A CMOS dynamic random access architecture for radio-frequency readout of quantum devices

Article metrics

Abstract

As quantum processors become more complex, they will require efficient interfaces to deliver signals for control and readout while keeping the number of inputs manageable. Complementary metal–oxide–semiconductor (CMOS) electronics offers established solutions to signal routing and dynamic access, and the use of a CMOS platform for the qubits themselves offers the attractive proposition of integrating classical and quantum devices on-chip. Here, we report a CMOS dynamic random access architecture for readout of multiple quantum devices operating at millikelvin temperatures. Our circuit is divided into cells, each containing a control field-effect transistor and a quantum dot device, formed in the channel of a nanowire transistor. This set-up allows selective readout of the quantum dot and charge storage on the quantum dot gate, similar to one-transistor–one-capacitor (1T-1C) dynamic random access technology. We demonstrate dynamic readout of two cells by interfacing them with a single radio-frequency resonator. Our approach provides a path to reduce the number of input lines per qubit and allow large-scale device arrays to be addressed.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Set-up and individual device characterization.
Fig. 2: Control transistor logic states.
Fig. 3: Charge retention analysis.
Fig. 4: Dynamic readout.
Fig. 5: Integration.

Data availability

The data that support the plots within this paper and other findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. 1.

    Montanaro, A. Quantum algorithms: an overview. npj Quantum Inf. 2, 15023 (2016).

  2. 2.

    Ladd, T. D. et al. Quantum computers. Nature 464, 45–53 (2010).

  3. 3.

    Neill, C. et al. A blueprint for demonstrating quantum supremacy with superconducting qubits. Science 360, 195–199 (2018).

  4. 4.

    van Dijk, J. P. G. et al. The impact of classical control electronics on qubit fidelity. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1803.06176 (2018).

  5. 5.

    Franke, D. P., Clarke, J. S., Vandersypen, L. M. K. & Veldhorst, M. Rent’s rule and extensibility in quantum computing. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1806.02145 (2018).

  6. 6.

    Fowler, A. G., Mariantoni, M., Martinis, J. M. & Cleland, A. N. Surface codes: towards practical large-scale quantum computation. Phys. Rev. A 86, 032324 (2012).

  7. 7.

    Reilly, D. J. Engineering the quantum-classical interface of solid-state qubits. npj Quantum Inf. 1, 15011 (2015).

  8. 8.

    Hornibrook, J. M. et al. Cryogenic control architecture for large-scale quantum computing. Phys. Rev. Appl. 3, 024010 (2015).

  9. 9.

    Homulle, H. et al. A reconfigurable cryogenic platform for the classical control of quantum processors. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 88, 045103 (2017).

  10. 10.

    Veldhorst, M. et al. An addressable quantum dot qubit with fault-tolerant control-fidelity. Nat. Nanotechnol. 9, 981–985 (2014).

  11. 11.

    Muhonen, J. T. et al. Storing quantum information for 30 seconds in a nanoelectronic device. Nat. Nanotechnol. 9, 986–991 (2014).

  12. 12.

    Veldhorst, M. et al. A two qubit logic gate in silicon. Nature 526, 410–414 (2015).

  13. 13.

    Eng, K. et al. Isotopically enhanced triple-quantum-dot qubit. Sci. Adv. 1, e1500214 (2015).

  14. 14.

    Mi, X., Cady, J. V., Zajac, D. M., Deelman, P. W. & Petta, J. R. Strong coupling of a single electron in silicon to a microwave photon. Science 355, 156–158 (2017).

  15. 15.

    Shi, Z. et al. Fast hybrid silicon double-quantum-dot qubit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 140503 (2012).

  16. 16.

    Harvey-Collard, P. et al. Coherent coupling between a quantum dot and a donor in silicon. Nat. Commun. 8, 1029 (2017).

  17. 17.

    Kawakami, E. et al. Electrical control of a long-lived spin qubit in a Si/SiGe quantum dot. Nat. Nanotechnol. 9, 666–670 (2014).

  18. 18.

    Watson, T. F. et al. A programmable two-qubit quantum processor in silicon. Nature 555, 633–637 (2018).

  19. 19.

    Zajac, D. M. et al. Resonantly driven CNOT gate for electron spins. Science 359, 439–442 (2018).

  20. 20.

    Betz, A. C. et al. Dispersively detected Pauli spin-blockade in a silicon nanowire field-effect transistor. Nano Lett. 15, 4622–4627 (2015).

  21. 21.

    West, A. et al. Gate-based single-shot readout of spins in silicon. Nat. Nanotechnol. 14, 437–441 (2019).

  22. 22.

    Pakkiam, P. et al. Single-shot single-gate rf spin readout in silicon. Phys. Rev. X 8, 041032 (2018).

  23. 23.

    Zajac, D. M., Hazard, T. M., Mi, X., Nielsen, E. & Petta, J. R. Scalable gate architecture for a one-dimensional array of semiconductor spin qubits. Phys. Rev. Appl. 6, 054013 (2016).

  24. 24.

    Takeda, K. et al. A fault-tolerant addressable spin qubit in a natural silicon quantum dot. Sci. Adv. 2, e1600694 (2016).

  25. 25.

    Yoneda, J. et al. A quantum-dot spin qubit with coherence limited by charge noise and fidelity higher than 99.9%. Nat. Nanotechnol. 13, 102–106 (2018).

  26. 26.

    Huang, W. et al. Fidelity benchmarks for two-qubit gates in silicon. Nature 569, 532–536 (2019).

  27. 27.

    Maurand, R. et al. A CMOS silicon spin qubit. Nat. Commun. 7, 13575 (2016).

  28. 28.

    Crippa, A. et al. Electrical spin driving by g-matrix modulation in spin–orbit qubits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 137702 (2018).

  29. 29.

    Veldhorst, M., Eenink, H. G. J., Yang, C. H. & Dzurak, A. S. Silicon CMOS architecture for a spin-based quantum computer. Nat. Commun. 8, 1766 (2017).

  30. 30.

    Vandersypen, L. M. K. et al. Interfacing spin qubits in quantum dots and donors—hot, dense and coherent. npj Quantum Inf. 3, 34 (2017).

  31. 31.

    Li, R. et al. A crossbar network for silicon quantum dot qubits. Sci. Adv. 4, eaar3960 (2018).

  32. 32.

    Schaal, S., Barraud, S., Morton, J. J. L. & Gonzalez-Zalba, M. F. Conditional dispersive readout of a CMOS single-electron memory cell. Phys. Rev. Appl. 9, 054016 (2018).

  33. 33.

    Colless, J. I. et al. Dispersive readout of a few-electron double quantum dot with fast RF gate sensors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 046805 (2013).

  34. 34.

    Gonzalez-Zalba, M. F., Barraud, S., Ferguson, A. J. & Betz, A. C. Probing the limits of gate-based charge sensing. Nat. Commun. 6, 6084 (2015).

  35. 35.

    Ahmed, I. et al. Radio-frequency capacitive gate-based sensing. Phys. Rev. Appl. 10, 014018 (2018).

  36. 36.

    Voisin, B. et al. Few-electron edge-state quantum dots in a silicon nanowire field-effect transistor. Nano Lett. 14, 2094–2098 (2014).

  37. 37.

    Mizuta, R., Otxoa, R. M., Betz, A. C. & Gonzalez-Zalba, M. F. Quantum and tunneling capacitance in charge and spin qubits. Phys. Rev. B 95, 045414 (2017).

  38. 38.

    Rossi, A., Zhao, R., Dzurak, A. S. & Gonzalez-Zalba, M. F. Dispersive readout of a silicon quantum dot with an accumulation-mode gate sensor. Appl. Phys. Lett. 110, 212101 (2017).

  39. 39.

    Al-Taie, H. et al. Cryogenic on-chip multiplexer for the study of quantum transport in 256 split-gate devices. Appl. Phys. Lett. 102, 243102 (2013).

  40. 40.

    Puddy, R. K. et al. Multiplexed charge-locking device for large arrays of quantum devices. Appl. Phys. Lett. 107, 143501 (2015).

  41. 41.

    Eichenberger, C. & Guggenbuhl, W. Charge injection of analogue CMOS switches. IEE Proc. G Circ. Devices Syst. 138, 155–159 (1991).

  42. 42.

    Wang, D. T. Modern DRAM Memory Systems: Performance Analysis and a High Performance, Power-Constrained DRAM Scheduling Algorithm. PhD thesis, Univ. Maryland (2005); https://user.eng.umd.edu/~blj/papers/thesis-PhD-wang--DRAM.pdf

  43. 43.

    Esterli, M., Otxoa, R. M. & Gonzalez-Zalba, M. F. Small-signal equivalent circuit for double quantum dots at low-frequencies. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1812.06056 (2018).

  44. 44.

    Maune, B. M. et al. Coherent singlet–triplet oscillations in a silicon-based double quantum dot. Nature 481, 344–347 (2012).

  45. 45.

    Siddiqi, M. Dynamic RAM: Technology Advancements (CRC Press, 2017).

  46. 46.

    Stehlik, J. et al. Fast charge sensing of a cavity-coupled double quantum dot using a Josephson parametric amplifier. Phys. Rev. Appl. 4, 014018 (2015).

  47. 47.

    Zheng, G. et al. Rapid high-fidelity gate-based spin read-out in silicon. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1901.00687 (2019).

  48. 48.

    Srinivasa, V., Xu, H. & Taylor, J. M. Tunable spin–qubit coupling mediated by a multielectron quantum dot. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 226803 (2015).

  49. 49.

    Hornibrook, J. M. et al. Frequency multiplexing for readout of spin qubits. Appl. Phys. Lett. 104, 103108 (2014).

  50. 50.

    Franceschi, S. D. et al. SOI technology for quantum information processing. In Proc. 2016 IEEE Int. Electron Devices Meet. (IEDM) 13.4.1–13.4.4 (IEEE, 2016).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank S. Pauka, S. A. Lyon and M. Schormans for helpful discussions. This research received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement no. 688539 (http://mos-quito.eu) and the Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) through grant agreement no. 318397, as well as from the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) through the Centre for Doctoral Training in Delivering Quantum Technologies (EP/L015242/1) and UNDEDD (EP/K025945/1). M.F.G.Z. and A.R. acknowledge support from the Winton Programme for the Physics of Sustainability and Hughes Hall, University of Cambridge.

Author information

S.S. and M.F.G.-Z. devised the experiment. S.S., A.R. and M.F.G.-Z. performed the experiments. S.B. fabricated the sample. V.N.C.-T. and T.-Y.Y. performed measurements for low-temperature modelling. V.N.C.-T. developed and performed simulations towards integration. S.S. carried out the analysis and prepared the manuscript, with contributions from A.R., J.J.L.M. and M.F.G.-Z.

Correspondence to Simon Schaal or M. Fernando Gonzalez-Zalba.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figs. 1–3, Supplementary Tables 1–2 and Supplementary equations (1)–(6).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schaal, S., Rossi, A., Ciriano-Tejel, V.N. et al. A CMOS dynamic random access architecture for radio-frequency readout of quantum devices. Nat Electron 2, 236–242 (2019) doi:10.1038/s41928-019-0259-5

Download citation

Further reading