Correction to: Scientific Reports https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-17776-x, published online 15 August 2022.
The original version of this Article contained an error in Figure 3, panel A, where the number of B6 mice “(6, 1)” was incorrectly given as “(6, 22)”. The original Figure 3 and accompanying legend appear below.
Comparison of efficiencies between the methodologies of 6 times transfer pulse (TP:6) and 3 times transfer pulse (TP:3) in the i-GONAD experiments. N; number of pups obtained in the i-GONAD experiments in each strain. (A) Overview of the pregnancy rates between TP:6 and TP:3. N.A., not analyzed. (B) Efficiencies of genome editing upon application of TP:6 and TP:3. The efficiencies were calculated by dividing the number of genome-edited pups by the number of all the sampled pups in each strain. The B6 strain and seven wild strains that displayed low pregnancy rates (< 20%) were further examined with the TP:3 condition.
The original Article has been corrected.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Imai, Y., Tanave, A., Matsuyama, M. et al. Author Correction: Efficient genome editing in wild strains of mice using the i-GONAD method. Sci Rep 13, 3417 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-30538-7
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-30538-7
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.
