Abstract
Svalbard fjords are recognized as hotspots for organic carbon (OC) burial and storage due to their high sedimentation rates, which effectively trap terrestrial sediments and inhibit extensive OC remineralization. In this study, we investigated surface sediments (n = 48) from eight Svalbard fjords, along with bedrock (n = 17), soil (n = 28), and plant (n = 12) samples, to identify the sources of sedimentary OC in these fjords using geochemical parameters. All examined surface sediments from the fjords showed a depletion in 14Corg (− 666.9 ± 240.3‰), indicating that recently fixed terrestrial and marine biomass alone cannot account for the entire sedimentary OC pool. Conventional bulk indicators such as Norg/TOC ratio and δ13Corg were insufficient for fully determining the sources of sedimentary OC. Therefore, we employed a four-end-member approach, using Δ14Corg, δ13Corg, and lignin phenols to assess the relative contributions of petrogenic, soil-derived, plant-derived, and marine OC to the sedimentary OC pool. The analyzed fjord sediments consisted, on average, of 59.0 ± 28.1% petrogenic OC, 16.8 ± 12.1% soil-derived OC, 2.5 ± 2.2% plant-derived OC, and 21.8 ± 18.5% marine OC. This approach highlights the substantial contributions of petrogenic and aged soil-derived OC to present-day sedimentary OC in Svalbard fjords. Considering predicted global warming, accelerated inputs of petrogenic and soil-derived OC into fjords due to rapid glacier retreat may significantly impact the active carbon cycle and potentially contribute to CO2 emissions to the atmosphere, depending on burial efficiency.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
In recent decades, the ‘land-to-ocean aquatic continuum’ between ‘terra firme’ terrestrial ecosystems and the open ocean has received considerable attention as aquatic critical zones in regulating the global carbon cycle on annual to centennial timescales1,2. Among these aquatic critical zones, fjords, mainly located in the mid-high latitudes, represent a relatively small fraction of the global continental margin (< 0.1%)3. Nevertheless, they serve as biogeochemical hotspots that effectively trap and store substantial amounts of organic carbon (OC)1,4,5. Annually, approximately 18 million tons of marine and terrigenous OC are buried in glacially depressed basins within fjords, accounting for approximately 11% of the global marine OC burial6 and 17 ± 12% of the global terrestrial OC burial7. As a result, the OC burial per unit area in fjords largely exceeds the global ocean average, making them a sensitive system for sequestering CO2 and regulating the global carbon cycle over geological time1,6.
The high-Arctic Svalbard archipelago (74–81° N, 10–35° E), with glaciers covering approximately 57% of its land masses, is located at the gateway between the North Atlantic and Arctic Oceans (Fig. 1). Spitsbergen is the largest island in the archipelago, characterized by its numerous fjords, some of which experience seasonal sea surface freezing during winter8. In recent decades, the fjords on the west coast of Spitsbergen have undergone significant hydrographic changes attributed to the intensified West Spitsbergen Current (WSC), which brings warm and saline Atlantic water into the fjords9,10,11. Furthermore, the Svalbard archipelago has experienced rising air temperatures and increased precipitation, leading to the retreat of marine- and land-terminating glaciers and increased freshwater discharge12,13,14,15. Due to increased WSC inflow and freshwater runoff, these hydrographic changes can potentially affect marine primary productivity and trigger the release of substantial amounts of terrestrial sediments to the fjords8,13,16. Consequently, these changes can alter the sources of sedimentary OC and significantly impact long-term OC burial in fjord sediments. Hence, the Spitsbergen fjords are regarded as areas susceptible to global warming17,18, making them ideal sites for studying the responses of high-Arctic fjords to current and projected future climate change.
Previous studies in Svalbard fjords have examined the spatial variability of OC composition in surface sediments and assessed the relative proportions of marine and terrestrial OC using bulk elemental (Norg/TOC ratio) and isotopic (δ13Corg) parameters19,20,21,22,23. However, these approaches often assume that the selected end-member (marine versus terrestrial) values represent the entire Svalbard region and treat all land-derived OC as a single terrestrial source. Nonetheless, it's important to recognize that land-derived OC is itself heterogeneous, comprising OC derived from both plants and soils (referred to as “terrestrial biogenic” OC), and bedrocks (referred to as “petrogenic” OC). Consequently, relying solely on conventional bulk organic parameters does not adequately capture the diverse sources of terrestrial OC in the sedimentary OC pool. Furthermore, only a limited number of studies have investigated surface sediments at the molecular level in Svalbard fjords, aiming to gain insights into different terrestrial OC sources23,24,25. Notably, the relative proportion of petrogenic and aged soil-derived OC to the total OC pool in Svalbard fjords remains largely unknown, despite their potential implications for active regional carbon cycling24,25,26. Therefore, a more comprehensive study investigating the contributions of petrogenic and soil-derived OC across Svalbard fjords is still necessary.
In this study, we conducted comprehensive analyses on surface sediments (n = 48) collected from eight Svalbard fjords (Fig. 1, see also Table S1 in Supplementary Information). Our analyses encompassed both bulk (stable and radioactive isotopic compositions) and molecular (lignin phenols) parameters to enhance our understanding of OC sources. Additionally, we performed grain size and Nd isotope analyses to identify geological characteristics related to the surrounding bedrock types. Furthermore, we analyzed bedrock (n = 17), soil (n = 28), and plant (n = 12) samples to constrain end-member values of OC sources (Supplementary Table S2 and Fig. S1). Our main objectives were to (1) constrain the diverse sources of sedimentary OC and (2) estimate their relative contributions to fjord sediments. The results of our study provide valuable qualitative and quantitative assessments of OC sources and compositions in the fjords of Svalbard. Furthermore, this study advances our understanding of carbon cycling in Svalbard fjords by offering new insights into biomarker data and highlighting the significant contribution of petrogenic and aged soil-derived OC to the present-day sedimentary OC pool.
Results
Sediment properties
The mean grain size of the fjord surface sediments was between 5.8 μm and 16.7 μm (average ± standard deviation (SD); 9.9 ± 3.2 μm, n = 48), and a predominant proportion of silt (63.7 ± 6.5%), followed by clay (28.1 ± 8.8%), and sand (8.2 ± 7.2%) was observed (Supplementary Table S1 and Fig. S2). The sorting value ranged from 1.4 to 2.4 (1.8 ± 0.2, n = 48), showing that most of the surface sediments in the fjords were poorly sorted (Supplementary Table S1 and Fig. S2).
Bulk elemental and isotopic compositions
The total organic carbon (TOC) content in the fjord surface sediments varied between 0.12 wt.% and 2.80 wt.% (Supplementary Table S1 and Fig. S3). The total nitrogen (Ntot) and total organic nitrogen (Norg) contents ranged from 0.01 to 0.26 wt.% and 0.01 to 0.20 wt.%, respectively (Supplementary Table S1 and Fig. S3). The Ntot/TOC ratios ranged from 0.04 to 0.20, whereas the Norg/TOC ratios were lower, ranging from 0.01 to 0.13 (Supplementary Table S1 and Fig. S4). The δ13Corg values exhibited a wide range of variation between − 18.0‰ and − 26.9‰ (Supplementary Table S1 and Fig. S4), and the Δ14Corg values ranged from − 961.3‰ to − 219.0‰ (Supplementary Table S1).
In the plant samples collected around Longyearbyen, the TOC contents varied between 40.8 and 60.4 wt.% (47.7 ± 5.7 wt.%, n = 12; Supplementary Table S2). The soil samples collected around Longyearbyen and Ny-Ålesund showed the TOC contents ranging from 0.1 to 85.1 wt.% (9.9 ± 16.5 wt.%, n = 28), respectively. Most bedrock samples exhibited low TOC contents (0.3 ± 0.4 wt.%, n = 14), except for the coal samples (51.6 ± 7.0 wt.%, n = 3). The δ13Corg values of the plant samples ranged from − 35.2 to − 28.8‰ (− 31.4 ± 1.6‰, n = 12; Supplementary Table S2), whereas the soil samples displayed values of − 30.3‰ to − 17.5‰ (− 25.2 ± 2.8‰, n = 28). The δ13Corg values of the bedrock samples varied between − 29.0 and − 23.2‰ (− 25.8 ± 2.0‰, n = 17).
Nd isotopic compositions
In this study, we newly measured neodymium isotopes from detrital components of surface sediments (n = 19) and compiled previous measurements (n = 29)27. The detrital εNd values ranged from − 24.9 to − 8.9 (− 14.2 ± 2.9, n = 48; Supplementary Table S1). The highest detrital εNd value was found in Hambergbukta at an average value of − 9.2 ± 0.3 (n = 3), while the lowest value was found in Wijdefjorden at an average value of − 15.2 ± 0.6 (n = 6). Notably, the detrital εNd in Hornsund showed a wide range of values from − 24.9 to − 10.1 (− 14.9 ± 3.9, n = 24).
Lignin phenol signatures
We reported the total lignin phenol concentration (λ) as the sum of eight lignin-derived monomeric phenols, including vanillyl (V; vanillin, acetovanillone, and vanillic acid), syringyl (S; syringaldehyde, acetosyringone, and syringic acid), and cinnamyl (C; p-coumaric acid and ferulic acid) units normalized to TOC. In the surface sediments of the fjords, λ ranged from 0.001 to 0.52 mg/g OC, with an average of 0.14 ± 0.15 mg/g OC (n = 48). The highest concentration was observed in Wijdefjorden (0.40 ± 0.08 mg/g OC, n = 6), while the lowest value was found in Hornsund (0.03 ± 0.02 mg/g OC, n = 24; Supplementary Table S3). The ratios of syringyl to vanillyl (S/V) and cinnamyl to vanillyl (C/V) varied between 0.05 and 0.62 (0.26 ± 0.13, n = 48) and 0.05 and 2.44 (0.46 ± 0.55, n = 48), respectively. The CuO oxidation also produced 3,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid (3,5-Bd) with concentrations ranging from 0.003 to 0.76 mg/g OC (0.15 ± 0.19 mg/g OC, n = 48), and the ratio of 3,5-Bd to vanillyl phenols (3.5-Bd/V) varied between 0.41 and 4.22 (1.81 ± 1.04, n = 48). The acid-to-aldehyde (Ad/Al) ratios of vanillyl (V) phenols ((Ad/Al)v) varied between 0.09 and 2.01 (0.81 ± 0.46, n = 48).
The plant samples exhibited λ values ranging from 6.19 to 62.19 mg/g OC (26.10 ± 20.50 mg/g OC, n = 12; Supplementary Table S2). On the other hand, the soil samples displayed a concentration ranging from 0.14 to 12.41 mg/g OC (4.44 ± 4.72 mg/g OC, n = 28). The S/V and C/V ratios of the plant samples ranged from 0.01 to 0.44 (0.19 ± 0.16, n = 12) and 0.19 to 3.32 (1.03 ± 1.02, n = 12), respectively. For the soil samples, the S/V and C/V ratios ranged from 0.03 to 0.71 (0.30 ± 0.15, n = 28) and 0.01 to 0.32 (0.07 ± 0.07, n = 28), respectively. The 3,5-Bd concentrations of the plant and soil samples varied between 0.36 and 1.86 mg/g OC (1.00 ± 0.49 mg/g OC, n = 12) and between 0.03 and 3.59 mg/g OC (1.04 ± 1.24 mg/g OC, n = 28), respectively. The 3,5-Bd/V ratio of the plant and soil samples had average values of 0.28 ± 0.12 (n = 12) and 0.34 ± 0.28 (n = 28), respectively. The (Ad/Al)v ratios of the plant and soil samples ranged from 0.23 to 0.46 (0.33 ± 0.09, n = 12) and from 0.27 to 5.16 (1.37 ± 1.47, n = 28), respectively. Notably, lignin phenols were not detected in most of the freshly unweathered bedrocks (n = 14) analyzed in this study (Supplementary Table S2). However, lignin phenols and 3,5-Bd were detected in the coal samples (n = 3) at low concentrations (λ: 0.01 ± 0.01 mg/g OC, 3,5-Bd: 0.01 ± 0.01 mg/g OC), interestingly higher than in some surface sediments in Hornsund. The S/V and C/V ratios of the coal samples ranged from 0.05 to 0.11 (0.07 ± 0.03, n = 3) and from 0.05 to 0.07 (0.06 ± 0.01, n = 3), respectively. The 3,5-Bd/V and (Ad/Al)v ratios were found to be 0.47 ± 0.13 (n = 3) and 0.49 ± 0.16 (n = 3), respectively.
Discussion
Characteristics of sedimentary organic matter
The TOC values obtained from the fjord surface sediments (1.5 ± 0.7 wt.%, n = 48; Supplementary Table S1) were within the range of those previously reported for Svalbard fjords (1.7 ± 1.0 wt.%, n = 64)19,21,22,23,28,29. Notably, no apparent correlation was observed between the TOC content and the mean grain size of the surface sediments, which predominantly consisted of silt and clay fractions (Supplementary Fig. S2). Furthermore, the TOC content showed no clear relationship with the sediment sorting (Ф), which indicated that the fjord surface sediments were poorly sorted (Supplementary Fig. S2). Hence, the sediment samples analyzed in this study represent typically fine-grained sediments deposited in glacimarine environments within Svalbard fjords8,30,31.
Previous studies conducted in Svalbard fjords have revealed the presence of inorganic nitrogen (N) bound in clay minerals, which accounted for up to 70% of the Ntot content19,20,21,28. As depicted in the Ntot versus Norg plot (Fig. 2A), the surface sediments examined in this study also showed a significant contribution of inorganic N (45 ± 20%, n = 48). Therefore, it is strongly recommended to consider the fraction of Ninorg when assessing the source of organic matter in the Arctic region18,32. Consequently, the Norg/TOC ratio, rather than the Ntot/TOC ratio, serves as a better indicator for characterizing the sources of sedimentary OC (marine versus terrestrial) in Svalbard fjords. δ13Corg is another tool commonly used to identify sedimentary OC sources in Svalbard fjords19,32. The Norg/TOC ratio versus δ13Corg plot suggests that the fjord surface sediments, as observed in previous studies of Svalbard fjords19, represent a mixture of terrestrial and marine OC (Fig. 2B, see also Supplementary Fig. S5). In general, C3 plant-derived terrestrial OC has depleted δ13Corg values between − 29.3 and − 25.5‰, while marine OC has more enriched δ13Corg values between − 17.0 and − 25.0‰19,22,33,34,35. Previous studies in Svalbard fjords have often used the similar end-member values for terrestrial and marine OC, as documented in Supplementary Table S5 and Fig. S6. However, it is noteworthy that in Kongsfjorden, where more research has been conducted, there is an overlap in the end-member values of terrestrial and marine OC. Consequently, assigning terrestrial and marine end-member values based on the conventional bulk indicator (δ13Corg) to determine the quantitative proportions of sedimentary OC remains challenging.
Following the approach by Knies et al.20 and incorporating our new data, we attempted to assign terrestrial and marine OC end-member values based on the correlations between the Norg/TOC ratio and δ13Corg, as well as between δ13Corg and %Norg (defined as Norg/Ntot %), respectively (Fig. 2). Assuming that Norg represents marine-originated N exclusively, a terrestrial end-member value of − 25.6‰ was obtained as the intercept at Norg/TOC = 0, with a 95% confidence interval error range of − 25.8 to − 25.4‰ (Fig. 2B). Similarly, a marine end-member value of − 19.9‰ (− 20.1 to − 19.7‰ with a 95% confidence interval error range) was defined as 100% of %Norg, i.e., 100% Norg in the Ntot fraction (Fig. 2C). These end-member values were slightly higher than those previously published (− 26.1‰ for the terrestrial end-member and − 20.1‰ for the marine end-member)19. This difference can be attributed to the larger variability in the data from Svalbard fjords, particularly for data from Kross/Kongsfjorden. It is worth noting that a previous study29 reported δ13Corg values ranging from − 23.8 to − 20.3‰ (− 22.6 ± 0.1‰, n = 4) for fine-grained ice-rafted debris (IRD) samples collected in Kross/Kongsfjorden. These δ13Corg values were relatively enriched compared to the soils collected around Kross/Kongsfjorden, which varied from − 27.1 to − 25.2‰ (− 26.1 ± 0.6‰, n = 15)29. Additionally, our newly acquired soil data from the Ny-Ålesund region exhibited similarly depleted δ13Corg values ranging from − 26.4 to − 17.5‰ (− 23.6 ± 2.5‰, n = 16; Supplementary Table S2), consistent with previously published soil data27. Notably, the δ13Corg values of the surface sediment samples collected near marine-terminating glaciers in Kross/Kongsfjorden fell within the range of the IRD samples (Fig. 3A, see also Supplementary Fig. S7). Furthermore, the surface sediment samples collected from Hornsund showed large variations in the Norg/TOC ratio and δ13Corg, which corresponded to the variations observed in detrital εNd (Fig. 3B,C). Detrital εNd is commonly used to identify changes in sediment provenance27 because bedrocks exhibit characteristic Nd isotopes that depend on their geological rock types and ages. These isotopes can be reflected in sedimentary εNd values without substantial fractionation during weathering and biological processes36. Compared to other fjords, the observed variability in εNd values in Hornsund primarily reflects the diverse bedrock geology in the surrounding catchment areas27, which ranges from Precambrian metamorphic rocks to Cenozoic sedimentary rocks37. Higher detrital εNd values were generally associated with sediments near the glacial outflow, which drains early Palaeozoic sedimentary rocks. In comparison, lower detrital εNd values were observed in innermost fjords dominated by Middle Jurassic to early Cretaceous sedimentary rocks27,37 (see Supplementary Figs. S8 and S9). This finding suggests that OC originating from some bedrocks can be transported into Hornsund, resulting in potentially large variations in the Norg/TOC ratio and δ13Corg. Consequently, our results indicate that bulk parameters such as the Norg/TOC ratio and δ13Corg alone cannot fully resolve the heterogeneous sources of sedimentary OC in Svalbard fjords.
Contribution of petrogenic OC
The Δ14C values of the surface sediments in Svalbard fjords were consistently depleted in 14C (− 666.9 ± 240.3‰, n = 28, Fig. 3A,D). This depletion aligns with findings from previous studies conducted in Hornsund and Kross/Kongsfjorden, where surface sediments exhibited Δ14C values ranging from − 952 to − 203‰24,25,29. Carbon dioxide (CO2) used for terrestrial or marine primary production, originating from the atmosphere, exhibits a positive 14C signal38,39, as demonstrated at Alert during the period of 2015–2019 with an average Δ14C value of 9.1 ± 6.4‰40. Therefore, fjord surface sediments that predominantly contain modern terrestrial or marine OC should not exhibit a strong depletion in 14C, assuming the absence of abiotic processes causing 14C offsets. As suggested by the previous study29, the significant depletion of 14C in the fjord surface sediments suggests that recently fixed terrestrial and marine OC alone is not the exclusive contributor to sedimentary OC. Instead, a substantial amount of old OC was also contributed, which could not be revealed solely by the Norg/TOC ratio and δ13Corg.
To identify the source of 14C-depleted OC in sedimentary OC in Svalbard fjords, we defined two OC components: ‘petrogenic’ OC, representing radiocarbon-‘dead’ OC sourced from bedrocks, and ‘biogenic’ OC, encompassing biomass fixed via photosynthesis in terrestrial and marine environments7. By assuming the end-member values of Δ14Cpetrogenic = − 1000‰ and Δ14Cbiogenic = 9.1‰, we estimated the relative proportions of ‘14C-assessed’ petrogenic and biogenic OC to the sedimentary OC pool. The end-member Δ14Corg value of biogenic OC was assumed to be represented by the 14C composition of atmospheric CO2 at Alert during the period of 2015–201940, taking into account the sampling period of our surface sediments (Supplementary Table S2). The petrogenic OC fraction of TOC varied between 22.6 and 96.2% (60.0 ± 23.8%, n = 28), while the biogenic OC fraction varied between 3.8 and 77.4% (33.0 ± 23.0%, n = 28). Among the studied fjords, van Mijenfjorden (87.7 ± 8.8%, n = 3) and Hornsund (84.4 ± 13.6%, n = 10) displayed higher relative proportions of petrogenic OC, whereas Wijdefjorden (70.5 ± 5.2%, n = 6) exhibited higher relative proportions of biogenic OC. These results indicate a substantial contribution of petrogenic OC to Svalbard fjords, consistent with previous findings in Kross/Kongsfjorden29. However, characterizing biogenic OC with a Δ14C of 9.1‰ alone is likely an oversimplification in Svalbard fjords. This is because biogenic OC encompasses not only recently fixed terrestrial and marine biomass but also pre-aged OC derived from soils, which can be transported to fjords through glacial erosion and/or meltwater discharge.
Contribution of aged soil-derived OC
To enhance our understanding of the source of 14C-depleted OC in Svalbard fjords, we further defined biogenic OC comprising both more recently fixed terrestrial and marine biomass as well as pre-aged OC derived from soils. Previous studies conducted in Kross/Kongsfjorden indicated a low contribution of fresh plant- and soil-derived OC to the sedimentary OC pool, likely due to the limited soil formation in the cold Arctic environment29,41. However, a more recent study in the Ny-Ålesund region revealed potential inputs of deep active layer/permafrost OC in the Bayelva River and its river mouth24. Thus, considering the potential input of OC derived from pre-aged soils, we calculated the relative proportions of petrogenic and biogenic OC to sedimentary OC by applying the binary mixing model proposed by Galy et al.42 as follows:
where TOCsample represents the TOC content (wt.%) in the sample, Fmsample is the measured 14C composition of the sample expressed as the fraction of modern C, Fmbio is the 14C composition of biogenic OC, and OCpetro is the content of petrogenic OC in wt.%. Although this approach was successfully applied to the Beaufort Sea43, we did not observe a similar linear relationship between the TOCsample and TOCsample × Fmsample in Svalbard fjords (Supplementary Fig. S10). This discrepancy can be attributed to the fact that the assumption of a constant background level of petrogenic OC in all investigated samples, as suggested by Galy et al.42, is not applicable in Svalbard fjords. This might be due to the presence of complex bedrock types in the catchment areas (Supplementary Fig. S8)27,37, as well as the varying rates of glacier retreat observed in Svalbard fjords44. Consequently, different quantities of terrestrial sediments, including terrestrial OC, would have been supplied to the fjords.
Four OC source apportionments
To further explore the potential contribution of aged soil-derived OC to Svalbard fjords, we examined lignin phenols obtained through alkaline CuO oxidation. Lignin phenols are widely used as valuable terrestrial biomarkers due to their unique synthesis by higher vascular plants45,46. The ratios of S/V and C/V, which are indicators of lignin sources, have been utilized to assess the relative proportions of non-woody angiosperm to woody gymnosperm contributions in various aquatic environments46,47. In the surface sediments of the fjords, lignin phenols mainly consisted of a mixture of non-woody gymnosperm OC with inputs from gymnosperm wood-derived tissues. The fjord surface sediments exhibited similar lignin phenol characteristics to the plants and soils collected around Ny-Ålesund and Longyearbyen (Fig. 4A). However, the ratio of 3,5-Bd/vanillyl phenols (3,5-Bd/V), an indicator of the degradation state of complex terrestrial organic mixtures48, and used as a proxy for the relative contributions of soil-derived OC versus vascular plant-derived OC in aquatic environments49, was generally higher in the fjord surface sediments compared to the plants and soils (Fig. 4B). The ratio of vanillic acid to vanillin ((Ad/Al)v) is commonly used as an index for lignin oxidative degradation by aerobic degraders50,51,52. Ratios of (Ad/Al)v lower than 0.3 are commonly associated with relatively fresh vascular plant detritus, whereas ratios exceeding 0.5 are typically observed in extensively altered soils with significantly depleted Δ14Corg signatures45. Many of the surface sediments in Svalbard fjords exhibited (Ad/Al)v ratios well above 0.5 (Fig. 4C). Furthermore, principal component analysis (PCA) based on the concentrations of lignin phenols and 3,5-Bd also revealed that most of the fjord surface sediments were distinct from the investigated plants and soils (Supplementary Fig. S11). These findings suggest that the terrestrial OC in the fjord surface sediments had undergone more significant degradation compared to the plants and soils analyzed in this study.
In addition to exposed soils resulting from glacier retreat, another potential source of aged and highly degraded soil-derived OC is subglacial sediments in glacier-covered areas, such as the Svalbard catchments. During glacier advances, plants, soils, and fjord sediments were overridden by glaciers, leading to the burial of substantial amounts of OC within subglacial sediments53,54,55. As a result of climate warming, melting glaciers can transport these subglacial sediments and associated OC to the fjords1, contributing to the presence of aged and highly degraded soil-derived OC. It is worth noting that the soil samples analyzed in this study were obtained from the active layers in glacier-exposed areas. Interestingly, no significant differences were observed between samples collected at deeper depths (20–30 cm) of the soil profiles and those collected at shallower depths (0–10 cm) in the vicinity of the retreating land-terminating glacier in the Ny-Ålesund region (Supplementary Fig. S11). Therefore, we did not differentiate between OC derived from active layer/permafrost soils and subglacial sediments but instead collectively referred to them as ‘aged soil-derived’ OC for further discussion. Overall, our findings suggest the presence of highly degraded and aged soil-derived OC in the fjord surface sediments, likely originating from subglacial sediments and/or active layer/permafrost soils. These findings highlight the importance of considering this source when studying OC dynamics in Svalbard fjords.
To estimate the relative proportions of petrogenic, soil-derived, plant-derived, and marine OC in the sedimentary OC of Svalbard fjords, we utilized a four-source apportionment approach based on Δ14Corg, δ13Corg, and (Ad/Al)v ratio, employing a Monte Carlo (MC) analysis56,57. In the initial stage, we constrained the end-member values for each OC source (Supplementary Table S6) using newly generated and compiled data (see Supplementary Table S2). The proportions of OC sources varied, with petrogenic OC comprising the highest proportion at 59.0 ± 28.1% (n = 25), followed by marine OC at 21.8 ± 18.5% (n = 25), soil-derived OC at 16.8 ± 12.1% (n = 25), and plant-derived OC at 2.5 ± 2.2% (n = 25) (Fig. 5, see also Supplementary Fig. S12). The relative proportions of petrogenic OC were found to be higher in van Mijenfjorden (84.2 ± 10.1%, n = 3) and Hornsund (79.2 ± 18.3%, n = 8), possibly due to their higher glacier retreat rates compared to other fjords44. Notably, the surface sediments in Wijdefjorden exhibited more enriched δ13Corg values than the other fjords, resulting in relatively higher contributions of marine-derived OC (46.8 ± 2.8%, n = 6) and soil-derived OC (33.9 ± 8.3%, n = 6) to the sedimentary OC pool. Our study demonstrated that the four-source apportionment approach based on Δ14Corg, δ13Corg, and the (Ad/Al)v ratio can provide reasonable estimates of the relative contributions of different OC sources to sedimentary OC in Svalbard fjords. However, further investigation is necessary to address the issue of overlapping end-member values of δ13Corg, particularly in Kross/Kongsfjorden, by analyzing additional background samples such as soils, subglacial sediments, and fjord sediments collected in the vicinity of tidewater glacier fronts. This further analysis would help in better constraining the end-member values for each parameter considered and improving the accuracy of the apportionment approach.
Potential future implication on fjord carbon dynamics
In temperate fjords with vegetation-dominated catchments, such as New Zealand fjords, the input of petrogenic OC is negligible7. In such environments, the effective burial of OC derived from more recently fixed terrestrial and marine biomass in fjord sediments can remove OC from the active carbon cycle. However, high-latitude fjords with glacier-dominated catchments, like those in Svalbard, experience the export of previously sequestered petrogenic OC to complex fjord systems58. This old OC can be remineralized during transport or within the fjords, thus impacting the active carbon cycle as a source of CO2 to the atmosphere59,60. In the case of the Svalbard fjords, the marine-terminating glaciers have undergone rapid retreat in recent decades61. As a result, there has been an increased export of OC from the hinterland to the fjords23,62, which is expected to accelerate in the near future due to projected climate warming6. Consequently, the amplified input of petrogenic and aged soil OC to Svalbard fjords may contribute to atmospheric CO2, despite its refractory nature, if this old OC is not effectively reburied but instead undergoes remineralization59,60,63. This positive carbon feedback mechanism in Svalbard fjords requires further investigation.
Conclusions
In this study, we conducted a comprehensive analysis of the OC sources in surface sediments from Svalbard fjords, employing a combination of bulk and molecular geochemical parameters. Our findings revealed that the surface sediments in Svalbard fjords exhibit depleted Δ14Corg values and a wide range of Norg/TOC and δ13Corg values. These observations suggest that the sedimentary OC sources in Svalbard fjords cannot be adequately explained by a simple binary mixing model considering only marine and terrestrial OC. To overcome this limitation, we applied a MC approach, utilizing Δ14Corg, δ13Corg, and (Ad/Al)v values, to estimate the relative contributions of different OC sources to the sedimentary OC pool. This approach allowed us to discern the proportions of petrogenic, soil-derived, plant-derived, and marine OC in the sediment samples. Our analysis provides important insights into the sources of OC in Svalbard fjords, with a particular emphasis on the substantial contributions of petrogenic and aged soil-derived OC to the recent sedimentary OC pool. Furthermore, our study highlights the potential implications of predicted climate warming on the active carbon cycle in the Svalbard fjords. With the anticipated acceleration of glacier retreat, there will be an increased export of petrogenic and aged soil-derived OC to these fjords. This influx of OC has the potential to release additional CO2 into the atmosphere, thereby influencing the dynamics of the active carbon cycle25. Furthermore, the increased influxes of land-derived OC could alter ecosystem structure and function in Svalbard fjords, as demonstrated in Greenland fjords64.
Materials and methods
Sampling of marine surface sediments, plants, and soils
We collected a total of 45 surface sediment samples using a giant box corer (50 × 50 × 50 cm3) from seven Svalbard fjord systems: Wijdefjorden (n = 6), Woodfjorden (n = 2), Dicksonfjorden (n = 2), Isfjorden (n = 2), van Mijenfjorden (n = 6), Hornsund (n = 24), and Hambergbukta (n = 3). These samples were obtained during Korea-Norway International joint cruises in Svalbard conducted in 2015, 2016, 2017, and 2019 aboard R/V Helmer Hanssesn of UiT The Arctic University of Norway (Fig. 1, see also Supplementary Table S1). Additionally, three surface sediment samples were collected using a multicorer in Krossfjorden in 2015 on MS Teisten. In July 2021, we sampled the most dominant vascular plant species (Cassiope, Salix, Moss, and Dryas) and the 5–10 cm depth of soils (n = 4) with three replicates each in Longyearbyen (see Supplementary Table S2 and Fig. S1). Additionally, we utilized soil samples collected around Ny-Ålesund at depths of 0–10 cm (n = 12) and 20–30 cm (n = 4), previously used by Kim et al.65 and Jung et al.66. All plant samples used in this study were collected with the permission of the governor of Svalbard (RiS-ID 10547), and the plant species were identified by Yoo Kyung Lee from the Korea Polar Research Institute (KOPRI). These materials are deposited at KOPRI. Furthermore, in addition to the 14 bedrock samples used by Jang et al.27, we collected three coal samples near Ny-Ålesund in 2022. Please refer to Supplementary Table S2 for more details on the sample locations and characteristics.
Grain size analysis
The grain size distributions were determined following a procedure previously reported by Kim et al.43. Briefly, samples (~ 1 g) oxidized with 5 mL of H2O2 (35%) were analyzed for grain sizes smaller than 63 μm using a Mastersizer 3000 laser particle size analyzer (Malvern Panalytical B.V, Netherlands) at KOPRI. The analytical precision was as follows: D(10): 37.5 ± 0.3 μm, D(50): 71.4 ± 0.2 μm, and D(90): 104.0 ± 0.0 μm. Mean grain size and sediment sorting were estimated according to Folk and Ward67.
Bulk organic geochemical analysis
Bulk elemental and stable isotope analyses were conducted following the methods described by Kim et al.43. In brief, the TOC content of samples decalcified with 10% HCl for 24 h, the nitrogen contents in both bulk (total nitrogen, Ntot) and KOBr/KOH-treated (inorganic nitrogen, Ninorg) samples, and carbon isotopic compositions were determined at KOPRI using an elemental analyzer (Thermo Electron Corporation Flash EA 2000, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Germany) coupled with an isotope ratio mass spectrometer (Finnigan Delta Plus, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Germany). The carbon isotope ratios of TOC (δ13Corg) were reported using δ notation (per mil) with respect to the Vienna Pee Dee Belemnite (VPDB). The analytical precision was better than 0.5 wt.% and 0.5‰ for carbon and 0.5 wt.% for nitrogen. Accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) radiocarbon (14C) analyses of TOC were performed at the MICADAS radiocarbon laboratory at the Alfred-Wegener Institute (AWI, Bremerhaven, Germany) and the Center for Applied Isotope Studies at the University of Georgia (CAIS, Georgia, USA), following standard procedures. Radiocarbon results were presented in Delta notation (Δ14Corg, ‰), as defined by Stuiver and Polach68.
Neodymium isotope analysis
Sequential extraction from bulk sediments and Nd isotopic analysis of the remaining detrital fractions were conducted according to the procedure described by Jang et al.27. Briefly, sediments (~ 100 mg) were chemically leached to obtain detrital fractions by removing the carbonate and authigenic fractions. All detrital fraction analyses were performed using a thermal ionization mass spectrometer (TIMS, Triton, Thermo Scientific) at KOPRI. The Nd isotope ratios were normalized to a 144Nd/146Nd value of 0.7219 to correct for mass fractionation. The analytical precision was 0.3 εNd units for the measured Nd isotopic compositions.
Lignin phenols analysis
CuO oxidation of the samples was and analyses were conducted following the method described by Kim et al.43. Briefly, microwave-assisted alkaline CuO oxidation was carried out on ~ 400 mg of the samples using a Microwave Digestion System (MARS 6 microwave, CEM Corporation, USA) at 150 °C for 1.5 h. All analyses were performed at KOPRI using an Agilent 7890B GC coupled to a 5977B Series Mass Selective Detector (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) operating in single ion monitoring (SIM) mode using a DB1-MS capillary column (30 m × 0.25 mm, 0.25 μm, Agilent J&W). The analytical precision associated with the lignin phenol concentrations was typically less than 10%.
Statistical analysis
PCA was performed to provide an overview of the distribution of lignin phenols in fjord surface sediments, plants, and soils. When some components fell below the detection limit, a value of one-half of the minimum value detected for that variable across the entire dataset was assigned as the limit of detection69. The PCA of the lignin phenol concentrations was performed using R software version 4.0.3, specifically utilizing the FactoMineR package. To estimate the relative contributions of petrogenic, soil-derived, plant-derived, and marine OC to sedimentary OC in the fjords, a mixing model based on a Monte Carlo (MC) approach was employed (see Supplementary Information). This model incorporated Δ14Corg, δ13Corg, and (Ad/Al)v values (see Supplementary Table S6) and accounted for natural variations in end-members as well as measurement uncertainties, following previous studies56,57. In this statistical model, the variability of each end-member (i.e., petrogenic, soil-derived, plant-derived, and marine OC sources) was described as normal distributions with mean and standard deviations. The MC analysis was performed using R software version 4.0.3, with the MixSIAR package.
Ethical approval
The authors promise that the experimental research and field studies on plants complied with relevant institutional, national, and international guidelines and legislation.
Data availability
All data generated and compiled in this study are presented in the Supplementary Information and will be available from the corresponding author upon request.
References
Bianchi, T. S. et al. Fjords as aquatic critical zones (ACZs). Earth Sci. Rev. 203, 103145 (2020).
Regnier, P. et al. The land-to-ocean loops of the global carbon cycle. Nature 603, 401–410 (2022).
Syvitski, J. P. M., Burrell, D. C. & Skei, J. M. Chapter 5: Subaqueous slope failure. In Fjords 175–209 (Springer, 1987).
Nuwer, J. M. & Keil, R. G. Sedimentary organic matter geochemistry of Clayoquot Sound, Vancouver Island, British Columbia. Limnol. Oceanogr. 50, 1119–1128 (2005).
Bianchi, T. S. et al. Centers of organic carbon burial and oxidation at the land-ocean interface. Org. Geochem. 115, 138–155 (2018).
Smith, R. W., Bianchi, T. S., Allison, M., Savage, C. & Galy, V. High rates of organic carbon burial in fjord sediments globally. Nat. Geosci. 8, 450–453 (2015).
Cui, X., Bianchi, T. S. & Savage, C. Erosion of modern terrestrial organic matter as a major component of sediments in fjords. Geophys. Res. Lett. 44, 1457–1465 (2016).
Svendsen, H. et al. The physical environment of Kongsfjorden-Krossfjorden, an Arctic fjord system in Svalbard. Polar Res. 21, 133–166 (2002).
Jernas, P. et al. Annual changes in Arctic fjord environment and modern benthic foraminiferal fauna: Evidence from Kongsfjorden, Svalbard. Glob. Planet. Change 163, 119–140 (2018).
Krajewska, M. et al. Climate change impact on primary production and phytoplankton taxonomy in Western Spitsbergen fjords based on pigments in sediments. Glob. Planet. Change 189, 103158 (2020).
Skogseth, R. et al. Variability and decadal trends in the Isfjorden (Svalbard) ocean climate and circulation—An indicator for climate change in the European Arctic. Prog. Oceanogr. 187, 102394 (2020).
Tarnocai, C. et al. Soil organic carbon pools in the northern circumpolar permafrost region. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 23, GB2023 (2009).
Błaszczyk, M. et al. Freshwater input to the Arctic fjord Hornsund (Svalbard). Polar Res. 38, 3506 (2019).
van Pelt, W. et al. A long-term dataset of climatic mass balance, snow conditions, and runoff in Svalbard (1957–2018). Cryosphere 13, 2259–2280 (2019).
McGovern, M. et al. Terrestrial inputs drive seasonality in organic matter and nutrient biogeochemistry in a high Arctic fjord system (Isfjorden, Svalbard). Front. Mar. Sci. 7, 542563 (2020).
Zhang, F. et al. Effects of Arctic warming on microbes and methane in different land types in Svalbard. Water 13, 3296 (2021).
Hop, H. et al. The marine ecosystem of Kongsfjorden, Svalbard. Polar Res. 21, 167–208 (2002).
Koziorowska, K., Kuliński, K. & Pempkowiak, J. Comparison of the burial rate estimation methods of organic and inorganic carbon and quantification of carbon burial in two high Arctic fjords. Oceanologia 60, 405–418 (2018).
Winkelmann, D. & Knies, J. Recent distribution and accumulation of organic carbon on the continental margin west off Spitsbergen. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 6, Q09012 (2005).
Knies, J. & Martinez, P. Organic matter sedimentation in the western Barents Sea region: Terrestrial and marine contribution based on isotopic composition and organic nitrogen content. Norweg. J. Geol. 89, 79–89 (2009).
Kumar, V. et al. Evidence of anomalously low δ13C of marine organic matter in an Arctic fjord. Sci. Rep. 6, 1–9 (2016).
Koziorowska, K., Kuliński, K. & Pempkowiak, J. Sedimentary organic matter in two Spitsbergen fjords: Terrestrial and marine contributions based on carbon and nitrogen contents and stable isotopes composition. Cont. Shelf Res. 113, 38–46 (2016).
Kim, H. et al. Input of terrestrial organic matter linked to deglaciation increased mercury transport to the Svalbard fjords. Sci. Rep. 10, 3446 (2020).
Kusch, S. et al. Permafrost organic carbon turnover and export into a high-arctic fjord: A case study from Svalbard using compound-specific 14C Analysis. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 126, e2020JG006008 (2021).
Ruben, M. et al. Fossil organic carbon utilization in marine Arctic fjord sediments by subsurface micro-organisms. Nat. Geosci. 1, 1–6 (2023).
Kusch, S. et al. Controls on the age of plant waxes in marine sediments—A global synthesis. Org. Geochem. 157, 104259 (2021).
Jang, K. et al. Neodymium isotope constraints on chemical weathering and past glacial activity in Svalbard. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 542, 116319 (2020).
Knies, J., Brookes, S. & Schubert, C. J. Re-assessing the nitrogen signal in continental margin sediments: New insights from the high northern latitudes. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 253, 471–484 (2007).
Kim, J.-H. et al. Large ancient organic matter contributions to Arctic marine sediments (Svalbard). Limnol. Oceanogr. 56, 1463–1474 (2011).
Dowdeswell, J. A., Elverhøi, A. & Spielhagen, R. Glaciomarine sedimentary processes on the polar north Atlantic margins. Quatern. Sci. Rev. 17, 243–272 (1998).
Zaborska, A. et al. Some sediment characteristics and sedimentation rates in an Arctic Fjord (Kongsfjorden, Svalbard). Rocznik Ochrona Srodowiska 8, 79–96 (2006).
Schubert, C. J. & Calvert, S. E. Nitrogen and carbon isotopic composition of marine and terrestrial organic matter in Arctic Ocean sediments: Implications for nutrient utilization and organic matter composition. Deep-Sea Res. I(48), 789–810 (2001).
Fry, B. & Sherr, E. B. δ13C measurements as indicators of carbon flow in marine and freshwater ecosystems. Contrib. Mar. Sci. 27, 13–47 (1984).
Goñi, M. A. & Eglinton, T. I. Stable carbon isotopic analyses of lignin-derived CuO oxidation products by isotope ratio monitoring-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (irm-GC-MS). Org. Geochem. 24, 601–615 (1996).
Ruttenberg, K. C. & Goni, M. A. Phosphorus distribution, C:N:P ratios, and δ13Coc in Arctic, temperate, and tropical coastal sediments: Tools for characterizing bulk sedimentary organic matter. Mar. Geol. 139, 123–145 (1997).
Frank, M. et al. Radiogenic isotopes: Tracers of past ocean circulation and erosional input. Rev. Geophys. 40, 1–38 (2002).
Dallmann, W. & Elvevold, S. Bedrock Geology. Geoscience Atlas of Svalbard. Report Series 148, Norsk Polarinstitutt, pp. 133–173 (2015).
Broecker, W. S. et al. Natural radiocarbon in the Atlantic Ocean. J. Geophys. Res. 65, 2903–2931 (1960).
Graven, H., Keeling, R. F. & Rogelj, J. Changes to carbon isotopes in atmospheric CO2 over the industrial era and into the future. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 34, e2019GB006170 (2020).
Levin, I. et al. Radiocarbon in global tropospheric carbon dioxide. Radiocarbon 64, 781–791 (2022).
Peterse, F. et al. Constraints on the application of the MBC/CBT palaeothermometer at high latitude environments (Svalbard, Norway). Org. Geochem. 40, 692–699 (2009).
Galy, V. et al. Recycling of graphite during Himalayan erosion: A geological stabilization of carbon in the crust. Science 322, 943–945 (2008).
Kim, D. et al. Changes in the burial efficiency and composition of terrestrial organic carbon along the Mackenzie Trough in the Beaufort Sea. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 275, 107997 (2022).
Blaszczyk, M. et al. Fluctuations of tidewater glaciers in Hornsund Fjord (Southern Svalbard) since the beginning of the 20th century. Polar Res. 34, 327–352 (2013).
Goñi, M. A. et al. The supply and preservation of ancient and modern components of organic carbon in the Canadian Beaufort Shelf of the Arctic Ocean. Mar. Chem. 93, 53–73 (2005).
Hedges, J. I. & Mann, D. C. The characterization of plant tissues by their lignin oxidation products. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 43, 1803–1807 (1979).
Goñi, M. A. & Hedges, J. I. Sources and reactivities of marine-derived organic matter in coastal sediments as determined by alkaline CuO oxidation. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 59, 2965–2981 (1995).
Prahl, F. G. et al. Terrestrial organic carbon contributions to sediments on the Washington margin. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 58, 3035–3048 (1994).
Houel, S. et al. Translocation of soil organic matter following reservoir impoundment in boreal systems: Implications for in situ productivity. Limnol. Oceanogr. 51, 1497–1513 (2006).
Ertel, J. R. & Hedges, J. I. Sources of sedimentary humic substances: Vascular plant debris. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 49, 2097–2107 (1985).
Hedges, J. I. et al. Effects of fungal degradation on the CuO oxidation products of lignin: A controlled laboratory study. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 52, 2717–2726 (1988).
Opsahl, S. & Benner, R. Early diagenesis of vascular plant tissues: Lignin and cutin decomposition and biogeochemical implications. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 59, 4889–4904 (1995).
Zeng, N. Glacial-interglacial atmospheric CO2 change—The glacial burial hypothesis. Adv. Atmos. Sci. 20, 677–693 (2003).
Wadham, J. L. et al. Ice sheets matter for the global carbon cycle. Nat. Commun. 10, 3567 (2019).
Vinsova, P. et al. The biogeochemical legacy of Arctic subglacial sediments exposed by glacier retreat. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 36, e2021GB007126 (2021).
Vonk, J. E. et al. Activation of old carbon by erosion of coastal and subsea permafrost in Arctic Siberia. Nature 489, 137–140 (2012).
Jong, D. et al. Contrasts in dissolved, particulate, and sedimentary organic carbon from the Kolyma River to the East Siberian Shelf. Biogeosciences 20, 271–294 (2023).
Berg, S. et al. Increased petrogenic and biospheric organic carbon burial in sub-Antarctic fjord sediments in response to recent glacier retreat. Limnol. Oceanogr. 9999, 1–16 (2021).
Galy, V. et al. Efficient organic carbon burial in the Bengal fan sustained by the Himalayan erosional system. Nature 450, 407–411 (2007).
Galy, V., Peucker-Ehrenbrink, B. & Eglinton, T. Global carbon export from the terrestrial biosphere controlled by erosion. Nature 521, 204–208 (2015).
Nuth, C. et al. Decadal changes from a multi-temporal glacier inventory of Svalbard. Cryosphere 7, 1603–1621 (2013).
Moskalik, M. et al. Spatiotemporal changes in the concentration and composition of suspended particulate matter in front of Hansbreen, a tidewater glacier in Svalbard. Oceanologia 60, 446–463 (2018).
Wei, B. et al. The nature, timescale, and efficiency of riverine export of terrestrial organic carbon in the (sub)tropics: Insights at the molecular level from the Pearl River and adjacent sea. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 565, 116934 (2021).
Meire, L. et al. Glacier retreat alters downstream fjord ecosystem structure and function in Greenland. Nat. Geosci. 16, 671–674 (2023).
Kim, Y. J. et al. Chronological changes in soil biogeochemical properties of the glacier foreland of Midtre Lovenbreen, Svalbard, attributed to soil-forming factors. Geoderma 415, 115777 (2022).
Jung, J. Y. et al. Soil organic carbon characteristics relating to geomorphology near Vestre Lovenbreen moraine in Svalbard. Ecol. Environ. 37, 69–79 (2014).
Folk, R. L. & Ward, W. C. Brazos River Bar: A study in the significance of grain size parameters. J. Sediment. Petrol. 27, 3–26 (1957).
Stuiver, M. & Polach, H. A. Discussion: Reporting of 14C data. Radiocarbon 19, 355–363 (1977).
Yunker, M. B. et al. Tracing the inputs and fate of marine and terrigenous organic matter in Arctic Ocean sediments: A multivariate analysis of lipid biomarkers. Deep Sea Res. Part II Top. Stud. Oceanogr. 52, 3478–3508 (2005).
Jakobsson, M. et al. The international bathymetric chart of the Arctic Ocean Version 4.0. Sci. Data 7, 176 (2020).
Goñi, M. A., Yunker, M. B., Macdonald, R. W. & Eglinton, T. I. Distribution and sources of organic biomarkers in arctic sediments from the Mackenzie River and Beaufort Shelf. Mar. Chem. 71, 23–51 (2000).
Acknowledgements
We are extremely grateful to Stephanie Kusch and one anonymous reviewer whose valuable comments and suggestions greatly contributed to the improvement of our manuscript. Our heartfelt appreciation goes to the captain and crew of R/V Helmer Hanssen for their invaluable support during our research expeditions at sea. We would also like to acknowledge the invaluable assistance of Yeong-Ju Son and Young Jin Joe in sample preparation and analytical work at the KOPRI laboratory, as well as Juhee Lee, Jihyun Cha, and Seongjin Hong in conducting coal sampling. We would also like to express our gratitude to Ingeborg Levin and Samuel Hammer for making available the Δ14C-CO2 data from the Alert station at the ICOS-ERIC Carbon Portal. This study was supported by a National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT (NRF-2021M1A5A1075512 and KOPRI-PN23013).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
D.K. and J.-H.K. designed and coordinated the study and wrote the manuscript. D.K. and J.-H.K. interpreted the majority of the data. S.-I.N. and J.J. contributed to the sample acquisition. D.K. and M.B. conducted the biomarker analyses. Y.A. and K.J. analyzed the Nd isotopes. All authors commented on the manuscript and contributed to its writing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Kim, D., Kim, JH., Ahn, Y. et al. Large contributions of petrogenic and aged soil-derived organic carbon to Arctic fjord sediments in Svalbard. Sci Rep 13, 17935 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-45141-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-45141-z
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.