Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has sickened millions, cost lives and has devastated the global economy. Various animal models for experimental infection with SARS-CoV-2 have played a key role in many aspects of COVID-19 research. Here, we describe a humanized hACE2 (adenovirus expressing hACE2) NOD-SCID IL2Rγ−/− (NIKO) mouse model and compare infection with ancestral and mutant (SARS-CoV-2-∆382) strains of SARS-CoV-2. Immune cell infiltration, inflammation, lung damage and pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines was observed in humanized hACE2 NIKO mice. Humanized hACE2 NIKO mice infected with the ancestral and mutant SARS-CoV-2 strain had lung inflammation and production of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines. This model can aid in examining the pathological basis of SARS-CoV-2 infection in a human immune environment and evaluation of therapeutic interventions.
An outbreak of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was first identified in December 2019 in Wuhan, China1. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was declared a pandemic on March 11, 2020 and to date, there have been over 765 million cases and 6.9 million deaths attributed to the virus2.
As SARS-CoV-2 is constantly mutating, quick adaptation and effective treatments are needed3,4. To understand disease pathogenesis and assess therapeutics, animal models are required5,6,7,8. Angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 (ACE2) is used by SARS-CoV-2 as a cellular receptor to enter target cells9. SARS-CoV-2 is able to effectively enter human cells via human ACE2 (hACE2), but is unable to infect mice via mouse ACE2 (mACE2)10,11,12. In addition, human immune cells are essential for modulating responses to SARS-CoV-2 and the lack of an observable response in mice is a major hurdle in the analysis of disease pathogenesis and therapeutic invention13,14,15.
Multiple methods to create COVID-19 mouse models have been utilized, including modification of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein5, sequentially passaging SARS-CoV-2 in mouse lung tissue16,17,18, creating transgenic mice where hACE2 is under the control of a tissue-specific promoter such as K18 or cytomegalovirus (CMV)19,20,21,22,23, substituting mACE2 with hACE224,25 and transduction of adenovirus (AdV) or adeno-associated virus expressing hACE2 into the respiratory tract of mice20,26. These models can support viral replication, but the human immune system remains absent.
It is observed that there is a myriad of disease manifestation among SARS-CoV-2 infected patients27. The use of humanized mice with variations in immune responses can represent diverse cohorts of people. Therefore, to generate a mouse model with a human immune system that supports SARS-CoV-2 replication, we created an AdV expressing hACE2 and packaged the construct into plasmids using helper RNAs encoding capsid and envelope proteins to produce hACE2. Adenovirus infects both replicating and non-replicating cells, can be utilized to deliver large transgenes, encode for proteins without integrating into the host genome and is an efficient vector for gene delivery28.
A humanized mouse model susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 infection was created through exogenous delivery of hACE2 with AdV. Humanized hACE2 (adenovirus expressing hACE2) NIKO mice were infected with either an ancestral SARS-CoV-2 (referred to as WT herein) or the variant SARS-CoV-2-∆382 (referred to as Δ382 herein) to analyze the effect of an ORF8 deletion in mice with a human immune system4,29.
Results
Generation and characterization of humanized hACE2 NIKO mice
Humanized mice were created by engrafting CD34+ stem cells into humanized hACE2 NIKO mice. Twelve-weeks post-transplantation, blood samples were collected and analyzed for human reconstitution by flow cytometry (FACS). Additional control mice were sacrificed, and human immune cell reconstitution was evaluated. Human immune populations were present in the blood, spleen, and lung of humanized mice at variable levels (Fig. 1A).
Helper RNA encoding capsid and envelope proteins were used to package AdV expressing hACE2 into plasmids to generate hACE2 AdV. After intratracheally inoculating mice with hACE2 AdV, the presence of hACE2 expression was confirmed in lung cells transduced with hACE2 AdV by qPCR (Fig. 1B) and immunohistochemistry (Fig. 1C). Immunohistochemistry confirmed hACE2 expression in mouse lung tissue (Fig. 1D).
As humanized mice were reconstituted with human immune cells, we further characterized if immune cells express ACE2 receptor. Lung and spleen immune cells from humanized and BALB/c mice were enriched and directly stained with hACE2, hCD45 and DAPI. Our data confirmed that the some of CD45+ human immune cells express ACE2 receptors (Fig. 2A). To understand the in vivo distribution of hACE2 in hACE2 AdV transduced humanized mice, lung sections from hACE2 humanized mice and control humanized mice were stained with hACE2, hCD45 and DAPI. It was shown that hACE2 was expressed mainly in the lung stromal cells of humanized mouse transduced with hACE2 AdV (Fig. 2B), while the contribution of hACE2+hCD45+ cells is minimal.
Humanized hACE NIKO mice support SARS-CoV-2 infection
To create optimal humanized mice, 84 days is needed for human immune cells to expand and reconstitute immunodeficient mice. At 84 days old, mice were intratracheally administered with hACE2 AdV and used for experiments 3 days after inoculation. Therefore, NIKO pups were injected with CD34+ stem cells 87 days prior (Day -87) to the start of the experiment. Day 0 indicates the start of the experiment where humanized hACE2 NIKO mice were infected with either WT or Δ382 virus. At 84 days before (Day -84) the start of the experiment, humanized hACE2 NIKO mice were intratracheally administered with hACE2 AdV. At the start of the experiment at Day 0, humanized hACE2 NIKO mice were infected with either WT or Δ382 virus and groups of mice were sacrificed at 3, 5 and 7 dpi (Fig. 3A). There was no significant weight loss for the duration of infection and no difference between groups (Fig. 3B). Viral replication in the lungs peaked at 3 dpi in mice infected with WT and Δ382 (Fig. 3C). Virus infection in the lung was confirmed by histology. Viral antigen was present in lung sections in humanized mice transduced with hACE2 AdV (Fig. 4A).
Immune cells infiltrated the lungs of infected humanized mice
To characterize human immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 infection in humanized mice, histology from day 3, 5 and 7 were stained. Day 7 where peak responses were observed was used to identify cell types by staining for hCD45 and CD3+ T cells (Fig. 4A). Analysis of lungs sections from humanized hACE2 NIKO mice sacrificed at day 7 and stained with H&E revealed infiltration of immune cells and lung damage. Lung sections of humanized hACE2 NIKO mice infected with WT or Δ382 virus had hCD45+ cells in the lungs. The presence of hCD45+ leukocytes suggest that infection was mediated by human immune cells. We further demonstrated the infection of both strains induced human CD3+ T cell infiltration in the lung. In addition, staining intensity in humanized hACE2 NIKO mice infected with WT and ∆382 virus as observed in histological stains of viral antigen (spike protein), human cell infiltration, human CD45+ lymphocytes and CD3+ T cells showed that humanized hACE2 NIKO mice can support WT and Δ382 infection (Fig. 4B).
Infected humanized mice exhibit inflammatory responses
Cytokine storm and release is known to be responsible for severe syndrome in patients. The presence of human immune system in humanized mice is essential for production of human cytokines and chemokines in WT or ∆382 infection. To determine if humanized hACE2 NIKO mice were able to recapitulate clinical observations, sera from mice were analyzed using a LEGENDplex™ panel. Human pro-inflammatory cytokines, immunosuppressive cytokine and chemokines such as IL-1β (WT and ∆382 mice on 3, 5 and 7 dpi), IFN-α2 (WT mice on 5 and 7 dpi), IFN-γ (WT mice on 5 dpi), TNF-α (∆382 mice on 7 dpi), IL-6 (WT mice on 3, 5 and 7 dpi), IL-8 (CXCL8) (WT mice on 3, 5 and 7 dpi), IL-10 (WT and ∆382 mice on 5 and 7 dpi), IL-10 (WT and ∆382 mice on 5 and 7 dpi), IL-12p70 (WT and ∆382 mice on 5 and 7 dpi), IL-17A (WT mice on 3, 5 and 7 dpi, ∆382 mice on 3 dpi), IL-18 (WT mice on 3 and 7 dpi), IL-23 (WT and ∆382 mice on 5 and 7 dpi) and IL-33 (WT mice on 5 dpi, ∆382 mice on 7 dpi) were produced in varying amounts and timepoints, albeit in lower concentrations as compared to reported patient values (Fig. 5)4,30,31.
Discussion
To overcome infectious disease outbreaks, accurate testing platforms that can be deployed quickly are needed to understand disease pathogenesis and screen therapeutics rapidly. Specificity of non-human animal models used to evaluate disease pathogenesis and test therapeutics are variable and may underestimate therapeutic interaction with human immune cells32,33. To design and test therapeutics safely, a simple and accessible animal model with human immune cells is needed.
Humanized mouse models produced in our laboratory have previously been utilized to study a myriad of infectious diseases, such as dengue fever and hepatitis. Humanized mouse infected with Dengue virus (DENV) developed viremia, rash, fever, thrombocytopenia, released anti-DENV IgM, IgG and produced cytokines similar to patients34. When infected with hepatitis B or C virus, humanized mouse developed inflammation of the liver, leukocyte infiltration, fibrosis, cirrhosis with increased levels of cytokines, similar to human infections35,36. By responding to infection, generating inflammation, and developing pathological changes, these models greatly assisted the understanding of human immune responses to infectious diseases.
In this work, we established a humanized hACE2 NIKO mouse model which contains both human immune cells and the hACE2 receptor to potentially evaluate disease pathogenesis, human immune responses, and outcomes to therapeutics. We prove that although human immune cells naturally express certain levels of hACE2, they are not sufficient to support large extent of viral replications in vivo in humanized mice. Hence, an introduction of hACE2 AdV to humanized mouse models is essential and greatly improves virus infection and replication. Even though there was no significant weight loss during infection, viral replication peaked at 3 dpi in mice infected with WT or Δ382. In addition, viral antigen can be detected in lung sections of humanized mice transduced with hACE2 AdV.
Most importantly, this novel model allows us to examine human immune responses and pathological changes to various strains of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Humanized hACE2 NIKO mice infected with SARS-CoV-2 developed pathological damage in the lungs which includes inflammatory cell infiltration and tissue injury, while humanized hACE2 NIKO mice without human immune system reconstitution only supported infection with no inflammation and pathological changes. Corresponding to inflammation and immune cell infiltration in lung, human cytokines and chemokines such as IL-1β, IFN-α2, IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-6, IL-8 (CXCL8), IL-10, IL-12p70, IL-17A, IL-18, IL-23 and IL-33 were found in systemic circulation in infected mice in varying amounts and timepoints, although in lower concentrations as compared to reported patient values.
These results confirm the importance of human immune responses in SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis, which opens a window for the study of mechanisms and evaluation of therapeutics against inflammation during infection and post-infection. Human immune cells may also express ACE2 receptors, making them a target for SARS-CoV-2, which may result in cell activation and production of more human pro-inflammatory cytokines14,37,38,39,40.
We noticed that although human immune responses were detected in humanized mice, the extent of pathological changes and levels of human cytokines produced were not as robust as observed in patient cohorts. Therefore, the current setting of humanized mice requires optimization. For example, myeloid cells are the main source of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-6, as observed in COVID-19 patients. However, levels of myeloid cells are relatively low in humanized mice (∼5–8% in blood) compared to human (∼40–70%), hence the amount of cytokine and chemokine production may be disproportioned to levels observed in patients.
It has been shown that the development and function of specific human immune cell types such as human natural killer (NK) cells and myeloid cells are less optimal in this humanized mouse system41,42. To further improve SARS-CoV-2 responses, particularly the levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines and lung pathological changes, the humanized hACE2 NIKO mouse model can be optimized by boosting mice with a cocktail of human-specific growth factors/cytokines such as IL-3, IL-7, IL-15, M-CSF and GM-CSF, which have been successfully used in other disease models43,44,45,46. These growth factors will not only support critical immune subsets but also activate human-specific responses toward pathogens.
Further, considering the deficiency of IL2Rγ in mouse immune cells, it has been shown that the residual mouse immune system has impaired function47. However, we still cannot exclude the participation of mouse immune cells during COVID-19 infection in this model. This will be studied in our improved model. To add on, with improved humanized mice, we may be able to study a range of factors including accessory proteins. Understanding the functions of these accessory proteins may provide key insights into the mechanisms underlying SARS-CoV-2 infection and aid in the development of effective therapeutics and vaccines48,49.
In summary, our current study demonstrates the utility of humanized mice in conjunction of virus receptor expression. By manipulating the receptor humanized mice expresses for specific pathogens, humanized mice can be a powerful tool for rapid establishment of animal models to study human immune responses and pathogenesis of new pathogens. For example, humanized mice can be engineered to express dipeptidyl-peptidase 4 (DPP4) for studying MERS-CoV50.
Conclusion
In conclusion, immune cells infiltration, inflammation, lung damage and pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines was observed in humanized hACE2 NIKO mice infected with WT and ∆382. This model can aid in examining the pathological basis of SARS-CoV-2 infection in a human immune environment and evaluation of therapeutic interventions.
Our study demonstrates the utility of humanized mice in conjunction of virus receptor expression. By manipulating the receptor humanized mice expresses for specific pathogens, humanized mice can be a powerful tool for rapid establishment of animal models to study human immune responses and pathogenesis of new pathogens. For example, humanized mice can be engineered to express dipeptidyl-peptidase 4 (DPP4) for studying MERS-CoV. A simple and accessible animal model with human immune cells is needed to design and test therapeutics safely. By responding to infection, generating inflammation, and developing pathological changes, these models can greatly assist the understanding of human immune responses to infectious diseases.
Methods
Human cord blood samples
Human cord blood (CB) samples were obtained from healthy males and females aged 16–23 weeks through STEMCELL Technologies with informed and written consent. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) at Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR). Experimental procedures were conducted in accordance with IRB approval (CIRB Ref: 2012/064/B). All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations. The purity of the CD34+ cells was 90–99% as determined by flow cytometry. Two cord blood samples were used for this study. Experimental mice were chosen randomly, regardless of sex and reconstitution level.
Mice
NOD-SCID IL2Rγ−/− (NIKO) mice were generated and bred in the animal facility at A*STAR, Biological Resource Centre (BRC). Neonate mice were sub-lethally irradiated (100 rads) within 72 h of birth and infused with 1 × 105 human CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) via intra-hepatic injection. At 12-weeks post-transplantation, flow cytometry was used to determine human immune cell reconstitution levels in the peripheral blood of mice. BALB/c mice were purchased from InVivos. Male and female mice were used in this study. Mice were bred and housed under specific pathogen free conditions. All animal experimental procedures were conducted in accordance with the guidelines of Agri-Food and Veterinary Authority and the National Advisory Committee for Laboratory Animal Research of Singapore and were approved by the International Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC), A*STAR (BRC #151060).
Control and hACE2 mice
Recombinant replication-deficient E1, E3-deleted type 5 Adeno-X™ Adenoviral System was used (Takara, USA). The cDNA encoding human ACE2 or EGFP was used to prepare recombinant adenovirus expressing hACE2 or EGFP. Adenovirus expressing hACE2 or EGFP was propagated in 293A cells and purified by Caesium chloride (CsCl) discontinuous density gradient centrifugation. Titre of the vectors was in the range of 1.1–2.0 × 1011 pfu/ml as determined by Adeno-X Rapid Titre Kit (Takara, USA).
Cells and viruses
Two SARS-CoV-2 isolates were used in this study: (1) SARS-CoV-2, an ancestral Wuhan strain (hCoV-19/Singapore/2/2020, GISAID accession ID: EPI_ISL_407987); and (2) SARS-CoV-2-∆382, an ancestral Wuhan strain containing a 382-nt deletion (hCoV-19/Singapore/12/2020, GISAID accession ID: EPI_ISL_414378). Both viruses were isolated from COVID-19 patients in Singapore, as reported previously4 and referred to as wild-type (WT) and mutant (∆382), respectively, herein. Virus was propagated using Vero-E6 cells cultured with DMEM supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 100 units/ml penicillin and 100 µg/ml streptomycin (P/S) at 37 °C, 5% CO2. Cell culture supernatants were harvested, centrifuged and aliquoted once cytopathic effect (CPE) was observed. Vero-E6 cells were infected with virus stocks to determine the tissue culture infective dose (TCID50/ml). Vero-E6 cells in 96-well plates were used for titrations. Virus stocks were serially diluted in DMEM supplemented with 5% FBS and P/S. Cells were infected with 100 µL of sample dilution in quadruplicate. Cells were incubated at 37 °C and 5% CO2 for 4 days. Following incubation, wells with CPE were recorded and the cell-free virus titre (TCID50/mL) for each sample were determined by limited dilution.
Infection of mice with WT and ∆382 SARS-CoV-2
Three to five mice were assigned to each group. Mice were infected with 5 × 104 TCID intranasally following sedation with isoflurane. Body weight was monitored on days 3, 5 and 7. Mice were euthanized by CO2 overdose and lungs were taken for titration and stored at − 80 °C until homogenized in 1 ml DMEM-5 and titrated by limiting dilution as described above. Blood was collected from the submandibular vein bleed on the last day of the study. Blood was collected into a tube containing heparin and centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 15 min to obtain plasma.
The experiments were approved by the SingHealth Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the SingHealth Experimental Medicine Centre (SEMC). Infection studies were performed under BSL3 containment in the Duke-NUS Medical School ABSL3 facility.
Cytospin, histology and immunohistochemistry
For cytospin, mononuclear cells (MNCs) were isolated from the lung and spleen by standard procedures. The spleen was pressed through a 70 μm mesh and debris removed by centrifugation at 1500 rpm for 5 min. Supernatant containing MNCs were collected, washed once in PBS, and resuspended in 40% Percoll (MilliporeSigma, USA) diluted in RPMI medium 1640. The cell suspension was carefully overlaid onto 70% Percoll and centrifuged at 2500 rpm for 20 min. Mononuclear cells were collected from the interphase and washed twice in PBS. Lung was minced and added to a medium containing 0.05% collagenase (MilliporeSigma, USA), 0.01% DNase I (MilliporeSigma, USA), and incubated at 37 °C for 20 min. The lung sample was filtered through a 70 μm mesh and MNCs were isolated by Percoll centrifugation as described above. Mononuclear cells from lung and spleen were counted and 104 cells resuspended in 100 μl of 2% FCS—PBS were added to each cytospin cassette and centrifuged at 1000 rpm for 5 min. Cells were cytospun onto Poly-L-Lysine-coated slides, air-dried and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA).
Humanized mouse lungs were collected and fixed in 4% PFA prior to removal from the ABSL3 facility. Lungs were then embedded in paraffin and processed into sections. PFA-fixed paraffin sections (5 μm thickness) were dewaxed by melting for 30 min at 65 °C, rinsed in xylene twice for 5 min, and rehydrated in water–ethanol solutions containing decreasing percentages of ethanol. Lungs from humanized mice not infected with WT or Δ382 virus was collected from euthanized mice and embedded in Tissue-Tek® O.C.T™ compound (Sakura Finetek, USA) and snap-frozen. Cryosections of 5 μm were obtained from frozen liver tissue. To determine tissue morphology, sections were stained with Haematoxylin–eosin (Gill 2 Haematoxylin and Eosin Y alcoholic; Thermo Sandon, UK) following standard procedures. For Immunohistochemistry, mouse lungs were subjected to heat-mediated antigen retrieval with sodium citrate (pH6 or pH9), incubated with anti-human CD3 (pH9; 1:50) (Abcam, UK), CD45 (pH6; 1:50) (Abcam, UK) and SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike antibody (pH6; 1:400) (GeneTex, USA) antigen stained with SuperPicture 3rd Gen IHC Detection Kit (Life Technologies, USA) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Cytospun splenocytes and lung cells were stained with anti-ACE2 (1:100) (Abcam, UK), human CD45 (1:40) (Abcam, UK), Chicken anti-Mouse IgG (H + L) Cross-Adsorbed Secondary Antibody, Alexa Fluor 488 (1:200) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA), Goat anti-Rabbit IgG (H + L) Cross-Adsorbed Secondary Antibody, Alexa Fluor 546 (1:200) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) and cover-slipped with Prolong Gold anti-fade reagent containing DAPI (Invitrogen). Histopathological images were acquired using Axio Scan. Z1 slide scanner (Zeiss, Germany) and analyzed using Zen 2 (blue edition; Zeiss) software. Windows 10 and ImageJ (Version 1.53) was used to quantitate histological images. Briefly, images were converted into 8-bit, backgrounds subtracted, and biologically relevant areas were measured.
Cytokine and chemokine protein quantification
As LEGENDplex™ provides higher sensitivities and a broader dynamic range than traditional ELISA methods, a premixed LEGENDplex™ Human Inflammation Panel (13-plex) (Biolegend, USA) was used to measure plasma cytokine and chemokine levels. The 13 cytokines and chemokines assayed simultaneously include IL-1β, IFN-α, IFN-γ, TNF-α, MCP-1 (CCL2), IL-6, IL-8 (CXCL8), IL-10, IL-12p70, IL-17A, IL-18, IL-23, and IL-33. Immunoassay procedures were performed according to manufacturer’s instructions. Data was acquired using a LSR II flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, USA) with FACSDiva software, and analysis was performed using LEGENDplex™ Data Analysis software (Biolegend, USA) based on standard curves plotted through a five-parameter logistic curve setting.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 5.0 software (GraphPad Software Inc., USA). The correlation strength between the variables was assessed using the Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. Pairwise comparison was performed using two-tailed Mann Whitney U test/ two-way Analysis of variance (ANOVA), p value less than 0.05 is considered statistically significant.
ARRIVE guidelines
This study is reported in accordance with ARRIVE guidelines.
Data availability
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article (and Supplementary Information files).
References
Li, Q. et al. Early transmission dynamics in Wuhan, China, of novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia. N. Engl. J. Med. 382, 1199–1207. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2001316 (2020).
WHO. WHO Coronavirus (COVID-19) Dashboard, 2022).
Badua, C., Baldo, K. A. T. & Medina, P. M. B. Genomic and proteomic mutation landscapes of SARS-CoV-2. J. Med. Virol. 93, 1702–1721. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.26548 (2021).
Su, Y. C. F. et al. Discovery and genomic characterization of a 382-nucleotide deletion in ORF7b and ORF8 during the early evolution of SARS-CoV-2. mbio 11, e01610–e01620. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.01610-20 (2020).
Muñoz-Fontela, C. et al. Animal models for COVID-19. Nature 586, 509–515. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2787-6 (2020).
Sarkar, S. & Heise, M. T. Mouse models as resources for studying infectious diseases. Clin. Ther. 41, 1912–1922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2019.08.010 (2019).
Johansen, M. D. et al. Animal and translational models of SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19. Mucosal. Immunol. 13, 877–891. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41385-020-00340-z (2020).
Pandey, K. et al. Animal models for SARS-CoV-2 research: A comprehensive literature review. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 68, 1868–1885. https://doi.org/10.1111/tbed.13907 (2020).
Gheblawi, M. et al. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2: SARS-CoV-2 receptor and regulator of the renin-angiotensin system: Celebrating the 20th anniversary of the discovery of ACE2. Circ. Res. 126, 1456–1474. https://doi.org/10.1161/circresaha.120.317015 (2020).
Li, W. et al. Efficient replication of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus in mouse cells is limited by murine angiotensin-converting enzyme 2. J. Virol. 78, 11429–11433. https://doi.org/10.1128/jvi.78.20.11429-11433.2004 (2004).
Wang, Q. et al. Structural and functional basis of SARS-CoV-2 entry by using human ACE2. Cell 181, 894–904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2020.03.045 (2020).
Harker, J. A. & Johansson, C. Rapidly Deployable mouse models of SARS-CoV-2 infection add flexibility to the COVID-19 toolbox. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 64, 7–9. https://doi.org/10.1165/rcmb.2020-0456ED (2020).
Sungnak, W. et al. SARS-CoV-2 entry factors are highly expressed in nasal epithelial cells together with innate immune genes. Nat. Med. 26, 681–687. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-020-0868-6 (2020).
Wang, C., Zhou, X., Wang, M. & Chen, X. The impact of SARS-CoV-2 on the human immune system and microbiome. Infect. Microbes Dis. https://doi.org/10.1097/IM9.0000000000000045 (2021).
Jia, W. et al. The mechanisms and animal models of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 9, 578825. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2021.578825 (2021).
Leist, S. R. et al. A Mouse-adapted SARS-CoV-2 induces acute lung injury and mortality in standard laboratory mice. Cell 183, 1070–1085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2020.09.050 (2020).
Roberts, A. et al. A mouse-adapted SARS-coronavirus causes disease and mortality in BALB/c mice. PLoS Pathogens 3, e5. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.0030005 (2007).
Regla-Nava, J. A. et al. The replication of a mouse adapted SARS-CoV in a mouse cell line stably expressing the murine SARS-CoV receptor mACE2 efficiently induces the expression of proinflammatory cytokines. J. Virol. Methods 193, 639–646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2013.07.039 (2013).
Zheng, J. et al. COVID-19 treatments and pathogenesis including anosmia in K18-hACE2 mice. Nature 589, 603–607. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2943-z (2021).
Rathnasinghe, R. et al. Comparison of transgenic and adenovirus hACE2 mouse models for SARS-CoV-2 infection. bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.06.190066 (2020).
Yinda, C. K. et al. K18-hACE2 mice develop respiratory disease resembling severe COVID-19. PLOS Pathogens 17, e1009195. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1009195 (2021).
Dong, W. et al. The K18-hACE2 transgenic mouse model recapitulates non-severe and severe COVID-19 in response to infectious dose of SARS-CoV-2 virus. bioRxiv 5, 443244. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.08.443244 (2021).
McCray, P. B. Jr. et al. Lethal infection of K18-hACE2 mice infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus. J. Virol. 81, 813–821. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.02012-06 (2007).
Sun, S. H. et al. A mouse model of SARS-CoV-2 infection and pathogenesis. Cell Host Microbe 28, 124-133.e124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2020.05.020 (2020).
Jia, H., Yue, X. & Lazartigues, E. ACE2 mouse models: A toolbox for cardiovascular and pulmonary research. Nat. Commun. 11, 5165. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-18880-0 (2020).
Israelow, B. et al. Mouse model of SARS-CoV-2 reveals inflammatory role of type I interferon signaling. J. Exp. Med. 217, e20201241. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20201241 (2020).
Li, K. et al. Differing susceptibility of C57BL/6J and DBA/2J mice—Parents of the murine BXD family, to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection. Cell Biosci. 11, 137. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13578-021-00656-8 (2021).
Lee, C. S. et al. Adenovirus-mediated gene delivery: Potential applications for gene and cell-based therapies in the new era of personalized medicine. Genes Dis 4, 43–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gendis.2017.04.001 (2017).
Zinzula, L. Lost in deletion: The enigmatic ORF8 protein of SARS-CoV-2. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 538, 116–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2020.10.045 (2021).
Gamage, A. M. et al. Infection of human Nasal Epithelial Cells with SARS-CoV-2 and a 382-nt deletion isolate lacking ORF8 reveals similar viral kinetics and host transcriptional profiles. PLOS Pathogens 16, e1009130. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1009130 (2020).
Young, B. E. et al. Effects of a major deletion in the SARS-CoV-2 genome on the severity of infection and the inflammatory response: An observational cohort study. Lancet 396, 603–611. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31757-8 (2020).
Jarnagin, K., Alvarez, O., Shresta, S. & Webb, D. R. Animal models for SARS-Cov2/Covid19 research—A commentary. Biochem. Pharmacol. 188, 114543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcp.2021.114543 (2021).
Ehaideb, S. N., Abdullah, M. L., Abuyassin, B. & Bouchama, A. Evidence of a wide gap between COVID-19 in humans and animal models: a systematic review. Crit. Care 24, 594. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-03304-8 (2020).
Sridharan, A. et al. Inhibition of megakaryocyte development in the bone marrow underlies dengue virus-induced thrombocytopenia in humanized mice. J. Virol. 87, 11648–11658. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.01156-13 (2013).
Keng, C. T. et al. Characterisation of liver pathogenesis, human immune responses and drug testing in a humanised mouse model of HCV infection. Gut 65, 1744–1753. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2014-307856 (2016).
Tan-Garcia, A. et al. Intrahepatic CD206(+) macrophages contribute to inflammation in advanced viral-related liver disease. J. Hepatol. 67, 490–500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2017.04.023 (2017).
Zhang, J. et al. Pyroptotic macrophages stimulate the SARS-CoV-2-associated cytokine storm. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 18, 1305–1307. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41423-021-00665-0 (2021).
Abassi, Z., Knaney, Y., Karram, T. & Heyman, S. N. The lung macrophage in SARS-CoV-2 infection: A friend or a foe?. Front. Immunol. 11, 1312. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.01312 (2020).
Grant, R. A. et al. Circuits between infected macrophages and T cells in SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia. Nature 590, 635–641. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-03148-w (2021).
Boumaza, A. et al. Monocytes and macrophages, targets of severe acute respiratory syndrome Coronavirus 2: The clue for Coronavirus Disease 2019 immunoparalysis. J. Infect. Dis. 224, 395–406. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiab044 (2021).
Chen, Q., Khoury, M. & Chen, J. Expression of human cytokines dramatically improves reconstitution of specific human-blood lineage cells in humanized mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 106, 21783. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0912274106 (2009).
Shultz, L. D., Brehm, M. A., Garcia-Martinez, J. V. & Greiner, D. L. Humanized mice for immune system investigation: Progress, promise and challenges. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 12, 786–798. https://doi.org/10.1038/nri3311 (2012).
Chen, Q. et al. Human natural killer cells control Plasmodium falciparum infection by eliminating infected red blood cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 111, 1479–1484. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1323318111 (2014).
Mencarelli, A. et al. A humanized mouse model to study mast cells mediated cutaneous adverse drug reactions. J. Leukoc. Biol. 107, 797–807. https://doi.org/10.1002/JLB.3MA1219-210RR (2020).
Costa Vivian, V. et al. Dengue virus-infected dendritic cells, but not monocytes, activate natural killer cells through a contact-dependent mechanism involving adhesion molecules. mbio 8, e00741-00717. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00741-17 (2017).
Ye, W. et al. Microvesicles from malaria-infected red blood cells activate natural killer cells via MDA5 pathway. PLOS Pathogens 14, e1007298. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1007298 (2018).
Yong, K. S. M., Her, Z. & Chen, Q. Humanized mice as unique tools for human-specific studies. Arch. Immunol. Ther. Exp. 66, 245–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00005-018-0506-x (2018).
Zandi, M. ORF9c and ORF10 as accessory proteins of SARS-CoV-2 in immune evasion. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 22, 331–331. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41577-022-00715-2 (2022).
Wong, L.-Y.R. & Perlman, S. Immune dysregulation and immunopathology induced by SARS-CoV-2 and related coronaviruses —Are we our own worst enemy?. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 22, 47–56. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41577-021-00656-2 (2022).
Zhao, J. et al. Rapid generation of a mouse model for Middle East respiratory syndrome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 111, 4970–4975. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1323279111 (2014).
Acknowledgements
This project was funded by National Medical Research Council, Singapore COVID19RF2-0001 to DEA, QC and L-FW, and by the National Research Foundation Singapore Fellowship (NRF-NRFF2017-03) to QC. We thank Randy Foo for assistance with ABSL3 mouse studies and Dr. Ravisankar Rajarethinam from Histopathology Facility/Advanced Molecular Pathology Lab (AMPL) at Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), for offering consultation and support.
Funding
This project was funded by National Medical Research Council, Singapore COVID19RF2-0001 to DEA, QC and L-FW, and by the National Research Foundation Singapore Fellowship (NRF-NRFF2017-03) to QC.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
K.S.M.Y., D.E.A., Q.C. and L.-F.W. conceived and designed the study. K.S.M.Y., D.E.A., A.K.E.Z., M.L., S.Y.T. and W.W.S.T. performed experiments. K.S.M.Y., D.E.A., Q.C. and L.-F.W. prepared the manuscript with input from all authors.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Yong, K.S.M., Anderson, D.E., Zheng, A.K.E. et al. Comparison of infection and human immune responses of two SARS-CoV-2 strains in a humanized hACE2 NIKO mouse model. Sci Rep 13, 12484 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-39628-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-39628-y
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.