Article | Published:

Single platinum atoms immobilized on an MXene as an efficient catalyst for the hydrogen evolution reaction

Nature Catalysisvolume 1pages985992 (2018) | Download Citation


Single-atom catalysts offer a pathway to cost-efficient catalysis using the minimal amount of precious metals. However, preparing and keeping them stable during operation remains a challenge. Here we report the synthesis of double transition metal MXene nanosheets—Mo2TiC2Tx, with abundant exposed basal planes and Mo vacancies in the outer layers—by electrochemical exfoliation, enabled by the interaction between protons and the surface functional groups of Mo2TiC2Tx. The as-formed Mo vacancies are used to immobilize single Pt atoms, enhancing the MXene’s catalytic activity for the hydrogen evolution reaction. The developed catalyst exhibits a high catalytic ability with low overpotentials of 30 and 77 mV to achieve 10 and 100 mA cm−2 and a mass activity about 40 times greater than the commercial platinum-on-carbon catalyst. The strong covalent interactions between positively charged Pt single atoms and the MXene contribute to the exceptional catalytic performance and stability.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.


  1. 1.

    Zou, X. & Zhang, Y. Noble metal-free hydrogen evolution catalysts for water splitting. Chem. Soc. Rev. 44, 5148–5180 (2015).

  2. 2.

    Niether, C. et al. Improved water electrolysis using magnetic heating of FeC–Ni core–shell nanoparticles. Nat. Energy 3, 476–483 (2018).

  3. 3.

    Liu, Y. et al. Self-optimizing, highly surface-active layered metal dichalcogenide catalysts for hydrogen evolution. Nat. Energy 2, 17127 (2017).

  4. 4.

    Chen, C. et al. Highly crystalline multimetallic nanoframes with three-dimensional electrocatalytic surfaces. Science 343, 1339–1343 (2014).

  5. 5.

    Morales-Guio, C. G., Stern, L.-A. & Hu, X. Nanostructured hydrotreating catalysts for electrochemical hydrogen evolution. Chem. Soc. Rev. 43, 6555–6569 (2014).

  6. 6.

    Jones, J. et al. Thermally stable single-atom platinum-on-ceria catalysts via atom trapping. Science 353, 150–154 (2016).

  7. 7.

    Cheng, N. et al. Platinum single-atom and cluster catalysis of the hydrogen evolution reaction. Nat. Commun. 7, 13638 (2016).

  8. 8.

    Deng, J. et al. Triggering the electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution activity of the inert two-dimensional MoS2 surface via single-atom metal doping. Energy Environ. Sci. 8, 1594–1601 (2015).

  9. 9.

    Li, X. et al. Single-atom Pt as co-catalyst for enhanced photocatalytic H2 evolution. Adv. Mater. 28, 2427–2431 (2016).

  10. 10.

    Lin, L. et al. Low-temperature hydrogen production from water and methanol using Pt/α-MoC catalysts. Nature 544, 80–83 (2017).

  11. 11.

    Zhang, Z. et al. Thermally stable single atom Pt/m-Al2O3 for selective hydrogenation and CO oxidation. Nat. Commun. 8, 16100 (2017).

  12. 12.

    Zhang, L., Han, L., Liu, H., Liu, X. & Luo, J. Potential-cycling synthesis of single platinum atoms for efficient hydrogen evolution in neutral media. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56, 13694–13698 (2017).

  13. 13.

    Qiao, B. et al. Single-atom catalysis of CO oxidation using Pt1/FeOx. Nat. Chem. 3, 634–641 (2011).

  14. 14.

    Li, H. et al. Synergetic interaction between neighbouring platinum monomers in CO2 hydrogenation. Nat. Nanotech. 13, 411–417 (2018).

  15. 15.

    Gao, C., Wang, J., Xu, H. & Xiong, Y. Coordination chemistry in the design of heterogeneous photocatalysts. Chem. Soc. Rev. 46, 2799–2823 (2017).

  16. 16.

    Yang, H. B. et al. Atomically dispersed Ni(I) as the active site for electrochemical CO2 reduction. Nat. Energy 3, 140–147 (2018).

  17. 17.

    Liu, G. et al. MoS2 monolayer catalyst doped with isolated Co atoms for the hydrodeoxygenation reaction. Nat. Chem. 9, 810–816 (2017).

  18. 18.

    Fei, H. et al. General synthesis and definitive structural identification of MN4C4 single-atom catalysts with tunable electrocatalytic activities. Nat. Catal. 1, 63–72 (2018).

  19. 19.

    Yang, X.-F. et al. Single-atom catalysts: a new frontier in heterogeneous catalysis. Acc. Chem. Res. 46, 1740–1748 (2013).

  20. 20.

    Zhang, C. et al. Single-atomic ruthenium catalytic sites on nitrogen-doped graphene for oxygen reduction reaction in acidic medium. ACS Nano 11, 6930–6941 (2017).

  21. 21.

    Yang, M. et al. Catalytically active Au-O(OH)x-species stabilized by alkali ions on zeolites and mesoporous oxides. Science 346, 1498–1501 (2014).

  22. 22.

    Liu, P. et al. Photochemical route for synthesizing atomically dispersed palladium catalysts. Science 352, 797–800 (2016).

  23. 23.

    Wan, J. et al. Defect effects on TiO2 nanosheets: stabilizing single atomic site Au and promoting catalytic properties. Adv. Mater. 30, 1705369 (2018).

  24. 24.

    Anasori, B., Lukatskaya, M. R. & Gogotsi, Y. 2D metal carbides and nitrides (MXenes) for energy storage. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2, 16098 (2017).

  25. 25.

    Shahzad, F. et al. Electromagnetic interference shielding with 2D transition metal carbides (MXenes). Science 353, 1137–1140 (2016).

  26. 26.

    Naguib, M. et al. New two-dimensional niobium and vanadium carbides as promising materials for Li-ion batteries. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 15966–15969 (2013).

  27. 27.

    Xie, X. et al. Porous heterostructured MXene/carbon nanotube composite paper with high volumetric capacity for sodium-based energy storage devices. Nano Energy 26, 513–523 (2016).

  28. 28.

    Liang, X., Garsuch, A. & Nazar, L. F. Sulfur cathodes based on conductive MXene nanosheets for high-performance lithium-sulfur batteries. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54, 3907–3911 (2015).

  29. 29.

    Lukatskaya, M. R. et al. Cation intercalation and high volumetric capacitance of two-dimensional titanium carbide. Science 341, 1502–1505 (2013).

  30. 30.

    Ma, T. Y., Cao, J. L., Jaroniec, M. & Qiao, S. Z. Interacting carbon nitride and titanium carbide nanosheets for high-performance oxygen evolution. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55, 1138–1142 (2016).

  31. 31.

    Seh, Z. W. et al. Two-dimensional molybdenum carbide (MXene) as an efficient electrocatalyst for hydrogen evolution. ACS Energy Lett. 1, 589–594 (2016).

  32. 32.

    An, X. et al. The synergetic effect of Ti3C2 MXene and Pt as co-catalysts for highly efficient photocatalytic hydrogen evolution over g-C3N4. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 20, 11405–11411 (2018).

  33. 33.

    Pandey, M. & Thygesen, K. S. Two-dimensional MXenes as catalysts for electrochemical hydrogen evolution: a computational screening study. J. Phys. Chem. C 121, 13593–13598 (2017).

  34. 34.

    Satheeshkumar, E. et al. One-step solution processing of Ag, Au and Pd@MXene hybrids for SERS. Sci. Rep. 6, 32049 (2016).

  35. 35.

    Ming, M. et al. Promoted effect of alkalization on the catalytic performance of Rh/alk-Ti3C2X2 (XO, F) for the hydrodechlorination of chlorophenols in base-free aqueous medium. Appl. Catal. B 210, 462–469 (2017).

  36. 36.

    Li, Z. et al. Reactive metal–support interactions at moderate temperature in two-dimensional niobium-carbide-supported platinum catalysts. Nat. Catal. 1, 349–355 (2018).

  37. 37.

    Karlsson, L. H., Birch, J., Halim, J., Barsoum, M. W. & Persson, P. O. Atomically resolved structural and chemical investigation of single MXene sheets. Nano Lett. 15, 4955–4960 (2015).

  38. 38.

    Tao, Q. et al. Two-dimensional Mo1.33C MXene with divacancy ordering prepared from parent 3D laminate with in-plane chemical ordering. Nat. Commun. 8, 14949 (2017).

  39. 39.

    Hunt, S. T., Milina, M., Wang, Z. & Román-Leshkov, Y. Activating earth-abundant electrocatalysts for efficient, low-cost hydrogen evolution/oxidation: sub-monolayer platinum coatings on titanium tungsten carbide nanoparticles. Energy Environ. Sci. 9, 3290–3301 (2016).

  40. 40.

    Huang, X. et al. High-performance transition metal-doped Pt3Ni octahedra for oxygen reduction reaction. Science 348, 1230–1234 (2015).

  41. 41.

    Gao, G., O’Mullane, A. P. & Du, A. 2D MXenes: a new family of promising catalysts for the hydrogen evolution reaction. ACS Catal. 7, 494–500 (2016).

  42. 42.

    Ling, C., Shi, L., Ouyang, Y. & Wang, J. Searching for highly active catalysts for hydrogen evolution reaction based on O-terminated MXenes through a simple descriptor. Chem. Mater. 28, 9026–9032 (2016).

  43. 43.

    Liu, Y. et al. Low overpotential in vacancy-rich ultrathin CoSe2 nanosheets for water oxidation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 15670–15675 (2014).

  44. 44.

    Lian, P. et al. Alkalized Ti3C2 MXene nanoribbons with expanded interlayer spacing for high-capacity sodium and potassium ion batteries. Nano Energy 40, 1–8 (2017).

  45. 45.

    Stamenkovic, V. R. et al. Improved oxygen reduction activity on Pt3Ni(111) via increased surface site availability. Science 315, 493–497 (2007).

  46. 46.

    Tavakkoli, M. et al. Electrochemical activation of single-walled carbon nanotubes with pseudo-atomic-scale platinum for the hydrogen evolution reaction. ACS Catal. 7, 3121–3130 (2017).

  47. 47.

    Zhang, H. et al. Dynamic traction of lattice-confined platinum atoms into mesoporous carbon matrix for hydrogen evolution reaction. Sci. Adv. 4, eaao6657 (2018).

  48. 48.

    Nørskov, J. K. et al. Trends in the exchange current for hydrogen evolution. J. Electrochem. Soc. 152, J23–J26 (2005).

  49. 49.

    Blöchl, P. E. Projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953 (1994).

  50. 50.

    Perdew, J. P. Density-functional approximation for the correlation energy of the inhomogeneous electron gas. Phys. Rev. B 33, 8822 (1986).

  51. 51.

    Grimme, S. Semiempirical GGA-type density functional constructed with a long-range dispersion correction. J. Comput. Chem. 27, 1787–1799 (2006).

Download references


The authors thank P. Li from Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing for performing DFT calculations. Y. Zheng from the University of Adelaide and Y.-C. Huang from the National Synchrotron Radiation Research Centre are acknowledged for their valuable discussions. The authors acknowledge use of the JEOL 2010 and JEOL JEM-ARM200F STEM within the University of Wollongong (UoW) Electron Microscopy Centre. This project was financially supported by the Australian Research Council (ARC) through ARC Discovery projects (DP160104340 and DP170100436) and a Rail Manufacturing CRC (RMCRC) project.

Author information

Author notes

  1. These authors contributed equally: Jinqiang Zhang and Yufei Zhao.


  1. Center for Clean Energy Technology, School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

    • Jinqiang Zhang
    • , Yufei Zhao
    • , Xin Guo
    •  & Guoxiu Wang
  2. Department of Chemistry, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China

    • Chen Chen
    •  & Yadong Li
  3. Department of Physics, Tamkang University, Tamsui, Taiwan

    • Chung-Li Dong
  4. Department of Chemistry, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan

    • Ru-Shi Liu
    •  & Chih-Pin Han
  5. A.J. Drexel Nanomaterials Institute and Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA

    • Yury Gogotsi


  1. Search for Jinqiang Zhang in:

  2. Search for Yufei Zhao in:

  3. Search for Xin Guo in:

  4. Search for Chen Chen in:

  5. Search for Chung-Li Dong in:

  6. Search for Ru-Shi Liu in:

  7. Search for Chih-Pin Han in:

  8. Search for Yadong Li in:

  9. Search for Yury Gogotsi in:

  10. Search for Guoxiu Wang in:


G.W., J.Z. and Y.Z. conceived the idea. J.Z. and Y.Z. performed the electrochemical experiments. X.G. synthesized the Mo2TiC2Tx MXene. Y.G. provided the MAX materials for this work. J.Z., Y.Z. and X.G. carried out characterizations. C.-L.D., R.-S.L. and C.-P.H. performed and analysed EXAFS and XANES analysis. J.Z., Y.Z., C.C., Y.L., Y.G. and G.W. proposed the mechanism research and discussions. All authors contributed to writing of the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yadong Li or Yury Gogotsi or Guoxiu Wang.

Supplementary information

  1. Supplementary Information

    Supplementary Figs 1–31, Supplementary Tables 1–4, Supplementary Notes 1–5 and Supplementary References

  2. Supplementary Data 1

    Atomic coordinates of the optimized (3x3) Mo2TiC2O2–PtSA model

  3. Supplementary Data 2

    Atomic coordinates of the optimized (3x3) Mo2TiC2O2 model

  4. Supplementary Data 3

    Atomic coordinates of the optimized (4x4) Mo2TiC2O2–PtSA model

  5. Supplementary Data 4

    Atomic coordinates of the optimized (4x4) Mo2TiC2O2 model

About this article

Publication history