Abstract
The sigma 2 receptor (σ2R) was recently identified as an endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane protein known as transmembrane protein 97 (TMEM97). Studies have shown that σ2R/TMEM97 binding compounds are neuroprotective, suggesting a role of σ2R/TMEM97 in neurodegenerative processes. To understand the function of σ2R/TMEM97 in neurodegeneration pathways, we characterized ischemia-induced retinal ganglion cell (RGC) degeneration in TMEM97−/− mice and found that RGCs in TMEM97−/− mice are resistant to degeneration. In addition, intravitreal injection of a selective σ2R/TMEM97 ligand DKR-1677 significantly protects RGCs from ischemia-induced degeneration in wildtype mice. Our results provide conclusive evidence that σ2R/TMEM97 plays a role to facilitate RGC death following ischemic injury and that inhibiting the function of σ2R/TMEM97 is neuroprotective. This work is a breakthrough toward elucidating the biology and function of σ2R/TMEM97 in RGCs and likely in other σ2R/TMEM97 expressing neurons. Moreover, these findings support future studies to develop new neuroprotective approaches for RGC degenerative diseases by inhibiting σ2R/TMEM97.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Sigma receptors were originally identified by radioactive ligand-binding assays as a subclass of opioid receptors1, but subsequent studies indicated that they were a distinct group of receptors with two members: the sigma-1 receptor (σ1R) and the sigma-2 receptor (σ2R)2,3,4,5. σ1R was cloned in 1996, and the protein sequence showed no homology to any other mammalian protein6. On the other hand, the molecular nature of σ2R remained elusive until 2017 when a membrane protein previously known as transmembrane protein 97 (TMEM97) was purified using a resin coupled with a high-affinity σ2R-binding ligand7. The ligand-binding properties of TMEM97 match those of the enigmatic σ2R, so σ2R was finally identified as TMEM977. The structure of σ2R/TMEM97 and its complexes with several ligands have been recently reported8, and 20(S)-hydroxycholesterol (20(S)-OHC) has been identified as an endogenous σ2R/TMEM97 ligand9.
The biological function of σ2R/TMEM97 is not well understood, but its wide distribution in the body, including the brain, the liver, pancreas, testis, and other organs10,11,12, implies that it may have distinct functions in different cells. σ2R/TMEM97 is known to regulate intracellular Ca2+ levels13 and to play a role in cholesterol trafficking and uptake14,15,16. The high expression of σ2R/TMEM97 in proliferating cancer cells makes it a biomarker and target for cancer diagnosis and therapy17,18,19,20,21,22,23. σ2R/TMEM97 is also involved in various neurological disorders24. Recent studies in animal models of Alzheimer's disease and traumatic brain injury demonstrate that small molecules binding selectively to σ2R/TMEM97 are neuroprotective25,26, suggesting that σ2R/TMEM97 is involved in pathways relevant to neurodegeneration.
Toward understanding the role of σ2R/TMEM97 in neurodegenerative processes, we characterized ischemia-induced retinal ganglion cell (RGC) degeneration in mice with or without σ2R/TMEM97 (i.e., TMEM97+/+or TMEM97−/− mice). Herein we report that in TMEM97−/− mice, the absence of σ2R/TMEM97 renders RGCs resistant to ischemia-induced cell death. Moreover, intravitreal injection of a selective, high-affinity σ2R/TMEM97 ligand DKR-1677 protects RGCs from ischemia damage in wildtype (TMEM97+/+) mice. These findings demonstrate that σ2R/TMEM97 facilitates RGC degeneration. Our present work is a breakthrough in understanding the biological function of σ2R/TMEM97 in neurodegenerative processes in RGCs and likely in other TMEM97 expressing neurons. Importantly, these results support the development of novel therapeutic approaches to prevent or slow the progression of RGC degeneration by inhibiting the function of σ2R/TMEM97.
Results
Retinas of TMEM97 −/− mice
TMEM97−/− mice are viable and fertile with no visible gross abnormalities. The retinal structure of a TMEM97−/− mouse (Fig. 1b) is indistinguishable from the retina of a wildtype (WT) animal (Fig. 1a). Scotopic and photopic ERGs (electroretinograms) from the TMEM97−/− mice (TM−/−, Fig. 1c,d, respectively) are similar to those from the wildtype mice (WT, Fig. 1e,f, respectively). In both TMEM97−/− mice and wildtype mice, scotopic b-waves were reliably recorded with flash intensity as low as − 4.4 log cd s/m2. The visual function of the TMEM97−/− mice was further assessed by measuring the visual acuity (VA) in an optomotor system27. The average VA of TMEM97−/− mice is 0.45 ± 0.024 cpd (cycle per degree, n = 4, Fig. S1), which is within the reported range of wildtype mice28.
In the retina of a wildtype mouse, σ2R/TMEM97 immunoreactivity was found in RGCs, the photoreceptor inner segments (IS), the RPE (retinal pigment epithelium), cells in the inner nuclear layer (INL), and sparsely in the outer nuclear layer (ONL) (Fig. 2a,b). No σ2R/TMEM97 immunoreactivity was detected in the retina of the TMEM97−/− mouse (Fig. S2).
The expression of TMEM97 in RGCs was also confirmed by X-gal staining in the TMEM97−/− mice. The TMEM97 gene in TMEM97−/− mice was replaced with a Velocigene cassette ZEN-Ub1 that has a lacZ reporter gene under the control of the TMEM97 promoter29, so the expression of the lacZ reporter correlates with TMEM97 expression. Blue X-gal staining is present in the RGCs as well as in the IS, the INL, the outer plexiform layer (OPL), the inner plexiform layer (IPL), the RPE, and sparsely in the ONL (Fig. 2c). In the RPE cells, the blue staining is mostly masked by the heavy melanin pigment in the 20 µm thick section (Fig. 2c).
The σ2R/TMEM97 distribution pattern in the wildtype mouse (Fig. 2a) and the X-gal staining pattern in the TMEM97−/− mouse overlap with each other, except in the IPL and OPL where σ2R/TMEM97 immunoreactivity is negative but blue X-gal stain is present. This discrepancy could be caused by differences in the subcellular localization of σ2R/TMEM97 and β-galactosidase because σ2R/TMEM97 is an ER membrane protein, but β-galactosidase is not.
The absence of TMEM97 expression in the retinas of TMEM97−/−mice was confirmed by reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR). Robust TMEM97 mRNA expression was found in the wildtype retinas (WT, Fig. 2d, Fig. S3), but no TMEM97 mRNA was detected in the retinas of TMEM97−/− mice (TM−/−, Fig. 2d, Fig. S3).
Ischemia-induced RGC degeneration in TMEM97 −/− mice
Retinal ischemia was induced by elevating the intraocular pressure (IOP) to 120 mm Hg for 45 min in the left eyes of both wildtype and TMEM97−/− mice. The right eyes were untouched and served as naïve controls. Eyes were collected seven days after ischemia, and RGCs were identified by immunostaining of the RGC marker RBPMS (RNA binding protein with multiple splicing)30. A significant loss of RGCs was observed in the left eyes of wildtype mice as compared to RGCs in the untouched right eye (Fig. 3a,b). In contrast, many RGCs are present in the left eyes of TMEM97−/− mice after retinal ischemia (Fig. 3d). For comparison, the retina of the naïve fellow eye from the same animal in Fig. 3d is shown in Fig. 3c. The RGC survival rate was calculated as the ratio of RBPMS-positive cells in the left eye vs those in the right eye in the same animal. In the TMEM97−/− mice, the average RGC survival rate is 0.59 ± 0.02 (n = 9), which is significantly higher than the average rate of 0.18 ± 0.01 (n = 8, P < 0.001) in the wildtype animals (Fig. 3e). These results demonstrate that RGCs in adult animals lacking σ2R/TMEM97 are resistant to ischemia-induced cell death.
The mean RGC density in the naïve eyes of the TMEM97−/− mice (271 ± 7/0.1 mm2, n = 9) is significantly lower than the average RGC density in the wildtype mice (366 ± 15/0.1 mm2, n = 8, P < 0.001). In contrast, the mean RGC density in eyes of TMEM97−/− mice after ischemia (157 ± 7/0.1 mm2, n = 9) is much higher than that in the eyes of wildtype animals after ischemia (65 ± 4/0.1 mm2, n = 8, P < 0.001). The lower RGC density in the naïve eyes of the TMEM97−/− mice is consistent with the lower baseline mean amplitude of PERG (pattern electroretinogram) from the naïve eyes in the TMEM97−/− mice (see below).
Pattern ERG measurement
PERG has been used as a sensitive measurement to assess the electrophysiological function of RGCs31. The PERG amplitude was measured peak-to-trough from the peak of the major positive wave at about 80 ms to the trough of the major negative component at about 300 ms. PERG latency was the time-to-peak of the major positive wave at about 80 ms. To monitor changes in RGC electrophysiological activities, we first recorded baseline PERG (Pre-IS) in wildtype and TMEM97−/− mice. The left eyes in each of these groups of animals were then subjected to ischemia, and the PERG was measured again seven days after ischemia (Post-IS).
In the retina of the wildtype mouse, ischemia markedly reduced PERG amplitude (Fig. 4a, Post-IS) as compared to the baseline (Fig. 4a, Pre-IS). No such change was observed in PERG amplitude following ischemia in the retina of the TMEM97−/− mouse (Fig. 4b, Pre-IS and Post-IS). A significant ischemia-induced decrease in mean PERG amplitude is seen in wildtype animals (Fig. 4c, WT ~ 60%, P < 0.001, n = 5), but not in the TMEM97−/− mice (Fig. 4c, TM−/−, n = 5). Ischemia-induced change in PERG amplitude in each animal was calculated as ∆Amp (Post-IS minus Pre-IS) to show that the average ∆Amp is significantly different from zero in the wildtype mice (P < 0.01, n = 5) (Fig. 4d, WT, n = 5). In contrast, the average ∆Amp in TMEM97−/− mice is not significantly different from zero (Fig. 4d, TM−/−, n = 5).
Retinal ischemia also induced an increase in PERG latency in the retina of the wildtype mouse (Fig. 4a), but not in the retina of the TMEM97−/− mouse (Fig. 4b). A significant increase in mean PERG latency (~ 20 ms, P < 0.01, n = 5) (Fig. 4e, WT, Post-IS) is observed in the wildtype mice as compared with the baseline (Fig. 4e WT, Per-IS), but there is no significant increase in mean PERG latency in TMEM97−/− mice (Fig. 4e, TM−/−, Per-IS and Post-IS). Ischemia-induced change in PERG latency in each animal was calculated as ∆Lat (Post-IS minus Per-IS) to show that the average ∆Lat in wildtype mice is significantly different from zero (P < 0.01, n = 5) (Fig. 4f), whereas the average ∆Lat in TMEM97−/− mice is not significantly different from zero (Fig. 4f, TM−/−, n = 5).
The baseline mean PERG amplitude in the TMEM97−/− mice (Fig. 4c, TM−/−, Pre-IS) is significantly lower (~ 30%, P < 0.01, n = 5) than that in wildtype mice (Fig. 4c, WT, Pre-IS), which is consistent with the lower RGC density in the TMEM97−/− mice.
Protection of RGCs by DKR-1677
The neuroprotective effect of a σ2R/TMEM97 ligand DKR-1677 on RGCs was examined in wildtype mice. DKR-1677 is a selective and high-affinity σ2R/TMEM97 ligand (Fig. 5h) that has been shown to be neuroprotective in two models of traumatic brain injury26. For intravitreal injections, DKR-1677 was dissolved in DMSO (dimethylsulfoxide) at concentrations of 2 µg/µL and 20 µg/µL. The left eyes were injected with 2 µL of either the low-dose (2 µg/µL) or the high-dose (20 µg/µL) formulation of DKR-1677. The vehicle control animals were injected with 2 µL DMSO into the left eyes. The right eyes of animals in the DKR-1677 and DMSO groups were not injected. Retinal ischemia was performed on the left (injected) eyes five days after injection, and the right eyes were untouched. RGC survival was assessed seven days after ischemia.
A significant loss of RGCs was seen in the left eyes in the vehicle group after ischemia, as compared with the untouched right eyes (Fig. 5a,b). Similar cell loss was found in the retina treated with low-dose DKR-1677 (DKR-L) as compared with the control right eye (Fig. 5c,d). In eyes injected with high-dose DKR-1677 (DKR-H), many surviving RGCs were present (Fig. 5e). For comparison, the retina of the naïve fellow eye from the same animal in Fig. 5f is shown in Fig. 5e. The average RGC survival rate in eyes treated with high-dose DKR-1677 (DKR-H, 0.59 ± 0.08, n = 5) is significantly higher than that in vehicle controls (DMSO, 0.27 ± 0.02, n = 5, P < 0.01) and eyes treated with low-dose DKR-1677 (DKR-L, 0.34 ± 0.03, n = 4, P < 0.01), respectively (Fig. 5g). The difference in RGC survival rate between the DKR-L and DMSO groups is not statistically significant (Fig. 5g).
The mean RGC densities in the naïve eyes of three groups (DMSO, 377 ± 15, n = 5; DKR-L, 360 ± 13, n = 4; DKR-H, 351 ± 55/0.1 mm2 n = 5) are not significantly different. On the other hand, the mean RGC density in eyes treated with high-dose of DKR-1677 and received ischemia (209 ± 18/0.1 mm2, n = 5) is significantly higher than that in the eyes subjected to ischemia in DMSO control animals (102 ± 18/0.1 mm2, n = 5, P < 0.01), or in the eyes treated with low-dose of DKR-1677 and received ischemia (123 ± 20/0.1 mm2, n = 4, P < 0.05). The difference in RGC densities between the DKR-L and DMSO groups is not statistically significant. The retinal overall structure showed no visible changes after injection of high-dose DKR-1677 (Fig. S4). These results demonstrate that the σ2R/TMEM97 ligand DKR-1677 protects RGCs against ischemia-induced cell death in a dose-dependent manner.
Discussion
A significant discovery of the present work is the loss-of-function phenotype in RGCs in the TMEM97−/− mice. When challenged by retinal ischemia, the RGCs in TMEM97−/− mice had significantly higher survival rates than the RGCs having fully functional σ2R/TMEM97 in wildtype mice. Moreover, electrophysiological activities of RGCs were much better maintained after ischemia in TMEM97−/− mice than in wildtype mice. These findings unequivocally demonstrate a role of σ2R/TMEM97 in the degenerative processes to facilitate ischemia-induced RGC degeneration. Another important finding is the neuroprotective effect of DKR-1677 against ischemia related RGC death in wildtype mice. The effect of DKR-1677 resembles the loss-of-function phenotype in RGCs in TMEM97−/− mice, indicating that the binding of DKR-1677 to σ2R/TMEM97 inhibits its function. Thus, the mechanism of action of DKR-1677, and perhaps other neuroprotective σ2R/TMEM97 ligands, is inhibiting the function of σ2R/TMEM97.
Selective σ2R/TMEM97-binding compounds have been reported to be neuroprotective in other studies. For example, DKR-1677, the σ2R/TMEM97 ligand used in the present work, has been shown to be neuroprotective in two models of traumatic brain injury26. Moreover, SAS-0132, a compound structurally similar to DKR-1677, was found to significantly improve cognitive performance in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease25. Furthermore, a σ2R/TMEM97-binding compound CT1812 is in clinical trials for treating Alzheimer's disease32.
Intriguingly, the mean RGC density in the TMEM97−/− mice is lower than that in the wildtype mice. It is known that in early development of the retina, excessive RGCs are generated, and many undergo programmed cell death before the final number of RGCs is reached33,34. The lower RGC density in the TMEM97−/− mice is evidence that σ2R/TMEM97 is perhaps involved in the mechanism to determine the final RGC numbers during retinal development. This finding has important implications, and future studies will elucidate the role of σ2R/TMEM97 in regulating RGC numbers during early development.
RGCs express both σ1R and σ2R/TMEM97. σ1R has been shown to promote RGC survival35, and genetic ablation of σ1R in mice leads to an age-related inner retinal dysfunction and loss of RGCs36. σ1R agonists have also been shown to protect RGC35,37. We show herein that σ2R/TMEM97 facilitates RGC degeneration. It seems that the two receptors play opposite roles in RGC degeneration. The question remains as to whether σ1R and σ2R/TMEM97 interact with each other to regulate RGC degeneration.
The biological functions of σ2R/TMEM97 are not well understood, although σ2R/TMEM97 is known to be involved in regulating cellular Ca2+ levels13 and controlling cellular cholesterol levels14,15,16. It has long been recognized that treating cells with σ2R/TMEM97 ligands induces a biphasic increase in cytosolic Ca2+ levels13, indicating that σ2R/TMEM97 signaling could be mediated by intracellular Ca2+ levels. σ2R/TMEM97 is also known to regulate cellular cholesterol by controlling cholesterol trafficking from lysosomes to the ER and cholesterol uptake14,15,16. For example, a trimeric complex of σ2R/TMEM97, the progesterone membrane component 1 (PGRMC1), and the low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor has been shown to regulate cholesterol levels in cells by internalizing LDL16. A recent study identified 20(S)-OHC as an endogenous σ2R/TMEM97 ligand9. 20(S)-OHC binding to σ2R/TMEM97 significantly enhances the interaction between σ2R/TMEM97 and NPC1 (NPC intracellular cholesterol transporter 1), providing evidence that 20(S)-OHC regulate cholesterol trafficking from lysosomes to the ER9.
σ2R/TMEM97 is shown to be associated with several neurological disorders, including anxiety, depression, and addiction24. In animal models, σ2R/TMEM97 binding compounds are known to mitigate alcohol withdrawal symptoms38,39 and the effects of cocaine40, as well as to induce long-lasting relief of neuropathic pain41. A potential role of σ2R/TMEM97 in oxidative damage to RPE cells has been reported in two papers, but the results are contradictory42,43. Further studies could clarify the potential role of σ2R/TMEM97 in oxidative damage in RPE cells.
Our finding that inhibiting σ2R/TMEM97 protects RGCs could have specific clinical relevance. RGCs are output neurons that process and convey visual information from the retina to the visual cortex44. Several clinical conditions, including glaucoma, ischemic optic neuropathies, hereditary optic neuropathies, and demyelinating disease, lead to RGC death, optic nerve damage, and blindness45,46,47. Glaucoma is a heterogeneous group of optic neuropathies characterized by RGC degeneration and a leading cause of irreversible vision loss48,49,50,51. A promising therapeutic strategy for treating glaucoma is to protect RGCs46,52. The present work provides strong experimental data supporting a new neuroprotective approach for RGCs by inhibiting σ2R/TMEM97. Small molecules like synthetic σ2R/TMEM97 ligands have the advantage over biological agents of being able to penetrate the blood-retinal barrier. Accordingly, they are excellent candidates for the development of neuroprotective agents for treating glaucoma and other degenerative retinal diseases.
In summary, the present work is a breakthrough toward elucidating the function of σ2R/TMEM97 in RGCs and other σ2R/TMEM97 expressing neurons. We show that σ2R/TMEM97 facilitates RGC degeneration and that inhibiting σ2R/TMEM97 function is neuroprotective. This work also provides persuasive experimental support for a new therapeutic strategy to protect RGCs and other neurons in neurodegenerative diseases by inhibiting σ2R/TMEM97.
Methods
Ethics statement
All procedures involving animals complied with the ARRIVE (Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments) guidelines and adhered to the ARVO (Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology) Statement for the Use of Animals in Ophthalmic and Vision Research, and were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine.
Animals
Wildtype mice (C57Bl/6) were purchased from Jackson Labs (Bar Harbor, ME). TMEM97−/− mice (Tmem97tm1(KOMP)Vlcg, stock # 050147-UCD) were obtained from the Mutant Mouse Resource & Research Centers (MMRRC, https://www.mmrrc.org/), backcrossed and maintained on a C57BL/6 background. Genotypes were confirmed by PCR according to MMRRC instructions. Animals were kept on a 12:12 light–dark cycle. Adult male mice (2–3 months old) were used in all experiments.
Histology
For retinal histology, animals were killed by CO2 overdose and immediately followed by vascular perfusion with mixed aldehydes53,54. Eyes were collected and embedded in an Epon/Araldite mixture. Semi-thin sections (1 µm) were cut to display the entire retina along the vertical meridian53,54. Retinal sections were stained with toluidine blue and examined by light microscopy.
ERG recording
ERGs were recorded with an UTAS system (LKC Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD). Animals were anesthetized with intraperitoneal ketamine/xylazine (80/10 mg/kg). Pupils were dilated with 0.1% atropine and 0.1% phenylephrine HCl. During recording, animals were maintained at 37 °C on a heating pad. A contact lens electrode was placed on the cornea, a reference electrode under the skin of the forehead, and a ground wire electrode was placed under the skin close to the base of the tail. ERGs were elicited by 1 ms white flashes in the Ganzfeld sphere. Animals were dark adapted for > 3 h before scotopic ERG recording. Photopic ERG responses were recorded with a low white background illumination (30 cd s/m2). Inter-stimulus intervals were 10 s. Each recording was an average of 5 responses.
Optomotor response measurement
Visual acuities were assessed with an optomotor system (OptoMotryAT, Cerebral Mechanics, Lethbride, Alberta, Canada) by observing optomotor responses of the animal to rotating sinusoidal gratings27. An animal was placed on the platform and tested by a staircase protocol with an initial spatial frequency of 0.1 cpd and 0.05 cpd step size at 100% contrast and a drift speed of 12.0 degree/sec. The test protocol was controlled by OptoMotryAT software (version 3.0.4.). The highest spatial frequency that a mouse could respond to was taken as the visual threshold or visual acuity of that mouse.
Immunocytochemistry
For TMEM97 immunostaining, animals were killed by CO2 overdose. Eyes were removed after vascular perfusion with 4% paraformaldehyde, cryoprotected with 20% sucrose, and embedded in Tissue-Tek OCT compound (Miles Inc., Elkhart, IN). Sections (10 µm) along the vertical meridian were cut on a Cryostat at − 20 °C and thaw-mounted onto Super Frost Plus glass slides (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA). Retinal sections were incubated with anti-TMEM97 antibodies (PA5-23003, Thermo Fisher Scientific Technology, Waltham, MA) at 4 °C overnight. TMEM97 immunoreactivity was visualized by staining with Cy2 conjugated secondary antibodies (Jackson ImmunoResearch Labs, West Grove, PA) for 1 h at room temperature (RT). Cell nuclei were stained with DAPI (4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole). Fluorescent signals in the retinal sections were examined by confocal microscopy (LSM700; Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany).
X-gal stain in the retina
TMEM97−/− mice were generated by replacing 8169 base pairs of the TMEM97 gene in chromosome 11 (positions 78,355,984–78,364,152) with a Velocigene cassette ZEN-Ub1 that has a lacZ reporter gene under the control of the TMEM97 promoter (https://www.mmrrc.org/catalog/sds.php?mmrrc_id=50147)29. The expression of lacZ (encoding β-galactosidase) thus correlates with the expression of TMEM97 and the enzymatic activity of β-galactosidase can be detected by X-gal staining. For X-gal staining in the retinas of TMEM97−/− mice, eyes were collected and fixed in 2% paraformaldehyde and 0.2% glutaraldehyde. Retinal cryo-sections (20 µm) were cut and stained with a phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 0.5 mg/mL X-gal (5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl β-D-galactopyranoside), 5 mM potassium ferricyanide, 5 mM potassium ferrocyanide, 2 mM MgCl2, 0.01% sodium deoxycholate, and 0.02% Nonidet P-40 (NP-40) at 37 °C overnight. Stained retinal sections were examined by DIC (differential interference contrast) microscopy.
TMEM97 RNA expression
TMEM97 mRNA expression in wildtype and TMEM97−/− mice was examined by reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR). Total RNA was extracted from four retinas of TMEM97−/− or wildtype mice with the RNeasy kit (Qiagen, Germantown, MD). cDNA was synthesized using 2 µg total RNA as the template and poly d(T) (deoxythymidine) primer with the ProtoScript II cDNA synthesis kit in a 20 µL reaction (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA). TMEM97 expression was examined by PCR with forward primer 5’-TCTACTTCGTCTCGCACATCCC-3’ and reverse primer 5’-CCGGCAGCTTCCTTTGAAGAAGG-3’. The expression of the housekeeping gene Gapdh (Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, forward primer 5’-AGGTTGTCTCCTGCGACTTC-3’ and reverse primer 5’-GGGTGGTCCAGGGTTTCTTAC-3’) was used as a reference. PCR was carried out using 2 µL cDNA reaction as the template with OneTaq DNA polymerase (New England Biolabs). The total volume of PCR reaction (30 µL) was electrophoresed on a 2% agarose gel and PCR products were visualized by ethidium bromide staining.
Retinal ischemia
Retinal ischemia was induced by elevating the intraocular pressure (IOP) to 120 mm Hg. An animal was anesthetized with isoflurane through a nose cone and body temperature was kept at 37 °C with a heating pad. The anterior chamber of the left eye was cannulated with a 33-gauge needle connected to a reservoir of saline (0.9% NaCl) via a valve. The reservoir was placed at 163 cm above the eye to create a pressure of 163 cm H2O (equivalent to 120 mm Hg). IOP was elevated to 120 mm Hg (163 cm H2O) by turning the valve to connect the needle to the reservoir. Ischemia was visually confirmed as the eye turned pale. Elevated IOP was maintained for 45 min, whereupon perfusion to the eye was resumed by turning the valve off to disconnect the needle from the reservoir followed by needle withdrawal.
Quantification of RGC survival
RGCs were identified by immunostaining of RBPMS30. Eyes were collected seven days after ischemia. The anterior segment of each eye was removed, and the eyecup was incubated with anti-RBPMS antibodies (GTX118619, GeneTex, Irvine, CA) at 4 °C overnight. The eyecup was then washed and stained with Cy2 conjugated secondary antibodies (Jackson ImmunoResearch Labs) for 1 h at RT to visualize RBPMS immunoreactivity. After staining, the retina was cut into four quadrants (superior, inferior, nasal, and temporal), flat-mounted onto glass slides, and examined by confocal microscopy (LSM700; Carl Zeiss).
RBPMS positive cells in each quadrant were counted in five fields (319 × 319 µm each) at 0.5 mm (1 field), 1 mm (2 fields), and 1.5 mm (2 fields) from the optic nerve head, and RGC densities were calculated. RGC survival rate is the ratio of RBPMS positive cells in the left eye vs those in the right eye.
Pattern electroretinogram (PERG) recording
PERG was recorded as previously described55,56. Mice were anesthetized with ketamine/xylazine (80/10 mg/kg) and gently restrained in an animal holder. Animals were kept at a constant body temperature of 37 °C using a feedback-controlled heating pad (TCAT-2LV; Physitemp Instruments, Inc. Clifton, NJ). Pupils were undilated and small (< 1 mm) to ensure a large depth of focus. PERG was recorded with a JÖRVEC system (JÖRVEC, Miami, FL) using a stainless-steel subcutaneous needle electrode (Grass, West Warwick, RI) placed in the snout. The reference and ground electrodes were identical needles placed in the medial portion of the scalp and at the root of the tail, respectively. Visual stimuli were contrast-reversing bars (0.05 cycles/deg, 98% contrast, 800 cd/m2 mean luminance) generated on a light-emitting diode tablet (15 × 15 cm size) and presented to the eye at a 10 cm distance. PERG responses were analyzed by automated detection of the main positive peak (P1) at about 80 ms, and the subsequent negative trough (N2) at about 300 ms. PERG amplitude was defined as the amplitude difference between the P1 peak and the N2 trough. PERG latency was defined as the time-to-peak of the major positive wave at about 80 ms.
Intravitreal injections
The selective σ2R/TMEM97 ligand DKR-1677 was prepared as previously described57 and dissolved in DMSO at two concentrations of 2 µg/µL and 20 µg/µL. A 33-gauge needle connected to a 10-µL microsyringe (Hamilton, Reno, NV) was used for intravitreal injections as described58. The left eye of a mouse was injected with 2 µL of DKR-1677 (2 µg/µL or 20 µg/µL) and the right eyes received no injection. In the vehicle controls, the left eyes were injected with 2 µL DMSO, and the right eyes were not injected.
Statistics
Data are presented as mean ± standard error of mean (SEM). The statistical significance of the difference between two groups of data was determined by Student’s t test. The significance of the differences among three groups of data were determined by ANOVA (analysis of variance) with post-hoc Tukey test.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding authors on reasonable request.
References
Martin, W. R., Eades, C. G., Thompson, J. A., Huppler, R. E. & Gilbert, P. E. The effects of morphine- and nalorphine- like drugs in the nondependent and morphine-dependent chronic spinal dog. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 197, 517–532 (1976).
Quirion, R. et al. A proposal for the classification of sigma binding sites. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 13, 85–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-6147(92)90030-a (1992).
Matsumoto, R. R. In Sigma Receptors (eds Su, T. P. et al.) (Springer, 2007).
Su, T. P. Evidence for sigma opioid receptor: Binding of [3H]SKF-10047 to etorphine-inaccessible sites in guinea-pig brain. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 223, 284–290 (1982).
Hellewell, S. B. & Bowen, W. D. A sigma-like binding site in rat pheochromocytoma (PC12) cells: Decreased affinity for (+)-benzomorphans and lower molecular weight suggest a different sigma receptor form from that of guinea pig brain. Brain Res. 527, 244–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(90)91143-5 (1990).
Hanner, M. et al. Purification, molecular cloning, and expression of the mammalian sigma1-binding site. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93, 8072–8077. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.93.15.8072 (1996).
Alon, A. et al. Identification of the gene that codes for the sigma2 receptor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 114, 7160–7165. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1705154114 (2017).
Alon, A. et al. Structures of the sigma2 receptor enable docking for bioactive ligand discovery. Nature 600, 759–764. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-04175-x (2021).
Cheng, Y. S. et al. A proteome-wide map of 20(S)-hydroxycholesterol interactors in cell membranes. Nat. Chem. Biol. 17, 1271–1280. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41589-021-00907-2 (2021).
Kayed, H. et al. Expression analysis of MAC30 in human pancreatic cancer and tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. Histol. Histopathol. 19, 1021–1031. https://doi.org/10.14670/HH-19.1021 (2004).
Fagerberg, L. et al. Analysis of the human tissue-specific expression by genome-wide integration of transcriptomics and antibody-based proteomics. Mol. Cell Proteom. 13, 397–406. https://doi.org/10.1074/mcp.M113.035600 (2014).
Bouchard, P. & Quirion, R. [3H]1,3-di(2-tolyl)guanidine and [3H](+)pentazocine binding sites in the rat brain: Autoradiographic visualization of the putative sigma1 and sigma2 receptor subtypes. Neuroscience 76, 467–477. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0306-4522(96)00221-7 (1997).
Vilner, B. J. & Bowen, W. D. Modulation of cellular calcium by sigma-2 receptors: Release from intracellular stores in human SK-N-SH neuroblastoma cells. J Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 292, 900–911 (2000).
Bartz, F. et al. Identification of cholesterol-regulating genes by targeted RNAi screening. Cell Metab. 10, 63–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2009.05.009 (2009).
Ebrahimi-Fakhari, D. et al. Reduction of TMEM97 increases NPC1 protein levels and restores cholesterol trafficking in Niemann-pick type C1 disease cells. Hum. Mol. Genet. 25, 3588–3599. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddw204 (2016).
Riad, A. et al. Sigma-2 receptor/TMEM97 and PGRMC-1 increase the rate of internalization of LDL by LDL receptor through the formation of a ternary complex. Sci. Rep. 8, 16845. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-35430-3 (2018).
Wheeler, K. T. et al. Sigma-2 receptors as a biomarker of proliferation in solid tumours. Br. J. Cancer 82, 1223–1232. https://doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.1999.1067 (2000).
van Waarde, A. et al. Sigma receptors in oncology: Therapeutic and diagnostic applications of sigma ligands. Curr. Pharm. Des. 16, 3519–3537. https://doi.org/10.2174/138161210793563365 (2010).
Mach, R. H., Zeng, C. & Hawkins, W. G. The sigma2 receptor: A novel protein for the imaging and treatment of cancer. J. Med. Chem. 56, 7137–7160. https://doi.org/10.1021/jm301545c (2013).
Schmit, K. & Michiels, C. TMEM proteins in cancer: A review. Front. Pharmacol. 9, 1345. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2018.01345 (2018).
Fallica, A. N. et al. Recent advances in the development of sigma receptor ligands as cytotoxic agents: A medicinal chemistry perspective. J. Med. Chem. 64, 7926–7962. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.0c02265 (2021).
Zeng, C., Riad, A. & Mach, R. H. The biological function of sigma-2 receptor/TMEM97 and its utility in PET imaging studies in cancer. Cancers 12, 1877. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12071877 (2020).
Mach, R. H. et al. Sigma 2 receptors as potential biomarkers of proliferation in breast cancer. Cancer Res. 57, 156–161 (1997).
Guo, L. & Zhen, X. Sigma-2 receptor ligands: Neurobiological effects. Curr. Med. Chem. 22, 989–1003. https://doi.org/10.2174/0929867322666150114163607 (2015).
Yi, B. et al. Small molecule modulator of sigma 2 receptor is neuroprotective and reduces cognitive deficits and neuroinflammation in experimental models of Alzheimer’s disease. J. Neurochem. 140, 561–575. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnc.13917 (2017).
Vazquez-Rosa, E. et al. Neuroprotective efficacy of a sigma 2 receptor/tmem97 modulator (DKR-1677) after traumatic brain injury. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 10, 1595–1602. https://doi.org/10.1021/acschemneuro.8b00543 (2019).
Prusky, G. T., Alam, N. M., Beekman, S. & Douglas, R. M. Rapid quantification of adult and developing mouse spatial vision using a virtual optomotor system. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 45, 4611–4616. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.04-0541 (2004).
Shi, C. et al. Optimization of optomotor response-based visual function assessment in mice. Sci. Rep. 8, 9708. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-27329-w (2018).
Valenzuela, D. M. et al. High-throughput engineering of the mouse genome coupled with high-resolution expression analysis. Nat. Biotechnol. 21, 652–659. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt822 (2003).
Rodriguez, A. R., de Sevilla Muller, L. P. & Brecha, N. C. The RNA binding protein RBPMS is a selective marker of ganglion cells in the mammalian retina. J. Comp. Neurol. 522, 1411–1443. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.23521 (2014).
Porciatti, V. Electrophysiological assessment of retinal ganglion cell function. Exp. Eye Res. 141, 164–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exer.2015.05.008 (2015).
Grundman, M. et al. A phase 1 clinical trial of the sigma-2 receptor complex allosteric antagonist CT1812, a novel therapeutic candidate for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. (N Y) 5, 20–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trci.2018.11.001 (2019).
Isenmann, S., Kretz, A. & Cellerino, A. Molecular determinants of retinal ganglion cell development, survival, and regeneration. Prog. Retina Eye Res. 22, 483–543. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1350-9462(03)00027-2 (2003).
Beros, J., Rodger, J. & Harvey, A. R. Developmental retinal ganglion cell death and retinotopicity of the murine retinocollicular projection. Dev. Neurobiol. 78, 51–60. https://doi.org/10.1002/dneu.22559 (2018).
Smith, S. B. et al. Sigma 1 receptor: A novel therapeutic target in retinal disease. Prog. Retina Eye Res. 67, 130–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2018.07.003 (2018).
Ha, Y. et al. Late-onset inner retinal dysfunction in mice lacking sigma receptor 1 (sigmaR1). Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 52, 7749–7760. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.11-8169 (2011).
Geva, M. et al. Neuroprotection of retinal ganglion cells by the sigma-1 receptor agonist pridopidine in models of experimental glaucoma. Sci. Rep. 11, 21975. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-01077-w (2021).
Scott, L. L. et al. Small molecule modulators of sigma2R/Tmem97 reduce alcohol withdrawal-induced behaviors. Neuropsychopharmacology 43, 1867–1875. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-018-0067-z (2018).
Quadir, S. G. et al. The Sigma-2 receptor / transmembrane protein 97 (sigma2R/TMEM97) modulator JVW-1034 reduces heavy alcohol drinking and associated pain states in male mice. Neuropharmacology 184, 108409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropharm.2020.108409 (2021).
Lever, J. R. et al. A selective sigma-2 receptor ligand antagonizes cocaine-induced hyperlocomotion in mice. Synapse 68, 73–84. https://doi.org/10.1002/syn.21717 (2014).
Sahn, J. J., Mejia, G. L., Ray, P. R., Martin, S. F. & Price, T. J. Sigma 2 receptor/Tmem97 agonists produce long lasting antineuropathic pain effects in mice. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 8, 1801–1811. https://doi.org/10.1021/acschemneuro.7b00200 (2017).
Wang, J.-H. et al. Functional study of the AMD-associated gene TMEM97 in retinal pigmented epithelium using CRISPR interference. bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.10.198143 (2020).
Shen, H. et al. TMEM97 ablation aggravates oxidant-induced retinal degeneration. Cell Signal 86, 110078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cellsig.2021.110078 (2021).
Nelson, R. In Webvision: The Organization of the Retina and Visual System (eds Kolb, H. et al.) (Moran Eye Center, 1995).
Osborne, N. N. et al. Retinal ischemia: Mechanisms of damage and potential therapeutic strategies. Prog. Retina Eye Res. 23, 91–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2003.12.001 (2004).
Khatib, T. Z. & Martin, K. R. Protecting retinal ganglion cells. Eye (Lond.) 31, 218–224. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2016.299 (2017).
Carelli, V., La Morgia, C., Ross-Cisneros, F. N. & Sadun, A. A. Optic neuropathies: The tip of the neurodegeneration iceberg. Hum. Mol. Genet. 26, R139–R150. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddx273 (2017).
Krizaj, D. In Webvision (eds Kolb, H. et al.) (Moran Eye Center, 1995).
Foster, P. J., Buhrmann, R., Quigley, H. A. & Johnson, G. J. The definition and classification of glaucoma in prevalence surveys. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 86, 238–242. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.86.2.238 (2002).
Jonas, J. B. et al. Glaucoma. Lancet 390, 2183–2193. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31469-1 (2017).
Nickells, R. W., Howell, G. R., Soto, I. & John, S. W. Under pressure: Cellular and molecular responses during glaucoma, a common neurodegeneration with axonopathy. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 35, 153–179. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.051508.135728 (2012).
Boia, R. et al. Neuroprotective strategies for retinal ganglion cell degeneration: Current status and challenges ahead. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21, 2262. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21072262 (2020).
LaVail, M. M. & Battelle, B. A. Influence of eye pigmentation and light deprivation on inherited retinal dystrophy in the rat. Exp. Eye Res. 21, 167–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-4835(75)90080-9 (1975).
Song, Y. et al. Photoreceptor protection by cardiotrophin-1 in transgenic rats with the rhodopsin mutation s334ter. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 44, 4069–4075 (2003).
Chou, T. H., Bohorquez, J., Toft-Nielsen, J., Ozdamar, O. & Porciatti, V. Robust mouse pattern electroretinograms derived simultaneously from each eye using a common snout electrode. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 55, 2469–2475. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.14-13943 (2014).
Amato, R. et al. Diabetes exacerbates the intraocular pressure-independent retinal ganglion cells degeneration in the DBA/2J model of glaucoma. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 62, 9. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.62.9.9 (2021).
Sahn, J. J., Hodges, T. R., Chan, J. Z. & Martin, S. F. Norbenzomorphan scaffold: Chemical tool for modulating sigma receptor-subtype selectivity. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 8, 455–460. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsmedchemlett.7b00066 (2017).
Wen, R. et al. Regulation of rod phototransduction machinery by ciliary neurotrophic factor. J. Neurosci. 26, 13523–13530. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4021-06.2006 (2006).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by NIH grants R01EY023666 (RW), R01EY026643 (SJ), R01EY031492 (SJ); NIH Core Grant P30EY14801 (to the Bascom Palmer Eye Institute); NS098740 (DJL), NS120028 (DJL); a grant from Hope for Vision (RW); an unrestricted grant from Research to Prevent Blindness, Inc. to the Bascom Palmer Eye Institute; and support from the Miami Project to Cure Paralysis. It was also supported by the Robert A. Welch Foundation (F-0652) and the Dell Medical School’s Texas Health Catalyst program. Determinations of receptor binding profiles for DKR-1677 were generously provided by the Psychoactive Drug Screening Program (PDSP) of the US National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) (contract # HHSN-271-2013-00017-C). The NIMH-PDSP is Directed by Bryan L. Roth, MD, PhD at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and Project Officer Jamie Driscoll at NIMH, Bethesda MD, USA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Y.L., V.P., D.J.L., S.F.M., and R.W. conceived and designed the project; H.W., Z.P., Y.L., J.J.S., T.R.H., T.H.C., Q.L., X.Z., and R.W. conducted the experiments. H.W., Z.P., Y.L., T.H.C., V.P., S.J., and R.W. analyzed data. Y.L., V.P., S.J., D.J.L., S.F.M., and R.W. wrote the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare the following competing financial interest(s): S.F.M., J.J.S., and T.R.H. are co-inventors of pending patent applications related to the work described in this article. S.F.M. and J.J.S. are cofounders of NuvoNuro, Inc. H.W., Z.P., Y.L., T.H.C., Q.L., X.Z., S.J., V.P., D.J.L., and R.W. do not have any competing interests to declare.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, H., Peng, Z., Li, Y. et al. σ2R/TMEM97 in retinal ganglion cell degeneration. Sci Rep 12, 20753 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-24537-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-24537-3
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.