Native predators are increasingly exposed to habitat loss and fragmentation globally. When developing conservation and management strategies, it is important to determine whether fragmented landscapes can still support similar predator densities to intact areas, and thereby constitute important habitat for these species. The spotted-tailed quoll (Dasyurus maculatus) is an endangered Australian mesopredator that is often considered to be forest-dependent. While quolls are known to occur in some fragmented forest landscapes, it is unclear whether these areas represent sub-optimal habitat where quolls merely persist, or whether quolls can still occur at densities similar to those observed in intact forest landscapes. We used camera traps to detect quolls in both a fragmented and intact forested site, over three years. We used each quoll’s unique pelage pattern to identify individual quolls and estimate population density at each site. We were able to assign more than 94% of quoll image sequences across both sites to identify 173 individuals during the study. Density estimates of 0.13–0.66 quolls per km2 at the fragmented site were comparable to estimates of 0.28–0.48 quolls per km2 at the intact site. Our results highlight the importance of retaining and protecting forest fragments for the conservation of endangered quoll populations.
Habitat loss and fragmentation are the main causes of biodiversity decline around the world, as humans continue to modify and clear natural habitats1,2,3. Native predators are increasingly threatened by habitat fragmentation4,5 and associated impacts of reduced habitat resources and increased conflict with other predators and humans6,7,8. For example, in Madagascar, small native predators such as spotted fanaloka (Fossa fossana) and ring-tailed vontsira (Galidia elegans) have suffered range contractions due to habitat loss, hunting by humans, and competition with introduced predators8,9. However, some native mesopredators are known to persist and even thrive in fragmented landscapes4,10. For example, pine martens (Martes martes) occur in fragmented landscapes in Europe, utilising supplementary prey and habitat resources11,12. Similarly, güiña (Leopardus guigna) occupy forest fragments and edge habitats in fragmented landscapes in Chile13,14. As native predators continue to be impacted by habitat loss, a key challenge is understanding their ecology in fragmented landscapes to inform conservation and management of these species.
The spotted-tailed quoll (Dasyurus maculatus) is a medium-sized (males 2.0–4.2 kg; females 1.2–2.1 kg15) endangered mesopredator endemic to Australia. Since European colonization, the spotted-tailed quoll (hereafter referred to as ‘quoll’) has suffered a 50–90% decline in its range16, primarily due to habitat loss and associated increase in competitive interactions with introduced predators such as red foxes (Vulpes vulpes)17,18. On mainland Australia, quolls have predominately been studied in large, intact, forested landscapes19,20,21. They are considered a forest-dependent species18,22, presumably because forested habitats are thought to provide quolls with refugia from foxes that are typically more prevalent in fragmented and open agricultural landscapes. However, previous research suggests that quolls can persist in fragmented habitats on mainland Australia23 as well as in the island state of Tasmania 24,25,26. While foxes are absent from Tasmania, they are widespread across most of mainland Australia, where quoll ecology in fragmented landscapes is poorly understood. To inform meaningful conservation strategies, it is important to understand to what degree quoll populations persist in fragmented landscapes.
When developing conservation and management strategies for animal populations, an estimate of a species population size if often required27. For species with distinct markings, such as the quoll, spatial capture-recapture (SCR) models can be used to estimate population density. SCR models are an extension of conventional capture-recapture models that incorporate the spatial distribution and movements of known individuals relative to capture locations28. SCR models allow for more flexible study designs as they eliminate the need for estimating the area effectively sampled28, which is useful when attempting to estimate density of rare or cryptic carnivore species that occur across large areas29. For example, SCR has been used to estimate densities of tigers (Panthera tigris) and leopards (Panthera pardus) in India30, as well as brown hyenas (Parahyaena brunnea) and spotted hyenas (Crocuta crocuta) in Botswana31.
In this study, we investigated whether quolls in a fragmented forested site on mainland Australia persisted at relatively low densities, or whether they persisted at similar densities to populations in a nearby intact forested site. We used camera traps to detect quolls over a three-year period and utilised their uniquely spotted pelage to identify individuals at each site. The detection and spatial re-detection of individual quolls was then used to estimate quoll density at each site using SCR models. We predicted that the fragmented site would support lower densities of quolls than the intact site, due to anticipated negative impacts from habitat fragmentation.
Camera trapping was conducted across two sites in the Hunter Region of New South Wales, Australia (Fig. 1). The first site was located in the Hunter Valley in a fragmented forest landscape not associated with any large, contiguous forest. The site comprised remnant sclerophyll forest, grassy woodland, and small pockets of dry rainforest intermixed with open areas cleared for mining and agriculture. Data for this site came from three different camera trap studies, each with different camera trap layouts and survey effort (Fig. 1a–c). The second site was located within Mt Royal National Park, which comprised an intact, contiguous forested landscape with a mix of sclerophyll forests and dry rainforest, located approximately 20 km north-east of the Hunter Valley site. Data for this site came from a single camera trap study (Fig. 1d).
At the Hunter Valley (‘Fragmented’) site, ‘Study 1’ was conducted from July 2018 to October 2019 and consisted of 25 randomly allocated camera trap locations (Fig. 1a) as described in Henderson et al.23. For ‘Study 2’, the 25 camera traps were condensed into a more focal study area (Fig. 1b) and surveys were conducted from October 2019 to May 2020, as described in Henderson, et al.32. For ‘Study 3’, an expanded study area was used which consisted of 42 camera trap locations (Fig. 1c; Henderson et al. (in prep)), with surveys conducted from May 2020 to December 2020. At the Mt Royal National Park (‘Intact’) site, 25 cameras traps were deployed continuously from August 2019 to August 2021 (Fig. 1d) as described in Henderson et al.32. For each study, camera traps were spaced at least 500 m from adjacent cameras, to approximate the minimum home range of female quolls19. Fine-scale camera trap locations were selected based on the presence of suitable habitat features such as fallen logs required for camera trap setup. Research at these sites were approved by the Animal Ethics Committee at the University of New England, Australia.
Reconyx HC600 infrared cameras (Reconyx, Holmen, USA) were used for all surveys. Each camera was positioned ~ 1.0 m above the ground and attached to a metal post which faced a large horizontal log located between 1.5 and 3.0 m in front of the camera. A vented lure canister containing ~ 500 g of raw chicken necks was pegged into the ground in front of the log. To increase the probability of quoll detections, cameras were positioned so that the camera’s upper detection zone covered the top of the log and the lower detection zone covered the lure canister23. All cameras were programmed to take a rapid-fire sequence of 10 images per motion trigger on high sensitivity with no delay between triggers. Camera traps were serviced every 2–4 months, which included replacement of batteries, SD cards and lures, as well as checking camera alignment and functionality. The large and inconsistent variation in time between camera servicing across surveys was due to logistical and environmental constraints throughout the study.
Individual quoll identification
To identify individual quolls, we assessed each quoll image sequence using the quoll’s unique spot patterns (Fig. 2). A catalogue of known individual quolls was progressively developed using a decision matrix flowchart (Supplementary Fig. S1). An individual quoll profile was defined as ‘complete’ if clear images of both the left and right lateral sides were obtained and did not match any previously profiled quolls. Individual quoll profiles were defined as ‘semi-complete’ if clear images of only one lateral side were obtained (either left or right; Fig. 2a–c) and did not match any previously profiled quolls (from either complete or semi-complete quoll profiles). Sequences of quoll images with unclear lateral spot patterns were categorised as ‘non-identifiable’. This included images that were blurry, obstructed, or only showed a small part of the quoll such as the tail, head or legs (Fig. 2d). While all images (n = 10) in each image sequence were assessed, often only one clear image was required for successful identification. All images in that sequence were assigned the same identification tag, as well as any image sequences that immediately followed (i.e. < 1 s between successive image sequences). In addition to spot patterns, other features such as size, shape, sex, or markings such as bald spots, injuries, or other pelage variations also assisted with identification of individuals e.g. Gorta et al.33. Quoll images were reviewed and tagged using Exifpro34 and were subsequently sorted into individual folders for each camera site, survey period, and study. For quoll profiles that were semi-complete, we only included the profiles from one lateral side (left or right) in subsequent analyses. At the Fragmented site, quolls with left-side only profiles were more frequent and therefore included. At the Intact site, quolls with right-side only profiles were more frequent and therefore included.
Quoll detection events
For all profiled quolls, consecutive detections on the same camera were considered independent detection events if image sequences were separated by more than 10 min23. To standardise survey length across datasets, we first separated each study into distinct survey periods, with each new survey period commencing from the date when camera traps were serviced and lures refreshed. This was to ensure that the potential effect of lure age on quoll detectability remained consistent across survey periods32. This resulted in 12 surveys across the three studies at the Fragmented site, and seven surveys at the Intact site. As survey periods varied in duration, we adopted a standardised survey duration by truncating each survey back to the first 42 nights to match the duration of the shortest survey. We then calculated cumulative quoll detections and individual quolls for each night, for each survey period. Cumulative detections and individuals were then converted into a percentage of the total of number of detections and individuals for that survey. The mean proportion of cumulative detections and individual quolls for each night was calculated for each site. To help visualise quoll detections at each camera location for each study, we calculated the number of independent quoll detections per 100 camera trap nights.
Estimated quoll density
To estimate quoll density for each survey period at each site, we used the ‘secr’ package version 4.5.335 in R version 4.2.036. For SCR models, three data inputs are needed: (1) the total number of identifiable individuals encountered in each survey period; (2) the total number of re-encounters (to provide information on the baseline encounter rate); and (3) spatial re-encounters (to provide information on the movement parameter)37. SCR uses spatial detection histories to model the movement and distribution of individuals in space relative to the camera trap array38. We created spatial detection histories of individual quolls for each survey period using the R package ‘camtrapR’ version 2.0.339. Each survey ran for 42 consecutive nightly occasions, with each occasion lasting 24 h (from 12:00:00 to 11:59:59 the following day). For all SCR models, we used the default ‘half-normal’ detection function37 with a buffer width of 4σ as recommended by Efford35. Each model included three parameters: D, animal density; g0, baseline encounter probability (probability of capture when the animals home range is centred on the camera); and σ, the spatial detection parameter. We investigated time and behavioural effects on the baseline encounter probability g0, where D and σ were kept constant (Table 1). These models tested several hypotheses: that the encounter probability changes based on quoll behaviour (1) after being detected (learned response), (2) after being detected at a specific site (site-specific response), or (3) linearly with time. We then ranked each model using Akaike Information Criterion values adjusted for small sample sizes (AICc)40 to determine model parsimony.
Individual quoll identification
At both sites, over 94% of quoll image sequences were successfully assigned to a complete quoll profile (Table 2). Very few image sequences (≤ 1.3%) were assigned to semi-complete quoll profiles of only one lateral side (Table 2). Image sequences which could not be assigned to a profiled quoll (either complete or semi-complete) ranged from 3.1 to 5.0% across studies (Table 2).
At the Fragmented site, 88 individual quolls were detected and identified across the three study periods, of which, 80% were detected on at least a second independent occasion (Supplementary Fig. S2). At the Intact site, there were 85 individual quolls detected, of which, 78% were detected on a second independent occasion (Supplementary Fig. S3).
Quoll detection events
At both sites, cumulative quoll detections increased almost linearly with time across all 42-night survey periods (Fig. 3). On average, 90% of individual quolls were detected within 27 nights at the Fragmented site (Fig. 3a) and within 28 nights at the Intact site (Fig. 3b). This indicates that while most individual quoll were detected within the first ~ 4 weeks, quoll detections (of mostly the same individuals) continued at a consistent rate throughout the survey duration. At the Fragmented site, quolls were detected at almost all camera locations (Fig. 4a–c). At the Intact site, quolls were detected at all camera locations (Fig. 4d).
Estimated quoll density
For each survey period, model comparison revealed substantial support for the top-ranked model (ΔAICc > 2) when compared to all other competing models (Supplementary Table S1 and S2). The ‘site-specific learned response’ model (bk) was the most frequently supported model at both the Fragmented site (7 out of 12 surveys; Table 3) and Intact site (4 out of 7 surveys; Table 4). There was typically support for the ‘bk’ model in surveys with high quoll detections, indicating that individual quolls tended to be re-detected at the same camera trap site.
At the Fragmented site, estimated quoll density varied across survey periods, ranging from 0.13 (95% CI: 0.08–0.22) to 0.66 (95% CI: 0.32–1.36) quolls per km2, with an average of 0.32 ± 0.04 (s.e.) quolls per km2 (Table 3). Density at the Intact site was similar to the Fragmented site but was more consistent across survey periods, ranging from 0.28 (95% CI: 0.17–0.45) to 0.48 (95% CI: 0.27–0.86) quolls per km2, with a slightly higher average of 0.39 ± 0.03 (s.e.) quolls per km2 (Table 4). Estimated quoll densities appeared to increase during the Nov-Dec surveys at the Fragmented site (Table 3), and during surveys between Jan-Mar at the intact site (Table 4), although these estimates had large confidence intervals, low detections, and fewer quolls with spatial re-detections. In surveys where detections and the number of quolls with spatial re-detections were higher, density estimates were generally lower but were typically more precise (narrower confidence intervals; Tables 3 and 4). This was particularly evident during Study 3 at the Fragmented site, where estimated quoll density during the Nov-Dec 2020 survey was substantially higher, but with much lower precision and fewer detections when compared to the May-Jun 2020 and Aug-Sep 2020 surveys (Table 3).
This study is the first to compare quoll densities between fragmented and intact forested landscapes. Using SCR models, we determined that quoll density estimates were comparable between the two sites, suggesting that fragmented habitats have the capacity to support quoll populations densities equal to intact landscapes. This highlights the importance of retaining and protecting forest fragments for the conservation of endangered quolls in Australia.
There are several possible explanations for the observed similarity in quoll densities across the fragmented and intact habitats. First, the apparent low density of foxes at our fragmented site23 might have allowed quolls to reach densities similar to those attainable in fox-free or intact forested habitats. Indeed, our estimated densities of 0.13–0.66 quolls per km2 at the fragmented site were similar to densities of 0.20–0.70 quolls per km2 observed by Hamer et al.41 in a fox-free fragmented agricultural landscape in Tasmania. On mainland Australia, quolls are considered vulnerable to negative interactions from foxes42,43, with exploitation and interference competition likely increased in fragmented landscapes44,45. However, this risk would be minimised at sites with few or no foxes. Fox detections at our intact site were low, with only three detections from 17,690 camera trap nights. Density estimates of 0.28–0.66 quolls per km2 at this site were similar to observed estimates of 0.10–0.50 quolls per km2 in an intact, forested landscape in north-eastern New South Wales, where foxes were rare46. Therefore, quolls may be able to equally occur in fragmented and intact forested habitats if fox density is below a certain threshold. Future research should investigate whether quoll densities decline across sites supporting a gradient of increasing fox densities.
Second, fragmented landscapes may provide sufficient habitat and prey resources to support quoll densities similar to intact forested landscapes. For example, forest fragments provide suitable den sites and refugia from other predators for long-tailed weasels (Mustela frenata) in agricultural landscapes in America. Likewise, leopard cats (Prionailurus bengalensis) exploit abundant rodent pests in landscapes fragmented by oil palm plantations in South-East Asia47,48,49. On mainland Australia, quolls are generally associated with contiguous forest comprising an abundance of hollow-bearing trees, logs, and burrows, which provide suitable den sites and support high prey densities19,50,51. Similarly, the fragmented site has an abundance of large boulders and rocky outcrops which also offer suitable den sites for quolls20,50, and may also support high densities of supplemental prey species such as invasive European hares (Lepus europaeus) and rodents, which were frequently detected on the cameras. It is possible that the fragmented site provides sufficient resources that encompass typical quoll home range size and can therefore sustain quoll densities similar to the intact site. However, there is likely a threshold level of habitat fragmentation for which quolls can tolerate before resources become insufficient and densities decline. Further research should therefore investigate quoll densities along a gradient of increasingly fragmented landscapes, to better understand how different levels of habitat fragmentation impact quoll density.
Third, the quoll population in the fragmented site might represent a ‘sink’ population, with the nearby, higher quality intact site representing a ‘source’ population which supplements quoll losses at the lower quality fragmented site. In fragmented landscapes, sink populations can persist in habitat fragments and exist within a larger metapopulation52. For quoll populations in these habitat fragments, mortality may exceed reproduction, and therefore rely on immigrants from populations in good quality source habitats where reproduction exceeds mortality53. Live-trapping data conducted during our study suggests that the fragmented site’s population was comprised mostly of younger quolls, compared to the intact site. It is possible that while the fragmented site can support similar quoll densities, it serves as a sink population where quolls die young and are rapidly replaced by immigrants from nearby populations. Therefore, the replacement of quolls from source populations could be masking negative impacts of habitat fragmentation on the population size. Future research should investigate whether quolls in the fragmented site are genetically similar to quolls in the nearby intact forested site, to determine if these populations are isolated or constitute a metapopulation.
Although density estimates were similar between the two sites, there were some inconsistencies between survey periods within each site including estimates with varying degrees of precision. Surveys that yielded a higher number of detections and spatial re-detections generally resulted in lower but more precise density estimates. For both sites, quoll detections were highest for surveys undertaken between May and August, and were often associated with narrower confidence intervals than other surveys. These survey periods coincided with the quolls’ annual breeding and immediate post-breeding periods15. During these times, quolls are most active due to the immigration of transient males from surrounding areas46, thereby increasing the likelihood of detection at the study site. This was also reflected in a higher number of individual quolls and detections, though surveys during this period generally yielded lower density estimates. In contrast, density estimates were generally higher during surveys undertaken between October and February which coincides with when juveniles typically emerge from their natal dens and disperse46,54. However, these estimates were associated with large confidence intervals and fewer quoll detections and spatial re-detections. Similar results were found in Schmidt, et al.55 where overly high density estimates of black bears (Ursus americanus) were associated with fewer individuals and relatively low spatial re-captures, suggesting inflation of density estimates. Spatial re-detections are particularly important for reducing inflated estimates, and surveys which detected fewer individuals with spatial re-detections may result in less precise density estimates.
Our study highlights some of the potential challenges in obtaining reliable density estimates for carnivores, even when reliable individual identification is achievable. SCR models offer an advantage over conventional capture-recapture methods by eliminating the need to estimate the size of the sample area, but instead requires sufficient spatial re-detections of individuals28. White56 recommends a minimum of 20 individuals to obtain precise population estimates for conventional capture-recapture models. However, this is not always achievable especially when attempting to survey low density, wide ranging carnivores57. Therefore, SCR surveys need to maximise the spatial re-detectability of individuals58. This might be achieved by deploying more cameras across a wider area59, increasing survey duration, or surveying during the time of the year when the animal is most active60,61. Conversely, consideration also needs to be given to the requirement for population closure62. In our study for instance, transient male quolls and independent juveniles may be entering or leaving the population during various times of the year. Therefore, a compromise is needed between survey length being long enough to obtain sufficient data, but also short enough so that the assumption of closure is less likely to be violated due to transient individuals37.
Understanding population density in different landscapes is critical for developing conservation and management strategies for mesopredator species. While quoll research has predominately been conducted in intact contiguous forest, our results suggest that quolls can equally persist at similar densities in fragmented habitats, highlighting the importance of forest fragments for quoll conservation. The importance of forest fragments in supporting mesopredator populations has similarly been documented for pine martens63, leopard cats64 and güiña14. Although quolls can persist and potentially thrive in fragmented Australian landscapes, further research is needed to determine associated limiting factors such as prey availability, habitat resources and genetic connectivity to proximal contiguous forests, to better inform appropriate conservation and management of this endangered species.
The data used in this paper are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Hanski, I. Habitat fragmentation and species richness. J. Biogeogr. 42, 989–993. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.12478 (2015).
Hoffmann, M. et al. The impact of conservation on the status of the world’s vertebrates. Science 330, 1503–1509. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1194442 (2010).
Pimm, S. L. et al. The biodiversity of species and their rates of extinction, distribution, and protection. Science 344, 1246752 (2014).
Crooks, K. R. Relative sensitivities of mammalian carnivores to habitat fragmentation. Conserv. Biol. 16, 488–502. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.00386.x (2002).
Elliot, N. B., Cushman, S. A., Macdonald, D. W. & Loveridge, A. J. The devil is in the dispersers: Predictions of landscape connectivity change with demography. J. Appl. Ecol. 51, 1169–1178. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12282 (2014).
Carroll, C. Interacting effects of climate change, landscape conversion, and harvest on carnivore populations at the range margin: Marten and lynx in the northern Appalachians. Conserv. Biol. 21, 1092–1104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00719.x (2007).
Ripple, W. J. et al. Status and ecological effects of the world’s largest carnivores. Science 343, 1241484. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1241484 (2014).
Farris, Z. J. et al. Hunting, exotic carnivores, and habitat loss: Anthropogenic effects on a native carnivore community, Madagascar. PLOS ONE 10, e0136456. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136456 (2015).
Farris, Z. J. et al. Threats to a rainforest carnivore community: A multi-year assessment of occupancy and co-occurrence in Madagascar. Biol. Cons. 210, 116–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2017.04.010 (2017).
Swihart, R. K., Gehring, T. M., Kolozsvary, M. B. & Nupp, T. E. Responses of “resistant” vertebrates to habitat loss and fragmentation: The importance of niche breadth and range boundaries. Divers. Distrib. 9, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1472-4642.2003.00158.x (2003).
Caryl, F. M., Quine, C. P. & Park, K. J. Martens in the matrix: The importance of nonforested habitats for forest carnivores in fragmented landscapes. J. Mammal. 93, 464–474. https://doi.org/10.1644/11-MAMM-A-149.1 (2012).
Pereboom, V. et al. Movement patterns, habitat selection, and corridor use of a typical woodland-dweller species, the European pine marten (Martes martes), in fragmented landscape. Can. J. Zool. 86, 983–991. https://doi.org/10.1139/Z08-076 (2008).
Fleschutz, M. M. et al. Response of a small felid of conservation concern to habitat fragmentation. Biodivers. Conserv. 25, 1447–1463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-016-1118-6 (2016).
Gálvez, N. et al. Forest cover outside protected areas plays an important role in the conservation of the Vulnerable guiña Leopardus guigna. Oryx 47, 251–258. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605312000099 (2013).
Belcher, C. A. Demographics of tiger quoll (Dasyurus maculatus maculatus) populations in south-eastern Australia. Aust. J. Zool. 51, 611–626. https://doi.org/10.1071/ZO02051 (2003).
Maxwell, S., Burbidge, A. & Morris, K. Spotted-tailed Quoll (SE mainland and Tas); recovery outline. (1996).
Jones, M. E., Rose, R. K. & Burnett, S. Dasyurus maculatus. Mammalian Species 676, 1–9 (2001).
Long, K. & Nelson, J. National recovery plan for the spotted-tailed Quoll Dasyurus maculatus. Victorian Department of Sustainability and Environment (2010).
Claridge, A. W. et al. Home range of the spotted-tailed quoll (Dasyurus maculatus), a marsupial carnivore, in a rainshadow woodland. Wildl. Res. 32, 7–14. https://doi.org/10.1071/WR04031 (2005).
Glen, A. S. & Dickman, C. R. Home range, denning behaviour and microhabitat use of the carnivorous marsupial Dasyurus maculatus in eastern Australia. J. Zool. 268, 347–354. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.2006.00064.x (2006).
Körtner, G. et al. Population structure, turnover and movement of spotted-tailed quolls on the New England Tablelands. Wildl. Res. 31, 475–484. https://doi.org/10.1071/WR03041 (2004).
Belcher, C. The Largest Surviving Marsupial Carnivore on Mainland Australia: The Tiger or Spotted-Tailed Quoll Dasyurus maculatus, A Nationally Threatened, Forest-Dependent Species 612–623 (Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales, Sydney, 2004).
Henderson, T., Fancourt, B. A., Rajaratnam, R., Vernes, K. & Ballard, G. Spatial and temporal interactions between endangered spotted-tailed quolls and introduced red foxes in a fragmented landscape. J. Zool. https://doi.org/10.1111/jzo.12919 (2021).
Troy, S. N. Spatial Ecology of the Tasmanian Spotted-Tailed Quoll. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Tasmania, (2014).
Jones, M. E. et al. Research supporting restoration aiming to make a fragmented landscape ‘functional’ for native wildlife. Ecol. Manag. Restor. 22, 65–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/emr.12504 (2021).
Andersen, G. E., Johnson, C. N., Barmuta, L. A. & Jones, M. E. Use of anthropogenic linear features by two medium-sized carnivores in reserved and agricultural landscapes. Scientific Reports 7, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-11454-z (2017).
Nichols, J. D. in Applied Ecology and Human Dimensions in Biological Conservation (eds L. M. Verdade, M.C. Lyra-Jorge, & C.I. Pina) 117–131 (Springer, 2014).
Royle, J. A., Chandler, R. B., Sollmann, R. & Gardner, B. in Spatial Capture-Recapture (eds J. Andrew Royle, Richard B. Chandler, Rahel Sollmann, & Beth Gardner) 3–19 (Academic Press, 2014).
Sollmann, R., Gardner, B. & Belant, J. L. How does spatial study design influence density estimates from spatial capture-recapture models?. PLoS ONE 7, e34575 (2012).
Kalle, R., Ramesh, T., Qureshi, Q. & Sankar, K. Density of tiger and leopard in a tropical deciduous forest of Mudumalai Tiger Reserve, southern India, as estimated using photographic capture–recapture sampling. Acta Theriol. 56, 335–342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13364-011-0038-9 (2011).
Vissia, S., Wadhwa, R. & van Langevelde, F. Co-occurrence of high densities of brown hyena and spotted hyena in central Tuli, Botswana. J. Zool. 314, 143–150. https://doi.org/10.1111/jzo.12873 (2021).
Henderson, T., Fancourt, B. A. & Ballard, G. The importance of species-specific survey designs: Prey camera trap surveys significantly underestimate the detectability of endangered spotted-tailed quolls. Aust. Mammalogy https://doi.org/10.1071/AM21039 (2022).
Gorta, S. B. Z., Alting, B., Claridge, A. & Henderson, T. Apparent piebald variants in quolls (Dasyurus): Examples of three recent cases in the spotted-tailed quoll Dasyurus maculatus. Aust. Mammalogy 43, 373–377. https://doi.org/10.1071/AM20058 (2021).
Kowalksi, M. (https://exifpro.informer.com/2.1/, 2011).
Efford, M. in R package version 4.5.3 (2022).
R Core Team. (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2022).
Rovero, F. & Zimmermann, F. Camera Trapping for Wildlife Research (Pelagic Publishing Ltd, London, 2016).
Efford, M. Density estimation in live-trapping studies. Oikos 106, 598–610. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.13043.x (2004).
Niedballa, J., Sollmann, R., Courtiol, A. & Wilting, A. camtrapR: An R package for efficient camera trap data management. Methods Ecol. Evol. 7, 1457–1462. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12600 (2016).
Burnham, K. P. & Anderson, D. R. A practical information-theoretic approach. Model Sel. Multimodel Inference 2, 70–71 (2002).
Hamer, R. P. et al. Differing effects of productivity on home-range size and population density of a native and an invasive mammalian carnivore. Wildlife Res. 49, 158–168. https://doi.org/10.1071/WR20134 (2021).
Glen, A. S. & Dickman, C. R. Complex interactions among mammalian carnivores in Australia, and their implications for wildlife management. Biol. Rev. 80, 387–401. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1464793105006718 (2005).
Glen, A. S., Pennay, M., Dickman, C. R., Wintle, B. A. & Firestone, K. B. Diets of sympatric native and introduced carnivores in the Barrington Tops, eastern Australia. Austral Ecol. 36, 290–296. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9993.2010.02149.x (2011).
Glen, A. S. & Dickman, C. R. Population viability analysis shows spotted-tailed quolls may be vulnerable to competition. Aust Mammalogy 35, 180–183. https://doi.org/10.1071/AM12045 (2013).
Graham, C. A., Maron, M. & McAlpine, C. A. Influence of landscape structure on invasive predators: Feral cats and red foxes in the brigalow landscapes, Queensland Australia. Wildl. Res. 39, 661–676. https://doi.org/10.1071/WR12008 (2012).
Glen, A. S. Population attributes of the spotted-tailed quoll (Dasyurus maculatus) in north-eastern New South Wales. Aust. J. Zool. 56, 137–142. https://doi.org/10.1071/ZO08025 (2008).
Chua, M. A., Sivasothi, N. & Meier, R. Population density, spatiotemporal use and diet of the leopard cat (Prionailurus bengalensis) in a human-modified succession forest landscape of Singapore. Mammal Res. 61, 99–108 (2016).
Lorica, M. & Heaney, L. Survival of a native mammalian carnivore, the leopard cat Prionailurus bengalensis Kerr, 1792 (Carnivora: Felidae), in an agricultural landscape on an oceanic Philippine island. J. Threatened Taxa, 4451–4460 (2013).
Rajaratnam, R., Sunquist, M., Rajaratnam, L. & Ambu, L. Diet and habitat selection of the leopard cat (Prionailurus bengalensis borneoensis) in an agricultural landscape in Sabah, Malaysian Borneo. J. Trop. Ecol. 23, 209–217 (2007).
Belcher, C. A. & Darrant, J. P. Den use by the spotted-tailed quoll Dasyurus maculatus in south-eastern Australia. Aust Mammalogy 28, 59–64. https://doi.org/10.1071/AM06007 (2006).
Glen, A. & Dickman, C. Why are there so many spotted-tailed Quolls Dasyurus maculatus in parts of north-eastern New South Wales?. Aust Zool 35, 711–718. https://doi.org/10.7882/az.2011.023 (2011).
Hanski, I. Metapopulation ecology (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1999).
Pulliam, H. R. Sources, sinks, and population regulation. Am. Nat. 132, 652–661 (1988).
Belcher, C. A. Susceptibility of the tiger quoll, Dasyurus maculatus, and the eastern quoll, D. viverrinus, to 1080-poisoned baits in control programmes for vertebrate pests in eastern Australia. Wildl. Res. 25, 33–40. https://doi.org/10.1071/WR95077 (1998).
Schmidt, G. M., Graves, T. A., Pederson, J. C. & Carroll, S. L. Precision and bias of spatial capture–recapture estimates: A multi-site, multi-year Utah black bear case study. Ecological Applications 32, e2618. https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.2618 (2022).
White, G. C. Capture-Recapture and Removal Methods for Sampling Closed Populations (Los Alamos National Laboratory, New Mexico, 1982).
Thornton, D. H. & Pekins, C. E. Spatially explicit capture–recapture analysis of bobcat (Lynx rufus) density: Implications for mesocarnivore monitoring. Wildl. Res. 42, 394–404. https://doi.org/10.1071/WR15092 (2015).
Sollmann, R. et al. Improving density estimates for elusive carnivores: Accounting for sex-specific detection and movements using spatial capture–recapture models for jaguars in central Brazil. Biol. Cons. 144, 1017–1024 (2011).
Green, A. M., Chynoweth, M. W. & Şekercioğlu, Ç. H. Spatially explicit capture-recapture through camera trapping: A review of benchmark analyses for wildlife density estimation. Front. Ecol. Evol. 8, 473. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2020.563477 (2020).
du Preez, B. D., Loveridge, A. J. & Macdonald, D. W. To bait or not to bait: a comparison of camera-trapping methods for estimating leopard Panthera pardus density. Biol. Cons. 176, 153–161 (2014).
Zimmermann, F., Breitenmoser-Würsten, C., Molinari-Jobin, A. & Breitenmoser, U. Optimizing the size of the area surveyed for monitoring a Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx) population in the Swiss Alps by means of photographic capture–recapture. Integr. Zool. 8, 232–243 (2013).
Dupont, P., Milleret, C., Gimenez, O. & Bischof, R. Population closure and the bias-precision trade-off in spatial capture–recapture. Methods Ecol. Evol. 10, 661–672. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13158 (2019).
Mergey, M., Helder, R. & Roeder, J. J. Effect of forest fragmentation on space-use patterns in the European pine marten (Martes martes). J. Mammal. 92, 328–335. https://doi.org/10.1644/09-MAMM-A-366.1 (2011).
Silmi, M. et al. Activity and ranging behavior of leopard cats (Prionailurus bengalensis) in an oil palm landscape. Frontiers in Environmental Science 9, 651939. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2021.651939 (2021).
We thank Joshua Van der Eyk, Heath Milne, Lisa Albino, Brent Klohk, Lara Fanning, Conor Nest and Aly Ross for their excellent fieldwork assistance. Funding for this research, and access to the Hunter Valley site, was provided by Liddell Coal Operations Pty Limited.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Henderson, T., Fancourt, B.A., Rajaratnam, R. et al. Density estimates reveal that fragmented landscapes provide important habitat for conserving an endangered mesopredator, the spotted-tailed quoll. Sci Rep 12, 12688 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-16982-x
This article is cited by
Mammal Research (2022)