Abstract
Calcium carbonate [CaCO3] is a key raw material used in the clarification of sugarcane juice for syrup production. The CaCO3 sludge produced during the clarification process is waste that needs to be stored, creating a geoenvironmental problem. On the other hand, it has been found that cement-stabilized subgrade is a suitable alternative for improving the quality of a subgrade course. This study aimed to investigate the influence of calcium carbonate sludge on the quality of the subgrade. The subgrade was composed of a mixture of 10% to 30% CaCO3 sludge, 1% to 3% of original Portland cement (OPC), and 67% to 100% of unqualified crushed rocks by weight. The modified Proctor method was used to compact soil–cement admixture samples, which were then tested for mechanical properties and electrical resistivity. The Wenner electrode array was used to measure electrical resistivity and compare it to the unconfined compressive strength of 16 different types of soil–cement mixtures after 7 days. The results of experiments show that the basic properties of CaCO3 sludge, when mixed with OPC and packed down, can make the best soil–cement mixture. As a result of this study, electrical resistivity was found to be in good correlation with unconfined compressive strength, thus opening up a time-saving and cost-effective way to check the quality of a soil–cement mixture.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Cement-stabilized subgrade (CSS) is a compacted, engineered mixture of pulverized in-situ soil, water, and moderate proportions of cement that result in a semi-bound to bound material. The benefits of CSS include improved shear and compressive strength, as well as reduced soil shrinkage and swelling tendencies. The volume of cement used and the type of soil are factors that determine the level of improvement1.
Lime and original Portland cement (OPC) can be used for ground improvement and high-grade road construction2,3,4,5,6,7. The OPC has been used to improve the quality of the soil–cement mixture8,9,10,11,12,13. Cement treatment can help to maintain project timelines and minimize the impacts of gap-graded soil on pavement design1.
Calcium carbonate [CaCO3] is a key raw material used in the clarification of sugarcane juice for syrup production14, as shown in Fig. 1. The study was conducted in the Suphan-Buri province of Thailand, as indicated in Fig. 2 (left-hand side inset), which also shows an area where CaCO3 sludge is stored after the clarification process (Fig. 2, right-hand side inset). The clarification process is necessary to reduce particles in sugarcane juice before heating to produce syrup15. Although CaCO3 is insoluble in water16, it can react with water and carbon dioxide [CO2] to form calcium bicarbonate [Ca(HCO3)2].
The effect of nano-CaCO3 on the ultimate compressive strength of the soil in the XRD patterns indicated an increase in the recrystallization of the particles17. The marine environment had a great influence on the strength and durability of cement-stabilized soil, and compound nano-CaCO3 addition could effectively improve the compressive strength of cement-stabilized soil at early and late ages due to the nucleation and nano-filling function18. CaCO3 has also been widely mixed with Portland cement in research to demonstrate its impact on concrete quality19,20,21,22.
Giao et al.23 conducted a study on the geotechnical properties of clay deposits in Busan, South Korea, using electrical resistivity measurements. The study involved over 50 clay samples collected from various locations worldwide and was able to establish a correlation between electrical resistivity and other geotechnical parameters such as salinity, water content, unit weight, and sampling depth. Similar studies were performed by Liu et al.24 Bery and Saad25 Zhang et al.26. Some studies have found a relationship between electrical resistivity and hydraulic conductivity for certain soil types, e.g., Abu-Hassanein et al.27, Latt and Giao28.
Liu et al.29 investigated the relationship between electrical resistivity and curing time of soil–cement admixtures, as well as the influence of OPC volume on unconfined compression strength (UCS). They found that the UCS is proportional to the increased OPC volumes. However, it is important to note that the finite size of the samples tested in the experiment can affect the electrical resistivity measurements, which have to be corrected for geometric effects depending on the measuring setup30,31.
The goal of this study is to find out if adding CaCO3 sludge to a mix of OPC and unqualified crushed rocks will improve the quality of the subgrade course in terms of unconfined compressive strength (UCS). This study supports the waste-to-wealth approach by reusing CaCO3 sludge, which causes environmental problems such as particulate matter with a diameter of less than 2.5 microns and wastewater. In addition, using the cement treatment with CaCO3 sludge can improve soil cement properties and reduce compaction energy. The CaCO3 sludge improves the optimum moisture content (OMC) under different humidity conditions.
The influence of CaCO3 sludge in the admixture will be assessed through resistivity measurements. The estimation guidelines for OPC and CaCO3 sludge dosage will be used for subgrade courses to obtain mix proportions that meet engineering requirements. Also, we want to find a link between electrical resistivity and UCS so that electrical resistivity can be used as a quick way to measure UCS and the overall quality of the subgrade mixed with CaCO3 sludge.
Experimental program
Materials
Materials used in the experiment include OPC, CaCO3 sludge, and unqualified crushed rocks with properties shown in Table 1.
Table 2 shows the results of the semi-qualitative analysis of OPC and CaCO3 sludge's chemical composition. The main oxide found in both materials is CaO, which amounts to 63.82% and 97.24% in OPC and CaCO3 sludge, respectively. Other components found in OPC include MgO, Al2O3, SiO2, P2O5, SO3, K2O, MnO, and Fe2O3, and loss on ignition (LOI) was followed by ASTM C114-11b32, while CaCO3 sludge also contains small amounts of MgO, Al2O3, SiO2, P2O5, SO3, K2O, Fe2O3, SrO, and LOI. These results can be useful for understanding the properties of these materials and their potential applications. CaO is an important factor in the main compound in OPC when calculated by Bogue's equation 33.
Figure 3 presents the results of the scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis of the particles of OPC and CaCO3 sludge. Figure 3a shows that the particles of OPC are deformed and have an amorphous structure. This is due to the rapid cooling and grinding processes, which can result in the formation of amorphous particles. The amorphous particles have an irregular structure and lack a well-defined crystalline structure.
Figure 3b shows the particles of the CaCO3 sludge, which are coagulated, smooth, and angular in shape. The coagulation of particles is due to the agglomeration of small particles into larger ones. The smooth and angular shape of the particles indicates that they are well-formed and have not undergone any significant alteration in shape or size during processing. Overall, the SEM analysis provides valuable information about the characteristics of the particles of the OPC and CaCO3 sludge, including their morphology, texture, and structure.
Mix design proportion
Table 3 shows the mix design proportions, consisting of a CaCO3 sludge ratio of 10% to 30%, an OPC of 1% to 3%, and unqualified crushed rocks in a ratio of 67% to 100% by weight. The water content of soil–cement admixtures is determined using the water content at the optimum moisture content, as tested according to ASTM D1557.
Experimental program
Soil–cement casting and testing
The optimum moisture content (OMC) of soil–cement admixtures is determined by the modified Proctor compaction test followed by ASTM D1557, as mentioned above. UCS is tested using the following procedure: (i) place the sample stick in the center of the lower press pedal, moving the upper keypad to touch the sample properly; (ii) adjust the gauge for measuring contraction and force to be located at the center; and (iii) press the sample with a vertical rate of movement and strain rate in the range of 0.5% to 2% per minute.
Electrical resistivity testing
Figure 4 shows the Wenner electrode array, which is commonly used in field resistivity surveys. The array consists of four equally spaced electrodes, including a pair of current electrodes (A and B) through which electric current is injected into the ground and a pair of potential electrodes (M and N) across which the difference in electric potential is measured.
The apparent electrical resistivity (ρa) in Ω m can be determined based on the current intensity (I) in mA and the potential difference between M and N (ΔV) in mV readings using the following formula:
Here, k is called the geometric factor and is defined by Eq. (2) below. The value of k in the formula for calculating the apparent electrical resistivity depends on the geometry of the electrode array used. For the Wenner array, the geometric factor is defined as k = 2πa, where a is the distance between adjacent electrodes.
When measuring electrical resistivity on laboratory core samples, the finite size of the sample can affect the accuracy of the measurements, and it is necessary to correct for this geometric effect. Morris et al.30 proposed a correction factor (Kc) to adjust the measured (or apparent) resistivity (ρa) of a cylindrical concrete sample of limited size. Other studies, such as Giao et al.23 and James and Pandian2, have also explored this issue in more detail.
The setup for measuring the electrical resistivity of soil–cement admixtures used in this study is based on the design proposed by Giao et al.23. It uses four steel needle electrodes with a diameter of 6 mm and a length of 30 mm, which are inserted into the sample to a depth of 10 mm. The electrodes are spaced 0.05 m apart from each other and arranged in a Wenner array configuration (as shown in Fig. 5). The soil–cement admixture is placed in a PVC mold with a diameter of 0.15 m and a length of 0.30 m.
The silicone sealant is used to fill the gap formed between the probe and PVC. For the upper and lower ends of the soil, the cement sample is closed with a plastic sheet to prevent moisture from evaporating into the outside atmosphere. To control moisture during the hydration reaction, the sample is cured using a chemical curing process according to ASTM C 309 standards. The electrical resistivity measurements are taken using this setup on the cured soil–cement admixture samples.
Results and discussions
Maximum dry density, MDD
The impact of using CaCO3 sludge as a replacement for unqualified crushed rocks in ratios of 10%, 20%, and 30%, respectively, compared to CONTROL (see Table 3), can be seen in Fig. 6. According to measurements made using modified Proctor tests, the figure demonstrates that the higher the percentage of CaCO3 sludge, the lower the dry density and the higher the water content.
For SC1-0, SC2-0, and SC3-0, which used Portland cement to replace unqualified crushed rocks of 1%–3%, the maximum dry density was between 2,290 and 2,315 gm/cc and the water content was 5.2%–5.6%. According to the findings, MDD increases with cement content. There were slight increases in OMC but minor decreases in MDD.
Table 4 compares the MDD and OMC values from this study to those from previous studies. Chummuneerat et al.34 found that crushed rock containing 2% OPC had OMC and MDD values of 6.3% and 2.327 gm/cc, respectively. These findings are consistent with those of Djellali et al.35 and Okonkwo et al.36. The higher Portland cement content is inversely proportional to the water content because Portland cement sucks water to perform hydration reactions in the bonding process. The specific gravity of cement particles is greater than that of unqualified crushed rocks. The addition of cement to a particular percentage of unqualified crushed rocks raises the density of the entire mass35.
Specifically, for SC0-10, SC0-20, and SC0-30, the maximum dry density is 3%, 7%, and 11% lower than the CONTROL, respectively. The CaCO3 sludge provides a wider range of optimum moisture content (OMC) as the CaCO3 sludge increases. For example, SC0-20 has an OMC width range of 1%, ranging from 6.8% to 7.8%, while SC0-30 has an OMC width range of 1.2%, ranging from 7.3% to 8.5%.
It shows that CaCO3 sludge is a material that improves quality and stability under OMC for subgrade. The reason for this phenomenon can be attributed to the tiny particle size and high water-absorbing characteristics of CaCO3 sludge, as shown in Fig. 5a. The filler effect of fine CaCO3 particles ensures the optimum moisture content (OMC) of soil compaction, which increases cohesiveness and uniformity.
Unconfined compressive strength, UCS
The results of an unconfined compressive strength (UCS) trial of soil–cement samples in Table 3 showed that UCS increases with increasing cement content and decreasing CaCO3 sludge content, as shown in Fig. 7. The cement content promotes hydration reactions in different ratios, and the soil–cement mixture forms a solid mass with a higher unconfined compressive strength37.
Calcium silicate hydrate, an essential component of the hardened paste that provides cement-based structures with strength, can be created by the reaction of calcium carbonate sludge with Portland cement. The reaction is described as follows:
The minimum UCS requirements for cement-stabilized subgrade (CSS) trials were above 0.70 MPa (100 psi) at a 7-day curing time1. The trials found that the cement content was 0.80, 1.48, and 2.60 percent, and the CaCO3 sludge ratios were 10, 20, and 30 percent by weight, respectively. The main target of this study is not to get a higher UCS but to achieve the required standard UCS for pavement with less OPC. As shown in Fig. 7, for the required standard USC value of 0.7 MPa, we can have different mixtures, i.e.: (i) SC1-10: with 10% CaCO3 sludge and 0.8% of OPC; (ii) SC1-20: with 20% CaCO3 sludge and 1.48% of OPC; and (iii) SC1-30: with 30% CaCO3 sludge and 2.6% of OPC, among which the mixture of SC1-10 has a clear advantage in having less OPC but still meets the requirement of UCS.
The cement-treated base (CTB) is calculated for UCS of not less than 2.10 MPa or 300 psi1. The OPC should be used at a ratio of 2.68 percent versus a CaCO3 sludge of 10 percent (Fig. 7). According to the results of the experiment, the maximum UCS of CaCO3 sludge at an OPC 3% mixture ranging from 20 to 30% was 1.45 and 0.80 MPa, respectively. In order to achieve the ultimate compressive strength (UCS) of 2.10 MPa or 300 psi required by the CTB, the experimental findings propose utilizing a mixture consisting of 2.68 percent ordinary Portland cement (OPC) and a maximum of 10 percent calcium carbonate (CaCO3) in the sludge.
Calcium silicate hydrate, a gel-like substance that fills the pores and gaps in the cement paste, is created when the calcium ions in calcium carbonate sludge mix with the silicate ions in Portland cement38. When calcium carbonate sludge is added to cement-stabilized subgrade quality, the mixture's workability and optimal moisture content (OMC) can be improved under high humidity conditions, opening up the possibility of low-cost construction. Therefore, it is important to carefully consider the amount of CaCO3 sludge used in CTB mixtures and ensure that the mixture meets the required UCS specifications.
Figure 8 shows the relationship between shear stress and unconfined compressive strength. The study divided the sample into three groups: 10%, 20%, and 30% CaCO3 sludge, with 1%–3% Portland cement in each group. It has been noted that the shear strength envelopes exhibit linear behavior with respect to net normal stress.
Cement content is the most influential factor in determining maximum shear stress and UCS. The SC(1–3)-10 requires CaCO3 sludge to have a fixed rate of 10% and increases OPC from 1 to 3%, revealing that linear equations have a steeper slope than the SC(1–3)-20 and SC(1–3)-30, which are composed of CaCO3 sludge in the proportions of 20%–30%. The results indicate that increasing OPC doses at a 10% CaCO3 sludge concentration will have a higher effect on shear stress than UCS. On the other hand, as the quantity of CaCO3 sludge increases, the linear curve will have a shallower slope, indicating that it will have a greater effect on UCS than shear stress. However, previous studies have indicated that Portland cement improves soil–cement quality, as demonstrated by Horpibulsuk et al.8, Nguyen et al.39.
Shear modulus of soil (GM) can be calculated based on the elastic modulus (Es) and Poisson's ratio (υ) as shown in Eq. (4):
The relationship between shear modulus and unconfined compressive strength is plotted in Fig. 9, which is in agreement with some previous studies that found GM increases with UCS (qu) and cement content40,41. Shear modulus ranges from 39.6 to 116.8 MPa for SC1-30 and SC3-10, while unconfined compressive strength ranges from 0.17 MPa at the lowest to 2.38 MPa. The correlation between the shear modulus and unconfined compressive strength is very good with R1 equal to 0.97 as shown in Fig. 9.
Relationship between the electrical resistivity and UCS
Measurement of resistivity soil–cement samples at a 7-day curing time with a Wenner electrode array and using Morris's correction (Kc)30 compared with UCS as shown in Fig. 10. The results of the experiment showed that the relationship between electrical resistivity (ρ) and unconfined compressive strength (qu) is proportional to unconfined compressive strength. The presence of OPC in ingredients is a crucial element in electrical resistance42,43.
The results demonstrated that the electrical resistivity of cement-treated soils increases as cement content rises44. While the increased amount of CaCO3 sludge content is inversely proportional to electrical resistivity, A correlation between these two parameters was obtained, as shown in Eq. (5):
The correlation coefficient R2 = 0.92 demonstrates a strong correlation between soil–cement resistivity and the unconfined compressive strength of the material. When compared to Liu et al.24 and Zhang et al.44, the results of this experiment indicated a similar tendency.
As was already indicated, OPC is the main reason for the greater mechanical and electrical resistivity of soil–cement. The relationship between elastic modulus and electrical resistivity is seen in Fig. 11. When compared to UCS, elastic modulus characteristics are determined by cement usage, soil type, and chemical additives45. These two parameters were found to be correlated, as given in Eq. (6):
This indicates that soil–cement resistivity can be effectively utilized to monitor the strength (qu) and elastic modulus (Es) of the material. The advantages of measuring electrical resistivity in soil and cement include the following: (i) It is a non-destructive test that allows real-time monitoring of the material; (ii) Resistivity measurement is reliable and quick, resulting in cost savings.
Conclusions
The use of CaCO3 sludge in cement-stabilized subgrade quality was investigated through aggregate testing and electrical resistivity measurements, and the following conclusions can be drawn:
-
1)
The addition of CaCO3 sludge results in a decrease in dry density, while the water content tends to increase. Therefore, the water content influences dry density to decrease when the CaCO3 sludge content exceeds 20%.
-
2)
Unconfined compressive strength increases proportionally with the amount of cement content and decreases inversely with the CaCO3 sludge content.
-
3)
This study suggests a mix of CaCO3 sludge, OPC, and unqualified crushed rocks to improve the quality of the subgrade course and meet the needs of the project.
-
4)
The shear moduls of soil (GM) was found in a good relrionship with the unconfined compressive strength as shown in Fig. 9 with a correlation coefficient R2 = 0.9248.
-
5)
To predict unconfined compressive strength by measuring electrical resistivity, simple equations can describe the relationship between electrical resistivity and mechanical properties of soil–cement admixtures.
-
6)
The electrical resistivity measurement method is a quick and easy way to find out about soil–cement and compare it to unconfined compressive strength based on the linear relationship shown in Eq. (5).
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Gross, J., & Adaska, W. Guide to cement-stabilized subgrade soils. Portland Cement Association, 1–4 (2020).
James, J. I. J. O. & Pandian, P. A study on the early UCC strength of stabilized soil admixed with industrial waste materials. Int. J. Earth Sci. Eng. 7(3), 1055–1063 (2014).
Ojuri, O. O., Adavi, A. A. & Oluwatuyi, O. E. Geotechnical and environmental evaluation of lime–cement stabilized soil–mine tailing mixtures for highway construction. Transp. Geotech. 10, 1–12 (2017).
Phanikumar, B. R. & Raju, E. R. Compaction and strength characteristics of an expansive clay stabilised with lime sludge and cement. Soils Found. 60(1), 129–138 (2020).
Hov, S. et al. Lime-cement stabilisation of Trondheim clays and its impact on carbon dioxide emissions. Soils Found 62(3), 101162 (2022).
Reis, J. B. et al. Experimental investigation of binder based on rice husk ash and eggshell lime on soil stabilization under acidic attack. Sci. Rep. 12(1), 7542 (2022).
Wu, Y. et al. Experimental study of the working property and strength behavior of waste marine clay with high water content modified with quicklime, ground calcium carbonate, and a WXS-II soil stabilizer. Constr. Build. Mater. 360, 129622 (2022).
Horpibulsuk, S., Rachan, R., Chinkulkijniwat, A., Raksachon, Y. & Suddeepong, A. Analysis of strength development in cement-stabilized silty clay from microstructural considerations. Constr. Build. Mater. 24(10), 2011–2021 (2010).
Al-Amoudi, O. S. B., Al-Homidy, A. A., Maslehuddin, M. & Saleh, T. A. Method and mechanisms of soil stabilization using electric arc furnace dust. Sci. Rep. 7(1), 1–10 (2017).
Jan, O. Q. & Mir, B. A. Strength behaviour of cement stabilised dredged soil. Int. J. Geosynth. Ground Eng. 4, 1–14 (2018).
Sayyah, M. A., Abrishami, S., Dastpak, P. & Dias, D. Behavior of volcanic ash–soil mixtures under one-dimensional compression testing. Sci. Rep. 12(1), 14524 (2022).
Ng, Y. C. et al. An approach for characterising electrical conductivity of cement-admixed clays. Soils Found. 62(2), 101127 (2022).
Zuo, J. et al. Quality assessment and quality control of deep soil mixing columns based on a cement-content controlled method. Sci. Rep. 13(1), 4813 (2023).
Van der Poel, P. W. Sugar technology. Beet and cane sugar manufacture/PW van der Poel, H. Schiweck, T. Schwartz. Berlin: Verlag Dr. Albert Vartens KG (1998).
Laksameethanasana, P., Somla, N., Janprem, S. & Phochuen, N. Clarification of sugarcane juice for syrup production. Proc. Eng. 32, 141–147 (2012).
Patnaik, P. Handbook of Inorganic Chemicals Vol. 529, 769–771 (McGraw-Hill, 2003).
Mohammadi, M., Rajabi, A. M. & Khodaparast, M. Experimental and numerical evaluation of the effect of nano calcium carbonate on geotechnical properties of clayey sand soil. KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 26(1), 35–46 (2022).
Meng, T., Qiang, Y., Hu, A., Xu, C. & Lin, L. Effect of compound nano-CaCO3 addition on strength development and microstructure of cement-stabilized soil in the marine environment. Constr. Build. Mater. 151, 775–781 (2017).
Matschei, T., Lothenbach, B. & Glasser, F. P. The role of calcium carbonate in cement hydration. Cem. Concr. Res. 37(4), 551–558 (2007).
Camiletti, J., Soliman, A. M. & Nehdi, M. L. Effects of nano-and micro-limestone addition on early-age properties of ultra-high-performance concrete. Mater. Struct. 46, 881–898 (2013).
Sato, T. & Diallo, F. Seeding effect of nano-CaCO3 on the hydration of tricalcium silicate. Transp. Res. Record 2141(1), 61–67 (2010).
Sato, T. & Beaudoin, J. J. Effect of nano-CaCO3 on hydration of cement containing supplementary cementitious materials. Adv. Cement Res. 23(1), 33–43 (2011).
Giao, P. H., Chung, S. G., Kim, D. Y. & Tanaka, H. Electric imaging and laboratory resistivity testing for geotechnical investigation of Pusan clay deposits. J. Appl. Geophys. 52(4), 157–175 (2003).
Liu, S. Y., Du, Y. J., Han, L. H. & Gu, M. F. Experimental study on the electrical resistivity of soil–cement admixtures. Environ. Geol. 54, 1227–1233 (2008).
Bery, A. A. & Saad, R. Tropical clayey sand soil’s behaviour analysis and its empirical correlations via geophysics electrical resistivity method and engineering soil characterizations. Int. J. Geosci. 3(1), 111–116 (2012).
Zhang, D. W., Chen, L. & Liu, S. Y. Key parameters controlling electrical resistivity and strength of cement treated soils. J. Central South Univ. 19(10), 2991–2998 (2012).
Abu-Hassanein, Z. S., Benson, C. H. & Blotz, L. R. Electrical resistivity of compacted clays. J. Geotech. Eng. 122(5), 397–406 (1996).
Latt, K. M. & Giao, P. H. Prediction of permeability of cement-admixed soft clay using resistivity and time-domain IP measurements. J. Appl. Geophys. 137, 92–103 (2017).
Liu, S. Y., Du, Y. J., Han, L. H. & Gu, M. F. Experimental study on the electrical resistivity of soil–cement admixtures. Environ. Geol. 54, 1227–1233 (2008).
Morris, W., Moreno, E. I. & Sagüés, A. A. Practical evaluation of resistivity of concrete in test cylinders using a Wenner array probe. Cement Concr. Res. 26(12), 1779–1787 (1996).
Wiwattanachang, N. & Giao, P. H. Monitoring crack development in fiber concrete beam by using electrical resistivity imaging. J. Appl. Geophys. 75(2), 294–304 (2011).
ASTM C114–11b, “Standard Test Method for Chemical Analysis of Hydraulic Cement,” Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 4.01, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
Hanein, T., Glasser, F. P. & Bannerman, M. N. Thermodynamic data for cement clinkering. Cement Concr. Res. 132, 106043 (2020).
Chummuneerat, S., Jitsangiam, P. & Nikraz, H. Performances of hydrated cement treated crushed rock base for Western Australian roads. J. Traffic Transp. Eng. 1(6), 432–438 (2014).
Djellali, A., Laouar, M. S., Saghafi, B. & Houam, A. Evaluation of cement-stabilized mine tailings as pavement foundation materials. Geotech. Geol. Eng. 37, 2811–2822 (2019).
Okonkwo, V. O., Omaliko, I. K. & Ezema, N. M. Stabilization of lateritic soil with portland cement and sand for road pavement. Open Access Library J. 9(6), 1–15 (2022).
Pham, T. A., Koseki, J. & Dias, D. Optimum material ratio for improving the performance of cement-mixed soils. Transp. Geotech. 28, 100544 (2011).
Cong, M., Longzhu, C. & Bing, C. Analysis of strength development in soft clay stabilized with cement-based stabilizer. Constr. Build. Mater. 71, 354–362 (2014).
Nguyen, T. T., Nguyen, M. D., Nguyen, T. & Phan, T. C. Interface shear strength behavior of cement-treated soil under consolidated drained conditions. Buildings 13(7), 1626 (2023).
Heidarizadeh, Y., Lajevardi, S. H. & Sharifipour, M. Correlation between small-strain shear stiffness and compressive strength of clayey soils stabilized with cement and nano-SiO 2. Int. J. Geosynth. Ground Eng. 7, 1–12 (2021).
Soból, E. et al. Laboratory studies of small strain stiffness and modulus degradation of Warsaw mineral cohesive soils. Minerals 10(12), 1127 (2020).
de Melo, L. B. B. et al. Effect of compaction on the relationship between electrical resistivity and soil water content in Oxisol. Soil Tillage Res. 208, 104876 (2021).
Abd Malik, A. K., Madun, A., Talib, M. A., Wahab, N. & Dan, M. M. Interpretation of soil grain size effect on electrical resistivity method. Phys. Chem. Earth Parts A/B/C 129, 103324 (2023).
Zhang, D. W., Chen, L. & Liu, S. Y. Key parameters controlling electrical resistivity and strength of cement treated soils. J. Central South Univ. 19(10), 2991–2998 (2012).
Fan, J., Wang, D. & Qian, D. Soil-cement mixture properties and design considerations for reinforced excavation. J. Rock Mech. Geotech. Eng. 10(4), 791–797 (2018).
Acknowledgements
This work has received funding from the National Research Council of Thailand (NRCT) 2019, Grant agreement No. RDG62T0084.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
N.W.: Conceptualization, Methodology, Data curation, Writing- original draft, Validation. C.V.: Investigation. P.H.G.: Methodology, Writing—review & editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Wiwattanachang, N., Vichalai, C. & Giao, P.H. Influence of calcium carbonate sludge on cement-stabilized subgrade quality as investigated by means of electrical resistivity measurements. Sci Rep 13, 19392 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-46282-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-46282-x
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.