Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Selective production of ethylene glycol at high rate via cascade catalysis

Abstract

Ethylene glycol is currently produced via an energy-intensive two-step thermocatalytic process that results in substantial CO2 emissions. Sustainable ethylene glycol production via ethylene electro-oxidation powered by renewable electricity is desirable; however, direct ethylene electro-oxidation suffers from unsatisfactory product selectivity, particularly at high production rates. Here we report a cascade strategy for efficient and selective production of pure ethylene glycol solution under ambient conditions with no detectable by-product formation. Specifically, ethylene is converted to ethylene glycol on a catalyst/solid-acid composite using electrochemically generated hydrogen peroxide as the oxidant. Using an integrated solid-electrolyte reactor, we achieved high electron utilization efficiency of 60–70% at industrially relevant current densities (100–500 mA cm−2) for ethylene glycol production with full product selectivity (~100%). We further integrated this system with a CO2 electroreduction reactor and demonstrated the sustainable production of pure ethylene glycol using CO2 and water as the only feedstocks.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Schematic comparisons of ethylene glycol production pathways.
Fig. 2: Ethylene glycol production via cascade catalysis.
Fig. 3: Mechanistic studies of the cascade catalytic system.
Fig. 4: Cascade production of pure ethylene glycol solution.
Fig. 5: Catalyst and system optimization towards more practical applications.
Fig. 6: Cascade ethylene glycol production from CO2.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available in the supplementary source data, and can also be obtained from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

  1. Lum, Y. et al. Tuning OH binding energy enables selective electrochemical oxidation of ethylene to ethylene glycol. Nat. Catal. 3, 14–22 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Yue, H., Zhao, Y., Ma, X. & Gong, J. Ethylene glycol: properties, synthesis, and applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 41, 4218–4244 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Energy Efficiency and GHG Emissions: Prospective Scenarios for the Chemical and Petrochemical Industry (European Commission, Joint Research Centre, 2017).

  4. Qian, H. et al. The comparative life-cycle environmental effects of chemical feedstock change driven by energy system transition: a case study from China’s ethylene glycol industry. J. Clean. Prod. 355, 131764 (2022).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Rebsdat, S. & Mayer, D. in Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry Vol. 13 (eds Rebsdat, S. & Mayer, D.) 531–546 (John Wiley, 2000).

  6. Chu, S., Cui, Y. & Liu, N. The path towards sustainable energy. Nat. Mater. 16, 16–22 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. De Luna, P. et al. What would it take for renewably powered electrosynthesis to displace petrochemical processes? Science 364, eaav3506 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Zheng, T. et al. Upcycling CO2 into energy-rich long-chain compounds via electrochemical and metabolic engineering. Nat. Catal. 5, 388–396 (2022).

  9. Ko, M. et al. Direct propylene epoxidation with oxygen using a photo-electro-heterogeneous catalytic system. Nat. Catal. 5, 37–44 (2022).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ke, J. et al. Facet-dependent electrooxidation of propylene into propylene oxide over Ag3PO4 crystals. Nat. Commun. 13, 932 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Li, F. et al. Cooperative CO2-to-ethanol conversion via enriched intermediates at molecule–metal catalyst interfaces. Nat. Catal. 3, 75–82 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sullivan, I. et al. Coupling electrochemical CO2 conversion with CO2 capture. Nat. Catal. 4, 952–958 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gu, Z., Shen, H., Chen, Z., Xu, X. & Zheng, G. Efficient electrocatalytic CO2 reduction to C2+ alcohols at defect-site-rich Cu surface. Joule 5, 429–440 (2021).

  14. Bushuyev, O. S. et al. What should we make with CO2 and how can we make it? Joule 2, 825–832 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang, Y., Han, P., Lv, X., Zhang, L. & Zheng, G. Defect and interface engineering for aqueous electrocatalytic CO2 reduction. Joule 2, 2551–2582 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Leow, W. R. et al. Chloride-mediated selective electrosynthesis of ethylene and propylene oxides at high current density. Science 368, 1228–1233 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Li, Y. et al. Redox-mediated electrosynthesis of ethylene oxide from CO2 and water. Nat. Catal. 5, 185–192 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Figueiredo, M. C. Towards the sustainable synthesis of ethylene glycol. Nat. Catal. 3, 4–5 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Dahms, H. & Bockris, J. O. The relative electrocatalytic activity of noble metals in the oxidation of ethylene. J. Electrochem. Soc. 111, 728 (1964).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ko, M. et al. Unassisted solar lignin valorisation using a compartmented photo-electro-biochemical cell. Nat. Commun. 10, 5123 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhu, P. & Wang, H. High-purity and high-concentration liquid fuels through CO2 electroreduction. Nat. Catal. 4, 943–951 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Xia, C., Xia, Y., Zhu, P., Fan, L. & Wang, H. Direct electrosynthesis of pure aqueous H2O2 solutions up to 20% by weight using a solid electrolyte. Science 366, 226–231 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Chen, J. & Wang, L. Effects of the catalyst dynamic changes and influence of the reaction environment on the performance of electrochemical CO2 reduction. Adv. Mater. 34, 2103900 (2022).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang, X. et al. Electrochemical oxygen reduction to hydrogen peroxide at practical rates in strong acidic media. Nat. Commun. 13, 2880 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Jung, E. et al. Atomic-level tuning of Co–N–C catalyst for high-performance electrochemical H2O2 production. Nat. Mater. 19, 436–442 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lu, Z. et al. High-efficiency oxygen reduction to hydrogen peroxide catalysed by oxidized carbon materials. Nat. Catal. 1, 156–162 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Gordon, C. P. et al. Efficient epoxidation over dinuclear sites in titanium silicalite-1. Nature 586, 708–713 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lewis, R. J. et al. Highly efficient catalytic production of oximes from ketones using in situ–generated H2O2. Science 376, 615–620 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lu, X., Zhou, W.-J., Wu, H., Liebens, A. & Wu, P. Selective synthesis of ethylene oxide through liquid-phase epoxidation of ethylene with titanosilicate/H2O2 catalytic systems. Appl. Catal. Gen. 515, 51–59 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Alvear, M. et al. Continuous liquid-phase epoxidation of ethylene with hydrogen peroxide on a titanium-silicate catalyst. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 60, 9429–9436 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Yang, Z.-J. et al. Layered niobic acid with self-exfoliatable nanosheets and adjustable acidity for catalytic hydration of ethylene oxide. J. Catal. 280, 247–254 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Lu, X. et al. One-pot synthesis of ethylene glycol by oxidative hydration of ethylene with hydrogen peroxide over titanosilicate catalysts. J. Catal. 358, 89–99 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Khouw, C. B. & Davis, M. E. Catalytic activity of titanium silicates synthesized in the presence of alkali-metal and alkaline-earth ions. J. Catal. 151, 77–86 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Perry, S. C. et al. Electrochemical synthesis of hydrogen peroxide from water and oxygen. Nat. Rev. Chem. 3, 442–458 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Hammond, C. & Tarantino, G. Switching off H2O2 decomposition during TS-1 catalysed epoxidation via post-synthetic active site modification. Catalysts 5, 2309–2323 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Fan, L., Xia, C., Zhu, P., Lu, Y. & Wang, H. Electrochemical CO2 reduction to high-concentration pure formic acid solutions in an all-solid-state reactor. Nat. Commun. 11, 3633 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Yang, Q., Yang, Q., Xu, S., Zhu, S. & Zhang, D. Technoeconomic and environmental analysis of ethylene glycol production from coal and natural gas compared with oil-based production. J. Clean. Prod. 273, 123120 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Fan, L. et al. Proton sponge promotion of electrochemical CO2 reduction to multi-carbon products. Joule 6, 205–220 (2022).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Chen, J. et al. Directing oxygen reduction reaction selectivity towards hydrogen peroxide via electric double layer engineering. Nanoscale 15, 3832–3840 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the National University of Singapore, Ministry of Education for its financial support, through grants A-0009176-02-00 and A-0009176-03-00. L.W. acknowledges support by the National Research Foundation (NRF) Singapore, under its NRF Fellowship (NRF-NRFF13-2021-0007), and the A*STAR (Agency for Science, Technology and Research) under its LCERFI programme award number U2102d2002. We thank A. Wong and H. Yukun for the help with the gas chromatography measurements.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

L.W. supervised the project. L.W. and L.F. conceived the project. L.F. and L.W. designed the experiments. L.F. carried out the catalyst performance evaluation and the physical characterizations with the help of L.C., Junmei Chen, H.Y., Y.X., T.Z., Jingyi Chen and Jiayi Chen. Jiayi Chen drew the schematic illustration in Fig. 1. Y.Z. performed the technoeconomic analysis. L.F. and L.W. analysed the data and prepared the manuscript. All the authors discussed the results and assisted during the manuscript preparation.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lei Wang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Catalysis thanks Mahinder Ramdin and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figs. 1–45, Notes 1–6, Tables 1 and 2, and references 1–35.

Source data

Source Data Fig. 2

Source data Fig. 2.

Source Data Fig. 3

Source data Fig. 3.

Source Data Fig. 4

Source data Fig. 4.

Source Data Fig. 5

Source data Fig. 5.

Source Data Fig. 6

Source data Fig. 6.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fan, L., Zhao, Y., Chen, L. et al. Selective production of ethylene glycol at high rate via cascade catalysis. Nat Catal 6, 585–595 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41929-023-00977-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41929-023-00977-6

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing