Abstract
The current study assessed the nematicidal and plant growth promoting potential of metabolites produced by Streptomyces hydrogenans strain DH-16 on morphological and physiological activities in 60 days old Solanum lycopersicum plants grown under Meloidogyne incognita stress. M. incognita infestation altered the levels of various photosynthetic pigments, various stress markers, enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidants in S. lycopersicum plants grown under in-vivo conditions. However, treatment with culture cells, supernatant and extract produced by S. hydrogenans strain DH-16 significantly reduced the number of galls in M. incognita infested plants when compared with untreated M. incognita infected plants. Moreover, the culture cells/ supernatant/ extract remarkably lowered the levels of stress markers (Hydrogen peroxide and Malondialdehyde) in infected plants and enhanced the activities of non-enzymatic antioxidants (glutathione, tocopherol) and enzymatic antioxidants (Catalase, Superoxide dismutase, Ascorbate peroxidase, Guaiacol peroxidase, Gluatathione-S-transferase and Polyphenol oxidase) in metabolites treated M. incognita infected plants. The enhanced level of different photosynthetic attributes were also evaluated by studying gas exchange parameters and different plant pigments. Moreover, an increment in the content of phenolic compounds such as total phenols, anthocyanin and flavonoids were also reflected in treated and nematode infested plants. The present study also evaluated the microscopic analysis depicting cell viability, nuclear damage and hydrogen peroxide localization in differently treated plants. The outcome of the present study therefore endorses the efficacy of DH-16 as a potential biocontrol agent that help plants in mitigating M. incognita stress.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Solanum lycopersicum (tomato) is one of the essential crops after potato that is cultivated worldwide because of its application in the agrofood industry1. The fruit of the plant is known to have high nutritional value, as it consists of antioxidants, flavonoids, vitamins, β-carotene, etc. But it is well documented that the growth and productivity of this crop is hindered by various abiotic and biotic stressors. Among biotic stressors, Plant parasitic nematode (PPN), Meloidogyne incognita acts as major constraint in the productivity of tomato crop, which further affect the maintenance of supply of this highly nutritious food item to the whole population, which is increasing at an alarming rate2.
M. incognita is a microscopic organism that resides in the soil and mainly infects the living tissues of host plant3. Second stage juveniles (J2) are the infective stage of M. incognita that penetrates into plant through roots and migrate towards the vascular tissue of plant4, afterwards moving towards the adjacent cells where they result in the formation of permanent feeding sites. Permanent feeding sites are basically formed of multicellular (giant) cells that further grow into root knot or galls5. These giant cells are the specific sites where M. incognita proliferates and develops an association with the host plant4,6. Moreover, PPNs also modulates the host protein machinery, thus resulting in protein denaturation and also alteration of various metabolic processes in host plants7. The main symptoms of PPNs infestation includes gall formation, disruptive water and mineral absorption and transportation, thus affecting the water-nutrient balance in plants, that further results in chlorosis and also makes the plant more susceptible to other pathogens8,9. In order to control the menace caused by these pathogens various nematode inhibitory chemicals are accessible from the market, but these chemical agents impose ill effects on non-target flora and fauna. Other strategies include crop rotation, use of resistant varieties, etc. but these strategies also exhibit certain limitations2. Despite all these methods, PPNs result in yearly loss of 100 billion dollars10. Thus, it is necessary to look for an effective environmentally safe management strategy for PPNs. One such strategy is the application of microbial organisms as biological control agents against PPNs11. Among microbes, Actinobacteria, which are G-C rich gram-positive bacteria are reported as the source of various biometabolites. Majority of these biometabolites include secondary metabolites in the form of agroactive compounds, for instance, Streptomycetes has been reported to act as biofertilizers that can increase fertility of soil and functional biodiversity in the rhizospheric region12,13. Furthermore, a number of plant growth promoting Actinomycetes also exhibits antifungal or antibacterial properties which was anticipated during their screening as biological control agents14,15.
Being rhizobacteria, Streptomycetes also promote plant growth, makes nutrients and minerals available to plants and also impose negative impact on different biotic stressors including M. incognita infestation11,16,17. Keeping into consideration the enhancing drift regarding the application of microorganisms as biological control agents, the current work has been framed for assessing the biocontrol and plant growth promoting potential of S. hydrogenans strain DH-16 against 60 days old nematode infested S. lycopersicum plants.
Results
Morphological parameters
The effect of biometabolites produced by S. hydrogenans strain DH-16 was examined on various morphological attributes of tomato plant like plant height (root, shoot length), fresh biomass (fresh root weight, fresh shoot weight) and nematode gall number on tomato roots (Fig. 1, Table 1). All these morphological parameters showed a considerable difference among different treatments in the current study. M. incognita infestation has resulted in decreased root length, shoot length and shoot weight by 38, 23 and 44%, respectively and the root weight was found enhanced in nematode infested plants by 17%, when compared with control plants. All these growth parameters were found enhanced in nematode infested plants treated with culture cells (CC), supernatant (S) and extract (E). Root length, shoot length, root and shoot weight was observed to be increased in culture cells (CC) treated plants by 99, 43, 138 and 166%, respectively when compared with untreated M. incognita stressed tomato plants. Moreover, amendment with Supernatant (S) also enhanced all these attributes by 147, 65, 567and 375% respectively, when compared with nematode infested untreated plants. Furthermore, treatment of extract (E) also enhanced all the parameters by 149, 28.7, 120 and 15% respectively, when compared with untreated nematode infected seedlings. But the increment of 8.25 and 10.3% was found in shoot length and shoot weight in case of culture cells treated nematode infected plants when assessed against their counter control plants (i.e., uninfected culture cells treated plants). However, culture cell treated nematode inoculated plants showed decrease in root length and root weight by 21.83 and 42.9% respectively, when compared to uninfected culture cell amended tomato plants. Further all these respective growth attributes except for gall number were found enhanced in nematode infected supernatant treated tomato by 9.3, 2.4, 11.27 and 5.3% respectively, when compared to their counter control plants. Similarly, root and shoot length were found enhanced in nematode infected extract treated plants by 10.16 and 2.15%, but root weight and shoot weight were found decreased by 24 and 36% respectively, when compared to uninfected extract amended tomato plants.
Figure depicting root length and shoot length of differently treated tomato plants. Different treatments include C (control); NI (nematode inoculated); CC (culture cells); CC + NI (culture cells + nematode inoculated); S (supernatant); S + NI (supernatant + nematode inoculated); E (extract); E + NI (extract + nematode inoculated).
The number of nematode galls on plant roots were significantly reduced in culture cells, supernatant and extract treated plants by 57.6, 42.3 and 61.5%, respectively when compared to non-treated infected plants.
Photosynthetic pigments
The levels of Chl ‘a’, total Chl and carotenoid content were significantly reduced in nematode infested plants by 95.86, 42 and 17.7% respectively, when compared to control plants. The levels of chl ‘a’, chl ‘b’,total chl and carotenoid content in culture cells treated nematode infected tomato plants were elevated by 188.3, 13.17, 100.3 and 57.9% respectively when compared to untreated nematode infested plants. Moreover, the levels were also enhanced in supernatant treated plants by 1835, 18.4, 103 and 41.6% respectively, when compared to non-treated nematode infested tomato plants. The levels of photosynthetic pigments were also significantly enhanced in extract treated nematode infested tomato plants by 3215, 64, 88.8 and 1.29% respectively, when compared to untreated nematode infested tomato plants. However, all these parameters except chl ‘b’ were found down- regulated in culture cells treated nematode infected plants by 41.39, 17.55 and 19.5% respectively when compared to uninfected culture cells amended plants. Similarly, chl ‘a’ and total chl were found decreased in supernatant amended nematode inoculated plants by 52.03 and 11.08%, when compared to uninfected supernatant amended plants. Moreover, in case of extract amended nematode inoculated plants, decline in the levels of total chl and carotenoid content was observed by 26.38 and 23.11% respectively, when compared to uninfected extract amended tomato plants (Fig. 2a-d, Table S1).
(a-d) Photosynthetic pigments (a) Chlorophyll ‘a’ content; (b) Chlorophyll ‘b’ content; (c) Total chlorophyll content; (d) Carotenoid content in M. incognita inoculated 60 days old tomato plants treated with S. hydrogenans strain DH-16. Different treatments are represented as C (control), NI (nematode inoculated), CC (culture cells), CC + NI (culture cells + nematode inoculated), S (supernatant), S + NI (supernatant + nematode inoculated), E (crude extract), E + NI (crude extract + nematode inoculated). Results are given in mean ± standard error and F-value ** indicates significance at p ≤ 0.01 as per Tukey’s test. Different letters a, b, c represents significant difference among treatments and same letters represent no significant difference.
Gas analysis parameters
Various gas analysis parameters like photosynthetic rate, conductance, carbon intake and transpiration rate were found decreased in nematode infested plants by 73, 83, 10.3 and 72.7% respectively, when compared to control plants. But the levels were enhanced in plants treated with culture cells by 212, 400, 12.7 and 408% respectively, when compared to untreated nematode infected plants. Furthermore, treatment with supernatant also elevated the levels of photosynthetic rate, conductance, carbon intake and transpiration rate by 188, 262, 0.95 and 110% respectively, when compared to untreated nematode infested plants. The treatment of extract also enhanced the levels of all the parameters by 141, 175, 7.6 and 204% respectively when compared to untreated M. incognita infested plants (Fig. 3a-d). Similarly, all the gas exchange parameters except carbon intake were found decreased in case of culture cell treated nematode infected plants by 21.5, 38.47 and 2.01% respectively, when evaluated against uninfected culture cells amended plants. However, decline of 23.06, 43.37, 2.76 and 38.21% in all these attributes was reported in nematode infested supernatant amended tomato plants, when compared to uninfected supernatant supplemented tomato plants. Similar decline of 17.35, 40.7, 0.88 and 11.50% was observed in nematode infected extract treated plants, when compared to uninfected extract supplemented plants (Fig. 3a-d; Table S2).
(a-d) Gas analysis parameters (a) Photosynthetic rate; (b) Conductance; (c) Carbon intake; (d) Transpiration rate in M. incognita inoculated 60 days old tomato plants under treatment with S. hydrogenans strain DH-16. Different treatments are represented as C (control), NI (nematode inoculated), CC (culture cells), CC + NI (culture cells + nematode inoculated), S (supernatant), S + NI (supernatant + nematode inoculated), E (crude extract), E + NI (crude extract + nematode inoculated). Results are given in mean ± standard error and F-value ** indicates significance at p ≤ 0.01 and ns indicates non-significant difference as per Tukey’s test. Different letters a, b, c, d represent significant difference among treatments and same letters represent no significant difference.
Oxidative burst
The level of MDA and H2O2 were found enhanced in nematode infested seedlings by 34 and 138.9%, respectively, when compared to untreated and uninfected control plants. The level was further elevated in culture cells treated nematode infested plants by 6.8 and 61.26%, respectively when compared with nematode infested untreated plants. Furthermore, amendment of nematode infected tomato plant with supernatant also resulted in enhanced levels of MDA and H2O2 by 10.5 and 50.4%, respectively. The level was also elevated in nematode infested extract (E) treated plants by 19.7 and 35.8%, when compared to nematode infested untreated tomato plants. Further increment of 21.82 and 0.36% in the levels of MDA and H2O2 was observed in case of nematode infected culture cells treated tomato plants, when compared to their respective counter control plants. A similar increase of 18.45 and 85.73% was observed in supernatant treated nematode infected plants, when compared to uninfected supernatant supplemented plants. A similar trend of enhancement by 4.65 and 4.36% was also seen in case of nematode infected extract treated plants when compared to uninfected extract amended tomato plants(Fig. 4a,b; Table S3).
(a-b) Level of stress markers (a) MDA content; (b) H2O2 content in M. incognita inoculated 60 days old tomato plants treated with bioactive components produced by S. hydrogenans strain DH-16. Different treatments are represented as C (control), NI (nematode inoculated), CC (culture cells), CC + NI (culture cells + nematode inoculated), S (supernatant), S + NI (supernatant + nematode inoculated), E (crude extract), E + NI (crude extract + nematode inoculated). Results are given in mean ± standard error form and F-value ** indicates significance at p ≤ 0.01 as per Tukey’s test. Different letters a, b, c, d represent significant difference among treatments and same letters represent no significant difference.
Antioxidative enzymes
The efficacy of biometabolites was also assessed in nematode infested plants by studying the specific activities of various antioxidative enzymes. The level of various enzymes like CAT, SOD, APOX, GuPOX, PPO and GST was found elevated in nematode infested tomato plants by 157, 191, 235, 132, 46 and 75%, respectively when compared to the control plants. The level of these enzymes were further enhanced in culture cells treated M. incognita infested plants by 29, 11, 34, 9.6, 9.4 and 28.6% respectively, when compared with M. incognita infested untreated tomato plants. Amendment of supernatant also elevated the activities of CAT, SOD, APOX, PPO and GST by 19, 91.4, 63.8, 20.4 and 11.8% respectively when compared with untreated nematode infected plants. Furthermore, treatment of extract also resulted in increment in the activities of CAT, SOD, APOX, POD, PPO and GST by 26, 91.4, 24.2, 61.9, 65 and 34.56% respectively when compared to untreated nematode infested plants. The specific activity of all these enzymes were found enhanced in culture cells treated nematode infected plants by 210, 69.56, 79.77, 73, 73.4 and 65% respectively, when assessed against uninfected culture cells treated plants. Similarly, the activities of all these enzymes except SOD were found upregulated by 160, 56.5, 7.118, 48.6 and 168.6% respectively, when compared to their counter control plants. Further, the specific activity of all these enzymes except SOD and GST were found enhanced by 85.71, 77, 38.59 and 16.89% respectively in case of extract amended nematode inoculated plants, when evaluated against uninfected extract supplemented plants (Table 2).
Non-enzymatic antioxidants
Total glutathione and tocopherol contents were also assessed and were found enhanced in plants growing under the influence of nematodes by 122 and 108% when compared to control plants. The levels were found enhanced further in culture cells treated nematode infested plants by 17.89 and 59.08% respectively, when compared with nematode infected untreated plants. Moreover, application of supernatant also enhanced the levels of glutathione and tocopherol by 28.79 and 54.58% respectively, when evaluated against nematode inoculated untreated plants. The levels were also enhanced in extract treated plants by 20.8 and 55.11% respectively, when compared to nematode infested untreated tomato plants. However, an enhancement in total glutathione and tocopherol content by 89.3 and 13.74% was reported in case of culture cells treated nematode inoculated plants, when compared to uninfected culture cells treated plants. Similar upregulation of 89.3 and 13,74% respectively was observed in supernatant treated nematode inoculated plants, when compared to uninfected supernatant treated plants. Additionally extract amended nematode infected plants also showed an increment of 83.28 and 16.13% repectively, when compared to their counter control plants (Fig. 5a-b; Table S4).
(a-b) Levels of non-enzymatic antioxidants (a) Total glutathione content; (b) Tocopherol content in M. incognita inoculated 60 days old tomato plants treated with S. hydrogenans strain DH-16 in the form of culture cells (CC), supernatant (S) and crude extract (E). Different treatments are represented as C (control), NI (nematode inoculated), CC (culture cells), CC + NI (culture cells + nematode inoculated), S (supernatant), S + NI (supernatant + nematode inoculated), E (crude extract), E + NI (crude extract + nematode inoculated). Results are given in mean ± standard error and F-value ** indicates significance at p ≤ 0.01 as per Tukey’s test. Different letters a, b, c, d represent significant difference among treatments and same letters represent no significant difference.
Phenolic compounds
Total phenolic, flavonoid and anthocyanin contents were found increased in nematode infested plants by 179, 35 and 22% respectively, when compared to control plants. But the levels were enhanced in culture cells treated nematode infested plants by 51, 10 and 6% respectively, when compared to untreated nematode infected plants. Furthermore, amendment with supernatant also enhanced the levels by 59, 22 and 36% respectively, when compared to nematode infected untreated plants. The treatment of extract also elevated the levels of phenolic and flavonoid compounds by 58 and 15% respectively, when compared with untreated nematode infected plants. However, an increment of 81.3% was observed in the level of anthocyanin in culture cells treated nematode infected tomato plants, when compared to uninfected culture cells treated plants. Similar, upregulation of 70.23% was also observed in nematode infected extract supplemented plants, when assessed against extract treated control tomato plants (Fig. 6a-c; Table S5).
(a-c) Level of phenolic compounds (a) Total phenolic content; (b) Flavonoid content; (c) Anthocyanin content in M. incognita inoculated 60 days old tomato plants treated with S. hydrogenans strain DH-16. Different treatments are represented as C (control), NI (nematode inoculated), CC (culture cells), CC + NI (culture cells + nematode inoculated), S (supernatant), S + NI (supernatant + nematode inoculated), E (crude extract), E + NI (crude extract + nematode inoculated). Results are given in mean ± standard error and F-value *indicates significance at p ≤ 0.05 as per Tukey’s test. Different letters a, b represents significant difference among treatments and same letters represent no significant difference.
Microscopic studies
Cell viability was evaluated on the basis of intensity of red colour. It was observed that the maximum damage, as indicated by intensity of Propidium iodide (PI) was seen in M. incognita infected plants when compared to control tomato plants, indicating that the uninfected control plants were more viable. Furthermore, treated nematode infected plants were less damaged as compared to untreated nematode inoculated plants (Fig. 7a).
(a–c) Micrographs depicting (a) cell viability; (b) membrane damage; (c) hydrogen peroxide localization in differently treated S. lycopersicum seedlings. Different treatments are represented as C (control), NI (nematode inoculated); CC (culture cells); CC + NI (culture cells + nematode inoculated); S (supernatant); S + NI (supernatant + nematode inoculated); E (extract); E + NI (extract + nematode inoculated).
Nuclear damage was also assessed on the basis of the intensity of blue colour, which was found to be maximum in case of untreated nematode infected plants when compared to control and metabolites supplemented nematode infected plants (Fig. 7b).
Hydrogen peroxide tagging was also studied as per the intensity of green colour (because of DCF-DA) and the maximum tagging was found in nematode infected plants in comparison to control plants, depicting maximum oxidative stress in nematode stressed plants. Moreover, the tagging was less in case of biometabolites supplemented nematode infected tomato plants (Fig. 7c).
Discussion
Since, M. incognita imposes a negative impact on the yield and productivity of almost all the crops, various biocontrol agents are being explored for the management of PPNs. Moreover, various factors like environmentally safe nature, low-cost value and easy mode of application make the use of biocontrol microbes a more efficient approach for controlling PPNs population18,19. Therefore, in present study we have evaluated the potential of biometabolites produced by S. hydrogenans in the form of culture cells, supernatant and extract against M. incognita infecting S. lycopersicum plants growing under in-vivo conditions.
In the present work, it has been found that M. incognita infestation results in reduced growth attributes (root length, shoot length, shoot weight) in 60 days old S. lycopersicum plants. This reduction is attributed to the disruption in the structure of root in the form of galls, which further alters the uptake and transportation of water and nutrients from the roots to other parts of the host plant, thus ultimately imposing a negative impact on normal metabolism in plants. However, the root weight was found enhanced in nematode infected plants when compared to healthy control plants, this enhancement might be because of heavily infected roots (with large number of galls). Our findings are in agreement with the study of Abd-El-Al and co-workers20 in case of Luffa aegyptiaca (Sponge gourd). Additionally, the similar trend of reduction in growth parameters was also reported in case of M. incognita infected black gram plants21 and galls were formed in nematode infected plants. Gall formation occurs because of the rapid multiplication of nematodes after penetrating the root tissue of host plants. Similar findings were also reported in case of Matricaria reculita and S. lycopersicum plants22,23.
It has been noticed that amendment of biometabolites produced by microbial strain enhanced the root length, shoot length, root weight and shoot weight in M. incognita infested S. lycopersicum plants. In addition to growth attributes, the reduction in the number of galls was also found in treated plants. In previous studies also, it was observed that biometabolites produced by Streptomyces sp. promoted all the growth parameters and decreased the number of galls in nematode stressed tomato plants23. Our results also coincide with the findings of Mekete and co-workers24, where reduction in gall number was observed in case of Bacillus sp. supplemented Ethiopian coffee plants. These results might be because of the production of nematicidal compounds by microbial strains, which results in reduced gall formation and thus promotes the growth of the host plant.
The results derived from the current work suggested that nematode infestation also reduced the level of photosynthetic pigments like chl ‘a’, chl ‘b’, total chlorophyll and carotenoid in 60 days old tomato plants. These results concur with the previous studies in case of tomato and capsicum plants infected with nematodes23,25. This reduction in pigments is attributed to the formation of galls over the surface of the root, which further disrupts the transportation of water and also the level of photosynthetic pigments26. Our finding also depicts significant elevation in the level of plant pigments in case of biometabolites treated nematode infested tomato plants. These results are in agreement with the findings of Abd-El-Khair and co-workers27 which states that supplementation of B. subtilis, B. pumilus and P. fluoriscens promoted the content of pigments in nematode infected cowpea plants. Moreover, Sharma and group28 also reported an upregulation in the level of these pigments in S. antibioticus treated tomato plants that were growing under nematode stress. This increment in the level of pigments might be because of the role of microbes in promoting translocation of minerals and also in safeguarding photosynthetic machinery.
Downregulation in various gaseous exchange parameters has also been reported in M. incognita infected S. lycopersicum plants. Similar reports were reported previously in the case of coffee and tomato plants infected with nematodes29,30. This downregulation is attributed to hindrance in water uptake because of gall formation31. Our study also reveals that amendment of plants with biometabolites produced by S. hydrogenans results in elevation of all the gas exchange parameters. These results corroborate with the outcomes of Khanna et al.30 in case of M. incognita infested microbial strain treated 45 days old tomato plants. The reason behind this increment might be the upregulation in the synthesis of enzymes involved in violaxanthin pathway (photosynthetic processes).
An elevation in the content of various stress markers or ROS like MDA and H2O2 has been reported in nematode infected plants in present study. Our results find support from the previous studies of Sharma and co-workers23, where MDA and H2O2 were reported to enhance in tomato plants grown under nematode stress. Similar trend of increase in MDA was also reported in the case of nematode inoculated sugar beet plants32. However, the current study also depicts the downregulation in the level of stress markers in biometabolites amended nematode infected tomato plants. Similar decline was also reported in nematode infested Baccopa monnieri plants when treated with Chitinphilus sp. and Streptomyces sp. This down regulation is attributed to the generation of immunity-based cascade by microorganisms so as to mitigate pathogenesis in plants33. Another possible reason behind this down regulation might be the enhancement in the activity of various enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidants11. Earlier reports of Khanna et al.34 also assessed decline in lipid peroxidation and H2O2 in P. aeruginosa and B. gladioli treated nematode infected tomato plants. It was predicted that the decline in stress markers is due to microbe induced enhanced activity of the antioxidant defense system of plants. Furthermore, microorganisms were also reported to produce certain secondary metabolites like siderophores and organic acid that acts as chelators of ROS in plants.
The current work also evaluates an outburst in the specific activity of various antioxidant defense enzymes (CAT, SOD, APOX, POD, PPO and GST) in nematode infected tomato plants. Our results find support from the previous work done on tomato plants, where activity of all the enzymes were enhanced, further reducing the level of ROS that was upregulated in plants because of nematode pathogenesis11. Additionally, enhanced specific activity of SOD, PPO and POD were also reported in Gerbera jamesonii plants infected with nematodes35. The present work also reveals a further increase in activity of all the enzymes in M. incognita infested S. lycopersicum plants after treatment with biometabolites produced by S. hydrogenans in the form of culture cells, supernatant and extract. A rise in the activities of SOD, PPO, CAT and APOX was also found in P. aeruginosa and B. gladioli treated nematode infected tomato plants34. Our results are in accordance with the findings of Gupta et al.36. They stated an increment in the activity of SOD in microbe inoculated nematode infected Withania somnifera plants. Similar incrementation in the activity of PPO was observed in nematode infected tomato plants that were inoculated with Streptomyces sp.37. The main attribute behind this upregulation after amendment of biometabolites produced by S. hydrogenans strain DH-16 might be because of increased protein levels in treated plants in comparison to untreated nematode infected plants.
Along with enzymatic antioxidants, non-enzymatic antioxidants like tocopherol and glutathione content have also been found to be elevated in case of infected plants. Similar findings were reported previously in case of papaya, grapevine, eggplant and tomato plants grown under nematode stress11,38,39. This elevation might be because of ROS scavenging potential of non-enzymatic antioxidants38,40. Our results also depict further elevation in the levels of tocopherol and glutathione in case of biometabolites supplemented nematode infected tomato plants. Similar type of results were reported previously in case of microbial strain supplemented Bacopa monneri plants by Gupta et al.33. Our results also find co-occurrence with our previous findings23. According to literature, treatment of biometabolites produced by microbial strains elevated the content of tocopherol and glutathione in tomato plants. Further, this rise is attributed to the fact that these antioxidants, activated after the treatment with micro-organisms starts acting as ROS scavengers or redox buffers41,42.
Enhancement in the content of various phenolic compounds like total phenols, flavonoids and anthocyanin have also been found in the present study. Previous studies also state that increment in phenolic content is related to the alleviation of stress caused by pathogens43. The level of phenolic compound has been found to increase further after the supplementation of Streptomyces sp. generated biometabolites. The reason behind the elevation might be the role of biometabolites produced by microbes in mitigating stress generated in plants because of nematode infection, as also depicted by reduced number of galls. Our results are in similar lines with the findings of Khanna et al.34, who also reported an increase in phenolic compounds in microbes amended nematode stressed plants. Additionally, supplementation of Chitinophillus sp., Streptomyces sp. and Cellulosimicrobium sp. to W. somnifera resulted in enhanced levels of total phenols and flavonoids. The possible reason behind the enhancement might be the chelating potential of phenolic compounds against biotic stressors. Furthermore, the generation of these compounds also restricts the migration of nematodes. All these findings demonstrate the bioefficacy of metabolites produced by Streptomyces sp. strain DH-16 against M. incognita infected tomato plants by modulating the antioxidative defense system of the host plant.
Methods
Microbial culture
S. hydrogenans strain DH-16 (JX123130) was used as a biocontrol agent in the present study and was procured from the Microbiology Department, GNDU, Amritsar, Punjab44. The pure culture was streaked on SCNA (starch casein nitrate agar) plates and was then incubated at 28 ℃ for 4 days and was kept in reserve at 4 ℃ for further experimental work.
Bioactive metabolites production
The yield of secondary metabolites was carried out by inoculating three stubs (6 mm) of microbial culture from fully grown plate to starch casein nitrate media (50 ml) followed by its agitation at 180 rpm and 28 ℃ in a shaker incubator for 72 h44. After incubation, the cells were separated from broth using filtration and then both culture cells and sterile cell free filtrate (supernatant) were used for further experimentation. Furthermore, active metabolites present in the cell free filtrate were extracted using ethyl acetate and were then concentrated under vacuum with the help of rotary evaporator. The brown-colored residue thus formed was re-dissolved in 0.5% DMSO (dimethyl sulfoxide) solution and was then stored at 4℃ for further experimentation.
Meloidogyne incognita culture
M. incognita culture was obtained from infected roots of brinjal and tomato plants. The culture was screened and identified by studying the perennial pattern of females and then the pure culture was grown in the green house of the department. The egg masses from infected roots were collected and were washed with 1.5% sodium hypochlorite solution followed by subsequent washing in distilled water. The extracted egg masses were then placed in distilled water and were allowed to hatch at 27 ℃, followed by collection of infective second stage juveniles (J2) which were used for experimental studies.
Plant material and treatments
Certified seeds of susceptible variety of S. lycopersicum var. Pusa Ruby were purchased from the market and were surface sterilized by dipping them in 1.5% sodium hypochlorite solution for 1 min, followed by subsequent washing in distilled water. The disinfected seeds were then sown in autoclaved soil and then the seedlings with true leaf stage were transferred into earthen pots containing autoclaved soil. After 2–3 days of transplantation, plants were subjected to different treatments which were C (Control, 0.5% DMSO), NI (Nematode infested with 2J2s/g of soil), CC (1 × 106 Culture cells), CC + NI (1 × 106 Culture cells + 2J2s/g of soil), S (supernatant), S + NI (supernatant + 2J2s/g of soil) and E (extract), E + NI (extract + 2J2s/g of soil). There were five replicates of each treatment and the experiment was terminated after 60 days.
Growth parameters
Various growth parameters like height of plant (root and shoot length) and fresh biomass (root and shoot weight) were assessed. Further, number of galls per plant were also recorded in differently treated plants to check nematode infection in plants.
Photosynthetic pigments
For the estimation of photosynthetic pigments (chl ‘a’; chl ‘b’; total chl and carotenoid content) homogenate was prepared by crushing 1 g of fresh leaf sample in 4 ml 80% acetone solution, which was then subjected to centrifugation for 20 min at 10,000 rpm and 4 ℃ . The debris free filtrate thus formed was further used for measuring its absorbance at wavelengths 645 and 663 nm for chlorophyll content and 480 and 510 nm for carotenoid content using spectrophotometer45,46.
Gaseous exchange parameters
Various gaseous exchange parameters like Pn (Net photosynthetic rate), E (Transpiration rate), Gs (Stomatal conductance) and Ci (Intercellular CO2 rate) were assessed in 60 days old tomato plants. The assessment was done during sunny day with the help of Portable Photosynthesis Measuring System Unit (Li COR-6400, LiCOR Instruments, Lincoln, NE, USA).
Oxidative stress markers
Malondialdehyde (MDA) content
1 g of fresh leaf sample was crushed in 0.1% Trichloroacetic acid (TCA, 5 ml) for the production of homogenate, followed by its centrifugation at 5000 rpm at 4 ℃. The supernatant thus formed was collected and mixed with 20% TCA containing 0.5% Thio barbituric acid (TBA) and the reaction mixture was then subjected to heating in water bath at 95 ℃ for 30 min followed by its cooling in ice cold conditions. Afterwards, the supernatant was separated and its absorbance was recorded at 532 nm47.
Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) content
1 g of fresh leaf sample was crushed in 1% TCA (6 ml) and was then subjected to centrifugation at 12,000 rcf for 15 min. The supernatant thus formed was collected and then 0.5 ml of it was mixed with 1 ml potassium iodide and 1 ml Potassium phosphate buffer of pH 7. The optical density of final reaction mixture was then recorded at 390 nm using Genesys 20 UV visible spectrophotometer. A standard curve was made using H2O2 for further evaluation48.
Antioxidative enzymes
For assessing specific activity of antioxidative enzymes, protein content was required. So, in order to evaluate the protein content as well as antioxidative enzymes, 1 g of fresh leaf sample was homogenised in 3 ml of 0.1 M Potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0). The homogenate thus generated was subjected to centrifugation for 20 min at 13,000 rpm. The protein content was assessed as per Lowry method49 and Bovine Serum Albumen (BSA) was used as the standard for estimation. The specific activity of various antioxidative enzymes like Glutathione-S-Transferase (GST) ; guaiacol peroxidise (GuPOX)); ascorbate peroxidase (APOX); polyphenol oxidase (PPO) ; catalase (CAT) ; and superoxide dismutase (SOD) were also assessed].
GST (EC. 2.5.1.18)
Specific activity of GST was examined by using the protocol given by Habig and Jakoby50. The reaction was started by mixing potassium phosphate buffer (20 mM, pH 7.5); reduced glutathione (20 mM); 1-chloro 2,4-dinitrobenzene (Cdnb, 20 mM) and plant extract. The absorbance was recorded at 340 nm.
GuPOX (EC.1.11.1.7)
Specific activity of GuPOX was assessed as per the methodology proposed by Putter51. The components of reaction mixture include potassium phosphate buffer (20 mM; 7.0); freshly prepared guaiacol solution (10 mM); hydrogen peroxide (124 mM) and plant extract. The increment in optical density was noted at 436 nm.APOX (EC.1.11.1.11).
Specific activity of APOX was calculated by the methodology given by Nakano and Asada52. The reaction mixture consists of ascorbate (0.5 mM); potassium phosphate buffer (50 mM; 7.0); hydrogen peroxide (2 mM) and plant extract. The absorbance was recorded at 290 nm.
PPO (EC.1.14.18.1)
The specific activity of PPO was determined using the protocol given by Esterbauer et al.53. The components of reaction mixture include potassium phosphate buffer (0.1 M; pH 7.0); catechol (0.1 M) and enzyme extract. The absorbance of reaction mixture was recorded at wavelength 412 nm.
CAT (EC.1.11.1.6)
The specific activity of CAT was determined using the standard protocol given by Aebi54. The components of reaction mixture involve potassium phosphate buffer (50 mM, pH 7.0); hydrogen peroxide (20 mM) and plant extract. Dismutation of hydrogen peroxide resulted in decrease in absorbance at 240 nm.
SOD (EC.1.15.1.1)
The specific activity of SOD was examined by the procedure given by Kono55. The components of reaction mixture include sodium carbonate buffer (50 mM); hydroxylamine hydrochloride (1 mM; pH 6.0); Triton-X 100 (0.03%); nitro blue tertrazolium (NBT, 24 µM), ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and plant extract. The enhancement in optical density was recorded at 540 nm.
Non-enzymatic antioxidants
Tocopherol and total glutathione content were also assessed in the current study. For assessing both the parameters the homogenate was prepared by homogenising 1 g of fresh leaf sample in 50 mM Tris buffer (10 ml; pH 10) and was then subjected to centrifugation for 15 min at 12,000 rcf, followed by collection of supernatant, which was then used for evaluating Tocopherol and total glutathione content.
Tocopherol content
The supernatant (0.5 ml) collected was mixed with double distilled water (0.5 ml) and absolute ethanol (0.5 ml), followed by vigorous shaking. Xylene (0.5 ml) was added to the reaction mixture and was then subjected to centrifugation for 10 min at 3000 rcf, that results in the formation of two layers. The upper xylene layer was collected and 2,4,6-tripyridyl-s-triazine (TPTZ) was added to it. The absorbance of reaction mixture thus formed was recorded at 600 nm56.
Total glutathione content
The supernatant (0.1 ml) collected was mixed with methanol (4 ml) and 5,5′-dithiobis-(2-nitrobenzoic acid) (50 µl) and was incubated for 15 min at room temperature, followed by centrifugation for 15 min at 3000 rcf. The optical density of resultant mixture thus formed was recorded at 412 nm57.
Phenolic compounds
Flavonoid content
The homogenate for the evaluation of flavonoid content was prepared by crushing fresh leaf sample in 80% ethanol solution, followed by centrifugation for 20 min at 10,000 rpm. The supernatant (100 µl) thus formed was mixed with methanol (2.9 ml), aluminium chloride (100 µl), 5% sodium potassium tartarate (100 µl) and distilled water (500 µl). The reaction mixture thus formed was subjected to vigorous shaking and was incubated for 30 min. The optical density of final mixture was recorded at 415 nm wavelength using spectrophotometer58.
Anthocyanin content
For estimation of anthocyanin content, fresh plant sample was crushed in acidified methanol, containing (V/V/V) methanol, distilled water and hydrochloric acid (79:20:1). The homogenate formed was incubated overnight, followed by centrifugation at 10,000 rcf for 15 min. The optical density of supernatant was then recorded at 530 and 657 nm59.
Total Phenolic content
Homogenate for determination of total phenolic content was prepared using 80% methanol, followed by centrifugation at 10,000 rpm for 20 min. The supernatant was separated from pellet and 100 µl supernatant was mixed with 2.9 ml distilled water, 500 µl FC reagent:water (1:1) and 2 ml of 20% sodium carbonate, followed by vigorous shaking. Then the absorbance of final reaction mixture was recorded at 760 nm60.
Microscopy
Cell viability
For assessing cell viability, root tips of fresh S. lycopersicum plants were dipped in 50 µM Propidium iodide (PI) solution and then were incubated at room temperature for 10–15 min. The extra PI was removed with the help of double distilled water. The stained root tips were then mounted on slide and was observed under Nikon AIR Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope, under the excitation and emission wavelength of 543 and 617 nm respectively.
Nuclear damage
For assessing nuclear damage, fresh root tips were dipped in 4,6-diamino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) and were incubated for 15 min in dark followed by washing in deionized water. Root tips were mounted on slide and was observed under Nikon AIR Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope, at an excitation and emission wavelength of 358 and 461 nm respectively.
Hydrogen peroxide localization
For assessing hydrogen peroxide localization, fresh root tips of plants were immersed in Dichlorofluorescein-diacetate (DCF-DA) for 20 min under dark conditions followed by washing in deionized water. Samples were then mounted on glass slide and were observed under Nikon AIR Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope, at an excitation and emission wavelength of 485 and 535 nm respectively.
Statistical analysis
All the calculations (one-way Anova and Tukey’s test) were performed by using SPSS software and by self-coded office excel software.
Ethical statement
Experimental research on plant complies with relevant institutional, national and international guidelines and legislation.
Conclusion
M. incognita infestation in S. lycopersicum plants has resulted in impaired growth attributes that is also related to enhanced production of ROS (oxidative stress markers) and modulation of antioxidative defense system of host plant. However, the destruction caused by RKN infestation can be alleviated by the application of microbial strains that exhibit nematicidal properties. Further, the microbial strains are also involved in supressing the level of stress markers and thus helps in maintaining the normal physiology of plants even under stressful conditions by upregulating the level of various enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidants in plants. Thus, all these finding prove that S. hydrogenans strain DH-16 possess the exquisite potential for plant growth promotion and mitigation of nematode stress in plants. However, further research is required to understand the molecular mechanism involved in mitigation of nematode stress in plants after microbial supplementation.
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study will be made available from the corresponding author upon request for replication purposes.
References
Sudhakar, P. & Purushotham, K. Evaluation of F1 hybrids of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L). J. Res. ANGRAU. 37, 77–81 (2009).
Afifah, E. N., Murti, R. H. & Nuringtyas, T. R. Metabolomics approach for the analysis of resistance of four tomato genotypes (Solanum lycopersicum L) to Root-Knot Nematodes (Meloidogyne incognita). Open Life Sci. 14, 141–149 (2019).
Sikora, R. A., Coyne, D., Hallmann, J. & Timper, P. Plant Parasitic Nematodes in Subtropical and Tropical Agriculture; Cabi: Beijing, China, (2018).
Ibrahim, H. M. M., Ahmad, E. M., Martínez-Medina, A. & Aly, M. A. M. Effective approaches to study the plant-root knot nematode interaction. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 141, 332–342 (2019).
Davis, E. Getting to the roots of parasitism by nematodes. Trends Parasitol. 20, 134–141 (2004).
Singh, R. & Phulera, S. Plant Parasitic Nematodes: the Hidden Enemies of Farmers (Excel India Publishers, New Delhi, 2015).
Eves-vandenAkker, S. & Birch, P. R. J. Opening the effector protein toolbox for plant-parasitic cyst nematode interactions. Mol. Plant. 9, 1451–1453 (2016).
Jacquet, M. et al. Variation in resistance to the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita in tomato genotypes bearing the Mi gene. Plant Pathol. 54, 93–99 (2005).
Kyndt, T., Vieira, P., Gheysen, G. & de Almeida-Engler, J. Nematode feeding sites: Unique organs in plant roots. Planta 238, 807–818 (2013).
Coyne, D. L. et al. Plant-parasitic nematodes and food security in sub-Saharan Africa. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 56, 381–403 (2018).
Sharma, N. et al. Insights into the role of Streptomyces hydrogenans as the plant growth promoter, photosynthetic pigment enhancer and biocontrol agent against Meloidogyne incognita in Solanum lycopersicum seedlings. Plants. 9(9), 1109 (2020).
Doolotkeldieva, T., Bobusheva, S. & Konurbaeva, M. Effect of streptomyces biofertilizer to soil fertility and rhizosphere’s functional biodiversity of agricultural plants. Adv. Microbiol. 5(7), 1179–1188 (2015).
Rey, T. & Dumas, B. Plenty is no plague: Streptomyces symbiosis with crops. Trends Plant Sci. 22(1), 30–37 (2017).
Adegboye, M. F. & Babalola, O. O. Taxonomy and ecology of antibiotic producing actnomycetes. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 7(15), 2255–2261 (2012).
Jog, R., Nareshkumar, G. & Rajkumar, S. Enhancing soil health and plant growth promotion by actinomycetes. In Plant Groth Promoting Actinobacteria (eds Gopalakrishnan, S. et al.) 33–45 (Singapore, Springer, 2016).
Abdullah, Z. K. et al. Suppressive effect of secondary metabolites from Streptomyces plumbeus isolate F31D against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici, the causal agent of Fusarium wilt of tomato. J. Gen. Plant Pathol. 87(6), 335–343 (2021).
Sakineh, A., Ayme, S., Akram, S. & Naser, S. Streptomyces strains modulate dynamics of soil bacterial communities and their efficacy in disease suppression caused by Phytophthora capsici. Sci. Rep. 11(1), 1–14 (2021).
Ravindra, H. et al. Eco-friendly management of root-knot nematodes using acacia compost and bioagents in brinjal. Pak. J. Nematol. 32(1), 33–38 (2014).
Tiwari, S., Pandey, S., Chauhan, P. S. & Pandey, R. Biocontrol agents in co-inoculation manages root knot nematode [Meloidogyne incognita (Kofoid & White) Chitwood] and enhances essential oil content in Ocimum basilicum L. Ind. Crop Prod. 97, 292–301 (2017).
Abd El-Aal, E. M. et al. In vivo and in vitro management of Meloidogyne incognita (Tylenchida: Heteroderidae) using rhizosphere bacteria, Pseudomonas spp and Serratia spp compared with oxamyl. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 28(9), 4876–4883 (2021).
Azhagumurugan, C. & Rajan, M. K. Efficacy of root knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita) on the growth characteristics of black gram (Vigna mungo) treated with leaf extract of Magilam (Mimusops elengi). Am. Euras. J. Sci. Res. 9, 175–181 (2014).
Gupta, R., Saikia, S. K. & Pandey, R. Bioconsortia augments antioxidant and yield in Matricaria recutita L Against Meloidogyne incognita (Kofoid and white) Chitwood infestation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. Ind. Sect. B: Biol. Sci. 87, 335–342 (2015).
Sharma, N., Manhas, R. K., Bhardwaj, R. & Ohri, P. Bioefficacy of Bio-metabolites Produced by Streptomyces sp Strain MR-14 in Ameliorating Meloidogyne incognita Stress in Solanum lycopersicum Seedlings. J. Plant Growth Regula. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/500344-021-10518-9 (2021).
Mekete, T., Hallmann, J., Kiewnick, S. & Sikora, R. Endophytic bacteria from Ethiopian coffee plants and their potential to antagonise Meloidogyne incognita. Nematology 11(1), 117–127 (2009).
Galvez, A., del Amor, F. M., Ros, C. & López-Marín, J. New traits to identify physiological responses induced by different rootstocks after root-knot nematode inoculation (Meloidogyne incognita) in sweet pepper. Crop Prot. 119, 126–133 (2019).
Yang, C. M., Yang, M. M., Hsu, J. M. & Jane, W. N. Herbivorous insect causes deficiency of pigment-protein complexes in an oval-pointed cecidomyiid gall of Machilus thunbergii leaf. Bot. Bull. Acad. Sin. 44, 315–321 (2003).
Abd-El-Khair, H., El-Nagdi, W. M. A., Youssef, M. M. A., Abd-Elgawad, M. M. M. & Dawood, M. G. Protective effect of Bacillus subtilis, B. pumilus, and Pseudomonas fluorescens isolates against root knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita on cowpea. Bull. Natl. Res. Centre 43, 1–7 (2019).
Sharma, M., Jasrotia, S., Ohri, P. & Manhas, R. K. Nematicidal potential of Streptomyces antibioticus strain M7 against Meloidogyne incognita. AMB Express 9, 168 (2019).
Goulart, R. D. R., Terra, W. C., Salgado, S. M. D. L., Alves, J. D., Campos, V. P., Fatobene, B. J. D. R., Marchiori, P. E. R., de Souza, S. R. & Oliveira, R. D. A. D. L. Meloidogyne paranaensis and M. exigua alter coffee physiology. Nematology. 21, 459–467 (2018).
Khanna, K. et al. Impact of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in the orchestration of Lycopersicon esculentum Mill resistance to plant parasitic nematodes: A metabolomic approach to evaluate defense responses under field conditions. Biomolecules 9(11), 676 (2019).
Golinowski, W. & Grymaszewska, G. Reakcja tkanek korzenia na porażenie nicieniami z rodzaju Heterodera. Kosmos 40(4), 319–329 (1991).
Korayem, A. M., El-Bassiouny, H. M. S, El-Monem, A. A. & Mohamed, M. M. M. Physiological and biochemical changes in different sugar beet genotypes infected with root-knot nematode. Acta Physiol. Plant 34, 1847–1861 (2012).
Gupta, R., Singh, A., Ajayakumar, P. V. & Pandey, R. Microbial interference mitigates Meloidogyne incognita mediated oxidative stress and augments bacoside content in Bacopa monnieri L. Microbiol. Res. 199, 67–78 (2017).
Khanna, K. et al. Role of plant growth promoting Bacteria (PGPRs) as biocontrol agents of Meloidogyne incognita through improved plant defense of Lycopersicon esculentum. Plant Soil. 436, 325–345 (2019).
Manju, P., & Subramanian, S. Management of root knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria Bacillus spp. on Gerbera jamesonii. In III International Symposium on Underutilized Plant Species 1241, 487–492 2015.
Gupta, R., Singh, A., Srivastava, M., Gupta, M. & Pandey, R. Augmentation of systemic resistance and secondary metabolites by chitinolytic microbes in Withania somnifera against Meloidogyne incognita. Biocontrol. Sci. Technol. 26, 1626–1642 (2016).
Ma, Y. Y., Li, Y. L., Lai, H. X., Guo, Q. & Xue, Q. H. Effects of two strains of Streptomyces on root-zone microbes and nematodes for biocontrol of root-knot nematode disease in tomato. Appl. Soil Ecol. 112, 34–41 (2017).
Kesba, H. H. & El-Beltagi, H. S. Biochemical changes in grape rootstocks resulted from humic acid treatments in relation to nematode infection. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed. 2, 287–293 (2012).
Afifi, A., Al-Sayed, A., Mahfoud, N. & Farahat, A. Enzymatic and non-enzymatic oxidants and antioxidants involved in defense mechanisms against root-knot, reniform and citrus nematodes in their hosts. Egypt. J. Agron. 13, 172–188 (2014).
Jimenez, A., Hernandez, J. A., del Rio, L. A. & Sevilla, F. Evidence for the presence of the ascorbate-glutathione cycle in mitochondria and peroxisomes of pea leaves. Plant Physiol. 114, 275–284 (1997).
Mollavali, M. et al. Flavonol glucoside and antioxidant enzyme biosynthesis affected by mycorrhizal fungi in various cultivars of onion (Allium cepa L). J. Agric. Food Chem. 64, 71–77 (2016).
Ray, S., Singh, V., Singh, S., Sarma, B. K. & Singh, H. B. Biochemical and histochemical analyses revealing endophytic Alcaligenes faecalis mediated suppression of oxidative stress in Abelmoschus esculentus challenged with Sclerotium rolfsii. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 109, 430–441 (2016).
Patel, V. S., Shukla, Y. & Dhruve, J. Influence of root knot nematode (Meloidogyne spp) on phenolic acid profile in root of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L). Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 6, 840–848 (2017).
Kaur, T. & Manhas, R. K. Antifungal, insecticidal, and plant growth promoting potential of Streptomyces hydrogenans DH16. J. Basic Microbiol. 54, 1175–1185 (2014).
Arnon, D. I. Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts Polyphenoloxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiol. 24, 1–5 (1949).
Maclachlan, S. & Zalik, S. Plastid structure, chlorophyll concentration, and free amino acid composition of a chlorophyll mutant of barley. Can. J. Bot. 41, 1053–1062 (1963).
Heath, R. L. & Packer, L. Photoperoxidation in isolated chloroplasts: I Kinetics and stoichiometry of fatty acid peroxidation. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 125, 189–198 (1968).
Velikova, V., Yordanov, I. & Edreva, A. Oxidative stress and some antioxidant systems in acid rain-treated bean plants: Protective role of exogenous polyamines. Plant Sci. 151, 59–66 (2000).
Lowry, O. H., Rosebrough, N. J., Farr, A. L. & Randall, R. J. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J. Biol. Chem. 193, 265–275 (1951).
Habig, W. H. & Jakoby, W. B. Assays for differentiation of glutathione S-Transferases. Methods Enzymol. 77, 398–405 (1981).
Pütter, J. Peroxidases. In Methods of Enzymatic Analysis (ed. Bergmeyer, H.U.) 685–690 (Academic Press, New York, NY, USA, 1974).
Nakano, Y. & Asada, K. Hydrogen peroxide is scavenged by ascorbate-specific peroxidase in spinach chloroplasts. Plant Cell Physiol. 22, 867–880 (1981).
Esterbauer, H., Schwarzl, E. & Hayn, M. A. rapid assay for catechol oxidase and laccase using 2-nitro-5-thiobenzoic acid. Anal. Biochem. 77, 486–494 (1977).
Aebi, H. Catalase. In Methods of Enzymatic Analysis (ed. Bergmeyer, H.U.) 673–680 (Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1974).
Kono, Y. Generation of superoxide radical during autoxidation of hydroxylamine and an assay for superoxide dismutase. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 186, 189–195 (1978).
Martinek, R. G. Method for the determination of vitamin E (total tocopherols) in serum. Clin. Chem. 10, 1078–1086 (1964).
Sedlak, J. & Lindsay, R. H. Estimation of total, protein-bound, and nonprotein sulfhydryl groups in tissue with Ellman’s reagent. Anal. Biochem. 25, 192–205 (1968).
Lamaison, J. & Carnet, A. Contents of main flavonoids flowers Crataegeus monogyna Jacq and Crataegeus laevigata (Poiret DC) at different developmental stages. Pharm. Acta Helv. 65, 315–320 (1990).
Mancinelli, A. L. Photoregulation of anthocyanin synthesis: VIII effect of light pretreatments. Plant Physiol. 75, 447–453 (1984).
Malik, C. P. & Singh, M. B. Plant Enzymology and Histo-Enzymology (Kalyani Publishers, 1980).
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to extend their sincere appreciation to DST-PURSE Scheme for providing financial assistance.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
N.S.: Conceptualization, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, software, writing- original draft preparation, writing- review and editing. R.K.M.: Resources, Writing- review and editing. P.O: Conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, investigation, project administration, resources, supervision, validation, visualization, writing- review and editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Sharma, N., Manhas, R.K. & Ohri, P. Streptomyces hydrogenans strain DH-16 alleviates negative impact of Meloidogyne incognita stress by modifying physio-biochemical attributes in Solanum lycopersicum plants. Sci Rep 12, 15214 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-19636-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-19636-0
This article is cited by
-
Biological control of the root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita) on eggplants with various chitinase-producing Streptomyces strains
European Journal of Plant Pathology (2023)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.
