Introduction

Organonitrile compounds are important to synthesis in medicinal, biological, and materials chemistry1,2,3,4,5 because of the very unique reactivity and activating ability of the nitrile group6,7,8. There are several methods for the synthesis of nitrile derivatives9,10,11,12,13, which are mainly based on the transition-metal-catalyzed reaction of aryl/alkyl halides or alcohols14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21. In addition, amide dehydration is an important method for the construction of the nitrile moiety22,23,24. Previously, the dehydration of a primary amide was conducted using harsh and acidic dehydrating reagents such as POCl322, P4O1023, and SOCl224 (Fig. 1a). Recently, there has been significant interest in the dehydration of amides25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33 catalyzed by transition metals such as Pd26,27,28,29, Re30, Fe32, In31 and Cu33 (Fig. 1b). On the other hand, the hydrolysis of alkyl halides to generate the corresponding alcohols is a textbook reaction34,35,36. Hydroxyl and nitrile groups are important because both of these functionalities can be found in several biologically active molecules and naturally occurring substrates5,37,38,39,40,41.

Fig. 1: Representative examples of nitrile derivative synthesis from amides.
figure 1

a Dehydration of primary amide using dehydrating agents. b Transition metal-catalyzed dehydration of amide. c Oxygen transfer reaction (this study).

A domino conversion of amide to nitrile and alkyl halide to the corresponding alcohol would be a very straightforward strategy for the construction of hydroxyalkyl nitriles (Fig. 1c). Herein, we report oxygen transfer reaction of haloalkyl amides affording hydroxyalkyl nitriles using a metal-free catalyst, phenylboronic acid, which can be reused without loss of catalytic activity.

Results and discussion

Reaction discovery

We previously reported the formation of lactams, phenanthridinone (3) by intramolecular amidation of aryl halides and amides using a polymeric nickel catalyst and phenylboronic acid (Fig. 2a)42. However, the reaction of 6-bromohexanamide (4a) surprisingly produced 6-hydroxyhexanenitrile (5a) in 80% yield instead of lactam 6 (Fig. 2b). Eventually, phenylboronic acid (2a) became the catalyst43,44,45,46,47,48,49 in this transformation, and the oxygen transfer reaction of 4a with 20 mol% of 2a and 3 molar equiv of potassium phosphate gave 5a in 80% yield (Fig. 2c and Table 1, entry 1).

Fig. 2: Serendipitous reaction discovery.
figure 2

a Our previous report of nickel-catalyzed lactamization. b Discovery of oxygen transfer reaction. c Phenylboronic acid-catalyzed oxygen transfer reaction.

Table 1 Deviation from standard reaction conditionsa.

The effects of deviation from the standard reaction conditions are shown in Tables 1 and S1 (Supporting Information). The use of 20 mol% of 2-phenyl-1,3,2-dioxaborinane (7) as the catalyst gave 72% of 5a (entry 2), which was similar as the yield of the reference reaction (80%, entry 1). The reaction afforded 60% of 5a when the amount of 2a was reduced from 20 to 10 mol% (entry 3). In the absence of 2a, no reaction occurred, confirming that this compound is the catalyst in this transformation (entry 4). The reaction in toluene as the solvent afforded 5a in 72% yield (entry 5). When a stronger base, potassium tert-butoxide (KOtBu), was used, the desired product 5a was not obtained (entry 6), and the simple β-elimination of the terminal alkyl bromide moiety occurred instead (see Supporting Information for more details).

Substrate scope

With the optimized reaction conditions in hand, we examined the substrate scope of this reaction (Fig. 3). The reaction of 4a produced 5a in 80% yield. The reactions of 6-chlorohexanamide (4a’) and 6-iodohexanamide (4a”) also afforded 5a in 47 and 74% yield, respectively. The reaction of 7-bromoheptanamide furnished 7-hydroxyheptanenitrile (5b) in 39% yield. The conversion of 5-bromopentanamide (4c) afforded 5-hydroxypentanenitrile (5c) in higher yield (86%). The reaction of the oxygen-tethered 2-(2-bromoethoxy)acetamide (4d) afforded 5d in 75% yield. Similarly, 4-bromobutanamide (4e) provided 5e in 60% yield. Unfortunately, the reaction of 3-bromopropanamide (4f) did not proceed. Here acrylamide was observed as the major product (see Supporting Information for more details). The reaction of a secondary alkyl bromide, 5-bromohexanamide (4g), showed the best result, providing 5g in 91% yield. Moreover, a secondary alkyl chloride, 5-chlorohexanamide (4g’), was also converted to 5g in 82% yield. The reaction of the cyclic compound, 2-(bromomethyl)cyclohexane-1-carboxamide (4h), proceeded to afford 5h in 63% yield. The yield of 5h was determined after tosylation (see Supporting Information for more details). The reaction of an aromatic amide (4i) was unsuccessful where lactam was obtained as a major product.

Fig. 3: Substrate scope of amide dehydration and alkyl halide hydrolysis.
figure 3

Reaction conditions: 4 (1 mol equiv), 2a (20 mol%), and K3PO4 (3 mol equiv) at 115 °C for 72 h. aisolated yield. byield was determined after tosylation.

Catalyst reusability

The reusability of the catalyst was then investigated (Fig. 4a, b). After the reaction, the catalyst was recovered as a cyclic trimer (phenylboroxine, 8) in 86% yield through column chromatographic separation (Fig. 4a). When the recovered 8 was used as the catalyst, the reaction proceeded efficiently to provide 81% yield of 5a (Fig. 4b).

Fig. 4: Catalyst reusability and control experiments.
figure 4

a Catalyst recovery. b Reusability of recovered catalyst 8. c Dehydration of amide without halogen tethering. d Hydrolysis of secondary amide under standard reaction conditions. e Intermolecular competition with/without halogen tethering. f Intermolecular competition between primary and secondary amide. g The effect of molecular sieves. h the effect of water. i The effect of 18O-water. j The effect of 20 mol% of Ph-B(18OH)2. k the effect of 1.5 molar equiv of Ph-B(18OH)2.

Control experiments

The reaction of 4j (a halogen-free substrate, Fig. 4c) and 9 (a secondary amide with no possibility of water generation, Fig. 4d) were not converted to the corresponding nitriles and alcohols, respectively. The reaction of 4a proceeded to afford 5a in the presence of 4j (Fig. 4e) and 9 (Fig. 4f) whereas the corresponding nitrile (5j) and alcohol (10) were not observed. The yield of 5a was dropped slightly to 71% when molecular sieves (4A) were added to the reaction mixture as dehydrating agents (Fig. 4g). Contrarily, the yield of 5a was neither increased nor decreased in presence of one mol equiv of water (Fig. 4h). The addition of 18O-water produced a trace amount of 18O-5a product (Fig. 4i) which suggests water is not directly involved in this reaction but it could take part via the equilibrium between phenylboronic acid and its corresponding anhydride50. Contrarily, the amount of 18O-5a was increased significantly (5a:18O-5a = 9:1) when 18O-2a (16O2:16O18O:18O2 = 14:23:64)51 was used as catalyst (Fig. 4j).In addition, 18O-5a was observed as the main product(5a:18O-5a = 1:3) when 150 mol% (1.5 molar equiv) of 18O-2a was used as additive (Fig. 4k). This increase of 18O in the product suggest the oxygen transfer proceeded via the phenylboronic acid.

Plausible catalytic pathway

A plausible catalytic pathway is proposed in Fig. 5. Initially, the amide substrates (4) present in a equilibrium with the corresponding imidic acid intermediate (11). Next, the base (K3PO4) deprotonate the intermediate 11 to form the intermediate 12. Next, intermediate 12 reacts with phenylboronic acid (2a) to form intermediate A. The hydroxyl group attached with boron acts as a nucleophile and substitutes the halide ion via nucleophilic substitutuion reaction to form intermediate B. Finally, a carbon-nitrogen triple (nitrile) bond formation regenerates the phenylboronic acid (2a) and affoard the product (5). Phenylboroxine (8) might generate after the end of the catalytic cycle.

Fig. 5: Plausible catalytic pathway.
figure 5

Initial deprotonation of amide in the presence of a base lowers the activation energy to form A.

DFT studies

To support our proposed reaction mechanism, we performed DFT calculations (see the Supporting Information and Supplementary Figs. 1 and 2). As shown in Fig. 6, our calculations suggested that the reaction proceeds through a two-step mechanism. First, a deprotonated amide substrate interacts with boronic acid 2a to form a tetrahedral boron intermediate A. An intramolecular nucleophilic substitution of the bromine with one OH group then occurs via the transition state TS1, which results in the intermediate B. The transition state was calculated to be 21.0 kcal/mol higher in energy compared to intermediate A. The second step is the cleavage of the C–O bond and formation of carbon-nitrogen triple bond. We found that K2HPO4 plays an essential role in the second step. One oxygen atom of K2HPO4 is coordinated to the boron atom in intermediate B’ where NH and POH protons are directed towards the PO and CO oxygen atoms, respectively. The NH and POH protons simultaneously transfer through a single transition state (TS2) to give the corresponding hydroxyalkyl nitrile (intermediate C). The activation energy for TS2 (26.7 kcal/mol) was slightly higher than that of TS1.

Fig. 6: Calculated reaction energy diagram for the oxygen transfer reaction (M06-2X/6-311 + G(d, p)).
figure 6

The C–O bond cleavage and nitrile formation procceds through a single transition state (TS2).

Conclusion

In summary, we found an oxygen transfer reaction during the sequential dehydration of primary alkyl amides and hydrolysis of alkyl halides to afford hydroxyalkyl nitriles, which was catalyzed by phenylboronic acid. In this reaction, a wide variety of substrates were tolerated and the catalyst could be recovered and reused. The reaction pathway for this unique transformation was proposed based on DFT calculations and control experiments. Complete mechanistic studies are now ongoing in our laboratory.

Methods

General procedure for the synthesis of hydroxynitrile derivatives. A mixture of phenylboronic acid 2a (20 mol%, 24.2 mg), an amide 4 (1 mol equiv, 1 mmol), and K3PO4 (3 mol equiv, 636 mg) was added to a reaction tube (see supplementary methods). The reaction tube was degassed under vacuum and refilled with N2 under standard Schlenk techniques (3 times). To the reaction mixture, 1,4-dioxane was added (2 mL). The reaction tube was sealed with a screw cap and teflon and then stirred at 115 °C under nitrogen for 72 h. Finally, the reaction was quenched with 1 N HCl, and the reaction mixture was extracted with EtOAc. The EtOAc layer was collected and dried over Na2SO4. The solvent was evaporated under vacuum, and the resulting crude mixture was purified by column chromatography (hexane/ethyl acetate) to give product 5.