Abstract
Polymer composites with high dielectric constant and low loss tangent are highly regarded as substrates for modern highspeed electronics. In this work, we analyze the highfrequency dielectric properties of two types of composites based on polypropylene infused with highdielectricconstant microparticles. Two types of fillers are used: commercial ceramics or titanium oxide (TiO_{2}) with different concentrations. The key observation is that adding the fillers causes an increase of dielectric constants by around 100% (for highest loading) up to 4.2 and 3.4, for microceramics and TiO_{2} based composites, respectively. Interestingly, for the TiO_{2} composite, the loss tangent depends on the filler loading volume, whereas the other composite has a slightly increasing tendency, however, being at the level ~ 10^{–3}. To explain the experimental results, a theoretical model determined by microwave reflection and transmission through a representative volume element is proposed, which allows the investigation of the impact of volume ratio, grain shape, aggregation, and size on the loss tangent and permittivity evolution. This approach could be used for modeling other low dielectric loss materials with inclusions.
Introduction
Polymer composites have gained significant attention during the past decade due to their numerous applications in modern life and industry. A vital development sector is the electronic devices working at high frequencies, whose miniaturization is still an unsolved issue due to the requirement to produce new dielectric substrates. The polymer matrix is a promising candidate for substrates because of its flexibility, lightweight, low cost, largescale production, and high electrical breakdown strength. However, polymer based substrates usually have rather poor dielectric properties in terms of low loss. All the features are crucial for producing new materials with high dielectric constant and low loss tangent that may serve as dielectric substrates for fabricating new RF electronics components, e.g., sensors, antennas, capacitors, and FET transistors. Suitable lowloss materials should exhibit real permittivity > 2 and tangent loss < 10^{–2}.
One of the main strategies to increase the dielectric constant in polymer composites is to embed ceramic fillers with a high dielectric constant and intense spontaneous polarization into a polymer matrix. For example, in polyimide composite with TiO_{2} nanoparticles, an increase in the dielectric constant of approximately 10% was observed (for a concentration of 7% TiO_{2}) and the loss tangent of the composite has grown approximately four times^{1}. The dielectric constant with value 4.4 for the TiO_{2}—polydimethylsiloxane compound was measured for a high concentration of inclusion reaching 30 wt%^{2}. Implementation of the same concentration of TiO_{2} in PVDF polymer resulted in \({\varepsilon }_{\mathrm{r}}\) value of about 10^{3}. In turn, the record value of the dielectric constant (\({\varepsilon }_{\mathrm{r}}\) = 133) was obtained for BaTiO3 cyanoethylated cellulose polymer composite for the 51% wt. concentration of barium ceramics^{4}. Recently, electrically tunable dielectrics such as Ba_{0.6}Sr_{0.4}TiO_{3} ceramics have been widely investigated as a filler in polymer. For instance, a PVDF composite with 40% wt. Ba_{0.6}Sr_{0.4}TiO_{3} reached the value 40 of the dielectric constant^{5}. However, this strategy has limitations due to the filler loading threshold. Higher concentrations lead to lower processability and mechanical flexibility^{6}. The influence of grain size, cluster formation, or the correlation between different charge parameters and changes in the loss tangent is not yet described in the literature. This information can be obtained by correlating experimental results with theoretical calculations.
The problem of microwave propagation through twophase composite has been widely studied theoretically in the literature^{7}. One of the popular approaches is the use of effective medium theory^{8}—a composite is replaced by a medium of isotropic dielectric permittivity, which requires the assumption that the grains in the composite are much smaller than the radiation wavelength. There are many analytical models to calculate the effective composite permittivity—one of the most famous formulas is the Maxwell–Garnett model^{9,10}, which assumes the spherical shape of the inclusions and no interaction between them. Multiple extensions of the Maxwell–Garnett model exist, including ellipsoidal shapes and providing better accuracy—a practical overview of the formulas has recently been reported in^{11}. However, in the case of composites with a significant permittivity contrast, a large concentration of inclusions, irregular shapes of inclusions, or their clustering, it is not reliable to estimate the effective composite permittivity using only analytical formulas^{12,13,14}. Therefore, a better approach is to perform fullwave electromagnetic simulations. The reported calculations usually consider either a capacitor in the quasistatic regime with a welldefined electric potential^{12,15,16,17} or microwave propagation through a slab or periodic unit cell of the composite^{13,14,18,19}. Multiple methods have been used in the literature to define and extract effective composite permittivity \({\varepsilon }_{\mathrm{eff}}\) with such simulation. The most reliable approach involves calculating the propagation constant \(\gamma\) and characteristic impedance \(Z\) of the effective medium from the reflection \({S}_{11}\) and transmission \({S}_{21}\) parameters^{14,18}, which can be transformed to the equivalent effective permittivity \({\varepsilon }_{\mathrm{eff}}\) and permeability \({\mu }_{\mathrm{eff}}\). Such a procedure does not involve any quasistatic approximations—the calculated effective parameters are strictly related to the scattering and transmission properties of the composite.
The impact of the grain shape on the effective composite permittivity has previously been studied in the literature, but only theoretically and to a limited degree. Reports have concerned ellipsoidal particles with different aspect ratios^{20,21}, cylinders^{22}, and inclusion shapes containing edges, including twodimensional polyhedra^{15,23,24}, threedimensional cuboids^{12,13,14,18}, and irregular solid figures^{13,14,25}. Some reports also take into account the effect of grain disorder^{12,14,24} (which increases interparticle interactions^{26}) or even clustering^{13,15}. In each of the listed cases, the real part of the effective permittivity reported is greater than indicated by the wellestablished Maxwell–Garnett mixing law^{9,10}. However, the literature usually assumes that the grain size has no or negligible impact on the permittivity, even though the inclusion dimensions affect their average separation at the fixed volume fraction. In general, the effective medium approximation premise might be invalid if the wavelength is too short.
This work presents a study of the dielectric properties of two types of polypropylene composites infused with microceramics or TiO_{2} nanocrystals. The dielectric constant and a loss tangent of the composites were investigated at 5 GHz or/and 10 GHz. We demonstrate a new approach to simulate the effective permittivity, which provides a better interpretation and generality of the composite microwave properties. The method involves the calculation of Sparameters corresponding to a representative volume element of the composite using a commercially available fullwave simulator, followed by the transformation of the matrix to the four effective permittivities—separate for phase and impedancerelated microwave behaviors in two opposite propagation directions. The approach can be applied to composites with arbitrary inclusions distribution and shapes and provides a natural criterion for the effective medium theory applicability. We comprehensively investigated the impact of volume ratio, grain shape, aggregation, and size on the evolution of the loss tangent and dielectric constant using the proposed simulation method.
Methods
Samples and measurement details
In this work, two types of polymer composites were manufactured: polypropylene (PP) filled with microceramics and polypropylene with TiO_{2} nanocrystals. PP was purchased from Resinex in the form of a powder. The TiO_{2} nanocrystals (10 nm diameter) provided by MkNano are also in the form of a powder. The microceramics grains were prepared in a ball mill by grinding a ceramic wafer, purchased from Skyworks, and next the powder was divided into fractions with grain sizes: 20, 25, 32, 56, 60, 90, and 100 um.
The polymer composites of PP with ceramics powder or TiO_{2} were drymixed in a lab mixer. We prepared samples with mass fractions in the range of 10–60 wt% for ceramics/PP and 5–40 wt% for TiO_{2}/PP composites. Then, the prepared blends were hotpressed on a hydraulic press with two heating plates heated to 260 °C and pressed with a pressure of approximately 1.7 MPa. To increase accuracy and check repeatability of the results, several samples of each type were prepared.
The samples have thickness in the range from 0.8 to 1.5 mm and lateral dimensions (irregular) of about 40 mm × 40 mm. Measurements of their inplane permittivity and the dielectric loss tangent have been performed employing a well known split post dielectric resonator technique^{27} at frequencies 5 GHz and 10 GHz. The permittivity and dielectric loss tangent measurement errors, mainly associated with uncertainties in the thickness of samples, were typically in the range of 3–5% because the samples have not been machined after pressing.
For a clear interpretation of experimental data and comparison to theoretical studies, all weight fractions \(wt\%\) were converted to the corresponding volume fractions \(f\), using the formula^{28}:
where we used the densities \({\rho }_{\mathrm{m}}\) = 0.90 g/cm^{3} of the matrix (polypropylene) and the densities \({\rho }_{\mathrm{i}}\) of the inclusions: 4.17 g/cm^{3} for microceramics and 3.89 g/cm^{3} for TiO_{2} nanocrystals, respectively.
Computational model motivation and derivation
The most strict and direct method for describing the microwave propagation properties of composites involves calculating the effective propagation constant \(\gamma\) and characteristic impedance \(Z\) of a representative volume element. The evaluated parameters can be further transformed to the effective microwave material parameters. While the approach is appropriate for the study of composite as a part of microwave devices and waveguides, the most relevant calculation procedure reported so far^{14,18} has two downsides:

Although the proposed formulas enable evaluating the effective parameters \(\gamma\) and \(Z\) from the microwave reflection \({S}_{11}\) and transmission parameters \({S}_{21}\), they assume perfect symmetry of the composite representative volume element. In other words, the same reflection (\({S}_{11}={S}_{22}\)) and transmission (\({S}_{21}={S}_{12}\)) parameters at both sides of the unit cell have to be either approximated or guaranteed,

In general, using a single complex parameter—effective permittivity \({\varepsilon }_{\mathrm{eff}}\)—can be insufficient to describe microwave propagation through a multiphase composite. Strictly, the propagation is determined by two complex numbers: \(\gamma\) and \(Z\). In literature, this issue is resolved by evaluating a possibly nonunit effective permeability \({\mu }_{\mathrm{eff}}\)^{18}, even if the applied materials are nonmagnetic. However, an introduction of fictitious magnetic properties is counterintuitive and complicates the design of RF devices.
This paper proposes a simulation model based on the composite’s representative periodic volume element (Fig. 1). The top and bottom boundaries are set to be excitation ports of the TEM wave, and periodic boundary conditions are placed on the sidewalls. The volume element can include an arbitrary number of inclusions, which can intersect the sidewalls but cannot cross the ports—it is assumed that the domain at the ports and behind them is uniform and the same as the composite matrix. Thus, the studied problem is equivalent to plane wave propagation in the composite matrix and its perpendicular incidence onto a virtual, infinite layer, including immersed inclusions. Analysis of microwave transmission through the representative layer enables the study of effective propagation properties of the entire composite, provided that the layer is sufficiently thick to guarantee statistical averaging.
To study the propagation properties of the composite volume element, we evaluate its transmission matrix \(\hat{\user2{T}}\), as defined and derived in Supplementary Information:
where \(Z=\sqrt{{{\mu }_{0}\mu }_{\mathrm{m}}}/\sqrt{{{\varepsilon }_{0}\varepsilon }_{\mathrm{m}}}\) denotes the characteristic impedance at the layer boundary (where \({\varepsilon }_{m}\), \({\mu }_{m}\)—relative permittivity and permeability of the composite matrix, \({\varepsilon }_{0}\), \({\mu }_{0}\)—vacuum absolute permittivity and permeability) and \({S}_{11}\), \({S}_{12}\), \({S}_{21}\), \({S}_{22}\) are the Sparameters of the volume element. As the two eigenvalues of the \(\hat{\user2{T}}\) matrix are not degenerate, the matrix is diagonalizable and can be written in the following general form:
where we set \(d\) equal to the thickness of the layer. Matrix \(\hat{\user2{T}}\) in Eq. (3) can be interpreted as the transmission matrix of an effective medium with separate characteristic impedances \({Z}_{\mathrm{eff}}^{(+)}\), \({Z}_{\mathrm{eff}}^{()}\) and propagation constants \({\gamma }_{\mathrm{eff}}^{(+)}\), \({\gamma }_{\mathrm{eff}}^{()}\) for two propagation directions. In general, the parameters indexed with “ + ” and “−” might be different—if the representative layer is not symmetrical. The above characteristic impedances and propagation constants could now be transformed to the effective permittivity and permeability of the representative composite layer. However, for more straightforward interpretation and application, it is beneficial to set \({\mu }_{\mathrm{eff}}=1\), and define separate effective permittivities corresponding to the \(\gamma_{{{\text{eff}}}}^{\left( + \right)}\), \(\gamma_{{{\text{eff}}}}^{\left(  \right)}\) (phaserelated) and \(Z_{{{\text{eff}}}}^{\left( + \right)}\), \(Z_{{{\text{eff}}}}^{\left(  \right)}\) (impedancerelated) parameters:
where \({k}_{0}=2\pi /{\lambda }_{0}\) is the phase constant in vacuum. Note that in the case of a uniform medium, all the above four effective permittivities are equal. The four permittivities (Eq. 4) can be evaluated for an arbitrary composite, provided that the impact of interference effects on power transmission is negligible (most of the power is transmitted with TEM waves). If the four permittivities are similar, this indicates the applicability of the effective medium theory for a specific composite. If the phaserelated \({\varepsilon }_{\mathrm{eff}}^{\gamma +}\), \({\varepsilon }_{\mathrm{eff}}^{\gamma }\) and impedancerelated \({\varepsilon }_{\mathrm{eff}}^{Z+}\), \({\varepsilon }_{\mathrm{eff}}^{Z}\) permittivities were significantly different, and separate effective dielectric constants would have to be used to match impedances between two media (or waveguides) and on the purpose of attenuation or phase change study.
Two aspects should be taken into consideration when evaluating the effective dielectric constants (Eq. 4) of the composite. First, the effective permittivity of a representative finitesized volume element depends on the random distribution of inclusions and, additionally, on the microwave polarization direction, resulting in an anisotropic dielectric constant. The smaller the considered supercell, the more significant impact of cell periodicity and anisotropy on the results^{16}. However, the effective isotropic permittivity can be evaluated as the mean value over multiple random structures and all components of the anisotropic permittivity; this approach leads to the averaging of all statistical fluctuations^{12,15,16,30}. Secondly, we recorded that the impedancerelated permittivities \({\varepsilon }_{\mathrm{eff}}^{Z+}\) and \({\varepsilon }_{\mathrm{eff}}^{Z}\) can depend on the direction (sign) of microwave propagation due to supercell asymmetry. In the case of lowloss composites, the difference between \({\varepsilon }_{\mathrm{eff}}^{Z+}\) and \({\varepsilon }_{\mathrm{eff}}^{Z}\) is primarily in the imaginary part. However, we did not observe any noticeable difference between \({\varepsilon }_{\mathrm{eff}}^{\gamma +}\) and \({\varepsilon }_{\mathrm{eff}}^{\gamma }\) in our studies. Additionally, we checked that if the permittivities \({\varepsilon }_{\mathrm{eff}}^{Z+}\) and \({\varepsilon }_{\mathrm{eff}}^{Z}\) corresponding to both propagation directions are averaged, one obtains the correct permittivity value—very close to \({\varepsilon }_{\mathrm{eff}}^{\gamma +}\) and \({\varepsilon }_{\mathrm{eff}}^{\gamma }\) in both real and imaginary parts. Therefore, to study composite's effective permittivity with a given inclusions concentration, we generated five pseudorandom supercells and evaluated each of the four permittivities (Eq. 4) for the two perpendicular axes: x and y (parallel to the cube walls). Phaserelated \({\varepsilon }_{\mathrm{eff}}^{\gamma }\) and impedancerelated \({\varepsilon }_{\mathrm{eff}}^{Z}\) permittivities were evaluated as the averages over 20 individual values: for two propagation directions (signs “+” and “−”), for two axes (x and y), and for each of the five supercells:
where \(n\) denotes supercells and \(N\) = 5 is the number of supercells.
We implemented all computational models in the COMSOL Multiphysics 5.4 software^{29}, based on the finiteelement method (FEM)—the electromagnetic field vectors were evaluated on a discrete set of points in the 3D space. The solution between the points was interpolated using quadratic order basis functions. In the models, the maximal distance between the mesh points was equal to 0.1 of the supercell side length, which was much lower than the microwave wavelength at 5 GHz (60 mm in vacuum). In the case of inclusions with edges, we used a dense mesh at each edge with a maximum point separation equal to 0.1 of the edge length, and the growth rate of the mesh element was equal to 1.5. This provided a proper description of the electromagnetic field localized on the edges and corners of the inclusions.
Results and discussion
Ceramics/polypropylene composite
Effect of the filler fraction
The results of the dielectric constant and loss tangent measurements for PPfilled commercial microceramics are shown in Fig. 2 (see dots). We observed that the dielectric constant increases with the ceramics concentration and reaches 4.2 for the maximal filler concentration. In the case of the loss tangent, we recorded a significant increase to about ~ 10^{–3} at the filler volume fraction of 5%; however, no further evolution was observed at greater filler concentrations. The physical origin of the observed increase in real permittivity can be explained in terms of the wellknown polarization mechanism^{10}. Suppose the composite is located in an external electric field. In this case, dipole moments are induced within each inclusion, which can be interpreted as the induction of effective charges on the grains’ surfaces. As a result, the electric field distribution in the composite is affected, which is seen by the microwave as a medium with new effective permittivity, provided that the wavelength is sufficiently large. The alternating electric field can also interact with current carriers leading to Joule heating. Additionally, energy dissipation due to nonresonant interaction between electric field and phonons can occur—within threequantum, fourquantum, and quasiDebye loss mechanisms^{31}. To quantitatively understand the evolution of measured dielectric parameters, we performed a study using a new simulation method, which enabled us to include the effects of the fillers’ geometrical structure, such as the formation of agglomerates in the prepared composite and grain size.
The computational permittivity of the composite was evaluated separately on the grounds of the effective propagation constants (“phaserelated”) and the grounds of the effective impedance (“impedancerelated”)—as defined in Eq. (5). Each of the studied supercells contained N = 100 spherical grains with diameter d = 56 µm (Fig. 1a), and the corresponding side length a of the supercell was evaluated using the equation:
where \(f\) stands for the volume fraction of the inclusions and \({V}_{\mathrm{i}}=4\pi /3\cdot {\left(d/2\right)}^{3}\) is the volume of a single inclusion. We used isotropic dielectric parameters \(\varepsilon_{{\text{m}}}^\prime\) = 2.17, \({\text{tan }} \delta_{{\text{m}}}\)= 1.4 × 10^{–4} for the matrix and \(\varepsilon_{{\text{i}}}^{\prime}\) = 34.5, \({\text{tan }} \delta_{{\text{i}}}\)= 1.0 × 10^{–4} for the inclusions. The calculated sets of permittivities \({\varepsilon }_{\mathrm{eff}}^{\gamma }\) and \({\varepsilon }_{\mathrm{eff}}^{Z}\) for grains volume fraction \(f\) are presented in Fig. 2. The convergence of the simulation results using N = 100 inclusions and the insignificance of the statistical fluctuations caused by random grain distributions were confirmed in Supplementary Information. The values \(\varepsilon_{{{\text{eff}}}}^{\gamma }\) and \(\varepsilon_{{{\text{eff}}}}^{Z}\) perfectly agree with each other, which indicates that the composite can be treated as an effective medium. Additionally, theoretical BergmanMilton bounds^{32} are presented for comparison (green area). They indicate the range of possible real permittivities \(\varepsilon_{{{\text{eff}}}}^\prime\) and loss tangents \({\text{tan }} \delta_{{{\text{eff}}}}\) in a macroscopically isotropic composite with fixed values of \(\varepsilon_{{\text{m}}}^\prime\), \({\text{tan }} \delta_{{\text{m}}}\), \(\varepsilon_{{\text{i}}}^\prime\), \({\text{tan }} \delta_{{\text{i}}}\), and \(f\).
The real measured permittivities are slightly greater than the simulated ones, indicating different properties of the samples not present in the model—probably a nonspherical shape of the inclusions or their agglomeration. In the case of real permittivities \(\varepsilon_{{{\text{eff}}}}^\prime\), the measured values are inside theoretical Bergman–Milton bounds for each fraction of inclusions. Therefore, a grain shape exists, which would guarantee an agreement between the experimental and simulated values of \(\varepsilon_{{{\text{eff}}}}^\prime\). The experimental loss tangents are greater than the simulated ones by almost an order of magnitude for any nonzero concentration of inclusions. As this result violates the BergmanMilton bounds, effective medium theory cannot explain the high increase of the measured loss tangent. One of the possible origins of the additional loss can be a scattering of microwaves on the grains and a power leakage perpendicularly to the wave propagation direction. This effect is not taken into account in the simulation model, as it considers an infinitely wide composite layer. On the other hand, such loss increase has also been reported in the case of the PE/SCT composite at 8 GHz and supposed to be due to interaction of the alternating electric field with phonons or extrinsic factors like defects, interfaces, shape and size of the grains, and micropores^{33}. A manifestation of increased loss has recently also been reported for polymer composites measured at terahertz frequencies and attributed to the impact of reduced crystallinity, the presence of free carriers, and improper sample pressing^{34}.
Effect of grain size, shape, and aggregation
Here, we perform a comprehensive study of the effect of grain shape, clustering, and dimensions of inclusions in the ceramics/polypropylene composite. We considered pseudorandom composites with different inclusion diameters \(d\) (maximal distance between two points)—in the range 20–100 µm—with the computational model and experimentally. Additionally, we considered different inclusion shapes in the simulation: balls (Fig. 1a), cubes (Fig. 1b), and tetrahedra (Fig. 1c), whose grain volumes \({V}_{\mathrm{i}}\) equal \(\pi /6 \cdot d^{3}\), \(\sqrt 3 /9 \cdot d^{3}\), and \(\sqrt 2 /12 \cdot d^{3}\), respectively. The proper unit cell side length was calculated in each case using Eq. (6) for the relevant inclusion volume \({V}_{\mathrm{i}}\), guaranteeing the desired volume fraction \(f\)—corresponding to wt = 29.6% in Eq. (1). In the case of the experiment, only the maximal grain diameter is controllable, while the actual shapes of the inclusions depend on the preparation method. The study was carried out at a frequency of 5 GHz. As presented in Fig. 3a,b, the computational results indicate that the grain diameter, regardless of the inclusion shape, has a negligible impact on the effective dielectric constant: the wavelength is sufficiently large compared to the grain dimensions. However, we observe significant fluctuations of the real part of the experimental permittivities, which have to be attributed to different effects.
The results presented in Fig. 3a,b indicate a slight dependence of the effective composite permittivity on the inclusion shape. The more irregular the grain (the smaller volume for a given diameter d), the more edges and corners the electromagnetic field localizes on^{14,25}, and the greater the real permittivity. We also considered an effect of grain aggregation in the case of the spherical inclusions—by forcing the inclusions to form fourelement, tetrahedronshaped clusters. The real permittivity increase obtained for the ball aggregates is similar to that obtained with cubic grains, which is an effect of electromagnetic field localization in clusters' edges and corners. However, the observed changes are much below the fluctuations of the experimental results. The fluctuations are still inside the BergmanMilton bounds.
To further study the range of the possible effective composite permittivities, we considered ellipsoidal inclusions with different aspect ratios (ratios of their semiaxes). The ground of the analysis is the generalized Maxwell–Garnett formula (reported by Bohren and Battan) for randomly oriented inclusions^{35,36}:
where \({N}_{j}\) stands for the depolarization factor:
and \({a}_{x}\), \({a}_{y}\), \({a}_{z}\) are the ellipsoid’s semiaxes. The inclusion dimensions do not appear in the formulas. Although the model (Eq. 7) does not take into account interaction between the inclusions, the results in Fig. 3c,d indicate that ellipsoidal grains with aspect ratio much above 1 (oblate) or much below 1 (prolate) involve a significant increase of the real effective permittivity—the increase can be much greater than due to clustering or the presence of edges. This suggests that the reason for the high fluctuations observed in the experiment might be the aspect ratio randomness of the sieved grains—even if their maximal diameter (doubled semimajor axis of the ellipsoid) is fixed.
TiO_{2}/polypropylene composite
Figure 4 presents the measured results of the complex dielectric function \(\varepsilon_{{{\text{eff}}}} = \varepsilon_{{{\text{eff}}}}^\prime  j\varepsilon_{{{\text{eff}}}}^{\prime\prime}\) of the TiO_{2}/polypropylene composite at 5 GHz and 10 GHz frequencies. We recorded an increasing correlation for \(\varepsilon_{{{\text{eff}}}}^\prime\) and \({\text{tan }} \delta_{{{\text{eff}}}}\) as a function of containing TiO_{2} in polymer matrix. However, we observed no noticeable difference between the datasets for different frequencies, suggesting that the effect of permittivity dispersion in this microwave range is negligible. Moreover, as the loss tangent does not change between frequencies 5 GHz and 10 GHz, the source of the microwave loss is probably not Joule heating (as the imaginary part of the dielectric constant \(\varepsilon^{\prime\prime}\) related to electrical conductivity is proportional to \(\sigma /f\)). Therefore, the most probable reason for the observed microwave loss in TiO_{2}based composites is the interaction between electric field and phonons^{31}. The physical origin of the observed increasing composite’s real permittivity \(\varepsilon_{{{\text{eff}}}}^\prime\) is similar to ceramics/polypropylene composite and involves the polarization mechanism.
In order to validate the experimental results using theoretical studies, it is necessary to know the dielectric function of the TiO_{2} nanograins with anatase structure in the gigahertz frequency range. However, the choice of the dielectric function of TiO_{2} nanograins is ambiguous. The reported experimental values are \(\varepsilon_{{{\text{TiO}}2}}^\prime\) = 6.525 and \({\text{tan }} \delta_{{{\text{TiO}}2}}\) = 0.0218 for TiO_{2} in pellet form (with possible air traps) at 2.45 GHz with a particle size of 369 nm^{37}. In the frequency range from 1 to 18 GHz for nanocrystals with a diameter of 15 nm, the values of \(\varepsilon_{{{\text{TiO}}2}}^\prime\) = 6.1–6.5 and \({\text{tan }} \delta_{{{\text{TiO}}2}}\) ≤ 0.05 are reported^{38}. However, the possible values of the effective dielectric constant of the composite, as limited by the theoretical Bergman–Milton bounds^{32} applied for the former reported TiO_{2} dielectric function (pink area), are clearly below the measurement results for both \(\varepsilon_{{{\text{eff}}}}^\prime\) and \({\text{tan }} \delta_{{{\text{eff}}}}\), indicating the underestimated real permittivity \(\varepsilon_{{{\text{TiO}}2}}^\prime\) of the TiO_{2} nanograins. Interestingly, the theoretically allowed values of \(\varepsilon_{{{\text{eff}}}}\) agree well with the experimental data for \(\varepsilon_{{{\text{TiO}}2}}^\prime\) increased to about 20 (green area), with the same value of \({\text{tan }} \delta_{{{\text{TiO}}2}}\). While the reported values of \(\varepsilon_{{{\text{TiO}}2}}^\prime\) for TiO_{2} anatase nanograins, as measured in the gigahertz regime, are clearly underestimated, there exist reliable presumptions to consider a greater effective \(\varepsilon_{{{\text{TiO}}2}}^\prime\) for the TiO_{2} nanograins in the composite. Firstly, although the permittivity \(\varepsilon_{{{\text{TiO}}2}}^\prime \sim\) 6 agrees well with the reported bulk electronic permittivities \({\varepsilon }_{\mathrm{TiO}2}^{\infty }\) of anatase TiO_{2}, as obtained with both measurements^{39,40} and firstprinciples simulations^{41,42}, this value is applicable above the phonon frequencies. In contrast, the static value \({\varepsilon }_{\mathrm{TiO}2}^{0}\) is more appropriate below this regime. The reported values of \({\varepsilon }_{\mathrm{TiO}2}^{0}\) are anisotropic, and of the order of 45 and 23 for polarizations perpendicular and parallel to the c axis, respectively^{39,42}. Although the permittivity tends to decrease significantly for submicron thick films^{43,44,45}, the mechanism of the polarizability reduction might be complex and result in different behavior for nanograins in the composite. Moreover, an increase of \(\varepsilon_{{{\text{TiO}}2}}^\prime\) in TiO_{2} anatase nanograins upon hydrogenation by about 100% was reported^{38}—a similar effect might be present in nanograins surrounded by polypropylene. Further study is needed to provide the dielectric function of TiO_{2} filler appropriate for modeling the composites—potentially affected by the nanometer grains’ dimensions and the presence of the polypropylene matrix.
Similar to the studies presented for ceramics/polypropylene composites, we simulated the effects of grain size, shape, and aggregation on dielectric properties of TiO_{2}/polypropylene composites, using the isotropic dielectric parameters of all TiO_{2} nanocrystals equal \(\varepsilon_{{{\text{TiO}}2}}^\prime\) = 20 and \({\text{tan }} \delta_{{{\text{TiO}}2}}\) = 0.0218 (see the above discussion). The calculated results, as presented in Supplementary Information, indicate no noticeable impact of the grain size on the effective dielectric constant of the composites. We also showed that both real permittivity and loss tangent are affected by the shape and clustering of the inclusions—the more irregular the grain shape, the greater the dielectric parameters.
Conclusions
We performed a comprehensive study of real permittivity \(\varepsilon_{{{\text{eff}}}}^\prime\) and loss tangent \({\text{tan }} \delta_{{{\text{eff}}}}\) of two representative lowloss composites based on polypropylene (PP) and highdielectricconstant filler microparticles—microceramics and titanium oxide (TiO_{2})—with various concentrations, at GHz frequency. An increasing correlation for \(\varepsilon_{{{\text{eff}}}}^\prime\) as a function of the filler fraction was observed for both types of fillers. For the maximal considered grain concentrations, this enabled to obtain the real permittivities of 4.2 and 3.4 in ceramics/PP and TiO_{2}/PP composites, respectively. In the case of ceramicsPP composite, we confirmed theoretically that the presence of fillers impacts the effective propagation constant and characteristic impedance of the composite, both of which can be described in terms of the same value of the effective dielectric constant in the gigahertz regime. Additionally, we calculated that the real permittivity is significantly affected by the aspect ratio of ellipsoidshaped inclusions, while the impacts of grain aggregation, presence of edges, and size are much less significant.
In the case of loss tangent, we observed different behaviors for the two types of fillers. Loss tangent in TiO_{2}/PP composite increases with nanograins concentration which is clearly the effect of microwave loss of the filler. Contrary, loss tangent in ceramics/PP composite has an increasing tendency below the filler volume fraction of 5% and remains constant and equal to about 10^{–3} above this fraction. We attributed the intriguing observation to scattering of microwaves on the grains and a power leakage perpendicularly to the wave propagation direction in the composite. The increased loss can also result from an evolved microstructure of the fillers and/or matrix in the composite and interface effects.
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Code availability
All noncommercial numerical codes to reproduce the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Feng, Y. et al. Effect of nanoTiO2 on the polarization process of polyimide/TiO2 composites. Mater. Lett. 96, 113–116 (2013).
Ouyang, G., Wang, K. & Chen, X. Y. TiO2 nanoparticles modified polydimethylsiloxane with fast response time and increased dielectric constant. J. Micromech. Microeng. 22, 074002 (2012).
Gan, W. C. & Majid, W. H. A. Effect of nanoTiO2 on enhanced pyroelectric activity of PVDF composite. Smart Mater. Struct. 23, 045026 (2014).
Chiang, C. K. & Popielarz, R. Polymer composites with high dielectric constant. Ferroelectrics 275, 1–9 (2002).
Hu, G. et al. Preparation and dielectric properties of poly(vinylidene fluoride)/Ba0.6Sr0.4TiO3 composites. J. Alloys Compounds 619, 686–692 (2015).
Zhang, X. et al. Ultrahigh energy density of polymer nanocomposites containing BaTiO3@TiO2 nanofibers by atomicscale interface engineering. Adv. Mater. 27, 819–824 (2014).
Brosseau, C. Modelling and simulation of dielectric heterostructures: A physical survey from an historical perspective. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 39, 1277–1294 (2006).
Choy, T. C. Effective Medium Theory: Principles and Applications. (Oxford University Press, 2015).
Garnett, J. C. M. & Larmor, J. Colours in metal glasses and in metallic films. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical or Physical Character 203, 385–420 (1904).
Markel, V. A. Introduction to the Maxwell Garnett approximation: tutorial. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, JOSAA 33, 1244–1256 (2016).
Yao, H.Y., Lin, Y.W. & Chang, T.H. Dielectric properties of BaTiO3–epoxy nanocomposites in the microwave regime. Polymers 13, 1391 (2021).
Cheng, Y. et al. Modeling and simulation for effective permittivity of twophase disordered composites. J. Appl. Phys. 103, 034111 (2008).
Wu, D., Chen, J. & Liu, C. Numerical evaluation of effective dielectric properties of threedimensional composite materials with arbitrary inclusions using a finitedifference timedomain method. J. Appl. Phys. 102, 024107 (2007).
Pickles, A. J., Kilgore, I. M. & Steer, M. B. Electromagnetic properties of disordered threedimensional mixtures. IEEE Access 1, 778–788 (2013).
Sareni, B., Krähenbühl, L., Beroual, A. & Brosseau, C. Effective dielectric constant of random composite materials. J. Appl. Phys. 81, 2375–2383 (1997).
Jylha, L. & Sihvola, A. H. Numerical modeling of disordered mixture using pseudorandom simulations. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 43, 59–64 (2005).
Qasim, S. A. & Gupta, N. Computation of effective properties of graded and layered dielectrics. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 28, 460–467 (2021).
Wu, W. M. et al. Studies of permittivity and permeability of dielectric matrix with cuboid metallic inclusions in different orientations. J. Adv. Dielect. 04, 1450032 (2014).
Choroszucho, A., Butrylo, B., Steckiewicz, A. & Stankiewicz, J. M. Determination of the effective electromagnetic parameters of complex building materials for numerical analysis of wireless transmission networks. Electronics 9, 1569 (2020).
Polder, D. & van Santeen, J. H. The effective permeability of mixtures of solids. Physica 12, 257–271 (1946).
ShuAng, Z. A material multipole theory of elastic dielectric composites. Int. J. Solids Struct. 28, 423–447 (1991).
Sareni, B., Krähenbühl, L., Beroual, A. & Brosseau, C. Effective dielectric constant of periodic composite materials. J. Appl. Phys. 80, 1688–1696 (1996).
Mejdoubi, A. & Brosseau, C. Finiteelement simulation of the depolarization factor of arbitrarily shaped inclusions. Phys. Rev. E 74, 031405 (2006).
Cheng, H. & Torquato, S. Electricfield fluctuations in random dielectric composites. Phys. Rev. B 56, 8060–8068 (1997).
Pickles, A. J. & Steer, M. B. Effective permittivity of 3D periodic composites with regular and irregular inclusions. IEEE Access 1, 523–536 (2013).
Lian, H., Qin, J. & Freed, K. F. Dielectric virial expansion of polarizable dipolar spheres. J. Chem. Phys. 149, 163332 (2018).
Krupka, J. et al. Uncertainty of complex permittivity measurements by splitpost dielectric resonator technique. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 21, 2673–2676 (2001).
Xia, X., Wang, Y., Zhong, Z. & Weng, G. J. A theory of electrical conductivity, dielectric constant, and electromagnetic interference shielding for lightweight graphene composite foams. J. Appl. Phys. 120, 085102 (2016).
COMSOL 5.4. (COMSOL AB, 2018).
Chen, X., Cheng, Y., Wu, K. & Wu, S. Interfacial polarization and its influence on effective complex permittivity of mixtures. in 2008 International Symposium on Electrical Insulating Materials (ISEIM 2008) 238–241 (2008).
Gurevich, V. L. & Tagantsev, A. K. Intrinsic dielectric loss in crystals. Adv. Phys. 40, 719–767 (1991).
Milton, G. W. Bounds on the complex permittivity of a twocomponent composite material. J. Appl. Phys. 52, 5286–5293 (1981).
Subodh, G., Deepu, V., Mohanan, P. & Sebastian, M. T. Dielectric response of high permittivity polymer ceramic composite with low loss tangent. Appl. Phys. Lett. 95, 062903 (2009).
Bergen, M. H., Mitchell, M. E., Mellors, E. M. & Holzman, J. F. Manifestations of loss in terahertz polymer composites. Opt. Mater. Express 11, 3469–3477 (2021).
Bohren, C. F. & Battan, L. J. Radar backscattering of microwaves by spongy ice spheres. J. Atmos. Sci. 39, 2623–2628 (1982).
Sihvola, A. Mixing rules with complex dielectric coefficients. Subsurf. Sens. Technol. Appl. 1, 393–415 (2000).
Horikoshi, S. et al. Microwavespecific effects in various TiO2 specimens. Dielectric properties and degradation of 4chlorophenol. J. Phys. Chem. C 113, 5649–5657 (2009).
Xia, T., Zhang, C., Oyler, N. A. & Chen, X. Enhancing microwave absorption of TiO2 nanocrystals via hydrogenation. J. Mater. Res. 29, 2198–2210 (2014).
Gonzalez, R. J., Zallen, R. & Berger, H. Infrared reflectivity and lattice fundamentals in anatase TiO2. Phys. Rev. B 55, 7014–7017 (1997).
Wemple, S. H. Optical oscillator strengths and excitation energies in solids, liquids, and molecules. J. Chem. Phys. 67, 2151–2168 (1977).
Asahi, R., Taga, Y., Mannstadt, W. & Freeman, A. J. Electronic and optical properties of anatase TiO2. Phys. Rev. B 61, 7459–7465 (2000).
Mikami, M., Nakamura, S., Kitao, O. & Arakawa, H. Lattice dynamics and dielectric properties of TiO2 anatase: A firstprinciples study. Phys. Rev. B 66, 155213 (2002).
Takeuchi, M., Itoh, T. & Nagasaka, H. Dielectric properties of sputtered TiO2 films. Thin Solid Films 51, 83–88 (1978).
Rausch, N. & Burte, E. P. Thin TiO2 films prepared by low pressure chemical vapor deposition. J. Electrochem. Soc. 140, 145 (1993).
Zhou, L., Hoffmann, R. C., Zhao, Z., Bill, J. & Aldinger, F. Chemical bath deposition of thin TiO2anatase films for dielectric applications. Thin Solid Films 516, 7661–7666 (2008).
Acknowledgements
This work has received financial support from the following projects: POIR.04.04.00003C25/16, POIR.04.04.00001DC3/16, and POIR.04.04.00001C4B/16, all carried out within the TEAMTECH programme operated by the Foundation for Polish Science cofinanced by the European Union under the European Regional Development Fund, Smart Growth Operational Programme 2014–2020.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
K.W. and A.W. conceived and designed the study, analyzed the data, and wrote the main manuscript text. K.W. derived the simulation method, performed the calculations, and prepared figures. A.W. prepared the samples. A.D. and J.K. performed the measurements. M.M. and M.Z. supervised the study and revised the manuscript text. All authors have approved the final version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Wilczyński, K., Wróblewska, A., Daniszewska, A. et al. Modulation of dielectric properties in lowloss polypropylenebased composites at GHz frequencies: theory and experiment. Sci Rep 12, 13104 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598022171734
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598022171734
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.