Abstract
The stretching of the lithosphere leading to back-arc basins formation generally develops behind arc-trench systems and is considered the consequence of slab retreat relative to the upper plate. Here, we examine the deformation regime evolution within the overriding plate due to subduction processes, using thermo-mechanical numerical simulations. We explore the north-eastern Eurasia plate boundary and the mechanisms of subducting Pacific plate since 57 Ma. During this time interval, several extensional basins formed along the Eurasia margin, such as the East China Sea, the Japan Sea, and the Kuril basin. Here, we increased the simulation complexity, with the inclusion of (i) the kinematic variability of the Pacific plate over the geological past with respect to a fixed Eurasia, incorporating time-dependent (i.e., temporally evolving) velocities computed from plate motion reconstructions; (ii) a Low-Velocity Zone within the asthenosphere, and (iii) a horizontal eastward mantle flow. Our results show a crucial role of the mantle flow for the development of lithospheric extension and back-arc basin opening, and a main kinematic control of the subduction trench position, which advances and retreats, into distance intervals in the order of \(\sim\) 100 km, and providing stages of compression and extension in a back-arc basin.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
There are several assumptions at the base of back-arc basins formation, which can be the results of different processes, such as mantle motion, or the retreat dynamics, respectively1,2,3,4. However, interactions among a subducting slab, the upper plate, and the mantle govern their occurrence, whether within oceanic or continental plates. This is confirmed by geological and geophysical evidence, such as the timing at which most of the back-arc basins developed and began their closing stage in north-eastern Eurasia5,6,7,8,9,10, which suggests a common trigger, i.e., events related to subduction of oceanic lithosphere4. Nonetheless, the subducting plate velocities play a role both in back-arc basin evolution, and slab morphology and dynamics. Plate kinematic variations are not considered in most of numerical models, which assume constant plate velocities rather than incorporating reconstructed time-dependent velocities, that are indeed expected to impact the slab behavior11,12,13.
Back-arc basins are mostly located throughout the entire western Pacific margin, whereas they are almost absent on its eastern rim5,14. Their opening occurred, and in some cases it still does, mainly along subduction zones that have ’westward’-directed slabs15,16,17, so that a relation between slab dynamics and the divergence of the subduction hinge with respect to the upper plate is suggested14,18. This global geodynamics implies the action of a horizontal ’easterly’-directed mantle flow19,20,21,22. However, compression, associated with large-scale changes in the tectonic regime, may inhibit extension and thus the opening of a back-arc basin23.
The recent subduction history of the Pacific plate under the Eurasia continent begins in the Late Paleocene/Early Eocene, when the subduction of the Izanagi-Pacific spreading ridge occurred. Then, around 57 Ma, a very young Pacific lithosphere started to subduct below the Eurasia continent showing different plate velocities24. Several basins developed during the Cenozoic (Fig. 1), such as the Kuril Basin, the Japan Sea, the East China Sea Shelf, the Yellow Sea, and the Bohai Basin, that were interested by phases of both extension and compression25,26,27,28. For instance, the Japan Sea and the Kuril Basin provide current evolving examples of back-arc basins which opened within a continental plate during the Late Eocene-Miocene. They both should be presently in their closing stage, in Japan after going through a stage of neutral stress regime, whereas in the Kuril area after a stagnation period29,30,31,32,33. Southward, the East China Sea Shelf, the Yellow Sea, and the Bohai Basin went through extension with some phases of compression25,26,27,34.
However, the Pacific plate motion variability (Fig. 2, Tab. S1 Supplementary Information) and its subduction processes beneath Eurasia, gave the main contribution to the geodynamic evolution4,16,33,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44. Thus, in this paper we provide 2D numerical simulations of the interactions between the Pacific and north-eastern Eurasia plates during the last 57 Ma, to investigate the role of variable plate kinematics of a subducting plate on the evolution of a subduction zone and the relative deformation regime along the continental upper plate. Our models include the Pacific plate motion changes45, computed along the profile reported in Figures 1 and 2, a Low-Velocity Zone (LVZ14,18,22,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53), and the mantle flow22. This latter is also based on geochemical evidence in the composition of Cenozoic basalts in the area, revealing an eastward shift of the intraplate and arc volcanism through time during the Eocene-Early Miocene28, so that an eastward mantle flow needs to be addressed as the primary cause of this eastward shift. Furthermore, our approach is similar to the one by22, in which the westward lithospheric drift (or relative eastward mantle wind) is included in the model54,55.
In this paper, we carried out two models to methodologically describe these processes, both using velocity reconstructions of the Pacific plate with respect to fixed Eurasia in the last 57 Ma24: Model 1, without the inclusion of mantle flow, and Model 2, with the use of mantle flow. The 2D profile where the Pacific plate motion history is reconstructed is located at the Pacific-Eurasia plate boundary, in the place where the two plates have been continuously in contact since 57 Ma until today (Figs. 1 and 2).
Results
Model 1 (without mantle flow)
Results of Model 1, without mantle flow (Fig. 3, Fig. S2, and Supplementary Movie SM1 in the Supplementary Information), show no back-arc basin opening throughout the entire subduction evolution, with a slab denoting an almost constant dip. Model 1 also provides an overall small trench retreat and advance, in the range of 100 km (Figs. 3 and 5b, Fig. S2 and Supplementary Movie SM1 in the Supplementary Information). In Model 1, this occurs regardless of the Pacific plate velocity changes through time. At depths (Fig. S2 Supplementary Information), within the wedge in front of the subducting slab, no mantle counterflow is detected, able to induce slab retreat and eventually leading to back-arc basin opening.
Model 2 (with mantle flow)
Results of this numerical simulation (Figs. 4 and 5c, Fig. S3 and Supplementary Movie SM2 in the Supplementary Information) show that, after a short initial advancing trench location from 57 to 55 Ma, the trench is mostly stable from 55 to \(\sim\) 47 Ma (Fig. 4b, c, and Supplementary Movie SM2). During this time, plate velocities change back and forth from 5 to 7 cm/a (Fig. 4a). After that, at \(\sim\) 47 Ma the slab interacts with mantle flow and the extensional phase in the back-arc basin begins (Fig. 4a), with a developed back-arc already at \(\sim\) 32 Ma (Fig. 4b). This is well shown by the analysis of the trench location (Fig. 5c), where it moves away from the upper plate, going from \(\sim\) 1200 to \(\sim\) 1944 km. At this stage, the resulting thin lithosphere in the back-arc basin (\(\sim\) 10 km) locates at \(\sim\) 1750 km (Fig. 4b).
At 32 Ma, a short compressional phase starts, ending at \(\sim\) 28 Ma. At this stage, extension begins again, ending at 25 Ma, whereas compression develops until 23 Ma (Fig. 4c). Velocity slows down during this period from 6 (47 Ma) to 4 cm/a (33 Ma), to increase again until 7 cm/a (25 Ma) and, during this range of time, the trench moves respectively from \(\sim\) 1944 to \(\sim\) 1886 km, then from 1886 to 1913 km, and finally from 1913 to 1874 km, relative to the upper plate (Fig. 4c). At \(\sim\) 23 Ma, a new extensional phase begins, until \(\sim\) 18 Ma. Then a short compressional phase occurs until 16 Ma, and a further very short extensional phase is emplaced until 15 Ma (Fig. 4d). During this time, the trench moved respectively from \(\sim\) 1874 to \(\sim\) 1923 km, then to \(\sim\) 1874 km again, to shift at \(\sim\) 1921 km at the end of the last extensional phase (Figs. 4d and 5c). At this last stage, a short new inversion of the extensional trend starts, until \(\sim\) 13 Ma, when a new extensional phase emplaces until 10 Ma (trench at \(\sim\) 1925 km). During this time, velocities change from 7 to 8 cm/a.
A compressional phase, which makes the trench jump from \(\sim\) 1925 to \(\sim\) 1850 km, starts from \(\sim\) 10, to \(\sim\) 7 Ma (Fig. 4e), with an extensional impulse occurred between 7 and 6 Ma, with the trench jumping from \(\sim\) 1849 to 1951 km (Fig. 4f). A 1 Ma compression occurs again between 6 and 5 Ma, with the trench going from \(\sim\) 1951 to 1925 km. During this compressional phase, the oceanic lithosphere thickened (\(\sim\) 50–60 km) at the left side of the subduction, in the back-arc basin, and starts to subduct with a slab dipping towards the east, opposite to the primary subduction direction (Fig. 4e). A short extension occurs between 5 and 3 Ma and, during this last extensional event, the trench jumps from \(\sim\) 1925 to \(\sim\) 1956 km. After this, compression emplaces until Present-day (0 Ma), and the trench moves from \(\sim\) 1957 to 1918 km (Fig. 4g).
Eventually, in our model, the final width of the basin appears to be of approximately \(\sim\) 714 km which roughly corresponds to the maximum extension occurred along the north-eastern Eurasia margin (Fig. 1). It is worth noting that from 32 Ma, age at which we observe a minimum lithospheric thickness (\(\sim\) 10 km) and maximum extension within the back-arc basin, the lithosphere starts to thicken again, reaching its maximum of \(\sim\) 50 km (Fig. 4g). Extension in the upper plate lithosphere occurs for about 150 km throughout the entire model evolution. From \(\sim\) 1050 km, where the continental plate boundary is located at the beginning of the model run, to \(\sim\) 1200 km at its end. This is evident in Fig. S3 (Supplementary Information).
These model results at depths (Fig. S3 and Supplementary Movie SM2, Supplementary Information) show that the slab is entirely influenced by the eastward mantle flow in the initial opening phases of the back-arc basin, whereas it is mainly influenced by the mantle flow below 200 km in the subsequent phases. In fact, within the first 200 km depth of the numerical domain, where the LVZ decollement level is located, the velocity field has no unique direction and shows, in the subduction wedge, several phases of alternating westward and eastward directions. Moreover, a slab stagnation is evident at about the 660 km discontinuity (Fig. S3 and Supplementary Movie SM2, Supplementary Information).
Discussion
In the last 57 Ma, our numerical modelling results highlight different subduction trench displacements during the evolution of the Pacific subduction along the north-eastern side of the Eurasia plate (Fig. 5). In Figure 5, the deformation regimes and trench motions of the two models, carried out within this study, are reported: Model 1 (panel 5b), without mantle flow, and Model 2 (panel 5c), with mantle flow, whereas in panel 5a, changes of Pacific plate velocity with respect to fixed Eurasia are provided. Simulations with variable plate kinematics and without mantle flow show a small (\(\sim\) 33 km) trench retreat, boosted by every plate velocity change (Fig. 5a and b) without back-arc basin opening (supported by Fig. 3, and Fig. S2 and Supplementary Movie S1 in the Supplementary Information). On the contrary, simulations with variable plate kinematics and mantle flow present the opening of a well-developed back-arc basin (Figs. 4 and 5c, Fig. S3 and Supplementary Movie SM2), with seven retreating phases and seven advancing ones. The alternating behavior of the trench (i.e., advancing, retreating but also neutral) is documented by numerical models in literature58,59 and it is mostly related to some spontaneous changes in plate coupling due to mantle melting, which is not included in our computations, or to changes in the age of the oceanic plate and of the constant convergence rate.
In our models, this behavior is strictly related to subducting plate velocity changes through time41. In fact, a general correspondence between the ages at which velocity variations occur (Fig. 5a and Supplementary Tab. S1) and tectonic deformation changes from predominant extension to predominant contraction in the basin (Figs. 4, 5c, and S4 in the Supplementary Information), is here obtained, with trench displacement in the order of \(\sim\) 2 to \(\sim\) 150 km (Fig. 5c).
Model 2 (Figs. 4 and 5c show a first main extensional phase during which almost the entire back-arc basin opening occurred, between 47 and 32 Ma, producing a general trench retreat of \(\sim\) 740 km (Figs. 4 and 5c, Fig. S3 and Supplementary Movie SM2 in the Supplementary Information). In this time span of \(\sim\) 15 Ma the lithosphere within the basin reached the minimum in thickness (\(\sim\) 10 km). This is in accordance with28, that pointed how the eastward motion of the mantle flow in the area resulted in the first eastward shift of the back-arc extensions in north-east Asia between \(\sim\) 52 Ma and \(\sim\) 33 Ma. This main opening phase of the basin coincides with the only episode of lowering of the Pacific plate velocity in our model. This is evident in Figure 5, comparing panel 5a and panel 5c, and from Supplementary Table S1, where velocity changes are described.
Then, from \(\sim\) 32 Ma, the pure extension within the basin ceased, and extension and compression became competing processes, with increasingly predominance of compression towards the present (Figs. 4, 5a,c, and S4 and Supplementary Movie SM2 in the Supplementary Information). This phase occurs together with a continuous increase in the Pacific plate velocity in time (comparison between Fig. 5a and c, Supplementary Table S1 in the Supplementary Information). This behavior was denoted also by60, although61 recently described an extension phase going from \(\sim\) 15 to \(\sim\) 13.5 Ma, as also obtained by numerical simulation in this study (Figs. 4c and 5c).
Looking at our Model 2 at depths (Fig. S3, Supplementary Information), within the wedge zone, phases in which the circulation is towards the west can be observed above 200 km, in accordance to what shown in62, where the LVZ lubricates and allows the relative motion between the lithosphere and the asthenospheric mantle. Below 200 km depth the eastward mantle flow predominates. However, the presence of an eastward mantle flow is strictly necessary for the opening of the back-arc basin (Figs. 4 and 5c).
It is important noticing that our resulting slabs below 200 km depth in our models should be all verified using mantle tomography, starting with a robust analysis on the reference model used for its computation and method limitations63. We consider, thus, this further analysis out of the aim of this work, since it focuses mostly on the deformation within the back-arc basin in response to plate kinematics, with evaluation of the trench motion.
Episodic extensional and contractional tectonics in the Eastern side of the Eurasian continent are well documented during the entire Mesozoic and Cenozoic26,64,65,66. Indeed, compressional phases in the Late Eocene, Early Miocene, and Late Miocene are observed, in agreement with phases shown by our model results. At \(\sim\) 3.5 Ma the compressive stress regime prevailed28,30,32,33,67. For instance, as a result of this compression, an incipient subduction is inferred by stress, seismicity, and seismic lines on the western side of Japan, currently involving Eurasia and N-America plates4,5,68. Evidence of a current compression is also revealed by recent seismicity, such as the January 1st 2024 Noto Peninsula earthquake (Mw7.5), with reactivation of normal into reverse faults69,70,71,72,73. In our model, an incipient subduction is also induced on the western side of the wedge, during the last contractional phases (Fig. 4f and g). It occurs because of compressional stresses acting on a preexisting weakened layer (Figs. S3 and S5, and Supplementary Movie SM2, in the Supplementary Information) within the thickened lithosphere (\(\sim\) 30–50 km74), emplaced at the end of the main extensional phase (e.g., Fig. 4b, and 7–6 Ma in the Supplementary Video SM2). According to75 these incipient subductions appear to be often strictly related with changes in regional kinematics, at which, in fact, ridges and former subductions represent the lithospheric weaknesses where subduction initiation is originated. Similar behavior has been observed in76, where, along a spreading center, a new subduction can occur as a consequence of arising compressional regimes.
East China sea
In Eastern China, extension can be most likely related to the subduction of the Pacific plate. In fact, timing of extension and compression within the back-arc basin correlates well with the convergence rate of the subducting plate34,37,77. This kinematic control on back-arc basin formation in East Asia is observed comparing the rate of Pacific-Eurasia convergence with the average strain rate in the Bohai Bay Basin during the Cenozoic34. In this basin, the peak of extensional stress occurred during the Middle-to-Late Eocene, when the Pacific-Eurasia convergence rate was at a minimum (Fig. 6). This relation inversely correlates the stretching within the Bohai Bay Basin to the relative motion rate of the Pacific plate with respect to the Eurasia plate34. The stretching slowed down at about 32–20 Ma, coinciding with the end of the main extensional phase of the back-arc basin in our model, whereas weak compression is inferred at 2–0 Ma34 (Fig. 6). In25 compression events are registered at 40 Ma and between 28–16 Ma, in this same area (Fig. 6).
Moving south-eastward in this area, also the Yellow Sea underwent through phases of pulsation between compression and extension, since its evolution beginning \(\sim\) 250 Ma78. During the Cenozoic this area experimented tectonic inversion from extension to compression during Late Eocene-Oligocene, and Pliocene27,78,79 (Fig. 6).
The East China Sea Shelf Basin formed depocenters which migrated from west to east, due to the subducting Pacific plate velocity reduction, which enhanced trench retreat26. During its evolution history, it has experienced strong tectonic extension and four phases of compressive inversions which occurred in the Late Paleocene, Late Eocene, Early Miocene, and Late Miocene26 (Fig. 6). In the Bohai Bay Basin, a similar evolution occurred25,26 and, in this area compression events seem to be related to changes in the Pacific plate kinematics and to interactions with the Philippine Sea plate, the Ryukyu Arc, and the Luzon Arc80.
Japan basin
In our model, the main opening phase within the basin started at about 47 Ma and ceased at about 32 Ma. This latter is the time at which geological and geophysical evidence set the beginning of the opening phase in the Japan Sea basins, although a slightly early opening is assumed81. In this area, from \(\sim\) 32 to \(\sim\) 23 Ma, the volcanic front drifted towards the east, i.e., the Japan Sea started to open at the back of the Japanese island arc, showing active extension until 14–15 Ma2,4,33,43, times at which a neutral stress regime stage engaged with coexisting weak compressional and extensional stresses33,67 (Fig. 6). During this stage, the volcanic front migrated to the west82. In fact, reconstructions of the paleo-position of the volcanic front2, show short inwards (i.e., \(\sim\) 100 km towards the west) migrations of the front itself. This behavior was interpreted as a progressive changing of the Pacific slab dip angle through time2,4. In the last few Ma (\(< 5\) Ma) the northern Japan area is subject to compressional stresses, as shown by earthquake focal mechanisms and old extensional structure re-activated and inverted2,31,67,69,83. Indeed, from geological and geophysical evidence, we can currently observe that, in northern Japan, the hinge of the subducting slab is moving towards the upper plate, unlike other “westward” dipping subduction zones18.
Kuril basin
The evolution of the Kuril basin nearly followed the Japan Sea one, being in active extension since \(\sim\) 32 Ma until about 15-10 Ma, and seems now to be approaching to closure since Mid-Miocene30,32(Fig. 6).
Our work aim was mainly methodologic and was intended to evaluate the upper plate deformation regime in response to time-dependent convergence velocities and mantle flow. Our model shows that there are main compressional and extensional phases which are, to various degrees, observable howsoever in the basins which opened in north-eastern Eurasia through time (Fig. 6). In Figure 6, the deformation regimes observed from literature, e.g., geological and geophysical data, are shown. Of course, these data should be considered as a general overview, since the complexity of the evolution history of the area brought each region to undergo differential local stress regimes through time. From all collected data, appears evident that pure extension prevailed in the area until approximately 36–32 Ma and then compression started to affect the various regions. This first order behavior is attributed to velocity trend reversal of the subducting plate from lowering to rising. This relation between the deformation within the upper Eurasia plate and the convergence velocity of the Pacific oceanic plate is also found in literature34,37 and our results confirm this first order behavior.
In our models, thus, the timing of the evolution phases of the Kuril and Japan Sea back-arc basins is shifted earlier of about 15 Ma with respect to the observed stages, even though the duration of the main opening phase within the basin is coherent with what is observed and with the general life of a back-arc basin (i.e., \(\sim\) 15 Ma28). On the contrary, it is more coherent with processes occurred in the Bohai Bay Basin, fitting even better the evolution of the East China Sea Shelf Basin. Furthermore, it is of course to mention that our 2D model does not take into account any local spatial variation in the 3rd dimension, e.g., the rotation of the Japan block, the interaction of the Eurasia plate with the North America (Okhotsk), Philippine Sea plates, the Bonin Arc and the India-Eurasia collision, which are extensively discussed in the literature, and seem to significantly affect the opening of both the Japan Sea and the Kuril Basins, but also the evolution of the East China Sea region26,28,61,67,84,85,86. Indeed, slab retreat is well known to be deeply influenced by the lateral changes of boundary conditions (e.g., the Mediterranean case87).
Neglecting the presence of the Philippine Sea adjacent subducting slab in our 2D models leads also to a predominant influence of the horizontal mantle flow on the Pacific slab dynamics. In fact, we can speculate that the Philippine Sea slab-related mantle counterflow could interact with first order mantle flow in the area, weakening its action, and leading to changes in timing with which the back-arc basins open and close in time. We also verified that the average velocity variations of the Pacific plate (\(\sim\) 6.5 cm/a) in the last 57 Ma can be considered of the same order of magnitude of that of the Philippine Sea plate (\(\sim\) 6.5 cm/a)45,57, so that our model could be considered as an average behavior of the entire margin under the tectonic influence of the Pacific subducting plate, at least until > 20 Ma. In fact, the Pacific plate alone subducted below the Eurasia plate until 20-10 Ma, when the Philippine Sea plate concurred to rise the geodynamic complexity of the area88,89. Thus, the influence of the Philippine Sea plate would need to be considered at least for the last \(< 20\) Ma evolution history of the area. However, we remark that limitations related to the numerical models could influence both the timing of the whole subduction process, as well as its dynamics.
Conclusions
Our work focuses on the influence of time-dependent velocity boundary conditions in geodynamic numerical modelling, and the related deformation in the upper plate of a subduction zone, in response to plate motion changes with time. This approach is coherent with evidence provided by plate tectonics: plates do not preserve constant velocity through long-term evolution.
With the inclusion of mantle flow, our numerical Model 2, shows that the position of the trench at subduction zones, is strongly affected by the variable kinematic evolution of the subducting plate. Along the Pacific-Eurasia plate boundary, the back-arc basin evolution experienced several phases of compression and extension, according to the trench movements and to increasing and decreasing of the subducting plate velocities.
This behavior is confirmed by geological and geophysical evidence along the entire north-eastern margin of the Eurasia plate, whose evolution history is strongly related to the Pacific plate subduction. However, being our work mainly methodologic, the phases of extension and compression resulted from our models should be considered as the main, first order, deformation behavior of the north-eastern Eurasia margin, that of course needs to be then integrated by regional tectonics of every basin that formed within the entire margin in the last 57 Ma.
On the contrary, Model 1, without mantle flow, shows no dip angle variation of the slab above 200 km depth and no back-arc basin opening throughout the entire subduction duration, which is inconsistent with the evolution of the entire geodynamic history of the eastern margin of the Eurasia plate.
Our work, thus, draw the attention on the importance of considering the interplay between plate kinematic variations and mantle flow, that primarily govern the geodynamic evolution of the eastern side of the Eurasian plate and, more in general, of subduction zones.
Methods
Following43, we use a numerical setup in which a young Pacific plate (20 Ma) starts to subduct beneath Eurasia at 57 Ma, to bypass the Izanagi-Pacific spreading ridge subduction during the Paleocene. The age of the Pacific lithosphere then rapidly increases to reach 120 Ma at the right domain boundary, consistently with plate reconstruction models24,57,89,90,91. Although several authors examined the eastern margin of the Eurasia plate using numerical modelling tools, plate velocity variability according to plate motion reconstructions remains generally poorly investigated in geodynamic modelling43,92,93,94,95.
In this study, we use the numerical code I2VIS96,97, that was modified, following the approach described in the subsequent section, to include time-dependent velocity of the subducting plate as boundary conditions. It solves continuity, momentum, and energy equations using finite difference methods and combines the use of Lagrangian advecting points with a staggered Eulerian grid. Consequently, all the physical properties distributed on Lagrangian points are advected in agreement with the computed velocity field and then interpolated to the fixed Eulerian grid, i.e., the marker-in-cell technique98. Lithologies deform according to non-Newtonian viscous-plastic rheology. The ductile creep viscosity accounts for both dislocation and diffusion creep, as well as for Peierls creep at depths, and mineralogical phase changes are considered99.
Following22, simulations are performed using a grid resolution of 2111x351 nodes with variable grid spacing, giving a resolution which goes from 10 km at the domain margins to 1 km in the subduction area, in a 7000 km-wide and 1400 km-deep computational domain. The free surface upper boundary is simulated using the ’sticky air’ technique96,100,101.
Our model reproduces the subduction of a 5700 km-long oceanic plate under a 1300 km-long continental plate. Both continental and oceanic plates are composed of upper and lower crust, and lithospheric mantle. Periodic boundary conditions are implemented on the left and right sides of the domain22,102, whereas free-slip conditions are applied at the top and the bottom of the computational domain (Fig. S1, Supplementary Information). Velocity boundary conditions in the models were applied continuously at the oceanic lithospheric plate, within an area that goes from about 3500 to 6910 km along distance, so that only the oceanic plate is affected by them. Further details on the application of velocity boundary conditions are in the Supplementary Information (Tab. S1, Figs. S1, and S2, Supplementary Information).
Kinematic and rheological constraints
In our numerical simulations changes in the Pacific plate motions with respect to a fixed Eurasia (Fig. 2) refer to the updated reconstruction models by24, with the inclusion of corrections to the Pacific rotations prior to 83 Ma45,57. Since the model is 2-dimensional, Pacific plate velocities have been calculated as an average along the profile in Figure 1 and, starting from 57 Ma to the present. They vary into an interval between 4 to 9 cm/a (Figs. 1, 2, 3 and 4, as well as Tab. S1 in the Supplementary Information). Variable slab velocities are imposed to the lithosphere (Supplementary Tab. S1), following results obtained by24. The process for implementing time-dependent velocities within the I2VIS numerical code relies on the application, to the oceanic plate velocity, of coefficients computed through four primary steps: (i) establishing key times for the transition of plate velocities; (ii) determining the time interval for which the plate velocity is constant; (iii) introducing a linear transitional change over a 1 Ma period before each key time, transitioning from the previous to the subsequent velocity change; (iv) keeping the constant plate velocity throughout the time interval specified in step (ii)103,104,105,106,107. Velocity changes are applied with the 1 Ma transition as shown also in Fig. 5a.
A sensitivity analysis on rheology of the models have been carried out (Tab. S3, Fig. S6, Supplementary Movies SM3 and SM4, in the Supplementary Information) to evaluate if plate stiffness and viscosity are affected by rapidly changing velocities. This analysis shows that the procedure with which we apply the velocity boundary conditions in the models does not affect the model rheology, not causing any deformation instability within the lithosphere, neither in the upper or lower subducting plates (Tab. S3, Fig. S6, and Movies SM3 and SM4, in the Supplementary Information), so that transition time of 1 Ma is acceptable.
Following the approach of22, we implemented a horizontal asthenospheric mantle flow, applied from 200 km depth, with a constant velocity of 3 cm/a, which corresponds to half of the average convergence velocity of the Pacific plate and is mainly aligned with predictions of the net rotation of the lithosphere with respect to the mantle54,108,109. Furthermore, a LVZ decoupling layer between a 100 and 200 km depth with a constant viscosity value of \(10^{19}\) Pa s was included22. We used an average value for the thickness of the LVZ52,53, although it could have been slightly deviated from its average by tectonic processes occurred in the area until 57 Ma. Within this layer the presence of a small percentage of partial melt (\(\sim \!1-2\)%) and H\(_2\)O causes a drop in the velocity of seismic waves and a low viscosity of the asthenosphere (\(\sim \!10^{17}-10^{19}\) Pa s46,47,48,49) facilitating the relative motion of the lithosphere and the mantle.
Data availability
Numerical solutions were obtained using the I2VIS numerical code, which is not freely available, but can be provided upon email request sent to T. Gerya. The figures were made with the Generic Mapping Tools v. 6.0110, Python 3.9, and PyGMT56. The model input parameters, the used rheology, and the kinematic constraints, with setup allowing the model reproducibility, are provided in the Supplementary Information (e.g., Tabs. S1 and S2, Fig. S1, and Movies SM1-4), and in98.
References
Taylor, B. & Karner, G. On the evolution of marginal basins. Rev. Geophys. 21, 1727–1741. https://doi.org/10.1029/RG021i008p01727 (1983).
Tatsumi, Y., Otofuji, Y.-I., Matsuda, T. & Nohda, S. Opening of the sea of Japan back-arc basin by asthenospheric injection. Tectonophysics 166, 317–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(89)90283-7 (1989).
Doglioni, C. The global tectonic pattern. J. Geodyn. 12, 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/0264-3707(90)90022-M (1990).
Jolivet, L., Tamaki, K. & Fournier, M. Japan sea, opening history and mechanism: A synthesis. J. Geophys. Res. 99, 22237–22259. https://doi.org/10.1029/93jb03463 (1994).
Tamaki, K. & Honza, E. Incipient subduction and deduction along the eastern margin of the japan sea. Tectonophysics 119, 381–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(85)90047-2 (1985).
Tamaki, K. Age estimation of the japan sea on the basis of stratigraphy, basement depth, and heat flow data. J. Geomagn. Geoelectr. 38, 427–446. https://doi.org/10.5636/jgg.38.427 (1986).
Chamot-Rooke, N., Renard, V. & Le Pichon, X. Magnetic anomalies in the shikoku basin: A new interpretation. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 83, 214–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-821X(87)90067-7 (1987).
Rangin, C., Jolivet, L. & Pubellier, M. A simple model for the tectonic evolution of southeast asia and indonesia region for the past 43 m.y. Bulletin De La Societe Geologique De France 889–905 (1990).
Tamaki, K. Opening Tectonics of the Japan Sea (Springer, Boston, MA, 1995).
Taylor, B. & Hayes, D. Origin and History of the South China Sea Basin (American Geophysical Union (AGU), 1983).
Dai, L. et al. Slab rollback versus delamination: Contrasting fates of flat-slab subduction and implications for south china evolution in the mesozoic. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 125, e2019JB019164. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JB019164 (2020).
Dong, H. et al. Joint geodynamic-geophysical inversion suggests passive subduction and accretion of the ontong java plateau. Geophys. Res. Lett. 49, e2022GL100744. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL100744 (2022).
Wang, L. et al. Subduction initiation at the solomon back-arc basin: Contributions from both island arc rheological strength and oceanic plateau collision. Geophys. Res. Lett. 49, e2021GL093369. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL097666 (2022).
Doglioni, C., Carminati, E., Cuffaro, M. & Scrocca, D. Subduction kinematics and dynamic constraints. Earth Sci. Rev. 83, 125–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2007.04.001 (2007).
Dickinson, W. Plate tectonic evolution of north pacific rim. J. Phys. Earth 26, S1–S19. https://doi.org/10.4294/jpe1952.26.Supplement_S1 (1978).
Uyeda, S. & Kanamori, H. Back-arc opening and the mode of subduction. J. Geophys. Res.: Solid Earth 84, 1049–1061. https://doi.org/10.1029/JB084iB03p01049 (1979).
Malinverno, A. & Ryan, W. Extension in the tyrrhenian sea and shortening in the apennines as result of arc migration driven by sinking of the lithosphere. Tectonics 5, 227–245. https://doi.org/10.1029/TC005i002p00227 (1986).
Ficini, E., Cuffaro, M. & Doglioni, C. Asymmetric dynamics at subduction zones derived from plate kinematic constraints. Gondwana Res. 78, 110–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2019.07.013 (2020).
Doglioni, C. A proposal for the kinematic modelling of w-dipping subductions - possible applications to the tyrrhenian-apennines system. Terra Nova 3, 423–434. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3121.1991.tb00172.x (1991).
Doglioni, C., Gueguen, E., Harabaglia, P. & Mongelli, F. On the origin of west-directed subduction zones and applications to the western mediterranean. Geol. Soc. Spec. Pub. 156, 541–561. https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.1999.156.01.24 (1999).
Doglioni, C. et al. Orogens and slabs vs. their direction of subduction. Earth-Sci. Rev. 45, 167–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-8252(98)00045-2 (1999).
Ficini, E., Dal Zilio, L., Doglioni, C. & Gerya, T. Horizontal mantle flow controls subduction dynamics. Sci. Rep.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-06551-y (2017).
Jolivet, L. & Tamaki, K. Neogene kinematics in the japan sea region and volcanic activity of the northeast Japan arc. Proc., scientific results, ODP, Legs 127/128, Japan Sea 1311–1331, https://doi.org/10.2973/odp.proc.sr.127128-2.239.1992 (1992).
Matthews, K. et al. Global plate boundary evolution and kinematics since the late paleozoic. Global Planet. Change 146, 226–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2016.10.002 (2016).
Su, J. et al. Geometry styles and quantification of inversion structures in the jiyang depression, bohai bay basin, eastern china. Mar. Pet. Geol. 26, 25–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2007.08.003 (2009).
Su, J. et al. Cenozoic inversion of the east china sea shelf basin: Implications for reconstructing cenozoic tectonics of eastern china. Int. Geol. Rev. 56, 1541–1555. https://doi.org/10.1080/00206814.2014.951004 (2014).
Zhang, R., Yang, F., Hu, P., Yang, X. & Peng, Y. Cenozoic tectonic inversion in the northern depression, south yellow sea basin, east asia: Structural styles and driving mechanism. Tectonophysics 798, 228687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2020.228687 (2021).
Dong, Y. et al. Triggering of episodic back-arc extensions in the northeast asian continental margin by deep mantle flow. Geology 51, 193–198. https://doi.org/10.1130/G50724.1 (2023).
Kimura, G. & Tamaki, K. Tectonic Framework of the Kuril Arc Since its Initiation (Terrapub, Tokyo, 1985).
Baranov, B. et al. Evidence for compressionally induced high subsidence rates in the kurile basin (okhotsk sea). Tectonophysics 350, 63–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1951(02)00081-1 (2002).
Sagiya, T. A decade of geonet: 1994–2003 - the continuous gps observation in japan and its impact on earthquake studies -. Earth, Planets Space 56, 29–41. https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03353077 (2004).
TuZino, T. & Murakami, F. Evolution of collision-related basins in the eastern end of the kurile basin, okhotsk sea, northwestern pacific. J. Asian Earth Sci. 33, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2007.09.006 (2008).
Van Horne, A., Sato, H. & Ishiyama, T. Evolution of the sea of japan back-arc and some unsolved issues. Tectonophysics 710–711, 6–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2016.08.020 (2017).
Liu, Q., He, L. & Chen, L. Tectono-thermal modeling of cenozoic multiple rift episodes in the bohai bay basin, eastern china and its geodynamic implications. Int. J. Earth Sci. 107, 53–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00531-017-1550-1 (2018).
Uyeda, S. Facts, ideas and open problems on trench-arc-backarc systems. Dev. Geotecton. 21, 435–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-42688-8.50024-2 (1986).
Maeda, J. Opening of the kuril basin deduced from the magmatic history of central hokkaido, north japan. Tectonophysics 174, 235–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(90)90324-2 (1990).
Northrup, C., Royden, L. & Burchfiel, B. Motion of the pacific plate relative to eurasia and its potential relation to cenozoic extension along the eastern margin of eurasia. Geology 23, 719–722. https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(1995)023<0719:MOTPPR>2.3.CO;2 (1995).
Schellart, W., Jessell, M. & Lister, G. Asymmetric deformation in the backarc region of the kuril arc, northwest pacific: New insights from analogue modeling. Tectonics 22, 2-1–2-17. https://doi.org/10.1029/2002TC001473 (2003).
Schellart, W. & Lister, G. The role of the east asian active margin in widespread extensional and strike-slip deformation in east asia. J. Geol. Soc. 162, 959–972. https://doi.org/10.1144/0016-764904-112 (2005).
Doglioni, C., Carminati, E. & Cuffaro, M. Simple kinematics of subduction zones. Int. Geol. Rev. 48, 479–493. https://doi.org/10.2747/0020-6814.48.6.479 (2006).
Lallemand, S., Heuret, A., Faccenna, C. & Funiciello, F. Subduction dynamics as revealed by trench migration. Tectonicshttps://doi.org/10.1029/2007TC002212 (2008).
Martin, A. Double saloon door tectonics in the japan sea, fossa magna, and the japanese island arc. Tectonophysics 498, 45–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2010.11.016 (2011).
Yang, T., Moresi, L., Zhao, D., Sandiford, D. & Whittaker, J. Cenozoic lithospheric deformation in northeast asia and the rapidly-aging pacific plate. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 492, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2018.03.057 (2018).
Weilin, Z. et al. The formation and evolution of the east china sea shelf basin: A new view. Earth Sci. Rev. 190, 89–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2018.12.009 (2019).
Torsvik, T. et al. Pacific-panthalassic reconstructions: Overview, errata and the way forward. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 20, 3659–3689. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GC008402 (2019).
Stevenson, D. Weakening under stress. Nature 372, 129–130. https://doi.org/10.1038/372129a0 (1994).
Jin, Z.-M., Green, H. & Zhou, Y. Melt topology in partially molten mantle peridotite during ductile deformation. Nature 372, 164–167. https://doi.org/10.1038/372164a0 (1994).
Pollitz, F., Bürgmann, R. & Romanowicz, B. Viscosity of oceanic asthenosphere inferred from remote triggering of earthquakes. Science 280, 1245–1249. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.280.5367.1245 (1998).
Ueda, H., Ohtake, M. & Sato, H. Postseismic crustal deformation following the 1993 hokkaido nanseioki earthquake, northern japan: Evidence for a low-viscosity zone in the uppermost mantle. J. Geophys. Res.: Solid Earth108, ETG 6–1 – 6–12 (2003).
Chertova, M., Spakman, W. & Steinberger, B. Mantle flow influence on subduction evolution. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 489, 258–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2018.02.038 (2018).
Guillaume, B., Funiciello, F. & Faccenna, C. Interplays between mantle flow and slab pull at subduction zones in 3d. J. Geophys. Res.: Solid Earthhttps://doi.org/10.1029/2020JB021574 (2021).
Hua, J., Fischer, K., Becker, T., Gazel, E. & Hirth, G. Asthenospheric low-velocity zone consistent with globally prevalent partial melting. Nat. Geosci. 16, 175–181. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-022-01116-9 (2023).
Thybo, H. The heterogeneous upper mantle low velocity zone. Tectonophysics 416, 53–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2005.11.021 (2006).
Doglioni, C. et al. Tectonically asymmetric earth: From net rotation to polarized westward drift of the lithosphere. Geosci. Front. 6, 401–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2014.02.001 (2015).
Cuffaro, M. & Doglioni, C. On the increasing size of the orogens moving from the alps to the himalayas in the frame of the net rotation of the lithosphere. Gondwana Res. 62, 2–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2017.09.008 (2018).
Tian, D. et al. Pygmt: A python interface for the generic mapping tools. Zenodohttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8303186 (2023).
Müller, R. et al. Gplates: Building a virtual earth through deep time. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 19, 2243–2261. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GC007584 (2018).
Baitsch-Ghirardello, B., Gerya, T. & Burg, J.-P. Geodynamic regimes of intra-oceanic subduction: Implications for arc extension vs. shortening processes. Gondwana Res. 25, 546–560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2012.11.003 (2014).
Dymkova, D., Gerya, T. & Burg, J.-P. 2d thermomechanical modelling of continent-arc-continent collision. Gondwana Res. 32, 138–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2015.02.012 (2016).
Liu, J., Han, J. & Fyfe, W. Cenozoic episodic volcanism and continental rifting in northeast china and possible link to japan sea development as revealed from k-ar geochronology. Tectonophysics 339, 385–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1951(01)00132-9 (2001).
Haji, T. & Yamaji, A. Post-rift stress history of southwest japan inferred from early to middle miocene intrusions and meso-scale faults in the tajima-myokensan area. Island Archttps://doi.org/10.1111/iar.12412 (2021).
Peng, D., Liu, L., Hu, J., Li, S. & Liu, Y. Formation of east asian stagnant slabs due to a pressure-driven cenozoic mantle wind following mesozoic subduction. Geophys. Res. Lett. 48, e2021GL094638. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL094638 (2021).
Foulger, G. R. et al. Caveats on tomographic images. Terra Nova 25, 259–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/ter.12041 (2013).
Suo, Y. et al. Mesozoic-cenozoic basin inversion and geodynamics in east china: A review. Earth-Sci. Rev.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103357 (2020).
Meng, L. & Lin, W. Episodic crustal extension and contraction characterizing the late mesozoic tectonics of east china: Evidence from the jiaodong peninsula, east china. Tectonicshttps://doi.org/10.1029/2020TC006318 (2021).
Liu, J. et al. Early cretaceous tectonics across the north pacific: New insights from multiphase tectonic extension in eastern eurasia. Earth-Sci. Rev.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2021.103552 (2021).
Sato, H. The relationship between late cenozoic tectonic events and stress field and basin development in northeast japan. J. Geophys. Res. 99, 22261–22274. https://doi.org/10.1029/94jb00854 (1994).
Newton, T. & Thomas, A. Stress orientations in the nankai trough constrained using seismic and aseismic slip. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earthhttps://doi.org/10.1029/2020JB019841 (2020).
Okamura, Y., Watanabe, M., Morijiri, R. & Satoh, M. Rifting and basin inversion in the eastern margin of the japan sea. Island Arc 4, 166–181. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1738.1995.tb00141.x (1995).
Okamura, Y., Satake, K., Ikehara, K., Takeuchi, A. & Arai, K. Paleoseismology of deep-sea faults based on marine surveys of northern okushiri ridge in the japan sea. J. Geophys. Res.: Solid Earth 110, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JB003135 (2005).
Choi, H., Hong, T.-K., He, X. & Baag, C.-E. Seismic evidence for reverse activation of a paleo-rifting system in the east sea (sea of japan). Tectonophysics 572–573, 123–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2011.12.023 (2012).
Sato, T., No, T., Kodaira, S., Takahashi, N. & Kaneda, Y. Seismic constraints of the formation process on the back-arc basin in the southeastern japan sea. J. Geophys. Res.: Solid Earth 119, 1563–1579. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JB010643 (2014).
Shinohara, M. et al. Precise aftershock distribution of the 2019 yamagata-oki earthquake using newly developed simple anchored-buoy ocean bottom seismometers and land seismic stations. Earth Planets Spacehttps://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-021-01562-6 (2022).
Akuhara, T. et al. Lithosphere-asthenosphere boundary beneath the sea of japan from transdimensional inversion of s-receiver functions. Earth Planets Spacehttps://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-021-01501-5 (2021).
Lallemand, S. & Arcay, D. Subduction initiation from the earliest stages to self-sustained subduction: Insights from the analysis of 70 cenozoic sites. Earth-Sci. Rev.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2021.103779 (2021).
Liu, M. & Gerya, T. Forced subduction initiation near spreading centers: Effects of brittle-ductile damage. J. Geophys. Res.: Solid Earthhttps://doi.org/10.1029/2022JB024701 (2023).
Otsuki, K. Westward migration of the izu-bonin trench, northward motion of the philippine sea plate, and their relationships to the cenozoic tectonics of japanese island arcs. Tectonophysics 180, 351–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(90)90318-3 (1990).
Hua Lei, B., Xu, M., Wen Chen, J., Liang, J. & Guo Zhang, Y. Structural characteristics and evolution of the south yellow sea basin since indosinian. China Geol. 1, 466–476. https://doi.org/10.31035/cg2018063 (2018).
Shinn, Y. J., Chough, S. & Hwang, I. G. Structural development and tectonic evolution of gunsan basin (cretaceous-tertiary) in the central yellow sea. Mar. Pet. Geol. 27, 500–514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2009.11.001 (2010).
Su, J., Zhu, W., Chen, J., Min, B. & Zheng, B. Wide rift model in bohai bay basin: Insight into the destruction of the north china craton. Int. Geol. Rev. 56, 537–554. https://doi.org/10.1080/00206814.2013.879373 (2014).
Kano, K., Uto, K. & Ohguchi, T. Stratigraphic review of eocene to oligocene successions along the eastern japan sea: Implication for early opening of the japan sea. J. Asian Earth Sci. 30, 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2006.07.003 (2007).
Ohguchi, T., Yoshida, T. & Okami, K. Historical change of the neogene and quaternary volcanic field in the northeast honshu arc, Japan. Memoir Geol. Soc. Jpn. 32, 431–455 (1989).
Itoh, Y. A miocene pull-apart deformation zone at the western margin of the japan sea back-arc basin: Implications for the back-arc opening mode. Tectonophysics 334, 235–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1951(01)00068-3 (2001).
Lallemand, S. & Jolivet, L. Japan sea: A pull-apart basin?. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 76, 375–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-821X(86)90088-9 (1986).
Otofuji, Y., Matsuda, T. & Nohda, S. Opening mode of the japan sea inferred from the palaeomagnetism of the Japan arc. Nature 317, 603–604. https://doi.org/10.1038/317603a0 (1985).
Kimura, G. & Tamaki, K. Collision, rotation, and back-arc spreading in the region of the okhotsk and Japan seas. Tectonics 5, 389–401. https://doi.org/10.1029/TC005i003p00389 (1986).
Jolivet, L. & Faccenna, C. Meditterranean extension and the africa-eurasia collision. Tectonics 19, 1095–1106. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000TC900018 (2000).
Wu, J., Suppe, J., Lu, R. & Kanda, R. Philippine sea and east asian plate tectonics since 52 ma constrained by new subducted slab reconstruction methods. J. Geophys. Res.: Solid Earth 121, 4670–4741. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JB012923 (2016).
Liu, J. et al. Back-arc tectonics and plate reconstruction of the philippine sea-south china sea region since the eocene. Geophys. Res. Lett. 50, e2022GL102154. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL102154 (2023).
Seton, M. et al. Global continental and ocean basin reconstructions since 200ma. Earth Sci. Rev. 113, 212–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2012.03.002 (2012).
Cao, X., Flament, N., Li, S. & Müller, R. D. Spatio-temporal evolution and dynamic origin of jurassic-cretaceous magmatism in the south china block. Earth Sci. Rev. 217, 103605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2021.103605 (2021).
Kameyama, M. & Nishioka, R. Generation of ascending flows in the big mantle wedge (bmw) beneath northeast asia induced by retreat and stagnation of subducted slab. Geophys. Res. Lett.https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL051678 (2012).
Čížková, H., Zahradník, J., Liu, J. & Bina, C. Geodynamic subduction models constrained by deep earthquakes beneath the japan sea and eastern china. Sci. Rep.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-62238-x (2020).
Balázs, A. et al. Oblique subduction and mantle flow control on upper plate deformation: 3d geodynamic modeling. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 569, 117056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2021.117056 (2021).
Wu, Y., Liao, J., Guo, F., Wang, X.-C. & Shen, Y. Styles of trench-parallel mid-ocean ridge subduction affect cenozoic geological evolution in circum-pacific continental margins. Geophys. Res. Lett. 49, e2022GL098428. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL098428 (2022).
Gerya, T. & Yuen, D. Robust characteristics method for modelling multiphase visco-elasto-plastic thermo-mechanical problems. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 163, 83–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2007.04.015 (2007).
Gerya, T. Introduction to Numerical Geodynamic Modelling 2nd edn. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2019).
Gerya, T. & Yuen, D. Characteristics-based marker-in-cell method with conservative finite-differences schemes for modeling geological flows with strongly variable transport properties. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 140, 293–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2003.09.006 (2003).
Faccenda, M. & Dal Zilio, L. The role of solid-solid phase transitions in mantle convection. Lithos 268–271, 198–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2016.11.007 (2017).
Schmeling, H. et al. A benchmark comparison of spontaneous subduction models-towards a free surface. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 171, 198–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2008.06.028 (2008).
Crameri, F. et al. A comparison of numerical surface topography calculations in geodynamic modelling: An evaluation of the sticky air method. Geophys. J. Int. 189, 38–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2012.05388.x (2012).
Dal Zilio, L., Faccenda, M. & Capitanio, F. The role of deep subduction in supercontinent breakup. Tectonophysics 746, 312–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2017.03.006 (2018).
Iaffaldano, G., Bodin, T. & Sambridge, M. Reconstructing plate-motion changes in the presence of finite-rotations noise. Nat. Commun.https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms2051 (2012).
Iaffaldano, G. A geodynamical view on the steadiness of geodetically derived rigid plate motions over geological time. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 15, 238–254. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013GC005088 (2014).
Gaina, C. & Jakob, J. Global eocene tectonic unrest: Possible causes and effects around the north american plate. Tectonophysics 760, 136–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2018.08.010 (2019).
Ulvrova, M., Brune, S. & Williams, S. Breakup without borders: How continents speed up and slow down during rifting. Geophys. Res. Lett. 46, 1338–1347. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL080387 (2019).
Stotz, I., Vilacís, B., Hayek, J., Bunge, H.-P. & Friedrich, A. Yellowstone plume drives neogene north american plate motion change. Geophys. Res.h Lett.https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL095079 (2021).
Gripp, A. & Gordon, R. Young tracks of hotspots and current plate velocities. Geophys. J. Int. 150, 321–361. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-246X.2002.01627.x (2002).
Cuffaro, M. & Doglioni, C. Global kinematics in deep versus shallow hotspot reference frames. Spec. Paper Geol. Soc. Am. 430, 359–374. https://doi.org/10.1130/2007.2430(18) (2007).
Wessel, P. et al. The generic mapping tools version 6. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 20, 5556–5564. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GC008515 (2019).
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank Laurent Jolivet for reading a first version of this manuscript. The Editor Xiaolei Wang and two anonymous reviewers are thanked for their comments which strongly helped to improve the manuscript. This research was supported by Sapienza University (SOGIN 2013, C. Doglioni) and by Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, project number DTA.AD004.347 ’Dinamica della litosfera e deformazione crostale con dati geofisici e geodetici’, M. Cuffaro.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
E.F. developed the idea, designed the experiments, carried out the numerical models, made the results analysis, and provided the first draft of the paper. M.C. developed the idea, contributed to design the experiments, contribute both to the results analysis and to the writing of the paper. C.D. developed the idea and the conceptual model. T.G. improved the numerical code and contributed to the development of the experiments and to the results analysis. All authors contributed to the writing and the review of the paper.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Movie S1.
Supplementary Movie S2.
Supplementary Movie S3.
Supplementary Movie S4.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Ficini, E., Cuffaro, M., Doglioni, C. et al. Variable plate kinematics promotes changes in back-arc deformation regime along the north-eastern Eurasia plate boundary. Sci Rep 14, 7220 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-57890-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-57890-6
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.