Abstract
Scientific interest related to the role of gut microbiome dysbiosis in the pathogenesis of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has now been established and is constantly growing. Therefore, balancing dysbiosis, through probiotics, would be a potential therapy. In addition to scientific interest, on the other hand, it is important to evaluate the interest in these topics among the population. This study aimed to analyze, temporally and geographically, the public's interest in gut microbiome dysbiosis, NAFLD, and the use of gut probiotics. The most widely used free tool for analyzing online behavior is Google Trends. Using Google Trends data, we have analyzed worldwide volume searches for the terms “gut microbiome”, “dysbiosis”, “NAFLD” and “gut probiotic” for the period from 1, January 2007 to 31 December 2022. Google's relative search volume (RSV) was collected for all terms and analyzed temporally and geographically. The RSV for the term “gut microbiome” has a growth rate of more than 1400% followed, by “gut probiotics” (829%), NAFLD (795%), and “dysbiosis” (267%) from 2007 to 2012. In Australia and New Zealand, we found the highest RSV score for the term “dysbiosis” and “gut probiotics”. Moreover, we found the highest RSV score for the term “NAFLD” in the three countries: South Korea, Singapore, and the Philippines. Google Trends analysis showed that people all over the world are interested in and aware of gut microbiome dysbiosis, NAFLD, and the use of gut probiotics. These data change over time and have a geographical distribution that could reflect the epidemiological worldwide condition of NAFLD and the state of the probiotic market.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The human digestive system is hosted to between 500 and 1000 types of commensal bacteria, the great majority of which are anaerobic1,2. The gut microbiome’s dysbiosis has been associated with several disorders, including chronic inflammation3, neurological and ophthalmic diseases4,5, and chronic liver diseases such as non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), a condition caused by an excessive accumulation of fat in hepatocytes6,7,8. By 2030, the rate of increase in NAFLD incidence is expected to be quadruplicated9,10. The epidemic rise of NAFLD can be attributed in large part to the modern plagues of sedentary living, high-calorie diets, and low levels of physical activity11,12. One of the etiologies of NAFLD has been linked to dysbiosis in the gut microbiome. There is mounting evidence from both preclinical and clinical studies demonstrating that gut dysbiosis is a significant element in the development of this dysfunction and that this disturbance plays a substantial role in NAFLD pathogenesis6,7,8,13,14,15,16,17.
A probiotic is “live bacteria that, when administered in suitable proportions, provide health benefits to the host”18. Studies on the efficacy of probiotics in reversing dysbiosis have shown encouraging results19,20,21. In a number of studies, both preclinical and clinical, probiotics have shown promise in correcting gut dysbiosis and clinical markers of NAFLD illness22,23,24,25,26,27.
Scientific interest related to the role of gut microbiome dysbiosis in the pathogenesis of NAFLD has now been established and is constantly growing6,14,17. Therefore, balancing dysbiosis, through probiotics, would be a potential therapy20,21. In addition to scientific interest, on the other hand, it is important to evaluate the interest in these topics among the population. The most widely used free tool for analyzing online behavior is Google Trends, which can also give real-time data about trends and changes in online interest over time for different terms and themes28,29,30. Electronic data is utilized in this field to monitor online interest in health problems and procedures, predict disease outbreaks, and assess the efficacy of health education efforts31. For example, in a recent study, Mikoła et al. showed how interest in probiotic-related information may be correlated with antibiotic consumption, health expenditures, and the country's level of development32,33.
The purpose of our study is to analyze, temporally and geographically, the public's interest related to gut microbiome dysbiosis, NAFLD, and the use of gut probiotics using Google Trends data, so that physicians and researchers should not only be aware of the hotspots of scientific research but also of the concerns of public interest.
Results
Relative search volume (RSV) trend
Figure 1 depicts the overall global RSV trends for all four searched terms from 2007 to 2022. RSV grew from 45 to about 293. There was a small negative decline between 2008 and 2012. Despite minor fluctuations, the average search strength demonstrated an overall upward tendency. The curve started to rise again in 2013.
Among the four searched terms, “gut microbiome” and “gut probiotics”, changed respectively from an RSV of 6 and 7.4 to an RSV of 86.3 and 61.2. While “dysbiosis” and “NAFLD" have respectively an increase from 19.9 and 11.7 to 53.2 and 92.8 (Fig. 2).
When comparing the RSV value for the year 2022 to the value for the year 2007 for all four words (Fig. 3), the term “gut microbiome” shows a growth of about 1400%, followed by "gut probiotics" (829%), NAFLD (795%), and “dysbiosis” with 267%.
Country relative search volume (RSV) distribution
The geographic distribution graph for each searched term from 2007 to 2022 is shown in Fig. 4, while Table 1 shows the country RSV value for searched terms.
The top ten countries with the highest RSV for the term “gut microbiome” are Australia (RSV = 100), Ireland (RSV = 90), South Korea (RSV = 84), Singapore (RSV = 75), New Zealand (RSV = 71), Hong Kong (RSV = 71), United States (RSV = 68), Canada (RSV = 61), United Kingdom (RSV = 53), China (RSV = 41).
The top ten RSV countries for the term “dysbiosis” are Australia (RSV = 100), New Zealand (RSV = 82), Ireland (RSV = 70), Canada (RSV = 61), United States (RSV = 55), Hong Kong (RSV = 46), United Kingdom (RSV = 45), South Africa (RSV = 37), South Korea (RSV = 36), Singapore (RSV = 35).
For the term “NAFLD”, the top ten are South Korea (RSV = 100), Singapore (RSV = 73), Philippines (RSV = 73), United Kingdom (RSV = 67), Canada (RSV = 56), Australia (RSV = 55), Sri Lanka (RSV = 51), United States (RSV = 50), Bangladesh (RSV = 50), Hong Kong (RSV = 47), Ireland (RSV = 47), New Zealand (RSV = 47), Egypt (RSV = 46).
The following countries are in the top ten ranks for the term “gut probiotics”: Australia (RSV = 100), New Zealand (RSV = 81), Ireland (RSV = 78), Singapore (RSV = 68), Canada (RSV = 60), United States (RSV = 57), United Kingdom (RSV = 52), South Africa (RSV = 44), United Arab Emirates (RSV = 26), Malaysia (RSV = 24).
On the other hand, concerning countries exhibiting the lowest RSV for the term "gut microbiome," the five ranked in ascending order are Russia (RSV = 4), Turkey (RSV = 4), Brazil (RSV = 6), Mexico (RSV = 6) and Poland (RSV = 6).
Instead, the five countries that rank lowest for the term “dysbiosis” are Vietnam (RSV = 3), Brazil (RSV = 4), Poland (RSV = 4), Russia (RSV = 4) and Turkey (RSV = 4).
For the term “NAFLD” are Russia (RSV = 3), Brazil (RSV = 5), Vietnam (RSV = 5), Argentina (RSV = 6), and Turkey (RSV = 6).
Finally, the five countries with the lowest RSV for the term “gut probiotics” are Spain (RSV = 2), Germany (RSV = 3), the Netherlands (RSV = 8), India (RSV = 14), and Nigeria (RSV = 16).
Relative search volume (RSV) of associated queries
The top ten queries related to the searched terms from 2007 to 2022 are listed in Table 2.
Among the top-ten topics related to the term “gut microbiome”, apart from the variation with the article of the search term (the gut microbiome = 100 RSV), we found human gut (RSV = 43), human microbiome (RSV = 41) and human gut microbiome (RSV = 41), gut health (RSV = 35), gut microbiome bacteria (RSV = 27) and gut bacteria (RSV = 27), gut microbiota (RSV = 26), bacteria (RSV = 26) and microbiota (RSV = 26).
Among the most closely connected topics to “dysbiosis” term, we observed: gut (RSV = 100), dysbiosis symptoms (RSV = 25), what is dysbiosis (RSV = 20), microbiota dysbiosis (RSV = 18), microbiota (RSV = 18), dysbiosis diet (RSV = 18), microbiome dysbiosis (RSV = 17), microbiome (RSV = 17), dysbiosis definition (RSV = 17), dysbiosis treatment (RSV = 16).
The top ten results for "NAFLD," are the following: nafld liver (RSV = 100), liver (RSV = 94), nafld nash (RSV = 62), nash (RSV = 62), nafld score (RSV = 50), fatty liver (RSV = 46), nafld disease (RSV = 39), fibrosis (RSV = 28), liver disease (RSV = 27), nafld fibrosis score (RSV = 20), fibrosis score (RSV = 20), nafld diet (RSV = 20).
Top-related topics to "gut probiotics" include probiotics for gut (RSV = 100), gut health probiotics (RSV = 87), gut health (RSV = 86), probiotics for gut health (RSV = 49), best probiotics (RSV = 45), best gut probiotics (RSV = 44), probiotic (RSV = 41), gut bacteria (RSV = 30), leaky gut (RSV = 29), good probiotics (RSV = 21).
Discussion
Nowadays, open data from the internet is being used more and more in health research. Understanding and monitoring public perceptions of disease management and treatment are equally crucial. Google Trends is rapidly becoming the most popular tool for recognizing internet activity34. In our study using Google search traffic data, we observed public interest and knowledge consisting of annual trends, geographic distribution and related topics related to gut microbiome dysbiosis, NAFLD, and the usage of gut probiotics.
RSV annual trend showed an overall increasing trend, although with slight fluctuation, and a decline in RSV from years 2008 to 2012 (Fig. 1). The increase is higher, especially in the last year, with an RSV that varies from a value of 224.9 to a value of 293.3.
Observing the distinct search terms, we could find that those with a considerable increase in RSV values are those related to the terms "gut microbiome", followed by "gut probiotics", “NAFLD” and finally “dysbiosis” (Fig. 2).
Looking at the 2022 to 2007 RSV ratio data (Fig. 3), we found that all search terms follow a significant percentage increase: the term "gut microbiome" has a growth of more than 1 400%, followed by "gut probiotics" (829%), NAFLD (795%), and "dysbiosis" with 267%.
These trends over time reflect the growing research interest in the dysbiosis of the gut microbiome, its role in several diseases including NAFLD and the interest in gut probiotics as a therapy to restore dysbiosis.
In recent years, the demand for probiotic bacteria-containing products has increased. More and more people are adding probiotic bacteria to their diets as functional food supplements because of the positive effects they have on health35,36,37. When it comes to functional food ingredients, probiotics are by far the most popular choice. Studies have shown that probiotic strains can help treat a number of illnesses, including gastrointestinal distress, bacterial vaginosis, and urinary tract infections38,39,40. Protection from dangerous bacteria in the digestive tract, better bowel movement, reduced cholesterol levels, relief from lactose intolerance and inflammation, and so on are just some of the health benefits associated with probiotics41,42.
Another interesting finding in this study was the variation in interest in the searched terms across countries (Fig. 4 and Table 1).
Interestingly, in Australia, and New Zealand, we found the highest RSV score for the term “dysbiosis” and “gut probiotics”. Australia is also in the first rank for the term “gut microbiome”.
From 2021 to 2030, the worldwide probiotics industry is anticipated to increase from 2021’s valuation of about USD 58 billion with a CAGR (compound annual growth rate) of 7.5%43,44. Rising public interest in preventative medicine and the refinement of highly effective probiotic strains are driving the industry. When taken in sufficient quantities, probiotics have positive benefits on the body, including enhanced gastrointestinal wellness and decreased intestinal inflammation45,46. By bolstering the immune system, probiotics play an important role in preventing the onset of illness45,46. Hence, increasing focus on preventative medicine is anticipated to fuel market expansion throughout the forecast period. More than 40.0% of worldwide probiotic market revenue was generated in the Asia Pacific area in 202143,44. Increased consumer awareness is largely attributed to the competitive strategies implemented by multinational companies in the region. Market expansion in the region is anticipated to be driven by a number of factors, including a rising population, rising disposable income, and an increasing standard of life43,44,47. The association between RSV and the topic of probiotics and dysbiosis might be caused by the recommendations of probiotics to restore the gut microbiome12,46.
As far as the “NAFLD” term we found the highest RSV score in the three countries: South Korea, Singapore and the Philippines. An estimated 32.4% of the world's population has NAFLD, and that number has been steadily rising over the past decade48. Among Asian countries, NAFLD is more recent (27%), compared to Europe and North America (24%)49. From 5% in Singapore to 30% in Indonesia, the prevalence of NAFLD in Asia substantially varies50,51. The prevalence of metabolic diseases is on the rise in Korea, from 24.9% in 1998 to 29.0% in 201352. This has become a major public health issue50,51. In Singapore, the number of people living with NAFLD is expected to increase from 1,492,000 in 2019 to 1,799,000 in 203053. In addition, it is concerning that at least one-third of the general population in the Philippines has NAFLD; the prevalence rate is 38%, compared to 25% globally54. It is believed that the rising prevalence of NAFLD in the Asia–Pacific area is due to the widespread adoption of Western food and lifestyle practices and predisposing genetic factors among many different communities55. Rapid industrialization in many Asian nations has led to a shift toward sedentary behaviors and overnutrition, both of which are strongly linked to metabolic problems56. Moreover, despite the fact that obesity and diabetes are well-known risk factors for the disease57,58, a sizable population in the Asian region suffers from NAFLD while having a healthy weight59. It is expected that the number of people diagnosed with NAFLD and NASH throughout Asia will continue to rise, especially in rapidly aging populations, who are more likely to develop chronic lifestyle-related illnesses60.
The top ten related queries in terms of searches from 2007 to 2022 are listed in Table 2. The queries related to the term "gut microbiome", are related to understanding by the public of what the gut microbiome is, what bacteria it consists of, how to diagnose gut dysbiosis, and how to keep it healthy through diet, food, and also probiotics. In addition, some search terms refer to the link between the gut and brain, the so-called gut-brain axis. The gut-liver axis is increasingly being recognized as the underlying cause of NAFLD14,16,17. By dysregulating the gut-liver axis, gut microbiome dysbiosis, which contributes to the development of NAFLD, promotes an increase in intestinal permeability and uncontrolled transport of microbial metabolites into the liver14,16,17. Moreover, NAFLD is facilitated by a dysfunctional gut-liver axis, which affects hepatocyte lipid and glucose metabolism and disturbs the equilibrium of inflammatory mediators14,16,17.
The public queries related to the term "dysbiosis" are related to its definition, the pathogenetic mechanisms that underlie it, possible diagnosis, and treatment.
The queries related to the term "NAFLD" are related to its definition and pathogenetic mechanisms, the correlation with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), the diagnosis of fibrosis, and care through diet. Research has connected dysbiosis in the gut microbiome not only to the development of NAFLD but also to its progression in NASH, which is characterized histologically by hepatocyte damage and various degrees of fibrosis, up until cirrhosis6,7,8,13.
The queries related to the terms “gut probiotics” are related to the public's search for an "effective" probiotic treatment. Among related queries to “gut probiotics” appear also the terms “leaky” or “probiotics for the leaky gut”. The intestinal barrier permits communication between the digestive tract and the liver61,62. Tight connections between intestinal cells are essential for maintaining the integrity of the intestinal barrier63. A leaky gut, defined by decreased intestinal barrier function, is a well-established characteristic of dysbiosis in NAFLD patients64,65. Dysbiosis and associated reduced gut permeability results in an increase in gut-derived toxins in the systemic circulation, constituting metabolic endotoxemia, which contributes to the development of the persistent low-grade inflammation observed in NAFLD65,66.
In conclusion, Google Trends analysis showed that people all over the world are interested in and aware of gut microbiome dysbiosis, NAFLD, and the use of gut probiotics. These data change over time and have a geographical distribution that could reflect the epidemiological worldwide condition of NAFLD and the state of the probiotic market. The collection of such information has the potential to improve the monitoring of numerous diseases in the future. A number of variables limit Google Trends' applicability. Because Google Trends removes queries from the same person over a short time period to reduce counts of continued searching, the service may suffer from sampling bias. Google's search algorithms are constantly being improved, so the same query terms may provide different results. This will make it more challenging to replicate these studies, which rely on reproducible results. Whether or not people learn more about health issues as a result of using Google to research them is debatable. This is because Google Trends only reports how often a term has been searched without providing any information on the quality of the results that may be used to gauge how much useful information can be gleaned from them. Another limitation that could affect our analysis is that the internet is becoming increasingly widespread, embracing an increasingly wide range of populations. Now, you can access the internet with different devices, such as smartphones.
Methods
Data from Google Trends is expressed as relative search volume (RSV). The RSV is presented on a standardized scale from 0 (no search interest) to 100 (greatest search interest). We have searched worldwide RSV for the English terms “gut microbiome, “dysbiosis”, “NAFLD” and “gut probiotics”. The search was limited to the period from 1 January 2007 to 31 December 2022. Data related to the public interest was downloaded in “csv” format from the Google Trends website34 on January 18, 2023. Since the data fluctuates over time, we have processed the data, which is shown as an annual average of the monthly values of RSV from 1 January 2007 to 31 December 2022. Our analysis used the country option to determine the geographical distribution of RSV for each searched term. Google Trends can also identify searches that are connected to a given search term and categorize these searches as “queries.” The top searches option displays popular search phrases that are comparable to the keyword input, during a specific time period. We analyze the 'top' searches for each term “gut microbiome, “dysbiosis”, “NAFLD” and “gut probiotics”.
Data availability
The data sets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available upon request from the corre- sponding author.
References
Thursby, E. & Juge, N. Introduction to the human gut microbiota. Biochem. J. 474, 1823–1836 (2017).
Human Microbiome Project Consortium. Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome. Nature 486, 207–214 (2012).
Wang, J., Chen, W.-D. & Wang, Y.-D. The relationship between gut microbiota and inflammatory diseases: The role of macrophages. Front. Microbiol. 11, 1065 (2020).
Zhang, H. et al. Implications of gut microbiota in neurodegenerative diseases. Front. Immunol. 13, 785644 (2022).
Pezzino, S. et al. Microbiome dysbiosis: A pathological mechanism at the intersection of obesity and glaucoma. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 24, 1166 (2023).
Albhaisi, S. A. M. & Bajaj, J. S. The influence of the microbiome on NAFLD and NASH. Clin. Liver Dis. 17, 15–18 (2021).
Kolodziejczyk, A. A., Zheng, D., Shibolet, O. & Elinav, E. The role of the microbiome in NAFLD and NASH. EMBO Mol. Med. 11, e9302 (2019).
Solé, C. et al. Alterations in gut microbiome in cirrhosis as assessed by quantitative metagenomics: Relationship With acute-on-chronic liver failure and prognosis. Gastroenterology 160, 206-218.e13 (2021).
Estes, C., Razavi, H., Loomba, R., Younossi, Z. & Sanyal, A. J. Modeling the epidemic of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease demonstrates an exponential increase in burden of disease. Hepatology 67, 123–133 (2018).
Murag, S., Ahmed, A. & Kim, D. Recent epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Gut Liver 15, 206–216 (2021).
Vancells Lujan, P., Viñas Esmel, E. & Sacanella Meseguer, E. Overview of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and the role of sugary food consumption and other dietary components in its development. Nutrients 13, 1442 (2021).
Dahiya, D. & Nigam, P. S. The gut microbiota influenced by the intake of probiotics and functional foods with prebiotics can sustain wellness and alleviate certain ailments like gut-inflammation and colon-cancer. Microorganisms 10, 665 (2022).
Byrne, C. D. & Targher, G. NAFLD: A multisystem disease. J. Hepatol. 62, S47-64 (2015).
Pezzino, S. et al. Gut-liver axis and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: A vicious circle of dysfunctions orchestrated by the gut microbiome. Biology (Basel) 11, 1622 (2022).
Lee, N. Y. & Suk, K. T. The role of the gut microbiome in liver cirrhosis treatment. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22, 199 (2020).
Albillos, A., de Gottardi, A. & Rescigno, M. The gut-liver axis in liver disease: Pathophysiological basis for therapy. J. Hepatol. 72, 558–577 (2020).
Song, Q. & Zhang, X. The role of gut-liver axis in gut microbiome dysbiosis associated NAFLD and NAFLD-HCC. Biomedicines 10, 524 (2022).
Hill, C. et al. Expert consensus document. The international scientific association for probiotics and prebiotics consensus statement on the scope and appropriate use of the term probiotic. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 11, 506–514 (2014).
Pandey, K. R., Naik, S. R. & Vakil, B. V. Probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics-a review. J. Food Sci. Technol. 52, 7577–7587 (2015).
Carpi, R. Z. et al. The effects of probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics in non-alcoholic fat liver disease (NAFLD) and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH): A systematic review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23, 8805 (2022).
Kanchanasurakit, S. et al. Effects of synbiotics, probiotics, and prebiotics on liver enzymes of patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Front. Nutr. 9, 880014 (2022).
Xu, R., Wan, Y., Fang, Q., Lu, W. & Cai, W. Supplementation with probiotics modifies gut flora and attenuates liver fat accumulation in rat nonalcoholic fatty liver disease model. J. Clin. Biochem. Nutr. 50, 72–77 (2011).
Esposito, E. et al. Probiotics reduce the inflammatory response induced by a high-fat diet in the liver of young rats. J. Nutr. 139, 905–911 (2009).
Amini-Salehi, E. et al. The impact of gut microbiome-targeted therapy on liver enzymes in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: An umbrella meta-analysis. Nutr. Rev. https://doi.org/10.1093/nutrit/nuad086 (2023).
Mahapatro, A. et al. Anti-inflammatory effects of probiotics and synbiotics on patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: An umbrella study on meta-analyses. Clin. Nutr. ESPEN 57, 475–486 (2023).
Wang, Y., Wang, Y. & Sun, J. The clinical effect of probiotics on patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: A meta-analysis. Bioengineered 13, 14960–14973 (2022).
Zhou, X. et al. Efficacy of probiotics on nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: A meta-analysis. Medicine(Baltimore) 102, e32734 (2023).
Wang, Y., Zhang, H., Zheng, Q., Tang, K. & Sun, Q. Public interest in Raynaud’s phenomenon: A Google Trends analysis. Dermatol. Ther. 33, e14017 (2020).
Dreher, P. C., Tong, C., Ghiraldi, E. & Friedlander, J. I. Use of Google Trends to track online behavior and interest in kidney stone surgery. Urology 121, 74–78 (2018).
Faoury, M., Upile, T. & Patel, N. Using Google Trends to understand information-seeking behaviour about throat cancer. J. Laryngol. Otol. 133, 610–614 (2019).
Eysenbach, G. Infodemiology and infoveillance: Framework for an emerging set of public health informatics methods to analyze search, communication and publication behavior on the Internet. J. Med. Internet Res. 11, e11 (2009).
Mikołaj, K., Igor, Ł & Wojciech, M. Global internet data on the interest in antibiotics and probiotics generated by Google Trends. Antibiotics (Basel) 8, 147 (2019).
Mazzone, C. et al. Scientific and public interest in bariatric surgery for obesity: The Italian scenario. Gastrointest. Disord. 5, 438–454 (2023).
Google Trends. Google Trends https://trends.google.it/trends/?geo=IT.
Grumet, L., Tromp, Y. & Stiegelbauer, V. The development of high-quality multispecies probiotic formulations: From bench to market. Nutrients 12, 2453 (2020).
Gao, J. et al. Probiotics in the dairy industry—Advances and opportunities. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 20, 3937–3982 (2021).
Cunningham, M. et al. Shaping the future of probiotics and prebiotics. Trends Microbiol. 29, 667–685 (2021).
Badgeley, A., Anwar, H., Modi, K., Murphy, P. & Lakshmikuttyamma, A. Effect of probiotics and gut microbiota on anti-cancer drugs: Mechanistic perspectives. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) Rev. Cancer 1875, 188494 (2021).
Bungau, S. G. et al. Targeting probiotics in rheumatoid arthritis. Nutrients 13, 3376 (2021).
Davoodvandi, A. et al. Effects of therapeutic probiotics on modulation of microRNAs. Cell Commun. Signal. 19, 4 (2021).
Iqbal, Z., Ahmed, S., Tabassum, N., Bhattacharya, R. & Bose, D. Role of probiotics in prevention and treatment of enteric infections: A comprehensive review. 3 Biotech 11, 242 (2021).
Wang, G., Chen, Y., Xia, Y., Song, X. & Ai, L. Characteristics of probiotic preparations and their applications. Foods 11, 2472 (2022).
Probiotics Market Size to Hit Around US$133.92 Billion by 2030. https://www.precedenceresearch.com/probiotics-market.
IPA Europe - Market data. Ipa Europe https://www.ipaeurope.org/legal-framework/market-data/.
Wang, X., Zhang, P. & Zhang, X. Probiotics regulate gut microbiota: An effective method to improve immunity. Molecules 26, 6076 (2021).
Mazziotta, C., Tognon, M., Martini, F., Torreggiani, E. & Rotondo, J. C. Probiotics mechanism of action on immune cells and beneficial effects on human health. Cells 12, 184 (2023).
Allied Market Research. Probiotics Market by Ingredient, Function, Application, and End User: Global Opportunity Analysis and Industry Forecast 2021–2030. https://www.researchandmarkets.com/reports/5521540/probiotics-market-by-ingredient-function.
Riazi, K. et al. The prevalence and incidence of NAFLD worldwide: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 7, 851–861 (2022).
Wong, W.-K. & Chan, W.-K. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: A global perspective. Clin. Ther. 43, 473–499 (2021).
Tan, E.X.-X. et al. Non-obese non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in Asia: An international registry study. Metabolism 126, 154911 (2022).
Ashtari, S., Pourhoseingholi, M. A. & Zali, M. R. Non-alcohol fatty liver disease in Asia: Prevention and planning. World J. Hepatol. 7, 1788–1796 (2015).
Lim, S. et al. Increasing prevalence of metabolic syndrome in Korea: The Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey for 1998–2007. Diabetes Care 34, 1323–1328 (2011).
Estes, C. et al. Modelling NAFLD disease burden in four Asian regions—2019–2030. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 51, 801–811 (2020).
Lusong, M. A. A. D., Labio, E., Daez, L. & Gloria, V. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in the Philippines: Comparable with other nations?. World J. Gastroenterol. 14, 913–917 (2008).
Wong, V.W.-S. et al. Asia–Pacific working party on non-alcoholic fatty liver disease guidelines 2017—Part 1: Definition, risk factors and assessment. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 33, 70–85 (2018).
Bishwajit, G. Nutrition transition in South Asia: The emergence of non-communicable chronic diseases. F1000Research 4, 8 (2015).
Chan, W.-K. et al. Clinical features and treatment of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease across the Asia Pacific region—The GO ASIA initiative. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 47, 816–825 (2018).
KASL clinical practice guidelines. Management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Clin. Mol. Hepatol. 19, 325–348 (2013).
Fan, J.-G., Kim, S.-U. & Wong, V.W.-S. New trends on obesity and NAFLD in Asia. J. Hepatol. 67, 862–873 (2017).
Khan, A. et al. Risk prevention and health promotion for non-alcoholic fatty liver diseases (NAFLD). Livers 2, 264–282 (2022).
Plaza-Díaz, J. et al. The gut barrier, intestinal microbiota, and liver disease: molecular mechanisms and strategies to manage. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21, 8351 (2020).
Stärkel, P., Schnabl, B. Bidirectional communication between liver and gut during alcoholic liver disease. In Seminars in Liver Disease, vol. 36, pp. 331–339 (2016).
Gieryńska, M., Szulc-Dąbrowska, L., Struzik, J., Mielcarska, M. B. & Gregorczyk-Zboroch, K. P. Integrity of the intestinal barrier: The involvement of epithelial cells and microbiota—A mutual relationship. Animals (Basel) 12, 145 (2022).
Kessoku, T. et al. The role of leaky gut in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: A novel therapeutic target. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22, 8161 (2021).
Quesada-Vázquez, S. et al. Microbiota dysbiosis and gut barrier dysfunction associated with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease are modulated by a specific metabolic cofactors’ combination. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23, 13675 (2022).
Saltzman, E. T., Palacios, T., Thomsen, M. & Vitetta, L. Intestinal microbiome shifts, dysbiosis, inflammation, and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Front. Microbiol. 9, 61 (2018).
Acknowledgements
This paper was written using data obtained on January 18, 2023, from Google Trends online platforms available at https://trends.google.it/trends.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
S.P. and S.L. contributed to the conception and design of the study. S.P. and S.L. prepared the draft of the manuscript. S.P. was a major contributor to writing the manuscript. M.S., C.M., G.L., M.A., G.L.G. reviewed and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Pezzino, S., Sofia, M., Mazzone, C. et al. Exploring public interest in gut microbiome dysbiosis, NAFLD, and probiotics using Google Trends. Sci Rep 14, 799 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-50190-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-50190-5
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.