Abstract
PURPOSE Cathepsin B (Cat B) is a cysteine lysosomal protease that is upregulated in many inflammatory diseases and widely expressed in the brain. Here, we used a Cat B activatable near-infrared (NIR) imaging probe to measure glial activation in vivo in the formalin test, a standard orofacial inflammatory pain model. The probe’s efficacy was quantified with immunohistochemical analysis of the somatosensory cortex. PROCEDURES Three different concentrations of Cat B imaging probe (30, 50, 100 pmol/200 g bodyweight) were injected intracisternally into the foramen magnum of rats under anesthesia. Four hours later formalin (1.5%, 50 μl) was injected into the upper lip and the animal’s behaviors recorded for 45 min. Subsequently, animals were repeatedly scanned using the IVIS Spectrum (8, 10, and 28 h post imaging probe injection) to measure extracellular Cat B activity. Aldehyde fixed brain sections were immunostained with antibodies against microglial marker Iba1 or astrocytic GFAP and detected with fluorescently labeled secondary antibodies to quantify co-localization with the fluorescent probe. RESULTS The Cat B imaging probe only slightly altered the formalin test results. Nocifensive behavior was only reduced in phase 1 in the 100 pmol group. In vivo measured fluorescence efficiency was highest in the 100 pmol group 28 h post imaging probe injection. Post-mortem immunohistochemical analysis of the somatosensory cortex detected the greatest amount of NIR fluorescence localized on microglia and astrocytes in the 100 pmol imaging probe group. Sensory neuron neuropeptide and cell injury marker expression in ipsilateral trigeminal ganglia was not altered by the presence of fluorescent probe. CONCLUSIONS These data demonstrate a concentration- and time-dependent visualization of extracellular Cat B in activated glia in the formalin test using a NIR imaging probe. Intracisternal injections are well suited for extracellular CNS proteinase detection in conditions when the blood–brain barrier is intact.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
In response to peripheral tissue injury and/or inflammation, glial cells are activated in the central nervous system (CNS), brain and spinal cord. Their pro-inflammatory state is central in the development of chronic pain1,2,3,4,5,6,7. The study of pathological pain development has included focus on microglia, innate immune cells in the CNS8,9,10. In the healthy, uninjured state, ramified microglia maintain tissue homeostasis by monitoring the CNS environment, clearing toxic substances and cells by phagocytosis, and facilitating synaptic connectivity11. Upon peripheral inflammation, microglia proliferate, and, along with invading macrophages, adapt an M1 pro-inflammatory state. They display distinct morphological and protein expression changes; many proteins such as microglia/macrophage-specific marker Iba1 significantly increase12,13. Activated microglia release pro-inflammatory mediators, cytokines, cyclic nucleotides, and neurotrophic factors that cause secondary activation of neighboring cells such as astrocytes3,5,14,15. In response, astrocytes alter their protein expression including increases in the expression of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP)1,16. Autocrine effects of cytokine and cyclic nucleotide release on microglia include alteration of the subcellular location of peptidases, such as cathepsin, in support of immune functions17,18. Peptidases, such as cathepsin B (Cat B), have been identified as important participants in microglia/astrocyte mediated inflammatory central sensitization and neurodegeneration7,15,19.
Cat B is one of 11 cysteine lysosomal proteases and under normal conditions is found in endo-/lysosomal organelles. It functions as both an endo- and exopeptidase20. It is primarily involved in protein degradation and maintenance of cellular homeostasis7,18,21,22. Upregulation of Cat B is associated with many inflammatory diseases such as arthritis, pancreatitis, cardiovascular diseases, and cancer23,24. Cat B is expressed by activated microglia with intracellular Cat B participating in the expression and release of pro-inflammatory cytokines and neurotoxin25,26,27. In response to reactive oxygen species Cat B is also secreted and can modulate cell adhesion and receptor molecules as well as the extracellular matrix28. While intracellular molecules are extremely difficult to detect with an injectable probe, extracellular Cat B can be visualized using a compound that consists of a substrate molecule specific for this peptidase conjugated with a near infrared dye which fluoresces only upon cleavage29,30. Each protease-activatable fluorescent imaging compound molecule consists of two NIR dye molecules connected by linkers to either end of the protease-specific peptide chain spacer (exact sequence is proprietary information of PerkinElmer). The fluorescence is quenched due to the close proximity of the dye molecules. Upon cleavage by Cat B, the NIRF dye fluoresces31. A previous study used a protease-activatable near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) imaging agent (“Cat B 680 FAST”) to visualize blood–brain barrier breakdown and CNS immune cell infiltration in a mouse model of multiple sclerosis32. Here we investigated if a similar activatable NIRF compound that fluoresces at even longer wavelengths (“Cat B 750 FAST”) could be used to visualize activated glia in the brain in vivo after inducing the formalin test, a rodent model of persistent inflammatory pain33,34.
Used for over 40 years, the formalin test is a standard inflammatory pain test. It has been extensively used to test analgesic properties of novel compounds and study the function of newly identified proteins in nociception35,36. Subcutaneous injection of a small volume of a 1–5% formalin solution produces a biphasic nocifensive response in rodents. Acute phase 1 behavior is thought to be driven by activation of nociceptors while the delayed phase 2 behavior has been attributed to central sensitization12,33,37. Persistent inflammatory orofacial pain models activate microglia and astrocytes in the CNS38. We used an in vivo imaging system (IVIS) to determine the efficacy of the Cat B activatable NIRF imaging probe injected directly into the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) at the foramen magnum for in vivo measurement of brain glial activation by the orofacial formalin test. Immunohistochemistry was used to evaluate activation of this compound on glial cells and to ascertain if the probe would alter known protein expression changes.
Methods
Animals
All animal procedures were approved by the New Mexico Veteran’s Administration Health Care System Animal Component of Research Protocol (ACORP 20-A322) and performed in accordance with the National Institute of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (NIH Publications No. 80–23) revised 1996. A total of 12 adult male Sprague–Dawley rats (125–150 g, Envigo, Indianapolis, IN, USA) were used for this study. Animals were housed on a 12/12 reverse light cycle allowing testing during their active period. The rats were fed a soy protein-free diet (Teklad #2920x) ad libitum.
Intracisternal injection of Cat B activable NIRF in vivo imaging probe
Animals were anesthetized with isoflurane (induction: 5% isoflurane in 0.8 L O2; maintenance: 3.5% isoflurane in 0.8 L O2), head and neck shaved, and the skin in the nape of the neck cleaned with betadine, followed by 70% ethanol. Animals were positioned nose down with the superior aspect of the neck hyperextended to palpate the depression of the cisterna cerebellomedullaris between the occipital bone of the skull and the atlas39. A 26-gauge, 5/8-inch long single-use needle attached to a 0.3 ml insulin syringe was inserted along the dorsal midline into the cisterna magna. A volume of 50 μl of the imaging probe (30, 50 or 100 pmol “Cat B 750 FAST”, PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA) diluted in sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) following manufacturer’s instructions was slowly injected. The needle was held in place for an additional 30 s to minimize cerebral spinal fluid and Cat B imaging probe leakage while breathing and heart rate were closely monitored40. The needle was then carefully removed, and the animal allowed to recover in its home cage.
Orofacial formalin test
Four hours after Cat B imaging probe injection, the orofacial formalin test was induced. Animals were anesthetized with isoflurane (5% isoflurane in 0.8 L O2), and 1.5% formalin (50 μl diluted in 0.9% sterile saline; Sigma) was injected subcutaneously into the right upper lip using a 27-gauge needle34. Animals were transferred into a clean cage without bedding and video recorded for the following 40 min for offline quantification of nocifensive behavior, i.e. wiping and scratching of the perinasal area. At the end of the observation period, animals were returned to their home cages.
IVIS Illumina optical imaging system scans
All animals were scanned at multiple time points; once prior to Cat B imaging probe injection, and then at 8, 10, and 28 h post after injection (4, 6, 24 h post upper lip formalin injection). For each scan with the IVIS Illumina Optical Imaging System (PerkinElmer), animals were anesthetized with isoflurane (induction: 5% isoflurane in 0.8 L O2; maintenance: 3.0% isoflurane in 0.6 L O2). Each imaging session lasted 5–10 min. Images were acquired with the Living Image software (PerkinElmer). The fluorescent lamp level was set at high, excitation filter to 745 nm, emission filter to indocyanine green which emits fluorescence between 750–950 nm, and each image was acquired with 20 s exposure time. Each image consisted of a photograph of the animal’s head overlayed by the detected NIRF signal. Fluorescent images were analyzed offline using Aura Imaging software (Spectral Instruments Imaging, Tucson, AZ, USA). Two rectangular regions of interest (ROI) were drawn. The signal ROI (12 mm × 18 mm) was placed over the cerebrum to measure NIRF efficiency signal. The background ROI (3 × 3 mm) was placed on an ear to measure background fluorescence efficiency. It was subtracted from the signal ROI.
Histology
After the final IVIS Illumina Optical Imaging System scan, anesthetized animals (isoflurane 5% isoflurane in 0.8 L O2) were transcardially perfused with 0.1 M phosphate buffer followed by 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M PBS. Brains and trigeminal ganglia were dissected and excised. Fluorescent images of the whole brain were acquired with the IVIS Illumina Optical Imaging System. Then tissue was post fixed, cryoprotected with 30% sucrose solution, embedded in tissue-plus O.C.T. compound (Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), and stored at −80 °C.
Frozen sections of trigeminal ganglia (TG) were horizontally cut (14 μm thickness) and collected on microscopic slides. The sections were washed, blocked, and reacted simultaneously with rabbit anti-ATF3 (Santa Cruz, Dallas, TX, USA; Cat. # sc-188) and mouse anti-CGRP (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA; Cat. # C7113). Primary antibodies were visualized using goat anti-rabbit conjugated to Alexa Fluor 568 and goat anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 647. The slides were scanned using the Olympus Fluoview FV1200 laser scanning confocal microscope and software (Olympus Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Images were analyzed using NIH ImageJ41.
Coronal brain sections at bregma −2.4 to −2.92 mm (40 μm thickness) were collected in PBS. Free floating sections were washed, blocked, and reacted with rabbit anti-Iba1 (1:2000; Wako Chemicals United States, Richmond, VA, USA; Cat. # 019–19,741) or chicken anti-GFAP (Abcam, Waltham, MA, USA; Cat. # ab4674). Primary antibodies were visualized using goat anti-rabbit conjugated to Alexa Fluor 488 and goat anti-chicken Alexa Fluor 488. Images were acquired and analyzed using the Cytation 5 Image Reader (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and Gen 5 software. The Cytation 5 was equipped with a CY7 filter cube (excitation 716/40 nm, emission 809/81 nm) to visualize the NIRF signal from the activated Cat B imaging probe.
Statistical analysis
All data are presented as mean ± standard error of the mean. Behavioral and all fluorescent imaging data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA with Tukey or Fisher LSD post hoc testing or one-way ANOVA where appropriate using GraphPad Prism software (Dotmatics, Boston, MA, USA). A P value of P < 0.05 was considered significant.
Results
Optimization of in vivo imaging of extracellular Cat B
Three different doses of intracisternal Cat B activatable NIRF imaging probe (30, 50, 100 pmol) were tested for their efficacy to detect CNS glial cell activation in vivo up to 24 h after the orofacial formalin test. In vivo imaging of the head in prone position measured NIRF from the activated Cat B imaging probe as fluorescence efficiency (radiance/illumination intensity) using the IVIS Illumina Optical Imaging System at all time points. The highest concentration, 100 pmol, was determined to provide optimal fluorescence efficiency at 28 h post Cat B imaging probe injection (Fig. 1, two-way ANOVA with Tukey post hoc test). At 8 and 10 h post imaging probe injection, the equivalent of 4 and 6 h post orofacial formalin injection, no significant group differences were detected. The detected fluorescent signal was similar to that represented in Fig. 1B.
Cat B imaging probe injection into the CSF did not interfere with nociceptive results of formalin study
All animals showed the typical biphasic nocifensive behavioral response after injection of formalin into the upper lip. The acute phase 1 response was separated by a quiescent 10 min period from the start of phase 2. During phase 1, the 100 pmol Cat B imaging probe group displayed significantly decreased nocifensive behavior compared to the 50 pmol group, while no behavioral differences attributable to the dilutions were detected in phase 2 (Fig. 2, two-way ANOVA with Fisher LSD post hoc test).
Cellular distribution of Cat B imaging probe
Histological analysis of the whisker barrel somatosensory cortex in coronal sections between bregma −2.4 to −2.9 mm was conducted to determine if NIRF fluorescence could be localized on glia. On day 1 after Cat B imaging probe and formalin injections, significantly more NIRF positive microglia were detected bilaterally in the 100 pmol group compared to samples from the two lower concentrations (Fig. 3A, two-way ANOVA with Tukey post hoc test). These microglia had significantly more NIRF fluorescent puncta (Fig. 3B). Similarly, significantly more astrocytes with punctate fluorescent NIRF staining (Fig. 3C), and significantly more NIRF fluorescent puncta per astrocyte (Fig. 3D) were detected in the ipsilateral whisker barrel somatosensory cortex of the 100 pmol group indicative of increased extracellular Cat B. However, on the side contralateral to the formalin injection, no differences were detected (Fig. 3C,D). Figure 3E shows a microglia from the 30 and 100 pmol groups with punctate NIRF fluorescence. No activated Cat B imaging probe fluorescence was detected in the TG (data not shown). Cat B imaging probe injection did not alter immunohistochemical staining of TG for CGRP expressed by peptidergic nociceptors nor transcription factor ATF3, a biomarker for injured neurons. Approximately 35% of all ATF3 positive sensory neurons also expressed CGRP (Fig. 4). No group differences were detected (one-way ANOVA).
Discussion
Glial activation after peripheral inflammation/injury is well documented. The peripheral insult causes hyperactivity in nociceptors, resulting in excess release of neuropeptides and other pro-inflammatory signaling molecules into the CNS. Ramified microglia, innate immune cells of CNS, constantly scan and monitor the environment. During nociceptor hyperactivity, they are activated by released endogenous damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) such as cyclic nucleotides, neuropeptides, and other pro-inflammatory mediators18,42. This can activate microglial purinergic P2X7 receptors, causing lysosomal leakage and increased cytoplasmic Cat B protease which primes NLRP3, resulting in activation of inflammasomes, and interleukin 1β release25,43,44. Changes in subcellular localization of Cat B are critical for its multitude of functions. Typically localized in acidic lysosomes, this cysteine lysosomal protease acts as an exopeptidase and participates in autophagy, protein degradation and recycling autophagy23,45. When secreted into pH neutral environments, Cat B functions as an endopeptidase. It can modify other cytoplasmic and extracellular signaling molecules as well as the extracellular matrix15,20,27,28,46,47.
Subcellular localization of activated Cat B imaging probe NIRF
Extracellular Cat B activity was detected in vivo by using an injected Cat B specific protease-activatable NIRF imaging probe in the IVIS. Histologically, increased extracellular Cat B was evidenced by more NIRF puncta on microglia and astrocytes. Optical imaging stacks taken with the confocal microscope (0.5 μm z-steps) showed a close association of NIRF from the activated Cat B imaging probe with the cell membrane and not in cytoplasmic organelles. To date, injectable protease-activated NIRF probes are designed for the detection of membrane-bound or soluble extracellular proteins29,48. Multiple studies have shown that Cat B is secreted and can be associated with the cell membrane in specialized microdomains such as lipid rafts or caveolae to modulate cell adhesion and receptor molecules or degrade the extracellular membrane28,49,50,51. Cat B is a lysosomal cysteine protease. It is possible that the punctate NIRF signal originated from microdomains in the cell membrane as well as endocytosed Cat B containing vesicles that became part of the endosomal and lysosomal intracellular compartments52.
Central but not peripheral involvement of Cat B in inflammatory pain
The CSF flows from the subarachnoid spaces through sensory ganglia along brain and peripheral nerves53. The finding of activated Cat B probe associated with glial cells in the brain but not in TG point to the role of extracellular Cat B in central but not peripheral aspects of inflammatory pain. This finding is supported by previous observations in experimental inflammatory pain using intraplantar complete Freund’s adjuvant (CFA) injections in a Cat B knock-out mouse model54. Specifically, the authors found that Cat B deficiency or its inhibition did not alter peripheral inflammation, however, spinal microglia did not express or secrete mature IL-1β and IL-18. This indicates that in the periphery, inflammatory cytokines and chemokines mediate pain in a Cat B-independent fashion while centrally, hyperalgesia is dependent on glial Cat B with inflammatory mediators conveying peripheral inflammation to the CNS7,15.
Technical considerations
Each molecule of the compound under study consists of Cat B protease specific peptide chain spacer that connects two NIRF dye molecules. The fluorescence is quenched by their close proximity, and only upon enzymatic cleavage of the peptide chain spacer are the fluorophores released and thus activated31,48. Due to its large size (23 kDa), it is unable to penetrate the intact blood–brain barrier55 and thus applied directly into the CSF with intracisternal injections. All animals survived the injections. Although there were group differences for nocifensive behavior in phase 1 of the orofacial formalin test, none were determined during phase 2. Interactions between intracisternal injection and isoflurane may have caused behavioral variability in the early phase of this inflammatory test that did not have an effect on the late phase56.
It was determined that a 400-fold lower Cat B imaging probe concentration than recommended for intravenous application was needed for optimal fluorescence in our study. In vivo IVIS imaging of the head provided two dimensional pictures of NIRF. The doses tested were within the rising aspect of the dose–response curve. Optimal activated Cat B imaging probe fluorescence is usually 8–12 h after intravenous injection55. However, we noted a signal increase from the 12 to 28h measurements for 100 pmol concentration, which may have been caused by slower fluorophore degradation in the CNS and/or slower fluid distribution in the closed CSF system.
Transcardial perfusion with formaldehyde fixed the released fluorophore from the activated Cat B imaging probe in the tissue, allowing its visualization in tissue sections. We identified punctate NIRF staining on microglia as well as astrocytes 24 h after the inflammatory insult. NIRF intensity was dose dependent comparable to in vivo fluorescence. Microglia had significantly more punctate NIRF staining than astrocytes similar to previous reports that inflammation-induced Cat B expression in microglia is significantly greater compared to other inflammatory cells7,15,57,58. Pro-inflammatory microglia activate astrocytes, which then increase DAMP signaling7. In the present study, we focused on the primary sensory cortex due to limited depth resolution and two-dimensional imaging, limitations in in vivo IVIS. Bilateral concentration dependent differences of punctate microglia staining were not seen with astrocytes. The contralateral staining differences in astrocytes cannot readily be explained and will require additional study.
It is known that inflammatory stimuli activate the CNS pain circuitry. However, as a limitation of the present method, many of the brain regions involved are located deep in the skull, making them inaccessible for this type of in vivo imaging by IVIS. Three-dimensional time course studies are needed to further investigate the role of Cat B in the CNS in inflammatory pain models.
Advantages of using a protease-specific activated NIRF probe to image activated glia
The present method allows for repeated in vivo imaging of the same animal after a single injection of the protease activated NIRF probe. This allows for the establishment of time-course series with a fraction of the animals that ex vivo whole organ imaging or histological analyses would require. It can used in wildtype animals without the need for genetic manipulation. The protease activated NIRF probe has the advantage of visualizing activated glia cells that express extracellular Cat B. There are other protease activated NIRF probes commercially available, allowing for the study of other cell types. The NIRF compound is non-toxic and excreted within several days (according to manufacturer), allowing for repeated injection and in vivo imaging. There are presently 2 established methods for glial imaging in vivo in animal models. An increase of glial cells can be measured in the CNS without the need of a probe using T2-weighted MRI images. Otherwise, a radioactive tracer can be used to label glia prior to PET imaging59. Both methods are financially prohibitive and not available in most animal facilities. Use of protease-cleavable compounds with NIR fluorophores are extremely beneficial for these types of investigations.
Conclusion
The data here demonstrate a time- and concentration-dependent efficacy of extracellular Cat B visualization in activated glia after orofacial formalin was injected. The NIRF probe did not alter known protein expression changes in this inflammatory pain model nor did it affect the nocifensive behavior. Intracisternal injection of this compound is well suited for future studies of extracellular CNS proteinases when the blood–brain barrier is not disrupted.
Data availability
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.
Abbreviations
- Cat B:
-
Cathepsin B
- CFA:
-
Complete Freund’s adjuvant
- CGRP:
-
Calcitonin gene-related peptide
- CNS:
-
Central nervous system
- CSF:
-
Cerebrospinal fluid
- DAMP:
-
Damage-associated molecular pattern
- FAST:
-
Fluorescent activatable sensor technology
- GFAP:
-
Glial fibrillary acidic protein
- IVIS:
-
In Vivo Imaging System
- NIRF:
-
Near-infrared fluorescence
- PBS:
-
Phosphate-buffered saline
- ROI:
-
Region of interest
- TG:
-
Trigeminal ganglion
References
Wieseler-Frank, J., Maier, S. F. & Watkins, L. R. Glial activation and pathological pain. Neurochem. Int. 45, 389–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuint.2003.09.009 (2004).
Trang, T., Beggs, S. & Salter, M. W. Purinoceptors in microglia and neuropathic pain. Pflugers. Arch. 452, 645–652. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00424-006-0074-5 (2006).
Milligan, E. D. & Watkins, L. R. Pathological and protective roles of glia in chronic pain. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 10, 23–36. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2533 (2009).
Vallejo, R., Tilley, D. M., Vogel, L. & Benyamin, R. The role of glia and the immune system in the development and maintenance of neuropathic pain. Pain Pract. 10, 167–184. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-2500.2010.00367.x (2010).
Ji, R. R., Nackley, A., Huh, Y., Terrando, N. & Maixner, W. Neuroinflammation and central sensitization in chronic and widespread pain. Anesthesiology 129, 343–366. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000002130 (2018).
Sommer, C., Leinders, M. & Uceyler, N. Inflammation in the pathophysiology of neuropathic pain. Pain 159, 595–602. https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001122 (2018).
Nakanishi, H. Cathepsin regulation on microglial function. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Proteins Proteom 1868, 140465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbapap.2020.140465 (2020).
Inoue, K., Tsuda, M. & Koizumi, S. ATP- and adenosine-mediated signaling in the central nervous system: Chronic pain and microglia: Involvement of the ATP receptor P2X4. J. Pharmacol. Sci. 94, 112–114. https://doi.org/10.1254/jphs.94.112 (2004).
Hiraga, S. I., Itokazu, T., Nishibe, M. & Yamashita, T. Neuroplasticity related to chronic pain and its modulation by microglia. Inflamm. Regen. 42, 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41232-022-00199-6 (2022).
Parusel, S., Yi, M. H., Hunt, C. L. & Wu, L. J. Chemogenetic and optogenetic manipulations of microglia in chronic pain. Neurosci. Bull. 39, 368–378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12264-022-00937-3 (2023).
Hanisch, U. K. & Kettenmann, H. Microglia: Active sensor and versatile effector cells in the normal and pathologic brain. Nat. Neurosci. 10, 1387–1394. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1997 (2007).
Fu, K. Y., Tan, Y. H., Sung, B. & Mao, J. Peripheral formalin injection induces unique spinal cord microglial phenotypic changes. Neurosci. Lett. 449, 234–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2008.11.009 (2009).
Ma, F., Zhang, L., Lyons, D. & Westlund, K. N. Orofacial neuropathic pain mouse model induced by trigeminal inflammatory compression (TIC) of the infraorbital nerve. Mol. Brain 5, 44. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-6606-5-44 (2012).
Schubert, P. et al. Cascading glia reactions: A common pathomechanism and its differentiated control by cyclic nucleotide signaling. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 903, 24–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2000.tb06346.x (2000).
Nakanishi, H. Microglial cathepsin B as a key driver of inflammatory brain diseases and brain aging. Neural Regen. Res. 15, 25–29. https://doi.org/10.4103/1673-5374.264444 (2020).
Lu, H. J. & Gao, Y. J. Astrocytes in chronic pain: Cellular and molecular mechanisms. Neurosci. Bull. 39, 425–439. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12264-022-00961-3 (2023).
Farber, K. & Kettenmann, H. Physiology of microglial cells. Brain Res. Brain Res. Rev. 48, 133–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresrev.2004.12.003 (2005).
Lowry, J. R. & Klegeris, A. Emerging roles of microglial cathepsins in neurodegenerative disease. Brain Res. Bull. 139, 144–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresbull.2018.02.014 (2018).
Stolzing, A., Sethe, S. & Grune, T. Chronically active: Activation of microglial proteolysis in ageing and neurodegeneration. Redox Rep. 10, 207–213. https://doi.org/10.1179/135100005X70198 (2005).
Pislar, A., Bolcina, L. & Kos, J. New Insights into the role of cysteine cathepsins in neuroinflammation. Biomolecules https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11121796 (2021).
Mort, J. S., Buttle, D. J. & Cathepsin, B. Cathepsin B. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 29, 715–720. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1357-2725(96)00152-5 (1997).
Qi, X. et al. Cathepsin B modulates lysosomal biogenesis and host defense against Francisella novicida infection. J. Exp. Med. 213, 2081–2097. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20151938 (2016).
Cavallo-Medved, D., Moin, K. & Sloane, B. Cathepsin B: Basis Sequence: Mouse. AFCS Nat Mol Pages 2011 (2011).
Ni, J. et al. Increased expression and altered subcellular distribution of cathepsin B in microglia induce cognitive impairment through oxidative stress and inflammatory response in mice. Aging Cell 18, e12856. https://doi.org/10.1111/acel.12856 (2019).
Wendt, W., Schulten, R., Stichel, C. C. & Lubbert, H. Intra- versus extracellular effects of microglia-derived cysteine proteases in a conditioned medium transfer model. J. Neurochem. 110, 1931–1941. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.2009.06283.x (2009).
Terada, K. et al. Involvement of cathepsin B in the processing and secretion of interleukin-1beta in chromogranin A-stimulated microglia. Glia 58, 114–124. https://doi.org/10.1002/glia.20906 (2010).
Ni, J. et al. The critical role of proteolytic relay through cathepsins B and E in the phenotypic change of microglia/macrophage. J. Neurosci. 35, 12488–12501. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1599-15.2015 (2015).
Vidak, E., Javorsek, U., Vizovisek, M. & Turk, B. Cysteine cathepsins and their extracellular roles: shaping the microenvironment. Cells https://doi.org/10.3390/cells8030264 (2019).
Jaffer, F. A. et al. Optical visualization of cathepsin K activity in atherosclerosis with a novel, protease-activatable fluorescence sensor. Circulation 115, 2292–2298. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.660340 (2007).
Calfon, M. A. et al. In vivo near infrared fluorescence (NIRF) intravascular molecular imaging of inflammatory plaque, a multimodal approach to imaging of atherosclerosis. J. Vis. Exp. https://doi.org/10.3791/2257 (2011).
Tung, C. H., Gerszten, R. E., Jaffer, F. A. & Weissleder, R. A novel near-infrared fluorescence sensor for detection of thrombin activation in blood. Chembiochem 3, 207–211 (2002).
Eaton, V. L. et al. Optical tomographic imaging of near infrared imaging agents quantifies disease severity and immunomodulation of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis in vivo. J. Neuroinflammation 10, 138. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-2094-10-138 (2013).
Tjolsen, A., Berge, O. G., Hunskaar, S., Rosland, J. H. & Hole, K. The formalin test: An evaluation of the method. Pain 51, 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(92)90003-T (1992).
Raboisson, P. & Dallel, R. The orofacial formalin test. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 28, 219–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2003.12.003 (2004).
Eisenberg, E., Vos, B. P. & Strassman, A. M. The peripheral antinociceptive effect of morphine in a rat model of facial pain. Neuroscience 72, 519–525. https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-4522(95)00565-x (1996).
Fischer, M. J. et al. Formalin evokes calcium transients from the endoplasmatic reticulum. PLoS One 10, e0123762. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0123762 (2015).
Fu, K. Y., Light, A. R. & Maixner, W. Relationship between nociceptor activity, peripheral edema, spinal microglial activation and long-term hyperalgesia induced by formalin. Neuroscience 101, 1127–1135. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0306-4522(00)00376-6 (2000).
Nascimento, G. C., Lucas, G. & Leite-Panissi, C. R. A. Emerging role of microglia and astrocyte in the affective-motivational response induced by a rat model of persistent orofacial pain. Brain Res. Bull. 195, 86–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresbull.2023.02.005 (2023).
Dos Santos, T. G., Pereira, M. S. L. & Oliveira, D. L. Rat cerebrospinal fluid treatment method through cisterna cerebellomedullaris injection. Neurosci. Bull. 34, 827–832. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12264-018-0223-9 (2018).
Liu, C. H., D’Arceuil, H. E. & de Crespigny, A. J. Direct CSF injection of MnCl(2) for dynamic manganese-enhanced MRI. Magn. Reson. Med. 51, 978–987. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.20047 (2004).
Schneider, C. A., Rasband, W. S. & Eliceiri, K. W. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 671–675. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2089 (2012).
Svensson, C. I. et al. Activation of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase in spinal microglia is a critical link in inflammation-induced spinal pain processing. J. Neurochem. 86, 1534–1544. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1471-4159.2003.01969.x (2003).
Guo, H., Callaway, J. B. & Ting, J. P. Inflammasomes: Mechanism of action, role in disease, and therapeutics. Nat. Med. 21, 677–687. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.3893 (2015).
Campagno, K. E. & Mitchell, C. H. The P2X(7) receptor in microglial cells modulates the endolysosomal axis, autophagy, and phagocytosis. Front Cell Neurosci. 15, 645244. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2021.645244 (2021).
Podobnik, M., Kuhelj, R., Turk, V. & Turk, D. Crystal structure of the wild-type human procathepsin B at 2.5 A resolution reveals the native active site of a papain-like cysteine protease zymogen. J. Mol. Biol. 271, 774–788. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.1997.1218 (1997).
Nagler, D. K. et al. Major increase in endopeptidase activity of human cathepsin B upon removal of occluding loop contacts. Biochemistry 36, 12608–12615. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi971264+ (1997).
Ni, J., Lan, F., Xu, Y., Nakanishi, H. & Li, X. Extralysosomal cathepsin B in central nervous system: Mechanisms and therapeutic implications. Brain Pathol. 32, e13071. https://doi.org/10.1111/bpa.13071 (2022).
Aikawa, E. et al. Osteogenesis associates with inflammation in early-stage atherosclerosis evaluated by molecular imaging in vivo. Circulation 116, 2841–2850. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.732867 (2007).
Monastyrskaya, K., Hostettler, A., Buergi, S. & Draeger, A. The NK1 receptor localizes to the plasma membrane microdomains, and its activation is dependent on lipid raft integrity. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 7135–7146. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M405806200 (2005).
Cavallo-Medved, D. et al. Live-cell imaging demonstrates extracellular matrix degradation in association with active cathepsin B in caveolae of endothelial cells during tube formation. Exp. Cell Res. 315, 1234–1246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yexcr.2009.01.021 (2009).
de Laurentiis, A., Donovan, L. & Arcaro, A. Lipid rafts and caveolae in signaling by growth factor receptors. Open Biochem. J. 1, 12–32. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874091X00701010012 (2007).
Bi, X., Pinkstaff, J., Nguyen, K., Gall, C. M. & Lynch, G. Experimentally induced lysosomal dysfunction disrupts processing of hypothalamic releasing factors. J. Comp. Neurol. 401, 382–394 (1998).
Bechter, K. & Schmitz, B. Cerebrospinal fluid outflow along lumbar nerves and possible relevance for pain research: Case report and review. Croat. Med. J. 55, 399–404. https://doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2014.55.399 (2014).
Sun, L. et al. Microglial cathepsin B contributes to the initiation of peripheral inflammation-induced chronic pain. J. Neurosci. 32, 11330–11342. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0677-12.2012 (2012).
Lin, S. A. et al. Quantitative longitudinal imaging of vascular inflammation and treatment by ezetimibe in apoE Mice by FMT using new optical imaging biomarkers of cathepsin activity and alpha(v)beta(3) Integrin. Int. J. Mol. Imaging 2012, 189254. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/189254 (2012).
Lopes, D. M., Cater, H. L., Thakur, M., Wells, S. & McMahon, S. B. A refinement to the formalin test in mice. F1000Res 8, 891. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.18338.2 (2019).
Banati, R. B., Rothe, G., Valet, G. & Kreutzberg, G. W. Detection of lysosomal cysteine proteinases in microglia: Flow cytometric measurement and histochemical localization of cathepsin B and L. Glia 7, 183–191. https://doi.org/10.1002/glia.440070208 (1993).
Murphy, N. & Lynch, M. A. Activation of the P2X(7) receptor induces migration of glial cells by inducing cathepsin B degradation of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 1. J. Neurochem. 123, 761–770. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnc.12031 (2012).
Ardaya, M. et al. In vivo PET imaging of gliogenesis after cerebral ischemia in rats. Front Neurosci. 14, 793. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2020.00793 (2020).
Funding
This work was supported by the United States Department of Veterans Affairs, VA Merit Grant, No. BX002695 and the BRINM 217 Winkler Bacterial Overgrowth Research Fund.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
S.L.M. designed and performed the animal experiments, data analysis, produced the figures, wrote the manuscript; A.C.C.-P. assisted with animal experiments and data analysis, read, and edited the manuscript; H.C.L. read and edited this manuscript; K.N.W. designed the study, read, and edited this manuscript. All authors discussed the results, commented on the manuscript, and approved the final version of the article.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
McIlwrath, S.L., Carroll-Portillo, A.C., Lin, H.C. et al. In vivo imaging of cathepsin B in activated glia in the brain after orofacial formalin test. Sci Rep 14, 4517 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-52854-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-52854-2
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.