Abstract
The fast-growing bacterium Vibrio natriegens has recently gained increasing attention as a novel chassis organism for fundamental research and biotechnology. To fully harness the potential of this bacterium, highly efficient genome editing methods are indispensable to create strains tailored for specific applications. V. natriegens is able to take up free DNA and incorporate it into its genome by homologous recombination. This highly efficient natural transformation is able to mediate uptake of multiple DNA fragments, thereby allowing for multiple simultaneous edits. Here, we describe NT-CRISPR, a combination of natural transformation with CRISPR-Cas9 counterselection. In two temporally distinct steps, we first performed a genome edit by natural transformation and second, induced CRISPR-Cas9 targeting the wild type sequence, and thus leading to death of non-edited cells. Through cell killing with efficiencies of up to 99.999%, integration of antibiotic resistance markers became dispensable, enabling scarless and markerless edits with single-base precision. We used NT-CRISPR for deletions, integrations and single-base modifications with editing efficiencies of up to 100%. Further, we confirmed its applicability for simultaneous deletion of multiple chromosomal regions. Lastly, we showed that the near PAM-less Cas9 variant SpG Cas9 is compatible with NT-CRISPR and thereby broadens the target spectrum.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Vibrio natriegens is a fast-growing marine bacterium with a doubling time of <10 min1,2. It has become a promising chassis organism due to its interesting properties, such as a wide substrate range, lack of pathogenicity and a highly active translational machinery3,4,5,6. A crucial factor for the utility of an organism is the availability of efficient and reliable methods for genome engineering for both basic research and application-oriented projects. In case of the primary prokaryotic model organism Escherichia coli, large scale genome engineering projects have led to both fundamental physiological insights7,8 and to platform strains for biotechnological applications9,10. Examples for this are genome reduction projects7,8 or recoding of the E. coli genome by replacing all amber stop codons11. In addition to single strains with multiple modifications, a library of strains each carrying a deletion of a single non-essential gene, known as the Keio Collection12, has proven to be a highly valuable resource for basic research in E. coli. So far, such ambitious projects with V. natriegens are still distant prospects and require the establishment of genome engineering methods matching those available for E. coli in terms of efficiency and ease of use13,14,15.
In recent years, first steps have been made to turn V. natriegens into a genetically accessible model organism. Its genome, consisting of two chromosomes, was sequenced and published in 201316,17. Moreover, protocols for transformation with plasmids and first genome engineering methods have been developed by either taking inspiration from tools developed for E. coli5,18,19 or by harnessing organism-specific advantages of V. natriegens. The latter is the case for multiplex genome editing by natural transformation (MuGENT)20. Natural transformation describes the uptake of free DNA from the environment by a host-encoded multicomponent machinery, and sequential integration of this DNA into the genome by RecA mediated homologous recombination21. This capability is widespread among Vibrio species and many other phylogenetically unrelated bacteria22. Natural transformation was harnessed in the MuGENT method for genome engineering in V. natriegens by plasmid-based overproduction of the competence master regulator TfoX20. This way, the need to identify the natural inducer for natural transformation, which is chitin for Vibrio cholerae but unknown for V. natriegens, was circumvented20. While MuGENT showed a stunning efficiency with up to 10% of the cells carrying a deletion, this method relies on integration of an antibiotic resistance marker into a chromosomal locus for the selection of modified clones20. As a result, subsequent removal of the antibiotic resistance marker is required through additional laborious steps or the marker remains in the genome, thereby preventing future use of the respective antibiotic for selection.
A different strategy to efficiently discriminate between edited and non-edited cells has been developed in a wide range of organisms through the CRISPR-Cas9 system14,23,24. The endonuclease Cas9 is directed to a defined genomic locus through an easily adaptable guide RNA (gRNA), thus providing remarkable flexibility25. Cleavage through the Cas9/gRNA complex introduces a DNA double-strand break (DSB)26 which is lethal to most prokaryotic bacteria due to the absence of the non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) pathway27. If CRISPR-Cas9 is designed to target the wild type sequence, non-edited cells can be efficiently killed, while the edited cells are immune to Cas9 cleavage and survive. When performed after application of the editing method, CRISPR-Cas9-based counter selection can greatly increase the fraction of modified cells and hence the apparent editing efficiency14,23,24. Cell death of V. natriegens as a result of Cas9-mediated DNA cleavage has been confirmed recently, suggesting the absence of NHEJ28.
Here, we report the NT-CRISPR method combining the highly efficient genome editing through natural transformation with a CRISPR-Cas9-based counter selection strategy. We achieved editing efficiencies of up to 100% for deletions, integrations and point mutations, and demonstrated multiplexed deletions of three genomic target regions. The NT-CRISPR method obviates the integration of antibiotic resistance markers and thereby allows for scarless and markerless genome engineering in V. natriegens.
Results and discussion
Design of and rationale behind NT-CRISPR
For NT-CRISPR, we envisioned a one-plasmid design to achieve a convenient and fast workflow. One necessary component of the NT-CRISPR system is the master regulator for natural competence tfoX. Similar to a previous approach20, we use the tfoX gene from Vibrio cholerae under the control of the isopropyl ß-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) inducible Ptac promoter. In addition, our design requires the components of the CRISPR-Cas9 system, namely cas9 and gRNA, both driven by the anhydrotetracycline (ATc) inducible Ptet promoter (Fig. 1a). In our construct, we used improved variants of Ptac and Ptet29. We found that simultaneously maintaining the coding sequences for Cas9 and a gRNA targeting a genomic sequence to be a major challenge in V. natriegens. A possible reason was trace production of Cas9 and gRNA through leaky promoter activity which was probably sufficient to introduce DNA DSBs and consequently causes cell death. This problem persisted even when a weak ribosome binding site was used and the strongest available SsrA-derived protein degradation tag (M0050)30 was fused to Cas9 to reduce cellular abundance of this protein. Previously, it had been shown that by these two measures, the Cas9 and gRNA coding sequences could be established together in E. coli cells14. However, when V. natriegens cells were transformed with the plasmid carrying all CRISPR-Cas9 components, we obtained only very few colonies carrying a wide range of deleterious mutations in the plasmid, rendering the CRISPR-Cas9 system non-functional. In contrast, the same plasmid with a non-binding control gRNA could be easily introduced to this host.
The final solution to the strong toxicity of Cas9 and gRNA produced at basal levels was the expression of the anti-CRISPR protein-encoding gene acrIIA4 under control of the constitutive promoter J23106. AcrIIA4 shows a high affinity to Cas9 and the Cas9-gRNA complex, efficiently inhibiting Cas9-gRNA from binding to the DNA target and consequently preventing the introduction of DSB31,32. Anti-CRISPR proteins have been used in eukaryotes to reduce off-target effects33,34 or to achieve spatiotemporal control over CRISPR-Cas9 activity, for example through an optogenetic approach35 or by selective expression in certain cell types36. Moreover, anti-CRISPR proteins were used in the prokaryotic species Clostridium acetobutylicum to enable cells to carry cas9 and gRNA simultaneously without toxic effects37. In a similar fashion, we used constitutive expression of acrIIA4 to compensate for the basal production of Cas9 and gRNA. After adding acrIIA4 to our design, we were finally able to transform V. natriegens with a plasmid carrying both cas9 and a gene coding for a chromosome targeting gRNA. The full plasmid design is shown in Fig. 1a.
The first step after transformation of the NT-CRISPR plasmid (Fig. 1a) is the natural transformation, which requires the addition of IPTG to induce production of the master regulator TfoX. For a simple deletion, a transforming DNA (tDNA), with sequences homologous to the regions flanking the target sequence to be deleted, is added to the cells (Fig. 1b). Only a minority of cells in the population will be modified, while the vast majority of cells will still have the wild type sequence. The last step in the workflow is the CRISPR-Cas9 mediated counterselection (Fig. 1c). Therefore, ATc is added to induce expression of both cas9 and the gRNA gene to overcome the AcrIIA4 threshold causing DSB and cell death in cells with the wild type sequence. In contrast, modified cells are immune to CRISPR-Cas9 counterselection because the target sequence is no longer present in the genome (Fig. 1c). As a result, the counterselection step enriches successfully edited cells.
Inducible cell killing by CRISPR-Cas9
As described above, it is crucial for the NT-CRISPR method to tightly control CRISPR-Cas9 and induce cell death only upon induction. We reasoned that the ratio between acrIIA4 and cas9 expression strength is important. Expression of acrIIA4 that is too weak might not be sufficient to compensate for the leaky cas9 and gRNA gene expression, still leading to premature cell death. On the other hand, acrIIA4 expression that is too strong, could prevent efficient counterselection despite a full induction of the CRISPR-Cas9 system. To test a range of acrIIA4 and cas9 expression strengths, we created twelve plasmids representing the combinatorics of four different ribosome binding sites (RBS) for acrIIA4 with three distinct RBS for cas9. The RBS used differ in their expression strengths which were recently quantified in V. natriegens with fluorescent reporter experiments30. These variants were tested for their ability to trigger cell death upon addition of ATc as the inducer of Cas9 and gRNA production. We used a gRNA targeting the non-essential wbfF gene, which is involved in capsule polysaccharide biosynthesis38. Combinations of different RBS for cas9 and acrIIA4 were tested to identify translation rates and consequently a protein stoichiometry which leads to efficient inducible cell killing. As a simple experiment, we cultivated cells in microplates and continuously measured OD600 to track growth of the cultures. To induce expression of cas9 and the gRNA gene, ATc was added in a final concentration of 200 ng/mL to exponentially growing cells 1 h after the start of the batch cultivation. We observed a reduction in OD600, indicating cell death about 1.5 h after ATc-mediated induction of cas9 and the gRNA gene with ATc for all strains carrying plasmids using the moderately strong RBS B003230 for acrIIA4 (Supplementary Fig. S1a). While the choice of the RBS for acrIIA4 and consequently its expression strength, apparently has a strong impact on the inducibility of the CRISPR-Cas9 system, we found no difference between the three tested RBS for cas9, neither in this growth experiment in liquid culture (Supplementary Fig. S1a) nor in a separate agar plate-based assay which yielded counterselection efficiencies similar to those obtained applying the actual NT-CRISPR editing workflow (Supplementary Fig. S1b). Of the three variants that showed inducible cell killing in the growth experiment, we proceeded with plasmid pST_116, which carries the strongest of the three tested RBS for cas9 B003330.
Dependence of gene deletion efficiencies on tDNA amount and homologous sequence length
We chose wbfF as a first target to demonstrate gene deletion by our NT-CRISPR-based approach in V. natriegens since deletion mutants of this gene show an almost transparent colony morphology20. This phenotype allows for distinction between wild type and wbfF mutant colonies to conveniently calculate gene deletion efficiencies. We reproduced this phenotype by our approach using tDNA comprising 3 kb homologous sequences flanking the designed deletion of the wbfF coding sequence (1734 bp) (Fig. 2a). Subsequently, we characterized the genome editing efficiency dependent on the amount of tDNA supplied (1 ng, 10 ng or 100 ng) and on the induction state of the CRISPR-Cas9 system (Fig. 2b). We obtained almost 100% of all colonies with the transparent ∆wbfF morphology for all three DNA amounts tested when CRISPR-Cas9 was induced. This suggests a remarkably high editing efficiency of NT-CRISPR, even when just 1 ng of tDNA was used. However, in absence of counterselection we observed a decrease in the fraction of positive colonies with decreasing tDNA amounts (Fig. 2b). This is in accordance with a previous study describing natural transformation for genome engineering in V. natriegens20. This trend also became apparent through the absolute number of positive colonies (CFU/µL) which decreased with lower amounts of tDNA for both the induced and uninduced samples (Supplementary Fig. S2a, b). With 100 ng of added tDNA and without counterselection, we still obtained ~20% of positive colonies (Fig. 2b), further supporting the potential of natural transformation for genome engineering in V. natriegens.
In a second experiment, we investigated the impact of different lengths of the homologous sequences of the tDNA on the success of genome editing with NT-CRISPR (Fig. 2c). When CRISPR-Cas9 was induced, we again obtained high editing efficiencies of at least 90% for all tested fragment lengths, with exception of the samples with 50 bp homologous flanks. More than 98% editing efficiency was achieved for 3000 bp and 1000 bp homologous flanks. However, a dependency of the efficiency of natural transformation on the length of the tDNAs is suggested by the fact that a lower absolute number of colonies with ∆wbfF mutant morphology (given as CFU/µL) was obtained for tDNAs with shortened homologous flanks. This was observed both with and without CRISPR-Cas9-based counterselection (Supplementary Fig. S2c, d). Decreases in putative ∆wbfF CFU/µl by ~40 fold and ~4 fold were observed when reducing the flanks from 3000 to 1000 bp and 1000 to 500 bp, respectively (Supplementary Fig. S2c). Further shortening the flanks down to 100 bp did not result in considerable additional drops in the number of putative ∆wbfF colonies (given as CFU/µl) (Supplementary Fig. S2c). Note that a decreasing length of tDNAs correlates with an increasing number of molecules for 100 ng mass of tDNA. An almost constant number of colonies obtained for fragments with homologous flanks of 500 bp, 200 bp and 100 bp suggests that a possible reduction in uptake or recombination efficiency of shorter fragments is partly compensated by a higher concentration of tDNA molecules. Another result with potential practical implications is the high editing efficiency of ~90% obtained by NT-CRISPR with an asymmetric tDNA fragment with 3000 bp and 50 bp homologous sequence surrounding the deletion (Fig. 2c). This fragment can be easily generated in one PCR by adding the short 50 bp arm as an overhang to one of the PCR primers used to amplify the long arm. Applying such an asymmetric DNA fragment for natural transformation-mediated locus exchange by homologous recombination was successfully established for V. cholerae, but required the deletion of at least two ssDNA exonucleases to achieve reasonable editing efficiencies20. If deletion of the orthologous ssDNA exonucleases in V. natriegens could even further increase the editing efficiency with short tDNA fragments remains unknown. Nonetheless, due to the highly efficient counterselection, asymmetrical tDNA fragments with one short arm might represent a convenient approach to introduce single gene deletions.
Collectively, the initial characterizations suggest that combining natural transformation with efficient, targeted CRISPR-Cas9-mediated counterselection considerably increases genome editing frequencies in V. natriegens. Moreover, even low amounts of tDNA like 1 ng and homologous flanks as short as 100 bp are sufficient to produce more than 90% correct colonies.
NT-CRISPR proof-of-concept for generating deletions of different lengths, point mutations and integrations in a set of target genes
Inspired by these promising results, we sought to apply CRISPR-NT for various types of genome edits and to expand the set of chromosomal target sequences for our proof-of-concept study in V. natriegens. We assembled NT-CRISPR plasmids with 15 different gRNAs targeting a range of different sequences, both on chromosome 1 and 2. The reason behind selecting these genes is described below. In order to quantify the “killing efficiency” of the respective gRNAs, we performed the NT-CRISPR protocol without addition of tDNA. Samples were either induced with ATc to induce CRISPR-Cas9-based counterselection or remained uninduced. The ratios of the resulting CFU/µL allows for calculation of killing efficiency in the NT-CRISPR workflow. The shown gRNAs resulted in killing efficiencies within a narrow range between 99.999% (malQ) and 99.964% (vnp1) (Fig. 2d). The value of the strongest tested gRNA that targeted malQ translates to the survival of just one out of 100,000 cells. A non-targeting gRNA was included as a control and resulted in a slight reduction of cells upon Cas9 and gRNA induction, possibly due to unspecific toxicity or protein production burden. An empty plasmid control ruled out negative effects of the inducer ATc at the applied concentration.
In the NT-CRISPR method, editing through natural transformation and CRISPR-Cas9-based counterselection occur in two temporally distinct steps. Consequently, with knowledge of the killing efficiency, it is possible to calculate the apparent editing efficiency from the initial editing efficiency before counterselection. The apparent editing efficiency is defined as the fraction of positive cells after counterselection. With a highly efficient gRNA even an initial editing efficiency of just 10−6 (one edited cell out of one million) was computed to result in 10−1 or 10% of all remaining cells being correct after counterselection (Fig. 2e). With the weakest shown gRNA, an initial editing efficiency of 10−3 (0.1%), which is far below the values obtained for simple deletions without counterselection (Fig. 2b), was calculated to be sufficient for achieving apparent editing efficiencies of almost 100% through robust counterselection. Different gRNAs for the same gene should not influence the initial natural transformation-dependent editing step but might yield different counterselection efficiencies. Since we observed a very narrow range of killing efficiencies for the different gRNAs shown (Fig. 2d), we do not expect screening of gRNAs for enrichment of certain genetic modifications to be necessary, as long as the used gRNA is in principle functional and yields a killing efficiency approximately within the reported range.
Deletions
To demonstrate the applicability of NT-CRISPR for deletions, we selected single genes and groups of genes as targets whose loss might lead to an increased plasmid transformation efficiency. So far, the tremendous potential of V. natriegens as a fast-growing strain for the selection and propagation of in vitro assembled plasmids is still hampered due to transformation efficiencies that are much lower than the ones observed for highly engineered E. coli strains30. We targeted the two prophage regions vnp1 and vnp2, as their removal leads to increased survival under osmotic stress conditions39 which might be experienced by the cells during preparation of chemically competent cells. In addition, we chose galE, encoding an enzyme which provides precursors for the synthesis of lipopolysaccharides, because an increased plasmid transformation efficiency was reported for galE mutants of some Gram-negative bacteria, presumably due to the loss of cell surface structures which might impair plasmid uptake40,41. Along the same line, we reasoned that removal of other surface structures, namely the flagella and pili, could also contribute to increased transformation efficiency. Lastly, we included the gene coding for the extracellular nuclease Xds42, which could degrade the incoming plasmid DNA similarly to the Dns nuclease. Deletion of dns was already confirmed to drastically increase the plasmid transformation efficiency of chemically competent cells5,30.
The target sequences for deletion described above span a wide range in size from 1.0 kb (galE) up to the prophage region of vnp2 with 39 kb and are located on either chromosome 1 or chromosome 2 (Fig. 3a). To quantify the editing efficiency of each of these deletions, we analyzed 50 colonies by colony PCR. For all targets, except for the two prophage regions, all screened colonies were correct including the deletion of a flagellar gene cluster of 31 kb. Also, the prophage regions were deleted with 47 and 49 colonies out of 50 being correct, a remarkably high efficiency considering the size of 36 kb and 39 kb, respectively (Fig. 3b). We sequenced the target regions for four colonies per target and found the desired sequence in all clones, with a single exception. In case of vnp1, one clone missed four bp directly adjacent to the deleted sequence (Supplementary Fig. S3a). It was shown previously that the prophages are activated spontaneously at low frequencies39. It is tempting to speculate that this deviation from the desired sequence is the result of a spontaneous loss of the prophage region, which would still confer resistance to the CRISPR-based counterselection, rather than the targeted deletion by natural transformation.
As described above, the targets for deletion were selected because we hoped that their deletion would improve plasmid transformation efficiency of V. natriegens. We tested all single deletions but did not see any significant increase in transformation efficiency (Supplementary Fig. S4).
One feature of CRISPR-based systems is its inherent modularity. Simultaneous targeting of multiple sequences is possible by simply including multiple gRNAs (Fig. 3c). Assembly of a plasmid harboring all required components to target three different loci is achieved by firstly constructing the gRNA expression cassette and secondly by integrating them into a plasmid already carrying all remaining components (Supplementary Fig. S5a). We tested this approach by simultaneously deleting three of the genomic regions which could be efficiently removed individually. We obtained striking results for the simultaneous deletion of the pili operon, xds and galE, with 24 out of 50 tested colonies carrying all three deletions (Fig. 3d). As an even bigger challenge, we successfully deleted the flagellar gene cluster and both prophage regions simultaneously in two out of 50 colonies (Fig. 3e). The deleted regions sum up to 106 kb, equaling ~2% of the V. natriegens genome. We obtained these results using just 10 ng of each tDNA. For the simultaneous deletion of the pili operon, xds and galE, increasing the amount of tDNA to 100 ng for each target resulted in 44 out of 50 colonies (88%) carrying all three deletions (Supplementary Fig. S6). The killing efficiency with three gRNAs was found to be similar or slightly higher than that with the individual gRNAs (Supplementary Fig. S7), suggesting that undesired recombination events within the sequences identical in all gRNA expression cassettes (Ptet and gRNA scaffold) did not occur at perturbing frequencies. The current design allows construction of NT-CRISPR plasmids with two to five gRNAs (Supplementary Fig. S5b), even though we note that successful deletion of more than three loci was not demonstrated within the scope of this study.
Point mutations
In addition to deletions, we tested NT-CRISPR for the introduction of point mutations. The three genes, malQ, araA and glpK, involved in catabolism of the alternative carbon sources maltose, arabinose and glycerol, respectively, were chosen as proof-of-concept targets for the introduction of point mutations. The introduction of a premature stop codon by a single point mutation can be easily identified because this prevents V. natriegens from growing on minimal medium with the respective carbon source. In case of malQ, we randomly selected 50 colonies yielded by the NT-CRISPR approach and tested them for their ability to grow on M9 minimal medium with maltose as the sole carbon source. None of the tested colonies could grow indicating successful genome modification (Fig. 4a). Subsequently, the target sequence of four colonies was sequenced and the introduction of the desired point mutation was confirmed for all tested colonies. In case of araA and glpK, a first attempt to introduce a point mutation was not successful and resulted in very few colonies, none of them carrying the desired edit (Supplementary Fig. S8a, b). High editing efficiency of 100%, based on the inability of cells from the tested colony to grow on minimal medium with the respective carbon source, could be achieved by introducing a second silent point mutation, leading to a C–C mismatch (G>C mutation) (Fig. 4a). It was shown previously that V. natriegens has an active methyl-directed mismatch repair (MMR) pathway, preventing the efficient introduction of point mutations by natural transformation20. It is known that C–C mismatches inhibit MMR in a wide range of other organisms43,44,45.Our data suggest that this is also the case in V. natriegens. The approach to introduce a C–C mismatch in addition to the desired mutation can serve as a convenient solution when MMR hinders successful introduction of certain point mutations. Again, we confirmed the point mutations as well as the additional C–C mismatch by sequencing the target regions of glpK and araA (Supplementary Fig. S3b, c).
Integrations
Lastly, we wanted to test if NT-CRISPR is also applicable for integrations into the genome. The approach presented here could be a powerful tool to fuse fluorescent reporter genes to any gene of interest to study their expression or the localization of their gene product. We selected genes that are expected to differ in expression during different growth phases in a batch culture to follow their expression dynamics by measuring the reporter signal. We fused the coding region of the red fluorescent protein mScarlet-I46 to the 3′ end of four genes which are known to be differentially regulated during transition into and in the stationary phase of E. coli. As candidates for genes with high expression level in the exponential growth phase, we chose two ribosomal protein-encoding genes. We picked rpsB and rplS because fusion of fluorescent reporter proteins to the respective ribosomal proteins was possible in E. coli without noticeable detrimental effects on growth or ribosome assembly47. We chose hisG, involved in histidine biosynthesis48, and rpoS, encoding the stress sigma factor σ38 49, as candidates for genes upregulated in stationary phase. A control strain was generated by first creating an mScarlet-I transcription unit with a strong constitutive promoter (J23111) and a strong RBS (B0030). Then this construct was integrated into an intergenic region with neighboring genes in convergent orientation (int9).
Counterselection for successful integration can be performed through a gRNA, which overlaps the integration site so that successful modification disrupts the gRNA binding sequence and thereby confers resistance against CRISPR-based counterselection. In case of rpoS and rplS, no suitable PAM sequence was available at the desired integration site. As a workaround, we introduced a silent point mutation 300 bp from the integration site. This point mutation was used for the counterselection, expecting the integration of mScarlet-I when the silent point mutation was present. For each integration, 50 randomly selected colonies were screened by colony PCR. When a gRNA was available for direct counterselection at the integration site, we reliably obtained high editing efficiencies with almost all tested colonies being correct (Fig. 4b). In contrast, for rpoS and rplS, editing efficiencies were drastically lower with just 25 and four out of 50 colonies carrying the desired mScarlet-I integration, respectively. Sequencing DNA from four colonies each, which were negative in the PCR screening, revealed that all clones carried the selected silent point mutation, suggesting that not the full-length tDNA fragment was incorporated through homologous recombination. It remains to be investigated if introduction of the silent point mutation closer to the actual integration site than the 300 bp tested here, might lead to a higher editing efficiency. We additionally note that the size of the integrated sequence is relatively short with ~700 bp and ~1300 bp for the translational fusions with mScarlet-I and the integration of the constitutive expression cassette, respectively. Within the scope of this project, we did not evaluate if larger sequences, e.g., sequences encoding full metabolic pathways, can be integrated with similar efficiencies. The generated constructs were tested for their growth behavior and mScarlet-I signal. No growth difference was observed between all tested strains (Fig. 4c). This is also the case for the two strains carrying mScarlet-I fusions to the essential ribosomal genes rpsB and rplS28, which is in accordance with similar experiments in E. coli47. The mScarlet-I signal of the tested strains showed the expected growth phase dependency. The rpsB-mScarlet-I and rplS-mScarlet-I strains displayed almost identical courses of fluorescent signal, suggesting a very similar regulation of both ribosomal protein genes. Both strains showed a steady increase in reporter-mediated fluorescence signal in the time window between 2 and 6 h, before reaching a plateau. In contrast, the rpoS-mScarlet-I strain showed an increasing signal after 4 h with an even steeper rise after 6 h. A constant increase from the onset of the stationary phase (~2 h) and throughout the stationary phase was observed for the strain carrying the constitutively expressed mScarlet-I cassette (Fig. 4d). The data are shown as relative mScarlet-I/OD600 to account for strong differences in the absolute signal strength (Supplementary Fig. S9). Unfortunately, the signal mediated by hisG-mScarlet-I was hardly measurable and did not allow for quantitative characterization (Supplementary Fig. S10a, b). The results presented here serve as an example of how NT-CRISPR can be used for the construction of reporter strains to study the regulation of important physiological processes.
Overcoming PAM dependency with engineered Cas9
The use of Cas9 is limited by the availability of the PAM sequence, NGG (N = any nucleotide) in case of the commonly used Cas9 from Streptococcus pyogenes. While there are always plenty of possible gRNAs available for larger deletions, introduction of specific point mutations or genomic integrations into a desired locus might be restricted when no PAM can be found nearby, thus requiring inefficient workaround solutions (see generation of rpoS-mScarlet-I and rplS-mScarlet-I above). In recent years, substantial progress has been made in developing new Cas9 variants with a wider PAM spectrum50,51,52. We tested the near-PAMless Cas9 variant SpG Cas951 with the PAM requirement being NGN. In theory, each G and C nucleotide in the genome can serve as a PAM, thereby largely expanding the number of available gRNAs.
We introduced the described mutations into the cas9 sequence in the NT-CRISPR plasmid and tested it with gRNAs targeting wbfF with all possible PAM doublet pairs (NGG, NGA, NGC and NGT). The wbfF gRNA with a NGG PAM showed similar killing efficiencies when used with Cas9 and SpG Cas9, confirming the general compatibility of SpG Cas9 with NT-CRISPR. The tested gRNAs with alternative PAM sequences showed a wide range of killing efficiencies from 99.993% (NGT) and no significant effect for (NGC) (Fig. 5a). We note that other determinants, apart from the PAM sequence, can influence the killing efficiency and the limited number of tested gRNAs does not allow for formulation of general claims about the applicability of SpG Cas9 with alternative PAMs in the framework of NT-CRISPR in V. natriegens. However, it appears as if the killing efficiencies were far lower than the obtained values for the many gRNAs tested before with NGG PAMs in our study (cf. Figure 2d), except for the tested gRNA using NGT as a PAM. Based on the high killing efficiency which we observed with a gRNA using NGT as a PAM, we designed two additional gRNAs overlapping the 3′ end of rpoS and rplS and also measured high killing efficiencies for these (Fig. 5a). Thereafter, we used SpG Cas9 together with these two gRNAs for the integration of mScarlet-I at the 3′ end of rpoS and rplS. For 50 randomly selected colonies, successful mScarlet-I integration was confirmed for 44 and 50 colonies for rpoS and rplS, respectively, compared to 25 and 4 for the indirect approach described above (Fig. 5b). In conclusion, the killing efficiency with SpG Cas9 and alternative PAM sequences tends to be lower than Cas9 with NGG PAMs. Nevertheless, our results suggest that applying SpG Cas9 together with gRNAs using NGT as a PAM could be a suitable strategy for the integration of sequences when no gRNA with NGG is available at the desired target sequence.
Conclusion
In this study, we developed NT-CRISPR which builds on the previous application of natural transformation for genome engineering in V. natriegens20 by adding a CRISPR-Cas9-based counterselection step. With killing efficiencies of up to 99.999%, most genomic modifications, including deletions, integrations and point mutations, can be performed with almost 100% efficiency. As one highlight, we demonstrate the simultaneous deletion of multiple genes through the expression of multiple gRNAs directed against different target sequences. The NT-CRISPR workflow can be performed in a standard working day. The full process, including preparation of tDNAs and cloning of gRNAs as well as curing of the NT-CRISPR plasmid after successful genome modification, can be achieved in one week (Fig. 6a). The efficiency of plasmid curing is extremely high with an average of ~95% of colonies consisting of cells which have lost the NT-CRISPR plasmid after plating the culture from a single cultivation step in antibiotic free medium (Fig. 6b). Edits with this method can be performed with single-base precision, without the — transient or permanent — integration of antibiotic resistance markers, and do not leave any undesired scars in the genome. The major limitation of this method is its PAM dependency which might restrict access to some sequences for modifications. We present two approaches to close this gap by either introducing a silent, selectable point mutations or by using SpG Cas951 with alternative PAM sequences.
We are confident that this method will provide the growing V. natriegens community with a convenient and highly efficient genome engineering tool. It sets the foundation for sophisticated strain engineering projects to exploit the fascinating properties of V. natriegens for academic and industrial applications in the future.
Furthermore, natural transformation is a commonly used strategy for genome engineering in a wide range of biotechnologically and clinically relevant bacteria, e.g., Bacillus subtilis53, Vibrio cholerae54, Vibrio fischeri55, Streptococcus thermophiles56, and Streptococcus mutans57. The NT-CRISPR method described here for V. natriegens could serve as a blueprint to upgrade existing natural transformation approaches with CRISPR-Cas9-based counterselection to accelerate research in these important organisms.
Methods
Bacterial strains and culture conditions
The V. natriegens strain used for this study is a derivative of ATCC14048 with deletion of the dns gene, constructed in a previous project for increased plasmid transformation efficiency30. V. natriegens was routinely grown in LBv25 medium with added chloramphenicol if appropriate. Chloramphenicol was added with a final concentration of 4 µg/mL for liquid and 2 µg/mL for solid medium.
Strains were prepared for long term storage at −80 °C by growing cultures for 6–8 h at 37 °C and mixing 700 µL of grown cultures with 700 µL of 50% glycerol. We found that the additional washing step reported previously19,30 is not required when cultures are not grown into deep stationary phase (e.g., overnight at 37 °C).
Preparation of chemically competent V. natriegens cells and heat-shock transformation
Preparation of chemically competent cells and heat-shock transformation was performed as described before30. A preculture of V. natriegens ATCC14048 Δdns was inoculated from a glycerol stock and grown overnight at 37 °C and 220 rpm. At the next day 125 mL of preheated LBv2 medium (37 °C) was inoculated with the overnight culture to a final OD600 of 0.01 in a 1 L baffled shake flask. This culture was grown at 200 rpm (37 °C) until an OD600 between 0.5 and 0.7 was reached. The culture was then transferred to pre-cooled 50 mL falcon tubes and incubated on ice for 10 min, followed by centrifugation for 10 min at 3000 × g at 4 °C. The supernatant was discarded, and the pellets were resuspended in 40 mL cold TB buffer per 125 mL bacterial culture (TB buffer: 10 mM Pipes, 15 mM CaCl2, 250 mM KCl, pH adjusted to 6.7 with KOH, then add 55 mM MnCl2, filter sterilized). The cells were again incubated on ice for 10 min and further centrifuged for 10 min at 3000 × g at 4 °C. The supernatant was removed and pellets were resuspended in 5 mL cold TB buffer per 125 mL starting culture and consolidated in a single falcon tube, before adding 350 µL dimethyl sulfoxide. After another 10 min incubation on ice, 50 µL aliquots were prepared in 1.5 mL tubes and snap frozen in liquid nitrogen. Aliquots were stored at −80 °C until further use.
Chemically competent V. natriegens ATCC14048 Δdns cells were transformed by adding DNA to an aliquot of competent cells and incubated on ice for 30 min. After 30 min, cells were heat shocked in a water bath at 42 °C for 45 s then immediately incubated on ice for 10 min before recovery. The cells were recovered in 1 mL warm LBv2 medium, shaking at 37 °C for 1 h at 700 rpm. After recovery, the cells were pelleted by centrifugation at 3000 × g for 1 min, the supernatant was decanted and the pellet was resuspended in the remaining ~50 µL residual medium. The whole volume was plated on 37 °C warm LBv2 plates containing the appropriate antibiotic and incubated overnight at 37 °C.
Construction of NT-CRISPR plasmids
Plasmids were constructed within the framework of the Marburg Collection, a recently published Golden Gate-based cloning toolbox for V. natriegens30. Part sequences and detailed description of plasmid assembly are provided in Supplementary Data and Supplementary Table 1, respectively. Assembly of the plasmids was performed in E. coli NEB Turbo, with the exception of the exchange of gRNA spacer sequences, as the resulting plasmids are intended for experiments in V. natriegens. Adaptation for different target sequences was achieved by replacing a sfGFP dropout fragment with the gRNA spacer sequence by annealing two complementary oligonucleotides. If not indicated otherwise, pST_116 was used for plasmids carrying single gRNAs with Cas9 and pST_140 whenever spG Cas9 was used. Annealing reaction was set up by mixing 1.5 µL of each oligonucleotide (100 µM) with 5 µL T4-DNA ligase buffer (Thermo Scientific) in a total reaction volume of 50 µL. Reactions are incubated in a heat block at 95 °C for 15 min, before switching off the heat block for slowly cooling down the samples to room temperature (~1 h). Cloning reaction with the NT-CRISPR plasmids was set up with ~200 ng of the respective plasmid, 3 µL annealed oligonucleotides, 0.5 µL of T4-DNA Ligase (5 Weiss U/µL, Thermo Scientific) and BsaI (10 U/µL) and 1 µL T4-DNA ligase buffer in a total reaction volume of 10 µL. Reactions were run in a thermocycler with 30 cycles of 37 °C (2 min) and 16 °C (5 min), followed by a final digestion step at 37 °C for 30 min and an enzyme denaturation step at 80 °C for 10 min. Transformation of V. natriegens was performed with 5 µL of the cloning reactions by heat-shock transformation. Sequences of oligonucleotides are provided in Supplementary Data. Two colonies from each transformation plate were used as biological replicates in each experiment. In case of NT-CRISPR plasmids carrying multiple gRNA sequences, each gRNA expression cassette was first constructed individually on plasmids carrying a kanamycin resistance marker. A range of these plasmids is available representing the available positions in a level 2 plasmid in the framework of the Marburg Collection30. For this, the oligonucleotides for the respective spacers were annealed and the cloning reaction was set up as described for the NT-CRISPR plasmid above with the difference that ~70 ng of plasmid DNA was used. In a second step, those gRNA cassettes were integrated into plasmid pST_119, carrying all remaining components in a Golden Gate reaction performed as described above but with Esp3I (10,000 U/mL, NEB) instead of BsaI. The assembly of NT-CRISPR plasmids with multiple gRNAs is visualized in Supplementary Fig. S5a and b. The assembly of the separate gRNA expression cassettes as well as the multi gRNA NT-CRISPR plasmid were performed using E. coli as a chassis: The sequence was confirmed by Sanger sequencing and the plasmids were finally introduced into V. natriegens by heat-shock transformation.
Selection of gRNAs
gRNAs for NT-CRISPR were mostly designed using the in-built feature “Find CRISPR sites” in Geneious Prime (Version 2021.2.1.), which uses the algorithm described by Doench et al. 201458. Of the predicted gRNAs, the ones with a high predicted activity score were selected. gRNAs for three targets, namely flrB (flagella), pilA (pili) and xds, were initially designed for CRISPR interference applications, using the algorithm described by Calvo-Vallmañán et al. 202059. Those gRNAs yielded similar results in terms of killing efficiency (Fig. 2d) and editing efficiency (Fig. 3b) compared to gRNAs designed using Geneious Prime. This suggests that sufficiently efficient gRNAs for NT-CRISPR can be obtained through different algorithms. We note that two out of 17 gRNAs tested within the scope of this work did not appear to lead to CRISPR-based counterselection (Sequences for two rhaA targeting gRNAs in Supplementary Data).
Preparation of tDNAs
The tDNAs used for the natural transformation were prepared by first assembling a tDNA template plasmid using Gibson Assembly60 and then use this plasmid in a PCR to generate the tDNA fragments. All tDNA template plasmids were generated with 3 kb homologous sequences. The part entry vector of the Marburg Collection, pMC_V_01 was used as a vector for most tDNA template plasmids. In some cases, we observed a strong toxicity of the cloned sequences and used the plasmid pMC_V_11, a low-to-medium copy derivative of pMC_V_01 with p15A instead of ColE1 as the origin of replication. All primer sequences used for assembly of the tDNA template plasmids and the subsequent PCR reactions are provided in Supplementary Data. The template was eliminated after the PCR reactions by addition of 1 µL DpnI (10,000 U/mL, NEB) to 25 µL PCR reactions and incubation at 37 °C for at least 1 h. Lastly, a PCR cleanup was performed with the E.Z.N.A Cycle Pure Kit (Omega Bio-Tex), according to manufacturer’s instructions.
Natural Transformation with CRISPR-Cas9 counterselection (NT-CRISPR workflow)
Natural transformation was performed largely as described previously for V. natriegens20 with the addition of an additional step for CRISPR-Cas9 mediated counterselection. Precultures were grown overnight (16–17 h) at 30 °C and 200 rpm in 5 mL LBv2 with 4 µg/mL chloramphenicol and 100 µM IPTG (Roth, CAS: 367-93-1) to induce tfoX expression. The natural transformation was started by adding 3.5 µL of the precultures (OD600 ~9–11) to 350 µL sea salt medium (28 g/L (Sigma, S9883)) with 100 µM IPTG in a 1.5 mL reaction tube. Unless indicated otherwise, 10 ng of tDNA with 3 kb homologous flanks was added. Samples were briefly vortexed and then incubated statically at 30 °C for 5 h. In a subsequent step, 1 mL LBv2 without antibiotics was added to the cells. For CRISPR-Cas9 induction, 200 ng/mL ATc (Alfa Aeser, 13803-65-1) was added to the LBv2 medium. Tubes were mixed by inversion and incubated at 300 rpm and 30 °C for 1 h. 100 µL of appropriate dilutions (e.g., 10−3 for single deletions or 10−4 for uninduced controls) were plated on LBv2 agar plates with 2 µg/mL chloramphenicol. For CRISPR-Cas9 induction, 200 ng/mL ATc was added to the agar plates. For experiments without CRISPR-Cas9 induction, ATc was omitted from both the liquid medium and the agar plates. All experiments were performed with two biological replicates obtained from transformation of the gRNA cloning reaction in V. natriegens or the re-transformation of the multi-gRNA NT-CRISPR plasmid, previously assembled using E. coli.
Quantification of killing efficiencies in the NT-CRISPR workflow
Samples for assessing killing efficiencies were prepared as described above for the NT-CRISPR workflow but without addition of tDNAs. For each strain, two 1.5 mL reaction tubes were run in parallel, with and without CRISPR-Cas9 counterselection. To one tube, 200 ng/mL ATc was added to the LBv2 medium and for the preparation of LBv2 agar plates and the second tube was run in parallel without any ATc. The ratio between the obtained CFU/µL from these two samples was used to calculate the killing efficiency.
Verification of edits after NT-CRISPR
The approach used for the verification of colonies after NT-CRISPR differed between mutation types. For the quantitative characterization of NT-CRISPR (Fig. 2b, c) with wbfF as the target, colonies with different morphologies were counted and used to calculate editing efficiencies. For all other targets, we tested 25 colonies from each biological replicate, resulting in 50 analyzed colonies. All deletions, apart from wbfF, were verified by PCR with one primer slightly outside of the homologous flank and the other primer binding at the junction of the deletion, bridging the gap between the upstream and downstream sequence flanking the deleted region. Integrations were screened using one primer outside of the homologous flanks and a second primer binding inside the mScarlet-I sequence. For increased throughput, PCRs were performed in 96-well plates. For this, colonies were used to inoculate 100 µL LBv2 in 96-well round bottom plates and incubated at 1000 rpm in a 96-well plate shaker for 5–6 h to obtain densely grown cultures. Cells were harvested by centrifugation at 3000 × g for 10 min. Medium was aspirated and cell pellets were resuspended in 100 µL water. Cell lysis was achieved by floating the 96-well plate on a 95 °C water bath for 15 min. Lastly, 96-well plates were centrifuged again at 3000 × g for 10 min and 1 µL of the supernatant was used in 12.5 µL PCR reactions with Taq polymerase (NEB) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Point mutations were confirmed phenotypically by streaking the obtained colonies on M9 minimal medium agar plates with either glucose or the alternative carbon source. Colonies resulting in growth on M9 agar plates with glucose but not on plates with the respective secondary carbon source were considered as successfully edited. M9 agar plates were prepared (for 100 mL) by autoclaving H20 (35.7 mL) together with 1.5 g agarose. Subsequently all remaining components were prewarmed to 60 °C and added to the autoclaved components as follows: 50 mL 2 x M9 salts (Na2HOP4 (17 g/L), KH2PO4 (6 g/L), NaCl (1 g/L), NH4Cl (2 g/L), sterile filtered), 10 mL NaCl (20 %), 4 mL carbon source (10 %), 200 µL MgSO4 (1 M), 100 µL (CaCl2). For all mutations, PCR results and phenotypic characterizations were confirmed by Sanger sequencing. Four colonies were used for each deletion, integration or point mutation. Sequencing was performed through Microsynth Seqlab using PCR fragments and a primer binding ~500 bp upstream of the respective modification. Primers used for PCR verification and sequencing are provided in Supplementary Data.
Plasmid curing
After verification of the modifications, the NT-CRISPR plasmid was cured. For this, colonies yielded by the NT-CRISPR method were used to inoculate 5 mL of antibiotic free LBv2 and grown at 37 °C for 6–7 h. To obtain single colonies, we plated 100 µL of a 10−7 dilution, prepared in LBV2, on antibiotic free LBv2 agar plates. After overnight incubation at 37 °C, colonies were patched on LBv2 with and without 2 µg/mL chloramphenicol to check for plasmid loss. Colonies growing on the antibiotic free agar plates but not on agar plates containing chloramphenicol were considered to consist of plasmid-cured cells. Glycerol stocks of plasmid-cured strains were prepared as described above.
Quantification of mScarlet-I signal of V. natriegens reporter strains
Quantitative reporter experiments were performed largely as described before for the characterization of genetic parts30. Fist, material from glycerol stocks was resuspended in 50 µL LBv2 and 5 µL of the resulting suspension was used to inoculate 95 µL of LBv2 in a flat bottom 96-well plate. Cells were incubated as precultures for 5.5–6 h (equaling an overnight culture in similar workflows for E. coli) and then diluted 1:100 in fresh LBv2 to start the experiment in a Biotek Synergy H1 micro plate reader. Measurements were taken in 6 min intervals with a 3 min shaking step in double orbital mode and maximum speed occurring between measurements. The OD600 was measured in “normal” mode with eight measurements per data point and 100 ms delay after plate movement. mScarlet-I fluorescence was measured with a focal height of 6.5 mm, excitation and emission wavelength of 579 nm and 616 nm, respectively, and a gain of 90. Strains were used after curing of the NT-CRISPR plasmid. Sample data were first corrected by subtracting the mean of four blank wells (LBv2 medium) from the sample measurements. Growth curves were computationally synchronized by aligning the first data point of each well with OD600 > 0.015 and the mean of the OD600 values of the aligned growth curves of all tested replicates and independent experiments was plotted. The relative mScarlet-I/OD600 values were obtained by dividing all mScarlet-I/OD600 values by the value of the respective sample at timepoint 8 h, to compensate for different absolute mScarlet-I signals.
Testing inducible cell killing in liquid medium in a micro plate reader
Material from glycerol stocks was first resuspended in 50 µL LBv2 with chloramphenicol (4 µg/mL). Subsequently, 95 µL of medium in a 96-well plate was inoculated with 5 µL from the resuspended glycerol stock material. This plate was incubated for 5–6 h at 37 °C. To begin the experiment, the precultures were diluted 1:1000 in fresh LBv2 medium with chloramphenicol with a final volume of 100 μL per well. ATc was added to a final concentration of 200 ng/mL after 1 h of cultivation and the measurement was resumed. Experiments were performed in a Biotek Synergy H1 micro plate reader as described above but without measurement of fluorescence. Sample data were corrected by subtracting the mean of four blank wells (LBv2 medium) from the sample measurements.
Statistics and reproducibility
Biological replicates represent different levels within the NT-CRISPR workflow. Biological replicates of the 1st level represent independent colonies obtained after transformation of the NT-CRISPR plasmid and biological replicates of the 2nd level represents colonies obtained after successful genome modification with NT-CRISPR. Two 1st level replicates were used to characterize parameters of the NT-CRISPR method, namely editing efficiencies with different DNA amounts or fragment lengths as well as to characterize killing efficiencies in liquid cultures and within the editing workflow. These experiments were repeated twice on different days to ensure biological and experimental reproducibility. Proof-of-concept experiments for deletions, point mutations and integrations were performed with two 1st level biological replicates and 25 colonies (2nd level) were screened for each replicate, resulting in a total of 50 tested colonies. Phenotypic characterization of strains with integration of mScarlet-I (translational fusion and constitutively expressed transcription unit) was performed with two colonies (2nd level) from each biological replicate of NT-CRISPR plasmid transformation (1st level), resulting in a total of four biological replicates. This experiment was repeated twice on different days to ensure biological and experimental reproducibility. Plasmid curing was quantified with five colonies after wbfF deletion (2nd level) from each biological replicate of NT-CRISPR plasmid transformation (1st level). This experiment was repeated twice on different days to ensure biological and experimental reproducibility.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Data availability
Genetic part sequences and descriptions of plasmid assemblies are provided in Supplementary Data and Supplementary Table 1, respectively. Sequences of all oligonucleotides used in this study are provided in Supplementary Data. All data used to generate the figures shown in this publication are provided as Supplementary Data. Additional source data are deposited in the figshare repository (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.17297132.v3). Plasmid maps of NT-CRISPR plasmids and plasmids carrying the separate gRNA expression cassettes for assembly of multi-gRNA NT-CRISPR plasmids are available as Supplementary Data. Plasmids were submitted to Addgene (plasmid IDs 179332 to 179342) and are available from the authors upon reasonable request. Any other relevant data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Code availability
Custom MATLAB Scripts used for data analysis and preparation of figures shown in this publication are provided as Supplementary Software 1. All MATLAB Scripts were confirmed to run on MATLAB version 2021b.
References
Eagon, R. G. Generation Time of Less Than 10 min J. Bacteriol. 83, 736–737 (1962).
Payne, W. J. Studies on bacterial utilization of uronic acids. III. Induction of oxidative enzymes in a marine isolate. J. Bacteriol. 76, 301–307 (1958).
Hoff, J. et al. Vibrio natriegens: an ultrafast-growing marine bacterium as emerging synthetic biology chassis. Environ. Microbiol. 22, 4394–4408 (2020).
Hoffart, E. et al. High substrate uptake rates empower Vibrio natriegens as production host for industrial biotechnology. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 83, 1–10 (2017).
Weinstock, M. T., Hesek, E. D., Wilson, C. M. & Gibson, D. G. Vibrio natriegens as a fast-growing host for molecular biology. Nat. Methods 13, 849–851 (2016).
Aiyar, S. E., Gaal, T. & Gourse, R. L. rRNA promoter activity in the fast-growing bacterium Vibrio natriegens. J. Bacteriol. 184, 1349–1358 (2002).
Kato, J. & Hashimoto, M. Construction of consecutive deletions of the Escherichia coli chromosome. Mol. Syst. Biol. 3, 132 (2007).
Pósfai, G. et al. Emergent Properties of Reduced-Genome Escherichia coli. Sci. (80-.). 312, 1044 LP–1041046 (2006).
Lee, J. H. et al. Metabolic engineering of a reduced-genome strain of Escherichia coli for L-threonine production. Microb. Cell Fact. 8, 2 (2009).
Selas Castiñeiras, T., Williams, S. G., Hitchcock, A. G. & Smith, D. C. E. coli strain engineering for the production of advanced biopharmaceutical products. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 365, fny162 (2018).
Isaacs, F. J. et al. Precise Manipulation of Chromosomes in Vivo Enables Genome-Wide Codon Replacement. Sci. (80-.). 333, 348 LP–348353 (2011).
Baba, T. et al. Construction of Escherichia coli K-12 in-frame, single-gene knockout mutants: the Keio collection. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2, 2006.0008–2006.0008 (2006).
Jiang, Y. et al. Multigene Editing in the Escherichia coli Genome via the CRISPR-Cas9 System. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 81, 2506 LP–2502514 (2015).
Reisch, C. R. & Prather, K. L. J. The no-SCAR (Scarless Cas9 Assisted Recombineering) system for genome editing in Escherichia coli. Sci. Rep. 5, 15096 (2015).
Wang, H. H. et al. Programming cells by multiplex genome engineering and accelerated evolution. Nature 460, 894–898 (2009).
Maida, I. et al. Draft Genome Sequence of the Fast-Growing Bacterium Vibrio natriegens Strain DSMZ 759. Genom. Announc. 1, e00648–13 (2013).
Wang, Z., Lin, B., Hervey, W. J. 4th & Vora, G. J. Draft Genome Sequence of the Fast-Growing Marine Bacterium Vibrio natriegens Strain ATCC 14048. Genom. Announc 1, e00589–13 (2013).
Lee, H. H., Ostrov, N., Gold, M. A. & Church, G. M. Recombineering in Vibrio natriegens. bioRxiv 130088 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1101/130088.
Lee, H. H. et al. Vibrio natriegens, a new genomic powerhouse. bioRxiv 58487 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1101/058487.
Dalia, T. N. et al. Multiplex Genome Editing by Natural Transformation (MuGENT) for Synthetic Biology in Vibrio natriegens. ACS Synth. Biol. 6, 1650–1655 (2017).
Seitz, P. & Blokesch, M. Cues and regulatory pathways involved in natural competence and transformation in pathogenic and environmental Gram-negative bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 37, 336–363 (2013).
Johnsborg, O., Eldholm, V. & Håvarstein, L. S. Natural genetic transformation: prevalence, mechanisms and function. Res. Microbiol. 158, 767–778 (2007).
Aparicio, T., de Lorenzo, V. & Martínez-García, E. CRISPR/Cas9-enhanced ssDNA recombineering for Pseudomonas putida. Microb. Biotechnol. 12, 1076–1089 (2019).
Penewit, K. et al. Efficient and Scalable Precision Genome Editing in Staphylococcus aureus through Conditional Recombineering and CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Counterselection. MBio 9, e00067–18 (2018).
Jiang, W., Bikard, D., Cox, D., Zhang, F. & Marraffini, L. A. RNA-guided editing of bacterial genomes using CRISPR-Cas systems. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 233–239 (2013).
Cui, L. & Bikard, D. Consequences of Cas9 cleavage in the chromosome of Escherichia coli. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, 4243–4251 (2016).
Shuman, S. & Glickman, M. S. Bacterial DNA repair by non-homologous end joining. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 5, 852–861 (2007).
Lee, H. H. et al. Functional genomics of the rapidly replicating bacterium Vibrio natriegens by CRISPRi. Nat. Microbiol. 4, 1105–1113 (2019).
Meyer, A. J., Segall-Shapiro, T. H., Glassey, E., Zhang, J. & Voigt, C. A. Escherichia coli ‘Marionette’ strains with 12 highly optimized small-molecule sensors. Nat. Chem. Biol. 15, 196–204 (2019).
Stukenberg, D. et al. The Marburg Collection: a Golden Gate DNA Assembly Framework for Synthetic Biology Applications in Vibrio natriegens. ACS Synth. Biol. (2021) https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.1c00126.
Kim, I. et al. Solution structure and dynamics of anti-CRISPR AcrIIA4, the Cas9 inhibitor. Sci. Rep. 8, 3883 (2018).
Yang, H. & Patel, D. J. Inhibition Mechanism of an Anti-CRISPR Suppressor AcrIIA4 Targeting SpyCas9. Mol. Cell 67, 117–127.e5 (2017).
Aschenbrenner, S. et al. Coupling Cas9 to artificial inhibitory domains enhances CRISPR-Cas9 target specificity. Sci. Adv. 6, eaay0187 (2020).
Shin, J. et al. Disabling Cas9 by an anti-CRISPR DNA mimic. Sci. Adv. 3, e1701620 (2017).
Bubeck, F. et al. Engineered anti-CRISPR proteins for optogenetic control of CRISPR–Cas9. Nat. Methods 15, 924–927 (2018).
Hoffmann, M. D. et al. Cell-specific CRISPR-Cas9 activation by microRNA-dependent expression of anti-CRISPR proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, e75 (2019).
Wasels, F., Chartier, G., Hocq, R. & Lopes Ferreira, N. A CRISPR/Anti-CRISPR Genome Editing Approach Underlines the Synergy of Butanol Dehydrogenases in Clostridium acetobutylicum DSM 792. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 86, e00408–e00420 (2020).
Bik, E. M., Bunschoten, A. E., Willems, R. J. L., Chang, A. C. Y. & Mooi, F. R. Genetic organization and functional analysis of the otn DNA essential for cell-wall polysaccharide synthesis in Vibrio cholerae O139. Mol. Microbiol. 20, 799–811 (1996).
Pfeifer, E. et al. Generation of a Prophage-Free Variant of the Fast-Growing Bacterium Vibrio natriegens. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 85, e00853–19 (2019).
Van Die, I. M., Zuidweg, E. M., Bergmans, J. E. N. & Hoekstra, W. P. M. Transformability of galE variants derived from uropathogenic Escherichia coli strains. J. Bacteriol. 158, 760–761 (1984).
Bursztyn, H., Sgaramella, V., Ciferri, O. & Lederberg, J. Transfectability of rough strains of Salmonella typhimurium. J. Bacteriol. 124, 1630–1634 (1975).
Blokesch, M. & Schoolnik, G. K. The Extracellular Nuclease Dns and Its Role in Natural Transformation of Vibrio cholerae. J. Bacteriol. 190, 7232 LP–7237240 (2008).
Su, S. S., Lahue, R. S., Au, K. G. & Modrich, P. Mispair specificity of methyl-directed DNA mismatch correction in vitro. J. Biol. Chem. 263, 6829–6835 (1988).
Detloff, P., Sieber, J. & Petes, T. D. Repair of specific base pair mismatches formed during meiotic recombination in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 11, 737 LP–737745 (1991).
Meier, P. & Wackernagel, W. Impact of mutS inactivation on foreign DNA acquisition by natural transformation in Pseudomonas stutzeri. J. Bacteriol. 187, 143–154 (2005).
Bindels, D. S. et al. mScarlet: a bright monomeric red fluorescent protein for cellular imaging. Nat. Methods 14, 53–56 (2017).
Nikolay, R. et al. Validation of a fluorescence-based screening concept to identify ribosome assembly defects in Escherichia coli. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, e100–e100 (2014).
Cavanagh, A. T., Chandrangsu, P. & Wassarman, K. M. 6S RNA regulation of relA alters ppGpp levels in early stationary phase. Microbiology 156, 3791–3800 (2010).
Jaishankar, J. & Srivastava, P. Molecular Basis of Stationary Phase Survival and Applications. Front. Microbiol. 8, 2000 (2017).
Kleinstiver, B. P. et al. Engineered CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases with altered PAM specificities. Nature 523, 481–485 (2015).
Walton, R. T., Christie, K. A., Whittaker, M. N. & Kleinstiver, B. P. Unconstrained genome targeting with near-PAMless engineered CRISPR-Cas9 variants. Sci. (80-.). 368, 290 LP–290296 (2020).
Hu, J. H. et al. Evolved Cas9 variants with broad PAM compatibility and high DNA specificity. Nature 556, 57–63 (2018).
Vojcic, L., Despotovic, D., Martinez, R., Maurer, K.-H. & Schwaneberg, U. An efficient transformation method for Bacillus subtilis DB104. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 94, 487–493 (2012).
Dalia, A. B., McDonough, E. & Camilli, A. Multiplex genome editing by natural transformation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 111, 8937 LP–8938942 (2014).
Visick, K. L., Hodge-Hanson, K. M., Tischler, A. H., Bennett, A. K. & Mastrodomenico, V. Tools for Rapid Genetic Engineering of Vibrio fischeri. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 84, e00850–18 (2018).
Blomqvist, T., Steinmoen, H. & Håvarstein, L. S. Natural genetic transformation: a novel tool for efficient genetic engineering of the dairy bacterium Streptococcus thermophilus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72, 6751–6756 (2006).
Morrison, D. A., Khan, R., Junges, R., Åmdal, H. A. & Petersen, F. C. Genome editing by natural genetic transformation in Streptococcus mutans. J. Microbiol. Methods 119, 134–141 (2015).
Doench, J. G. et al. Rational design of highly active sgRNAs for CRISPR-Cas9–mediated gene inactivation. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 1262–1267 (2014).
Calvo-Villamañán, A. et al. On-target activity predictions enable improved CRISPR–dCas9 screens in bacteria. Nucleic Acids Res. 48, e64–e64 (2020).
Gibson, D. G. et al. Enzymatic assembly of DNA molecules up to several hundred kilobases. Nat. Methods 6, 343–345 (2009).
Acknowledgements
We thank Prof. Ankur B. Dalia for supplying plasmid pMMB-TfoX and Prof. Christopher A. Voigt for the Marionette Sensor Collection which was supplied through Addgene (Addgene Kit #1000000137). Lastly, we thank Dr. Patrick Sobetzko and Marc Teufel for intense discussions throughout the project.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
D.S., and A.B. conceived the design of this project. D.S. performed the majority of experiments. J.H. characterized transformation efficiency of mutant strains and A.F. constructed and tested inducible promoters used in the NT-CRISPR plasmid. D.S. analyzed the data. D.S. and A.B. wrote the paper. A.B. supervised the study. This work was funded by the State of Hesse (Germany) through the LOEWE research cluster MOSLA and the European Union through the BioRoboost project (H2020-NMBP-TR-IND-2018-2020/BIOTEC-01-2018 (CSA), Project ID 210491758). D.S. received funding through the International Max Planck Research School for Environmental, Cellular, and Molecular Microbiology (IMPRS-Mic).
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Communications Biology thanks Dominik Niopek and the other, anonymous, reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editors: Audrone Lapinaite and Caitlin Karniski.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Stukenberg, D., Hoff, J., Faber, A. et al. NT-CRISPR, combining natural transformation and CRISPR-Cas9 counterselection for markerless and scarless genome editing in Vibrio natriegens. Commun Biol 5, 265 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-022-03150-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-022-03150-0
This article is cited by
-
Vibrio natriegens as a superior host for the production of c-type cytochromes and difficult-to-express redox proteins
Scientific Reports (2024)
-
Rationally designed chromosome fusion does not prevent rapid growth of Vibrio natriegens
Communications Biology (2024)
-
Vibrio species as next-generation chassis for accelerated synthetic biology
Biotechnology and Bioprocess Engineering (2024)
-
NT-CRISPR: Methode zur gentechnischen Veränderung von Vibrio natriegens
BIOspektrum (2023)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.