Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Three-dimensional curvy electronics created using conformal additive stamp printing

Abstract

Electronic devices are typically manufactured in planar layouts, but many emerging applications, from optoelectronics to wearables, require three-dimensional curvy structures. However, the fabrication of such structures has proved challenging due, in particular, to the lack of an effective manufacturing technology. Here, we show that conformal additive stamp (CAS) printing technology can be used to reliably manufacture three-dimensional curvy electronics. CAS printing employs a pneumatically inflated elastomeric balloon as a conformal stamping medium to pick up pre-fabricated electronic devices and print them onto curvy surfaces. To illustrate the capabilities of the approach, we use it to create various devices with curvy shapes: silicon pellets, photodetector arrays, electrically small antennas, hemispherical solar cells and smart contact lenses. We also show that CAS printing can be used to print onto arbitrary three-dimensional surfaces.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: CAS printing.
Fig. 2: Devices on a hemispherical shell by CAS printing.
Fig. 3: Hemispherical solar cell.
Fig. 4: Multiple functional smart contact lens electronics.
Fig. 5: CAS printing onto various 3D curvilinear substrates.

Data availability

The data that support the plots within this paper and other findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. 1.

    Dinyari, R., Rim, S.-B., Huang, K., Catrysse, P. B. & Peumans, P. Curving monolithic silicon for nonplanar focal plane array applications. Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 091114 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Hung, P. J., Jeong, K., Liu, G. L. & Lee, L. P. Microfabricated suspensions for electrical connections on the tunable elastomer membrane. Appl. Phys. Lett. 85, 6051–6053 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Song, Y. M. et al. Digital cameras with designs inspired by the arthropod eye. Nature 497, 95–99 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Jeong, K.-H., Kim, J. & Lee, L. P. Biologically inspired artificial compound eyes. Science 312, 557–561 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Kim, J. et al. Wearable smart sensor systems integrated on soft contact lenses for wireless ocular diagnostics. Nat. Commun. 8, 14997 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Farandos, N. M., Yetisen, A. K., Monteiro, M. J., Lowe, C. R. & Yun, S. H. Contact lens sensors in ocular diagnostics. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 4, 792–810 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Vásquez Quintero, A., Verplancke, R., De Smet, H. & Vanfleteren, J. Stretchable electronic platform for soft and smart contact lens applications. Adv. Mater. Technol. 2, 1700073 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Adams, J. J. et al. Conformal printing of electrically small antennas on three‐dimensional surfaces. Adv. Mater. 23, 1335–1340 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Kim, O. S. Low-Q electrically small spherical magnetic dipole antennas. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 58, 2210–2217 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Abadia, J., Merli, F., Zurcher, J.-F., Mosig, J. R. & Skrivervik, A. K. 3D-spiral small antenna design and realization for biomedical telemetry in the MICS band. Radioengineering 18, 359–367 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Boncheva, M. et al. Magnetic self-assembly of three-dimensional surfaces from planar sheets. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 3924–3929 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Guo, X. et al. Two-and three-dimensional folding of thin film single-crystalline silicon for photovoltaic power applications. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 20149–20154 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Xu, W. et al. Ultrathin thermoresponsive self-folding 3D graphene. Sci. Adv. 3, e1701084 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Liu, Y., Shaw, B., Dickey, M. D. & Genzer, J. Sequential self-folding of polymer sheets. Sci. Adv. 3, e1602417 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Mei, J., Lovell, M. R. & Mickle, M. H. Formulation and processing of novel conductive solution inks in continuous inkjet printing of 3-D electric circuits. IEEE Trans. Electron. Packag. Manuf. 28, 265–273 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Seong, B. et al. Metal-mesh based transparent electrode on a 3-D curved surface by electrohydrodynamic jet printing. J. Micromech. Microeng. 24, 097002 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    An, B. W. et al. Direct printing of reduced graphene oxide on planar or highly curved surfaces with high resolutions using electrohydrodynamics. Small 11, 2263–2268 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Lee, S. et al. Electroless deposition-assisted 3D printing of micro circuitries for structural electronics. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11, 7123–7130 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Tan, H. W., An, J., Chua, C. K. & Tran, T. Metallic nanoparticle inks for 3D printing of electronics. Adv. Electron. Mater. 5, 1800831 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Mohammed, M. G. & Kramer, R. All‐printed flexible and stretchable electronics. Adv. Mater. 29, 1604965 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Kwon, J. et al. Three-dimensional monolithic integration in flexible printed organic transistors. Nat. Commun. 10, 54 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Ko, H. C. et al. Curvilinear electronics formed using silicon membrane circuits and elastomeric transfer elements. Small 5, 2703–2709 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Ko, H. C. et al. A hemispherical electronic eye camera based on compressible silicon optoelectronics. Nature 454, 748–753 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Huang, C. C. et al. Large field of view wide spectrum artificial reflecting superposition compound eyes. Small 10, 3050–3057 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Wu, H. et al. Conformal pad-printing electrically conductive composites onto thermoplastic hemispheres: toward sustainable fabrication of 3-cents volumetric electrically small antennas. PLoS ONE 10, e0136939 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Sim, K. et al. High fidelity tape transfer printing based on chemically induced adhesive strength modulation. Sci. Rep. 5, 16133 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Sim, K., Li, Y., Song, J. & Yu, C. Biaxially stretchable ultrathin Si enabled by serpentine structures on prestrained elastomers. Adv. Mater. Technol. 4, 1800489 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Sim, K., Rao, Z., Li, Y., Yang, D. & Yu, C. Curvy surface conformal ultra-thin transfer printed Si optoelectronic penetrating microprobe arrays. npj Flex. Electron. 2, 2 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Gao, Y. et al. Crack-insensitive wearable electronics enabled through high-strength kevlar fabrics. IEEE Trans. Compon. Packag. Manuf. Technol. 5, 1230–1236 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Xu, S. et al. Assembly of micro/nanomaterials into complex, three-dimensional architectures by compressive buckling. Science 347, 154–159 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Wang, X. et al. Freestanding 3D mesostructures, functional devices, and shape-programmable systems based on mechanically induced assembly with shape memory polymers. Adv. Mater. 31, 1805615 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Zhang, Y. et al. A mechanically driven form of kirigami as a route to 3D mesostructures in micro/nanomembranes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 11757–11764 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Humood, M. et al. Fabrication and deformation of 3D multilayered kirigami microstructures. Small 14, 1703852 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Qian, C. et al. High‐performance organic heterojunction phototransistors based on highly ordered copper phthalocyanine/para‐sexiphenyl thin films. Adv. Funct. Mater. 27, 1604933 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Noh, Y.-Y., Kim, D.-Y. & Yase, K. Highly sensitive thin-film organic phototransistors: effect of wavelength of light source on device performance. J. Appl. Phys. 98, 074505 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Adams, J., Slimmer, S. C., Lewis, J. & Bernhard, J. 3D-printed spherical dipole antenna integrated on small RF node. Electron. Lett. 51, 661–662 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Toriz-Garcia, J. et al. Fabrication of a 3D electrically small antenna using holographic photolithography. J. Micromech. Microeng. 23, 055010 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Liu, F. et al. High performance, tunable electrically small antennas through mechanically guided 3D assembly. Small 15, 1804055 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Lamoureux, A., Lee, K., Shlian, M., Forrest, S. R. & Shtein, M. Dynamic kirigami structures for integrated solar tracking. Nat. Commun. 6, 8092 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Maruyama, T. & Minami, H. Light trapping in spherical silicon solar cell module. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 79, 113–124 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Minemoto, T., Murozono, M., Yamaguchi, Y., Takakura, H. & Hamakawa, Y. Design strategy and development of spherical silicon solar cell with semi-concentration reflector system. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 90, 3009–3013 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Meitl, M. A. et al. Transfer printing by kinetic control of adhesion to an elastomeric stamp. Nat. Mater. 5, 33–38 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Markvart, T. & Castaner, L. in Solar Cells: Materials, Manufacture and Operation 2nd edn (eds McEvoy, A. et al.) Ch. IA-1 (Academic Press, 2012).

  44. 44.

    Park, J. et al. Soft, smart contact lenses with integrations of wireless circuits, glucose sensors, and displays. Sci. Adv. 4, eaap9841 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Thomas, N., Lähdesmäki, I. & Parviz, B. A. A contact lens with an integrated lactate sensor. Sens. Actuators B 162, 128–134 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Gugleta, K., Orgül, S. & Flammer, J. Is corneal temperature correlated with blood-flow velocity in the ophthalmic artery? Curr. Eye Res. 19, 496–501 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    House, J. L., Anderson, E. M. & Ward, W. K. Immobilization techniques to avoid enzyme loss from oxidase-based biosensors: a one-year study. J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 1, 18–27 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Marzouk, S. A. et al. Amperometric monitoring of lactate accumulation in rabbit ischemic myocardium. Talanta 44, 1527–1541 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Kausaite-Minkstimiene, A., Mazeiko, V., Ramanaviciene, A. & Ramanavicius, A. Enzymatically synthesized polyaniline layer for extension of linear detection region of amperometric glucose biosensor. Biosens. Bioelectron. 26, 790–797 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Yu, J., Liu, S. & Ju, H. Glucose sensor for flow injection analysis of serum glucose based on immobilization of glucose oxidase in titania sol–gel membrane. Biosens. Bioelectron. 19, 401–409 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Puggioni, G. et al. Low-temperature storage improves the over-time stability of implantable glucose and lactate biosensors. Sensors 19, 422 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Kim, J. et al. Stretchable silicon nanoribbon electronics for skin prosthesis. Nat. Commun. 5, 5747 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Webb, R. C. et al. Ultrathin conformal devices for precise and continuous thermal characterization of human skin. Nat. Mater. 12, 938–944 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Yu, C. et al. Adaptive optoelectronic camouflage systems with designs inspired by cephalopod skins. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 12998–13003 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

C.Y. thanks the funding support by National Science Foundation (ECCS-1509763 and CMMI-1554499), startup fund and the Bill D. Cook faculty scholarship from the Department of Mechanical Engineering at University of Houston.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

K.S., S.C. and C.Y. conceived and designed the experiment. K.S., S.C., Z.R., J.L., Y.L. and S.J. performed the experiment. Z.L. and J.X. performed numerical analysis. K.S., J.C. and C.Y. analysed experimental data. K.S., Z.L., J.X., F.E. and C.Y. wrote the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cunjiang Yu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Notes 1–4, Table 1 and Figs. 1–44.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sim, K., Chen, S., Li, Z. et al. Three-dimensional curvy electronics created using conformal additive stamp printing. Nat Electron 2, 471–479 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41928-019-0304-4

Download citation

Further reading

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing