Organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs) can deliver highly efficient emission from thin-film (and flexible) device structures by virtue of a rational design of their constituent p–n junction doping structure1. This device design involves the careful inclusion of a multitude of different layers, some of which are chemically doped, during device fabrication, which enables for the localization of the emissive p–n junction at a point of constructive interference and for the suppression of exciton losses due to lowered quenching interactions with the electrodes, other excitons, and the dopants2,3,4.

The light-emitting electrochemical (LEC) is an alternative thin-film (and flexible) light-emission technology that is similar in appearance to the OLED, but which is distinguished by its much simpler device architecture that enables for cost-efficient ambient-air printing5,6 and coating7,8 fabrication. The LEC commonly comprises a single-layer active material sandwiched between two air-stabile electrodes9,10,11,12,13, and during operation the LEC-defining mobile ions in the active material redistribute for the formation of a p–n junction doping structure by electrochemical doping.14,15,16,17.

This characteristic in-situ electrochemical doping mode of LECs has the drawback that it has rendered the rational control of the p–n junction position in the interelectrode gap for high emission performance difficult. In this context, we call attention to that direct visual observations of open planar LEC devices with extremely large interelectrode gaps18,19,20 and angle-resolved electroluminescence (EL) measurements and simulations of thin-film LECs21,22 have showed that the selection of the mobile ions23,24, the ion transporter25, and the emissive organic semiconductor26 can have a profound influence on the position of the p–n junction. Recently, these experimental findings were rationalized by theoretical investigations that established that the initial position of the p–n junction in the interelectrode gap is determined by the anion/cation mobility ratio, while its steady-state position is decided by the electron/hole mobility ratio25,27. However, it is notable that these important measurement results and conceptual insights were invariably derived on LEC devices, which comprised a pristine and undoped organic semiconductor as the emissive and electrochemically active species.

In the present study, we demonstrate that a rational and controlled shift of the position of the emissive p–n junction in LEC devices can be attained by a new concept, viz. “chemical pre-doping” of the organic semiconductor already during the LEC fabrication. We specifically show that the addition of a soluble strong chemical reductant, in the form of the neutral organic molecule termed reduced benzyl viologen (r-BV0), to the active-material ink results in an electron transfer and an associated filling of deep electron traps of a common emissive organic semiconductor termed Super Yellow. By combined experimentation and simulation, we further show that this chemical pre-doping approach enables for a significant and rational spatial shift of the emissive p–n junction, that the magnitude of this shift can be controlled by the concentration of the chemical dopant, and that this addition can enable for an improved device performance in the form of an increased emission efficiency and stability.

Results and discussion

Viologens are organic bipyridinium compounds that are widely studied and utilized for their electron-donating28,29,30, electrochromic31, and catalytic32, properties; in addition, their high solubility in common solvents render them compatible with cost-efficient printing and coating fabrication28,33. One member of the bipyridinium class is the neutral reduced benzyl viologen (r-BV0) molecule, which comprises a central 4,4′ − bipyridine core surrounded by two benzyl groups (see Figs. 1a,b). r-BV0 is a notably strong electron donor, i.e. chemical reductant30, which has been employed for the n-type doping of a wide variety of semiconductors, including conjugated polymers, carbon nanostructures, graphene, MoS2 and PbS29,30,34,35,36,37,38,39.

Figure 1
figure 1

(a) The reaction scheme for the synthesis of the chemical reductant r-BV0. (b) The three different oxidation states of benzyl viologen, BV, with their corresponding color identified in the parenthesis. (c) The electron-energy diagram shows the HOMO of r-BV0 to the left, and the LUMO, the electron-trap level and the HOMO of the emissive organic semiconductor Super Yellow to the right. The arrow indicates an electron transfer from the HOMO of r-BV0 to the electron-trap level of Super Yellow.

We herein synthesized r-BV0 by reducing a benzyl viologen dichloride salt (BV2+Cl-2) with the aid of a large surplus of a NaBH4 salt as the reducing agent35,36,37,38,39 in a two-component water:toluene solution, as schematically depicted in Fig. 1a. The exothermic reaction proceeds in two reduction steps, with the initial step featuring an electron transfer from NaBH4 to the nitrogen on one of the two pyridine rings of the BV2+ di-cation for the formation of a r-BV+ mono-cation; while the final step constitutes an electron transfer from NaBH4 to the nitrogen on the second of the pyridine rings for the formation of the desired neutral r-BV0 end product. The chemical structures of these three different oxidation states of the benzyl viologen (BV) molecule, and their associated colors, are displayed in Fig. 1b.

The progression of this chemical reaction can be observed visually, since the two reactants (BV2+Cl-2, and NaBH4) are colorless, while the r-BV+ intermediate is colored violet, and the final r-BV0 product is pale yellow29,35,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45. The conclusion of the reaction can accordingly be determined by the reaction solution shifting color from violet to yellow (see Fig. S1), in combination with the disappearance of the H2 gas bubbles from the reaction solution (see Fig. 1a). The completion of this double-reduction reduction was further confirmed by the recording of a silent EPR spectrum (data not shown). The single-reduction product r-BV+ would in contrast have exhibited a characteristic EPR spectrum46. The employment of the poorly miscible two-component water:toluene reaction solution enabled for the practical collection of the neutral r-BV0 product from the upper (and lighter) toluene phase, since both reactants and all other non-gaseous products are solely soluble in the lower water phase. More details on the synthesis are available in the Methods section.

The extracted “doping solution” (i.e., r-BV0 dissolved in toluene) exhibited a r-BV0 solute concentration of ~ 4 g·l−1. This solution was used as the chemical reductant in the formulation of the ”active-material inks”, which also comprised the electroluminescent and polymeric organic semiconductor termed Super Yellow, the ion transporter hydroxyl-capped trimethylolpropane ethoxylate (TMPE-OH), and the salt KCF3SO3 in a constant mass ratio of 1:0.1:0.03. The r-BV0 concentration was varied in the different inks, as quantified by the mass fraction of r-BV0 with respect to Super Yellow.

Figure 1c is an electron-energy diagram, which presents values for the HOMO of r-BV0 to the left and the LUMO, HOMO and an electron-trap level of Super Yellow47,48,49 to the right. The HOMO value for r-BV0 was derived from a cyclic voltammetry (CV) measurement vs. the standard hydrogen electrode (SHE), and by using the convention that the SHE electrode is offset by 4.44 eV from the vacuum level.30,50,51 The HOMO and LUMO of Super Yellow were similarly determined from CV measurements,52 while a major and generic electron trap level in organic semiconductors was identified and rationalized by Blom et al.47,49 A recent LEC study further suggest that the inclusion of the TMPE-OH ion transporter into the active material of our LEC devices can result in the formation of a significant concentration of additional electron traps25, but their exact energy level is currently unknown. Nevertheless, the presented electron-energy diagram implies that an electron transfer from the HOMO of r-BV0 to the established electron-trap level of Super Yellow should be possible, as indicated by the arrow in Fig. 1c.

The photoluminescence quantum yield (PLQY) is a sensitive indicator of the existence of “trap impurities” in organic semiconductors, since the singlet exciton typically diffuses a significant distance of ~ 10 nm during its lifetime in neat organic semiconductors53, and since the exciton commonly is efficiently quenched by such trap impurities54,55. Figure 2a presents the evolution of the PLQY of the active-material film as a function of the added r-BV0 concentration. Interestingly, we find that the PLQY first increases up to ~ 2 mass% of r-BV0, and thereafter decreases monotonously with further increasing r-BV0 concentration. The initial increase of the PLQY implies that the first added r-BV0 molecules effectively eliminates “dark” electron traps, presumably by donating electrons and thereby filling of electron trap levels, as schematically depicted in Fig. 1c.

Figure 2
figure 2

(a) The PLQY of the (Super Yellow + TMPE-OH + KCF3SO3 + r-BV0) active material as a function of the r-BV0 chemical reductant concentration. The dashed line is a guide to the eye. (b) The current density as a function of the applied voltage for glass/ITO/Al/(Super Yellow + r-BV0)/Ca/Al electron-only devices for different concentrations of the r-BV0 chemical reductant, as specified in the legend. The thickness of the active material is 100 nm.

The influence on the electronic conductivity of Super Yellow by the addition of r-BV0 was investigated by the fabrication and characterization of glass/ITO/Al/(Super Yellow + r-BV0)/Ca/Al electron-only devices. Figure 2b shows that the current density increases by more than one order of magnitude over the entire probed voltage interval when the r-BV0 concentration is increased from 0 to 3 mass%; but that trend is reversed at higher r-BV0 concentrations exceeding 3 mass%, for which the electronic conductivity is reverting back to the lower level of intrinsic Super Yellow.

Accordingly, the summary conclusion from the data presented in Figs. 1c and S1 is that the first addition of r-BV0 molecules (up to 2–3 mass%) results in a filling of electron traps of Super Yellow, which is manifested in an increased electron mobility (and thereby an improved electronic conductivity)56 and an improved PLQY. A higher concentration of added r-BV0 molecules results in transport- and emission-damaging effects that obviously should be avoided in devices. We now turn our attention to the investigation of the effects of this dopant-enabled electron-trap filling approach on the performance of LEC devices.

Figure 3a presents the simulated steady-state exciton profile in the interelectrode gap for ITO/active-material/Al LECs, which are solely distinguished by the non-filled electron-trap concentration on the organic semiconductor in the active material, as identified in the inset. The trap-free electron/hole mobility ratio was set to 3 in the simulation, and the anodic (cathodic) interface is positioned at a normalized interelectrode position of 0 (1). The peak exciton formation rate can be considered to represent the position of the emissive p–n junction.

Figure 3
figure 3

(a) The simulated position of the emissive p–n junction in the interelectrode gap for different values of the electron-trap concentration, as identified in the inset. The positive anode is located at 0 and the negative cathode at 1. The electron-trap concentration is normalized by the total concentration of transport states and expressed as a percentage in the inset. The arrow indicates the simulated anodic shift of the p–n junction with decreasing concentration of electron traps, i.e., an increasing number of chemical-reductant molecules. (b) The measured steady-state position of the emissive p–n junction as a function of the concentration of the r-BV0 chemical reductant. (c, d) The long-term temporal evolution of (c) the voltage and (d) the luminance during electrical driving of ITO/(Super Yellow + TMPE-OH + KCF3SO3 + r-BV0)/Al LECs by a constant current density of 7.75 mA·cm-2. The concentration of the chemical reductant r-BV0 is identified in the inset in (c).

The simulation shows that the position of the p–n junction shifts from the center of the active material towards the positive anode with decreasing concentration of electron traps, i.e., with increasing concentration of chemical-reductant molecules, as highlighted by the arrow. This behavior is explained by that the steady-state position of the p–n junction in LEC devices is determined by the effective electron/hole mobility ratio, with a higher electron (hole) mobility resulting in a p–n junction positioned closer to the positive anode (negative cathode). The filling of electron traps will increase the effective electron mobility, and it is accordingly expected to result in the observed shift of the p–n junction towards the positive anode.

We have experimentally investigated the effects of the addition of the r-BV0 chemical reductant on the p–n junction position by first measuring the angle-dependent EL spectrum and intensity for ITO/(Super Yellow + TMPE-OH + KCF3SO3 + r-BV0)/Al LECs and by thereafter simulating the same data. The sole free parameter in the simulation was the position of the emissive p–n junction, and by systematically determining the value for this parameter that produced the best agreement between the measured and simulated data, we could establish the position of emissive p–n junction with high accuracy25,57,58. A number of visual examples of this best-fit procedure for the identification of the p–n junction position are displayed in Fig. S3, while the Methods section provides more details on its practical execution.

Figure 3b presents the experimentally determined steady-state position of the p–n junction in the interelectrode gap as a function of the r-BV0 concentration. The LEC device void of r-BV0 exhibits a steady-state p–n junction in the exact middle of the active material at 0.50, while the addition of the r-BV0 chemical reductant to the active material results in a gradual and significant anodic shift of the p–n junction position to 0.43 at [r-BV0] = 1 mass% and 0.39 at [r-BV0] = 3 mass%. This experimental finding is thus in excellent agreement with the simulation results displayed in Fig. 3a. At a higher r-BV0 concentration ([r-BV0] ≥ 5 mass%) the anodic shift is halted, which is in line with our earlier finding that these higher r-BV0 concentrations cause transport (and emission) limiting effects.

We have finally investigated the effects of this chemical pre-doping approach, and its induced p–n junction shift, on the performance of LEC devices. Figure 3c,d display the measured voltage and luminance transients, respectively, of representative ITO/(Super Yellow + TMPE-OH + KCF3SO3 + r-BV0)/Al LEC devices during electrical driving by a constant current density of 7.75 mA·cm-2. The r-BV0 concentration is identified in the inset of Fig. 3c. The corresponding shorter-time luminance and current-efficacy transients are displayed in Fig. S4. We have measured eight independent devices for each r-BV0 concentration, and Fig. S2 and Table S1 present the average and standard deviation for key device metrics.

All investigated LEC devices feature a decreasing voltage and an increasing luminance during the initial operation, and a fast turn of < 2 s to a luminance exceeding 100 cd·m−2. This implies that the LEC-characteristic in-situ electrochemical doping capacity of the organic semiconductor Super Yellow is not significantly damaged or affected by the addition of r-BV059. We find that the LEC devices with a r-BV0 concentration of ≤ 3 mass% exhibit a markedly better performance than the LECs with a higher r-BV0 concentration (see also Fig. S2 and Table S1). This supports our earlier finding that a too high r-BV0 concentration causes transport and emission limiting effects within the active material.

Importantly, we find that the LEC with 1 mass% r-BV0 exhibits ~ 10% higher peak luminance and ~ 70% longer operational lifetime than the reference LEC void of r-BV0, as gleaned from the statistical analysis presented in Table S1. (The operational lifetime is here defined as the total time that the device emits with a luminance exceeding 100 cd·m−2). We assign these improvements to the combined effects of a slightly increased PLQY (Fig. 2a), and the associated suppression of weakly emissive trap-assisted electron and hole recombination49, in combination with the anodic shift of the emissive p–n junction following the addition of 1 mass% r-BV0 to the active material (Fig. 3b). An anodic shift of the exciton population can for this particular device be attractive from an emission-efficiency viewpoint since the ITO anode is a less potent exciton quencher than the Al cathode60,61. Accordingly, a shift of the emissive p–n junction from the center of the active material towards the positive ITO anode can be expected to result in lowered losses due to exciton-electrode quenching. We finally note that exciton quenching can result in severe self heating62,63 and/or the formation of highly localized high-energy species on the organic semiconductor, which in turn can cause material and device degradation. Thus, the suppression of exciton quenching reactions by the electron trap filling of the organic semiconductor by the chemical reductant can also rationalize the observed prolongation of the device lifetime.

Conclusions

We report on chemical pre-doping as a novel and functional tool for the rational adjustment of the doping structure and the p–n junction position in LEC devices. Such a tool is much desired, since it is well established that the in situ formed doping structure has a strong influence on the LEC performance. We specifically synthesize a solution-processible r-BV0 chemical reductant with a high HOMO level, which enables for effective electron transfer to a generic electron trap level of organic semiconductors. By a combination of simulations and experiments, we show that the addition of this chemical reductant to the active material of a common LEC device results in a shift of the emissive p–n junction from the center of the active material towards the transparent positive anode, and that such an optimized addition can result in a markedly improved device performance.

Methods

Synthesis of the chemical reductant

The overall reaction scheme for the chemical synthesis of the reduced benzyl viologen (r-BV0) chemical reductant is displayed in Fig. 1a. The reaction is initiated by mixing 20 mg (0.05 mmol) benzyl viologen dichloride salt (BV2+Cl2, C24H22N22+Cl2, MW = 409.35 g·mol−1, 97%, Merck, GER) with 4 g (0.1 mol) NaBH4 salt (MW = 37.83 g·mol−1, powder, ≥ 98.0%, Merck, GER) in 10 ml (0.6 mol) deionized water, followed by the addition of 5 ml (0.05 mol) of toluene. The B2H6 product is quickly reacting with water to form B(OH)3 boric acid and H2 gas, with the latter being observed as gas bubbles escaping the reaction liquid.

At the end of the reaction, the water and toluene solvents are visibly separated, with the lower-density toluene floating on top of the water. Both reactants (i.e. the two salts BV2+Cl-2 and NaBH4) and all non-gaseous products are highly soluble in water but effectively insoluble in toluene28, with the exception being the neutral r-BV0 reaction product that instead is highly soluble in toluene29,35,38,39,40,41. This distinct dissolution capacity enables for the facile collection of r-BV0 at the end of the reaction through the extraction of the lighter toluene phase with a syringe.

Figures 1b and S1 reveal that the progression of the reaction can be visualized through the change in color that accompanies the two-step reduction of the BV molecule. The original BV2+ di-cation reactant is colorless, while the intermediate r-BV+ mono-cation is violet, and the final neutral r-BV0 product is pale yellow in color. We could thus determine the conclusion of the reaction by the time at which the toluene phase had changed color to yellow and when the formation of H2 gas bubbles had ceased. The time for complete reaction was approximately three days. It is notable that the reaction was executed under ambient air at room temperature without the use of a catalyst. The r-BV0 concentration in the extracted 5 ml toluene solution is ~ 4 g·l−1, and from here on we refer to it as the "doping solution".

Ink formulation

The electroluminescent organic semiconductor Super Yellow (PDY-132, Merck, GER) was dissolved in cyclohexanone (purity > 99.5%, Sigma Aldrich, USA) in a concentration of either 8 or 10 g·l−1. The KCF3SO3 (Merck, GER) salt and the hydroxyl-capped trimethylolpropane ethoxylate (TMPE-OH, MW = 450 g·mol−1, Merck, GER) ion transporter were separately dissolved in cyclohexanone in a 10 g·l−1 concentration. KCF3SO3 and TMPE-OH were dried under vacuum at 80 °C for 12 h before dissolution, while the other chemicals were used as received.

The master solutions were stirred on a magnetic hot plate at 70 °C for 1 day, and thereafter blended in a Super Yellow:TMPE-OH:KCF3SO3 mass ratio of 1:0.1:0.03. The doping solution was thereafter added in a number of different concentrations for the formulation of the active-material inks. These inks are solely distinguished by the concentration of r-BV0, which is herein quantified by the mass ratio between r-BV0 and Super Yellow. The inks for the electron-transport measurements were prepared in an identical manner, but with the TMPE-OH and KCF3SO3 master solutions excluded. All of the ink preparation and device fabrication processes were performed in a pair of interconnected N2-filled glove boxes ([O2] < 1 ppm, [H2O] < 1 ppm).

Film and device fabrication and characterization

The thin films for the optical characterization were spin-coated onto carefully cleaned quartz substrates using the inks based on the lower viscosity 8 g·l−1 Super Yellow master solution. The employment of a spin speed of 1700–2000 rpm for 60 s resulted in a ~ 110 nm dry film thickness, as determined by a stylus profilometer (Dektak XT, Bruker, US). The photoluminescence quantum yield (PLQY) was measured with an integrating sphere connected to a multi-channel spectrometer (C9920-02G, Hamamatsu Photonics, JP).

For the LEC devices, pre-patterned indium-tin oxide (ITO) coated glass substrates (ITO thickness = 145 nm, ITO sheet resistance = 20 Ω/sq, substrate area = 30 × 30 mm2, Kintech, CHN) were cleaned by sequential 15 min ultrasonic treatment in detergent (Extran MA 01, Merck, GER), deionized water (two cycles to completely remove detergent), acetone, and isopropanol, and then dried in an oven at 120 °C for > 30 min. The ITO substrates were treated by a UV/ozone treatment for 10 min prior to spin coating to improve the ink wettability.

For the angle-dependent LEC measurement, the active-material ink based on the higher viscosity 10 g·l−1 Super Yellow master solution was spin coated with a spin speed of 2000–2300 rpm for 120 s, for the attainment of a dry active-material film thickness of ~ 175 nm. For the forward-luminance LEC measurement, the active-material ink based on the lower-viscosity 8 g·l−1 Super Yellow master solution was spin coated at a spin speed of 1500–2000 rpm for 60 s, for the attainment of a dry active-material film thickness of ~ 110 nm. The spin-coated active-material films were dried at 70 °C for 1 h on a hot plate.

The 100-nm thick Al top electrodes were deposited by thermal evaporation in a vacuum chamber (p ≤ 5 × 10–4 Pa), with a quartz crystal monitoring the Al evaporation rate (5–7 Å·s-1) and the Al thickness. A shadow mask positioned in between the evaporator source and the LEC device defined the size and shape of the Al electrodes. The spatial overlap between the Al and ITO electrodes defined four 2 × 2 mm2 LEC devices on each substrate. The Al top electrode was invariably biased as the negative cathode in all measurements.

The electron-only glass/ITO/Al/(Super Yellow:r-BV0)/Ca/Al devices were fabricated in a similar manner, but with a 100 nm thick Al electrode thermally evaporated onto the ITO surface, a 100 nm thick Super Yellow:r-BV0 blend film spin-coated onto the Al, and a 20 nm thick Ca layer thermally evaporated on the blend film.

The forward-luminance and the electron-only measurements were performed on non-encapsulated devices in the glove box. The forward luminance and the voltage were measured at a constant current density of 7.75 mA·cm−2, using a computer-controlled OLED lifetime setup (M6000 PMX, McScience, KOR).

The angle-dependent measurements were conducted under ambient air, and these devices were therefore encapsulated by attaching a 24 × 24 mm2 glass cover slide (Menzel GmbH, GER) onto the Al cathode side with UV-curable epoxy (E132-60 mL, Ossila). The epoxy was cured by exposure to UV light (λpeak = 365 nm, power density = 80 mW mm−2, UV-Exposure Box 1, Gie-Tec) for 15 min. The angle-dependent EL measurements were performed with a custom-built spectrogoniometer setup, essentially comprising a rotation stage, a stepper motor, and a fiber-optic CCD-array spectrometer (Flame-S, Ocean Optics)22. The forward emission was measured at 0°, and the viewing angle was varied from −80° to 80° in 10° steps. The spectrogoniometer was controlled with a Python-based virtual instrument using a Raspberry Pi 400. For these measurements, the devices were driven by a constant current density of 25 mA·cm-2 at a 21 V compliance voltage, with the current supplied and the voltage measured with a source measure unit (Keithley 2400).

The optical simulations were carried out with a commercial software (Setfos 5.2, Fluxim AG, CHE). The position of the emissive p–n junction within the active material was determined by minimizing the root mean square error between the simulated and the measured angle-dependent EL data. Further details on this procedure can be found in Ref22. The exciton formation rate profile in the interelectrode gap was determined with the drift–diffusion module of the same software (Setfos 5.3, Fluxim AG, CHE), and the simulated three-layer device featured an ITO anode (thickness = 145 nm), an active material (thickness = 150 nm), and an Al cathode. The parameter values for this device structure were gleaned from literature references25,64 and are listed in Table S1 in the Supporting Information. The simulated devices were driven by a constant voltage of 3 V.