Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:

Maintaining the productivity of co-culture systems in the face of environmental change

Abstract

Co-culture systems can address food security issues by sustainably intensifying production of crops and animal protein without requiring additional land area. We show how a graph-theoretic optimization model based on ecological network analysis can determine robust co-culture strategies by controlling the presence of key species. Results of simulations on a hybrid rice and crayfish production system indicate that comparable levels of productivity can be achieved with different ecological network structures.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Optimal rice–crayfish co-culture system.
Fig. 2: Number of species and crayfish productivity of alternative ecosystem structures.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data used in the analysis can be obtained via https://github.com/EcologicalP-Graph/Optimal-rice-crayfish-co-culture-system-/find/main.

Code availability

The software P-graph Studio (v.5.2.2.2) is hosted by the Department of Computer Science and Systems Technology at the University of Pannonia in Hungary21. It is available free of charge for research purposes via www.p-graph.org. The current v.5.2.2.2 runs in Microsoft Windows. The following specifications are required: Microsoft.NET Framework 4.5.1 (x86 and x64) and Windows Installer 4.5. Interested readers can replicate or modify our results using the P-graph Studio model file accessible via https://github.com/EcologicalP-Graph/Optimal-rice-crayfish-co-culture-system-/find/main.

References

  1. Lee, K., Khanal, S. & Bakshi, B. R. Techno-ecologically synergistic food–energy–water systems can meet human and ecosystem needs. Energy Environ. Sci. 14, 3700–3716 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ray, D. K. et al. Climate change has likely already affected global food production. PLoS ONE 14, e0217148 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. IPCC Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability (eds Pörtner, H.-O. et al.) 1–35 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2022).

  4. Godfray, H. C. J. et al. Food security: the challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science 327, 812–818 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bashir, M. A. et al. Co-culture of rice and aquatic animals: an integrated system to achieve production and environmental sustainability. J. Clean. Prod. 249, 119310 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dong, S. et al. Evaluation of the trophic structure and energy flow of a rice–crayfish integrated farming ecosystem based on the Ecopath model. Aquaculture 539, 736626 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Polovina, J. J. Model of a coral reef ecosystem—I. The ECOPATH model and its application to French Frigate Shoals. Coral Reefs 3, 1–11 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Geary, W. L. et al. A guide to ecosystem models and their environmental applications. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 4, 1459–1471 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fath, B. D. et al. Ecological network analysis metrics: the need for an entire ecosystem approach in management and policy. Ocean Coast. Manag. 174, 1–14 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Diffendorfer, J. E., Richards, P. M., Dalrymple, G. H. & DeAngelis, D. L. Applying linear programming to estimate fluxes in ecosystems or food webs: an example from the herpetological assemblage of the freshwater Everglades. Ecol. Model. 144, 99–120 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bolton, S. in Encyclopedia of Ecology 2nd edn, Vol. 4 (ed. Fath, B. D.) 493–497 (Elsevier, 2019).

  12. Galaitsi, S. E., Keisler, J. M., Trump, B. D. & Linkov, I. The need to reconcile concepts that characterize systems facing threats. Risk Anal. 41, 3–15 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lao, A., Cabezas, H., Orosz, A., Friedler, F. & Tan, R. Socio-ecological network structures from process graphs. PLoS ONE 15, e0232384 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Friedler, F., Aviso, K. B., Bertok, B., Foo, D. C. Y. & Tan, R. R. Prospects and challenges for chemical process synthesis with P-graph. Curr. Opin. Chem. Eng. 26, 58–64 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Heymans, J. J. et al. Best practice in Ecopath with Ecosim food-web models for ecosystem-based management. Ecol. Model. 331, 173–184 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hu, L. et al. Can the co-cultivation of rice and fish help sustain rice production? Sci. Rep. 6, 28728 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. He, M., Liu, F. & Wang, F. Resource utilization, competition and cannibalism of the red swamp crayfish Procambarus clarkii in integrated rice-crayfish culture without artificial diets. Aquac. Rep. 20, 100644 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Xu, Q. et al. Conversion from rice–wheat rotation to rice–crayfish coculture increases net ecosystem service values in Hung-tse Lake area, east China. J. Clean. Prod. 319, 128883 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kurth, M. et al. A portfolio decision analysis approach to support energy research and development resource allocation. Energy Policy 105, 128–135 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Friedler, F., Pimentel Lozada, J. & Orosz, Á. P-Graphs for Process Systems Engineering: Mathematical Models and Algorithms (Springer Nature, 2022).

  21. P-Graph (accessed 10 August 2021); www.p-graph.org

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research contributions from H.C. were done under the National Research, Development and Innovation Office (NKFIH), NKFIH Identifier: 135854.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

H. C. and R.R.T. conceived the study. K.B.A. developed the model. A.R.L. created the graphics. All authors analysed the data, wrote the article and did the revisions.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kathleen B. Aviso.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Sustainability thanks Igor Linkov, Shweta Singh and David Styles for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

The Supplementary Information contains complete information on the 60 different ecosystem structures that were studied in this work, including Tables 1–15 and Figs. 1–12.

Reporting Summary

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lao, A.R., Aviso, K.B., Cabezas, H. et al. Maintaining the productivity of co-culture systems in the face of environmental change. Nat Sustain 5, 749–752 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-022-00912-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-022-00912-w

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing