Abstract
The development of new biopesticides to control the western corn rootworm (WCR), Diabrotica virgifera virgifera LeConte, is urgent due to resistance evolution to various control methods. We tested an air-dried non-live preparation of Chromobacterium species Panama (Csp_P), against multiple corn rootworm species, including Bt-resistant and -susceptible WCR strains, northern (NCR, D. barberi Smith & Lawrence), and southern corn rootworm (SCR, D. undecimpunctata howardi Barber), in diet toxicity assays. Our results documented that Csp_P was toxic to all three corn rootworms species based on lethal (LC50), effective (EC50), and molt inhibition concentration (MIC50). In general, toxicity of Csp_P was similar among all WCR strains and ~ 3-fold less toxic to NCR and SCR strains. Effective concentration (EC50) was also similar among WCR and SCR strains, and 5-7-fold higher in NCR strains. Molt inhibition (MIC50) was similar among all corn rootworm strains except NCR diapause strain that was 2.5–6-fold higher when compared to all other strains. There was no apparent cross-resistance between Csp_P and any of the currently available Bt proteins. Our results indicate that Csp_P formulation was effective at killing multiple corn rootworm strains including Bt-resistant WCR and could be developed as a potential new management tool for WCR control.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The western corn rootworm (WCR), Diabrotica virgifera virgifera LeConte, and the northern corn rootworm (NCR), Diabrotica barberi Smith & Lawrence, are the most devastating maize pests in the U. S. Corn Belt1,2,3,4, causing yield losses and control costs of up to $2 billion per year5. The southern corn rootworm (SCR), Diabrotica undecimpunctata howardi Barber, is a multivoltine and polyphagous pest that feeds on several crops including maize, whereas WCR and NCR are univoltine and feed almost exclusively on maize1. Corn rootworm larvae cause significant damage to the maize roots compromising the uptake of water and nutrients, as well as plant stability in heavy infestations1,6,7. Although SCR beetles can migrate northward, they usually do not overwinter in most parts of the Corn Belt; thus, damage by SCR larvae is typically not a concern in those areas.
WCR and NCR management tactics rely on crop rotation primarily with soybeans and maize hybrids expressing Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) proteins. The extraordinary ability to rapidly evolve resistance to management tactics has made corn rootworms one of the most challenging maize pests in North America. Recent cases of resistance evolution to Bt maize hybrids in both species8,9,11,12,13,14 and to RNA interference (RNAi) in WCR15 have highlighted the urgent need for insecticides with new modes of action that do not confer cross-resistance to current control methods including Bt and RNAi16.
Bacterial insecticidal proteins have been used against insect pests for many years, especially lepidopteran, coleopteran, and dipteran pests, with Bt being the most widely used17,18. New insecticidal proteins produced by soil bacteria other than Bt such as Photorhabdus luminescens19, Chromobacterium piscinae20,21, Pseudomonas chlororaphis and P. mosselii22,23,24,25, Alkaligenes faecalis26,27 and Brevibacillus laterosporus26,28, and even those produced by mushrooms from the genus Pleurotus29 have been explored as future venues for corn rootworm management and resistance management18. In addition, recent studies have documented the toxicity of modified or engineered Bt proteins such as Cry6Aa130, CytAa31, Cry8Hb32, and the first vegetative insecticidal protein Vpb4Da233,34 against WCR larvae. Finding new molecules with distinct modes of action without cross-resistance to current technologies should be the goal for corn rootworm discovery programs, given the pest’s ability to evolve resistance to multiple control tactics35,36,37,38,39, with possible multiple resistance mechanisms9,13,14,40.
Chromobacterium is a Gram-negative soil bacterium that produces insecticidal metabolites documented to be toxic not only to mosquitoes41,42, but also to WCR larvae20. The Chromobacterium species Panama (Betaproteobacteria: Neisseriaceae), referred to Csp_P from hereafter, was isolated from mosquito vectors Aedes aegypti midguts, which were collected in dengue-endemic areas in Panama41,42. Csp_P has been demonstrated to have high insecticidal activity against the larvae from three mosquito vector species42,43. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the susceptibility of multiple WCR strains including Bt-resistant, -susceptible and diapause strains, diapause and non-diapause NCR strains, and an SCR strain, to an air-dried non-live preparation of the Csp_P. In 7-d diet overlay toxicity assays, we estimated the lethal concentration (LC50) based on survival data, the effective concentration (EC50) based on dry weight of surviving larvae, and the molt inhibition concentration (MIC50) based on the number of larvae reaching second instar. Our results indicated that Csp_P was effective at killing multiple corn rootworm strains including WCR larvae resistant to Bt toxins.
Results
Diet assays
After 7 d, the highest concentration of the Csp_P preparation used in the assays (40 µg/cm2 for WCR, 160 µg/cm2 for NCR, and 320 µg/cm2 for SCR) killed between 78 and 92% of the WCR larvae across strains (Fig. 1), 100% of the NCR larvae and 90% of the SCR larvae (Fig. 2). The LC50 values ranged from 12.9 µg/cm2 (WCR Texas) to 61.1 µg/cm2 (NCR diapause and non-diapause) (Table 1), the EC50 values ranged from 1.30 µg/cm2 (WCR eCry3-R and Texas) to ~ 10 µg/cm2 (NCR diapause and non-diapause) (Table 1), and the MIC50 values ranged from < 1.25 µg/cm2 (WCR Texas) to 8.46 µg/cm2 (NCR diapause) (Table 1). The WCR eCry-R strain exhibited the highest LC50 among all but WCR mCry3A-R strain, with no overlapping 95% confidence intervals (C.I.), whereas WCR Texas exhibited the lowest LC50 and MIC50 values of all the strains (Table 1). The EC50 values were similar among all WCR strains (except for WCR Texas) as were MIC50 (Table 1). The NCR strains exhibited the highest LC50, EC50, and MIC50 values, that ranged from 2-fold to 18-fold higher than the WCR strains (Table 1). The SCR strain exhibited higher LC50, similar EC50, and similar MIC50 values than all the WCR strains, except WCR Texas (Table 1).
Histologic pathogenesis
Normal gut ultrastructure was observed in the WCR feeding for 72 h on a diet supplemented with sucrose alone (Fig. 3A). Columnar cells with an intact brush border membrane lined with microvilli surrounded the gut lumen. However, 72 h of feeding on Csp_P significantly affected the gut structure (Fig. 3B). In the treated insects, the microvilli on the apical side of the gut lumen were dissolved. The columnar cells were multilayered as evidenced by cell nuclei along the posterior portion of the midgut. Stem cells could be seen in high numbers toward the anterior portion of the midgut. A dark purple staining observed in the gut lumen of the treated insects may have been commensal bacterial (e.g. bacilli) altered due to the infection by Csp_P.
Discussion
In the present study, we have used diet overlay toxicity assays to evaluate and demonstrate the toxicity of a Csp_P formulation against Bt-resistant and susceptible WCR strains, diapause and non-diapause NCR strains, and an SCR strain. We found no evidence of cross-resistance with the WCR Bt-resistant strains, especially with the Cry3Bb1 and Gpp34/Tpp35Ab1 proteins (Table 1; Fig. 1). Cross-resistance between Cry3Bb1, eCry3.1Ab and mCry3A proteins, but not to Gpp34/Tpp35Ab1, has been reported previously9,10,14,44,45,46,47. The WCR continues to be a challenging maize pest given the recent cases of Bt resistance evolution to Cry3Bb1 and Gpp34/Tpp35Ab1 maize hybrids in North Dakota13, Iowa9, and Nebraska14. In addition, Calles-Torrez et al.13 have reported the first case of NCR field-evolved resistance to Bt maize. The EPA has implemented a framework to delay resistance evolution in rootworms48. Therefore, in those areas where the WCR have evolved complete or incomplete resistance to Cry3Bb110,13,47,49,50 or to Gpp34/Tpp35Ab18,9,11,13,14, the pyramided maize expressing both Cry3Bb1 and Gpp34/Tpp35Ab1 proteins is expected to perform as a single trait hybrid for WCR control, potentially reducing the time required for resistance evolution to occur and expand throughout a problem region as a consequence9,51,52. The addition of a different mode of action, such as the DvSnf7 double stranded RNA pyramided with Bt in SmartStax Pro for WCR control53, or any other bacterial toxin, including but not limited to Bt, could help delay resistance evolution in the field18. Based on its toxicity and lack of cross-resistance with Bt proteins reported in this study (Table 1; Fig. 1), the biopesticide Csp_P could potentially kill those WCR with homozygous Bt-resistance as well as heterozygotes and delay the development of resistant populations, depending on the concentration and if delivered properly against WCR larvae.
The lack of cross-resistance with the Bt-resistant WCR strains after exposure to Csp_P is indicated not only by the similar LC50 values we found (except for WCR Texas), but also by the EC50 and MIC50 values (except for the WCR-SUS, mCry-R, and Texas strains), based on overlapping 95% C.I. values (Table 1). It is important to note that even the lowest concentration of Csp_P (1.25 µg/cm2) caused significant growth inhibition in all WCR strains, based on lower dry weight and lower percent of 2nd instar larvae when compared to control (Fig. 2). It was not surprising that the field derived WCR from Texas exhibited the lowest LC50 and MIC50 values when compared to all other WCR strains (Table 1). It is possible that inbreeding depression could explain the strain’s increased susceptibility to Csp_P, or it could be related to the genetics of this specific strain collected from maize fields in Texas. It is not unusual that some of the WCR strains exhibit slow growth when compared to other strains. The WCR diapause larvae (and adults) are usually smaller than most diapausing strains (Pereira, personal observation), and this likely explains the lower larval dry weight observed in control (Fig. 1).
We exposed the WCR Texas larvae to Csp_P at 80 µg/cm2 for 72 h to evaluate histologically and note any symptoms to identify any possible mechanisms involved. It is unclear whether Csp_P produces pore-forming toxins, but it appeared to collapse the midgut entirely and dissolve the microvilli in those treated larvae (Fig. 3B), when compared to untreated larvae (Fig. 3A). Such symptoms were not markedly different from those observed in the WCR larvae following Bt exposure19. The identity of the insecticidal component(s) of Csp_P preparation is still unknown and is currently being identified and characterized.
Sampson et al.20 have evaluated the toxicity of purified C. piscinae protein against WCR larvae in diet assays, reporting an LC50 of ~ 60 µg/cm2; this value is two to five-fold higher than the LC50 values reported in our study for WCR (Table 1), although they did not report 95% C.I. values in their study. In addition, Sampson et al.20 reported less root damage in transformed maize plants expressing C. piscinae protein when compared to control plants that did not express C. piscinae protein. However, toxicity against SCR was not observed nor were NCR larvae tested in Sampson et al.20, as opposed to our study that confirmed activity of Csp_P to both species (Table 1).
Even though they are not directly comparable due to different formulations and purity, the LC50 values reported in this study for Csp_P in WCR larvae were higher than those values reported for purified Bt proteins, using similar diet assays57. Depending on the Bt protein, LC50 values can vary from 1.60 µg/cm2 for Gpp/TppAb1 to 6.39 µg/cm2 for mCry3A57. These values are approximately 3- to 18-fold lower than those found for Csp_P formulation, which was not purified. Csp_P formulation was also offered to WCR adults mixed with Cucurbitacin in powder or diluted in sucrose, but no mortality was observed at the concentration tested (data not shown).
In summary, the biopesticide Chromobacterium Csp_P was efficient in killing WCR, NCR, and SCR larvae from different strains including WCR resistant to differing Bt toxins with varying levels of susceptibility among the three species, and no cross-resistance with Bt toxins. Resistance management practices, including crop rotation and the use of products that do not confer cross-resistance, should be implemented to avoid the spread of resistance alleles in those areas with resistance. The next steps should focus on determining the corn rootworm active components, testing Csp_P as a seed treatment in plant assays for corn rootworm larvae, on selected natural enemies for an initial risk assessment for integrated pest management, and also on non corn rootworm pests to determine if Csp_P is a broad-spectrum insecticide.
Materials and methods
Insects
Adults of the non-diapausing WCR susceptible and resistant strains were maintained in 30 × 30 × 30 cm BugDorm® cages (BioQuip Products, Rancho Dominguez, CA) at the Plant Genetics Research Unit, USDA/ARS in Columbia, MO. The eggs were collected in 9-cm Petri dishes (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA) containing 80-mesh sieved soil and kept at ~ 25 °C for prompt use (colony or assays) or at ~ 9 °C for later use. The rearing techniques are described elsewhere10,55,56. The diapausing NCR and WCR strain eggs were received from USDA/ARS in Brookings, SD. SCR eggs were purchased from Crop Characteristics Inc. (Farmington, MN). All egg dishes were kept in a dark chamber at 25 °C until bioassays were initiated.
The WCR colonies resistant to Cry3Bb1 and Gpp34/Tpp35Ab1 are described in Ludwick et al.57. These insect strains initially evolved some level of resistance in the field, were crossed to a non-diapausing strain from Brookings, SD, and thereafter were continuously selected on seeds expressing Cry3Bb1 or Gpp34/Tpp35Ab1 at the USDA-ARS facilities in Columbia, MO. The WCR eCry3.1Ab-R strain was generated from a population collected in 2008 by French Agricultural Research Inc. (Lamberton, MN), and has been maintained in the lab for over 40 generations58. The mCry3-R strain was generated from beetles collected at three different sites in Missouri in 200659. The WCR Texas strain was generated from a population collected from a mCry3A maize field in 2018 near Hart, Texas, and was suspected to be evolving resistance to mCry3A based on large number of beetles that emerged from the field60. Once brought to the lab, the F1 offspring of this colony were crossed with WCR non-diapause beetles from the USDA-ARS in Brookings, SD, to reduce generation time (non-diapause). Root damage data from greenhouse single plant assays indicated no resistance to mCry3A when compared to susceptible strain (data not shown). The strain has been reared on untreated non-Bt corn hybrid (Viking 42–92; Albert Lea Seed, Albert Lea, MN, USA), and is considered susceptible non-diapause field strain.
Air-dried Chromobacterium formulation
A Csp_P non-live air-dried preparation was generated by using the method ‘nonlive_1’ in a previously described protocol43. In brief, live Csp_P were inoculated onto 400 cm2 Luria Bertani agar plates and then cultured at 30 °C for 2 days. The plates were covered in Luria Bertani broth and incubated for a further 5 days at room temperature. The liquid phase was then removed, and the Csp_P biofilm was collected and air dried before being crushed to a fine powder with a mortar and pestle. The ‘biofilm’ is the bacterial cell growth and debris on the agarose plates after 7 days of growth. It is not a direct growth on the solid agarose surface, since liquid media was added prior to the 7 days growth (see Fig. 1 in Caragata et al.43). This preparation contains the insecticidal factor(s) that is/are currently being investigated. This Csp_P powder was stored at 4 °C and used in the assays described below.
Diet assays
The artificial diet used in this research for WCR was an improved diet described by Huynh et al.61. The NCR artificial diet was developed specifically for NCR62 and the SCR diet was purchased from Frontier Agricultural Sciences (Newark, DE). Rootworm egg sterilization and assays were conducted using methodology similar to that in Ludwick et al.57. The Csp_P was diluted in sucrose (50 mg/ml, pH 8.8; 99% purity, MP Biomedicals, Inc., Solon, OH) and six concentrations (1.25; 2.5; 5; 10; 20; and 40 µg/cm2) plus sucrose alone as control, were prepared in 2-fold dilutions. Sucrose was used in the assays as dilutant because buffers used with Bt proteins (e.g. sodium carbonate/bicarbonate or sodium citrate) usually exhibit some degree of growth inhibition in diet assays, and preliminary assays documented that Csp_P diluted in 20 mM of sodium carbonate/bicarbonate buffer, pH 10.0, gave results similar to those for sucrose. For the NCR assays, two additional higher Csp_P concentrations were added (80 and 160 µg/cm2), since 40 µg/cm2 caused ~ 20% mortality; for SCR, one additional concentration (320 µg/cm2) was added. The assays were performed in 96-well plates (Costar, Corning Incorporated, Corning, NY; model # 3596). Briefly, 200 µl of artificial diet was poured per well using multi-channel dispenser pipette (Eppendorf Repeater Plus/8 Pipette; No. 022264109, Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany) and allowed to dry. Twenty microliters of each concentration were dispensed per well using an automatic multi-channel pipette (model # 89134-746, VWR International, Radnor, PA) and allowed to dry in a fume hood for ~ 1 h. One, < 24 h old, neonate larva was transferred per well using a fine paint brush. The plates were sealed with an adhesive 96-well cover (Excel Scientific, Inc., Victorville, CA; Model # TSS-RTQ-100) and one hole was punched per well using a # 0 insect pin for gas exchange. The assays were performed in duplicate, with five replicates (plates) per trial for a total of 10 replicates. Each replicate represented the average measurement of eight insects per concentration. Mortality and the number of larvae that reached the second instar were recorded after 7 days. Surviving larvae from each concentration were collected in 0.5 ml centrifuge tubes containing 70% ethanol. After removing the excess of ethanol, tubes were placed in the oven (Binder Inc., Bohemia, NY; model 115) at 65 °C for at least 48 h, and dry weight was recorded using a Sartorius Cubis ultra-micro scale (Sartorius Corporate, Göttingen, Germany; Model # MSU 6.6S-000-DM) to estimate the EC5063.
Histology of exposed and non-exposed WCR larvae
WCR-Texas larvae were exposed to either 80 µg/cm2 of Csp_P diluted in 50 mg/ml of sucrose or to sucrose alone for 72 h in 96-well plates containing artificial diet, similar as described for diet assays. Larvae were collected after 72 h and placed in 1.5 ml centrifuge tubes containing FAA (50% ethyl alcohol, 5% glacial acetic acid and 10% formaldehyde) for 14 h at 4 °C. Larvae were dehydrated sequentially in a graded ethanol/xylene series and infiltrated with paraffin as described in Kim and Krishnan64. Paraffin-embedded larvae were sectioned with a microtome to a thickness of 5 µm and were stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Images of stained larvae sections were acquired to visualize the midgut region and were obtained at 10 × and 40 × with a Leica DM5500B widefield microscope (Leica Microsystems, Buffalo Grove, IL, USA) equipped with a Leica DFC290 color camera.
Statistical analysis
The mortality (as a percentage) and the percentage of larvae reaching second instar were calculated by dividing the number of surviving or second instar larvae, respectively, by the total number of larvae transferred to the plates for each treatment. The LC50 and MIC50 data were generated using PROC PROBIT with Distribution = Logistic in SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). For LC50 and MIC50, the number of dead larvae and the number of larvae that reached the second instar, respectively, were used in the analysis to generate the values. Average larval weight was recorded as the pooled larval weight/number of surviving larvae in each treatment. A nonlinear regression model using PROC NLIN in SAS 9.4 was adopted to generate the EC50 values by using dry weight data, following the methods described in Marçon et al.65. Control mortality in all plates was < 7%.
Data availability
All pertinent data are found in the figures and tables. Requests for data and additional information should be submitted to the corresponding author.
References
Krysan, J. L. Introduction: biology, distribution, and identification of pest Diabrotica, in Methods for the Study of Pest Diabrotica (eds. Krysan, J. L. & Miller, T. A.) 1–23 (Springer, New York, 1986).
Levine, E. & Oloumi-Sadeghi, H. Management of diabroticite rootworms in corn. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 36, 229–255 (1991).
Gray, M. E., Sappington, T. W., Miller, N. J., Moeser, J. & Bohn, M. O. Adaptation and invasiveness of western corn rootworm: Intensifying research on a worsening pest. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 54, 303–321 (2009).
Meinke, L. J. et al. Western corn rootworm (Diabrotica virgifera virgifera LeConte) population dynamics. J. Agric. Forest Entomol. 11, 29–46 (2009).
Wechsler, S. & Smith, D. Has resistance taken root in US corn fields? Demand for insect control. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 100, 1136–1150 (2018).
Hou, X., Meinke, L. J. & Arkebauer, T. J. Soil moisture and larval western corn rootworm injury: influence on gas exchange parameters in corn. Agronomy J. 89, 709–717 (1997).
Urías-López, M. A. & Meinke, L. J. Influence of western corn rootworm (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) larval injury on yield of different types of maize. J. Econ. Entomol. 94, 106–111 (2001).
Gassmann, A. J. et al. Evidence of resistance to Cry34/35Ab1 corn by western corn rootworm (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae): root injury in the field and larval survival in plant-based bioassays. J. Econ. Entomol. 109, 1872–1880 (2016).
Gassmann, A. J., Shrestha, R. B., Kropf, A. L., St Clair, C. R. & Brenizer, B. D. Field-evolved resistance by western corn rootworm to Cry34/35Ab1 and other Bacillus thuringiensis traits in transgenic maize. P. Manag. Sci. 76, 268–276 (2020).
Zukoff, S. N. et al. Multiple assays indicate varying levels of cross resistance in Cry3Bb1-selected field populations of the western corn rootworm to mCry3A, eCry3.1Ab, and Cry34/35Ab1. J. Econ. Entomol. 109, 1387–1398 (2016).
Ludwick, D. C. et al. Minnesota field population of western corn rootworm (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) shows incomplete resistance to Cry34Ab1/Cry35Ab1 and Cry3Bb1. J. Appl. Entomol. 141, 28–40 (2017).
Calles-Torrez, V. et al. Transgenic Bt corn, soil insecticide, and insecticidal seed treatment effects on corn rootworm (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) beetle emergence, larval feeding injury, and corn yield in North Dakota. J. Econ. Entomol. 111, 348–360 (2018).
Calles-Torrez, V. et al. Field-evolved resistance of northern and western corn rootworm (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) populations to corn hybrids expressing single and pyramided Cry3Bb1 and Cry34/35Ab1 Bt proteins in North Dakota. J. Econ. Entomol. 112, 1875–1886 (2019).
Reinders, J. D., Reinders, E. E., Robinson, E. A., French, B. W. & Meinke, L. J. Evidence of western corn rootworm (Diabrotica virgifera virgifera LeConte) field-evolved resistance to Cry3Bb1 + Cry34/35Ab1 maize in Nebraska. Pest Manag. Sci. 78, 1356–1366 (2021).
Khajuria, C. et al. Development and characterization of the first dsRNA-resistant insect population from western corn rootworm Diabrotica virgifera virgifera LeConte. PLoS ONE 13, e0197059 (2018).
Paddock, K. J., M. Robert, C. A., Erb, M. & Hibbard, B. E. Western corn rootworm, plant and microbe interactions: A review and prospects for new management traits. Insects. 12, 171 (2021).
Wang, K., Shu, C. & Zhang, J. Effective bacterial insecticidal proteins against coleopteran pests: A review. Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 102, e21558 (2019).
Moar, W. J., Giddings, K. S., Narva, K. E. & Nelson, M. E. Enhancing global food security by using bacterial proteins with improved safety profiles to control insect pests. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 187, 107704 (2022).
Bowling, A. J. et al. Histopathological effects of Bt and TcdA insecticidal proteins on the midgut epithelium of western corn rootworm larvae (Diabrotica virgifera virgifera). Toxins. 9, 156 (2017).
Sampson, K. et al. Discovery of a novel insecticidal protein from Chromobacterium piscinae, with activity against western corn rootworm Diabrotica virgifera virgifera. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 142, 34–43 (2017).
Zaitseva, J. et al. Structure-function characterization of an insecticidal protein GNIP1Aa, a member of an MACPF and β-tripod families. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 116, 2897–2906 (2019).
Schellenberger, U. et al. A selective insecticidal protein from Pseudomonas for controlling corn rootworms. Science 354, 634–637 (2016).
Tabashnik, B. E. Tips for battling billion-dollar beetles. Science 354, 552–553 (2016).
Wei, J. Z. et al. A selective insecticidal protein from Pseudomonas mosselii for corn rootworm control. Plant Biotechnol. J. 16, 649–659 (2018).
Boeckman, C. J. et al. Characterization of the spectrum of insecticidal activity for IPD072Aa: A protein derived from Psuedomonas chlororaphis with activity against Diabrotica virgifera virgifera (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 112, 1190–1196 (2019).
Moar, W. J., Berry, C. & Narva, K. E. The structure/function of new insecticidal proteins and regulatory challenges for commercialization. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 142, 1–4 (2017).
Yalpani, N. et al. An Alcaligenes strain emulates Bacillus thuringiensis producing a binary protein that kills corn rootworm through a mechanism similar to Cry34Ab1/Cry35Ab1. Sci. Rep. 7, 3063 (2017).
Bowen, D. et al. Cry75Aa (Mpp75Aa) Insecticidal proteins for controlling the western corn rootworm, Diabrotica virgifera virgifera LeConte (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), isolated from the insect-pathogenic bacterium Brevibacillus laterosporus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 87, e02507-e2520 (2021).
Panevska, A. et al. Pore-forming protein complexes from Pleurotus mushrooms kill western corn rootworm and Colorado potato beetle through targeting membrane ceramide phosphoethanolamine. Sci. Rep. 9, 5073 (2019).
Fortea, E. et al. Cry6Aa1, a Bacillus thuringiensis nematocidal and insecticidal toxin, forms pores in planar lipid bilayers at extremely low concentrations and without the need of proteolytic processing. J. Biol. Chem. 292, 13122–13132 (2017).
Bravo, A. et al. Susceptible and mCry3A resistant corn rootworm larvae killed by a non-hemolytic Bacillus thuringiensis Cyt1Aa mutant. Sci. Rep. 8, 17805 (2018).
Hou, J. et al. Engineering of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry proteins to enhance the activity against western corn rootworm. Toxins. 11, 162 (2019).
Yin, Y. et al. A new Bacillus thuringiensis protein for western corn rootworm control. PLoS ONE 15, e0242791 (2020).
Kouadio, J. L. et al. Structural and functional insights into the first Bacillus thuringiensis vegetative insecticidal protein of the Vpb4 fold, active against western corn rootworm. PLoS ONE 16, e0260532 (2021).
Ball, H. J. & Weekman, G. T. Insecticide resistance in the adult western corn rootworm in Nebraska. J. Econ. Entomol. 55, 439–441 (1962).
Meinke, L. J., Siegfried, B. D., Wright, R. J. & Chandler, L. D. Adult susceptibility of Nebraska western corn rootworm (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) populations to selected insecticides. J. Econ. Entomol. 91, 594–600 (1998).
Levine, E., Spencer, J. L., Isard, S. A., Onstad, D. W. & Gray, M. E. Adaptation of the western corn rootworm to crop rotation: evolution of a new strain in response to a management practice. Am. Entomol. 48, 94–107 (2002).
Gassmann, A. J., Petzold-Maxwell, J. L., Keweshan, R. S. & Dunbar, M. W. Field-evolved resistance to Bt maize by western corn rootworm. PLoS ONE 6, e22629 (2011).
Pereira, A. E. et al. Evidence of field-evolved resistance to bifenthrin in western corn rootworm (Diabrotica virgifera virgifera LeConte) populations in western Nebraska and Kansas. PLoS ONE 10, e0142299 (2015).
Pereira, A. E., Souza, D., Zukoff, S. N., Meinke, L. J. & Siegfried, B. D. Cross-resistance and synergism bioassays suggest multiple mechanisms of pyrethroid resistance in western corn rootworm populations. PLoS ONE 12, e0179311 (2017).
Ramirez, J. L. et al. Reciprocal tripartite interactions between the Aedes aegypti midgut microbiota, innate immune system and dengue virus influences vector competence. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 6, e1561 (2012).
Ramirez, J. L. et al. Chromobacterium Csp_P reduces malaria and dengue infection in vector mosquitoes and has entomopathogenic and in vitro anti-pathogen activities. PLoS Pathog. 10, e1004398 (2014).
Caragata, E. P., Otero, L. M., Carlson, J. S., Dizaji, N. B. & Dimopoulos, G. A. Nonlive preparation of Chromobacterium sp. Panama (Csp_P) is a highly effective larval mosquito biopesticide. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 86, e00240–20 (2020).
Gassmann, A. J. et al. Field-evolved resistance by western corn rootworm to multiple Bacillus thuringiensis toxins in transgenic maize. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, 5141–5146 (2014).
Wangila, D. S., Gassmann, A. J., Petzold-Maxwell, J. L., French, B. W. & Meinke, L. J. Susceptibility of Nebraska western corn rootworm (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) populations to Bt corn events. J. Econ. Entomol. 108, 742–751 (2015).
Jakka, S. R. K., Shrestha, R. B. & Gassmann, A. J. Broad-spectrum resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis toxins by western corn rootworm (Diabrotica virgifera virgifera). Sci. Rep. 6, 27860 (2016).
Reinders, J. D., Hitt, B. D., Stroup, W. W., French, B. W. & Meinke, L. J. Spatial variation in western corn rootworm (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) susceptibility to Cry3 toxins in Nebraska. PLoS ONE 13, e0208266 (2018).
EPA. Environmental Protection Agency. EPA’s changes to the Bt corn rootworm resistance management program https://www.regulations.gov/document?D=EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-0805-0094 (2016).
Shrestha, R. B., Jakka, S. R. & Gassmann, A. J. Response of Cry3Bb1-resistant western corn rootworm (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) to Bt maize and soil insecticide. J. Appl. Entomol. 142, 937–946 (2018).
Carrière, Y. et al. Crop rotation mitigates impacts of corn rootworm resistance to transgenic Bt corn. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117, 18385–18392 (2020).
Roush, R. T. Two-toxin strategies for management of insecticidal transgenic crops: can pyramiding succeed where pesticide mixtures have not? Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci. 353, 1777–1786 (1998).
Onstad, D. W. & Meinke, L. J. Modeling evolution of Diabrotica virgifera virgifera (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) to transgenic corn with two insecticidal traits. J. Econ. Entomol. 103, 849–860 (2010).
EPA. Environmental Protection Agency. Pesticide registration: EPA registers innovative tool to control corn rootworm. https://www.epa.gov/pesticide-registration/epa-registers-innovative-tool-control-corn-rootworm (2017).
Pereira, A. E. et al. Comparative susceptibility of western corn rootworm (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) neonates to selected insecticides and Bt proteins in the presence and absence of feeding stimulants. J. Econ. Entomol. 112, 842–851 (2019).
Meihls, L. N. et al. Increased survival of western corn rootworm on transgenic corn within three generations of on-plant greenhouse selection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 19177–19182 (2008).
Meihls, L. N., Higdon, M. L., Ellersieck, M. R., Tabashnik, B. E. & Hibbard, B. E. Greenhouse-selected resistance to Cry3Bb1-producing corn in three western corn rootworm populations. PLoS ONE 7, e51055 (2012).
Ludwick, D. C. et al. A new artificial diet for western corn rootworm larvae is compatible with and detects resistance to all current Bt toxins. Sci. Rep. 8, 5379 (2018).
Frank, D. L., Zukoff, A., Barry, J., Higdon, M. L. & Hibbard, B. E. Development of resistance to eCry3.1Ab-expressing transgenic maize in a laboratory-selected population of western corn rootworm (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 106, 2506–2513 (2013).
Meihls, L. N., Higdon, M. L., Ellersieck, M. R. & Hibbard, B. E. Selection for resistance to mCry3A-expressing transgenic corn in western corn rootworm. J. Econ. Entomol. 104, 1045–1054 (2011).
Porter, P., Siders, K. & Vyavhare, S. Texas panhandle corn rootworm probably resistant to some Bt corn. Focus in Entomology. https://focusonagriculture.blogspot.com/2018/08/ (2018).
Huynh, M. P. et al. Development of an improved and accessible diet for western corn rootworm larvae using response surface modeling. Sci. Rep. 9, 16009 (2019).
Huynh, M. P. et al. Multidimensional approach to formulating a specialized diet for northern corn rootworm larvae. Sci. Rep. 9, 3709 (2019).
Siegfried, B. D., Vaughn, T. T. & Spencer, T. Baseline susceptibility of western corn rootworm (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) to Cry3Bb1 Bacillus thuringiensis toxin. J. Econ. Entomol. 98, 1320–1324 (2005).
Kim, W.-S. & Krishnan, H. B. Expression of an 11 kDa methionine-rich delta-zein in transgenic soybean results in the formation of two types of novel protein bodies in transitional cells situated between the vascular tissue and storage parenchyma cells. Plant. Biotechnol. J. 2, 199–210 (2004).
Marçon, P. C., Young, L. J., Steffey, K. L. & Siegfried, B. D. Baseline susceptibility of European corn borer (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) to Bacillus thuringiensis toxins. J. Econ. Entomol. 92, 279–285 (1999).
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Julie Barry for keeping the WCR colonies and providing the eggs for the assays, and Chad Nielson for providing the NCR eggs. We thank Dr. Deborah McClellan for editorial assistance. This research has been funded by the USDA/ARS Columbia, MO, and the University of Missouri. Mention of trade names or commercial products in this article is solely for providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, the Johns Hopkins University, or the University of Missouri.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization: A.E.P., J.L.R.; data curation: A.E.P., M.P.H., K.J.P.; formal analysis: A.E.P.; funding acquisition: B.E.H., J.L.R., G.D.; investigation: A.E.P., M.P.H.; Methodology: A.E.P.; project administration: A.E.P., J.L.R.; resources: B.E.H., J.L.R., G.D., E.P.C., K.S.S., S.K.S.; supervision: A.E.P.; validation: A.E.P.; visualization: A.E.P., J.L.R.; roles/writing—original draft—A.E.P.; writing—review and editing: A.E.P., J.L.R., S.K.S., B.E.H. All co-authors read and approved the final draft of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Pereira, A.E., Huynh, M.P., Paddock, K.J. et al. Chromobacterium Csp_P biopesticide is toxic to larvae of three Diabrotica species including strains resistant to Bacillus thuringiensis. Sci Rep 12, 17858 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-22229-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-22229-6
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.