Abstract
The phylum Phoronida comprises filter-feeding invertebrates that live in a protective tube sometimes reinforced with particulate material from the surrounding environments. Animals with these characteristics make promising candidate hosts for symbiotic bacteria, given the constant interactions with various bacterial colonizers, yet phoronids are one of the very few animal phyla with no available microbiome data whatsoever. Here, by sequencing the V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene, we compare bacterial microbiomes in whole phoronids, including both tube and living tissues, with those associated exclusively to the isolated tube and/or the naked animal inside. We also compare these communities with those from the surrounding water. Phoronid microbiomes from specimens belonging to the same colony but collected a month apart were significantly different, and bacterial taxa previously reported in association with invertebrates and sediment were found to drive this difference. The microbiomes associated with the tubes are very similar in composition to those isolated from whole animals. However, just over half of bacteria found in whole specimens are also found both in tubes and naked specimens. In conclusion, phoronids harbour bacterial microbiomes that differ from those in the surrounding water, but the composition of those microbiomes is not stable and appears to change in the same colony over a relatively short time frame. Considering individual spatial/anatomical compartments, the phoronid tube contributes most to the whole-animal microbiome.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Phoronids, or horseshoe worms (phylum Phoronida), are marine invertebrates whose life cycle usually involves a pelagic larva and a benthic, sessile adult that bores into soft sediment or hard substrates like rocks or mollusc shells1. Phoronids filter-feed using an arch of tentacles, the lophophore, and protect their vermiform trunk with a chitinous tube excreted by epidermal glands, sometimes enriched with particulate material from its surroundings1. The phylum contains very few described species, but it occupies a still debated phylogenetic position within Lophotrochozoa—a key group for understanding the evolution of protostome and deuterostome metazoans2.
Recent efforts have dramatically expanded the number of invertebrate phyla targeted for microbiome analysis and highlighted the importance of environmental factors in shaping animal-associated bacterial community composition3,4. In general, the effects of host taxonomy appear to be minimal in these phyla, and relatively few bacterial sequence variants seem to be truly host-specific3,5. Environmental conditions like water temperature6 and seasonality7 are also known to affect the microbiome of larger filter-feeders like bivalves8, which show variation between tissues of the same individuals9,10. Bacteria isolated from the environment can also have direct implications on planktonic larvae, including those of phoronids, serving as “ecological ushers” by inducing substrate-specific metamorphosis11. Within phoronids themselves, there are isolated reports of bacteria inside the lophophore12, in-between microvilli of the body wall13, associated with specific layers of the tube14, and within specialised nerve cells in larvae15. However, the identities and functions of these bacteria remain unknown. Standing out against a fast-growing database of marine invertebrate microbiomes, Phoronida remains one of the very few animal phyla whose complete microbiome has never been sequenced.
Here, we report the bacterial microbiome of phoronids collected from two consecutive months at the same location in British Columbia, Canada (Fig. 1a,b). Bacterial 16S rRNA gene libraries were generated from whole individuals, naked animals (i.e., without the external chitinous tube), and isolated tubes, to determine the importance of spatial/anatomical compartmentalisation in overall microbiome composition, within the context of community changes over time.
Phoronid identification and lack of a eukaryotic microbiome
The phoronid 18S rRNA gene sequence obtained shows the highest sequence identities with NCBI-deposited references annotated as Phoronis vancouverensis (99.65–99.88%) and Phoronis ijimai (99.53%). Whether these species are synonymous is unclear, and the historic reliance on morphological features to determine taxonomic identity, together with a lack of molecular information from this group, has generally hindered this debate. It is noted, however, that the sequence divergence between the P. vancouverensis and P. ijimai COI gene is much lower than the range typically discriminating other phoronid species16.
The amplification of non-metazoan 18S rRNA gene fragments (following methods detailed in17) proved unsuccessful. Moreover, visual inspection through dissected tissues of at least five specimens provided no evidence of symbiotic protists. We therefore conclude that the animals in the investigated colony do not possess a significant and detectable eukaryotic microbiome. However, small marine invertebrates which often harbour symbiotic protists tend to exhibit low richness of eukaryotic Amplicon Sequence Variants (ASVs)17.
Sampling date and anatomical compartment influence phoronid microbiome composition
Only 37.6% of bacterial variants were shared between individuals collected at different dates, and samples clustered accordingly, forming two distinct groups in an ordination using Aitchison distance (Fig. 2a; PERMANOVA: p value = < 0.01; BETADISPER: p value = 0.078). Considering ASVs with the largest coefficients contributing to the statistical difference, Aurantivirga, “Candidatus Scalindua” and Blastopirellula ASVs are enriched in July samples, whereas Neptunomonas, Rubritalea and a Bacteriovoracaceae contribute most to August samples (Fig. 2b). Despite being common environmental taxa, all but three of the most influential ASVs determining temporal separation (Aurantivirga, Rubritalea and an unknown Flavobacteriaceae) were found in the phoronids themselves and not the surrounding water, as one might expect. Several of these taxa have been noted to colonise biotic surfaces18 or have been isolated from marine sediment19 and invertebrates20. Aurantivirga abundance correlates with cyclical proliferation of diatoms in phytoplankton blooms21 and might hence reflect environmental changes. Indeed, phoronids are known to feed on bloom-forming plankton such as diatoms and dinoflagellates22, therefore the phoronid microbiome is potentially highly susceptible to temporal fluctuations reflecting seasonal changes in prey abundance. “Candidatus Scalindua”, on the other hand, is suggested to be involved in anammox reactions in oxygen-depleted sponge tissues, so may have a more direct relationship with the phoronid host23. Bacterial communities in phoronid samples are significantly different from those in the surrounding water (PERMANOVA: p value < 0.01; BETADISPER: p value = < 0.001), which suggests that phoronids do, like other small marine invertebrates3, harbour a distinct bacterial microbiome that is not just a reflection of its environment.
Pairwise comparisons of microbiomes from different phoronid compartments show similar patterns in both collection dates: all comparisons between whole animals (W), naked animals (N), and isolated tubes (T) are significantly different (p value < 0.01), with the exception of whole animals vs. isolated tubes (July—PERMANOVA: p value = 0.614, BETADISPER: 0.069. August—PERMANOVA: p value = 0.248, BETADISPER: 0.690). A similar pattern is also reflected in pairwise Tukey comparisons of Shannon’s Diversity estimates (W vs. T, July—ANOVA: p value = 0.596. W vs. T, August—ANOVA: p value = 0.721. All other comparisons: p value < 0.05; Supplementary Table 1). This strongly suggests that, in terms of anatomical compartments, the tube has the largest influence on overall microbiome composition in phoronids, since its bacterial community is not significantly different from that observed in the whole animal.
Phoronid-associated bacteria are often found in both the tube and the naked animal
To corroborate the impact of different animal compartments on the overall bacterial microbiome, we compared occurrences of ASVs detected in whole animals in libraries from naked specimens, the isolated tube, and the environment (Fig. 3a). Just over half of bacterial sequence variants from whole-animal libraries are also found in both isolated compartments (July: 54.9%, August: 65.7%); we refer to these taxa, belonging to different bacterial phyla, as ‘phoronid generalists’ (W + T + N in Fig. 3a,b). Prevalent generalists include the psychrophilic heterotroph Colwellia (also found in environmental samples from July), and the sulfur-oxidizing Sedimenticola (Fig. 3c); the latter of which falls within a clade of several marine bivalve symbionts24.
Approximately 29.3% (July) and 18.6% (August) of whole-animal-associated ASVs were also found in the surrounding water (W + T + N + E in Fig. 3b), which is in line with previous small invertebrate vs. environment comparisons3. Bacteria in this category belonged to Bacteroidota, Campylobacterota or Proteobacteria and bacterial variants belonging to Vibrionaceae were among the most abundant in all anatomical compartments as well as water (Fig. 3c). This is likely a reflection on filter-feeding and should not be interpreted as true symbioses (although Vibrionaceae ASVs have been observed in other marine invertebrate microbiomes25,26).
Bacterial variants detected in whole-animal and tube-only samples, but absent in naked specimens, were much more prevalent than those shared with naked specimens but absent in isolated tubes (13.4 and 15.7% for W + T vs. 2.4 and 0% for W + N in July and August, respectively; Fig. 3b). Together, these results confirm that the phoronid tube is the main contributing factor impacting overall microbiome composition, although many phoronid ASVs are not strictly limited to spatial niches throughout the body plan.
Conclusions
This first characterization of phoronid microbiomes suggests that these small animals do not harbour a substantial community of eukaryotic symbionts. They do however harbour bacterial communities partially distinct from the environmental background. Phoronid microbiome composition appears to be primarily influenced by bacteria associated with their external tube. However, bacterial sequence variants isolated from whole animals are often found in both the tube and animal tissues.
Materials and methods
Sample collection and processing
Animal samples were obtained from a floating dock in Whaletown Bay on Cortes Island, British Columbia, on July 11 and August 12, 2021. Small fragments (approximately 10 × 5 × 3 cm) of the substrate (inorganic flotation foam) in which the phoronid colony was embedded were collected and colony fragments with the live specimens were maintained in chilled and aerated containers of seawater collected in situ for transportation to the laboratory. Eighty-two specimens were detached from the substrate using sterile dissection tools. Forty-three of these were stored as “whole specimens” (including tissues as well as the chitinous tube) in 70% ethanol. Twenty-one isolated tubes and 39 naked animals were also collected by separating the chitinous tubes from the trunk of the animals using sterile dissection tools. Additionally, 5 phoronids from the same fragments were dissected and inspected using a Leica DM IL LED inverted microscope for the presence of host-associated protists. Animals were imaged in their natural state using a Sony A7rIII with a 50 mm macro lens and a Nauticam underwater housing with two Backscatter MW-4300 lights.
Three 150 ml water samples were collected for each colony, taking water surrounding the animals (originating from the sampling site). Each water sample was passed through a 0.8 μm GF/F Glass Microfiber Filter and the filters were immediately frozen at -80 °C until extraction.
DNA extraction and library preparation
Total genomic DNA was extracted from animal and water samples with the QIAGEN QiaAMP DNA Mini kit. An almost full-length phoronid 18S rRNA gene sequence was obtained from one specimen extracted with the QIAGEN PowerBiofilm Kit, amplified with universal eukaryotic primers A (forward, 5′-AACCTGGTTGATCCTGCCAGT-3′) and B (reverse, 5′-TGATCCTTCYGCAGGTTCACCTAC-3′)27, and sent to GENEWIZ for Sanger sequencing using the same primers. Shorter 18S sequences were obtained from 16 other specimens for confirmation. Attempts to amplify non-metazoan 18S gene sequences from the extracted DNA failed, and 18S libraries obtained with universal eukaryotic primers provided exclusively phoronid sequences (data not shown). Normalized aliquots of the genomic DNA were sent to CGEB-Integrated Microbiome Resource in order to sequence the V4 region of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene on the Illumina MiSeq platform (2 X 300 paired-end sequencing).
Bioinformatics
ASVs were generated in R28 with the DADA2 package (v.1.14.1)29 as described in3. Briefly, primer sequences were removed using Cutadapt (v.3.4)30 and reads were truncated and filtered according to their quality profiles and DADA2 standard filtering parameters (maxN = 0, maxEE = c(2,2), truncQ = 2). Error rates were characterized using the first 100 million bases and libraries were inferred with ‘pseudo’ pooling. Paired-end reads were then merged and used to generate a run-specific error model before chimaera removal and taxonomic classification against the SILVA database (v.138) with the RDP Naive Bayesian Classifier31. The resulting ASV table and taxonomic assignments were combined with library metadata using the phyloseq package (v.1.36.0)32.
The decontam package (v 1.14.0)33 was used to remove potential contaminants using the ‘prevalence’ method and a threshold of 0.5—meaning all sequences more prevalent in negative controls compared to true samples will be considered a contaminant. Eukaryotic, chloroplast and mitochondrial sequences were subsequently removed from the dataset, as were ASVs with a read count of 0 after library filtering. Libraries with < 1,000 reads were removed from further analysis.
ASVs with a total relative abundance < 0.001% in all libraries were removed prior to transforming read counts to centred-log ratios, and ordinating samples with an unconstrained redundancy analysis (the equivalent of a Principal Component Analysis) using Euclidean distance. The adonis function of the vegan package was used to compute a series of PERMANOVAs (using 1000 permutations)34, and to obtain the most significant coefficients driving the statistical difference between colonies. Pairwise PERMANOVAs were computed with the pairwiseAdonis package35. Homogeneity of group dispersions were tested with the betadisper function from the vegan package using the spatial median analysis34, and the TukeyHSD function was used for pairwise comparisons28. Given the statistical difference between microbiomes from different collection dates, all further statistical analyses were performed separately.
ASV richness and Shannon’s Diversity Index were generated using the estimate_richness function from the phyloseq package32. Pairwise comparisons were tested using TukeyHSD on a linear model generated with the aov function from base R stats package28. August Shannon Index data were (cube) transformed before model fitting. Good’s coverage was estimated using goods function from QsRutils36.
To source whole-animal occurring ASVs in different anatomical compartments, all ASVs counts were first transformed to relative abundances (%) and filtered to remove those below 1% and only consider those that were found in whole animal libraries. Three ASVs found in whole animal libraries alone were removed prior to visualisation. Seed value for all functions or plots involving random objects was set to 2209.
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) repository under the BioProject accession number PRJNA927111.
References
Emig, C. C. The biology of Phoronida. Adv. Mar. Biol. 19, 1–89 (1982).
Luo, Y.-J. et al. Nemertean and phoronid genomes reveal lophotrochozoan evolution and the origin of bilaterian heads. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 141–151 (2018).
Boscaro, V. et al. Microbiomes of microscopic marine invertebrates do not reveal signatures of phylosymbiosis. Nat. Microbiol. 7, 810–819 (2022).
Eckert, E. M., Anicic, N. & Fontaneto, D. Freshwater zooplankton microbiome composition is highly flexible and strongly influenced by the environment. Mol. Ecol. 30, 1545–1558 (2021).
Schuelke, T., Pereira, T. J., Hardy, S. M. & Bik, H. M. Nematode-associated microbial taxa do not correlate with host phylogeny, geographic region or feeding morphology in marine sediment habitats. Mol. Ecol. 27, 1930–1951 (2018).
Lokmer, A. & Mathias Wegner, K. Hemolymph microbiome of Pacific oysters in response to temperature, temperature stress and infection. ISME J 9, 670–682 (2015).
Neu, A. T., Hughes, I. V., Allen, E. E. & Roy, K. Decade-scale stability and change in a marine bivalve microbiome. Mol. Ecol. 30, 1237–1250 (2021).
Paillard, C. et al. Recent advances in bivalve-microbiota interactions for disease prevention in aquaculture. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 73, 225–232 (2022).
King, G. M., Judd, C., Kuske, C. R. & Smith, C. Analysis of stomach and gut microbiomes of the eastern oyster (Crassostrea virginica) from coastal Louisiana, USA. PLoS ONE 7, e51475 (2012).
Musella, M. et al. Tissue-scale microbiota of the Mediterranean mussel (Mytilus galloprovincialis) and its relationship with the environment. Sci. Total Environ. 717, 137209 (2020).
Herrmann, K. Induction and regulation of metamorphosis in planktonic larvae: Phoronis mülleri (Tentaculata) as archetype. Helgol. Meeresunters. 49, 255–281 (1995).
Temereva, E. N. & Malakhov, V. V. Microscopic anatomy and ultrastructure of the lophophoral organs and adjacent epithelia of the lophophoral concavity and the anal papilla of Phoronopsis harmeri Pixell, 1912 (Lophophorata: Phoronida). Russ. J. Mar. Biol. 32, 340–352 (2006).
Temereva, E. N., Malakhov, V. V. & Yushin, V. V. Histology and ultrastructure of the body wall in the phoronid Phoronopsis harmeri. Russ. J. Mar. Biol. 27, 156–167 (2001).
Temereva, E., Shcherbakova, T. & Tzetlin, A. First data on the structure of tubes formed by phoronids. Zoology 143, 125849 (2020).
Temereva, E. N. Ground plan of the larval nervous system in phoronids: Evidence from larvae of viviparous phoronid. Evol. Dev. 19, 171–189 (2017).
Hirose, M., Fukiage, R., Katoh, T. & Kajihara, H. Description and molecular phylogeny of a new species of Phoronis (Phoronida) from Japan, with a redescription of topotypes of P. ijimai Oka, 1897. ZooKeys 398, 1–31 (2014).
Holt, C. C. et al. Microscopic marine invertebrates are reservoirs for cryptic and diverse protists and fungi. Microbiome 10, 161 (2022).
Kallscheuer, N. et al. Blastopirellula retiformator sp. Nov. isolated from the shallow-sea hydrothermal vent system close to Panarea Island. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 113, 1811–1822 (2020).
Chen, W.-M., Hsieh, T.-Y. & Sheu, S.-Y. Neptunomonas marina sp. nov., isolated from seawater. Arch. Microbiol. 201, 1053–1060 (2019).
Yoon, J., Matsuda, S., Adachi, K., Kasai, H. & Yokota, A. Rubritalea halochordaticola sp. Nov., a carotenoid-producing verrucomicrobial species isolated from a marine chordate. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 61, 1515–1520 (2011).
Sidhu, C. et al. Dissolved storage glycans shaped the community composition of abundant bacterioplankton clades during a North Sea spring phytoplankton bloom. Microbiome 11, 77 (2023).
Ronan, T. E. Food-resources and the influence of spatial pattern on feeding in the phoronid Phoronopsis viridis. Biol. Bull. 154, 472–484 (1978).
Mohamed, N. M., Saito, K., Tal, Y. & Hill, R. T. Diversity of aerobic and anaerobic ammonia-oxidizing bacteria in marine sponges. ISME J. 4, 38–48 (2010).
Dubilier, N., Bergin, C. & Lott, C. Symbiotic diversity in marine animals: The art of harnessing chemosynthesis. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 6, 725–740 (2008).
Holt, C. C., Van Der Giezen, M., Daniels, C. L., Stentiford, G. D. & Bass, D. Spatial and temporal axes impact ecology of the gut microbiome in juvenile European lobster (Homarus gammarus). ISME J. 14, 531–543 (2020).
Hoffmann, M. et al. Population dynamics of Vibrio spp. associated with marine sponge microcosms. ISME J. 4, 1608–1612 (2010).
Medlin, L., Elwood, H. J., Stickel, S. & Sogin, M. L. The characterization of enzymatically amplified eukaryotic 16S-like rRNA-coding regions. Gene 71, 491–499 (1988).
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, 2023).
Callahan, B. J. et al. DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat. Methods 13, 581–583 (2016).
Martin, M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet J. 17, 10 (2011).
Wang, Q., Garrity, G. M., Tiedje, J. M. & Cole, J. R. Naïve Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73, 5261–5267 (2007).
McMurdie, P. J. & Holmes, S. phyloseq: An R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLoS ONE 8, e61217 (2013).
Davis, N. M., Proctor, D. M., Holmes, S. P., Relman, D. A. & Callahan, B. J. Simple statistical identification and removal of contaminant sequences in marker-gene and metagenomics data. Microbiome 6, 226 (2018).
Oksanen J. vegan: Community Ecology Package (R package version 2.5.7, 2020).
Martinez Arbizu, P. pairwiseAdonis: Pairwise Multilevel Comparison Using Adonis (R package version 0.4, 2020).
Quensen J. QsRutils: R Functions Useful for Community Ecology (R package version 0.1.5, 2020).
Acknowledgements
The project was funded by the Hakai Institute (Tula Foundation) and supported by grants from the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation (https://doi.org/10.37807/GBMF9201). We also thank Gary Fast, Gillian Fast, and Naomi Fast for assistance in the field collection.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The project was conceived and planned by C.C.H, V.B., and P.J.K. P.J.K. is the senior author and provided supervision and funding. C.C.H. analysed the data and produced the figures. C.C.H. and V.B. wrote the original draft of the manuscript. S.D., I.N., M.M. performed the lab work. All authors edited iterative versions of the final manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Holt, C.C., Dhaliwal, S., Na, I. et al. Spatial compartmentalisation of bacteria in phoronid microbiomes. Sci Rep 13, 18612 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-45652-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-45652-9
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.