Abstract
Metal or metal cluster-doped zeolites catalyse a wide variety of reactions. In this work, a coupling reaction between bromobenzene and phenylboronic acid to yield biphenyl with the Pd–H-Beta zeolite catalyst was investigated with density functional theory (DFT) calculations. Utilizing a model system with tetrahedral Pd4 clusters within the H-Beta zeolite, it was demonstrated that the catalyst exhibited notable reactivity by effectively reducing the activation energy barrier for the reaction. Our investigation revealed that the zeolite framework facilitated electron transfer to the Pd cluster, thereby increasing the reaction activity. The coupling reaction was shown to be exothermic and comprise three main steps: oxidative addition of bromobenzene (C6H5Br), transmetallation with phenylboronic acid (C6H5B(OH)2), and reductive elimination of biphenyl (C12H10). Specifically, in the transmetallation step, which was the rate-determining step, the C–B bond breaking in phenylboronic acid (C6H5B(OH)2) and the phenylboronate anion (C6H5B(OH)3–) were compared under neutral and basic conditions, respectively. This comprehensive study clarifies the mechanism for the reaction with the modified Pd zeolite catalyst and highlights the essential role of the zeolite framework.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Suzuki–Miyaura cross-coupling is a reliable approach for organic synthesis, and it is a highly selective method for creating C–C bonds with high yields under mild conditions1,2. It was originally developed with homogeneous catalysts by Heck, Negishi and Suzuki et al.1,3, and various modifications of the reaction have been reported since then. Recently, reactions producing high-value molecules have been achieved with heterogeneous catalysts such as anchored nanoparticles on metal oxides and nanoparticle dispersions in liquid media4,5,6,7,8. For example, biaryl derivatives can be produced from aryl halides and aryl boronic acid with Au/Pd alloy nanoparticles or Pd-zeolite catalysts5,8,9.
The use of a palladium zeolite catalyst has been explored for cross-coupling reactions to synthesize unsymmetric biaryls from aryl halides and aryl boronic acids9,10,11,12. This catalyst holds significant promise for syntheses of fine chemicals in pharmaceuticals and agrochemicals fields13. The capabilities of these catalysts have been assessed with specific zeolites such as FAU9,11, BEA12 and ZSM-510,14. Notably, the Pd siliceous ZSM-5 zeolite catalysed the Suzuki–Miyaura cross-coupling reaction with a low Pd loading under ambient conditions10. By employing K2CO3 in ethanol as the base with this catalyst, the coupling reaction of bromobenzene and phenylboronic acid yielded biphenyl with a high yield of 96%. Furthermore, Pd-zeolites have been utilized for NOx decomposition15 and methane oxidation16,17,18,19. Among the various Pd-zeolite catalysts, Pd-Beta zeolite exhibits notable shape selectivity for coupling reactions due to its large specific pore sizes12,20. The Pd-Beta zeolite shows superior catalytic activity and recyclability in comparison to other catalysts. Its larger pores allow efficient encapsulation of aggregated Pd species, thereby enhancing the catalytic performance. Additionally, the active Pd species are effectively immobilized by the negative charges in the zeolite framework, which also contributes to the enhanced activity and stability.
However, theoretical investigations of Pd zeolite heterogeneous catalysts have been limited thus far. Moc et al. conducted density functional theory (DFT) calculations on a Pd4 cluster within a zeolite to examine dissociation of the H2 molecule, and specifically utilized a siliceous FAU zeolite as the support21. In their work, the Pd4 cluster was found to be stable in the triplet state of the tetrahedral (Td) structure. The reverse-hydrogen spillover process was also investigated with the Pd4 cluster on the H-FAU zeolite22. A hybrid quantum–mechanical/molecular-mechanics (QM/MM) method was used to study the Au and Au–Pd clusters with Td structures within the TS-1 zeolite23. Furthermore, periodic DFT calculations using Pd clusters with various sizes in MOR zeolite were performed to examine the adsorption of NO24. However, theoretical studies on the coupling reactions catalysed with Pd-zeolites remain limited because of the complexity and large computational cost. Zeolites are widely employed as cost-effective and environmentally friendly catalysts, and investigating the coupling reactions within Pd zeolite catalysts holds significant potential to enhance our understanding of the reaction mechanisms and enable catalyst improvements.
Derouane proposed the concept of the zeolite framework effect or confinement effect for the adsorption and reactions inside the zeolite25. However, accurately representing the confinement effect in DFT calculations requires careful selection of the functionals. Standard hybrid DFT functionals are inadequate for describing the confinement effects, so the M06 series of functionals was adopted to study substrate adsorption and reactions in zeolite frameworks26,27,28. The M06 functional group provides high-quality results, as demonstrated in numerous previous studies on hydrocarbon adsorption and the reaction mechanisms of zeolites27,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36. In particular, the M06-L functional26 has been used to investigate the mechanisms of reactions occurring on gold-30,32, iron-29 and vanadium-modified31 zeolites. Additionally, it has been used for different zeolites with various pore sizes, such as FER, ZSM-5, FAU, and MCM-22, which are used in methane activation32. The M06 functional was used to study the synthesis of coumarin with the large pore Beta zeolite33. More recently, the M06-L functional was used to study the conversion of ethanol to acetaldehyde over zinc Beta Zeolite37. These functionals effectively described the confinement effects of the zeolites, and the theoretical studies described the differences among zeolites with various pore sizes and stabilization of the transition states for metal-zeolites. By comparing the experimental results with the theoretical calculations, valuable insights into the reaction mechanisms were obtained.
In this study, DFT calculations and the M06-L functional were used to investigate the Suzuki–Miyaura coupling reaction between bromobenzene and phenylboronic acid over Pd–H-Beta zeolite. Our primary focus in this study was on a theoretical exploration of this reaction with heterogeneous Pd catalysts supported on H-Beta zeolite and the influence of the base. This study represents the first comprehensive investigation of the mechanisms for coupling reactions involving Pd–H-Beta zeolite catalysts. To simulate the coupling reaction and represent the Pd–H-Beta zeolite, we utilized the Pd4 cluster with the 34T system33, where T denotes tetrahedral coordination of the Si or Al atoms. The results of our study demonstrate that the cross-coupling reaction proceeds similarly to those with standard homogeneous Pd catalysts6. This research provides a comprehensive understanding of the reaction mechanisms and energetics of heterogeneous Pd zeolite catalysts.
Results and discussion
Structure of Pd4–H-beta zeolite
First, the stable structures and coordination modes of the Pd4 clusters within the H-Beta zeolite were explored by optimizing various initial structures. The isolated Pd cluster had a stable structure and was a triplet-state tetrahedral Pd4 cluster. The clusters were predominantly located above the Brønsted acid sites in the 12T straight channels of the beta zeolite, where the coupling reactions occur. As shown by a literature review, the Pd4 clusters inside zeolites are tetrahedral clusters21,23,24. Two modes for Pd4 cluster adsorption on the H-Beta zeolite were identified. The first involved adsorption of the Pd4 clusters over the Brønsted acid sites, as depicted in Fig. 1a. The second type involved complete proton transfer from the Brønsted acid to the Pd4 cluster, as shown in Fig. 1b. The corresponding energies for adsorption of the Pd4 clusters on H-Beta zeolite were − 152.3 and − 181.1 kcal mol-1, respectively. The latter structure was more stable and exhibited higher activity for the reaction.
Structures of the Pd4-H-Beta zeolite Model 34T quantum cluster optimized by the M06-L/6-31G(d,p) + LANL2DZ calculations (distances are in Å).
The calculated structure of the Pd4–H-Beta zeolite was analysed. The calculated average Al–O bond distance of the 34T Pd4–H-Beta zeolite framework was within the range of 1.69–1.74 Å. The Pd4 cluster was slightly deformed, and the Pd–Pd bond distances were 2.62–2.67 Å. Notably, the proton from the zeolite was transferred to the Pd4 cluster, resulting in Pd–H bond distances of 1.69 and 1.71 Å. Furthermore, the Pd cluster interacted with the zeolite framework, and the Pd⋅⋅⋅O bond distances ranged from 2.38 to 2.64 Å. These values were consistent the extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) analysis; the Pd⋅⋅⋅O distances were within the range of 2.74–2.76 Å for small Pd clusters on Na-X FAU zeolite38.
Charge transfer from three bridging oxygen atoms of the zeolite framework to the Pd cluster was also observed, resulting in an increase in the electron density of the Pd4 cluster. The Mulliken charge of the Pd4 cluster inside the H-Beta zeolite was analysed. The charge transfer to the Pd4 cluster, which was approximately − 0.57 |e|, left a charge on the zeolite of + 0.57 |e|. Because of the confinement effect resulting from the presence of the 34T quantum cluster around the Pd cluster, the oxygen framework of the zeolite functioned as a Lewis base39 by transferring electrons to the Pd cluster. The anionic Pd cluster exhibited oxidation by lowering the activation barrier40. In addition, we examined the possible spin states of the Pd4-H-Beta system, including the singlet to quintet spin states. Among these, the most stable spin state was found to be the triplet state. These results agreed with previous calculations for the Pd4-FAU zeolite21.
Coupling reaction of bromobenzene with phenylboronic acid on the Pd4–H-beta zeolite
The coupling of bromobenzene and phenylboronic acid on Pd4–H-Beta, which formed biphenyl as the major product, was investigated. The standard catalytic cycle for the coupling reaction was assumed under neutral conditions, and phenylboronic acid C6H5B(OH)2 was considered as the substrate. Additionally, we also considered the case for phenylboronate C6H5B(OH)3– under basic conditions, as shown later. As depicted in Fig. 2, the reaction proceeded through a catalytic cycle consisting of three steps: oxidative addition of the bromobenzene, transmetalation with phenylboronic acid and reductive elimination of biphenyl. The calculated energy profiles are shown in Figs. 3, 4 and 5.
The catalytic cycle for coupling of bromobenzene and phenylboronic acid over the Pd–H-Beta zeolite.
Energy profile for the oxidative addition of bromobenzene on Pd–H-Beta zeolite determined with M06-L/6-311G(d,p) + Lanl2DZ//M06-L/6-31G(d,p) + Lanl2DZ DFT calculations (distances are in Å).
In the first step, oxidative addition, the C–Br of bromobenzene is broken, and C-Pd and Br-Pd bonds are formed with the Pd4–H-Beta zeolite. Initially, bromobenzene is adsorbed on the Pd4–H-Beta system (AD1), with the Br atom pointing towards Pd (Br-Pd distance is 2.68 Å). At AD1, the Pd–Pd bond length increases from 2.62 to 2.68 Å, while the other geometrical changes are minor; the C1–Br bond increases by only 0.06 Å. At this step, the Mulliken charge of the Pd4 cluster is changed to − 0.75 |e|, that of the zeolite framework is + 0.59 |e|, and that of C6H5Br is + 0.16 |e|. For the adsorption process, we found that C6H5Br acts as a Lewis basis by transferring electrons to the Pd4–H-Beta zeolite framework. Charge reorganization occurs from the Br atom to the Pd cluster, which increases the Coulomb interaction. The Gibbs free energy for adsorption of bromobenzene on Pd4–H-Beta was calculated as − 10.0 kcal mol−1.
Bromobenzene undergoes dissociative chemisorption on Pd4–H-Beta to form the intermediate (IN1) through oxidative addition. This step is exothermic and releases 12.7 kcal mol-1. At the transition state, TS1, the C1–Br bond breaks, while the Pd1-C and Pd2-Br bonds simultaneously form. The imaginary frequency was calculated to be 134i cm−1. In TS1, the C1–Br bond length increases from 1.97 to 2.41 Å, while the Pd1-C1 bond contracts to 2.03 Å. The Pd1–Pd2 bond increases to 2.64 Å. The activation energy calculated for this step was 2.6 kcal mol−1. Comparatively, the present Pd catalyst displays high activity in the oxidative addition step. For instance, the activation energies calculated with the M06 functional41 were 9.6 kcal mol−1 for bromobenzene on Pd(PPh3)2, 12.6 kcal mol−1 for chlorobenzene on Au10Pd10 cluster7, 44.6 kcal mol−1 for iodobenzene on Au20 with M05-2X calculation42, and 9.3 kcal mol−1 for Au10Pd10-4PVP catalysts40. In IN1, benzene is bonded to the Pd1 atom with a Pd1-C1 distance of 1.97 Å. The Br atom is bridged by two Pd atoms with distances of 2.65 and 2.68 Å. This intermediate has a relative energy of − 22.7 kcal mol−1. At this step, the Pd4 cluster can be oxidized, since the Mullikan charge of the Pd4 cluster is − 0.66 |e|, the charge for bromobenzene is − 0.01 |e| and that for the zeolite is + 0.67 |e|.
The next step of the reaction is transmetalation, which is initiated by the adsorption of phenylboronic acid followed by C–B bond breaking (Fig. 4). Phenylboronic acid is adsorbs on a different Pd site of the Pd4–H-Beta in the zeolite channel, and an interaction between the phenyl ring and the Pd cluster yields a Pd–C distance of 2.49 Å (AD2). The relative energy of AD2 is − 19.3 kcal mol−1. The transition state (TS2) involves C–B bond breaking of phenylboronic acid to form the IN2 intermediate. At TS2, C–B bond-breaking and formation of the Pd–C and Pd–B bonds constitute the reaction coordinate, with one imaginary frequency of 207i cm−1. The activation energy for this step is as large as 36.8 kcal mol−1. This step was found to be the rate determining step of the coupling reaction. In IN2, the C2-B bond is dissociated at the Pd3 atom, and C2 forms bonds with two Pd atoms to give bond distances of 2.05 and 2.24 Å. Although the relative energy of IN2 is − 29.9 kcal mol−1, the subsequent step yielding biphenyl is highly exothermic.
Energy profile for transmetalation with phenylboronic acid on the Pd–H-Beta zeolite, as determined with M06-L/6-311G(d,p) + Lanl2DZ//M06-L/6-31G(d,p) + Lanl2DZ DFT calculations (distances are in Å).
The last step is C–C bond formation and elimination of the biphenyl (Fig. 5). The transition state for this step (TS3) corresponds to formation of the C–C bond with one imaginary frequency of 240i cm−1. At TS3, the C1–C2 bond length is 2.20 Å, and the Pd-C1 bond length increases from 1.99 to 2.05 Å. This step requires an activation energy of 17.7 kcal mol-1. The biphenyl product is adsorbed on the cluster through an interaction between the phenyl ring and the Pd cluster, with a C2-Pd bond distance of 2.42 Å. The relative energy of the product PR1 is − 54.5 kcal mol-1. Biphenyl is desorbed from the Pd cluster with a desorption energy of 24.2 kcal mol-1. Transmetalation was found to be the rate-determining step of the coupling reaction. The present results are consistent with previous calculations in which this step of the reaction has a high activation energy with organoboronic acid and neutral conditions, but the reaction has a low energy barrier under basic conditions (OH−)43.
Energy profile for the reductive elimination of biphenyl on Pd–H-Beta zeolite, determined with M06-L/6-311G(d,p) + Lanl2DZ//M06-L/6-31G(d,p) + Lanl2DZ DFT calculations (distances are in Å).
The basic conditions may facilitate the reaction by forming the phenylboronate anion, C6H5B(OH)3–, which is more reactive and would reduce the activation barrier. Thus, the reaction mechanism operating under basic conditions was examined and is shown in Fig. 6. The energy profile for the basic system is shown in Figs. 7 and 8. In experiments with Pd-ZSM-510, Pd-FAU9,12, Pd-Beta12,20 and Pd-catalysts6,43, it was shown that this step was accelerated by the base and solvent. The structures of the intermediates formed from C6H5B(OH)3– are shown in Fig. 6. Adsorption of the phenylboronate anion with the loss of a bromide ion (Br–) gives the transient intermediate (AD4) with a relative energy of − 31.7 kcal mol-1. Then, the C–B bond breaks via the transition state (TS4) with an imaginary frequency at 212i cm−1. This step proceeds with an activation energy of 30.5 kcal mol-1. The activation barrier for the system with the phenylboronate anion is lower than that seen with phenylboronic acid by approximately 6.3 kcal mol−1. This step produces IN4 with a relative energy of − 48.7 kcal mol−1. The reaction with the phenylboronate anion also produces the intermediate IN4, which is more stable than IN2. Under basic conditions, this step is exothermic by approximately 18.8 kcal mol−1. Boric acid (B(OH)3) can be desorbed from IN4 to give product PR2. The desorption energy for boric acid is approximately 7.3 kcal mol−1.
Catalytic cycle for the coupling reaction of bromobenzene and phenylboronate anion over Pd–H-Beta zeolite.
Energy profile for the transmetalation with phenylboronate anion on Pd–H-Beta zeolite, as determined with M06-L/6-311G(d,p) + Lanl2DZ//M06-L/6-31G(d,p) + Lanl2DZ DFT calculations (distances are in Å).
Energy profile for the reductive elimination of biphenyl from the Pd–H-Beta zeolite, as determined with M06-L/6-311G(d,p) + Lanl2DZ//M06-L/6-31G(d,p) + Lanl2DZ DFT calculations (distances are in Å).
For the phenylboronate anion pathway, the elimination of biphenyl occurs via IN4 to give PR2. The structure of the transition state TS4, in which C–C bond formation occurs, is similar to that of TS3. One imaginary frequency at 153i cm−1 was found. This step requires an activation energy of 14.4 kcal mol−1. Biphenyl is the product of this step and has a relative energy of − 83.7 kcal mol−1. Biphenyl is desorbed from the Pd-zeolite cluster with a desorption energy of 21.0 kcal mol−1.
Biphenyl is the main product of the coupling reaction. During the reaction occurring under basic condition, the Br– anion and B(OH)2+ cation are produced and form B2(OH)4, BrB(OH)2 and B(OH)38,43. For example, two B(OH)2+ species from two phenylboronic acids (C6H5B(OH)2) form tetrahydroxydiborane B2(OH)4. In the phenylboronic acid pathway, the reaction produces BrB(OH)2 with a formation energy of − 24.8 kcal mol−1 relative to the isolated molecules or ions. Desorption of the BrB(OH)2 requires an energy of 5.5 kcal mol−1. At this step, the water solvent reacts with BrB(OH)2 to produce boric acid [B(OH)3] and HBr. The formation energy including the water (C6H5Br + C6H5B(OH)2 + H2O → C12H10 + B(OH)3 + HBr) is − 41.1 kcal mol−1. Water molecules are used in proceeding to the latter step to form boric acid. For the phenylboronate anion pathway, the reaction produces boric acid B(OH)3 and the Br− anion with a formation energy of approximately − 55.4 kcal mol−1.
Differences in the energetics for the phenylboronic acid and phenylboronate anion transmetallation steps are clearly seen in Figs. 4 and 7. In the case with basic condition, the activation energy barriers after IN2 (30.5 and 14.4 kcal mol−1) are lower than those of the neutral case (36.8 and 17.7 kcal mol−1). Additionally, the product PR2 is more stable than the neutral product PR1. This means that the base facilitates the coupling reaction both kinetically and thermodynamically. We found that the supported zeolite framework has a significant impact on the activity of the Pd4 cluster. This is consistent with our previous work describing N2O decomposition30 and methane activation32 on Au-supported zeolites, which showed lower activation energies with the zeolite framework compared to those of the bare metal system. Moreover, the supported zeolite framework also provides the electron and converts the Pd4 cluster into an anionic species, which is found to catalyse the reaction44,45.
Summary
The coupling of bromobenzene and phenylboronic acid on Pd–H-Beta zeolite was investigated with DFT calculations using the M06-L functional. The Pd4–34T–H-Beta model system was used to simulate the coupling reaction. In the Pd–H-Beta model, the bridged oxygen atoms donate electron density to activate the Pd cluster for the adsorption and coupling reactions. The mechanism for the coupling reaction consists of three steps: oxidative addition, transmetalation and reductive elimination. Oxidative addition of bromobenzene occurs at the active palladium site, which forms the intermediate with an activation barrier of 2.6 kcal mol−1. The second step, in which breaking of the C–B bond in phenylboronic acid occurs, was found to be the rate-determining step with an activation energy of 36.8 kcal mol−1. The activation energy for reductive elimination is approximately 17.7 kcal mol−1. The effect of the base was also studied with the phenylboronate anion. We found that the base facilitates a reaction, in which the calculated activation energies are only 30.5 and 14.4 kcal mol−1 for the second and third steps, respectively. The cross-coupling reaction proceeds exothermically with the production of biphenyl. We simulated the confinement effects of the zeolite framework and the impacts on the adsorption and the coupling reactions on the Pd–H-Beta zeolite and showed how the base facilitated the reaction.
Methodology
The Pd–H-Beta zeolite catalyst was utilized to investigate the coupling reaction so as to take advantage of its ion-exchange capability, thermal stability, and size and shape selectivity. The effectiveness of the Beta zeolite in various hydrocarbon reactions is widely acknowledged, including the Pechmann condensation33, dimethylnaphthalene isomerisation46, and coupling reactions12,20,47,48,49,50,51. To model the Pd–H-Beta zeolite, a 34T cluster model, with T representing tetrahedral coordination of the Si or Al atoms, was generated from the Beta lattice structure52, including the intersections of the straight channels, as depicted in Fig. 1. Previous studies have shown that this model predicts the adsorption and activation energies of hydrocarbons while demonstrating good agreement with the experimental values33,37,53. Various configurations and locations of the Pd4 cluster within the zeolite pores were tested, and the 12T channel over a Brønsted acid site was identified as the preferred location for the Pd4 cluster.
The DFT method and the M06-L functional was used to calculate the structures and the energy profiles of the coupling reaction on the 34T quantum cluster of the Pd–H-Beta zeolite. The M06 family of functionals, including the M06-L method developed by Zhao and Truhlar, is known to be effective in studying various properties, such as thermochemistry, kinetics, noncovalent interactions, excited states, and transition properties26,28. Moreover, the M06-L method accurately represents the effects of the zeolite framework27,28. In the DFT calculations, the 6-31G(d,p) basis set was used for the Al, Si, O, C and H atoms, while the relativistic effective core potential (RECP) with the LANL2DZ basis set was adopted for the Pd and Br atoms. To contain the zeolite framework during geometry optimization, only the active regions [Si3O3Al(OH)Si] and probe molecules were allowed to relax, while the rest were kept fixed at the crystallographic structure52. The 34T Model H-Beta zeolite33 and H-ZSM-5 zeolite27 were studied with the M06 functional and provided adsorption and activation energies that compared well with experimental data. The transition states were confirmed through normal mode analyses, which revealed one imaginary frequency mode corresponding to the reaction coordinate. Throughout the investigation, various spin states were examined, and the lowest spin state, predominantly a triplet state, remained during both the adsorption and the reaction process without spin crossing events. Gibbs free energy corrections (Gcorr) were calculated at 298.15 K and 1 atm. Additionally, to improve the accuracy of energy, single-point calculations were performed with the 6-311G(d,p) basis set for the Al, Si, O, C and H atoms and the RECP with LANL2DZ basis set for the Pd and Br atoms. The resulting free energies with free energy corrections (E0 + Gcorr) were reported for all reaction pathways. Cartesian coordinates of all the optimized structures are provided in the Supplementary information file. All calculations were performed with the Gaussian 09 program version D0154.
Data availability
All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.
References
Miyaura, N. & Suzuki, A. Palladium-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions of organoboron compounds. Chem. Rev. 95, 2457–2483. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr00039a007 (1995).
Suzuki, A. Recent advances in the cross-coupling reactions of organoboron derivatives with Organic electrophiles, 1995–1998. J. Organomet. Chem 576, 147–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-328X(98)01055-9 (1999).
Negishi, E. I. & Anastasia, L. Palladium-catalyzed alkynylation. Chem. Rev. 103, 1979–2017. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr020377i (2003).
Barder, T. E., Walker, S. D., Martinelli, J. R. & Buchwald, S. L. Catalysts for Suzuki–Miyaura coupling processes: Scope and studies of the effect of ligand structure. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 4685–4696. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja042491j (2005).
Littke, A. F. & Fu, G. C. Palladium-catalyzed coupling reactions of aryl chlorides. Angew. Chem. 41, 4176–4211. https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-3773(20021115)41:22%3c4176::AID-ANIE4176%3e3.0.CO;2-U (2002).
García-Melchor, M., Braga, A. A. C., Lledós, A., Ujaque, G. & Maseras, F. Computational perspective on Pd-catalyzed C-C cross-coupling reaction mechanisms. Acc. Chem. Res. 46, 2626–2634. https://doi.org/10.1021/ar400080r (2013).
Dhital, R. N. et al. Low-temperature carbon-chlorine bond activation by bimetallic gold/palladium alloy nanoclusters: An application to Ullmann coupling. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 20250–20253. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja309606k (2012).
Dhital, R. N. & Sakurai, H. Anomalous efficacy of bimetallic Au/Pd nanoclusters in C-Cl bond activation and formal metathesis-type C-B bond activation at room temperature. Chem. Lett. 41, 630–632. https://doi.org/10.1246/cl.2012.630 (2012).
Artok, L. & Bulut, H. Heterogeneous Suzuki reactions catalyzed by Pd(0)-Y zeolite. Tetrahedron Lett. 45, 3881–3884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tetlet.2004.03.126 (2004).
Kumbhar, A., Kamble, S., Mane, A., Jha, R. & Salunkhe, R. Modified zeolite immobilized palladium for ligand-free Suzuki–Miyaura cross-coupling reaction. J. Organomet. Chem. 738, 29–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jorganchem.2013.03.031 (2013).
Djakovitch, L. & Koehler, K. Heck reaction catalyzed by Pd-modified zeolites. J. Am Chem. Soc. 123, 5990–5999. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja001087r (2001).
Corma, A., García, H. & Leyva, A. Bifunctional palladium-basic zeolites as catalyst for Suzuki reaction. Appl. Catal. A 236, 179–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-860X(02)00285-5 (2002).
Kumbhar, A. Palladium catalyst supported on zeolite for cross-coupling reactions: An overview of recent advances. Top. Curr. Chem. 375, 2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41061-016-0084-5 (2017).
Li, G., Edwards, J., Carley, A. F. & Hutchings, G. J. Direct synthesis of hydrogen peroxide from H2 and O2 using zeolite-supported Au-Pd catalysts. Catal. Today 122, 361–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2007.01.019 (2007).
Bian, C. et al. Recent progress of Pd/zeolite as passive NOx adsorber: Adsorption chemistry, structure-performance relationships, challenges and prospects. Chin. Chem. Lett. 33, 1169–1179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cclet.2021.07.066 (2022).
Fan, C. et al. A highly active Pd/H-ZSM-5 catalyst in lean methane combustion prepared: Via a sol-gel method and treated by reduction-oxidation. New J. Chem. 44, 3940–3949. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0nj00212g (2020).
Friberg, I. et al. Structure and performance of zeolite supported Pd for complete methane oxidation. Catal. Today 382, 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2020.11.026 (2021).
Xie, Y., Meng, X., Gao, S., Wu, Z. & Xiao, F. S. Catalytic performances in methane combustion over Pd nanoparticles supported on pure silica zeolites with different structures. Micropor. Mesopor. Mater. 346, 112298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2022.112298 (2022).
Xue, W. & Mei, D. Mechanistic understanding of methane combustion over H-SSZ-13 zeolite encapsulated palladium nanocluster catalysts. Chem. Eng. J. 444, 136671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2022.136671 (2022).
Vercammen, J. et al. Shape-selective C–H activation of aromatics to biarylic compounds using molecular palladium in zeolites. Nat. Catal. 3, 1002–1009. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41929-020-00533-6 (2020).
Moc, J., Musaev, D. G. & Morokuma, K. Zeolite-supported palladium tetramer and its reactivity toward H2 molecules: Computational studies. J. Phys. Chem. A 112, 5973–5983. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp711403x (2008).
Kalita, B. & Deka, R. C. Investigation of reverse-hydrogen spillover on zeolite-supported palladium tetramer by ONIOM method. J. Phys. Chem. C 113, 16070–16076. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp901313n (2009).
Joshi, A. M., Delgass, W. N. & Thomson, K. T. Adsorption of small Aun (n = 1–5) and Au-Pd clusters inside the TS-1 and S-1 pores. J. Phys. Chem. B 110, 16439–16451. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp061754o (2006).
Grybos, R., Benco, L., Bučko, T. & Hafner, J. Molecular adsorption and metal-support interaction for transition-metal clusters in zeolites: NO adsorption on Pdn (n=1-6) clusters in mordenite. J. Chem. Phys. 130, 104503. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3079542 (2009).
Derouane, E. G. Zeolites as solid solvents. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem 134, 29–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1381-1169(98)00021-1 (1998).
Zhao, Y. & Truhlar, D. G. The M06 suite of density functionals for main group thermochemistry, thermochemical kinetics, noncovalent interactions, excited states, and transition elements: two new functionals and systematic testing of four M06-class functionals and 12 other functionals. Theor. Chem. Acc. 120, 215–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00214-007-0310-x (2008).
Boekfa, B., Choomwattana, S., Khongpracha, P. & Limtrakul, J. Effects of the zeolite framework on the adsorptions and hydrogen-exchange reactions of unsaturated aliphatic, aromatic, and heterocyclic compounds in ZSM-5 zeolite: A combination of perturbation theory (MP2) and a newly developed density functional theory (M06–2X) in ONIOM scheme. Langmuir 25, 12990–12999. https://doi.org/10.1021/la901841w (2009).
Zhao, Y. & Truhlar, D. G. Benchmark data for interactions in zeolite model complexes and their use for assessment and validation of electronic structure methods. J. Phys. Chem. C 112, 6860–6868. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp7112363 (2008).
Maihom, T., Khongpracha, P., Sirijaraensre, J. & Limtrakul, J. Mechanistic studies on the transformation of ethanol into ethene over Fe-ZSM-5 zeolite. ChemPhysChem 14, 101–107. https://doi.org/10.1002/cphc.201200786 (2013).
Maihom, T., Wannakao, S., Boekfa, B. & Limtrakul, J. Density functional study of the activity of gold-supported ZSM-5 zeolites for nitrous oxide decomposition. Chem. Phys. Lett. 556, 217–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2012.11.058 (2013).
Wannakao, S., Boekfa, B., Khongpracha, P., Probst, M. & Limtrakul, J. Oxidative dehydrogenation of propane over a VO2-exchanged MCM-22 zeolite: A DFT study. ChemPhysChem 11, 3432–3438. https://doi.org/10.1002/cphc.201000586 (2010).
Wannakao, S., Warakulwit, C., Kongpatpanich, K., Probst, M. & Limtrakul, J. Methane activation in gold cation-exchanged zeolites: A DFT study. ACS Catal. 2, 986–992. https://doi.org/10.1021/cs200653q (2012).
Klinyod, S. et al. Theoretical and experimental study on the 7-hydroxy-4-methylcoumarin synthesis with h-beta zeolite. ChemistrySelect 4, 10660–10667. https://doi.org/10.1002/slct.201902596 (2019).
Zhao, P. et al. Theoretical study on 31P NMR chemical shifts of phosphorus-modified CHA zeolites. Micropor. Mesopor. Mater. 294, 109908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2019.109908 (2020).
Maeboonruan, N. et al. Adsorption and dehydration of ethanol on isomorphously B, Al, and Ga substituted H-ZSM-5 zeolite: an embedded ONIOM study. J. Mol. Model. 27, 354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00894-021-04979-8 (2021).
Paluka, V. et al. Density functional study of the effect of cation exchanged Sn-Beta zeolite for the diels-alder reaction between furan and methyl acrylate. Chem. Phys. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2020.137743 (2020).
Jeevapong, W. et al. Density functional and coupled cluster study on the conversion of ethanol to acetaldehyde on isolated zinc sites supported on dealuminated BEA zeolite. J. Phys. Chem. C 127, 8473–8481. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.3c01170 (2023).
Moller, K., Koningsberger, D. C. & Bein, T. Stabilization of metal ensembles at room temperature: palladium clusters in zeolites. J. Phys. Chem. 93, 6116–6120. https://doi.org/10.1021/j100353a033 (1989).
Huang, M., Kaliaguine, S., Auroux, A., Bonneviot, L. & Kaliaguine, S. Lewis basic and Lewis acidic sites in zeolites. Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal. 97, 311–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2991(06)81903-8 (1995).
Boekfa, B. et al. C−Cl bond activation on Au/Pd bimetallic nanocatalysts studied by density functional theory and genetic algorithm calculations. J. Phys. Chem. C 118, 22188–22196. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp5074472 (2014).
Vikse, K., Naka, T., McIndoe, J. S., Besora, M. & Maseras, F. Oxidative additions of aryl halides to palladium proceed through the monoligated complex. ChemCatChem 5, 3604–3609. https://doi.org/10.1002/cctc.201300723 (2013).
Nijamudheen, A. & Datta, A. Mechanism for C-I bond dissociation in Iodoethane, Iodobenzene, and Iodoethene for the C–C cross coupling reactions over gold clusters. J. Phys. Chem. C 117, 21433–21440. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp407927q (2013).
Braga, A. A. C., Morgon, N. H., Ujaque, G. & Maseras, F. Computational characterization of the role of the base in the Suzuki–Miyaura cross-coupling reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 9298–9307. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja050583i (2005).
Amatore, C. & Jutand, A. Anionic Pd(0) and Pd(II) intermediates in palladium-catalyzed heck and cross-coupling reactions. Acc. Chem. Res. 33, 314–321. https://doi.org/10.1021/ar980063a (2000).
Kozuch, S., Amatore, C., Jutand, A. & Shaik, S. What makes for a good catalytic cycle? A theoretical study of the role of an anionic palladium(0) complex in the cross-coupling of an aryl halide with an anionic nucleophile. Organometallics 24, 2319–2330. https://doi.org/10.1021/om050160p (2005).
Kumsapaya, C., Bobuatong, K., Khongpracha, P., Tantirungrotechai, Y. & Limtrakul, J. Mechanistic Investigation on 1,5- to 2,6-Dimethylnaphthalene Isomerization Catalyzed by Acidic β Zeolite: ONIOM Study with an M06-L Functional. J. Phys. Chem. C. 113, 16128–16137. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp904098t (2009)
Bhan, A. & Iglesia, E. A link between reactivity and local structure in acid catalysis on zeolites. Acc. Chem. Res. 41, 559–567. https://doi.org/10.1021/ar700181t (2008).
Corma, A. State of the art and future challenges of zeolites as catalysts. J. Catal. 216, 298–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9517(02)00132-X (2003).
Hsia Chen, C. S. & Bridger, R. F. Shape-selective oligomerization of alkenes to near-linear hydrocarbons by zeolite catalysis. J. Catal. 161, 687–693. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcat.1996.0230 (1996).
Luzgin, M. V. et al. Understanding methane aromatization on a Zn-modified high-silica zeolite. Angew. Chem. 47, 4635–4638. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200800317 (2008).
Smit, B. & Maesen, T. L. M. Towards a molecular understanding of shape selectivity. Nature 451, 671–678. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06552 (2008).
Higgins, J. B. et al. The framework topology of zeolite beta. Zeolites 8, 446–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0144-2449(88)80219-7 (1988).
Paluka, V. et al. Density functional study of the effect of cation exchanged Sn-Beta zeolite for the diels-alder reaction between furan and methyl acrylate. Chem. Phys. Lett. 754, 137743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2020.137743 (2020).
Frisch, M. J. et al. Gaussian 09, Rev. D.01 (Gaussian Inc., Wallingford, 2010).
Acknowledgements
The project was funded by the National Research Council of Thailand (NRCT) and Kasetsart University grant N42A650283 to Bundet Boekfa. The support from the Kasetsart Research and Development Institute (KURDI); the Faculty of Liberal Arts and Science Kasetsart University Kamphaengsaen Campus; National e-Science Infrastructure Consortium; NSTDA Supercomputer Center or ThaiSC Lanta cluster; and the Program Management Unit for Human Resources & Institutional Development, Research, and Innovation, Thailand are also acknowledged. This work was also supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS), Japan (JP20H02718, JP22H05133). Some of the computations were performed in the Research Center for Computational Science, Okazaki, Japan.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
B.B. was responsible for manuscript preparation, performing calculations, and conceptualization. T.M. contributed to formal analysis. M.E. provided editing assistance and formal analysis. J.L. was involved in formal analysis. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Boekfa, B., Maihom, T., Ehara, M. et al. Investigation of the Suzuki–Miyaura cross-coupling reaction on a palladium H-beta zeolite with DFT calculations. Sci Rep 14, 611 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-51116-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-51116-x
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.
