Abstract
The Early Iron Age in Italy (end of the tenth to the eighth century BCE) was characterized by profound changes which influenced the subsequent political and cultural scenario in the peninsula. At the end of this period people from the eastern Mediterranean (e.g. Phoenicians and Greek people) settled along the Italian, Sardinian and Sicilian coasts. Among local populations, the so-called Villanovan culture group—mainly located on the Tyrrhenian side of central Italy and in the southern Po plain—stood out since the beginning for the extent of their geographical expansion across the peninsula and their leading position in the interaction with diverse groups. The community of Fermo (ninth–fifth century BCE), related to the Villanovan groups but located in the Picene area (Marche), is a model example of these population dynamics. This study integrates archaeological, osteological, carbon (δ13C), nitrogen (δ15N) (n = 25 human) and strontium (87Sr/86Sr) isotope data (n = 54 human, n = 11 baseline samples) to explore human mobility through Fermo funerary contexts. The combination of these different sources enabled us to confirm the presence of non-local individuals and gain insight into community connectivity dynamics in Early Iron Age Italian frontier sites. This research contributes to one of the leading historical questions of Italian development in the first millennium BCE.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Important changes characterized the Italian Peninsula during the Early Iron Age (EIA: end of the tenth to the eighth century BCE)1. After the Final Bronze Age, most cultural entities experienced profound social, cultural and structural internal changes associated with the increase of exchange networks among local and incoming groups. In this period, archaeological assemblages, defined by distinctive material culture and funerary rituals—which arguably corresponded later to specific ethnic entities (e.g. Latial culture = Latins, Atestina culture = Veneti, Golasecca culture = Leponti)—emerged regionally across the Italian Peninsula1. Meanwhile, in a later phase Phoenicians and Greek people from the eastern Mediterranean started to settle in Italy, Sicily and Sardinia2. The human groups associated with the Villanovan material culture (tenth–eighth century BCE) stood out among the emerging local groups because of their structural and territorial organization and dominant presence within a large part of Italy3. The main concentration of Villanovan sites was in Etruria in the central Tyrrhenian region and in the southern Po plain. Other sites, such as Verucchio, Pontecagnano, Capua, Sala Consilina and Fermo—the latter being the focus of this work—were scattered across the peninsula outside the main Villanovan area. Some scholars have recognized these sites as the outcome of the Villanovan (also known as Proto-Etruscan) expansion4, while others have favoured the interpretation of a local formation5,6 (Fig. 1).
The Villanovan material and ritual practices have been considered representative of one cultural entity because of the recurrent features and the geographical and cultural continuity between Villanovan and Etruscan settlements and necropolises7 (seventh–first century BCE), where the Etruscans have been considered an ethnic group recognized in the written sources. Villanovan sites often show: (a) a highly formalized funerary cremation ritual where typical vases with a distinctive neck were covered by in-turned rim bowls—both decorated with a distinctive geometric style—and employed as containers of the cremated human remains8; the urn was then placed within a pit and filled with “terra di rogo”—the pyre ashes (Supplementary Fig. S1); (b) a unique settlement structure which consisted of well-defined vast plateaux or hilltops (120–200 hectares, while secondary sites were 25–90 hectares) surrounded by necropolises and interpreted as a form of early state formation9; and (c) diagnostic bronze artefacts (e.g. bronze helmets, disc fibulae) which recurred in Villanovan necropolises.
Villanovan sites in Etruria witnessed a rapid and marked process of demographic nucleation together with a process of identity formation10. At the same time, the sites within and outside Etruria interwove relationships with different local populations and later with Greek people, as indicated by the presence of artefacts from different sources4 and hybrid features in the funerary ritual made up of mixed local and Villanovan funerary traditions11. The mixed assemblages documented in Villanovan sites outside Etruria have provoked vibrant debates about the ethnicity of those places6,12. Consequently, greater effort has been invested in the ethnic classification of those sites, neglecting aspects related to human connectivity and the impact the former had on the Villanovan group as a whole (see Supplementary Note).
The archaeological nature of the Fermo site
The funerary context of Fermo consists of the Misericordia (ninth–seventh century BCE) and the Mossa (second half of the eighth century BCE to the early fifth century BCE) necropolises, located along the north-west and north-east slopes of the Girfalco hill (Supplementary Fig. S2) in the central part of the Picene territory, on the Adriatic coast in the area between the Foglia and Tronto rivers (in the modern Marche region). Several excavations conducted at Fermo from the beginning of the twentieth century brought to light approximately 345 tombs, including both cremations and inhumations (see Supplementary Table S1 for the excavation campaigns). As recently suggested by Miranda and Esposito the two necropolises were used over five centuries (i.e. ninth to the early fifth century BCE), based on the typological analysis of the artefacts which has identified five main phases (I–V)13. In the current study, tombs from the ninth to the sixth century BCE were analysed and classified in three main chronological phases to ensure that each phase was adequately represented: Phase A, from the second half of the ninth century BCE to the first half of the eighth century BCE (represented by Phases I and IIA in Miranda and Esposito13); Phase B, the second half of the eighth century BCE (represented by Phase IIB in Miranda and Esposito13); and Phase C, from the seventh to the sixth century BCE (represented by Phases III and IV in Miranda and Esposito13). Phase V (end of the sixt to the beginning of the fifth century BCE) was not included in this study since the skeletal series from this phase is still under examination. Radiocarbon dating of inhumed and cremated bone samples from different phases as well as grave goods will be presented elsewhere because a long discussion—not possible here—of some methodological aspects is necessary.
The material culture and funerary ritual at Fermo reflected a completely different cultural profile compared with the surrounding Picene necropolises, especially in the earliest phases14. Fermo is itself located within a territory spread across the Marche and northern Abruzzo regions, characterized by the Picene material culture15. This archaeological culture is identified by the funerary ritual, which consisted of inhumations where crouched bodies were often placed on gravel beds (Fig. 2a), and by ornaments typical of this culture, such as spectacle fibulae, zoomorphic pectorals, bronze falere and the kothon (generally associated with female grave goods), a vase likely of ritual use15. Finally, the Picene area overall displays a different territorial organization compared with the contemporary Villanovan area of Etruria. Indeed, some studies have suggested that settlements in the medio-Adriatic area reached up a magnitude of roughly 20/30 hectares during the EIA1 (tenth to ninth century BCE)16. This is comparable to the proto-urban phenomenon of Latium vetus represented by sites that are smaller in scale compared to the ones in Etruria. However, it is not possible to recognize for the medio-Adriatic area a proto-urban phenomenon similar to the one attested in the Tyrrhenian sites due to a lack of necropolises that consist of hundreds or at least many tens of burials, like those of Etruria and Latium vetus during the EIA1. This might be due to a gap in the archaeological research, but it cannot be ruled out that the population size of the Picene centres grew rather slowly, increasing only later in the EIA2 (ninth to eighth century BCE).
Conversely, the funerary ritual at Fermo also includes the contemporary presence of cremations in Villanovan-type distinct-neck vases17 covered by bowls (Fig. 2b), concentrated in Phases A and B, along with supine inhumations only rarely laid out on gravel beds (Fig. 2c), documented in all chronological phases. In the earliest phases (Phase A), the ritual code in Fermo as in other Villanovan necropolises is quite specific and rigid, while a reworking of the symbols and codes is attested later on (Phase B). Moreover, the supposed expansion of the Fermo settlement (100 hectares according to Peroni5, but see Naso18, who estimates approximately 38 hectares), together with the position of the two necropolises, recall the smaller proto-urban model of Etruria. The presence of Villanovan funerary practices (although with some limited Picene influence), material culture and settlement structure has suggested Fermo as a Villanovan “island”19, “outpost”20 or “colony”21 in the Picene territory.
This work contributes to the understanding of the community structure of Fermo, by estimating the incidence of people born elsewhere over the course of time, using for the first time in this funerary context carbon (δ13C), nitrogen (δ15N) and strontium (87Sr/86Sr) isotope analyses (see Supplementary Note) on a sample of human bones and teeth, associated with archaeological, (palaeo)environmental and human osteological data. The present study examines the mode and tempo of residential mobilities, providing information on aspects otherwise invisible through the archaeological record alone, thus attempting to answer the long-standing research questions on the nature of Villanovan sites outside Etruria. Indeed, this article sets out to make a major contribution to one of the leading historical questions of Italian development in the first millennium BCE.
Results
Morphological and morphometric analyses of the human remains at Fermo
Out of 72 tombs (38 Misericordia necropolis; 34 Mossa necropolis) the osteological analysis identifies 120 individuals (Supplementary Table S2). Seventy-three individuals were inhumed (I), while 47 individuals were cremated (C), unevenly distributed among the three chronological phases (A, B and C) (Supplementary Table S3).
Of the sample so far analysed, the Misericordia necropolis had the highest percentage of cremations, reaching 93.3% in Phase A and 64.3% in Phase B; Phase C is represented in the analysed sample by a single inhumation grave only. The Mossa necropolis was not used during Phase A; cremations represented 41.4% of the burials in Mossa’s Phase B, and disappeared in Mossa’s Phase C.
Tombs contained single (n = 52), double (n = 11) or collective (n = 9) burials (the latter ranging from 3 to 14 individuals). At Misericordia, tombs were 89.5% single, 10.5% double, but collective tombs were not present. At Mossa, tombs were 52.9% single, 20.6% double and 26.5% collective. Moreover, double or collective burials were documented exclusively in the latter two phases, namely from the end of the eighth century BCE. The osteological analysis has estimated the presence of 34 females (F = 26; F(?) = 8), 48 males (M = 38; M(?) = 10), 13 adults of indeterminate sex (IND) and 25 subadults (SA; 0–15 years of age). Subadults include 2 newborn/early infants (NI = 0–1 years of age), 10 young children (YC = 1–5 years of age), 10 older children (OC = 5–10 years of age) and 3 juveniles (J = 10–15 years of age). Sex and age-at-death did not influence the choice of the funerary ritual: individuals of all age classes were cremated or inhumed. The sex ratio (M/F) for cremated individuals is 0.9. By contrast, the M/F ratio is less balanced for inhumed individuals, namely 2.2. The M/F ratio by chronological phase is: Phase A = 0.4; Phase B = 1.6; Phase C = 2.1.
δ13CVPDB and δ15NAIR results
Nine out of 25 samples did not meet quality control criteria (Supplementary Table S4) and were excluded from the analysis. For the remaining 16 human samples, C:N atomic ratios (C:Na) fall in the range between 2.9 and 3.6, which indicates good collagen preservation22. Female individuals (n = 4) have δ13C that ranges from − 20.03 to − 19.45 ‰ and δ15N from 7.81 to 8.25 ‰. Male individuals (n = 7) have δ13C that has a range from − 20.12 to − 19.68 ‰ and δ15N from 7.92 ‰ to 8.62 ‰, while for only one adult individual sex was not determined (δ13C = − 19.84 ‰; δ15N = 8.94 ‰). Subadult individuals (n = 4) (all outside the breastfeeding period) have δ13C that ranges from − 20.16 to − 19.47 ‰ and δ15N from 7.19 to 8.05 ‰. While the δ13C range is overall similar for all the analysed categories, δ15N is slightly higher for male individuals, but these are marginally more represented than the other categories. Since faunal remains are poorly represented at Fermo, the environmental context has been estimated based on a study conducted on the closest available site to Fermo23 (Supplementary Table S5). Even though the selected samples come from different chronological and geographical environments, these represent the best available comparative record. δ13C and δ15N values for Fermo human samples are here plotted together with faunal isotope values from a Bronze Age site in Puglia (Fig. 3), to our knowledge, the single comparative sample available in the literature for the Adriatic region and closer in time to Fermo. The individuals from Fermo had a diet based on C3 plants and displayed an extraordinarily narrow variability, thus suggesting a homogenous diet across all sexes and ages. Additionally, these data exclude the significant consumption of marine food among Fermo’s individuals, important information for the 87Sr/86Sr results (Supplementary Note).
87Sr/86Sr results
Geological assessment of the area around Fermo
The area around Fermo, located between the coast and the Apennines, is mainly dominated by sedimentary sequences—marly limestone and sandstone—which comprise Upper Cenozoic (Pliocene–Pleistocene) formations with 87Sr/86Sr values ranging from 0.7085 to 0.709224. A mineral water sample from the area (43°09′00.00″ N 13°43′12.00″E) has produced a 87Sr/86Sr value of 0.709025 (Supplementary Fig. S3).
Biologically available strontium (BASr) at Fermo
Understanding bioavailable strontium through careful analysis is essential for interpreting human mobility26; the baseline samples collected at Fermo (archaeological fauna tooth enamel n = 2; snail shell n = 2; soil n = 1) have 87Sr/86Sr values in the range of 0.7085 to 0.7088, which is narrower than expected for the regional geological formations. For this reason, other samples were also collected in a maximum 7 km radius (soil n = 2; grass n = 2; water n = 2), yielding an 87Sr/86Sr range of 0.7087 to 0.7092 in agreement with the geological data (see Supplementary Table S6 and Supplementary Fig. S4). Snail shells from the Mossa necropolis display less radiogenic values than the other samples (FM-SR-SNAIL2 = 0.7085, FM-SR-SNAIL3 = 0.7086). The overall BASr range estimated for Fermo is 0.7085 to 0.7092.
Strontium results from human samples at Fermo
The list of 87Sr/86Sr values for 54 human individuals analysed at Fermo is provided in Supplementary Table S7. The corresponding 87Sr/86Sr ratios of human samples range between 0.70882 and 0.70968, which is wider than expected from the local geological formation and BASr values. Some basic statistical parameters on the entire sample are reported in Supplementary Table S8. The complete dataset has a mean of 0.70900 and has a rather narrow standard deviation (sd = 0.00019).
Discussion
The local 87Sr/86Sr baseline is based on a cumulative approach (see Methods and Supplementary Note for details), namely: (a) an initial geological assessment of the area around Fermo (see 87Sr/86Sr results); (b) biologically available strontium (BASr) on modern environmental samples and archaeological specimens (see 87Sr/86Sr results); (c) statistical analysis of the shape of the human sample distribution; and (d) the range of values for the youngest individuals in the sample, namely young children (YC = 0–5 years of age) and older children (OC = 5–10 years of age). As reported in the results, diverse samples (e.g. archaeological fauna, snail shell, soil, grass and water) were collected within 7 km of Fermo. In agreement with other studies24, snail shell samples have lower 87Sr/86Sr values, and this might be due to the amount of soil carbonate incorporated in their diet27. Therefore, even if snail shells have been used to construct local baselines28,29, they seem not to be the most appropriate samples in the Fermo case. By contrast, grass (FM-SR-GRASS1 = 0.7091, FM-SR-GRASS3 = 0.7092) and water (FM-SR-WATER1 = 0.7091, FM-SR-WATER2 = 0.7091) have higher values than soil and archaeological fauna (Supplementary Fig. S4). A possible explanation is that sea spray (marine 87Sr/86Sr = 0.7092—McArthur et al.30) and/or dust influenced grass and, to a certain extent, water values in the area between 0 and 7 km distance from Fermo31. To make a good estimate of the BASr at Fermo, snail shells and grass values are excluded as too low and too high respectively. Hence, the BASr for Fermo is considered to range between 0.7087 and 0.7091.
If we consider the overall 87Sr/86Sr human data (c), the normal probability quantile–quantile plot (Q–Q plot) of human samples 87Sr/86Sr values (Supplementary Fig. S5) graphically highlights at least 9 out of 54 samples that visibly stand out from the normal distribution. The central trend of the human data at Fermo, which is given by our entire sample except the 9 outliers identified in the Q–Q plot, ranges from 0.70882 to 0.70909.
The shape of the sample distribution of 87Sr/86Sr helps identify possible outliers and age-related patterns. The kernel density estimate of the sample distribution (Supplementary Fig. S6) shows a multimodal pattern with a skewed tail towards higher radiogenic values. Using the young and older children’s (d) intervals as possible additional proxies of the local signal (see Supplementary Note), it is possible to define a local range of 0.70883 to 0.70908 that matches the shape of the whole sample distribution. Using Tukey’s interquartile range method (1.5xIQR) to identify outliers32, only 4 individuals showing the highest radiogenic values can be considered outliers.
Hence the various baseline ranges, namely: environmental values (0.7087 to 0.7091), the shape of the sample distribution of the human data (0.70882 to 0.70909) and the values based on the youngest individuals in the sample (0.70883 to 0.70908) are overall in good agreement, while Tukey’s IQR method is evidently too broad and tends to include individuals outside the normal distribution of the 87Sr/86Sr ratio.
If the wider baseline range (0.7087 to 0.7091) is considered as the most probable interval to identify individuals born locally, regardless of consideration of differential chronology and ritual, the number of non-local individuals at Fermo is 9 (16.7%), with individuals with values between 0.7091 and 0.7092 possibly considered as non-locals and those higher than 0.7092 as non-locals.
The origin and character of the Villanovan sites outside Etruria have been the subject of debate for a long time. However, the nature of the archaeological record did not always allow a clear-cut interpretation of the sites (see Supplementary Note). The δ13C and δ15N data at Fermo illustrates that overall, inhumed individuals had a relatively homogenous diet, consuming C3 plants and a reasonable amount of protein with no or negligible marine food consumption. This latter aspect is crucial for a correct evaluation and assessment of 87Sr/86Sr analysis since marine strontium values (0.7092) can influence general 87Sr/86Sr values. Furthermore, the combined findings of the current study indicate for the first time the presence of non-local individuals at Fermo, disproving the hypothesis of a completely local formation of the site (see Supplementary Note). The percentage of 16.7% of non-local individuals is higher than in the contemporary Iron Age contexts (ca 8%)33. However, this general figure must be unravelled in the light of osteological (sex and age-at-death) and archaeological (chronology and funerary ritual) information.
Even though diverse types of samples were used for cremated (pars petrosa and more rarely tooth enamel) and inhumed (tooth enamel) individuals, the 87Sr/86Sr values for the two mortuary practices display a similar range (cremation: min = 0.70893 and max = 0.70968; inhumation: min = 0.70882 and max = 0.70958) in the entire sample. Conversely, if we consider only the individuals that fell within the wider baseline range, the difference between the 87Sr/86Sr range in cremations and inhumations is statistically significant (t = 3.8362, df = 37.564, p-value = 0.0002). Figure 4 illustrates that 87Sr/86Sr values in cremated individuals are more radiogenic than inhumed ones even if they partially overlap (cremation: min = 0.70893 and max = 0.70909; inhumation: min = 0.70882 and max = 0.70898). Tooth enamel samples’ 87Sr/86Sr values are less radiogenic and closer to the 87Sr/86Sr values of environmental samples collected at the site of Fermo, namely soil and fauna samples (87Sr/86Sr = 0.7087).
Hence, it could be hypothesized that tooth enamel 87Sr/86Sr values were overprinted by diagenesis34. However, this hypothesis is weak because of the well-known resistance of enamel to diagenesis35 and the fact that dentine was completely removed from the tooth thanks to a specific sampling protocol (see Methods and Supplementary Fig. S7). By contrast, it is unlikely that the petrous bone from cremated individuals underwent diagenesis36 because the samples were fully calcined, as shown by FTIR (Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy) analysis run for 14C dating (see Supplementary Table S7). It can arguably be suggested that the difference in 87Sr/86Sr values in cremated and inhumed individuals is likely related to endogenous factors. Therefore, we detail the analysis of the Fermo samples, considering cremated and inhumed remains separately.
Figure 5 illustrates cremated and inhumed individuals distributed over two kernel density plots. The inhumed density plot is more homogenous, while the cremated one is broader and tends towards more radiogenic values. The children range for inhumed and cremated individuals partially overlap, but a clear tendency toward more radiogenic values is evident for cremated children too. According to this evidence, it is possible to suggest that the range of inhumed children might represent a more reasonable estimate of the local range at Fermo and indicate that some of the cremated children could have been born elsewhere. In any case, the entire range for children (0.70883 to 0.70908) can be assumed as a more parsimonious estimate of the local range. If we adopt this latter as the 87Sr/86Sr baseline at Fermo, the number of non-local individuals rises to 12 (22.2%), considering that the lower value of the entire children range (0.70883) lies within the FM-SR-38 = 0.70882 ± 0.00002 interval (see Supplementary Table S7), considering this latter as local.
Among cremated individuals (n = 24), 45.8% are non-local, while 3.3% of the inhumed individuals are allochthonous. Notably, the mobility seems similar among male and female individuals (5 and 6 individuals respectively), thus adding new insight about the biological sex of individuals who moved to Fermo. The sex ratio (Phase A + Phase B) is 1.1, and therefore it does not bias the scoring of mobility by sex.
If the samples are considered according to chronological phases (Fig. 6), 3 out of 7 individuals from Phase A are non-local. Even if the small sample number for Phase A requires a cautious approach, a substantial percentage of individuals (42.9%) can be considered non-local. Nine individuals out of 29 from Phase B are non-local, namely 31%. All the individuals from Phase C fall within the children range; hence they can all be considered locals. The 4 individuals with indeterminate chronology are all local.
Figure 7 reports a tentative application of the Ma et al.37 method for isotope-based geographical assignment. The method itself attempts to infer the geographical origin from an isoscape based on a variety of isotopes. Although the present analysis employs a single isotope isoscape24 and the stochastic approach of the method itself, it is worth noting that results fit nicely with the archaeological expectation of the most radiogenic individuals probably originating ca. 180 km away from Fermo within an area that encompasses the original Villanovan area of Etruria.
The current study has, by comparing archaeological (i.e. chronological and funerary ritual information) and isotopic data, revealed for the first time that people arrived at the site at different times, even if new arrivals decreased from Phase A to Phase C. Moreover, the high percentage of non-locally born individuals, albeit on a small sample, in Phase A is consistent with the archaeological data38; indeed, a rigorous ritual tradition which consists of few grave goods that accompany traditional distinct-neck urns that strictly followed models from Etruria was present at Fermo in the earliest phases. The presence of allochthonous individuals in Phase B adds to the previous archaeological hypothesis19,20,21 that suggests human mobility at Fermo only in the initial phase, namely the ninth century BCE. Finally, the absence of non-local individuals in Phase C is in line with more recent archaeological interpretations, which have shown that Fermo developed its own funerary practice and autonomous tradition in this period, which differs from typical late Villanovan/Etruscan and Picene customs13. A possible reconstructed scenario could be that a group of at least partially non-local individuals who settled at Fermo (Phase A) were followed by other individuals coming from the original homeland (Phase B). Later, this flow of non-local individuals ended (Phase C), and Fermo developed a peculiar local mixed funerary tradition.
The isotopic results have, in part, confirmed that the difference in the funerary ritual indicates a difference in the provenance of the individuals. However, it cannot be excluded that among the individuals considered isotopically local, there could be some non-local individuals from a geographical region with similar 87Sr/86Sr baseline values to Fermo. In any case, it is impossible to distinguish whether cremated individuals with local 87Sr/86Sr signatures were the offspring of immigrants or of local people who partially adopted a foreign tradition.
Some of the tombs with typical Villanovan features are isotopically local (e.g. Tomb 45, Misericordia necropolis, Bonfigli excavation). In contrast, other tombs with local and Villanovan elements can be either isotopically local (e.g. Tomb 44, Misericordia necropolis, Bonfigli excavation) or non-local (Tomb 78, Mossa necropolis, 1999–2000 excavation). Tomb 17 (Mossa necropolis, 1999–2000 excavation)—the only inhumation with the highest radiogenic 87Sr/86Sr values (87Sr/86Sr = 0.70958)—does not show any characteristic archaeological features that can recall either the Picene or the Villanovan environment.
Collective tombs such as Tomb 11 (Mossa necropolis, 1968 excavation) include both inhumations and cremations. In this tomb, the cremated individual (11_5) has non-local values (87Sr/86Sr = 0.70920), while the inhumed individuals (n = 3) fall within the local range (Tomb 11_2 = 0.70888, Tomb 11_3 = 0.70891, Tomb 11_4 = 0.70892). Even though kinship relationships cannot be fully reconstructed for these cases because of the presence of cremated individuals, these findings suggest a possible integration between allochthonous and autochthonous individuals at an extended group level.
This work illustrates the highly complex relationship between groups of diverse origins and specific forms of funerary ritual and material culture. As well as contributing towards the understanding of an important historical question, we can suggest that these relationships are multifaceted, since the agency of identity is a matter of social choice and not determined by biology.
Overall, the data highlight that groups of people of both sexes moved to Fermo in diverse periods. All the analysed data enables us to build a model for mobility phenomena at Fermo that can eventually be expanded, quantified and tested on other Villanovan sites within and outside Etruria (Fig. 8).
Conclusion
The Italian Peninsula witnessed profound changes in the population dynamics during the EIA. The method used has for the first time provided a nuanced and multifaceted picture of the type and mode of human mobility in an EIA Italian community linked to the emerging Etruscans. From a specific archaeological perspective, the presence of non-local individuals during the first phases of life of the Fermo community has reinforced the notion that the site was part of a broader Villanovan network. The paper has indeed provided new evidence and interpretation of the changes in social construction and funerary representation that only partially emerged from the archaeological record, by directly considering aspects of human mobility from independent biological data. This work provides a model for understanding human mobility in EIA groups in Italy which can be expanded to and tested on other contemporary sites, further delineating central aspects of past human connectivity and its effect on ancient groups. It contributes to the historical reconstruction and comprehension of population dynamics and growing networks in the Italian EIA, which underwrote the later development of the Roman-world hegemony, where mobility and the capture of large populations were on a substantially greater scale.
Methods
Morphological and morphometric analyses of the human remains
This study analysed 72 inhumations and cremations (38 tombs from the Misericordia necropolis and 34 tombs from the Mossa necropolis). This research was accomplished following the relevant regulations for the treatment of ancient human remains. Permits for osteological and isotopic analyses were granted by the Soprintendenza Archeologia, Belle Arti e Paesaggio delle Marche and the Polo Museale delle Marche (Prot. 0000370 of 2017, Prot. 0000369 of 2017, Prot. 3556 of 2018, Prot. 3226 of 2018).
The osteological analysis focused on (a) the estimation of the minimum number of individuals (MNI); and (b) the determination of the demographic profile (sex and age-at-death) of the skeletal sample for each grave. The sex estimation of inhumed adult individuals was based on (a) dimorphic traits of the skull (e.g. nuchal crest, mastoid process, supraorbital margin, glabella and mental eminence) and pelvis (e.g. greater sciatic notch, preauricular sulcus, ischiopubic ramus); and (b) general observation of the relative robusticity/gracility of the skeleton among the skeletal series39,40. The sex estimation for cremated individuals was based on morphological traits and sexual metric dimorphism following Cavazzuti et al.41.
Age-at-death of subadults in both cremations and inhumations was based on (a) dental formation and the eruption of deciduous and permanent dentitions42; (b) long bone length43; and (c) epiphyseal closure of skeletal elements44. The age-at-death of adult individuals was estimated on (a) tooth-wear patterns in the permanent dentition45; and (b) degenerative changes of the sternal rib epiphysis46,47, (c) of the symphyseal surface of the pubic symphysis48, and (d) of the auricular surface of the ilium49.
Isotopic analysis of δ13CVPDB and δ15NAIR in human bone collagen
To understand the dietary variability across age and sex and to estimate the marine contribution to the diet, which potentially influences the 87Sr/86Sr results, 25 inhumed individuals’ ribs were analysed for δ13C and δ15N. Collagen was extracted from the samples following the protocol of 14CHRONO Centre (QUB)50. The C:Na ratio (ratio of carbon to nitrogen atoms) was determined on the same collagen by elemental analysis on the EA-IRMS51. All extracts that contained C:Na ratios outside a range of 2.9–3.6 were not included since their isotopic composition may have been compromised by diagenetic alteration52,53.
87Sr/86Sr analysis
Overall 87Sr/86Sr methodology follows Müller et al.54. Fifty-four human specimens (petrous bone, n = 23; tooth enamel, n = 31) were sampled for 87Sr/86Sr isotope analyses. A balance in the ratio of the sample in accordance with funerary ritual was kept, i.e. cremations (n = 24) and inhumations (n = 30). Petrous bone samples were favoured in cremations, with only one tooth enamel (M3) sample analysed. Enamel of the first (M1, n = 27) and more rarely, second (M2, n = 1) permanent molars was used in inhumations (see Supplementary Note). Only in two cases were deciduous teeth (m1, n = 1; m2, n = 1) selected. The assessment of the local 87Sr/86Sr baseline was based on a multi-factorial approach (see Supplementary Notes), namely: (a) geological assessment of the area (Supplementary Fig. S3); (b) an estimate of the strontium isotopic ratio (87Sr/86Sr) baseline on modern environmental samples and archaeological specimens; (c) the shape of the sample distribution of the human data55,56, assuming that the majority of the individuals are local57; and (d) the range of values for the youngest individuals in the sample, namely young and older children (1–10 years of age). Regarding (b), to avoid possible bias, different samples were selected, considering the lithological compositions of the area around Fermo within a 0–7 km distance. The 11 samples included archaeological fauna from the medieval excavation of Area Vallesi at Fermo (n = 2), modern snail shells (n = 2), water (n = 2), soil (n = 3) and plants (n = 2). Multiple samples were selected from the same area to spot possible differences in 87Sr/86Sr values (see Supplementary Table S6). Woodland zones were preferred to minimize the risk of contamination by modern sources of 87Sr/86Sr (e.g. modern fertilizer). The optimum sample mass was ~ 2 g for soil, ~ 1.5 g for grass, ~ 0.015 g for snails and ~ 15 ml for water.
Sampling procedures
As for cremations, the petrous bone was abraded to remove surface contaminants using a dental bur. The otic capsule was separated from the cremated petrous portions using a 1 mm mechanical saw mounted on a drilling machine (DREMEL® model 300), following Harvig et al.58. Subsequently, the densest part of the central inner ear was sampled using a low-speed drill (2 mm diameter), producing clean samples of intact otic capsules for the Sr isotope analyses. The bone powder was stored in pre-cleaned plastic Eppendorf (1.5 ml) vials. The bone powder mass ranged between 0.02 and 0.04 g. As for inhumations, upper molar enamel was sampled from the protocone, or mesiolingual, cusp to the cement enamel junction (CEJ), whereas lower molars were sampled from the occlusal margin of the protoconid, or mesiobuccal, cusp to the CEJ, following Müller et al.54. A flexible diamond-edged rotary wheel mounted on a drilling machine (DREMEL® model 300) was used to cut a longitudinal crown section of the cusps. Adhering contaminants such as soil, sediments and all trace of dentine were removed using a dental bur. The tooth enamel mass ranged between 0.02 and 0.04 g.
For 9 samples (from FM-SR-52 to FM-SR-60), a different methodology was adopted to sample bulk enamel, similar to the method proposed by Czermak et al.59 for dental roots. This technique was employed to remove any dentine trace, which can be affected by diagenesis and can influence 87Sr/86Sr values contained in enamel samples (Supplementary Note). Teeth were cleaned and photographed. Subsequently, samples were covered in Crystalbond 590 Mounting Adhesive (Aremco Products, Inc.) before being embedded in resin. Crystalbond is a transparent resin, reversible in acetone, which isolates the tooth when it is embedded in epoxy resin.
Teeth were embedded in an epoxy resin and subsequently longitudinally cut following Nava et al. 60. Sections were made passing through the tip of the dentine horn along the buccolingual plane. Once the cut was performed, dentine was thoroughly removed with a dental bur. The section was immersed in acetone to free the tooth from the resin (Supplementary Fig. S7).
Laboratory procedure
Petrous bone powder
Bone powder samples were leached in 0.25 M acetic acid (CH3COOH). Leached samples were put in an ultrasonic agitation bath for 10 min and let stand for ~ 3 h. Samples were centrifuged. After removing the acetic acid with an acid-cleaned disposable pipette, samples were rinsed with Milli-Q® water. The remaining leachate was stored. After being centrifuged, Milli-Q® water was removed with disposable pipettes for each sample. Two ml of 14 M HNO3 was added to the vials. Samples were transferred from centrifuge vials to Teflon™ beakers for dissolution. Teflon™ beakers were previously cleaned with 14 M HNO3 and rinsed with Milli-Q® water. Teflon™ beakers were closed and placed on a hotplate overnight at 150 °C, then opened and put on the hotplate at 150 °C to be evaporated. This step was repeated (2–3 times) until the full dissolution of samples.
Tooth enamel samples (human and fauna)
Samples were pre-treated with 1 ml of acetone for 3–5 min in an ultrasonic agitation bath, followed by 1 ml of methanol (CH3OH) for 3–5 min in an ultrasonic agitation bath. Samples were rinsed three times, with 1 ml of Milli-Q® water, taking care of discharging the different liquids for each step. After cleaning, tooth enamel samples were leached to remove and minimize diagenetic contamination from the enamel. Samples were left in 0.25 M acetic acid (CH3COOH) in an ultrasonic agitation bath for 10 min and let stand for ~ 6 h. Samples were transferred from centrifuge vials to Teflon™ beakers for dissolution. Teflon™ beakers were previously cleaned with 14 M HNO3 and rinsed with Milli-Q® water. One ml of 14 M HNO3 was added to each sample in the Teflon™ beakers. The Teflon™ beakers were closed and placed on a hotplate overnight at 150 °C. Once the samples were fully dissolved, the Teflon™ beakers were left open on the hotplate at 150 °C to let them evaporate.
Vegetation
Dried grass samples were cut into small pieces and transferred into cleaned Teflon™ beakers. Samples were directly dissolved in 10–15 ml of 14 M HNO3. Teflon™ beakers were placed on the hotplate at 150 °C overnight, then opened and left on a hotplate at 150 °C until full evaporation. These steps were repeated until the complete dissolution of samples (3–4 times).
Soil
Soil samples were moved into cleaned Teflon™ beakers and leached, adding 8 ml of 0.25 M acetic acid (CH3COOH) and left to stand for ~ 36 h. The leachate was extracted with a pipette and then centrifuged. The centrifuged liquid was transferred into pre-cleaned 15 ml Teflon™ beakers and dried down on a hotplate at 150 °C. To destroy any organic material left, 2 ml 14 M HNO3 was added into Teflon™ beakers and left overnight on the hotplate at 150 °C. The Teflon™ beakers were opened and placed on the hotplate at 150 °C to be fully evaporated.
Water
Water samples were dried down on the hotplate at 110 °C. The leftover residue was further treated with 0.5 ml 14 M HNO3 and placed on the hotplate at 150 °C for ~ 1 h. 14 M HNO3 was subsequently evaporated.
Snail shells
Snail shell samples were thoroughly cleaned with a DREMEL® dental bur. Samples were then dissolved in 2 ml of 14N HNO3 and then evaporated.
Sr from all samples was extracted using miniaturized extraction chromatographic columns filled with EICHROM Sr Spec Resin for separating Rb and Sr and removing the major matrix elements (such as Ca, P etc.). 300 μl of 3N HNO3 was added into Teflon™ beakers to re-dissolve the samples. Labelled Teflon™ beakers were placed on a hotplate at 100 °C for ~ 30–60 min. Samples were pipetted into assigned Teflon™ columns filled with 100 µl EICHROM Sr Spec Resin using acid-cleaned pipette tips. Labelled Rb Teflon™ beakers were placed under labelled columns. 950 μl of 3 M HNO3 was added into each Teflon™ column for the cleaning procedure. The discharged liquid was collected as Rb beakers, followed by 1200 μl of Milli-Q® water which was collected as Sr fraction. The Sr Teflon™ beakers were closed and placed on the hotplate at 100 °C for ~ 2 h to evaporate the samples fully. This separation step for the Sr fractions was repeated twice in total.
87Sr/86Sr ratios were measured in static mode using Neptune™ Multicollector ICPMS technology at the Frankfurt Isotope and Element Research Center (FIERCE) of the Goethe University (see Müller & Anczkiewicz61). The reproducibility of the Sr isotopic standard SRM987 during the course of analysis is given in Supplementary Tables S6 and S7 captions, and was always within error of the accepted value of 0.710245. Sr blank measurements were conducted using a dilute 84Sr-enriched tracer solution (“spike”) and found to be negligible relative to the relatively large Sr samples processed.
FTIR (Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy) analysis
Within a more extensive 14C study of the necropolises, FTIR analysis on 5 individuals (Supplementary Table S7) was performed at the 14CHRONO Centre for Climate, the Environment, and Chronology in the School of Natural and Built Environment at Queen’s University Belfast to check on the degree of cremation (crystallinity index or splitting factor).
To prepare a disc for FTIR, 1–1.5 mg of sample was mixed with 0.15–0.2 g of spectrosol grade KBr. This was ground using an agate pestle and mortar until the sample was less than 63 um. The sample was pressed into a pellet using a Specac hydraulic press, at 10,000 kg for 3 min. The disc was then analysed using a Perkin Elmer Spectrum One FTIR spectrometer. Samples with crystallinity above 5 were considered sufficiently re-crystallized62 and radiocarbon-dated. Samples were stored in a sealed vial before hydrolysis with stock (85%) orthophosphoric acid (15 ml per g of bone).
Statistical analyses
The open-access software R (version 4.2) was used for statistical analyses and to plot data in graphs (quantile–quantile plots, kernel density distribution estimate plots, box–and–whiskers plots)63. The “assignR” package37 was used to test the provenance probability of the non-local individuals across the Italian isoscape24 (the R code is reported in the Supplementary Note). In brief, the method of Ma et al. uses a Bayesian approach, where the prior probability assumes that all grid cells are equally likely locations of origin of a specific individual. The posterior probability of sample origin is computed at each grid cell (based on the isotope ratio of the samples), returning a raster object which contains one probability density surface per sample with its likely provenance. Multiple samples can be combined together (joint probability) assuming they come from the same area. A variable prediction error (standard deviation), resulting from the Kriging interpolation, was associated to the isoscape cells. The used raster files are reported as examples in the supplement (Supplementary Fig. S8) and can be downloaded from: https://www.geochem.unimore.it/sr-isoscape-of-italy/.
Data availability
All the data are fully available within the Supplementary Information.
References
Bietti Sestieri, A. M. L’Italia Nell’età del Bronzo e del Ferro: Dalle Palafitte a Romolo (2200–700 a.C.) (Carocci, 2010).
Gras, M. Il Mediterraneo Nell’età Arcaica (Fondazione Paestum, 1997).
Bietti Sestieri, A. M. Il Villanoviano: un problema archeologico di storia mediterranea. In Le Origini Degli Etruschi: Storia Archeologia Antropologia (ed. Belelli, V.) 249–277 (L’erma di Bretschneider, 2012).
Bartoloni, G. La Cultura Villanoviana All’inizio Della Storia Etrusca (Carocci, 2002).
Peroni, R. Villanoviano a Fermo? In La Civiltà Picena Nelle Marche: Studi in Onore di Giovanni Annibaldi. Ancona, 10–13 luglio 1988 (ed. Dardari, M.) 13–38 (Maroni, 1992).
Peroni, R. Variazioni sul tema del concetto di ‘Villanoviano’ applicato alla Campania. In La Presenza Etrusca Nella Campania Meridionale: Atti Delle Giornate di Studio. Salerno-Pontecagnano, 16–18 novembre 1990 (eds Gastaldi, P. & Maetzke, G.) 37–48 (Olschki, 1994).
Spivey, N. & Stoddart, S. Etruscan Italy (Batsford, 1990).
Iaia, C. Simbolismo Funerario e Ideologia Alle Origini di Una Civiltà Urbana: Forme Rituali Nelle Sepolture ‘Villanoviane’ a Tarquinia e Vulci, e Nel Loro Entroterra (All’Insegna del Giglio, 1999).
Pacciarelli, M. Dal Villaggio Alla Città: La Svolta Protourbana del 1000 a.C. Nell’Italia Tirrenica (All’Insegna del Giglio, 2000).
Stoddart, S. Power and place in Etruria. In Eurasia at the Dawn of History (eds Fernández-Götz, M. & Krausse, D.) 304–318 (Cambridge University Press, 2017).
Cuozzo, M. & Pellegrino, C. Culture meticce, identità etnica, dinamiche di conservatorismo e resistenza: questioni teoriche e casi di studio dalla Campania. In Conceptualising Early Colonisation (eds Donnellan, L. et al.) 117–136 (IHBR-BHIR, 2016).
d’Agostino, B. Gli Etruschi e gli altri nella Campania settentrionale. In Atti del XXVI Convegno di Studi Etruschi ed Italici: Caserta–Santa Maria Capua Vetere– Capua–Teano, 11–15 novembre 2007 (eds. Paoletti, O. & Bettini, M. C.) 69–91 (Fabrizio Serra Editore, 2011).
Miranda, P. & Esposito, C. Sulla periodizzazione delle necropoli protostoriche di Fermo. Mitteilungen Dtsch. Archäol. Inst. Römische Abteilung (RM) 127, 63–109 (2021).
von Eles, P. & Baldelli, G. Romagna and the Marches. In Etruscology (ed. Naso, A.) 1453–1500 (De Gruyter, 2017).
Naso, A. I Piceni: Storia e Archeologia delle Marche in Epoca Pre-Romana (Longanesi & Co., 2000).
Peroni, R. Il Bronzo finale e la prima età del Ferro nelle Marche. In Preistoria e Protostoria delle Marche. Atti della XXXVIII Riunione Scientifica dell’Istituto Italiano di Preistoria e Protostoria. Portonovo, Abbadia di Fiastra, 1–5 ottobre 2003 721–738 (Istituto Italiano di Preistoria e Protostoria, 2005).
Iaia, C. & Pacciarelli, M. La cremazione in area mediotirrenica tra Bronzo Finale e Primo Ferro. In Les Necròpolis D’incineració Entre L’Ebre i el Tíber (Segles IX–VI aC): Metodologia, Pràctiques Funeràries i Societat (eds Rovira Hortalà, M. C. et al.) 341–355 (Mac, 2012).
Naso, A. I Piceni: prospettiva archeologica. In Entre Archéologie et Histoire: Dialogues sur Divers Peuples de L’Italie Préromaine, E pluribus Unum? Italy from the Pre-Roman Fragmentation to the Augustan Unity (eds Aberson, M. et al.) 151–165 (Peter Lang, 2014).
Pallottino, M. Etruscologia (Hoepli, 1984).
Lollini, D. La civiltà Picena. In Popoli e Civiltà Dell’Italia Antica (eds Cianfarani, V. et al.) 107–195 (Biblioteca di Storia Patria, 1976).
Torelli, M. La storia. In Rasenna—Storia e Civiltà Degli Etruschi (eds Pallottino, M. et al.) 15–76 (Garzanti/Scheiwiller, 1986).
Nelson, B. K., DeNiro, M. J., Schoeninger, M. J. D., de Paolo, J. & Hare, P. E. Effects of diagenesis on strontium, carbon, nitrogen and oxygen concentration and isotopic composition of bone. Geochem. Cosm. Acta 50, 1941–1949 (1986).
Miller, D. Stable Carbon and Nitrogen Isotope Analysis in Italy and Croatia: Bronze Age Food Practices Across the Adriatic (Sapienza University of Rome, 2018).
Lugli, F. et al. A strontium isoscape of Italy for provenance studies. Chem. Geol. 587, 120624 (2022).
Voerkelius, S. et al. Strontium isotopic signatures of natural mineral waters, the reference to a simple geological map and its potential for authentication of food. Food Chem. 118, 933–940 (2010).
Holt, E., Evans, J. A. & Madgwick, R. Strontium (87Sr/86Sr) mapping: a critical review of methods and approaches. Earth Sci. Rev. 216, 103593 (2021).
Britton, K. et al. Sampling plants and malacofauna in 87Sr/86Sr bioavailability studies: implications for isoscape mapping and reconstructing of past mobility patterns. Front. Ecol. Evolut. 8, 579473 (2020).
Price, T. D., Burton, J. H. & Bentley, R. A. The characterization of biologically available strontium isotope ratios for the study of prehistoric migration. Archaeometry 44, 117–135 (2002).
Nafplioti, A. “Mycenaean” political domination of Knossos following the Late Minoan IB destructions on Crete: negative evidence from strontium isotope ratio analysis (87Sr/86Sr). J. Archaeol. Sci. 35, 2307–2317 (2008).
McArthur, J. M., Howarth, R. J. & Bailey, T. R. Strontium isotope stratigraphy: LOWESS version 3: best fit to the marine Sr-isotope curve for 0–509 Ma and accompanying look-up table for deriving numerical age. J. Geol. 109, 155–170 (2001).
Alonzi, E., Pacheco-Forés, S. I., Gordon, G. W., Kuijt, I. & Knudson, K. J. New understandings of the sea spray effect and its impact on bioavailable radiogenic strontium isotope ratios in coastal environments. J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep. 33, 102462 (2020).
Lightfoot, E. & O’Connell, T. On the use of biomineral oxygen isotope data to identify human migrants in the archaeological record: intra-sample variation, statistical methods and geographical considerations. PLoS One 11, e0153850 (2016).
Leppard, T., Esposito, C. & Esposito, M. The bioarchaeology of migration in the ancient Mediterranean: meta-analysis of radiogenic (87Sr/86Sr) isotope ratios. J. Mediterr. Archaeol. 33, 211–241 (2020).
Madgwick, R., Mulville, J. & Evans, J. Investigating diagenesis and the suitability of porcine enamel for strontium (87Sr/86Sr) isotope analysis. J. Anal. At. Spectrom 27, 733–742 (2012).
Bentley, A. Strontium isotopes from the earth to the archaeological skeleton: a review. J. Archaeol. Method Theory 13, 135–187 (2006).
Snoeck, C. et al. Calcined bone provides a reliable substrate for strontium isotope ratios as shown by an enrichment experiment. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 29, 107–114 (2015).
Ma, C., Vander Zanden, H. B., Wunder, M. B. & Bowen, G. J. assignR: an r package for isotope-based geographic assignment. Methods Ecol. Evol. 11, 996–1001 (2020).
Naso, A. Frauen der Früheisenzeit. Weibliche Tracht und ethnische Identität auf der italischen Halbinsel am Beispiel der Cinturoni. Mitteilungen Deutschen Archäol. Inst. Römische Abteilung 126, 13–37 (2020).
Buikstra, J. E. & Ubelaker, D. H. Standards for Data Collection from Human Skeletal Remains (Archaeological Survey, 1994).
White, T. D., Black, M. T. & Folkens, P. A. Human Osteology (Elsevier Academic Press, 2012).
Cavazzuti, C., Bresadola, B., D’Innocenzo, C., Interlando, S. & Sperduti, A. Towards a new osteometric method for sexing ancient cremated human remains: analysis of Late Bronze Age and Iron Age samples from Italy with gendered grave goods. PLoS One 14, e0209423 (2019).
AlQahtani, S. J., Hector, M. P. & Liversidge, H. M. Brief communication: the London atlas of human tooth development and eruption. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 142, 481–490 (2010).
Scheuer, L. & Black, S. Developmental Juvenile Osteology (Academic Press, 2000).
Schaefer, M., Black, S. & Scheuer, L. Juvenile Osteology: A Laboratory and Field Manual (Academic Press, 2009).
Lovejoy, C. O. Dental wear in Libben population: its functional pattern and role in the determination of adult skeletal age at the death. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 68, 46–57 (1985).
Işcan, M. Y., Loth, S. R. & Wright, R. K. Age estimation from the rib by phase analysis: white females. J. Forensic Sci. 30, 853–863 (1985).
Işcan, M. Y., Loth, S. R. & Wright, R. K. Age estimation from the rib by phase analysis: white males. J. Forensic Sci. 29, 1094–1104 (1984).
Brooks, S. & Suchey, J. M. Skeletal age determination based on the os pubis: a comparison of the Acsádi-Nemeskéri and Suchey-Brooks methods. Hum. Evol. 5, 227–238 (1990).
Lovejoy, C. O., Meindl, R. S., Pryzbeck, T. R. & Mensforth, R. P. Chronological metamorphosis of the auricular surface of the ilium: a new method for the determination of adult skeletal age at death. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 68, 15–28 (1985).
14CHRONO Centre Laboratory 14C Pre-treatment Protocols. http://14chrono.org/site/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Lab_protocols.pdf (2019).
van Klinken, G. J. Bone collagen quality indicators for palaeodietary and radiocarbon measurements. J. Archaeol. Sci. 26, 687–695 (1999).
Ambrose, S. H. Preparation and characterization of bone and tooth collagen for isotopic analysis. J. Archaeol. Sci. 17, 431–451 (1990).
DeNiro, M. J. Postmortem preservation and alteration of in vivo bone collagen isotope ratios in relation to palaeodietary reconstruction. Nature 317, 806–809 (1985).
Müller, W., Fricke, H., Halliday, A. N., McCulloch, M. T. & Wartho, J. A. Origin and migration of the Alpine Iceman. Science 1979(302), 862–866 (2003).
Wright, L. E. Identifying immigrants to Tikal, Guatemala: defining local variability in strontium isotope ratios of human tooth enamel. J. Archaeol. Sci. 32, 555–566 (2005).
Sengeløv, A. et al. Understanding the post-Archaic population of Satricum, Italy: a bioarchaeological approach. J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep. 31, 102285 (2020).
Burton, J. H. & Hahn, R. Assessing the “local” 87Sr/86Sr ratio for humans. In Isotopic Landscapes in Bioarchaeology (eds Grupe, G. & McGlynn, G. C.) 113–121 (Springer, Heidelberg, 2016).
Harvig, L., Frei, K. M., Price, D. & Lynnerup, N. Strontium isotope signals in cremated petrous portions as indicator for childhood origin. PLoS One 9, e101603 (2014).
Czermak, A., Fernández-Crespo, T., Ditchfield, P. W. & Lee-Thorp, J. A. A guide for an anatomically sensitive dentine microsampling and age-alignment approach for human teeth isotopic sequences. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 173, 776–783 (2020).
Nava, A., Frayer, D. W. & Bondioli, L. Longitudinal analysis of the microscopic dental enamel defects of children in the Imperial Roman community of Portus Romae (necropolis of Isola Sacra, 2nd to 4th century CE, Italy). J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep. 23, 406–415 (2019).
Müller, W. & Anczkiewicz, R. Accuracy of laser-ablation (LA)-MC-ICPMS Sr isotope analysis of (bio)apatite—a problem reassessed. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 31, 259–269 (2016).
Olsen, J. et al. Characterisation and blind testing of radiocarbon dating of cremated bone. J. Archaeol. Sci. 35, 791–800 (2008).
R Core Team. In R: a language and environment for statistical computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2021).
Bergonzi, G. & Ritrecina, M. Origini: Vita e Morte Nella Prima Età del Ferro. La Necropoli Picena di Porto Sant’Elpidio (2009).
Acknowledgements
We thank Federica Grilli, Paola Mazzieri, and Giorgio Postrioti of the Soprintendenza Archeologia, Belle Arti e Paesaggio delle Marche and Nicoletta Frapiccini and Amanda Zanone of the Polo Museale delle Marche of the Italian Ministry of Culture for the permissions granted and the Museum of Civilizations in Rome for having supported the various phases of the research. We are grateful to Filippo Maria Gambari, former Director of the Museum of Civilizations, who sadly passed away in 2020. We would like to thank Jim McDonald, Julia Simpson and Michelle Thompson from the 14CHRONO Centre for Climate, the Environment, and Chronology. We would also like to thank Alexander Schmidt and Angela H. Helbing of the Frankfurt Isotope and Element Research Center (FIERCE). FIERCE is financially supported by the Wilhelm and Else Heraeus Foundation and by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG: INST 161/921-1 FUGG, INST 161/923-1 FUGG and INST 161/1073-1 FUGG), which is gratefully acknowledged. This is FIERCE contribution No. 120. We are grateful to Richard Madgwick for the valuable comments on the draft and to Kirsty Harding for assistance in the production of Figure 1. We would like to thank Naomi Imposimato who provided the analysis for 7 tombs from the Mossa necropolis and Piersante Iacopini for helping with baseline sampling in Fermo. This research was funded by the Northern Bridge Consortium (Doctoral Training Partnership) and funding for the 87Sr/86Sr analysis was also provided by Queen’s University Belfast Research Fund. During the writing of the article, the Corresponding author was partly funded by the AHSS International Research Strategy Working Group (IRSWG) of the University of Cambridge (PI Simon Stoddart).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualisation: C.E., C.M., L.B., S.S., M.P., W.M. Data curation: C.E., L.B.., W.M., P.M., M.G., A.S. Funding acquisition: C.E., C.M. Investigation: C.E., P.M., M.G., P.R., C.M., W.M. Methodology: C.E., P.R., WM. Project administration: C.E., C.M., P.R., W.M. Resources: W.M., P.R., M.P. Software: C.E., L.B., F.L. Supervision: C.M., P.R., W.M., L.B., M.P. Validation: W.M., P.R., C.M., L.B., M.P. Visualisation: CE, LB, FL. Writing-original draft: C.E., M.G., L.B., C.M., P.R. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Esposito, C., Gigante, M., Lugli, F. et al. Intense community dynamics in the pre-Roman frontier site of Fermo (ninth–fifth century BCE, Marche, central Italy) inferred from isotopic data . Sci Rep 13, 3632 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-29466-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-29466-3
This article is cited by
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.