Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Sex differences in SARS-CoV-2 infection rates and the potential link to prostate cancer


The recent outbreak of infections and the pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2 represent one of the most severe threats to human health in more than a century. Emerging data from the United States and elsewhere suggest that the disease is more severe in men. Knowledge gained, and lessons learned, from studies of the biological interactions and molecular links that may explain the reasons for the greater severity of disease in men, and specifically in the age group at risk for prostate cancer, will lead to better management of COVID-19 in prostate cancer patients. Such information will be indispensable in the current and post-pandemic scenarios.


The COVID-19 disease pandemic caused by the rapid spread of acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection has affected more than 7,500,000 cases and claimed more than 430,000 lives ( The disease has resulted in substantial individual and societal costs and presents a significant challenge to the global scientific and medical community. COVID-19 affects both sexes, and every age group and ethnicity, albeit to varying degrees. COVID-19 disease burden is disproportionately higher in men, and adverse outcomes are further compounded by older age and comorbidities.

Prostate cancer patients belong to the age group that is more susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 infection and, given their cancer, are at a higher risk of developing severe illness due to a weak immune system. Furthermore, approximately 18% of prostate cancer patients have multiple comorbid conditions1 that can exacerbate the risks associated with COVID-19 infection. While much is now known about how the virus gains entry into the host cells (Fig. 1) and the general disease trajectory (see Box 1), how COVID-19 infection may impact different patient populations is not yet well known. Clinicians caring for prostate cancer patients will be expected to mitigate the risks associated with COVID-19 infections while also providing the best clinical care for patients who are dealing with decisions about biopsy, active surveillance, surgery, radiation, hormonal therapy, and chemotherapy. This review summarizes recent developments and research and provides just-in-time considerations of our current understanding in three areas: the epidemiological and biological evidence for gender and/or sex disparity in COVID-19 disease; the potential association between COVID-19 and prostate cancer molecular pathogenesis; and current therapeutic options for COVID-19 patients and, in particular, COVID-19 patients with prostate cancer.

Fig. 1: Molecular drivers of SARS-CoV-2 productive infection.
figure 1

ACE2 and TMPRSS2 are co-expressed on ciliated bronchial epithelial cells and type II pneumocytes and the epithelia of small intestine thus making these potential organ sites and routes for SARS-CoV-2 infection. The virus utilizes the Spike glycoprotein (S) to attach to the host cell and trigger fusion events between the virus and host lipid bilayers. Host ACE2 and TMPRSS2 are critical mediators of this process. The virus is then internalized through receptor-mediated endocytosis, or via clathrin-mediated pathways or through lipid rafts at the plasma membrane. Once inside the host cytoplasm, the viruses release their genomes to allow replication of their genetic material. Encapsulated viral-like particles with RNA genomes arise in the ERGIC complex before they erupt as mature virus.

Epidemiological evidence for, and biological mediators of, sex disparity in COVID-19 disease

Sex-based differences in incidence and mortality from COVID-19: The SARS-CoV-2 virus, which is responsible for COVID-19, binds to ACE receptors in the lungs, causing alveolar damage and is the central phase of disease progression2. Emerging global data suggest that men appear at higher risk of infection and mortality from COVID-19 with SARS-CoV-2 than women3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13. This sex-based disparity is seen in incidence and hospitalization, as well as in mortality from COVID-199. This disparity was first reported from China, where the death rate among men was 2.8% vs. 1.7% in women10. Subsequently, this sex-based disparity was reported from France, Germany, Iran, Italy, South Korea, UK, and USA. A recent meta-analysis, that included 59,254 patients from 61 studies, reported higher incidence in, as well as fatality from, COVID-19 in males compared to females11. Italian epidemiological data suggest a 3:1 male:female ratio for SARS CoV-2 infection9. Data from a case series of COVID-19 patients in China indicate that the risk of death is 2.4 times higher in men than in women12. As of June 14th 2020, mortality by sex in New York State was reported to be 42% for females vs. 58% for males ( In a case series of COVID-19 patients hospitalized in New York City, 60.3% of inpatients were male, 66.5% of inpatients who required ICU admission were male, and mortality rates were consistently higher for males across all age groups older than 20 years13. Emerging data from multiple countries indicate higher incidence and mortality of COVID-19 in men (Table 1).

Table 1 COVID-19 Incidence and fatality rates across different countries6,152.

Comorbidities contribute to sex differences in COVID-19: The relationship between COVID-19, comorbidities (e.g. hypertension, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and obesity), behavioral factors (e.g., smoking and alcohol consumption), and sex is complex. Comorbidity accounts for 71% of hospital admissions and up to 90% of ICU admissions14,15. Diabetes and cardiovascular disease alone account for two-thirds of COVID-19 related ICU admissions15 and hypertension is seen in 50–70% of all COVID-19 hospitalizations in patients over the age of 5014. Along with age, cardiovascular illness predicts disease severity and ICU admissions, as do hypertension and obesity16,17,18,19,20,21,22. ICU admissions were twice as high in diabetic or hypertensive patients, and three times as high in patients with cardiovascular disease23. Comparison of plasma levels of ACE2 from two separate cohorts comprising of 537 women and 1485 men with heart failure, revealed that the circulating levels of ACE2 in the plasma of men were higher than levels tested in women. Based on this evidence, the study suggests that the difference in plasma ACE2 may explain the severity of COVID-19 in men24. A study conducted in France confirmed that obesity was a risk factor for invasive mechanical ventilation, the risk being highest in those with a BMI > 35 kg/m218. Males have higher comorbidities than females globally. Patients with comorbidities have a higher risk of infection with SARS-CoV-2, the most common being COPD, diabetes, hypertension, and cancer (Table 2). Further, among COVID-19 positive patients the incidence of comorbidities was found to be higher in males compared to females (Table 2). Initial studies in China reported COPD, diabetes, hypertension, and cancer as a significant risk factors for worse outcomes in hospitalized patients22. In a study of 168 severely ill COVID-19 patients, male patients were more likely to have comorbidities and men with comorbidities were more critically ill compared to men without comorbidities25. In another study of 5700 COVID-19 patients in the New York City area, the predominant comorbidities in hospitalized patients were hypertension, obesity, and diabetes13.

Table 2 Incidence of comorbidity in COVID-19 patients by sex6,40,153.

Another reason for more severe COVID-19 infection in men may be because they are more likely than women to be active smokers. Active smoking has been shown to raise ACE2 receptor expression in the lungs, which increases SARS-CoV-2 attachment and entry into alveolar epithelial cells26,27. We can also infer that because smoking is more common in men and because smoking leads to such comorbidities as pulmonary hypertension and chronic lung disease, being a male smoker with comorbidities may represent high risk for susceptibility to COVID-19. We note, here, however, that lung cancer is the second most common cancer in both men and women and the leading cause of cancer deaths. Further study on the effects of active tobacco use on COVID-19 will be needed to determine specific associations with other comorbidities.

Smoking alters the physiological ratio of androgen to estrogen, which can lead to the priming of TMPRSS228. A retrospective cohort study of 87 Chinese patients analyzed risk factors for worse COVID-19 disease progression, including clinical characteristics, age, and history of smoking. Smokers were 14 times more likely to show worse outcomes29. Multiple observational studies have been conducted to affirm the association between active smoking and adverse outcomes in COVID-19, including severe symptom progression, ICU admission, and death. While no differences in mortality between smokers and non-smokers were found, the majority of the studies found that significantly higher proportions of patients with severe COVID-19 symptoms and those requiring ICU admission were active or past smokers26,30,31,32,33. In a systematic review, Vardavas et al. concluded that smokers were 1.4 times more likely to exhibit severe COVID-19 symptoms and 2.4 times more likely to need intensive care27.

Age as a factor for higher risk: The most substantial factor for susceptibility to, complications of, and mortality from COVID-19 is age9,12,19,20,25,29,31,34. Older age is a strong predictor of death in almost all of the published studies, regardless of the risk group under investigation (cancer patients, patients with comorbidities, ICU admissions, etc.)9,19,20,31. Older males had higher comorbidities than females and also higher risk of worse outcomes from the infection12,25. Older patients are eight times more likely to have worse disease progression29. In studies from China, case fatality ratios were 20 times higher in those older than 60 than those younger34; and twice as high for those older than 80 than those between 60–80 years of age34,35. The same age trend was seen when comparing the likelihood of hospitalization from COVID-19. These results are consistent with US census data36,37, including cumulative hospitalization rates at 89.3 per 100,000, with the highest rates in people 65 years and above38. The CDC lists age above 65 as the top risk factor for developing severe COVID-19 illness, followed by chronic lung disease, heart disease, immune suppression, obesity, diabetes, and kidney disease39.

The study of gender-based and sex-based differences in COVID-19 is a priority, since better understanding of these disparities will help in the development of better therapeutic strategies and vaccines, as well as public health policies.

Cancer and COVID-19: In addition to the other comorbidities, growing evidence suggests worse clinical outcomes for cancer patients with COVID-19. Cancer patients suffering from COVID-19 are at a higher risk for fatality from COVID-19 mainly due to their immunosuppressive state and co-existing medical conditions40. Initial studies from China and Italy first suggested that cancer patients are susceptible to severe forms of the disease including mortality41,42,43,44. Dai et al. reported in their study on patients hospitalized in Hubei Province in China, that cancer patients had a significantly higher mortality compared to patients without cancer. Further, patients with metastatic cancer were at even higher risk. Mechanical ventilations (OR 2.71, P < 0.04), ICU admissions (OR 3.13, P < 0.01), and death rates (OR 2,17, P < 0.06) were reported to be higher in cancer COVID-19 patients than age-matched cancer-free counterparts40. Another meta-analysis on a cohort from China on 44,672 patients also confirms that cancer patients were at significantly higher risk of death from COVID-1945. A population-wide study on 4532 Italian patients found 118 patients had prostate cancer (2.6%), and 430 (9.4%) of all patients had cancer. The study highlighted the role of sex specifically in patients with cancer; male cancer patients were 79% more likely to test positive for SARS CoV-2 (OR 1.79, 95% CI 1.62–1.98, P < 0.0001)46.

Studies on COVID-19 patients from a New York Health System reported that compared to non-cancer patients, the fatality rates due to COVID-19 were two to three times higher in cancer patients. The study also investigated the mortality rates of COVID-19 among the most common cancer types observed in the US population and found the rates to be 55% for lung cancer, 14% for breast cancer, 20% for prostate cancer, and 38% for colorectal cancer47. A study from the Mount Sinai Health System reported that of 5688 COVID-19 patients 6% had breast, prostate, lung, urothelial, and colon cancer with 89% higher risk of intubation than non-cancer patients48. The incidence of, and mortality from, COVID-19 in cancer patients, is shown in Table 3. In addition, our unpublished data suggests similar patterns of greater disease burden in men. Mount Sinai Health System data from March 1, 2020 to April 26, 2020 includes 9648 COVID-19 positive patients; 5238 (54.3%) were male, of which 114 (2.2%) had been diagnosed with prostate cancer. The rate of intubation was greater in those with a diagnosis of prostate cancer than male patients with a malignancy other than prostate cancer (25.4% and 21.3% respectively, P = 0.02). The mortality rate in this cohort of prostate cancer patients was also statistically greater than the rate of mortality among all male patients in the cohort with a malignancy other than prostate cancer (23.7% (N = 27) vs. 12.7% (N = 43) respectively, P < 0.01).

Table 3 Incidence and mortality rates of cancer cases with COVID-1940,48,154.

In summary, cancer patients are more susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 infection and are associated with more severe outcomes.

Hormonal regulation and immunological basis of sex-differences in infectious diseases: Immunological differences between males and females contribute to divergence between males and females in response to SARS-CoV-2. Men are more susceptible to virus infection and produce lower levels of antibodies than women. Women have a stronger innate immune system, which confers quick and broad protection to viral infections. Innate immune cells like macrophages, monocytes, mast cells, and dendritic cells play a vital role in this process49,50,51. Innate immune recognition involves the protein sensors of RNA viruses, such as SARS-CoV-2, which are encoded by genes belonging to the family of Toll-like receptors (TLRs) located on the X-chromosome. TLR7 and TLR8 are capable of detecting single-stranded RNA. Because of its bi-allelic expression, women have higher levels of TLR7, which contributes to stronger innate immune responses and faster clearance of the virus. In addition to TLR7, several other immune regulatory genes located on the X-chromosome (e.g., TLR8, FOXP3, CXCR3, and CD40L) contribute to stronger immune response against viruses in women7,51,52,53. Women also show higher levels of type-1 interferon genes that are critical to jump-starting innate immune response following a bacterial or virus challenge53,54. A sex difference is also reported with regard to viral shedding55,56. Time to clearance of SARS-CoV-2 was found to be significantly earlier in females compared to male COVID-19 patients55,56. Also within families with more than one infected family member, females cleared the virus faster56. A recent meta-analysis of COVID-19 patients explained key immunological differences in males and females that affect susceptibility. The study found higher prevalence of immune mediators that are associated with adverse outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 in men, including TNFSF13B, CCL14, CCL23, IL-7, IL-16, and IL-1857.

Differences in the activity of male and female steroid hormones could potentially impact COVID-19 disease pathogenesis, prophylaxis, and response to antiviral drugs and vaccines. Studies have shown that the steroid hormones testosterone, estrogen, and progesterone, and their respective nuclear hormone receptors, regulate downstream signaling that evokes different effects and responses from the immune system54,58. The prevailing model for classification of hormonal influence on immune responses suggests that testosterone and progesterone decrease immune responses while estrogens can enhance immune responses58. Estrogen receptors (ERs) play an essential role in the development of female reproductive physiology, and aberrant estrogen/estrogen receptor signaling is a significant oncogenic driver for breast cancer. Similar to androgens in males, estrogens, and estrogen receptors in females can alter the activity of immune cell types associated with innate and adaptive immune response59,60,61,62,63 and have been shown to be immunoprotective. Sex-specific differences in innate and adaptive responses contribute to the disparity in disease outcomes following a viral challenge. Immune cells associated with innate response, including monocytes, dendritic cells, and macrophages, are functionally more active in females54. Estrogens suppress the production of IL-12 from stimulated macrophages and levels of pro-inflammatory IL-6 by directly altering CD1659,63. In addition, estrogens also influence the levels of natural killer (NK) cells59,60. NK cells were found to be higher in women above age 70 when compared to men of the same age group. Women in this age group had a higher CD56bright/CD56dim ratio59,62. Notably, compared to males the CD56dim (mature NK) cells tested in females had more functional cytolytic activity and produced higher levels of MIP-154,59,62.

A comparison of adaptive immune responses between males and females demonstrates that, females have higher levels of CD4/CD8 ratios59. Interestingly several proinflammatory and antiviral genes expressed by cytotoxic T cells carry estrogen receptor elements in their promoter and contribute to stronger cytotoxic response in females54,64.

Preclinical animal studies of SARS and MERS virus have demonstrated sex-specific differences in infectivity, with males showing a higher prevalence and severity of the infection. When challenged with the SARS-CoV virus, male mice showed elevated expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines CCL2 and IL-6 in the lungs and consequently severe pathogenesis associated with the infection65. In the absence of estrogens, the effects of pro-inflammatory TNF and CCL2 expression from pathogenic IMMs and neutrophils contribute to poor outcome following SARS infection in males65.

In the context of both SARS and MERS, males seem to be more severely affected than females4,66,67. Several SNPs in the epidermal growth factor (EGF) gene were associated with ARDS risk in males but no association could be predicted in females. EGF is one of the critical components in the proliferative phase of ARDS. In one study, SNPs resulted in an upregulation of EGF that may worsen ARDS in males68. Another study reported that males were more prone to endothelial dysfunction and that women were protected in this regard69. Endothelial dysfunction is key in triggering ARDS and these associations may suggest a potential mechanism of protection in females against SARS or MERS.

Distinguishing early immune activation events from later phases of the disease where the immune system is dysregulated due to chronic inflammatory signals would be key in enhancing our understanding of the disease. Study designs could include the criteria of disease stages and analyze men or women within a specific disease stage. It is also critical to consider that the outcomes of treatments may differ by sex, and sex bias would be an important parameter to consider in testing therapies in the future.

In summary, females exhibit robust innate and adaptive immune responses to viral infections. Elevated transcriptional activation of immune response genes on the X-chromosome and sex-specific steroids like estrogens, help to facilitate faster clearance of viral loads in females70.

Potential association between COVID-19 and prostate cancer molecular pathogenesis

Common risk factors for the two diseases: Accumulating evidence suggests similarities between risk factors for COVID-19 and prostate cancer (Fig. 2). Comorbidities such as hypertension, diabetes, and alcoholism, and behavioral factors like active smoking that substantially influence the severity of COVID-1971 are also known to influence prostate cancer progression and outcomes1,72,73,74,75. Interestingly, the most potent common risk factor in the two diseases is age. The risk for prostate cancer increases in men above the age of 50, and notably, this is the age group that is most susceptible to complications of, and mortality from, COVID-199,12,19,20,25,29,31,34,76. Based on existing scientific knowledge, we can make a number of assumptions. First, older age and comorbidities (hypertension, diabetes, obesity, and smoking) that adversely affect COVID-19 are also lethal for prostate cancer. Second, prostate cancer patients are much more vulnerable to COVID-19 complications and risk of death due to their compromised immune status. Third, older males with prostate cancer who are active smokers, hypertensive, diabetic, and overweight are by far the most vulnerable group for contracting and dying from COVID-19.

Fig. 2: Comparison of Risk factors between COVID-19 and prostate cancer.
figure 2

Men are at a higher risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection than women. Shared risk factors involved in COVID-19 mortality, prostate cancer risk, and conceptual rationale for aggressive clinical management of COVID-19 in prostate cancer patients in the post-pandemic era or if the infection reoccurs.

Androgens impact immune response following viral infection: The androgen receptor (AR) gene located on the X-chromosome regulates developmental programs associated with male phenotypes77. Additionally, AR plays a critical role in regulating cellular programs associated with prostate physiology and homeostasis78. Dysregulation of androgen and AR signaling is directly associated with prostate cancer. Nuclear localization and transcriptional activation of AR is coordinated by binding to the ligands testosterone (T) or 5alpha-dihydrotestosterone (DHT)78. Recent studies indicate that ACE2 may be regulated by AR signaling57,79. Several studies have shown that androgens can impact the breadth of immune response by altering the activity of specific immune subsets that are directly involved in clearing viruses, for example, all cells derived from myeloid lineage express AR80. These include neutrophils, monocytes, macrophages, mast cells, and eosinophils. The immune suppressive effects of androgens on cells of the myeloid lineage are well characterized. In addition to myeloid cells, androgens also influence the functional activity of dendritic cells. In vitro studies demonstrate that androgens can suppress the expression of major histocompatibility complex (MHC)/human leukocyte antigen (HLA) and other costimulatory molecules on dendritic cells and thereby impact cytokine production and T-cell infiltration to the target area81. Androgens suppress B lymphopoiesis and are associated with low antibody production during vaccination61. Lower levels of antibody titer in males compared to females in response to infection or vaccination may be due to the underlying inhibitory effect of androgens on B cells and monocytes58,80. A study conducted in China reported that the concentration of the SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody was found to be significantly higher in the serum of critical female patients compared to males82. Thus, it is conceivable that a combination of immune suppressive effects and the oncogenic role of androgen/AR axis could potentially augment the magnitude of SARS-CoV-2 infection in men with prostate cancer, resulting in an unfavorable cancer outcome.

Cellular mediators of COVID-19 and potential crosstalk with prostate cancer: Another factor connecting COVID-19 infection and prostate cancer is the high expression of TMPRSS2 in prostate cancer. SARS-CoV-2 entry into the host cell depends on the serine protease activity of TMPRSS283,84,85,86,87. Cells overexpressing TMPRSS2 are susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 infection85. Compared to low levels of ACE2 expression as analyzed in multiple tissues, TMPRSS2 shows broad tissue distribution with higher expression (see refs. 87,88 and Supplementary Fig. 1). TMPRSS2 is highly expressed in urogenital organs like prostate, seminal vesicles, testis, epididymis, and kidney89. TMPRSS2 expression is regulated by androgen/AR signaling90,91,92,93,94,95. In the prostate, it is expressed primarily in the luminal cells and is fused with ETS transcription factors, predominantly ERG and ETV1, in a large proportion of prostate cancers96,97,98,99. Gene fusions between TMPRSS2 gene and ERG are evidenced in approximately 50% of prostate cancers96,97,98,99. TMPRSS2 is expressed at high levels in both primary, as well as in, metastatic prostate cancers. Several studies have demonstrated the presence of AR-responsive elements (AREs)/ARBSs in the promoter enhancer, as well as in the intronic region of the TMPRSS2 gene90,91,92,93,94,95. A significantly positive correlation for the expression of AR and TMPRSS2 was seen in both primary and metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer100. These findings indicate that more androgens could signify greater TMPRSS2 expression, which could potentially increase vulnerability to SARS-CoV-2. Interestingly, a recent study shows that ACE2 expression is higher in males and may be regulated by androgen/AR signaling. The study found evidence of AR and ACE2 co-expression in multiple tissues57. Further, single cell analysis showed the presence of ACE2 expressing cell clusters within the prostate and testis57. It appears that together both TMPRSS2 and ACE2 might be under hormonal control. More validation studies are needed to confirm the direct role of androgens in the regulation of ACE2.

COVID-19 related inflammation, TMPRSS2, and prostate cancer: Recurrent gene arrangements are common in prostate cancer, and catastrophic chromosome rearrangements are a hallmark of prostate carcinogenesis101,102,103,104. Recent studies have shown that inflammation-induced oxidative stress is an essential driver of oncogenic TMPRSS2-ERG fusions105. Treatment of prostate cancer cells with TNFα produced a robust inflammatory response that resulted in DNA breaks and de novo genomic arrangements mediated by a non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) process105.

Work from others and ongoing studies in our laboratory suggest that systemic and pelvic inflammation are critical factors for prostate cancer progression and that proinflammatory cytokines (e.g., IL-1, IL-6, IL-8, and MCP-1) can accelerate the progression of existing disease (manuscript in preparation)106,107,108. Interestingly, elevated levels of IL-1 and IL-6 are also associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection109,110. The levels of TNF alpha cytokine are elevated in the blood and tissue of patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection and are a major contributor to immune pathology in conjunction with IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, and MCP-149,111.

Due to a higher incidence of COVID-19 in males, the direct role of TMPRSS2 gene in the infection, and the potential association between inflammation and prostate cancer, studies that critically address the impact of inflammatory cytokines TNF, IL-1β, IL-6, and IL-8 on prostate cancer can help us to better understand the impact of COVID19 on prostate cancer etiology and carcinogenesis.

Emerging evidence suggests that SARS-CoV-2 infections and complications can adversely affect the urinary tract and genitourinary organs89 such as the kidney and testes. Recent studies suggest that SARS-CoV-2 in the testes may result in a delayed clearance and persistent viral infections in males56. SARS-CoV-2 has been detected in semen in addition to saliva, urine, stool, blood, and the gastrointestinal tract112,113.

COVID-19 related inflammation from adjacent tissues may augment prostate cancer: Inflammation is the driver of prostate cancer carcinogenesis114. Anatomically, the prostate is positioned below the bladder and lies close to the seminal vesicles and the rectum. For these reasons, the prostate may be vulnerable to adverse effects of the secreted inflammatory cytokine milieu that is generated as a result of SARS-CoV-2 in semen, the testes, and feces. Semen is produced by secretions from the seminal vesicle, prostate, and testes. Vas deferens, the duct that carries sperm from the testes, enters the ejaculatory duct and then passes through the prostate to the urethra. This trajectory could result in the dissemination of viral cytokines to the prostate with deleterious outcomes.

It is interesting to note that seminal vesicles express ACE2 and TMPRSS289,115,116 and could be a direct target of SARS-CoV-2 infection that could result in an inflammatory mileu in the vicinity of the prostate. Conceptually this can occur through systemic circulation via the arteries that feed the prostate and seminal vesicles, or via ducts that connect the prostate and seminal vesicles, and could have deleterious effect on prostate cancer progression (Fig. 3). Further, based on a recent study57 that showed ACE2 and TMPRSS2 are expressed in prostate cells, it is conceivable that prostate may be a direct target of SARS-CoV-2 associated inflammation and adverse pathogenesis of COVID-19.

Fig. 3: Graphical representation of the theoretical risks and potential routes of dissemination of SARS-CoV-2 to the prostate.
figure 3

This is based on tissue level expression of a TMPRSS2 and ACE2; and b the presence of virus in body fluids such as urine, semen, and feces. Systemic or tissue derived inflammation, during COVID-19, has the potential to accelerate pre-existing prostate cancer resulting in an aggressive phenotype and therefore represents a potential risk factor for prostate cancer patients.

While these hypotheses are currently less well understood, they suggest potential risks and routes of dissemination of infection in the context of prostate cancer. They will require in-depth molecular validation and testing. The potential biological (hormone signaling, immunological) and behavioral differences between males and females that contribute to sex divergence in response to SARS-CoV-2 and the inferred link between COVID-19 and prostate cancer have been summarized in Fig. 4.

Fig. 4: Sex differences in COVID-19.
figure 4

Illustration highlights potential biological (hormone signaling, immunological) and behavioral differences between males and females that contribute to sex divergence in response to SARS-CoV-2. Estrogens have protective functions that contribute to stronger innate immune response in females resulting in faster clearance of virus loads. Androgens and AR regulate tissue level expression of TMPRSS2; serine protease involved in SARS-CoV-2 infection combined with immunosuppressive effects and comorbidities can contribute to the severity of disease in males. Inflammation, an outcome of COVID-19 associated with severe infection, is a potential risk factor for prostate cancer and can augment progression of active disease.

Current therapeutic options for COVID-19 patients and COVID-19 patients with prostate cancer

Drug repurposing: urgent clinical developments for the treatment of COVID-19: In the context of the current global pandemic, there is an unmet need for novel therapeutics to treat COVID-19. The focus has recently shifted toward the repurposing of existing drugs, including antivirals. To date, 1460 clinical trials are currently active worldwide, including 667 on therapeutic interventions, 199 of which are underway in the United States. More than 20 drugs are currently under investigation, most notably Remdesivir (Gilead; RNA-dependent RNA-polymerase inhibitor and broad spectrum antiviral), hydroxychloroquine (antimalarial), Lopinavir/Ritonavir (HIV-1 virus protease inhibitors), Tocilizumab (IL-6 inhibitor)117, Sarilumab (IL-6 antagonist), Favilavir (antiviral), inhaled nitric oxide, corticosteroids, and many more118,119. Remdesivir showed reduction in COVID-19 symptoms compared to placebo in an 800-patient, phase-II trial, launching the drug into phase III trials by Gilead and moving the drug one step closer toward FDA approval120,121. Remdesivir was available through compassionate use authorization by the FDA. A multicenter study showed clinical improvement in 68% of patients who received Remdesivir under compassionate use122. Rapamycin and Metformin are geroprotective drugs that have also been repurposed for prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infections in elderly people123. While Rapamycin, an mTOR inhibitor has been an effective antiviral agent in MERS-CoV infection124 as well as in patients with H1N1 pneumonia125, Metformin, is widely used as an oral diabetic medicine.

In addition to the drugs cited above, several other potential candidates are in various stages of development. Another RNA-dependent RNA-polymerase inhibitor, Favipiravir, shows promising results126,127. One surprising candidate is Famotidine, an H2 receptor antagonist commonly prescribed for heartburn128. The triple antiviral therapy lopinavir-ritonavir-interferon beta1b was shown to significantly reduce the duration of viral shedding by 5 days in COVID-19 positive patients129.

Efforts targeted at developing a vaccine are also underway, including mRNA-1273 and mRNA-1647 (Moderna, United States), INO-4800 (Inovio), Ad5-nCoV (CanSino Biologics), ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (Vaccitech, United Kingdom), LV-SMENP-DC (Shenzhen Geno-Immune Medical Institute, China), CD24Fc (Institute of Human Virology, United States), and nCoV-specific aAPC (Shenzhen Geno-immune Medical Institute, China), with more than one in phase I development130. Most of these vaccines are protein-based, and there appears to be a trend to produce more varieties of vector-based vaccines (Ad5-nCoV, LV-SMENP-DC, nCoV-specific aAPC). Very few, such as the vaccine by Moderna, are nucleic acid-based (mRNA-1273, INO-4800)131. Long-term outcomes are unclear, particularly in younger age groups and immune compromised individuals. As was the case with SARS-CoV, exposure to attenuated forms of SARS-CoV-2 may lead to hypersensitivity-induced exacerbation of COVID-19 symptoms, or stimulate viral mutation, propagating further outbreaks132. Additionally, timing for optimal effect, commercial availability, and production scalability of the vaccine are major issues during a pandemic133. Angiotensin receptor 1 (AT1) blockers (Losartan, Telmisartan) have been proposed as an alternative preventive therapy to vaccination134 and are currently in phase I testing (NCT04335123).

Prostate Cancer therapies repurposed for COVID-19 patients: Antiandrogens and TMPRSS2. Because TMPRSS2 is androgen regulated, several studies have advocated for the use of antiandrogens and androgen deprivation therapies (ADT) as a potential therapeutic option in COVID-19, suggesting possible protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection46,79,135,136. Consistent with this idea another study proposes that the severity of COVID19 may be influenced by androgen sensitivity79,137. Men with severe COVID-19 showed androgenetic alopecia, a clinical condition due to over expression of androgens and AR signaling137. A recent study in Italian patients in COVID-19 wards found that prostate cancer patients on androgen deprivation therapy were four times less likely to get infected than prostate cancer patients not taking androgen deprivation therapy, and five times less likely to contract the disease compared to patients with other cancer types46. A trial on the use of Bicalutamide (antiandrogen) on COVID-19 is underway in Baltimore, Maryland. (NCT04374279). With the hope of abrogating androgen dependent TMPRSS2 activation in COVID-19 male patients, the U.S. department of Veterans Affairs (VA) launched a phase II trial for the use of the hormone suppresser, Degarelix (GnRH analog, blocks luteinizing hormone and thereby reduces androgens) for COVID-19 male patients138. Despite the potential benefit of antiandrogens for the treatment COVID-19, a recent study cautions against the use of antiandrogens in COVID-19 patients and indicates that the treatment may be ineffective against lung TMPRSS2139. In a related study using mouse models, antiandrogens were shown to be ineffective in decreasing lung TMPRSS2 expression and high AR expression in the lungs suggested TMPRSS2-independent androgen receptor mediated regulation in males140. Interestingly, in lung A549 cells TMPRSS2 is also regulated by the glucocorticoid, Dexamethasone141. Glucocorticoid receptor (GR) inhibitors have been studied in the context of prostate cancer and have been shown to increase the therapeutic benefit of antiandrogens. For these reasons, repositioning GR inhibitors for the treatment of COVID-19 patients may be a viable option.

An alternative to antiandrogens, TMPRSS2 function can be altered by blocking its enzymatic activity136. Examples of drugs in this category include TMPRSS2 protease inhibitors such as Bromhexine (mucolytic agent), Camostat and Nafamostat (serine protease inhibitors), and aerosolized aprotinin (antiviral). Bromhexine, Camostat, and Nafamostat are currently under investigation in more than nine clinical trials (NCT04338906, NCT04355052, NCT04353284, NCT04321096, NCT04374019, NCT04352400, NCT04355026, NCT04273763, and NCT04340349).

Further, based on available evidence we hypothesize that prostate cancer patients on antiandrogens may be at a lower risk of COVID-19 infection and severity. Potential drugs and novel vaccines to combat SARS-CoV-2 infection, as well as repurposed drugs that could have an impact on prostate cancer management are listed in Fig. 5.

Fig. 5: Major drugs and vaccines for COVID-19.
figure 5

Illustration summarizes potential drugs and vaccines for COVID-19 that target either host receptors, viral replication, virus assembly, or host immune response. Drugs that have been implicated in prostate cancer management (Degalerix, Anti-androgens, Glucocorticoid receptor antagonists, metformin, and rapamycin) appear in the blue lines. # Nasal Poly-ICLC (Hiltonol®), Oncovir Inc, is being investigated as a new therapeutic agent at Mount Sinai.

Clinical management of COVID-19 positive prostate cancer patients: COVID-19 poses significant challenges for clinical decision-making and the management of prostate cancer patients. Physicians caring for prostate cancer patients will be expected to mitigate the risks associated with COVID-19 infections while also providing the best clinical care for patients who are dealing with decisions about biopsy, active surveillance, surgery, radiation, hormonal therapy, and chemotherapy. All of these scenarios will take place as new knowledge about, and treatments for, COVID-19 and COVID-19 as it overlaps with prostate cancer continue to evolve. In this context, a screening strategy for COVID-19 will be critical, as well as the development and implementation of a triage protocol and tools to quickly identify patients in need of immediate treatment. COVID-19 specific treatment guidelines are being developed for prostate cancer patients; nonetheless many decisions will be left to individual clinicians, especially given the uncertainty that surrounds potential new surges and the likely changes in the delivery of healthcare in the post-pandemic era.

Currently, no evidence exists on the outcomes of standard prostate cancer therapy in the setting of COVID-19, and treatment guidelines in cancer patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 are largely left up to the discretion of specialists142. Urologists may need to weigh the imminent risk of death from COVID-19 against the risk of death from cancer long-term.

Future directions

Moving forward, it is essential to recognize the nuanced challenges associated with COVID-19 and prostate cancer and to adopt novel strategies that will eventually lead to better management of COVID-19 in prostate cancer patients. The true susceptibility of prostate cancer patients to COVID-19 remains unclear at this point, despite early evidence of overlapping biology and common comorbidities and requires in-depth investigation. Such timely initiatives will guide prospective research and preparedness in the post-pandemic era and if a surge of SARS-CoV-2 infections reoccurs. The particular vulnerability of older men to COVID-19 compels us to advocate for routine screening of SARS-CoV-2 infections in prostate cancer patients. Clinical trials testing the value of diverse therapeutics in COVID-19 will be ongoing, and as we learn about the mechanisms of action in COVID-19 that cause lethal disease, we can expect within the next few months to have answers to pressing questions about treatment options.

Various urology, immunology, and oncology research groups, including our own, are exploring drug repurposing and novel immunomodulation strategies to combat COVID-19. While several studies are testing BCG143 and convalescent plasma144 for prevention of COVID-19, our group is examining potential new approaches for COVID-19, including the use of polyinosinic–polycytidylic acid stabilized with polylysine and carboxymethylcellulose (Poly-ICLC (Hiltonol®) a synthetic, stabilized double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) therapeutic viral mimic and a modulator of innate and adaptive immune responses145. Poly-ICLC has been shown to generate a broad spectrum of innate antiviral protections146,147,148,149,150 and earlier studies have demonstrated immediate protection in a mouse model of SARS-CoV with lethal infection151. Due to the severity of the pandemic in males, a clinical trial in men at risk or diagnosed with prostate cancer and interacting with health care workers for management of their prostate cancer is timely and of critical significance. We are currently exploring the feasibility of a clinical trial of nasal Poly-ICLC (Hiltonol®) for COVID-19 in men (age group ≥40) who are at high risk of contracting COVID-19 and with factors/comorbidities associated with higher mortality. An ongoing dose-escalation study (NCT03262103) to determine a safe dose and schedule of intratumoral (IT) plus intramuscular (IM) Poly-ICLC (Hiltonol®) injections prior to radical prostatectomy in patients with prostate cancer has shown that it was well tolerated in patients at high risk of recurrence (n = 6; Cohorts 1&2).

As the pandemic continues the ongoing work is focused on the development and performance of clinical trials in COVID-19 patients and the repurposing of existing drugs to establish their therapeutic efficacy. Precise and sophisticated molecular and biological knowledge should drive future clinical work, which can have near-term therapeutic benefit for patients diagnosed with COVID-19.

It is our obligation as researchers and clinicians to provide rigorous evidence-based knowledge during this global health crisis and to develop therapeutic options to address COVID-19 as the pandemic evolves. The work to combat the virus and prostate cancer is urgent and critical.


  1. Albertsen, P. C. et al. Impact of comorbidity on survival among men with localized prostate cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 29, 1335–1341 (2011).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wujtewicz, M. et al. COVID-19—what should anaethesiologists and intensivists know about it? Anaesthesiol. Intensive Ther. 52, 34–41 (2020).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Katie Polglase, G. M. a. M. F. Here’s why the coronavirus may be killing more men than women. The US should take note. (2020).

  4. Karlberg, J., Chong, D. S. & Lai, W. Y. Do men have a higher case fatality rate of severe acute respiratory syndrome than women do? Am. J. Epidemiol. 159, 229–231 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhao, S. et al. COVID-19 and gender-specific difference: analysis of public surveillance data in Hong Kong and Shenzhen, China, from January 10 to February 15, 2020. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 41, 1–2 (2020).

  6. Global Health 5050. COVID-19 sex-disaggregated data tracker: Sex, gender and COVID-19 (2020).

  7. Conti, P. & Younes, A. Coronavirus COV-19/SARS-CoV-2 affects women less than men: clinical response to viral infection. J. Biol. Regul. Homeost. Agents. (2020).

  8. Wenham, C., Smith, J. & Morgan, R. Gender & Group, C.-W. COVID-19: the gendered impacts of the outbreak. Lancet 395, 846–848 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Di Stadio, A., Ricci, G., Greco, A., de Vincentiis, M. & Ralli, M. Mortality rate and gender differences in COVID-19 patients dying in Italy: a comparison with other countries. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharm. Sci. 24, 4066–4067 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Epidemiology Working Group for NCIP Epidemic Response, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 41, 145–151. (2020). 

  11. Borges do Nascimento, I. J. et al. Novel coronavirus infection (COVID-19) in humans: a scoping review and meta-analysis. J. Clin. Med. (2020).

  12. Jian-Min Jin, P. B. et al. Gender differences in patients with COVID-19: focus on severity and mortality. Front. Public Health (2020).

  13. Richardson, S. et al. Presenting characteristics, comorbidities, and outcomes among 5700 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in the New York City area. Jama (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Garg, S. K. L. & Whitaker, M. Hospitalization rates and characteristics of patients hospitalized with laboratory-confirmed coronavirus Disease 2019—COVID-NET, 14 States, March 1–30, 2020. Centers Dis. Control Prev. (2020).

  15. Preliminary Estimates of the Prevalence of Selected Underlying Health Conditions Among Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 — United States, February 12–March 28, 2020

  16. Petrilli, C. M. et al. Factors associated with hospitalization and critical illness among 4,103 patients with COVID-19 disease in New York City. medRxiv (2020).

  17. Lighter, J. et al. Obesity in patients younger than 60 years is a risk factor for Covid-19 hospital admission. Clin. Infect. Dis. (2020).

  18. Simonnet, A. et al. High prevalence of obesity in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) requiring invasive mechanical ventilation. Obesity (2020).

  19. Du, R. H. et al. Predictors of mortality for patients with COVID-19 pneumonia caused by SARS-CoV-2: a prospective cohort study. Eur. Respir. J. (2020).

  20. Amitava Banerjee, L. P. et al Estimating excess 1-year mortality associated with the COVID-19 pandemic according to underlying conditions and age: a population-based cohort study. Lancet (2020).

  21. Wang, B., Li, R., Lu, Z. & Huang, Y. Does comorbidity increase the risk of patients with COVID-19: evidence from meta-analysis. Aging 12, 6049–6057 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Guan, W. J. et al. Comorbidity and its impact on 1590 patients with Covid-19 in China: a Nationwide analysis. Eur. Respir. J, (2020).

  23. Li, B. et al. Prevalence and impact of cardiovascular metabolic diseases on COVID-19 in China. Clin. Res. Cardiol. 109, 531–538 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sama, I. E. et al. Circulating plasma concentrations of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 in men and women with heart failure and effects of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone inhibitors. Eur. Heart J. 41, 1810–1817 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Meng, Y. et al. Sex-specific clinical characteristics and prognosis of coronavirus disease-19 infection in Wuhan, China: a retrospective study of 168 severe patients. PLoS Pathog. 16, e1008520 (2020).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Cai, H. Sex difference and smoking predisposition in patients with COVID-19. Lancet Respir. Med. 8, e20 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Vardavas, C. I. & Nikitara, K. COVID-19 and smoking: a systematic review of the evidence. Tob. Induc. Dis. 18, 20 (2020).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Cochran, C. J., Gallicchio, L., Miller, S. R., Zacur, H. & Flaws, J. A. Cigarette smoking, androgen levels, and hot flushes in midlife women. Obstet. Gynecol. 112, 1037–1044 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Liu, W. et al. Analysis of factors associated with disease outcomes in hospitalized patients with 2019 novel coronavirus disease. Chin. Med. J. 133, 1032–1038 (2020).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Guan, W. J. et al. Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in China. N. Engl. J. Med. 382, 1708–1720 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhou, F. et al. Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 395, 1054–1062 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhang, J. J. et al. Clinical characteristics of 140 patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 in Wuhan, China. Allergy (2020).

  33. Huang, C. et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet 395, 497–506 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Verity, R. et al. Estimates of the severity of coronavirus disease 2019: a model-based analysis. Lancet Infect. Dis. (2020).

  35. Young, B. E. et al. Epidemiologic features and clinical course of patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 in Singapore. Jama (2020).

  36. Wyatt Koma, T. N., Claxton, G., Rae, M., Kates, J. & Follow, J. M. How many adults are at risk of serious illness if infected with coronavirus? Updated Data (2020).

  37. Adams, M. L., Katz, D. L. & Grandpre, J. Population based estimates of comorbidities affecting risk for complications from COVID-19 in the US. medRxiv (2020).

  38. COVIDView A Weekly Surveillance Summary of U.S. COVID-19 Activity. Key Updates for Week 23, ending June 6 (2020).

  39. People Who Are at Increased Risk for Severe Illness. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2020).

  40. Dai, M. et al. Patients with cancer appear more vulnerable to SARS-COV-2: a multi-center study during the COVID-19 outbreak. Cancer Discov. (2020).

  41. Liang, W. et al. Cancer patients in SARS-CoV-2 infection: a nationwide analysis in China. Lancet Oncol. 21, 335–337 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Xia, Y., Jin, R., Zhao, J., Li, W. & Shen, H. Risk of COVID-19 for patients with cancer. Lancet Oncol. 21, e180 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Onder, G., Rezza, G. & Brusaferro, S. Case-fatality rate and characteristics of patients dying in relation to COVID-19 in Italy. Jama (2020).

  44. Wang, H. & Zhang, L. Risk of COVID-19 for patients with cancer. Lancet Oncol. 21, e181 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Deng, G., Yin, M., Chen, X. & Zeng, F. Clinical determinants for fatality of 44,672 patients with COVID-19. Crit. Care 24, 179 (2020).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Montopoli, M. et al. Androgen-deprivation therapies for prostate cancer and risk of infection by SARS-CoV-2: a population-based study (n = 4532). Ann. Oncol. (2020).

  47. Mehta, V. et al. Case fatality rate of cancer patients with COVID-19 in a New York Hospital System. Cancer Discov. (2020).

  48. Miyashita, H. et al. Do patients with cancer have a poorer prognosis of COVID-19? An experience in New York City. Ann. Oncol. (2020).

  49. Schett, G., Sticherling, M. & Neurath, M. F. COVID-19: risk for cytokine targeting in chronic inflammatory diseases? Nat. Rev. Immunol. 20, 271–272 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Tay, M. Z., Poh, C. M., Renia, L., MacAry, P. A. & Ng, L. F. P. The trinity of COVID-19: immunity, inflammation and intervention. Nat. Rev. Immunol. (2020).

  51. Kritas, S. K. et al. Mast cells contribute to coronavirus-induced inflammation: new anti-inflammatory strategy. J. Biol. Regul. Homeost. Agents (2020).

  52. Flanagan, K. L., Fink, A. L., Plebanski, M. & Klein, S. L. Sex and gender differences in the outcomes of vaccination over the life course. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 33, 577–599 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Klein, S. L. & Flanagan, K. L. Sex differences in immune responses. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 16, 626–638 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Klein, S. L. Sex influences immune responses to viruses, and efficacy of prophylaxis and treatments for viral diseases. Bioessays 34, 1050–1059 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Xu, K. et al. Factors associated with prolonged viral RNA shedding in patients with COVID-19. Clin. Infect. Dis. (2020).

  56. Aditi Shastri, J. W. et al. Delayed clearance of SARS-CoV2 in male compared to female patients: High ACE2 expression in testes suggests possible existence of gender-specific viral reservoirs. medRxiv (2020).

  57. Xiyi Wei, X. et al. Sex differences in severity and mortality among patients with COVID-19: evidence from pooled literature analysis and insights from integrated bioinformatic analysis. arxiv (2020).

  58. Oertelt-Prigione, S. The influence of sex and gender on the immune response. Autoimmun. Rev. 11, A479–A485 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Khan, D. & Ansar Ahmed, S. The immune system is a natural target for estrogen action: opposing effects of estrogen in two prototypical autoimmune diseases. Front. Immunol. 6, 635 (2015).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Curran, E. M. et al. Natural killer cells express estrogen receptor-alpha and estrogen receptor-beta and can respond to estrogen via a non-estrogen receptor-alpha-mediated pathway. Cell Immunol. 214, 12–20 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Smithson, G., Couse, J. F., Lubahn, D. B., Korach, K. S. & Kincade, P. W. The role of estrogen receptors and androgen receptors in sex steroid regulation of B lymphopoiesis. J. Immunol. 161, 27–34 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Al-Attar, A., Presnell, S. R., Peterson, C. A., Thomas, D. T. & Lutz, C. T. The effect of sex on immune cells in healthy aging: Elderly women have more robust natural killer lymphocytes than do elderly men. Mech. Ageing Dev. 156, 25–33 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Liao, Z. H. et al. Estrogen signaling effects on muscle-specific immune responses through controlling the recruitment and function of macrophages and T cells. Skelet. Muscle 9, 20 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Hewagama, A., Patel, D., Yarlagadda, S., Strickland, F. M. & Richardson, B. C. Stronger inflammatory/cytotoxic T-cell response in women identified by microarray analysis. Genes Immun. 10, 509–516 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Channappanavar, R. et al. Sex-based differences in susceptibility to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection. J. Immunol. 198, 4046–4053 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Leong, H. N. et al. SARS in Singapore—predictors of disease severity. Ann. Acad. Med. Singap. 35, 326–331 (2006).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Alghamdi, I. G. et al. The pattern of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus in Saudi Arabia: a descriptive epidemiological analysis of data from the Saudi Ministry of Health. Int. J. Gen. Med. 7, 417–423 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Sheu, C. C. et al. Sex-specific association of epidermal growth factor gene polymorphisms with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Eur. Respir. J. 33, 543–550 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Rathod, K. S. et al. Accelerated resolution of inflammation underlies sex differences in inflammatory responses in humans. J. Clin. Invest. 127, 169–182 (2017).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Meester, I. et al. SeXY chromosomes and the immune system: reflections after a comparative study. Biol. Sex. Differ. 11, 3 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Fang, L., Karakiulakis, G. & Roth, M. Are patients with hypertension and diabetes mellitus at increased risk for COVID-19 infection? Lancet Respir. Med. 8, e21 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Liang, Z. et al. Hypertension and risk of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci. Rep. 6, 31358 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Navin, S. & Ioffe, V. The association between hypertension and prostate cancer. Rev. Urol. 19, 113–118 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Lee, J., Giovannucci, E. & Jeon, J. Y. Diabetes and mortality in patients with prostate cancer: a meta-analysis. Springerplus 5, 1548 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Huncharek, M., Haddock, K. S., Reid, R. & Kupelnick, B. Smoking as a risk factor for prostate cancer: a meta-analysis of 24 prospective cohort studies. Am. J. Public Health 100, 693–701 (2010).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Deng, X. et al. Case fatality risk of the first pandemic wave of novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China. Clin. Infect. Dis. (2020).

  77. Simental, J. A., Sar, M., Lane, M. V., French, F. S. & Wilson, E. M. Transcriptional activation and nuclear targeting signals of the human androgen receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 266, 510–518 (1991).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Toivanen, R. & Shen, M. M. Prostate organogenesis: tissue induction, hormonal regulation and cell type specification. Development 144, 1382–1398 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Wambier, C. G. et al. Androgen sensitivity gateway to COVID-19 disease severity. Drug Dev. Res. (2020).

  80. Gubbels Bupp, M. R. & Jorgensen, T. N. Androgen-induced immunosuppression. Front. Immunol. 9, 794 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Lin, A. A., Wojciechowski, S. E. & Hildeman, D. A. Androgens suppress antigen-specific T cell responses and IFN-gamma production during intracranial LCMV infection. J. Neuroimmunol. 226, 8–19 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Zeng, F. et al. A comparison study of SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody between male and female COVID-19 patients: a possible reason underlying different outcome between sex. J. Med. Virol. (2020).

  83. Ou, X. et al. Characterization of spike glycoprotein of SARS-CoV-2 on virus entry and its immune cross-reactivity with SARS-CoV. Nat. Commun. 11, 1620 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Hoffmann, M. et al. SARS-CoV-2 cell entry depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and is blocked by a clinically proven protease inhibitor. Cell (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  85. Matsuyama, S. et al. Enhanced isolation of SARS-CoV-2 by TMPRSS2-expressing cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 7001–7003 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Knoops, K. et al. SARS-coronavirus replication is supported by a reticulovesicular network of modified endoplasmic reticulum. PLoS Biol. 6, e226 (2008).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. Sungnak, W. et al. SARS-CoV-2 entry factors are highly expressed in nasal epithelial cells together with innate immune genes. Nat. Med. 26, 681–687 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  88. Qi, F., Qian, S., Zhang, S. & Zhang, Z. Single cell RNA sequencing of 13 human tissues identify cell types and receptors of human coronaviruses. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 526, 135–140 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Wang, S., Zhou, X., Zhang, T. & Wang, Z. The need for urogenital tract monitoring in COVID-19. Nat. Rev. Urol. (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  90. Wang, Q. et al. A hierarchical network of transcription factors governs androgen receptor-dependent prostate cancer growth. Mol. Cell 27, 380–392 (2007).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  91. Sahu, B. et al. Dual role of FoxA1 in androgen receptor binding to chromatin, androgen signalling and prostate cancer. Embo J. 30, 3962–3976 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Yu, J. et al. An integrated network of androgen receptor, polycomb, and TMPRSS2-ERG gene fusions in prostate cancer progression. Cancer Cell 17, 443–454 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Massie, C. E. et al. The androgen receptor fuels prostate cancer by regulating central metabolism and biosynthesis. Embo J. 30, 2719–2733 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Sharma, N. L. et al. The androgen receptor induces a distinct transcriptional program in castration-resistant prostate cancer in man. Cancer Cell 23, 35–47 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Clinckemalie, L. et al. Androgen regulation of the TMPRSS2 gene and the effect of a SNP in an androgen response element. Mol. Endocrinol. 27, 2028–2040 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Demichelis, F. et al. TMPRSS2:ERG gene fusion associated with lethal prostate cancer in a watchful waiting cohort. Oncogene 26, 4596–4599 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Nam, R. K. et al. Expression of TMPRSS2:ERG gene fusion in prostate cancer cells is an important prognostic factor for cancer progression. Cancer Biol. Ther. 6, 40–45 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Tomlins, S. A. et al. Recurrent fusion of TMPRSS2 and ETS transcription factor genes in prostate cancer. Science 310, 644–648 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Soller, M. J. et al. Confirmation of the high frequency of the TMPRSS2/ERG fusion gene in prostate cancer. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 45, 717–719 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  100. Lucas, J. M. et al. The androgen-regulated protease TMPRSS2 activates a proteolytic cascade involving components of the tumor microenvironment and promotes prostate cancer metastasis. Cancer Discov. 4, 1310–1325 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  101. Luijten, M. N. H., Lee, J. X. T. & Crasta, K. C. Mutational game changer: chromothripsis and its emerging relevance to cancer. Mutat. Res. 777, 29–51 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Fraser, M. et al. Genomic hallmarks of localized, non-indolent prostate cancer. Nature 541, 359–364 (2017).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Baca, S. C. et al. Punctuated evolution of prostate cancer genomes. Cell 153, 666–677 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  104. Robinson, D. et al. Integrative clinical genomics of advanced prostate cancer. Cell 161, 1215–1228 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  105. Mani, R. S. et al. Inflammation-induced oxidative stress mediates gene fusion formation in prostate cancer. Cell Rep. 17, 2620–2631 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  106. Nguyen, D. P., Li, J. & Tewari, A. K. Inflammation and prostate cancer: the role of interleukin 6 (IL-6). BJU Int. 113, 986–992 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  107. Lu, H., Ouyang, W. & Huang, C. Inflammation, a key event in cancer development. Mol. Cancer Res. 4, 221–233 (2006).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  108. Lu, Y. et al. Monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1) acts as a paracrine and autocrine factor for prostate cancer growth and invasion. Prostate 66, 1311–1318 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  109. Conti, P. et al. Induction of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1 and IL-6) and lung inflammation by Coronavirus-19 (COVI-19 or SARS-CoV-2): anti-inflammatory strategies. J. Biol. Regul. Homeost. Agents (2020).

  110. Conti, P. et al. How to reduce the likelihood of coronavirus-19 (CoV-19 or SARS-CoV-2) infection and lung inflammation mediated by IL-1. J. Biol. Regul. Homeost. Agents (2020).

  111. Feldmann, M. et al. Trials of anti-tumour necrosis factor therapy for COVID-19 are urgently needed. Lancet 395, 1407–1409 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  112. Zhang, W. et al. Molecular and serological investigation of 2019-nCoV infected patients: implication of multiple shedding routes. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 9, 386–389 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  113. Li, D., Jin, M., Bao, P., Zhao, W. & Zhang, S. Clinical characteristics and results of semen tests among men with coronavirus disease 2019. JAMA Netw. Open 3, e208292 (2020).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  114. Sfanos, K. S., Yegnasubramanian, S., Nelson, W. G. & De Marzo, A. M. The inflammatory microenvironment and microbiome in prostate cancer development. Nat. Rev. Urol. 15, 11–24 (2018).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  115. Hikmet, F., Mear, L., Uhlén, M. & Lindskog, C. The protein expression profile of ACE2 in human tissues. bioRxiv (2020).

  116. Hamming, I. et al. Tissue distribution of ACE2 protein, the functional receptor for SARS coronavirus. A first step in understanding SARS pathogenesis. J. Pathol. 203, 631–637 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  117. Xu, X. et al. Effective treatment of severe COVID-19 patients with tocilizumab. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 10970–10975 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  118. Garde, D. STAT COVID-19 Drugs and Vaccines Tracker (2020).

  119. Wu, R. et al. An update on current therapeutic drugs treating COVID-19. Curr. Pharmacol. Rep. 1–15, (2020).

  120. Gilead Announces Results From Phase 3 Trial of Investigational Antiviral Remdesivir in Patients With Severe COVID-19 (2020).

  121. NIH News Release: NIH clinical trial shows Remdesivir accelerates recovery from advanced COVID-19 (2020).

  122. Grein, J. et al. Compassionate use of Remdesivir for patients with severe covid-19. N. Engl. J. Med. (2020).

  123. Zhavoronkov, A. Geroprotective and senoremediative strategies to reduce the comorbidity, infection rates, severity, and lethality in gerophilic and gerolavic infections. Aging (2020).

  124. Dyall, J. et al. Middle east respiratory syndrome and severe acute respiratory syndrome: current therapeutic options and potential targets for novel therapies. Drugs 77, 1935–1966 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  125. Wang, C. H. et al. Adjuvant treatment with a mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor, sirolimus, and steroids improves outcomes in patients with severe H1N1 pneumonia and acute respiratory failure. Crit. Care Med. 42, 313–321 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  126. Wang, M. et al. Remdesivir and chloroquine effectively inhibit the recently emerged novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in vitro. Cell Res. 30, 269–271 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  127. Guy, R. K., DiPaola, R. S., Romanelli, F. & Dutch, R. E. Rapid repurposing of drugs for COVID-19. Science (2020).

  128. Freedberg, D. E. et al. Famotidine use is associated with improved clinical outcomes in hospitalized COVID-19 patients: a retrospective cohort study. medRxiv (2020).

  129. Hung, I. F. et al. Triple combination of interferon beta-1b, lopinavir-ritonavir, and ribavirin in the treatment of patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19: an open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial. Lancet (2020).

  130. Le, T. T. et al. The COVID-19 vaccine development landscape. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 19, 305–306 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  131. Callaway, E. The race for coronavirus vaccines: a graphical guide. Nature 580, 576–577. (2020).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  132. Tseng, C. T. et al. Immunization with SARS coronavirus vaccines leads to pulmonary immunopathology on challenge with the SARS virus. PLoS ONE 7, e35421 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  133. Lurie, N., Saville, M., Hatchett, R. & Halton, J. Developing covid-19 vaccines at pandemic speed. N. Engl. J. Med. (2020).

  134. Gurwitz, D. Angiotensin receptor blockers as tentative SARS-CoV-2 therapeutics. Drug Dev. Res. (2020).

  135. Duga, S. et al. Impact of anti-androgenic therapies on COVID-19: an observational study in male population from a COVID-19 regional centre of Lombardy (Italy). medRxiv (2020).

  136. Stopsack, K. H., Mucci, L. A., Antonarakis, E. S., Nelson, P. S. & Kantoff, P. W. TMPRSS2 and COVID-19: serendipity or opportunity for intervention? Cancer Discov. (2020).

  137. Goren, A. et al. A preliminary observation: male pattern hair loss among hospitalized COVID-19 patients in Spain—a potential clue to the role of androgens in COVID-19 severity. J. Cosmet. Dermatol. (2020).

  138. VA launches clinical trial for Veterans with COVID-19 based on prostate cancer drug. Drug may help prevent virus from penetrating lung tissue (2020).

  139. Sharifi, N. & Ryan, C. J. Androgen hazards with COVID-19. Endocr. Relat. Cancer 27, E1–E3 (2020).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  140. Baratchian, M. et al. No evidence that androgen regulation of pulmonary TMPRSS2 explains sex-discordant COVID-19 outcomes. bioRxiv (2020).

  141. Mikkonen, L., Pihlajamaa, P., Sahu, B., Zhang, F. P. & Janne, O. A. Androgen receptor and androgen-dependent gene expression in lung. Mol. Cell Endocrinol. 317, 14–24 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  142. Kutikov, A. et al. A war on two fronts: cancer care in the time of COVID-19. Ann. Intern. Med. (2020).

  143. Shet, A., Ray, D., Malavige, N., Santosham, M. & Bar-Zeev, N. Differential COVID-19-attributable mortality and BCG vaccine use in countries. medRxiv (2020).

  144. Bloch, E. M. et al. Deployment of convalescent plasma for the prevention and treatment of COVID-19. J Clin Invest130, 2757–2765. (2020).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  145. Caskey, M. et al. Synthetic double-stranded RNA induces innate immune responses similar to a live viral vaccine in humans. J. Exp. Med. 208, 2357–2366 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  146. Saxena, M. et al. Poly-ICLC, a TLR3 agonist, induces transient innate immune responses in patients with treated HIV-infection: a randomized double-blinded placebo controlled trial. Front. Immunol. 10, 725 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  147. Kende, M., Paragas, J. & Salazar, A. M. The efficacy of poly-ICLC against Ebola-Zaire virus (EBOV) infection in mice and cynomolgus monkeys. Antivir. Res. 163, 179–184 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  148. Aravantinou, M. et al. PolyICLC exerts pro- and anti-HIV effects on the DC-T cell milieu in vitro and in vivo. PLoS ONE 11, e0161730 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  149. Wong, J. P. et al. Activation of toll-like receptor signaling pathway for protection against influenza virus infection. Vaccine 27, 3481–3483 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  150. Wong, J. P., Nagata, L. P., Christopher, M. E., Salazar, A. M. & Dale, R. M. Prophylaxis of acute respiratory virus infections using nucleic acid-based drugs. Vaccine 23, 2266–2268 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  151. Kumaki, Y., Salazar, A. M., Wandersee, M. K. & Barnard, D. L. Prophylactic and therapeutic intranasal administration with an immunomodulator, Hiltonol((R)) (Poly IC:LC), in a lethal SARS-CoV-infected BALB/c mouse model. Antivir. Res. 139, 1–12 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  152. COVID-19: Data Summary - NYC Health (2020).

  153. Franki, R. Comorbidities the rule in New York’s COVID-19 deaths (2020).

  154. The Hindu Data Team: COVID-19 has affected higher share of men in India, difference relatively lesser in other countries (2020).

  155. Chen, Y., Liu, Q. & Guo, D. Emerging coronaviruses: genome structure, replication, and pathogenesis. J. Med. Virol. 92, 418–423 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  156. Wrapp, D. et al. Cryo-EM structure of the 2019-nCoV spike in the prefusion conformation. Science 367, 1260–1263 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  157. Schoeman, D. & Fielding, B. C. Coronavirus envelope protein: current knowledge. Virol. J. 16, 69 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  158. Chen, J. Pathogenicity and transmissibility of 2019-nCoV-A quick overview and comparison with other emerging viruses. Microbes Infect. 22, 69–71 (2020).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  159. Iwata-Yoshikawa, N. et al. TMPRSS2 Contributes to Virus Spread and Immunopathology in the Airways of Murine Models after Coronavirus Infection. J. Virol. 93, (2019).

  160. Siddiqi, H. K. & Mehra, M. R. COVID-19 illness in native and immunosuppressed states: a clinical-therapeutic staging proposal. J. Heart Lung Transpl. 39, 405–407 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors wish to thank Dr. Babu Padanilam, University of Nebraska Medical Center, for critical reading of this manuscript, and Ms. Sima Rabinowitz for editing the manuscript. This work was supported in part through the computational and data resources and staff expertise provided by Scientific Computing at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai. The authors wish to acknowledge funding support from the Deane Prostate Health, ISMMS and The Arthur M. Blank Family Foundation to AT. Figs. 1, 2, 4 and 5, either in part or whole, were exported under paid subscription and created with Credit line and the Copyright notice for Adobe stock images: Fig. 2—Coronavirus illustration; © chakisatelier/Adobe Stock. Figure 3—Prostate and male anatomy illustration; © VectorMine/Adobe Stock, Prostate cancer illustration; © peterjunaidy/Adobe Stock, Coronavirus illustration; © chakisatelier/Adobe Stock. Figure 4—Prostate cancer illustration; © ellepigrafica/Adobe Stock, Coronavirus illustration; © chakisatelier/Adobe Stock. Figure 5—Coronavirus illustration; © chakisatelier/Adobe Stock.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



D.C., S.S.N., and A.K.T. conceived the idea and developed the conceptual framework. D.C., S.S.N., N.K., N.H., and A.K.T. wrote the main manuscript. D.L. contributed unpublished data, for COVID-19 positive prostate cancer patients. All authors (D.C., S.S.N., N.H., P.R., Y.M.G., V.W., N.M., D.L., Z.D., N.K., and A.K.T.) contributed to literature search and provided critical feedback. S.S.N., D.C., and A.K.T. prepared the Figures. P.R. prepared the Tables. All authors reviewed and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Dimple Chakravarty, Sujit S. Nair or Ashutosh K. Tewari.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chakravarty, D., Nair, S.S., Hammouda, N. et al. Sex differences in SARS-CoV-2 infection rates and the potential link to prostate cancer. Commun Biol 3, 374 (2020).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing