Exploration driven by a medial preoptic circuit facilitates fear extinction in mice

Shin, Anna; Ryoo, Jia; Shin, Kwanhoo; Lee, Junesu; Bae, Seohui; Kim, Dae‐Gun; Park, Sae-Geun; Kim, Daesoo

doi:10.1038/s42003-023-04442-9

Download PDF

Article
Open access
Published: 27 January 2023

Exploration driven by a medial preoptic circuit facilitates fear extinction in mice

Anna Shin^1,2^na1,
Jia Ryoo^1,2^na1,
Kwanhoo Shin^1,2,
Junesu Lee^1,2,
Seohui Bae³,
Dae‐Gun Kim^1,2,4,
Sae-Geun Park¹ &
…
Daesoo Kim ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-9915-1463^1,2

Communications Biology volume 6, Article number: 106 (2023) Cite this article

1345 Accesses
2 Citations
2 Altmetric
Metrics details

Subjects

Abstract

Repetitive exposure to fear-associated targets is a typical treatment for patients with panic or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The success of exposure therapy depends on the active exploration of a fear-eliciting target despite an innate drive to avoid it. Here, we found that a circuit running from CaMKIIα-positive neurons of the medial preoptic area to the ventral periaqueductal gray (MPA-vPAG) facilitates the exploration of a fear-conditioned zone and subsequent fear extinction in mice. Activation or inhibition of this circuit did not induce preference/avoidance of a specific zone. Repeated entries into the fear-conditioned zone, induced by the motivation to chase a head-mounted object due to MPA-vPAG circuit photostimulation, facilitated fear extinction. Our results show how the brain forms extinction memory against avoidance of a fearful target and suggest a circuit-based mechanism of exposure therapy.

Microdosing with psilocybin mushrooms: a double-blind placebo-controlled study

Article Open access 02 August 2022

Emotions and brain function are altered up to one month after a single high dose of psilocybin

Article Open access 10 February 2020

From compulsivity to compulsion: the neural basis of compulsive disorders

Article 09 April 2024

Introduction

Extinction of fear memories requires the acquisition of new memories through exposure to the fear-conditioned target without the associated aversive unconditioned stimulus^1,2,3. Prolonged exposure (PE) therapy, which is a well-established therapy for patients suffering from fear memory-associated disorders, like post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), takes advantage of the mechanism of fear extinction^4,5,6. Studies have revealed some relevant brain areas and circuits involved in the extinction of fear memory^{7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16}.

During PE therapy, patients are forced to interact with the fear target or recall a fear memory even though this process is painful and induces strong avoidance against fear-eliciting targets, leading to clinical concerns regarding side effects such as exacerbation or dropout^17,18. To minimize avoidance effects, it is essential to consider the patient’s level of endurance and control the strength of exposure of the fear-eliciting target or fear memory recall appropriately^19,20. Unraveling the neural mechanism that induces motivation to explore a fear-eliciting target, which can reduce this avoidance, may facilitate the development of additional efficient exposure therapies and/or drugs.

The medial preoptic area (MPA) is known to regulate approach behaviors and exploratory interactions with a variety of targets^{21,22,23,24,25}. Also, the ventral periaqueductal gray (vPAG), which receives a strong input from the MPA^26,27, is well known to be involved in modulating approaching (fight) or avoiding (flight) behaviors^28,29 and hunting behaviors^30,31. Recent studies have revealed that MPA projections to the vPAG mediate novelty seeking, exploration, hunting behaviors, and approach to a variety of targets^32,33,34.

Park et al have shown in a previous study that calcium calmodulin kinase 2 alpha (CaMKIIα)-positive neurons in the MPA increase the exploratory drive toward objects and contribute to hunting behavior through their projections to the vPAG. The authors used this finding to develop a brain-computer interface technology, MPA-induced drive-assisted steering (MIDAS), wherein explorative drive was controlled by MIDAS to guide animals along a predicted pathway during chasing of a head-mounted object³². Here, we tested whether MPA-vPAG-induced explorative drive can facilitate approach to a fear-eliciting target and thereby contribute to fear extinction.

Results

A focal zone-fear paradigm to evaluate avoidance and approach behaviors

In conventional fear conditioning or extinction, subject animals are tested in a closed chamber where they are unable to approach or escape. To compare avoidance and approach factors, we designed a focal zone-fear paradigm using a chamber consisting of two zones (Fig. 1a): a safe zone (40 × 40 × 45 cm) and a shock zone with an electrical grid floor (30 × 30 × 45 cm). A fear-extinction schedule was utilized (Fig. 1b): On day-1 (pre-test), the basal activity of mice was recorded in the focal fear chamber. On day-2 (post-test), subject mice were trapped in the shock zone and given electrical foot shocks (1 mA, 5-second duration; total, 3 times) (Fig. 1c). We compared their behavior in the chamber for 5 min before (pre) and after (post) the foot shocks (Fig. 1d). Fear conditioning decreased time inside, entries into and locomotion inside the shock zone (Fig. 1e–g) while increasing time spent freezing (Fig. 1h). These data indicate that we can measure the approach and avoidance behavior of mice during focal zone-fear conditioning.

**Fig. 1: A focal zone-fear paradigm for fear conditioning.**

Exploration of the fear-conditioned zone facilitates fear extinction

Next, we sought to determine the effect of the exploratory behavior induced by the stimulation of the MPA-vPAG circuit on fear memory extinction. To stimulate the MPA-vPAG circuit, we injected adeno-associated viruses (AAV) harboring the channelrhodopsin-2 gene (ChR2) under the control of the CaMKIIα promoter into the MPA (Fig. 2a). We then inserted an optic fiber over the vPAG, where the axons of ChR2-expressing MPA neurons terminate (Fig. 2b). AAV-CaMKIIα−mCherry virus was injected in separate control mice (Supplementary Fig. 1a). To conduct the focal zone-fear paradigm task, mice underwent daily exploration sessions from day-2 (post) to day-9: mice received light stimulation in the shock zone for 5 min. Twenty-four hours after each exploration session, mice from both groups were subjected to an exploration test in which they were allowed to roam freely throughout the focal fear chamber for 5 min as the extinction session (Fig. 2c).

**Fig. 2: Exploration of the fear-conditioned zone induces fear extinction.**

During the exploration period, the ChR2 group showed more movement in the shock zone than the control group (Supplementary Fig. 1b, c). This indicated that stimulation of the MPA-vPAG circuit significantly increased the exploratory behavior of mice in a fear-conditioned zone. To assess the effect of MPA-vPAG circuit stimulation on fear extinction, we conducted extinction tests for both groups. The results indicated that the ChR2 group moved more in the shock zone than the control group, with a significant difference seen from day-8 to day-10 (Fig. 2d, e). In addition, significant differences in the time spent in the shock zone (Fig. 2f) were seen from day-5. Significant differences in the number of entries into the shock zone (Fig. 2g) were seen from day-7. The percentage of freezing in the ChR2 group significantly decreased compared to controls from day-4 (Fig. 2h). These results suggest that the increased exploration behavior in the fear-conditioned zone involved the extinction of zone dependent fear memory, and that the fear-extinction effect triggered by stimulating the MPA-vPAG circuit was increased by repeated trials.

To verify whether the fear-extinction effect via MPA-vPAG circuit stimulation also works in a safe zone, which is near the fear-conditioning zone, we performed a modified focal zone-fear conditioning task. Mice received photostimulation in the safe zone instead of the shock zone during the exploration period (Fig. 2i). Photostimulation increased movement in the safe zone of ChR2 mice, exhibiting higher exploration than controls (Supplementary Fig. 2a, b). In the extinction test, the ChR2 group did not show significant differences in movement in the shock zone after conditioning (Fig. 2j). Basal activity was significantly different, but the total movement was unchanged (Supplementary Fig. 2c). The percentage time spent freezing (Fig. 2k), time spent in the shock zone (Supplementary Fig. 2d), and number of entries in to the shock zone (Supplementary Fig. 2e) were unchanged. These results suggest that photoactivation of the MPA-vPAG circuit in the safe zone during the exploration period did not induce a fear extinction effect.

Photoinhibition of the MPA-vPAG circuit does not affect exploration-mediate fear extinction

To test to whether activity of the MPA-vPAG circuit is necessary for fear extinction driven by exploration, we performed the focal zone-fear conditioning test while photoinhibiting the circuit using a light-gated chloride channel (eNpHR3.0) (Fig. 3a, b). We bilaterally injected AAV-CaMKIIα-eNpHR-eYFP virus into the MPA and bilaterally implanted optic fibers over the vPAG (Fig. 3c). AAV-CaMKIIα-eGFP virus was injected in control mice (Supplementary Fig. 3a). During the exploration period, there were no statistically significant differences in the distance moved between eNpHR mice and control mice (Supplementary Fig. 3b), whereas on day-2 (post) eNpHR mice moved less and on day-9 eNpHR mice moved more compared to control mice (Supplementary Fig. 3c). Although there was a difference in movement on day-2 (post) and day-9 during the exploration period, no differences in movement (Fig. 3d and Supplementary Fig. 3d), time spent (Fig. 3e), number of entries in the shock zone (Fig. 3f), and percentage time spent freezing (Fig. 3g) were observed between the eNpHR and eGFP groups in the extinction test.

**Fig. 3: Photoinhibition of the MPA-vPAG circuit does not affect exploration mediated fear extinction.**

Photoactivation of the MPA-vPAG circuit facilitates exploration without affecting place preference

Next, we tested whether the facilitated fear extinction observed in the ChR2 group was due to association of the shock zone with reward, due to photoactivation of the MPA-vPAG circuit. To address this, we examined how photoactivation of the MPA-vPAG circuit affected the results of a conditioned place-preference (CPP) test. In this paradigm, photoactivation was administered in daily training sessions (over 6 days). Mice received photostimulation in zone b but did not receive it in the corridor or in zone a. The effect of CPP was tested on day-8 without any accompanying photostimulation (Fig. 4a, b).

**Fig. 4: MPA-vPAG circuit stimulation increases place exploration behavior.**

Before photoactivation, we did not observe any differences in the ratio of total time spent in zone b, between ChR2 (MPA-vPAG^ChR2, CaMKIIα-ChR2-mCherry virus-injected) and control (MPA-vPAG^mCherry, CaMKIIα-mCherry virus injected) mice (Supplementary Fig. 4a–d). From conditioning day-1 (C1) to conditioning day-6 (C6), the ChR2 group showed preference to zone b while the control group did not (Fig. 4c and Supplementary Fig. 4e–h). However, on day-8, neither group showed any difference in place preference (Fig. 4d–g). These results show that although photoactivation of the MPA-vPAG circuit increases exploration, it does not induce conditioned place preference.

Photoinhibition of the MPA-vPAG circuit does not affect place preference

We performed the CPP protocol while photoinhibiting the MPA-vPAG circuit, which was operationalized using mice expressing eNpHR and illumination with an appropriate wavelength of light (Fig. 4h, i). Over the whole series of CPP sessions, MPA-vPAG^eNpHR mice showed no significant increase in preference or avoidance compared to MPA-vPAG^eGFP mice (Fig. 4j). Prior to light stimulation, we did not observe any significant increase in the preference or avoidance of a specific chamber for MPA-vPAG^eGFP mice (CaMKIIα-eGFP virus-injected mice) (Supplementary Fig. 5a, b) or MPA-vPAG^eNpHR mice (CaMKIIα-eNpHR-eYFP virus-injected mice) (Supplementary Fig. 5c, d). On conditioning day-1, we did not observe any difference in the time spent in zone a vs. zone b under 589 nm illumination for MPA-vPAG^eGFP mice (Supplementary Fig. 5e, f) or MPA-vPAG^eNpHR mice (Supplementary Fig. 5g, h). In the test session, neither MPA-vPAG^eGFP mice (Fig. 4k, l) nor MPA-vPAG^eNpHR mice (Fig. 4m, n) showed a significant difference in the time spent in zone a vs. zone b. These results indicate that MPA-vPAG circuit inhibition does not affect place preference or aversion.

Object-guided exploration of the fear-conditioned zone facilitates fear extinction

We next attempted to induce fear extinction by exposing mice to the shock zone. To increase the number of entries into the fear-conditioned zone, we used MIDAS to guide animal behavior by activating MPA neurons that project to the vPAG to support object-craving behaviors³². To stimulate the MPA-vPAG circuit, we injected AAV-CaMKIIα-ChR2-mCherry into the MPA of mice. We then inserted an optic fiber over the vPAG, where the axon terminals of ChR2-expressing MPA neurons are located (Fig. 5a). The heads of the mice were fitted with a device comprising of a bait object controlled by a servomotor, a Wi-Fi communication module, and an LED stimulator (Fig. 5b). 24 h prior to day-1, we placed each mouse into the focal fear chamber for 5 min of habituation. After shock was administered on day-1 (post), we performed fear extinction with MIDAS (Fig. 5c). We used MIDAS to guide the mice into the fear-conditioned zone five times during the extinction session by inducing them to chase the head-mounted object through a round-trip pathway, that passed through both the safe zone and the shock zone. As a control, we exposed another group of mice to the chamber without MIDAS for 5 min (Fig. 5d).

**Fig. 5: MIDAS-driven shock zone exploration induces fear extinction.**

To evaluate how MIDAS-induced entries into the fear-conditioned zone affected fear extinction, we compared the effect of exposure between the groups during the extinction test. We found that the MIDAS group showed more robust fear extinction than the control group. The percentage of distance moved, time spent, and number of entries in the shock zone were significantly increased in the MIDAS group after day-6 (Fig. 5e–g). Lower percentage of time spent freezing was noticed in the MIDAS group but not statistically significant (Fig. 5h). These results indicate that object-guided exploration of the fear-conditioned zone facilitates fear extinction.

Discussion

Fear memories can induce long-term maladaptive fear responses, including avoidance^35,36,37. Extinction of these fear memories involves acquiring new memory through exposure to a fear conditioned target without an aversive unconditioned stimulus^1,2,3. In fear memory extinction experiments using animal models⁷, it has been difficult to verify the effects of exploration because the animals showed avoidance responses to the fear conditioned target. Thus, the effect of direct exploration on fear memory extinction is not well understood. In previous fear extinction studies, researchers have focused on avoidance and fear responses mediated by the medial prefrontal cortex, amygdala function or hypothalamic stress^{38,39,40,41,42}, but research on brain circuits that increase the desire to explore have not been conducted for fear extinction.

During PE, patients are exposed to fear-eliciting targets or traumatic memories to extinguish fear. However, the mechanism underlying the curing effects of PE remains unknown^4,5,6. To study the mechanism of fear extinction in animal models, many researchers have used a closed cage, which makes it difficult to independently evaluate the effect of approach or escape. Using a focal fear-conditioning paradigm, we evaluated the approach of a fear-conditioned zone from a non-conditioned zone (Fig. 1) and found that photoactivation of the MPA-vPAG circuit facilitates fear extinction by strengthening approach (Fig. 2, 5).

Studies have shown that photostimulation of reward circuits (e.g., dopaminergic neurons in the ventral tegmental area) increases place preference⁴³ and modulates fear-related memories^44,45,46,47. Our present results suggest that the role of the MPA-vPAG circuit in fear extinction is unlikely to be due to the modulation of place preference or avoidance (Fig. 4). Instead, the increase in exploration through MPA-vPAG circuit stimulation significantly induced the extinction of the fear memory (Fig. 2e–h and Supplementary Fig. 1). During the MIDAS induced fear extinction test, MIDAS mice experienced photostimulation of the MPA-vPAG circuits equally in both safe and shock zones during round-trip movements between both zones, but showed fear extinction (Fig. 5). Our study suggests that the role of this circuit in inducing fear extinction is due to active exploration, rather than a reward-related effect.

Fear extinction was induced only when photostimulation of the MPA-vPAG circuit increased the explorative activity of mice directly in the shock zone (Figs. 2a–h), but photostimulation of the MPA-vPAG circuit without exploration of the fear-conditioned zone did not facilitate fear extinction (Fig. 2i–k). Direct exploration towards the fear-conditioned zone by photostimulation of this circuit, not only increased movement, but also potentially increased the chance to recall the fear memory and facilitate fear extinction. However, photoinhibition of the MPA-vPAG circuit showed similar amounts of exploration and did not affect preference or avoidance during both real-time and conditioning sessions (Supplementary Fig. 3. and Fig. 4h–n). The amount of exploration was not sufficient to affect fear extinction compared to controls (Fig. 3). Consistently, studies have shown that recall of fear memories is required for effective fear extinction, and have implicated the dentate gyrus in memory recall and the attenuation of contextual fear^48,49. Silencing of fear memory recall was also found to engage dentate gyrus engrams and slow behavioral extinction⁵⁰. Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR), a psychotherapeutic method developed by Francine Shapiro⁵¹ to treat symptoms of trauma, also involves recall of fear memory^52,53,54. Thus, active exploration towards a fearful target induced by the MPA-vPAG circuit may change the decision-making process depending on the extinction memory through memory recall.

In the present study, we found that MPA-vPAG circuit stimulation facilitated fear extinction through fear-conditioned target exploration and revealed that the fear extinction achieved by prolonged exposure seems to depend heavily on internal states, such as motivation to explore the fear-related target. Animals in the natural environment face a conflict between exploration and avoidance, especially when they need to forage for food. A balance between exploration and fear-circuit mechanisms may contribute to the outcome of this debate. The MPA is a sexually dimorphic region of the brain that is known to have different behaviors depending on sex²². However, there were no difference in PE effects according to sex among PTSD patients⁵⁵, and in previous studies, exploration or approach function of the MPA did not depend on the sex of rodents^24,33. Nevertheless, gender differences in MPA mediated fear extinction have to be studied in the future. Our findings suggest that the MPA-vPAG circuit is a pharmacological and psychological target of an efficient method to improve patients’ quality of life with emotional disorders.

Methods

Animals

All behavioral experiments were performed on 9- to 11-week-old male C57BL/6 J mice. The mice had free access to food and water and were kept on a 12-h light-dark cycle at 22 °C. All care and handling of mice was performed according to the directives of the Animal Care and Use Committee of KAIST (Protocol No. KA2020-63). The study received ethical approval (KA2020-65, KA2022-038, KA2022-077-v1).

Virus injection and fiber-optic cannula implantation

Mice were anesthetized before surgery with 2,2,2-tribromoethanol via intraperitoneal injection. For activation of the MPA-vPAG circuit, the MPA (AP, +0.2 mm; ML, 0.3 mm; DV, −5.2 mm, from bregma) was injected with 0.5 µl AAV2/9-CaMKIIα-hChR2(H134R)-mCherry (Addgene, USA) or AAV2/5-CaMKIIα-mCherry (University of North Carolina Vector Core, USA). For inhibition, 0.5 µl AAV2/5-CaMKIIα-eNpHR3.0-eYFP (University of North Carolina Vector Core, USA) or AAV2/5-CaMKIIα-eGFP (University of North Carolina Vector Core, USA) was used instead. A fiber-optic cannula (200 µm diameter; Doric Lenses, Canada) was implanted in the vPAG (AP, −4.7 mm; ML, +0.3 mm; DV, −2.6 mm) unilaterally for activation experiments. Dual optic fibers (200 µm diameter, Doric Lenses, Canada) were implanted in the vPAG (AP, −4.7 mm; ML, ±0.3 mm; DV, −2.6 mm) for the inhibition tests. As a last step, the skull was covered with dental cement (Vertex, Netherlands). All mice were given a recovery period of 3–4 weeks before any behavioral experiment was attempted.

Contextual fear extinction

All trials were performed in a chamber that was custom made for these experiments. The chamber consisted of two rooms, a safe zone (40 × 40 × 45 cm) and a shock zone (30 × 30 × 45 cm), connected by a hole (30 × 15 cm). The shock zone was equipped with a stainless-steel grid floor connected to a shock generator (Coulbourn Instruments, USA). The non-shock chamber had black and white striped walls intended to help mice distinguish the chambers from one another. Trials were conducted for 10 days. On day-1, each mouse was placed in the center of the safe zone and allowed to explore both zones for 5 min freely. The mouse was trapped in the shock zone, and electrical foot shocks were administered. The foot shock interval was 5 min, and 1 mA foot shock was given 3 times in 15 min. From days-2 through 10, the mice were placed in the center of the safe zone and their activity was recorded for 5 min (extinction test). After the extinction test, the mice of both groups were trapped in the shock zone for 5 min. During this period, the mice were exposed to 20 Hz 5 ms 473 nm light (3 mW) or continuous wavelength 589 nm light (10 mW). For the modified focal zone-fear conditioning test, the mice of both groups were walled in the safe zone for 5 min after the extinction test. The mice received light stimulation (473 nm, 20 Hz, 5 ms) during this period. To test the effect of MIDAS on fear extinction, mice were divided into a MIDAS group (n = 5) and a control group (n = 5) and trials were conducted for 10 days. On day-1, fear conditioning by electrical foot shocks was performed as described above. From days-1 through 9, the mice were placed in the center of the safe zone and their activity was recorded for 5 min. After the extinction test, the behavior of the mice in the MIDAS group was modulated via the MIDAS system. We set the center point of each chamber as a waypoint and guided each mouse on a round trip between the waypoints using the MIDAS monitoring system and navigation algorithm. We repeated this round trip five times per mouse over the course of 5 min. Mice in the control group were exposed to the chamber for the same amount of time without MIDAS application. We automatically analyzed the recording data by EthoVision XT software (Noldus, UK) for the distance moved, time in the shock zone, the number of entries into the shock zone, and freezing (using activity analysis, non-moving state duration of more than 2 s)⁵⁶. We calculated the percentage of distance moved in the shock zone as follows:

$$({{{{{\rm{Distance}}}}}}\; {{{{{\rm{moved}}}}}}\; {{{{{\rm{in}}}}}}\; {{{{{\rm{shock}}}}}}\; {{{{{\rm{zone}}}}}}\times 100)/{{{{{\rm{Total}}}}}}\; {{{{{\rm{distance}}}}}}\; {{{{{\rm{moved}}}}}}\; {{{{{\rm{in}}}}}}\; {{{{{\rm{both}}}}}}\; {{{{{\rm{zones}}}}}}.$$

(1)

We also calculated the percentage of time spent freezing, as follows:

$$({{{{{\rm{Time}}}}}}\; {{{{{\rm{in}}}}}}\; {{{{{\rm{freezing}}}}}}\times 100)/{{{{{\rm{Total}}}}}}\; {{{{{\rm{recording}}}}}}\; {{{{{\rm{time}}}}}}.$$

(2)

Head-mounted control device design

To remotely induce object-following behavior in mice, we applied the MIDAS system, where a head-mounted device modulates photostimulation and target-object direction using a servomotor³². The head-mounted device was comprised of five components: an embedded chipset, an LED module, a target object, a servomotor module, and a battery. The RFD22301 embedded chipset (RFduino, USA) comprised of a microcontroller (ARM Cortex-M3, STM32F101V8T6) and a built-in Bluetooth antenna. The chipset operated the LED and servomotor modules through the MIDAS algorithm, which was programmed in the Arduino IDE (Arduino, 2015). The LED module delivered power to the LED-optic cannula and modulated the frequency of photostimulation over a 0–40 Hz range. In our experiments, we fixed the light intensity at the tip of the optic cannula to 3 mW and used a red Styrofoam sphere (3.5 cm diameter covered with paper) connected to the servomotor via a carbon fiber as the target object. The servomotor (maximum output angle, 180° resolutions, 5°; Hobbyking, USA) steered the movement of the mouse by rotating the target object through its visual field. This device used a 3.7 V lithium-polymer type battery. The entire head-mounted control device (28 × 15 × 21 mm, 23.5 g) was firmly inserted into the external connector of the LED-optic cannula during the experiments and detached afterwards.

MIDAS algorithm

Mouse positional information $P\left({x}_{m},{y}_{m}\right)$ and the n^th waypoint ${w}_{n}\left({x}_{w},{y}_{w}\right)$ obtained from the CMOS camera (Point Grey, Canada) was analyzed at every time-step (30 ms). In the algorithm, the head angle, ${\theta }_{h},$ indicates the angle between a horizontal line and the head direction and the waypoint angle, ${\theta }_{w}$, is defined as

$${\theta }_{w}={\tan }^{-1}\left(\frac{{y}_{w}-{y}_{m}}{{x}_{w}-{x}_{m}}\right),$$

(3)

where ${\theta }_{o}$ represents the angle between the object direction and a horizontal line. Depending on the calculated angle, ${\theta }_{w}$, the servomotor rotated the target object to the angle closest to ${\theta }_{w}$. The target object was made to follow the route to the waypoint, ${\theta }_{o}\to {\theta }_{w}$, regardless of mouse movement. Photostimulation (0–40 Hz) via the LED module was activated at

$${{{{{{\rm{|}}}}}}\theta }_{o}-{\theta }_{h}{{{{{\rm{|}}}}}}\le 15^\circ .$$

(4)

The MIDAS system algorithm was programmed in Microsoft Visual C++ using the OpenCV library.

External monitoring system for MIDAS

A CMOS camera (Point Grey, Canada) above each chamber or maze was used to track mouse paths. The monitoring system computed mouse head positions and angles in real time by applying a color-detection algorithm to the image data acquired via a camera. In addition, a task management tool was used to transmit information to the head-mounted control device via Bluetooth.

Conditioned place-preference test

The custom-made place-preference chamber contained two rooms (20 cm × 18 cm) with different patterns on the walls and a corridor between them. EthoVision XT software (Noldus, UK) and a camera (LifeCam, Microsoft, USA) were used to detect and analyze the center point of each mouse to guide the delivery of light stimulation. For CPP tests, we tested the baseline preference on day-1 for 15 min. After allowing the mice to freely explore the chamber, we excluded mice that showed a place preference higher than 65%. During the conditioning session, the mice explored the chamber for 30 min while light stimulation was paired with only one side. The light-paired room was counterbalanced. To avoid excitotoxicity in the activation group, the 473 nm light was turned off when a mouse remained in the light-paired room for longer than 30 s. If the mouse remained in the light-paired room for 1 min after the light was turned off, the light was turned on again. A 589 nm light remained on continuously during the tracking of mouse center points for the inhibition group mice who remained in the light-pair chamber as zone b. On day-8, we recorded 15 min of free exploration without light stimulation. We calculated the percentage of time each mouse spent exploring zone b by dividing the time in the light-paired chamber by the sum of the time in both chambers, as follows:

$$({{{{{\rm{Time}}}}}}\; {{{{{\rm{in}}}}}}\; {{{{{\rm{light}}}}}}-{{{{{\rm{paired}}}}}}\; {{{{{\rm{chamber}}}}}}\times 100)/{{{{{\rm{Time}}}}}}\; {{{{{\rm{in}}}}}}\; {{{{{\rm{both}}}}}}\; {{{{{\rm{chambers}}}}}}.$$

(5)

Histology

Mice were anesthetized and perfused with heparin sodium salt in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and then 4% formaldehyde solution. After post-fixation, the brains were sectioned (60 μm thickness) in a vibratome (Leica VT1200S, Leica, Wetzlar, Germany). Brain sections were mounted with Vectashield Hardset antifade mounting medium with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, United States). Brain sections were imaged under an A1 HD25 high-resolution confocal microscope (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) and analyzed using NIS-Elements AR analysis software (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan).

Statistics and Reproducibility

No statistical analysis was used to predetermine sample sizes. Experimental findings were reliably reproduced among all subjects in all experiments comprised of multiple cohort. Optogenetic experiments were conducted with more than 3 cohorts of animals. All statistical analyses were performed using SigmaPlot (12.0; Systat Software). An unpaired two-tailed t-test or Mann-Whitney rank sum test was used to compare data from pairs of experimental groups. Paired two-tailed t-tests or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to compare data obtained before and after experiments in the same group. Two-way RM ANOVA tests were performed for multiple comparisons. The test methods and p-values are indicated in the supplementary data 1. All statistical tests were two-sided, and p-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Data availability

Source data and statistical comparisons underlying the main figures are presented in Supplementary Data 1. The raw, unprocessed datasets from the current study were not deposited to a public repository due to their large size but are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Code availability

The code related to the MIDAS system is available at https://github.com/Daegun-Kim/MIDAS, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7437597.

References

Bouton, M. E. Context and behavioral processes in extinction. Learn. Mem. 11, 485–494 (2004).
Article Google Scholar
Quirk, G. J. & Mueller, D. Neural mechanisms of extinction learning and retrieval. Neuropsychopharmacology 33, 56–72 (2008).
Article Google Scholar
Quirk, G. J. et al. Erasing fear memories with extinction training. J. Neurosci. 30, 14993–14997 (2010).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Mello, P. G. et al. An update on the efficacy of cognitive-behavioral therapy, cognitive therapy, and exposure therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder. Int. J. Psychiatry Med. 46, 339–357 (2013).
Article Google Scholar
Rauch, S. A., Eftekhari, A. & Ruzek, J. I. Review of exposure therapy: a gold standard for PTSD treatment. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 49, 679–688 (2012).
Article Google Scholar
Powers, M. B. et al. A meta-analytic review of prolonged exposure for posttraumatic stress disorder. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 30, 635–641 (2010).
Article Google Scholar
Herry, C. et al. Neuronal circuits of fear extinction. Eur. J. Neurosci. 31, 599–612 (2010).
Article Google Scholar
Quirk, G. J., Garcia, R. & González-Lima, F. Prefrontal mechanisms in extinction of conditioned fear. Biol. psychiatry 60, 337–343 (2006).
Article Google Scholar
Sotres-Bayon, F., Cain, C. K. & LeDoux, J. E. Brain mechanisms of fear extinction: historical perspectives on the contribution of prefrontal cortex. Biol. psychiatry 60, 329–336 (2006).
Article Google Scholar
Cho, J. H., Deisseroth, K. & Bolshakov, V. Y. Synaptic encoding of fear extinction in mPFC-amygdala circuits. Neuron 80, 1491–1507 (2013).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Kim, J. J. & Jung, M. W. Neural circuits and mechanisms involved in Pavlovian fear conditioning: a critical review. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 30, 188–202 (2006).
Article Google Scholar
Barad, M., Gean, P. W. & Lutz, B. The role of the amygdala in the extinction of conditioned fear. Biol. psychiatry 60, 322–328 (2006).
Article Google Scholar
Likhtik, E. et al. Amygdala intercalated neurons are required for expression of fear extinction. Nature 454, 642–645 (2008).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Amano, T., Cagri, T. U. & Paré, D. Synaptic correlates of fear extinction in the amygdala. Nat. Neurosci. 13, 489–494 (2010).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Corcoran, K. A. et al. Hippocampal inactivation disrupts the acquisition and contextual encoding of fear extinction. J. Neurosci. 25, 8978–8987 (2005).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Peters, J. et al. Induction of fear extinction with hippocampal-infralimbic BDNF. Science 328, 1288–1290 (2010).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Larsen, S. E. et al. Symptom exacerbations in trauma-focused treatments: associations with treatment outcome and non-completion. Behav. Res. Ther. 77, 68–77 (2016).
Article Google Scholar
Kilpatrick, D. G. & Best, C. L. Some cautionary remarks on treating sexual assault victims with implosion. Behav. Ther. 15(4), 421–423 (1984).
Article Google Scholar
Zhou, Y. et al. Developments of prolonged exposure in treatment effect of post‐traumatic stress disorder and controlling dropout rate: a meta‐analytic review. Clin. Psychol. Psychother. 27, 449–462 (2020).
Article Google Scholar
Van Minnen, A., Arntz, A. & Keijsers, G. P. J. Prolonged exposure in patients with chronic PTSD: predictors of treatment outcome and dropout. Behav. Res. Ther. 40, 439–457 (2002).
Article Google Scholar
Tan, N. et al. Lateral hypothalamus calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II α neurons encode novelty-seeking signals to promote predatory eating. Research 2022, 9802382 (2022).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Wei, Y. C. et al. Medial preoptic area in mice is capable of mediating sexually dimorphic behaviors regardless of gender. Nat. Commun. 9, 1–15 (2018).
Article Google Scholar
Dulac, C., O’Connell, L. A. & Wu, Z. Neural control of maternal and paternal behaviors. Science 345, 765–770 (2014).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Zhang, G. W. et al. Medial preoptic area antagonistically mediates stress-induced anxiety and parental behavior. Nat. Neurosci. 24, 516–528 (2021).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Tsuneoka, Y. & Funato, H. Cellular composition of the preoptic area regulating sleep, parental, and sexual behavior.Front. Neurosci. 15, 649159 (2021).
Article Google Scholar
Rizvi, T. A., Ennis, M. & Shipley, M. T. Reciprocal connections between the medial preoptic area and the midbrain periaqueductal gray in rat: a WGA‐HRP and PHA‐L study. J. Comp. Neurol. 315, 1–15 (1992).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Rizvi, T. A. et al. Medial preoptic area afferents to periaqueductal gray medullo-output neurons: a combined Fos and tract tracing study. J. Neurosci. 16, 333–344 (1996).
Article CAS Google Scholar
McNaughton, N. & Corr, P. J. Survival circuits and risk assessment. Curr. Opin. Behav. Sci. 24, 14–20 (2018).
Article Google Scholar
Bandler, R. & Shipley, M. T. Columnar organization in the midbrain periaqueductal gray: modules for emotional expression? Trends Neurosci. 17, 379–389 (1994).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Li, Y. et al. Hypothalamic circuits for predation and evasion. Neuron 97, 911–924 (2018).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Han, W. et al. Integrated control of predatory hunting by the central nucleus of the amygdala. Cell 168, 311–324 (2017).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Park, S. G. et al. Medial preoptic circuit induces hunting-like actions to target objects and prey. Nat. Neurosci. 21, 364–372 (2018).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Ryoo, J., Park, S. & Kim, D. An inhibitory medial preoptic circuit mediates innate exploration. Front. Neurosci. 15, 716147 (2021).
Park, S., Ryoo, J. & Kim, D. Neural and genetic basis of evasion, approach and predation. Mol. Cells 45, 93 (2022).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Edition, Fifth. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. Am. Psychiatr. Assoc. 21, 591-643 (2013).
Galovski, T. & Lyons, J. A. Psychological sequelae of combat violence: a review of the impact of PTSD on the veteran’s family and possible interventions. Aggress. violent Behav. 9, 477–501 (2004).
Article Google Scholar
Smith, M. W., Schnurr, P. P. & Rosenheck, R. A. Employment outcomes and PTSD symptom severity. Ment. health Serv. Res. 7, 89–101 (2005).
Article Google Scholar
Charney, D. S. et al. Psychobiologic mechanisms of posttraumatic stress disorder. Arch. Gen. psychiatry 50, 294–305 (1993).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Charney, D. S. Psychobiological mechanisms of resilience and vulnerability: implications for successful adaptation to extreme stress. Am. J. Psychiatry 161, 195–216 (2004).
Article Google Scholar
Etkin, A. & Wager, T. D. Functional neuroimaging of anxiety: a meta-analysis of emotional processing in PTSD, social anxiety disorder, and specific phobia. Am. J. Psychiatry 164, 1476–1488 (2007).
Article Google Scholar
Hayes, J. P., Hayes, S. M. & Mikedis, A. M. Quantitative meta-analysis of neural activity in posttraumatic stress disorder. Biol. Mood Anxiety Disord. 2, 1–13 (2012).
Article Google Scholar
Zoladz, P. R. & Diamond, D. M. Current status on behavioral and biological markers of PTSD: a search for clarity in a conflicting literature. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 37, 860–895 (2013).
Article Google Scholar
Tsai, H. C. et al. Phasic firing in dopaminergic neurons is sufficient for behavioral conditioning. Science 324, 1080–1084 (2009).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Luo, R. et al. A dopaminergic switch for fear to safety transitions. Nat. Commun. 9, 1–11 (2018).
Article Google Scholar
Salinas-Hernández, X. I. & Duvarci, S. Dopamine in fear extinction. Front. Synaptic Neurosci. 13, 635879 (2021).
Article Google Scholar
Kalisch, R., Gerlicher, A. M. V. & Duvarci, S. A dopaminergic basis for fear extinction. Trends Cogn. Sci. 23, 274–277 (2019).
Article Google Scholar
Cai, L. X. et al. Distinct signals in medial and lateral VTA dopamine neurons modulate fear extinction at different times. Elife 9, e54936 (2020).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Kitamura, T. et al. Engrams and circuits crucial for systems consolidation of a memory. Science 356, 73–78 (2017).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Bernier, B. E. et al. Dentate gyrus contributes to retrieval as well as encoding: evidence from context fear conditioning, recall, and extinction. J. Neurosci. 37, 6359–6371 (2017).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Khalaf, O. et al. Reactivation of recall-induced neurons contributes to remote fear memory attenuation. Science 360, 1239–1242 (2018).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Shapiro, F. Eye movement desensitization: a new treatment for post-traumatic stress disorder. J. Behav. Ther. Exp. psychiatry 20, 211–217 (1989).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Davidson, P. R. & Parker, K. C. H. Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR): a meta-analysis. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 69, 305 (2001).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Chen, L. et al. Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing versus cognitive-behavioral therapy for adult posttraumatic stress disorder: systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 203, 443–451 (2015).
Article Google Scholar
Baek, J. et al. Neural circuits underlying a psychotherapeutic regimen for fear disorders. Nature 566, 339–343 (2019).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Khan, A. J. et al. How do gender and military sexual trauma impact PTSD symptoms in cognitive processing therapy and prolonged exposure? J. Psychiatr. Res. 130, 89–96 (2020).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Herry, C. et al. Switching on and off fear by distinct neuronal circuits. Nature 454, 600–606 (2008).
Article CAS Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants from Samsung Science & Technology (SSTF-BA1301-53). This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean government (MSIT) (NRF- 2022R1A2C3013280). This research was supported by the Bio & Medical Technology Development Program of the National Research Foundation (NRF) funded by the Korean government (MSIT) (NRF-2019M3E5D2A01066259).This paper is based on a research which has been conducted as part of the KAIST-funded Global Singularity Research Program for 2022.

Author information

These authors contributed equally: Anna Shin, Jia Ryoo.

Authors and Affiliations

Department of Biological Sciences, KAIST, Daejeon, 34141, Republic of Korea
Anna Shin, Jia Ryoo, Kwanhoo Shin, Junesu Lee, Dae‐Gun Kim, Sae-Geun Park & Daesoo Kim
Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, KAIST, Daejeon, 34141, Republic of Korea
Anna Shin, Jia Ryoo, Kwanhoo Shin, Junesu Lee, Dae‐Gun Kim & Daesoo Kim
KAIST Institute of Artificial Intelligence, KAIST, Daejeon, 34141, Republic of Korea
Seohui Bae
ACTNOVA, Daejeon, 34109, Republic of Korea
Dae‐Gun Kim

Authors

Anna Shin
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Jia Ryoo
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Kwanhoo Shin
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Junesu Lee
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Seohui Bae
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Dae‐Gun Kim
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Sae-Geun Park
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Daesoo Kim
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

A.S. and S.G.P. designed the experiments; S.G.P., D.G.K., and S.H.B. performed the MIDAS-induced fear extinction test; J.R. and A.S. performed the focal zone-fear paradigm. J.R., A.S., K.S, and J.L. performed the conditioned place preference test; J.R., A.S., S.G.P., and D.G.K. analyzed the data; A.S. and J.R. drafted the manuscript; D.K. edited the manuscript; and all authors reviewed and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daesoo Kim.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Communications Biology thanks Sevil Duvarci and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editor: George Inglis. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Peer Review File

Supplementary Information

Description of Additional Supplementary Files

Supplementary Data 1

Reporting Summary

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shin, A., Ryoo, J., Shin, K. et al. Exploration driven by a medial preoptic circuit facilitates fear extinction in mice. Commun Biol 6, 106 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-023-04442-9

Download citation

Received: 14 February 2022
Accepted: 09 January 2023
Published: 27 January 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-023-04442-9

This article is cited by

Memory Trace for Fear Extinction: Fragile yet Reinforceable
- Ying Liu
- Shuai Ye
- Wei-Guang Li
Neuroscience Bulletin (2023)

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.