Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

How will marine plastic pollution affect bacterial primary producers?

We demonstrated in our recent Communications Biology paper how marine photosynthetic bacteria, Prochlorococcus, are adversely affected by leachates from commonly used plastics. This study was one of the first to consider how substances leaching from plastics may affect marine primary producers and demonstrated that plastic pollution has the potential to negatively impact a wider range of organisms than previously appreciated. We outline here key outstanding questions regarding how ocean plastic pollution may impact small, but essential, marine microbes and discuss how these can be addressed.

Plastic pollution affects creatures great and small

It is now well recognised that marine plastic pollution threatens fish, bird and mammal species around the world. Images of animals entangled in plastic debris or stomachs filled with plastic pieces have helped galvanise scientific and public interest in this critical, worldwide issue. However, relatively few studies have considered how marine plastic pollution may affect the smallest life in our oceans, marine microbes (Fig. 1). Such microorganisms are critical to the marine food web, photosynthetic primary production and biogeochemical cycling.

Fig. 1
figure1

Current knowledge and key outstanding questions regarding the potential impacts of plastic pollution on marine bacteria.

When marine plastic pollution research has considered microorganisms, the focus has largely been on looking at what colonises and biodegrades plastic debris (reviewed recently by Jacquin et al.1). From these types of studies is appears that certain groups of bacteria will tolerate, and perhaps even benefit from marine plastics debris. Such findings are important and investigating bacteria with degradative capabilities may eventually result in improved technologies and processes for dealing with plastic waste2. However, focusing predominantly on these aspects can result in overly simplified appraisals of how bacteria may be affected by marine plastics. In a recent review that evaluated ecosystem impacts of marine plastics on different biota, bacterial diversity and/or abundance was assessed as being positively impacted by plastics, with this assessment scored as having good confidence3. Where the composition of bacterial communities colonising plastics have been examined, however, there is considerable variability in how well different bacterial families colonise common polymer types4. It is also clear that the bacterial taxa which predominate in biofilms on plastic in marine waters are distinctly different to those residing in the surrounding seawater5, indicating that planktonic marine bacterial lineages are not the main groups benefiting from plastics as a new potential niche.

The negative impact of marine plastics has largely been linked to plastic ingestion or entanglement, which marine bacteria are too small to suffer from, but this is not the only way by which plastic pollution may affect marine biota. In addition to providing a surface to colonize, plastics can also leach a variety of compounds. Plastics may provide some dissolved organic carbon sources for some bacteria to metabolise6,7 but they can also leach organic compounds and metals that negatively impact growth of a variety of microorganisms, including marine larvae8,9 and algae10. Most plastic items are manufactured using a variety of additives, such as UV stabilisers, plasticizers, metals, dyes and flame retardants11. These substances which are not chemically bound to the polymer can leach from plastic items and end up in the environment, an issue which is now the subject of increased investigation (reviewed in ref. 12). In our Communications Biology paper, we looked to expand our understanding of the breadth of possible marine plastic impacts by investigating how Prochlorococcus, an abundant, ecologically important bacterial primary producer, is affected by exposure to leachates from common plastics13.

Plastics and Prochlorococcus don’t mix

In many regions of the world’s oceans Prochlorococcus are present in vast numbers, carrying out photosynthesis and oxygen production on an impressive scale. Prochlorococcus is perhaps the most plentiful photosynthetic organism on Earth, with an estimated yearly abundance of around 3 octillion (~1027) individuals14. These tiny, abundant bacterial primary producers help support the marine food chain and contribute substantially to global carbon fixation and oxygen production15.

In open ocean environments where Prochlorococcus are most numerous, plastic pollution is now recognised as a potential cause for concern16. To determine whether the chemicals leaching from such plastics might impact bacteria, as well as larger sea life we investigated the impact of plastic leachate on two different groups of Prochlorococcus that are found at different depths within the surface lit layers of the oceans. What we found was that both groups were unable to grow, photosynthesise or produce oxygen when high levels of leachates from two common plastics were added to their artificial seawater growth media13.

When cells were exposed to lower amounts of leachate, the two different Prochlorococcus strains differed in their sensitivity. This suggests some Prochlorococcus groups, and likely other bacteria, may vary in their capacity to tolerate exposure to plastic pollution. Thus, there may be “winners and losers” in ocean regions which accumulate high levels of plastic debris.

To tease apart potential reasons for the strain-specific responses to leachate exposure, our study also used whole genome RNA sequencing to look at gene transcription-level responses. Each strain was observed to respond to plastic leachate exposure with differential transcription of a substantially different suite of genes. One common feature in the response, however, was the reduction in the transcription of genes encoding key enzymes involved with photosynthetic carbon fixation. This, together with the observed reduction in photosynthetic oxygen production at sub-lethal leachate levels, suggests that photosynthesis in some marine bacteria may be particularly susceptible to the effects of plastic leachate exposure.

Considering the community

Moving forward, it will be important to look at the effects of plastic-associated toxicants at the community level. Considerable work has been done with respect to microbial community composition within the “plastisphere”17, but to our knowledge there are no published studies examining the effects of plastic leachates on seawater microbial communities. In addition to expanding the set of organisms for which there is information on plastic leachate responsivity, community level analyses are important as the response of specific microbes may be influenced by the composition of the wider community. For instance, if some microbes are able to metabolise some of the leached chemicals18, then the more sensitive community members may be able to survive exposure to plastic leachates that may have otherwise impacted their fitness. Additionally, if sensitive microbes die quickly, then new bioavailable organic matter may provide an additional food source, stimulating growth of less sensitive microbes and resulting in indirect changes in community structure. Microcosm experiments have been used previously to investigate the impact of other pollutants, such as herbicides and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, on marine phytoplankton communities19,20. We are using a similar approach to investigate the effect of plastic leachates on marine microbial communities from coastal and open ocean waters in order to determine how members of mixed communities respond in terms of photosynthetic capacity, population growth and changes in community structure.

Do weathered plastics retain their toxicity?

To better understand how plastic waste in the environment is likely to affect marine bacteria we must also begin to consider how weathering affects leachate toxicity. Plastics may take hundreds to thousands of years to degrade in the environment21, however little is known regarding leaching dynamics and potential toxicity over months or years, let alone longer time frames. Almost all of the studies which have investigated leachate toxicity have focused on the effects of newly purchased, unused plastics as a first step in investigating potential impacts, including our initial study. One exception is the work of Bejgarn et al.22, which compared toxicity of new plastics with equivalent materials which had been artificially weathered, using the copepod Nitocra sinipes. This work reported that toxicity of some tested polymers was altered by simulated weathering (UV irradiation), with toxicity increasing for some products following irradiation, whereas other materials showed a decrease or no change in their toxicity. These findings highlight the potential for environmental exposure to alter toxicity and the need to investigate how estuarine or marine weathering processes may affect leachate toxicity. Recent work by Kedzierski and colleagues analysed the desorption and absorption phenomena for three different plastic types over more than a year of immersion in marine waters and examined changes in cytotoxicity of plastics during this period of weathering23. They reported both desorption and adsorption of different organic and inorganic substances, including some endocrine disruptors, over this time, with results varying for different plastic items and polymer types23. We are now looking at how estuarine weathering of plastic items affects leachate toxicity to gain a clearer picture of how environmental plastic pollution impacts may be altered by the degree of weathering.

Can we identify the substances responsible for leachate toxicity?

Our present understanding of the potential biotic impacts of plastic leachates would also benefit from identification of the specific substances within leachates that are contributing to toxicity. Early ecotoxicological investigations into leachate toxicity found that different plastic items varied considerably in their toxicity, even when the base polymer was the same24. This is likely due to the complexity and variability in the precise set of additives which go into the manufacture of different items. Toxicity Identification Evaluation (TIE) testing methods can be applied to gain information on the likely classes of toxicants24. However, identifying the precise inorganic and/or organic components that contribute to toxicity requires follow-up investigations. This can be particularly problematic with organic components, as leachate from a single item may contain very large numbers of different organic substances and their breakdown products, many of which are difficult to precisely identify.

From our initial study, we were able to see that HDPE bags and PVC matting leached a complex mixture of organic compounds, with PVC containing a more diverse set of components, with tentative identification only possible for a very small fraction of these. Both plastics also leached inorganic metals, with zinc observed at particularly high levels, especially in the PVC product. Zinc is a common component of heat stabilisers, fillers and colourants used in plastic manufacture, and has been reported as an important component in previous leachate studies, particularly those involving PVC materials8,10. Leachate components such as zinc, which are abundant and widely used in plastic manufacture, are potential targets for future studies focusing on how specific additives contribute to toxicity to various biota. Such studies have been undertaken on other specific known plastic additives, such as recent work investigating the toxicity of fluorescent additives to microalgae25. Efforts to determine which chemical additives contribute substantially to toxicity may help facilitate development of plastic products that leach fewer or lower concentrations of toxic substances.

Conclusions

Analytical advances in microbiology and molecular biology have helped to highlight the importance of microorganisms in all global processes including the cycling of carbon and oxygen production. Considering key microbes, such as photosynthetic marine bacteria, in efforts to monitor and assess environmental pollutants will help provide a more comprehensive picture of the ecosystem level impacts of such stressors. Our study on Prochlorococcus was a first step in this direction and subsequent studies involving a wider range of microorganisms, as well as considering microbial communities are now needed. Addressing the problem of marine plastic pollution requires research across many fields: from biological investigations into the breadth of biotic impacts and chemical analyses of weathering processes through to modelling the sources and movement of plastic pollution and engineering solutions for improved manufacturing and better handling of plastic waste. Understanding how plastic pollution affects marine bacteria is an important component of such efforts to predict and mitigate the impact of plastic pollution on our oceans.

References

  1. 1.

    Jacquin, J. et al. Microbial ecotoxicology of marine plastic debris: a review on colonization and biodegradation by the ‘plastisphere’. Front. Microbiol. 10, 347 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Danso, D., Chow, J. & Streit, W. R. Plastics: environmental and biotechnological perspectives on microbial degradation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 85, 768–14 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Beaumont, N. J. et al. Global ecological, social and economic impacts of marine plastic. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 142, 189–195 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Pinto, M., Langer, T. M., Hüffer, T., Hofmann, T. & Herndl, G. J. The composition of bacterial communities associated with plastic biofilms differs between different polymers and stages of biofilm succession. PLoS ONE 14, e0217165 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Bryant, J. A. et al. Diversity and activity of communities inhabiting plastic debris in the North Pacific Gyre. mSystems 1, 10239 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Galgani, L. & Loiselle, S. A. Plastic accumulation in the sea surface microlayer: an experiment-based perspective for future studies. Geoscience 9, 66 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Romera-Castillo, C., Pinto, M., Langer, T. M., Álvarez-Salgado, X. A. & Herndl, G. J. Dissolved organic carbon leaching from plastics stimulates microbial activity in the ocean. Nat. Commun. 9, 1596 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Lithner, D., Nordensvan, I. & Dave, G. Comparative acute toxicity of leachates from plastic products made of polypropylene, polyethylene, PVC, acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene, and epoxy to Daphnia magna. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res 19, 1763–1772 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Li, H.-X. et al. Effects of toxic leachate from commercial plastics on larval survival and settlement of the barnacle Amphibalanus amphitrite. Environ. Sci. Technol. 50, 924–931 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Capolupo, M., Sørensen, L., Jayasena, K. D. R., Booth, A. M. & Fabbri, E. Chemical composition and ecotoxicity of plastic and car tire rubber leachates to aquatic organisms. Water Res. 169, 115270 (2020).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Hahladakis, J. N., Velis, C. A., Weber, R., Iacovidou, E. & Purnell, P. An overview of chemical additives present in plastics: migration, release, fate and environmental impact during their use, disposal and recycling. J. Hazard. Mater. 344, 179–199 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Hermabessiere, L. et al. Occurrence and effects of plastic additives on marine environments and organisms: a review. Chemosphere 182, 781–793 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Tetu, S. G. et al. Plastic leachates impair growth and oxygen production in Prochlorococcus, the ocean’s most abundant photosynthetic bacteria. Commun. Biol. 2, 2–9 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Flombaum, P. et al. Present and future global distributions of the marine Cyanobacteria Prochlorococcus and Synechococcus. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 9824–9829 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Biller, S. J., Berube, P. M., Lindell, D. & Chisholm, S. W. Prochlorococcus: the structure and function of collective diversity. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 13, 13–27 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Lebreton, L. et al. Evidence that the Great Pacific garbage patch is rapidly accumulating plastic. Sci. Rep. 8, e1700782 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Zettler, E. R., Mincer, T. J. & Amaral-Zettler, L. A. Life in the ‘Plastisphere’: microbial communities on plastic marine debris. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47, 7137–7146 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Syranidou, E. et al. Development of tailored indigenous marine consortia for the degradation of naturally weathered polyethylene films. PLoS ONE 12, e0183984 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Stachowski-Haberkorn, S. et al. Impact of Roundup on the marine microbial community, as shown by an in situ microcosm experiment. Aquat. Toxicol. 89, 232–241 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Ben Othman, H., Lanouguère, É., Got, P., Sakka Hlaili, A. & Leboulanger, C. Structural and functional responses of coastal marine phytoplankton communities to PAH mixtures. Chemosphere 209, 908–919 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Barnes, D. K. A., Galgani, F., Thompson, R. C. & Barlaz, M. Accumulation and fragmentation of plastic debris in global environments. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 364, 1985–1998 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Bejgarn, S., MacLeod, M., Bogdal, C. & Breitholtz, M. Toxicity of leachate from weathering plastics: an exploratory screening study with Nitocra spinipes. Chemosphere 132, 114–119 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Kedzierski, M. et al. Threat of plastic ageing in marine environment. Adsorption/desorption of micropollutants. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 127, 684–694 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Lithner, D., Damberg, J., Dave, G. & Larsson, Å. Leachates from plastic consumer products—screening for toxicity with Daphnia magna. Chemosphere 74, 1195–1200 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Luo, H. et al. Leaching behavior of fluorescent additives from microplastics and the toxicity of leachate to Chlorella vulgaris. Sci. Total Environ. 678, 1–9 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was primarily supported by Australian Research Council fellowship to S.G.T. (#DE150100009). We thank Dr. Focardi for assistance with community composition experiments.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

S.G.T. conceived the article and S.G.T., I.S. and L.M. contributed to writing the article.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sasha G. Tetu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tetu, S.G., Sarker, I. & Moore, L.R. How will marine plastic pollution affect bacterial primary producers?. Commun Biol 3, 55 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-020-0789-4

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing