., Coulombeau, A., Genevois-Borella, A., Sanchez, F. & Pirat, J.-L. Preparation of phosphinodipeptide analogs as building blocks for pseudopeptides synthesis. J. Organomet. Chem. 643–644, 381–391 (2002).
Soulier, E., Yaouanc, J.-J., Laurent, P., Abbayes, H. & Clément, J.-C. Phosphane and bis(phosphane) ligands from phosphinic acids. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 3497–3503 (2000).
Boyd, E. A., Regan, A. C. & James, K. Synthesis of γ-keto-substituted phosphinic acids from bis(trimethylsilyl)phosphonite and α,β-unsaturated ketones. Tetrahedron Lett. 33, 813–816 (1992).
Tatarinov, D. A., Kundina, M. V., Dobrynin, A. B. & Mironov, V. F. Reactions of unsaturated ketones with bis(trimethylsilyl) hypophosphite. Russ. J. Gen. Chem. 88, 90–95 (2018).
Boyd, E. A., Regan, A. C. & James, K. Synthesis of alkyl phosphinic acids from silyl phosphonites and alkyl halides. Tetrahedron Lett. 35, 4223–4226 (1994).
Schwabacher, A. W. & Stefanescu, A. D. Improved preparation of phosphinate esters for palladium-catalyzed cross-coupling. Tetrahedron Lett. 37, 425–428 (1996).
Lambert, J. B. & Oliver, W. L. Conformational analysis of phosphacyclohexanes. Tetrahedron 27, 4245–4254 (1971).
Buckler, S. A. Autoxidation of trialkylphosphines. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 84, 3093–3097 (1962).
Beckmann, U., Süslüyan, D. & Kunz, P. C. Is the 1 J PSe coupling constant a reliable probe for the basicity of phosphines? A 31P NMR study. Phosphorus Sulfur Silicon Relat. Elem. 186, 2061–2070 (2011).
Lindner, E. et al. Preparation, properties, and reactions of metal-containing heterocycles, XCV. Transition-metal-mediated cyclocotrimerization of selenophosphinites with activated alkynes. Chem. Ber. 129, 945–951 (1996).
Leoni, P. The first palladium(0) complex with only secondary phosphines as ligands and its oxidative-addition reactions with dichloromethane and chloroform, giving the thermally stable derivatives trans-[PdCl(R)(PBut2H)2] (R = CH2Cl, CHCl2). Organometallics 12, 2432–2434 (1993).
Giannandrea, R., Mastrorilli, P. & Nobile, C. F. Synthesis of diphenylphosphine palladium complexes. Inorg. Chim. Acta 284, 116–118 (1999).
Leoni, P., Sommovigo, M., Pasquali, M., Sabatino, P. & Braga, D. A simple synthesis and crystal structure of the dinuclear diphosphido-bridged palladium(I) complex [Pd(PtBu2H)(μ-PtBu2)]2. J. Organomet. Chem. 423, 263–270 (1992).
Martin, R. & Buchwald, S. L. Palladium-catalyzed suzuki−miyaura cross-coupling reactions employing dialkylbiaryl phosphine ligands. Acc. Chem. Res. 41, 1461–1473 (2008).
Low, C. H. et al. Palladium complexes with bulky diphosphine ligands as highly selective catalysts for the synthesis of (bio-) adipic acid from pentenoic acid mixtures. Organometallics 34, 4281–4292 (2015).
Huber, J. & Mecking, S. Aqueous poly(arylacetylene) dispersions. Macromolecules 43, 8718–8723 (2010).
van Leeuwen, P. W. N. M. & Kamer, P. C. J. Featuring Xantphos. Catal. Sci. Technol. 8, 26–113 (2018).
Diccianni, J. B., Hu, C. T. & Diao, T. Insertion of CO2 mediated by a (Xantphos)NiI–alkyl species. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58, 13865–13868 (2019).
Vondran, J., Furst, M. R. L., Eastham, G. R., Seidensticker, T. & Cole-Hamilton, D. J. Magic of alpha: the chemistry of a remarkable bidentate phosphine, 1,2-bis(di-tert-butylphosphinomethyl)benzene. Chem. Rev. 121, 6610–6653 (2021).
Deolka, S., Fayzullin, R. R. & Khaskin, E. Bulky PNP ligands blocking metal-ligand cooperation allow for isolation of Ru(0), and lead to catalytically active Ru complexes in acceptorless alcohol dehydrogenation. Chem. Eur. J. 28, e202103778 (2022).
Tang, S. et al. Pyridine-based PCP-ruthenium complexes: unusual structures and metal-ligand cooperation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 7554–7561 (2019).
Klein, H.-F. Practical interpretation of P-31 NMR spectra and computer assisted structure verification. Von Louis D. Quin und Antony J. Williams. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 44, 7331–7331 (2005).
Clegg, W. et al. Synthesis and reactivity of palladium hydrido-solvento complexes, including a key intermediate in the catalytic methoxycarbonylation of ethene to methyl propanoate. J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. 2002, 3300–3308 (2002).
Clegg, W. et al. Characterization and dynamics of [Pd(L–L)H(solv)]+, [Pd(L–L)(CH2CH3)]+, and [Pd(L–L)(C(O)Et)(THF)]+ (L–L = 1,2-(CH2PBut2)2C6H4): key intermediates in the catalytic methoxycarbonylation of ethene to methylpropanoate. Organometallics 21, 1832–1840 (2002).
Falivene, L. et al. SambVca 2. a web tool for analyzing catalytic pockets with topographic steric maps. Organometallics 35, 2286–2293 (2016).
Filonenko, G. A., van Putten, R., Schulpen, E. N., Hensen, E. J. M. & Pidko, E. A. Highly efficient reversible hydrogenation of carbon dioxide to formates using a ruthenium PNP-pincer catalyst. ChemCatChem 6, 1526–1530 (2014).
Eizawa, A., Nishimura, S., Arashiba, K., Nakajima, K. & Nishibayashi, Y. Synthesis of ruthenium complexes bearing PCP-type pincer ligands and their application to direct synthesis of imines from amines and benzyl alcohol. Organometallics 37, 3086–3092 (2018).
Moulton, C. J. & Shaw, B. L. Transition metal–carbon bonds. Part XLII. Complexes of nickel, palladium, platinum, rhodium and iridium with the tridentate ligand 2,6-bis[(di-t-butylphosphino)methyl]phenyl. J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. 1976, 1020–1024 (1976).
Meurs, M. V., Nobbs, J. D. & Sugiarto, S. Phosphorus compounds and methods thereof, A*STAR. WO 2022132048 Al (2022).
Acknowledgements
We gratefully acknowledge the Agency for Science, Technology & Research (A*STAR) for funding this work (CDF Grant C210812026). We would like to thank Yoon Hui Yeap and Christoper Ivan Wijaya Ong for assisting with the synthesis of selected compounds. We would also like to thank Angeline Seo, Haiyu Li and Anueshree Rajendran for performing the elemental analyses.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
J.D.N. is the lead author of manuscript and carried out and directed experiments. S.S. synthesised majority of compounds in the manuscript and was first to isolate TMPhos. X.Y.S. pioneered early work, isolating a key intermediate and revised manuscript. C.B.C. performed structural elucidation, spectral assignments and revised manuscript. S.A. carried out single-crystal X-ray crystallography for this work and revised manuscript. L.P.S. and M.v.M. provided ideas, directed work and revised manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare the following competing interest: some of the authors are inventors on a patent application that has recently been published57. All other authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Communications Chemistry thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Nobbs, J.D., Sugiarto, S., See, X.Y. et al. Tetramethylphosphinane as a new secondary phosphine synthon. Commun Chem 6, 85 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42004-023-00876-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42004-023-00876-8
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.
