Infrastructure for sustainable development

Abstract

Infrastructure systems form the backbone of every society, providing essential services that include energy, water, waste management, transport and telecommunications. Infrastructure can also create harmful social and environmental impacts, increase vulnerability to natural disasters and leave an unsustainable burden of debt. Investment in infrastructure is at an all-time high globally, thus an ever-increasing number of decisions are being made now that will lock-in patterns of development for future generations. Although for the most part these investments are motivated by the desire to increase economic productivity and employment, we find that infrastructure either directly or indirectly influences the attainment of all of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), including 72% of the targets. We categorize the positive and negative effects of infrastructure and the interdependencies between infrastructure sectors. To ensure that the right infrastructure is built, policymakers need to establish long-term visions for sustainable national infrastructure systems, informed by the SDGs, and develop adaptable plans that can demonstrably deliver their vision.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Current infrastructure stock and forecast future needs to 2040.
Fig. 2: The direct and indirect roles of infrastructure in influencing the targets of the SDGs.
Fig. 3: SDG infrastructure interdependencies.
Fig. 4: Process for infrastructure prioritization to meet the SDGs.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available within the paper and its Supplementary Information.

References

  1. 1.

    Carse, A. in Infrastructures and Social Complexity: A Companion (eds Harvey, P. et al.) (Routledge, 2016).

  2. 2.

    Pederson, P., Dudenhoeffer, D., Hartley, S. & Permann, M. Critical Infrastructure Interdependency Modeling: A Survey of US and International Research (Idaho National Laboratory, 2006).

  3. 3.

    A National Infrastructure for the 21st Century (Council for Science and Technology, 2009).

  4. 4.

    Frischmann, B. M. Infrastructure: The Social Value of Shared Resources (Oxford Univ. Press, 2012).

  5. 5.

    Allen, S. Points and Lines: Diagrams and Projects for the City (Princeton Architectural Press, 1999).

  6. 6.

    Erickson, P., Kartha, S., Lazarus, M. & Tempest, K. Assessing carbon lock-in. Environ. Res. Lett. 10, 084023 (2015).

  7. 7.

    Weinberger, R. & Goetzke, F. Unpacking preference: how previous experience affects auto ownership in the United States. Urban Stud. 47, 2111–2128 (2010).

  8. 8.

    Clark, S. S., Seager, T. P. & Chester, M. V. A capabilities approach to the prioritization of critical infrastructure. Environ. Syst. Decis. 38, 339–352 (2018).

  9. 9.

    Steinbuks, J. & Foster, V. When do firms generate? Evidence on in-house electricity supply in Africa. Energy Econ. 32, 505–514 (2010).

  10. 10.

    Fischer, M. M. Innovation, Networks, and Knowledge Spillovers, Selected Essays (Springer, 2006).

  11. 11.

    Fujita, M., Krugman, P. R. & Venables A. J. The Spatial Economy: Cities, Regions, and International Trade (MIT press, 2001).

  12. 12.

    The Sustainable Infrastructure Imperative: Financing for Better Growth and Development. The 2016 New Climate Economy Report (The Global Commission on the Economy and Climate, 2016).

  13. 13.

    Scholz, M. & Lee, B. H. Constructed wetlands: a review. Int. J. Environ. Stud. 62, 421–447 (2005).

  14. 14.

    van der Kamp, G. & Hayashi, M. The groundwater recharge function of small wetlands in the semi-arid Northern Prairies. Great Plains Res. 8, 39–56 (1998).

  15. 15.

    Dadson, S. J. et al. A restatement of the natural science evidence concerning catchment-based ‘natural’ flood management in the UK. Proc. R. Soc. A 473, 20160706 (2017).

  16. 16.

    Lewis, T. G. Critical Infrastructure Protection in Homeland Security: Defending a Networked Nation (Wiley, 2006).

  17. 17.

    Rinaldi, S. M., Peerenboom, J. P. & Kelly, T. K. Identifying, understanding, and analyzing critical infrastructure interdependencies. IEEE Contr. Syst. Mag. 21, 11–25 (2001).

  18. 18.

    Bollinger, L. & Dijkema, G. Evaluating infrastructure resilience to extreme weather – the case of the Dutch electricity transmission network. Eur. J. Transp. Infrastruct. Res. 16, 214–239 (2016).

  19. 19.

    Global Infrastructure Outlook: 2017 (Global Infrastructure Hub, 2017).

  20. 20.

    Bhattacharya, A. et al. Delivering on Sustainable Infrastructure for Better Development and Better Climate (Brookings Institution, 2016).

  21. 21.

    Ascensão, F. et al. Environmental challenges for the Belt and Road Initiative. Nat. Sustain. 1, 206–209 (2018).

  22. 22.

    Private Participation in Infrastructure (PPI) Annual Report: 2017 (The World Bank, 2017).

  23. 23.

    World Bank Press Release 2015/041/EAP (The World Bank, 2014).

  24. 24.

    Better Infrastructure, Better Economy (European Investment Bank, 2017).

  25. 25.

    African Economic Outlook: 2018 (African Development Bank, 2018).

  26. 26.

    Adam, M. C. & Bevan M. D. Public Investment, Public Finance, and Growth: The Impact of Distortionary Taxation, Recurrent Costs, and Incomplete Appropriability (International Monetary Fund, 2014).

  27. 27.

    Inclusive Green Growth: The Pathway to Sustainable Development (The World Bank, 2012).

  28. 28.

    Connecting People, Creating Wealth: Infrastructure for Economic Development and Poverty Reduction (Department for International Development, 2013).

  29. 29.

    Ruan, Z., Wang, C., Ming Hui, P. & Liu, Z. Integrated travel network model for studying epidemics: interplay between journeys and epidemic. Sci. Rep. 5, 11401 (2015).

  30. 30.

    Pfeiffer, A., Hepburn, C., Vogt-Schilb, A. & Caldecott, B. Committed emissions from existing and planned power plants and asset stranding required to meet the Paris Agreement. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 054019 (2018).

  31. 31.

    Gaynor, C. & Jennings, M. Gender, Poverty and Public Private Partnerships In Infrastructure, (PPPI). Annex on Gender and Infrastructure (The World Bank, 2004).

  32. 32.

    Bajar, S. & Rajeev, M. The impact of infrastructure provisioning on inequality in India: does the level of development matter? J. Comp. Asian Dev. 15, 122–155 (2016).

  33. 33.

    Hall, J. W., Nicholls, R. J., Tran, M. & Hickford, A. J. The Future of National Infrastructure: A System Of Systems Approach (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2016).

  34. 34.

    Fuso Nerini, F. et al. Mapping synergies and trade-offs between energy and the Sustainable Development Goals. Nat. Energy 3, 10–15 (2018).

  35. 35.

    Bhaduri, A. et al. Achieving sustainable development goals from a water perspective. Front. Environ. Sci. 4, 64 (2016).

  36. 36.

    Transport and Sustainable Development Goals Transport and Communications Bulletin for Asia and the Pacific No. 87 (United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific, 2017).

  37. 37.

    Weitz, N., Carlsen, H., Nilsson, M. & Skånberg, K. Towards systemic and contextual priority setting for implementing the 2030 agenda. Sustain. Sci. 13, 531–548 (2018).

  38. 38.

    Straub, S. Infrastructure and Development: A Critical Appraisal of the Macro Level Literature (The World Bank, 2008).

  39. 39.

    Lee, K., Miguel, E. & Wolfram, C. Appliance ownership and aspirations among electric grid and home solar households in rural Kenya. Am. Econ. Rev. 106, 89–94 (2016).

  40. 40.

    Banister, D. & Berechman, Y. Transport investment and the promotion of economic growth. J. Transp. Geogr. 9, 209–218 (2001).

  41. 41.

    Duranton, G. & Venables, A. J. Place-based Policies for Development World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 8410 (The World Bank, 2018).

  42. 42.

    Mathur, V. K. Human capital-based strategy for regional economic development. Econ. Dev. Q. 13, 203–216 (1999).

  43. 43.

    Venables, A. J., Laird, J. & Overman, H. Transport Investment and Economic Performance: Implications for Project Appraisal (Department for Transport, 2014).

  44. 44.

    N ew Urban Agenda A/RES/71/256 (United Nations, 2017).

  45. 45.

    Hall, J. W. et al. Strategic analysis of the future of national infrastructure. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Civ. Eng. 170, 39–47 (2017).

  46. 46.

    Otto, A. et al. A quantified system-of-systems modeling framework for robust national infrastructure planning. IEEE Syst. J. 10, 385–396 (2016).

  47. 47.

    Allenby, B. & Chester, M. V. Reconceptualizing infrastructure in the Anthropocene. Issues Sci. Technol. 34, 3 (2018).

  48. 48.

    Adshead, D. et al. Evidence-based Infrastructure: Curaçao National Infrastructure Systems Modelling to Support Sustainable and Resilient Infrastructure Development (United Nations Office for Project Services, 2018).

  49. 49.

    Chester, M. V. & Allenby, B. Toward adaptive infrastructure: flexibility and agility in a non-stationarity age. Sustain. Resilient Infrastruct. https://doi.org/10.1080/23789689.2017.1416846 (2018).

  50. 50.

    Siew, Y. J. R., Balatbat, M. C. A. & Carmichael, D. G. A review of building/infrastructure sustainability reporting tools (SRTs). Smart Sustain. Built Environ. 2, 106–139 (2013).

  51. 51.

    Final Report: Recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures, 2017).

  52. 52.

    Strategic Infrastructure Planning: International Best Practice (OECD, 2017).

  53. 53.

    How to Design an Infrastructure Strategy for the UK (Institute for Government, 2017).

  54. 54.

    The Global Competitiveness Report 2017–2018 (World Economic Forum, 2017).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We appreciate the contributions of the Infrastructure Transitions Research Consortium, which is funded by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council by grants EP/101344X/1 and EP/N017064/1. S.T. thanks the United Nations Office for Project Services, specifically R. Jones, G. Morgan, S. Crosskey and T. Sway for providing useful suggestions that improved this manuscript.

Author information

S.T. designed the study. D.A., S.T. and J.W.H. performed most of the analyses. J.W.H., S.T. and D.A. wrote most of the manuscript. All authors contributed to the development of the manuscript through methodological advice, analysis, comments and edits to the text and figures.

Correspondence to Scott Thacker.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Table 1 and 2

Supplementary Table 3

Additional data (qualitative)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Further reading