Abstract
Target identification is a crucial step in elucidating the mechanisms by which functional food components exert their functions. Here, we identified the G-protein-coupled bile acid receptor 1 (GPBAR1, also known as TGR5) as a target of the triterpenoid mogrol, a class of aglycone mogroside derivative from Siraitia grosvenorii. Mogrol, but not mogrosides, activated cAMP-response element-mediated transcription in a TGR5-dependent manner. Additionally, mogrol selectively activated TGR5 but not the other bile acid-responsive receptors (i.e., farnesoid X receptor, vitamin D receptor, or muscarinic acetylcholine receptor M3). Several amino acids in TGR5 (L71A2.60, W75AECL1, Q77AECL1, R80AECL1, Y89A3.29, F161AECL2, L166A5.39, Y240A6.51, S247A6.58, Y251A6.62, L262A7.35, and L266A7.39) were found to be important for mogrol-induced activation. Mogrol activated insulin secretion under low-glucose conditions in INS-1 pancreatic β-cells, which can be inhibited by a TGR5 inhibitor. Similar effects of mogrol on insulin secretion were observed in the isolated mouse islets. Mogrol administration partially but significantly alleviated hyperglycemia in KKAy diabetic mice by increasing the insulin levels without affecting the β-cell mass or pancreatic insulin content. These results suggest that mogrol stimulates insulin secretion and alleviates hyperglycemia by acting as a TGR5 agonist.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Mogrol is a triterpene derived from Siraitia grosvenorii, used in traditional Chinese medicine. In this Cucurbitaceae plant, mogrol exists primarily in the form of glycosides called mogrosides that have been widely used as a natural sweetener. Mogroside V is a penta-glucose-bound mogroside that is the most potent sweetening agent in this plant. After intake of mogrosides, mogrol is produced by deglycosylation of mogrosides by gastrointestinal enzymes and intestinal microbiota. Mogrol and some mogrosides can be absorbed into the body1,2. Mogrol exerts several biological activities, including ameliorating inflammation in the gut3 and the brain4,5, attenuating osteoclast formation6, and stimulating preadipocyte differentiation7. To date, the effects of mogrol on hyperglycemia and the molecular targets through which mogrol exerts its functions have not been elucidated.
G-protein-coupled bile acid receptor 1 (GPBAR1, also referred to as Takeda G-protein receptor 5 (TGR5)) acts as a bile acid receptor. TGR5 activates Gαs subunits of trimeric G-proteins8, inducing cAMP production and leading to transcription of cAMP-response element (CRE)-regulated genes. Bile acids stimulate gene transcription by activating the nuclear receptor, farnesoid X receptor (FXR)9 in addition to TGR5. Vitamin D receptor (VDR)10 and muscarinic acetylcholine receptor M3 (CHRM3)11 can also be a target of several bile acids12. In addition to synthetic steroidal (e.g., INT-777) and synthetic non-steroidal agonists, recent studies have shown that the terpenoid compounds betulinic acid13,14, oleanolic acid15,16, maslinic acid17, quinovic acid18, and ursolic acid19 can activate TGR5. The limonoids (highly oxygenated terpenoids) nomilin and obacunone, the terpene lactone farnesiferol, and the terpenoid saponin glycyrrhizic acid also act as TGR5 agonists20,21,22,23. However, how terpenoids bind to and activate TGR5 and which physiological functions are involved in this activation remain poorly understood. Targeting GPCRs with functional food factors has recently become topic of interest24,25,26,27,28.
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a major public health concern worldwide. Compared to that in 2021, the prevalence of diabetes is estimated to increase by approximately 1.5-fold, affecting more than 1.3 billion people, by 205029. Excessive sugar intake is associated with T2DM30,31, highlighting the need for sweeteners to curb the sugar intake. In addition, functional ingredients suppressing the blood glucose levels are valuable for the prevention of hyperglycemia. Insufficient insulin release from pancreatic β-cells triggers hyperglycemia. TGR5 is expressed in pancreatic β-cells, and TGR5 activation stimulates insulin secretion16. Compounds that activate β-cell TGR5 are thus expected to suppress elevated blood glucose concentrations. Because mogrol and bile acids display structural similarities, we evaluated whether mogrol can activate TGR5 and found that it does. We subsequently examined whether this activation is associated with physiological functions of mogrol in diabetic animal model.
Results
Mogrol activated TGR5 but did not activate other bile acid receptors
The structures of mogrosides from S. grosvenorii and their aglycone, mogrol, are shown in Fig. 1. TGR5 couples to Gαs8 and its activation is determined by using luciferase reporter assay with CRE32,33. Mogrol dose-dependently induced CRE-mediated transcriptional activity at concentrations over 20 μM in cells overexpressing TGR5 (Fig. 2a, p < 0.01 at 20 μM, p < 0.001 at 50 μM). Mogrol at 10 μM was also significant when compared to control with Student’s t-test (p = 0.003). By contrast, mogrosides IA, IE, IIE, IIIE, IVE, and V did not activate TGR5 at 50 μM (Fig. 2b and c). Unlike deoxycholate (DCA), mogrol did not activate FXR at concentrations up to 100 μM (Fig. 2d). Neither the vitamin D receptor (VDR) nor the muscarinic acetycholine receptor M3 (CHRM3), which have been reported to be targets of bile acids, were activated by mogrol (Fig. 2e and f).
Simulated docking of mogrol to TGR5
To identify TGR5 residues involved in mogrol binding, we computationally docked mogrol with TGR5 from the semisynthetic bile acid INT-777-bound TGR5 structure8 using GNINA. In 20 docking poses, GNINA pose scores ranged from 0.806 to 0.584. Vina scores ranged from − 10.8 to − 8.77 kcal mol−1. The previously reported cryo-EM structure (PDB code: 7CFN) shows that TGR5-bound INT-777 inserts its tetracyclic moiety into the receptor interior8. Based on the structural similarity between mogrol and INT-777, we focused on the 12th docking pose (GNINA pose score: 0.64; Vina score: − 9.52 kcal mol−1) in which the position of the tetracyclic moiety is close to that of INT-777 in the cryo-EM structure (Fig. 3a). In the focused pose, six residues (L742.63, Y893.29, F963.36, F161ECL2, L2627.35, and L2667.39) were involved in van der Waals (vdW) interactions with mogrol, and the side chain of S2707.43 and the main chain of A2506.61 were involved in hydrogen bonds to mogrol (Fig. 3b and c).
We made vectors to express each mutation to Ala of the amino acids in TGR5 predicted to be important for mogrol binding. A luciferase reporter assay showed that L262A7.35 and L266A7.39 mutants were not activated by mogrol, but were activated by DCA, whereas Y89A3.29 and F161AECL2 mutants were not activated by mogrol or DCA (Fig. 4a–h). The loss of activity in L266A is likely to be mogrol selective. Previous studies have revealed that Q77ECL1, R80ECL1, and Y893.29 of TGR5 are binding sites for nomilin and obacunone21 and L712.60, L742.63, W75ECL1, F963.36, S157ECL2, F161ECL2, L1665.39, Y2406.51, S2476.58, and Y2516.62 of TGR5 are important sites for binding to both P395 and INT-7778. L742.63, Y893.29, F963.36, and F161ECL2 are commonly predicted as agonist binding sites in our docking simulation study (Fig. 3a–c) and the previous reports. Ala mutants, W75AECL1, R80AECL1, and S247A6.58 were not activated by mogrol, but were activated by DCA, whereas L71A2.60, Q77AECL1, L166A5.39, Y2406.51, and Y2516.62 were not activated by mogrol or DCA (Figs. 4I–Q). Collectively, these results suggest that mogrol binds into the orthosteric binding pocket of TGR5, and W75ECL1, R80ECL1, S2476.58, L2627.35, and L2667.39 in TGR5 are important for its interaction with mogrol. In addition, L712.60, Q77ECL1, Y893.29, F161ECL2, L1665.39, Y2406.51, and Y2516.62 appear to be crucial for its interaction with mogrol, but we cannot fully rule out the possibility that these mutations disrupt receptor structure. Identified putative binding site of TGR5 for mogrol was shown in Fig. 4r.
Mogrol increased insulin secretion by activating TGR5 in β-cells
Activation of TGR5 promotes insulin secretion by pancreatic β-cells16. We thus examined the effects of mogrol on insulin secretion by INS-1 β-cells. INS-1 cells were stimulated by mogrol for 1 h, and secreted insulin was determined by ELISA. As shown in Fig. 5a, mogrol significantly stimulated insulin secretion under low-glucose, but not high-glucose, conditions. The enhancement was inhibited by the TGR5 inhibitor SBI-115. (Fig. 5b). Cell viability and intracellular insulin content were not affected by the tested concentrations of mogrol (Fig. 5c and d). In addition, the stimulatory effects of mogrol on insulin secretion under low-glucose conditions were observed in the isolated mouse islets (Fig. 5e).
Mogrol increased plasma insulin concentrations and alleviated hyperglycemia in diabetic KKAy mice
Because mogrol stimulates insulin secretion and TGR5 activation has been reported to repress hyperglycemia34, we examined the effects of mogrol on blood glucose levels in the KKAy diabetic mouse model. KKAy diabetic mice were divided into three groups (i.e., a vehicle control, 0.01% mogrol, and 0.05% mogrol) and treated under these conditions for 5 weeks. C57BL/6 J mice were used as a non-diabetic control group. Although the body weight of KKAy mice was higher than that of C57BL/6 J mice, mogrol supplementation exerted no effects on body weight or feeding efficiency among KKAy mice (Fig. 6a and b). Liver and plasma lipid levels in KKAy mice were not significantly affected by mogrol intake (Table 1), but plasma triglyceride levels tended to decrease (p = 0.08 at 0.01% mogrol group). Both intraperitoneal and oral glucose tolerance tests showed that mogrol intake dose-dependently lowered blood glucose concentrations compared with those of KKAy diabetic control mice, whose blood glucose concentrations were elevated compared to C57BL/6 J non-diabetic control mice (Fig. 6c and d). Mogrol intake did not affect insulin sensitivity in KKAy mice (Fig. 6e), but did dose-dependently increase plasma insulin concentrations (Fig. 6f). Pancreatic β-cell mass (Fig. 6g and h) and pancreatic insulin protein levels (Fig. 6i) were not affected by the administration of mogrol.
Discussion
Recent studies have revealed the physiological effects of mogrol, including as anti-inflammatory and anti-osteoporotic activities in mice3,4,5,6, but to date, a molecular target of mogrol has not been elucidated. In this study, we showed that mogrol selectively activates TGR5, while other bile acid receptors, including FXR, VDR, and CHRM3, do not12. Docking simulation analysis and evaluation of activation using TGR5 mutants indicate that mogrol acts as an agonist for TGR5. Furthermore, we have demonstrated that mogrol functions as an insulin secretagogue by activating TGR5 in pancreatic β-cells and alleviates hyperglycemia in mice.
Mogrol, but not mogrosides, activated TGR5. Activation of TGR5 by mogrol but not by DCA was abolished in variants with the alanine scanning mutations W75AECL1, R80AECL1, S247A6.58, L262A7.35, and L266A7.39. In contrast, activation of TGR5 by mogrol and DCA was abolished by the mutations L71A2.60, Q77AECL1, Y89A3.29, F161AECL2, L166A5.39, Y2406.51, and Y251A6.62. Our results indicating that mutations L712.60, Y893.29, F161ECL2, L1665.39, Y2406.51, S2476.58, Y251A6.62, L2627.35, and L2667.39 reduce mogrol potency were similar to results obtained with INT-7778. In addition, our observation that Y89A3.29 in TGR5 reduced sensitivity to a bile acid was consistent with a previous study35, whereas decreased DCA sensitivity was ameliorated with the S270A7.43 mutation relative to the Y89A3.29 mutation. W75ECL1 acts as an active site at lid36, and mutation at this site can selectively increase DCA potency or decrease the potency of mogrol and P3958 but does not affect 23H or litocholic acid36. Sasaki et al.21 have shown that limonoid compounds (the most abundant triterpenoids in citrus fruits) nomilin and obacunone activate TGR5, whereas in the triple mutants Q77RECL1/R80QECL1/Y89H3.29 and Q77AECL1/R80AECL1/Y89A3.29 activation by nomilin and/or obacunone, but not taurolithocholic acid, was abolished21. These results suggest that mutations in Q77ECL1, R80ECL1, and Y893.29 exert a negligible effect on overall structure of TGR5. F96A3.36 compromised the potency of the TGR5 agonist 23H but not that of litocholic acid36. Our result with the F96A mutant was similar to the results with litocholic acid. Overall, these results indicate that mogrol binds directly to and acts as an agonist of TGR5.
TGR5 was not activated by mogrosides, glycosides of mogrol, whereas the glycosides of quinovic acid18 and glycyrrhizic acid (a glycoside of glycyrrhetinic acid)20 can activate this receptor. The hypoglycemic effect of ginsenoside Ro, a glycoside of the TGR5 agonist oleanolic acid, was attenuated in TGR5-deficient mice37, whereas it remains unclear whether ginsenoside Ro is itself without deglycosidation or has a direct effect on β-cells. Mogrol-stimulated insulin secretion was inhibited by the TGR5 inhibitor, suggesting that mogrol stimulates insulin secretion by activating TGR5. Our results support the hypothesis that TGR5 activation stimulates insulin secretion in pancreatic β-cells16. Although CHRM3 is expressed in β-cells and contributes to insulin secretion38, mogrol did not affect CHRM3 activation. To our knowledge, the ability of terpenoids and related compounds to modulate insulin secretion by activating TGR5 has not previously been experimentally demonstrated.
Mogrol increased the insulin secretion under low-glucose conditions in INS-1 cells and isolated mouse islets. Kumar et al.16 showed that TGR5 couples with Gαs, but not Gαq, Gαi, and Gα12/13, in MIN6 β-cells and that the activation of TGR5 by oleanolic acid (10 μM), INT-777, and lithocholic acid enhances insulin secretion both under low- and high-glucose concentrations in MIN6 and human β-cells. In addition, the intracellular calcium levels increased at low-glucose concentrations. Although overdosage of insulin secretagogues should be noted in relation to hypoglycemia, to our knowledge, the occurrence of hypoglycemia by TGR agonists has not been reported. Tauroursodeoxycholic acid and oleanolic acid (1 μM) increases the glucose-stimulated insulin secretion from the mouse or human islets under high-glucose, but not low-glucose, concentrations15,39. These results suggest that different ligands may alter the binding mode of the TGR5 receptor and activate different signals, particularly intracellular calcium signaling. Different concentrations of compound could affect cellular signaling in complex ways. The reduced insulinotropic effect of mogrol under high-glucose concentrations may be due to its AMPK activity-promoting effect3,7,40 as AMPK activation has a negative impact on insulin secretion41, although this remains controversial42.
In contrast to some TGR5 agonists37,43,44, mogrol did not affect the body weight or insulin sensitivity in mice. Muscle-specific TGR5 transgenic mice exhibit increased glucose tolerance and a slight improvement in insulin sensitivity (P = 0.066), without any change in their body weight45. Therefore, the effects of muscle TGR5 activation on insulin sensitivity may be limited. The bioavailability, tissue distribution, and tissue accumulation of compounds may have caused these differences.
Dietary supplementation (0.4%) with crude extract of Siraitia grosvenorii (SG-ex) prevented impaired insulin secretion and glucose intolerance in Goto-Kakizaki rats, presumably due to decreased oxidative stress in the pancreas46. By contrast, a single administration of a mogroside-rich extract of Siraitia grosvenorii (SG-gly) can alleviate a rise in blood glucose concentrations after maltose but not glucose loading in rats47. SG-gly contents in SG-ex are low. Thus, anti-oxidative components other than SG-gly in SG-ex seem to be responsible for the observed anti-hyperglycemic effects. Therefore, compounds from Siraitia grosvenorii have several targets by which they may ameliorate hyperglycemia (i.e., SG-gly, maltase inhibitory activity; SG-ex, anti-oxidative activity in the pancreas; mogrol, insulin secretory activity).
In this study, we have demonstrated that TGR5 is a target of mogrol and have identified several amino acids in TGR5 that are key to mogrol binding. Mogrol activated CRE-mediated transcriptional activation in TGR5-expressing cells. By contrast, in 3T3-L1 preadipocytes, mogrol suppresses CRE-mediated CREB activity7. This inconsistency may be due to the existence of mogrol targets other than TGR5. In the present study, we showed that mogrol activated TGR5 and insulin release from pancreatic β-cells, alleviating hyperglycemia at least partly in diabetic KKAy mice. Further studies to identify other mogrol targets could uncover different mechanisms underlying mogrol mediated physiological effects. A limitation of this study is that the TGR5-mediated function of mogrol lacks in vivo experiment. Further mechanistic studies of mogrol using gene knockout animals are warranted. Mogrosides are natural sweeteners that can be used as sugar alternatives. After ingestion, mogrol is produced by the deglycosylation of mogrosides in the intestinal tract and subsequently absorbed by the body1,2. Therefore, mogroside intake, in addition to direct mogrol supplementation, may contribute to the prevention of T2DM by exerting effects other than the reduction of sugar intake.
Methods
Materials
Mogrol and mogrosides were prepared as described previously7. Their structures are shown in Fig. 1. These compounds were purified to at least 96% via HPLC and dissolved in DMSO.
Plasmid construction
To construct the human FXR expression vector p3xFlag-FXR and the human vitamin D receptor (VDR) expression vector pcDNA3.1-VDR, nested PCR reactions were performed using PrimeSTAR HS DNA polymerase and Gflex DNA polymerase (Takara Bio, Shiga, Japan) using cDNA reverse-transcribed from total RNA of human hepatoma HepG2 cells. Primers used in the 1st and 2nd PCR reactions for FXR cloning were as follows: 1st sense: 5′- TCCTCAAGATGAAACTTCAGACAC-3′; 1st antisense: 5′-ATGCAGGATTCCCTGGAGCCTTT-3′; 2nd sense: 5′-GGCGGCCGCCACCATGGGATCAAAAATGAATCTC-3′; 2nd antisense: 5′-GGGATCCTCACTGCACGTCCCAGATTTC-3′. Primers used in the 1st and 2nd PCR reactions for VDR cloning were as follows: 1st sense: 5′-CAGAAGCCTTTGGGTCTGAAGTGTC-3′; 1st antisense: 5′-CAACATCAGTCAGCAGCCACTTAGG-3′; 2nd sense: 5′-GGCGGCCGCCACCATGGAGGCAATGGCGGCCAGC-3′; 2nd antisense: 5′-GGGATCCTCAGGAGATCTCATTGCCAAAC-3′. After cloning cDNA sequences into the pCR2.1-TOPO-TA vector (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), Not I- and BamH I-digested fragments encoding FXR and VDR were inserted into the corresponding sites in p3xFLAG-CMV (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and pcDNA3.1 (Thermo Fisher Scientific), respectively. To construct luciferase reporter vectors for FXR (p4xFXRE-TATA-Luc2P), VDR (p2xVDRE-TATA-Luc2P), and NFAT (p9xNFAT-RE-TATA-Luc2P), annealed oligonucleotides containing four tandem copies of a consensus FXR-responsive IR1 motif48 (sense: 5′-ATAGCACAAGAGGTCATTGACCTTGTCCACAAGAGGTCATTGACCTTGTCCACAAGAGGTCATTGACCTTGTCCACAAGAGGTCATTGACCTTGTCCA-3′, and antisense: 5′-GATCTGGACAAGGTCAATGACCTCTTGTGGACAAGGTCAATGACCTCTTGTGGACAAGGTCAATGACCTCTTGTGGACAAGGTCAATGACCTCTTGTG-3′), annealed oligonucleotides containing two tandem copies of mouse osteopontin VDR response element49 (sense: 5′-CTAGCACAAGGTTCACGAGGTTCACGTCTACAAGGTTCACGAGGTTCACGTCTA-3′, and antisense: 5′-GATCTAGACGTGAACCTCGTGAACCTTGTAGACGTGAACCTCGTGAACCTTGTG-3′), and annealed oligonucleotides containing nine tandem copies of an IL-8 NFAT response element50 (sense: 5′-CTAGCTTGAGGAATTTCCATTGAGGAATTTCCATTGAGGAATTTCCATTGAGGAATTTCCATTGAGGAATTTCCATTGAGGAATTTCCATTGAGGAATTTCCATTGAGGAATTTCCATTGAGGAATTTCCATTA-3′, and antisense: 5′-GATCTAATGGAAATTCCTCAATGGAAATTCCTCAATGGAAATTCCTCAATGGAAATTCCTCAATGGAAATTCCTCAATGGAAATTCCTCAATGGAAATTCCTCAATGGAAATTCCTCAATGGAAATTCCTCAAG-3′) and adenovirus E1b TATA box sequence (sense: 5′-AGCTTAGGGTATATAATGA-3′ and antisense: 5′-TCATTATATACCCTAAGCT-3′) were sequentially inserted into the vector pGL4.11 (Promega, Madison, WI, USA), respectively. Mutant TGR5 expression vectors were constructed by site-directed mutagenesis using Tks Gflex DNA polymerase (Takara Bio) with specific primers (Table S1) and pcDNA3.2-TGR524 as a template. General residue numbering has been used, with sequential numbers retrievable from the GPCRdb51.
Cell culture
HEK293FT cells (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and HepG2 cells (RIKEN Cell Bank, Tsukuba, Japan) were cultured in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 100 U/ml sodium penicillin G, and 100 μg/ml streptomycin sulfate. INS-1 rat pancreatic β-cells52 were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 10 mM HEPES, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 50 μM 2-mercaptoethanol, 100 U/ml sodium penicillin G, and 100 μg/ml streptomycin sulfate. Cells were maintained at 37 °C in an atmosphere containing 5% CO2 and 95% air.
Luciferase reporter assay
HEK293FT cells were seeded in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum without antibiotics. After overnight culture, cells were transfected with a receptor expression vector (pcDNA3.2-TGR524, p3xFlag-FXR, pcDNA3.2-VDR, and pcDNA3.2-CHRM3), a firefly luciferase reporter vector (p4xCRE-TATA-Luc2P53, p4xFXRE-TATA-Luc2P, p2xVDRE-TATA-Luc2P, and p9xNFAT-RE-TATA-Luc2P), and a Renilla luciferase reporter vector (pGL4.74[hRluc/TK] (Promega)) with Opti-MEM (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and PEI MAX (Polysciences Inc, Warrington, PA, USA) for 24 h. The cells were subsequently incubated in the presence of mogrol for 4 h. Luciferase reporter activity was determined as described previously54. Data are expressed as relative light units.
Cell viability assay
INS-1 cells grown in a 48-well plate were cultured with 50 μM mogrol for 24 h, followed by incubation with 5% alamarBlue (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) for 4 h under light shielding. Fluorescence was measured at excitation and emission wavelengths of 544 and 590 nm, respectively, using Fluoroscan Ascent FL (Labsystems, Helsinki, Finland).
Insulin secretion assay and measurement of insulin levels in INS-1 cells
The amounts of insulin secreted by INS-1 cells were determined as previously described53. Briefly, INS-1 cells seeded in a 48-well plate were incubated with the Krebs–Ringer bicarbonate buffer containing 0.1% bovine serum albumin and glucose (2.8 or 16.7 mM) in the presence or absence of 50 μM mogrol for 1 h. Cells were pretreated with the TGR5 inhibitor, SBI-115, for 40 min, followed by mogrol treatment. INS-1 cells grown in a 48-well plate were cultured with 50 μM mogrol for 24 h. Cell lysates were prepared using a lysis buffer (50 mM Tris–HCl, 150 mM NaCl, 0.5% NP-40, and 2 mM EDTA). The amounts of secreted insulin and intracellular insulin were determined using sandwich ELISA as previously described53. Bovine insulin was used as the standard.
Insulin secretion assay using isolated mouse islets
Pancreatic islets were isolated from 8–9-week-old ICR mice (Kiwa Laboratory Animals, Wakayama, Japan) as reported previously53, with minor modification. Briefly, after collagenase digestion, the pancreas was fractionated via Ficoll-diatrizoate density gradient centrifugation. Mouse islets (3–4 islets/tube) were incubated with the Krebs–Ringer bicarbonate buffer containing 0.1% bovine serum albumin with a basal (2.8 mM) or stimulatory (16.7 mM) level of glucose for 1 h in the presence of mogrol. Secreted and intracellular insulin concentrations were measured using ELISA, as previously described53. Finally, the ratio of secreted to intracellular insulin was calculated.
Structure-based docking simulation
Coordinates from a structure of human TGR5–Gs complex with bound bile acid derivative INT-777, solved by cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) (Protein Data Bank [PDB] code: 7CFN)8 were used for our docking studies examining TGR5–mogrol binding. A three-dimensional structure of mogrol was obtained from PubChem (CID: 14,525,327). Hydrogen atoms and missing heavy atoms were added to the experimental TGR5 structure using Protein Repair and Analysis Server55. In silico docking of the mogrol molecule with the TGR5 structure was performed using GNINA56 version 1.0.2 (derivative of SMINA57 and AutoDock Vina58,59 that supports convolutional neural network scoring). The docking box in the simulation was automatically set up with reference to the INT-777 coordinates in 7CFN. During docking simulations, the rotational bands of the small molecule were explicitly considered to be flexible, and the protein was treated as a rigid body. TGR5–mogrol interactions in the docking results were analyzed and detected using Protein–Ligand Interaction Profiler60,61 version 2.2.2.
Animals
Male 4-week-old C57BL/6 J and KKAy mice were obtained from CLEA Japan (Tokyo, Japan) and individually housed (cage size: 136 × 208 × 115 mm; bedding material: clean chip, CLEA Japan). Additionally, male 8-week-old ICR mice were obtained from Kiwa Laboratory Animals and housed in a group (cage size: 225 × 338 × 140 mm; bedding material: clean chip) under conventional conditions with controlled temperatures (23 ± 3 °C), a 12/12-h light/dark cycle (light period starting at 08:00 AM), and ad libitum access to standard food (CE-2, CLEA Japan) and water. After acclimation for one week, C57BL/6 J mice (the non-diabetic control group, n = 6, 20.4 ± 0.2 g) continued to receive the standard diet for 5 weeks, while KKAy diabetic mice were divided into three groups (n = 8–9, diabetic control group, 28.4 ± 0.2 g; 0.01% mogrol group, 28.7 ± 0.4 g; 0.05% mogrol group, 28.5 ± 0.7 g), with each group having a similar body weight distribution and fed a high-fat diet (HFD)62 for 5 weeks. The KKAy diabetic control group was fed HFD alone, and the other groups were fed HFD containing 0.01 or 0.05% (w/w) mogrol. For the intraperitoneal glucose tolerance test (IPGTT), oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), and insulin tolerance test (ITT), the mice fasted for 6 h (from 09:00 AM), then 2 g/kg glucose or 1 U bovine insulin were intraperitoneally or orally administered. Blood was collected from the tail vein, and glucose levels were measured using a Stat Strip Express Glucose/Ketone meter (Nova Biomedical, Waltham, MA, USA). These tolerance tests were performed in animal care room. After 4 h of fasting (from 09:00 AM), mice were kept unconscious under isoflurane anesthesia (5% for introduction and 2% for maintenance, SN-487, Shinano Seisakusho, Tokyo, Japan) and euthanized by exsanguination from inferior vena cava, and blood and organs were harvested for further analysis. Four groups of mice were treated and dissected alternately. After acclimation for one week, ICR mice (n = 2) were euthanized via cervical dislocation, and the pancreatic islets were isolated. All animal experiments were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of the Osaka Metropolitan University (Nos. 22–17 and 23–132) and were performed in compliance with its guidelines and the ARRIVE guidelines.
Immunohistochemistry and measurement of pancreatic insulin levels
Pancreatic β-cell mass was determined as previously described63. Briefly, formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded pancreatic tissue sections were prepared. The sections were mixed with an anti-insulin antibody (D6C4, Hytest, Turku, Finland), Histofine Simple Stain mouse MAX-PO (Nichirei, Tokyo, Japan), and DAB peroxidase substrate kit (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA), followed by counterstaining with hematoxylin. The tissue sections were observed under a light microscope (BZ-X810, Keyence, Osaka, Japan), and the staining intensity was determined using the Image Pro software (ver. 10, Media Cybernetics, Silver Spring, MD, UDA). β-cell mass was calculated as follows: ratio of β-cell area to total pancreatic area × pancreatic weight/body weight. To determine the pancreatic insulin content, the pancreas were homogenized in acid–ethanol (1.5% HCl in 70% ethanol). After neutralization with 1 M Tris–HCl (pH 7.5), insulin concentrations were determined using ELISA, as previously described53, and normalized to the pancreatic protein content.
Measurement of insulin, triglyceride, cholesterol, and free fatty acid levels
Plasma insulin levels were determined using an Ultra Sensitive Mouse Insulin ELISA Kit (Morinaga Institute of Biological Science Inc., Kanagawa, Japan). Lipids were extracted from the liver by the Folch’s method. Liver and plasma triglyceride, total cholesterol, and free fatty acid (FFA) levels were determined with a triglyceride E-test (Fujifilm Wako, Osaka, Japan), a cholesterol E-test (Fujifilm Wako), and a NEFA C-test (Fujifilm Wako), respectively. Measurements were performed single or duplicate.
Statistical analyses
Data were analyzed by two-tailed Student’s t-test or one-way analysis of variance with Tukey–Kramer’s or Dunnett’s post hoc tests using JMP statistical software version 8.0.1 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). Two-way analysis of variance with Bonferroni’s post hoc test was performed using GraphPad Prism statistical software version 5 (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Data are displayed as means ± SEM, and a p-value < 0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference between groups.
Data availability
The data generated during the current study are available from the corresponding author (N.H.) upon reasonable request.
References
Xu, F. et al. Exploring in vitro, in vivo metabolism of mogroside V and distribution of its metabolites in rats by HPLC-ESI-IT-TOF-MS(n). J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 115, 418–430 (2015).
Murata, Y. et al. Digestion and absorption of Siraitia grosvenori triterpenoids in the rat. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 74, 673–676 (2010).
Liang, H. et al. Mogrol, an aglycone of mogrosides, attenuates ulcerative colitis by promoting AMPK activation. Phytomedicine 81, 153427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phymed.2020.153427 (2021).
Chen, G. et al. Neuroprotective effect of mogrol against Aβ(1–42) -induced memory impairment neuroinflammation and apoptosis in mice. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 71, 869–877 (2019).
Wang, H. et al. Mogrol attenuates lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced memory impairment and neuroinflammatory responses in mice. J. Asian Nat. Prod. Res. 22, 864–878 (2020).
Chen, Y. et al. Mogrol attenuates osteoclast formation and bone resorption by inhibiting the TRAF6/MAPK/NF-κB signaling pathway in vitro and protects against osteoporosis in postmenopausal mice. Front. Pharmacol. 13, 803880. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.803880 (2022).
Harada, N. et al. Mogrol derived from Siraitia grosvenorii mogrosides suppresses 3T3-L1 adipocyte differentiation by reducing cAMP-response element-binding protein phosphorylation and increasing AMP-activated protein kinase phosphorylation. PloS One 11, e0162252. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162252 (2016).
Yang, F. et al. Structural basis of GPBAR activation and bile acid recognition. Nature 587, 499–504 (2020).
Goodwin, B. et al. A regulatory cascade of the nuclear receptors FXR, SHP-1, and LRH-1 represses bile acid biosynthesis. Mol. Cell 6, 517–526 (2000).
Makishima, M. et al. Vitamin D receptor as an intestinal bile acid sensor. Science 296, 1313–1316 (2002).
Cheng, K. & Raufman, J. P. Bile acid-induced proliferation of a human colon cancer cell line is mediated by transactivation of epidermal growth factor receptors. Biochem. Pharmacol. 70, 1035–1047 (2005).
Pols, T. W., Noriega, L. G., Nomura, M., Auwerx, J. & Schoonjans, K. The bile acid membrane receptor TGR5 as an emerging target in metabolism and inflammation. J. Hepatol. 54, 1263–1272 (2011).
Lo, S. H. et al. Development of betulinic acid as an agonist of TGR5 receptor using a new in vitro assay. Drug Design Dev. Ther. 10, 2669–2676 (2016).
Yun, Y. et al. Identification of betulinic acid derivatives as potent TGR5 agonists with antidiabetic effects via humanized TGR5(H88Y) mutant mice. J. Med. Chem. 64, 12181–12199 (2021).
Maczewsky, J. et al. TGR5 Activation promotes stimulus-secretion coupling of pancreatic β-cells via a PKA-dependent pathway. Diabetes 68, 324–336 (2019).
Kumar, D. P. et al. Activation of transmembrane bile acid receptor TGR5 stimulates insulin secretion in pancreatic β cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 427, 600–605 (2012).
Murata, S., Sasaki, T., Yamauchi, Y., Shimizu, M. & Sato, R. Maslinic acid activates mTORC1 and human TGR5 and induces skeletal muscle hypertrophy. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 85, 2311–2321 (2021).
Jafri, L. et al. Naturally-occurring TGR5 agonists modulating glucagon-like peptide-1 biosynthesis and secretion. Peptides 78, 51–58 (2016).
Lo, S. H. et al. Ursolic acid activates the TGR5 receptor to enhance GLP-1 secretion in type 1-like diabetic rats. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg’s Arch. Pharmacol. 390, 1097–1104 (2017).
Wang, L. Y. et al. Glycyrrhizic acid increases glucagon like peptide-1 secretion via TGR5 activation in type 1-like diabetic rats. Biomed. Pharmacother. 95, 599–604 (2017).
Sasaki, T. et al. Identification of key amino acid residues in the hTGR5-nomilin interaction and construction of its binding model. PloS One 12, e0179226. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179226 (2017).
Ono, E., Inoue, J., Hashidume, T., Shimizu, M. & Sato, R. Anti-obesity and anti-hyperglycemic effects of the dietary citrus limonoid nomilin in mice fed a high-fat diet. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 410, 677–681 (2011).
Zhang, L. et al. Effects of farnesiferol B on ischemia-reperfusion-induced renal damage, inflammation, and NF-κB signaling. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20, 6280. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20246280 (2019).
Harada, N. et al. Identification of G-protein coupled receptor 55 (GPR55) as a target of curcumin. npj Sci. Food 6, 4. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41538-021-00119-x (2022).
Harada, N. et al. Curcumin activates G protein-coupled receptor 97 (GPR97) in a manner different from glucocorticoid. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 595, 41–46 (2022).
Luo, J. et al. Phytonutrient genistein is a survival factor for pancreatic beta-cells via GPR30-mediated mechanism. J. Nutr. Biochem. 58, 59–70 (2018).
Sánchez-Melgar, A. et al. The antioxidant resveratrol acts as a non-selective adenosine receptor agonist. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 135, 261–273 (2019).
Pi, M. et al. GPCR6A Is a molecular target for the natural products gallate and EGCG in green tea. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 62, e1700770. https://doi.org/10.1002/mnfr.201700770 (2018).
Ong, K. L. et al. Global, regional, and national burden of diabetes from 1990 to 2021, with projections of prevalence to 2050: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet 402, 203–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(23)01301-6 (2023).
Malik, V. S., Popkin, B. M., Bray, G. A., Després, J. P. & Hu, F. B. Sugar-sweetened beverages, obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and cardiovascular disease risk. Circulation 121, 1356–1364. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.109.876185 (2010).
Malik, V. S. & Hu, F. B. The role of sugar-sweetened beverages in the global epidemics of obesity and chronic diseases. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 18, 205–218. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41574-021-00627-6 (2022).
Li, G., Jiang, Q. & Xu, K. CREB family: A significant role in liver fibrosis. Biochimie 163, 94–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biochi.2019.05.014 (2019).
Unal, H. Luciferase reporter assay for unlocking ligand-mediated signaling of GPCRs. Methods Cell Biol. 149, 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.mcb.2018.08.001 (2019).
Donkers, J. M., Roscam Abbing, R. L. P. & van de Graaf, S. F. J. Developments in bile salt based therapies: A critical overview. Biochem. Pharmacol. 161, 1–13 (2019).
Macchiarulo, A. et al. Probing the binding site of bile acids in TGR5. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 4, 1158–1162 (2013).
Chen, G. et al. Cryo-EM structure of activated bile acids receptor TGR5 in complex with stimulatory G protein. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 5, 142. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-020-00262-z (2020).
Jiang, L. S. et al. Ginsenoside Ro ameliorates high-fat diet-induced obesity and insulin resistance in mice via activation of the G protein-coupled bile acid receptor 5 pathway. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 377, 441–451 (2021).
Gautam, D. et al. A critical role for beta cell M3 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors in regulating insulin release and blood glucose homeostasis in vivo. Cell Metab. 3, 449–461 (2006).
Vettorazzi, J. F. et al. The bile acid TUDCA increases glucose-induced insulin secretion via the cAMP/PKA pathway in pancreatic beta cells. Metabolism 65, 54–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metabol.2015.10.021 (2016).
Chen, X. B. et al. Potential AMPK activators of cucurbitane triterpenoids from Siraitia grosvenorii Swingle. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 19, 5776–5781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmc.2011.08.030 (2011).
Fu, A., Eberhard, C. E. & Screaton, R. A. Role of AMPK in pancreatic beta cell function. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 366, 127–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mce.2012.06.020 (2013).
Nguyen-Tu, M. S. et al. Opposing effects on regulated insulin secretion of acute vs chronic stimulation of AMP-activated protein kinase. Diabetologia 65, 997–1011. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-022-05673-x (2022).
Huang, S. et al. TGR5 agonist ameliorates insulin resistance in the skeletal muscles and improves glucose homeostasis in diabetic mice. Metabolism 99, 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metabol.2019.07.003 (2019).
Vettorazzi, J. F. et al. Bile acid TUDCA improves insulin clearance by increasing the expression of insulin-degrading enzyme in the liver of obese mice. Sci. Rep. 7, 14876. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-13974-0 (2017).
Sasaki, T. et al. Muscle-specific TGR5 overexpression improves glucose clearance in glucose-intolerant mice. J. Biol. Chem. 296, 100131. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.RA120.016203 (2021).
Suzuki, Y. A. et al. Antidiabetic effect of long-term supplementation with Siraitia grosvenori on the spontaneously diabetic Goto-Kakizaki rat. Br. J Nutr. 97, 770–775 (2007).
Suzuki, Y. A., Murata, Y., Inui, H., Sugiura, M. & Nakano, Y. Triterpene glycosides of Siraitia grosvenori inhibit rat intestinal maltase and suppress the rise in blood glucose level after a single oral administration of maltose in rats. J. Agric. Food Chem. 53, 2941–2946 (2005).
Laffitte, B. A. et al. Identification of the DNA binding specificity and potential target genes for the farnesoid X-activated receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 10638–10647 (2000).
Noda, M. et al. Identification of a DNA sequence responsible for binding of the 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 receptor and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 enhancement of mouse secreted phosphoprotein 1 (SPP-1 or osteopontin) gene expression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 87, 9995–9999 (1990).
Zhang, W., Takahara, T., Achiha, T., Shibata, H. & Maki, M. Nanoluciferase reporter gene system directed by tandemly repeated pseudo-palindromic NFAT-response elements facilitates analysis of biological endpoint effects of cellular Ca(2+) mobilization. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 19, 605. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19020605 (2018).
Kooistra, A. J. et al. GPCRdb in 2021: Integrating GPCR sequence, structure and function. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, D335–D343 (2021).
Asfari, M. et al. Establishment of 2-mercaptoethanol-dependent differentiated insulin-secreting cell lines. Endocrinology 130, 167–178 (1992).
Horiuchi, H. et al. S-Equol Activates cAMP signaling at the plasma membrane of INS-1 pancreatic beta-cells and protects against streptozotocin-induced hyperglycemia by increasing beta-cell function in male mice. J. Nutr. 147, 1631–1639 (2017).
Harada, N. et al. Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase enhances transcriptional activity of androgen receptor in prostate cancer cells. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 22651–22661 (2007).
Nnyigide, O. S., Nnyigide, T. O., Lee, S. G. & Hyun, K. Protein repair and analysis server: A web server to repair PDB structures, add missing heavy atoms and hydrogen atoms, and assign secondary structures by amide interactions. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 62, 4232–4246 (2022).
McNutt, A. T. et al. GNINA 1.0: Molecular docking with deep learning. J. Cheminform. 13, 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13321-021-00522-2 (2021).
Koes, D. R., Baumgartner, M. P. & Camacho, C. J. Lessons learned in empirical scoring with smina from the CSAR 2011 benchmarking exercise. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 53, 1893–1904 (2013).
Trott, O. & Olson, A. J. AutoDock vina: Improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading. J. Comput. Chem. 31, 455–461 (2010).
Eberhardt, J., Santos-Martins, D., Tillack, A. F. & Forli, S. AutoDock Vina 1.2.0: New docking methods, expanded force field, and python bindings. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 61, 3891–3898 (2021).
Salentin, S., Schreiber, S., Haupt, V. J., Adasme, M. F. & Schroeder, M. PLIP: Fully automated protein-ligand interaction profiler. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, W443–W447 (2015).
Adasme, M. F. et al. PLIP 2021: Expanding the scope of the protein-ligand interaction profiler to DNA and RNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, W530–W534 (2021).
Harada, N. et al. Castration influences intestinal microflora and induces abdominal obesity in high-fat diet-fed mice. Sci. Rep. 6, 23001. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep23001 (2016).
Harada, N. et al. Androgen signaling expands beta-cell mass in male rats and beta-cell androgen receptor is degraded under high-glucose conditions. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 314, E274–E286. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.00211.2017 (2018).
Acknowledgements
We wish to express our appreciation to Kiyo Takeuchi, Mikako Ishihara, and Mai Okuyama (Osaka Prefecture University) for their technical assistance. This work was supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI Grant Numbers 19H02913 and 21K19093 (to N.H.) and 19K05866 (to H.I.), a research grant from Kansai Urban Banking Corporation (to Y.I.), and METI Monozukuri R&D Support Grant Program for SMEs Grant Number JPJ005698 (202052711072) (to Y.M.). We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.com) for English language editing.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
N.H. conceived this research; C.T., N.H., and H.I. designed the research; C.T., N.H., H.U., Y.S., and T.O. performed experiments; Y.T. and T.I. performed docking simulations; Y.Y., Y.I., and Y.M. provided compounds; C.T., N.H., H.U., Y.T., Y.S., T.O., Y.Y., Y.I., T.K., T.I., Y.M., H.I., and R.Y. analyzed and discussed the data and interpreted experimental results. C.T., N.H., and Y.T. prepared figures; N.H. and Y.T. drafted the manuscript; N.H. edited and revised the manuscript; and all authors approved the final version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The funder (Saraya Co. Ltd.) provided support in the form of salaries for the authors (Y.Y., Y.I., and Y.M.) but played no role in study design, data collection and analysis, the decision to publish, or the preparation of the manuscript. N.H. and H.I. received research funds from Saraya Co. Ltd. The other authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Tanaka, C., Harada, N., Teraoka, Y. et al. Mogrol stimulates G-protein-coupled bile acid receptor 1 (GPBAR1/TGR5) and insulin secretion from pancreatic β-cells and alleviates hyperglycemia in mice. Sci Rep 14, 3244 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-53380-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-53380-x
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.