Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

An artificial neural tactile sensing system


Humans detect tactile stimuli through a combination of pressure and vibration signals using different types of cutaneous receptor. The development of artificial tactile perception systems is of interest in the development of robotics and prosthetics, and artificial receptors, nerves and skin have been created. However, constructing systems with human-like capabilities remains challenging. Here, we report an artificial neural tactile skin system that mimics the human tactile recognition process using particle-based polymer composite sensors and a signal-converting system. The sensors respond to pressure and vibration selectively, similarly to slow adaptive and fast adaptive mechanoreceptors in human skin, and can generate sensory neuron-like output signal patterns. We show in an ex vivo test that undistorted transmission of the output signals through an afferent tactile mouse nerve fibre is possible, and in an in vivo test that the signals can stimulate a rat motor nerve to induce the contraction of a hindlimb muscle. We use our tactile sensing system to develop an artificial finger that can learn to classify fine and complex textures by integrating the sensor signals with a deep learning technique. The approach can also be used to predict unknown textures on the basis of the trained model.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Artificial tactile sensory system mimicking a biological system.
Fig. 2: Biomimetic T-skin sensors with particle-based polymer composites.
Fig. 3: Signal-converting system converting sensor signals to sensory neuron-mimicking signals.
Fig. 4: Biological applications of T-skin system.
Fig. 5: Surface texture recognition using T-skin system as active finger skin.

Data availability

The data supporting the findings of this study are provided in the Supplementary Information. Additional relevant data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


  1. 1.

    Hollins, M. & Risner, S. R. Evidence for the duplex theory of tactile texture perception. Percept. Psychophys. 62, 695–705 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Chun, S., Hwang, I., Son, W., Chang, J. H. & Park, W. Recognition, classification, and prediction of the tactile sense. Nanoscale 10, 10545–10553 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Chun, S. et al. Conductive and stretchable adhesive electronics with miniaturized octopus-like suckers against dry/wet skin for biosignal monitoring. Adv. Funct. Mater. 28, 1805224 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Abraira, V. E. & Ginty, D. D. The sensory neurons of touch. Neuron 79, 618–639 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Chortos, A., Liu, J. & Bao, Z. Pursuing prosthetic electronic skin. Nat. Mater. 15, 937–950 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Hou, C., Wang, H., Zhang, Q., Li, Y. & Zhu, M. Highly conductive, flexible, and compressible all-graphene passive electronic skin for sensing human touch. Adv. Mater. 26, 5018–5024 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Gong, S. et al. A wearable and highly sensitive pressure sensor with ultrathin gold nanowires. Nat. Commun. 5, 3132 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Mannsfeld, S. C. B. et al. Highly sensitive flexible pressure sensors with microstructured rubber dielectric layers. Nat. Mater. 9, 859–864 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Pan, L. et al. An ultra-sensitive resistive pressure sensor based on hollow-sphere microstructure induced elasticity in conducting polymer film. Nat. Commun. 5, 3002 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Someya, T. et al. Conformable, flexible, large-area networks of pressure and thermal sensors with organic transistor active matrixes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 12321–12325 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Wang, C. et al. User-interactive electronic skin for instantaneous pressure visualization. Nat. Mater. 12, 899–904 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Sekitani, T. et al. Organic nonvolatile memory transistors for flexible sensor arrays. Science 326, 1516–1519 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Lee, S. et al. A transparent bending-insensitive pressure sensor. Nat. Nanotechnol. 11, 472–478 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Park, J., Kim, M., Lee, Y., Lee, H. S. & Ko, H. Fingertip skin-inspired microstructured ferroelectric skins discriminate static/dynamic pressure and temperature stimuli. Sci. Adv. 1, e1500661 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Chen, X., Xu, S., Yao, N. & Shi, Y. 1.6 V nanogenerator for mechanical energy harvesting using PZT nanofibers. Nano Lett. 10, 2133–2137 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Chen, J. et al. Harmonic-resonator-based triboelectric nanogenerator as a sustainable power source and a self-powered active vibration sensor. Adv. Mater. 25, 6094–6099 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Lee, W. W. et al. A neuro-inspired artificial peripheral nervous system for scalable electronic skins. Sci. Robot. 4, eaax2198 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Schwartz, G. et al. Flexible polymer transistors with high pressure sensitivity for application in electronic skin and health monitoring. Nat. Commun. 4, 1859 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Chun, K. Y., Son, Y. J., Jeon, E. S. & Lee, S. A self-powered sensor mimicking slow- and fast-adapting cutaneous mechanoreceptors. Adv. Mater. 30, 1706299 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Jin, M. L. et al. An ultrasensitive, visco-poroelastic artificial mechanotransducer skin inspired by Piezo2 protein in mammalian Merkel cells. Adv. Mater. 29, 1605973 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Kim, S. Y. et al. Highly sensitive and multimodal all-carbon skin sensors capable of simultaneously detecting tactile and biological stimuli. Adv. Mater. 27, 4178–4185 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Drotlef, D. M., Amjadi, M., Yunusa, M. & Sitti, M. Bioinspired composite microfibers for skin adhesion and signal amplification of wearable sensors. Adv. Mater. 29, 1701353 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Gerratt, A. P., Michaud, H. O. & Lacour, S. P. Elastomeric electronic skin for prosthetic tactile sensation. Adv. Funct. Mater. 25, 2287–2295 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Nunez, C. G., Navaraj, W. T., Polat, E. O. & Dahiya, R. Energy-autonomous, flexible, and transparent tactile skin. Adv. Funct. Mater. 27, 1606287 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Ha, M., Park, J., Lee, Y. & Ko, H. Triboelectric generators and sensors for self-powered wearable electronics. ACS Nano 9, 3421–3427 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Liao, Z. et al. A tactile sensor translating texture and sliding motion information into electrical pulses. Nanoscale 7, 10801–10806 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Chun, S., Kim, Y., Oh, H. S., Bae, G. & Park, W. A highly sensitive pressure sensor using a double-layered graphene structure for tactile sensing. Nanoscale 7, 11652–11659 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Tee, B. C. K. et al. A skin-inspired organic digital mechanoreceptor. Science 350, 313–316 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Kim, Y. et al. A bioinspired flexible organic artificial afferent nerve. Science 360, 998–1003 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Rongala, U. B., Mazzoni, A. & Oddo, C. M. Neuromorphic artificial touch for categorization of naturalistic textures. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst. 28, 819–828 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Wu, Y. et al. A skin-inspired tactile sensor for smart prosthetics. Sci. Robot. 3, eaat0429 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Chun, S. et al. A tactile sensor using a graphene film formed by the reduced graphene oxide flakes and its detection of surface morphology. Carbon 94, 982–987 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Hu, D. et al. Strategies to achieve high performance piezoelectric nanogenerators. Nano Energy 55, 288–304 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Park, J. et al. Giant tunneling piezoresistance of composite elastomers with interlocked microdome arrays for ultrasensitive and multi-modal electronic skin. ACS Nano 8, 4689–4697 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Chun, S. et al. Bioinspired hairy skin electronics for detecting the direction and incident angle of airflow. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11, 13608–13615 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Zhang, G. et al. Novel piezoelectric paper-based flexible nanogenerators composed of BaTiO3 nanoparticles and bacterial cellulose. Adv. Sci. 3, 1500257 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Lee, M. et al. A hybrid piezoelectric structure for wearable nanogenerators. Adv. Mater. 24, 1759–1764 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Chun, S., Hong, A., Choi, Y., Ha, C. & Park, W. A tactile sensor using a conductive graphene–sponge composite. Nanoscale 8, 9185–9192 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Noorsal, E. et al. A neural stimulator frontend with high-voltage compliance and programmable pulse shape for epiretinal implants. IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits 47, 244–256 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Williams, I. & Constandinou, T. G. An energy-efficient, dynamic voltage scaling neural stimulator for a proprioceptive prosthesis. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Circuits Syst. 7, 129–139 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Thurgood, B. K., Warren, D. J., Ledbetter, N. M., Clark, G. A. & Harrison, R. R. A wireless integrated circuit for 100-channel charge-balanced neural stimulation. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Circuits Syst. 3, 405–414 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    National Research Council Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (National Academies Press, 2010).

  43. 43.

    Zimmermann, K. et al. Phenotyping sensory nerve endings in vitro in the mouse. Nat. Protoc. 4, 174–196 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Jang, J. H. et al. Nociceptive sensitization by complement C5a and C3a in mouse. Pain 148, 343–352 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Shimokawa, T., Koyama, S. & Shinomoto, S. A characterization of the time-rescaled gamma process as a model for spike trains. J. Comp. Neurosci. 29, 183–191 (2009).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Song, K. I., Chu, J. U., Park, S. E., Hwang, D. & Youn, I. Ankle-angle estimation from blind source separated afferent activity in the sciatic nerve for closed-loop functional neuromuscular stimulation system. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 64, 834–843 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

Download references


This study was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF grants 2020R1C1C1007589, 2018R1A6A3A01011866 and 2019M3C1B8077201), a Korea Medical Device Development Fund grant funded by the Korean government (Ministry of Science and ICT, Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, Ministry of Health & Welfare, Ministry of Food and Drug Safety) (NTIS no. 9991006805), the National R&D Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT (2021M3H4A1A03048648 and 2021M3F3A2A01037365), the Smart Project Program through the KAIST–Khalifa Joint Research Center (KK-JRC), the KAIST College of Engineering Global Initiative Convergence Research Program and the KAIST Post-AI Research Project. This work was supported by a Korea University Grant.

Author information




S.C. and W.P. conceived this work and developed the design of the human-like neural T-skin system. S.C. and J.-S.K fabricated the T-skin device and analysed its properties. G.L. analysed the distribution and composition of particles. S.C., C.P. and W.P. measured and analysed tactile sensing properties. J.-S.K., Y.Y. and B.-D.C. designed and fabricated a neural stimulator. S.J.J., Y.C. and D.J. conducted ex vivo experiments and databased the SA and FA response patterns. J.K. and S.P.K. made the mathematical function from firing activity of a single-fibre recording. S.P., D.S., K.S.N., K.-I.S., I.Y. and Y.J. conducted the biological experiments for application of the T-skin system. S.C. conducted the deep learning process. All authors analysed the data, and S.C., S.P. and J.-S.K. wrote the paper. All authors reviewed the manuscript and provided feedback.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Sungwoo Chun or Seongjun Park.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Electronics thanks John Ho, Bozhi Tian and Gordon Cheng for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary text, Figs. 1–30 and Table 1.

Reporting Summary

Supplementary Video 1

Demonstration of human-like artificial neural T-skin system, which includes a T-skin device with sensor board, a neural stimulator for converting to neural signals, the stimulation system of mouse skin and normal transmission in neurons.

Supplementary Video 2

In vivo response test for T-skin system. A vibration with a certain frequency (1, 2, 10, 20, 100, 500 Hz) is applied to the sensor and the contraction of the hindlimb muscle of the rat is investigated.

Supplementary Data 1

Zip file including raw data of the experiments in spreadsheet form.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chun, S., Kim, JS., Yoo, Y. et al. An artificial neural tactile sensing system. Nat Electron 4, 429–438 (2021).

Download citation


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing