Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Q&A
  • Published:

On the past, present, and future of in vivo science

Lab Animal volume 50, pages 273–276 (2021)Cite this article

Lab Animal asked a group of experts in industry and academia about how the field has changed over their careers and how they think animal research can be improved in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Garner, J. P. et al. Lab. Anim. (NY) 46, 103–113 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Voelkl, B. et al. Nat. Rev. Neurosc. 21, 384–393 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kafkafi, N. et al. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 87, 218–232 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Agassi, J. Francis Bacon, Robert Boyle (eds), Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science 298 (Springer Science + Business Media, Dordrecht, 2013).

  5. Macleod, M. R. et al. PLoS Biol. 13, e1002273 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Nuzzo, R. Nature 506, 150–152 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kilkenny, C. et al. PLoS ONE 4, e7824 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. van der Worp, H. B. et al. PLoS Med. 7, e1000245 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kilkenny, C. et al. PLoS Biol. 8, e1000412 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Percie du Sert, N. et al. PLOS Biol. 18, e3000410 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Percie du Sert, N. et al. PLOS Biol. 18, e3000411 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Karp, N. A. & Fry, D. BMJ Open Sci. 5, e100126 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Smith, A. J. Lab. Anim. Res. 36, 21 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bertelsen, T. & Øvlisen, K. Lab. Anim. https://doi.org/10.1177/00236772211014433 (2021).

  15. Garner, J. P. ILAR J. 55, 438–56 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Genzel, L. et al. Curr. Biol. 30, R1014–R1018 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Eggel, M. & Wurbel, H. Lab. Anim. 55, 233–24 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Voelkl, B. et al. PLoS Biol. 16, e2003693 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Karp, N. A. et al. Sci. Rep. 10, 6178 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Lab Animal http://www.nature.com/laban/

    Ellen P. Neff

Authors
  1. Ellen P. Neff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ellen P. Neff.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Neff, E.P. On the past, present, and future of in vivo science. Lab Anim 50, 273–276 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41684-021-00848-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41684-021-00848-2

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing