Abstract
Electrical resistivity measurements of Fe–10wt%Ni–10wt%Si have been performed in a multi-anvil press from 3 to 20 GPa up to 2200 K. The temperature and pressure dependences of electrical resistivity are analyzed in term of changes in the electron mean free path. Similarities in the thermal properties of Fe–Si and Fe–Ni–Si alloys suggest the effect of Ni is negligible. Electrical resistivity is used to calculate thermal conductivity via the Wiedemann–Franz law, which is then used to estimate the adiabatic heat flow. The adiabatic heat flow at the top of Earth’s core is estimated to be 14 TW from the pressure and temperature dependences of thermal conductivity in the liquid state from this study, suggesting thermal convection may still be an active source to power the dynamo depending on the estimated value taken for the heat flow through the core mantle boundary. The calculated adiabatic heat flux density of 22.7–32.1 mW/m2 at the top of Mercury’s core suggests a chemically driven magnetic field from 0.02 to 0.21 Gyr after formation. A thermal conductivity of 140–148 Wm−1 K−1 is estimated at the center of a Fe–10wt%Ni–10wt%Si Venusian core, suggesting the presence of a solid inner core and an outer core that is at least partially liquid.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The magnetic field of Mercury, Earth, and other terrestrial-type bodies is thought to originate from an internal dynamo generated by convection in an electrically conductive metallic region of the planet1. A dynamo may be generated when sufficient thermally and/or chemically convective motion is combined with planetary rotation to provide sufficient kinetic energy to core fluid2. When the heat extracted from the core through the core-mantle boundary (CMB) exceeds the heat transferred along the core adiabat, the top part of the core becomes thermally convective. When the heat extracted from the core through the CMB is less than the adiabatic heat flow, the top part of the core is thermally conductive and thermal convection is negligible. In this case, compositional convection that arises from the crystallization of the inner core (IC) becomes the dominant source of convective power3.The onset of chemical convection therefore indicates the upper bound for age of IC formation. In the absence of a radiogenic heat source in the core, the onset of a chemically driven dynamo depends on the release of light elements at the IC boundary (ICB) as the IC solidifies, which is governed by the light element content.
Earth’s core composition
The composition of the metallic liquid outer core (OC) is relatively well constrained to be dominantly Fe and Ni with some light elements (e.g., O, C, S, Si and H)4,5. The presence of Ni is expected considering the composition of meteorites (5–10wt% Ni), while the presence of light elements is a suggested solution to the core’s density deficit4,5,6,7,8,9,10. Antonangeli et al.11 suggest the Si content of the Earth’s OC is 1.2–4 wt%, while core-mantle interaction models suggest up to 10.3 wt% Si7,12,13. In contrast, Morrison et al.14 reported that the density of hcp-Fe–11wt%Ni–6wt%Si (Fe0.8Ni0.1Si0.1) agrees with Earth’s IC density.
Mercury’s core composition
Mercury’s present day magnetic field is approximately 1% of the intensity of Earth’s magnetic field15. Thermal evolution models suggest the presence of a self-sustained chemically driven dynamo as a plausible source of Mercury’s present magnetic field16,17,18,19,20,21,22. The current estimates of Mercury’s internal structure place the CMB at 1800–2100 K and 5–7 GPa and the ICB at 2200–2500 K and 36 GPa23,24,25,26. Models considering the presence of a thermally stratified layer of Fe–S at the top of an Fe-rich core successfully generate a dynamo of similar intensity to present-day observations19,27,28,29. This layer decreases the temperature difference across the CMB which favours a sub-adiabatic heat flux on the core side of the CMB and thus dominant chemical convection in the liquid outer core. The state of this thermally stratified layer, whether it is liquid29,30 or solid31,32, depends on its light element content. Theoretical and experimental constraints on Mercury’s core composition indicate at least 5 wt%Si33 and up to 25 wt%Si34, while 10.5 wt% Si has been recently suggested as a more plausible content35,36. In fact, a sub-adiabatic Fe–(7–20wt%)Si core has been shown to stimulate IC solidification and generation of a dynamo26.
Venus’ core composition
Contrary to Earth and Mercury, Venus lacks a present-day magnetic field37. This is peculiar considering the similarity with Earth’s size and mass. The limited data on Venus’ interior are consistent with Earth’s bulk composition38,39,40. The core is thought to be electrically conductive41 and, although relatively weak because of a slow rotation rate, the Coriolis force provides sufficient kinetic energy to power an internal dynamo42,43. However, convection in the electrically conductive fluid is required to generate dynamo action1. The most probable interpretation of Venus’ lack of dynamo is therefore the absence of, or insufficient, convection in the core. The primordial structure of an Earth-like planet refers to a mantle composition similar to the bulk silicate Earth and a metal core that is at least partially liquid and chemically homogeneous containing 81.2wt% Fe, 7.5wt% Si, 5.1wt% Ni and other light elements such as O and S44. A core of solid Fe–Ni–Si (hcp-Fe–5wt%Ni–8wt%Si and hcp-Fe–5wt%Ni–4wt%Si) has recently been shown compatible with the lack of dynamo if a completely solidified core, rather than an Earth-like core, is considered45.
Adiabatic heat flux
The adiabatic heat flux density on the core side of the CMB (qad) is described as follows:
where kc is the thermal conductivity of the core, α is the thermal expansion coefficient of the core fluid, g is the gravitational acceleration, T is the temperature at the top of the core, and CP is the heat capacity at constant pressure (P) of the core fluid. Thermal conductivity of metals and metallic alloys is predominantly electron-based, while the phonon-based contribution often account for less than 2% or as much as 40% at 300 K depending on the material46. For example, the phonon component of thermal conductivity of Fe accounts for ~ 6.5% of the total conductivity at 1 atm and 300 K47, while that of Ni accounts for ~ 15% at the same conditions46. The electronic component of thermal conductivity (ke) can be calculated from measurements of electrical resistivity (ρ) via the Wiedemann–Franz Law (WFL):
where L0 is the constant theoretical Sommerfeld value (L0 = 2.44 × 10–8 WΩ K−2) of the Lorenz number (L). The value of L is specific to each metal and metallic-alloy and has been shown to be P- and T-dependent for Fe48. The Lorenz number can be determined from first-principle calculations or from independent measurements of k and ρ using multi-anvil presses or diamond-anvil cells. The effects of using the Sommerfeld value when calculating ke of ternary Fe-alloys remains unclear due to the lack of literature on the Lorenz number for such systems. In this study, we investigate the thermal state of Earth, Mercury and Venus interiors using direct measurements of ρ of Fe–10wt%Ni–10wt%Si (hereafter referred to as Fe10Ni10Si) and use the WFL to calculate ke in order to estimate qad. This work is motivated by the scarce information on relevant ternary systems at the P,T core conditions of terrestrial-type bodies. To our knowledge, this work consists of the first multi-anvil large volume sample results in the P range up to 25 GPa in both solid and liquid states for a core-mimetic ternary system.
Results
Analysis of the diffusion of the W-discs into the sample at 9 GPa suggests contamination begins in the partial melting zone, and only becomes significant well into the liquid state as shown in Fig. 1. Since the focus of this study is on the ρ values near the liquidus T (Tliquidus), contamination of the sample well above Tliquidus is not a concern.
The T dependence of ρ of Fe10Ni10Si is plotted in Fig. 2a. Electrical resistivity overall increases with T and decreases with P, in agreement with the recent measurements45 and with expectation for metallic behavior1. The peak observed near 1200 K, which decreases in amplitude with increasing P, is attributed to a possible order–disorder transition, similar to that observed in Fe8.5Si and as discussed previously49. Alternatively, this peak could indicate a phase transition in Fe10Ni10Si similar to the transition from bcc–fcc Fe at a similar temperature below 13 GPa although the P-dependence of the transition T is opposite to that for pure Fe. Our main results of this study do not hinge on the present qualitative interpretation of this phase since our focus is on the liquid state and the region just prior to melting. The inset of Fig. 2a shows consistency between ρ results at 1890 K in the partial melting and liquid state of this study and in the solid state of Zhang et al.45, suggesting that the effect of P on the isothermal ρ is diminished at higher pressures. This suggests there is little change in the magnitude of ρ on melting. This is supported by our detailed measurements and by the similar slopes of high T data from this study and that shown by the black line representing solid state hcp-Fe5Ni8Si45 in Fig. 2a,b. The beginning of the partial melting zone (e.g., 1573 K for the 3 GPa data) is defined by a slight positive change in slope near the expected melting T50. The P-dependence of the change in ρ with T (δρ/δT) while in the partial melting region and in the liquid state seems to be negligible above 12 GPa when compared with Zhang et al.45 datum at 140 GPa as shown in the inset plot of Fig. 2b. At all pressures, the solidus is defined by a reversal in slope following the decreasing limb of the maximum where ρ begins to increase with T. For the liquidus, where the indication at some pressures is a slight flattening of the slope of ρ with T followed by a subtle increase, the melting boundary of Fe8Ni10Si50 was used as a guide.
Figure 3a shows the melting relations of Fe10Ni10Si. Komabayashi51 suggested that the melting boundary of Fe–Ni–Si alloys cannot be simply explained by the combination of Fe–Ni and Fe–Si systems. In fact, the effect of Ni on the properties of Fe alloys is expected to be small in comparison to those of light elements since Ni and Fe have similar atomic numbers4,52,53. Torchio et al.52 showed that up to 36 wt% Ni in Fe does not affect the melting curve of Fe up to 100 GPa. The similarity between the measured melting boundary of Fe8.5Si49 and Fe10Ni10Si can thus be explained by the negligible influence of Ni. The negligible effect of Ni can also be observed in the similarity between the melting boundaries of Fe9Si54 and Fe8Ni10Si50 extrapolated to 1 atm from their lowest P measurement at 20 GPa and ~ 33 GPa, respectively.
Electrical resistivity is interpreted using the mean free path of conduction electrons, which depends on their scattering rate. Scattering can be caused by (i) electron–phonon interactions (scattering by lattice vibrations), (ii) electron-magnon interactions (spin-disorder scattering), (iii) electron–electron interactions which can include s-d transitions in Fe, and (iv) electron-impurities interactions. At high T, scattering mechanisms (i), (ii), and (iii) become increasingly important, whereas (iv) is expected to remain independent of T as described by Matthiessen’s rule59. Deviations from Matthiessen’s rule for Fe alloys are primarily attributed to the underestimation of the spin-disorder contribution to ρ60. Deviations may also be caused by anisotropies of the Fermi surface61, anisotropies in electron–phonon scattering62, the existence of two conductivity bands (s and d bands) each having a different contribution to conductivity, or changes in the T-dependence of ρ (i.e., ρ saturation)63. Berrada et al.56 suggested that the T-dependence of mechanism (iv) in Fe–Si alloys represents a deviation from Matthiessen’s rule. In contrast to T, P decreases the scattering rate as it suppresses the amplitude of vibration of atoms. Based on a cancellation of the P and T effects at the melting T, Stacey and Loper64 proposed that metals with a filled d-band (i.e., Cu, Zn, Ag and Au) would exhibit a constant ρ along the melting boundary. Yong et al.58 investigated this hypothesis with Fe and, although Fe has an unfilled d-band, observed a constant ρ behaviour from 6 to 24 GPa. Similar behaviour is observed in Fe8.5Si49,56 and in Fe10Ni10Si as shown in Fig. 3b. The constant ρ of Fe10Ni10Si is 133 µΩcm and 138 µΩ cm at Tsolidus and Tliquidus, respectively. These values are higher than the reported constant value of Fe8.5Si of 127 µΩcm, and that of Fe of 112 µΩ cm and 120 µΩ cm, on the solid and liquid sides of the melting boundary, respectively. The constant behaviour along the melting boundary may be attributed to insignificant changes in Fermi surface and mean free path upon melting57.
The calculated ke, shown in Fig. 4a, increases almost linearly with T which is different than the behaviour of pure Fe in the low temperature region but similar to the high temperature region57. A multi-variable linear regression analysis of the ρ values in the solid state from this study provides the following model of solid ke (T, P):
This relation is used to extrapolate the solid measurements to the P,T conditions of the Ohta et al.65, Zidane et al.66, and Zhang et al.67 solid state data, as shown in Fig. 4a. The extrapolated solid Fe10Ni10Si ke are in agreement with the reported solid calculations for the nearly similar compositions of Fe9Si67 and Fe11.9Ni13.4Si65 but result in a higher value than that reported for Fe11.7Ni10Si66 although the compositions are similar. In addition, a multi-variable linear regression analysis of the ρ values in the partial melting and liquid states, see Eq. (5), from this study suggest a negligible difference between solid and liquid values at high P,T.
Equations (4) and (5) are not founded in any elementary physical theory, they are simply linear fits of our measurements. Figure 4b illustrates the similarity in the calculated ke of Fe10Ni10Si and Fe8.5Si, apart from the deviations at high T observed at 9 GPa. The similarities in Fe10Ni10Si and Fe8.5Si observed in the melting T and ke suggest the addition of 10wt% Ni to Fe8.5Si has negligible effects on the properties of Fe8.5Si49. The similarity in the extrapolated solid and liquid Fe10Ni10Si ke with the calculated Fe9Si67 as shown in Fig. 4a indicates the negligible effect of Ni. In contrast, the disagreement with the Fe11.7Ni10Si datum at 330 GPa66 indicates a steady P-dependence from 3 to 183 GPa, followed by an attenuated P-dependence up to 360 GPa. Finally, the slight variations in ke of Fe10Ni10Si with T coincide with those observed in ρ, the T dependence of ke seems to weaken at high T.
Earth
Earth’s CMB (4000 K, 136 GPa) and ICB (5000 K, 330 GPa) conditions are difficult to reach in laboratory settings. Previous thermodynamic models and experimental studies considering a pure Fe core have suggested a kc of 30–40 Wm−1 K−1, which indicates an adiabatic heat flow of 4–6 TW on the core side of CMB as given by Eq. (6)64,68.
where rc is core radius (3480 km)69, gCMB is gravitational attraction at CMB (10.68 m/s2)69, γ is Grüneisen’s parameter (1.5)70, and ϕ is seismic parameter (65.05 km2/s2)69. Zhang et al.45 estimated an adiabatic heat flow of 8 TW for an Fe5Ni8Si outer core from ρ measurements using the diamond-anvil cell. On the other hand, shock compression experiments on the melting boundary of Fe12Ni12.7Si, which has a greater Si content than Fe5Ni8Si, suggest a higher adiabatic heat flow of 13–19 TW50. Using Eqs. (4) and (5), we calculate ke of ~ 94 W m−1 K−1 for both solid and liquid states at 4000 K and 136 GPa. Using Eq. (6) with the previous parameters, the adiabatic heat flow at the top of Earth’s core just below the CMB is estimated to be 14 TW for an Fe10Ni10Si outer core which is similar to that of Fe12Ni12.7Si50. The possibility of additional light elements in the core is expected to result in a lower thermal conductivity than that reported in this study, and thus a lower heat flow at the top of the core. The present-day heat flow across the CMB is not well defined and reported estimates vary considerably: 8 TW71, 5–15 TW72, ~ 15 TW73, ~ 5 TW74, ~ 12 TW75. Based on such a wide range of values, a reasonable conclusion on Earth’s active source of dynamo action may not yet seem possible. However, when compared to a very recent study where a multi-disciplinary and self-consistent approach was used to estimate a heat flow across the CMB of 15 TW76, the lower adiabatic heat flow value of 14 TW at the top of the core suggests that thermal convection may still be an active source of energy to power the geodynamo.
Mercury
The calculated qad for Mercury using α of 8.9 × 10–5 K−148, g of 4.0 m/s277, Cp of 835 J Kg−1 K−178, and liquid ke5–7GPa of 29.6–35.9 Wm−1 K−1 from this study corresponds to a heat flux density of 22.7–32.1 mW/m2 via Eq. (1). This estimate of qad intersects models of the heat flux through the CMB (qCMB) between 0.02 and 0.21 Gyr after formation as shown in Fig. 5, depending on the thermal evolution model selected.
Although thermal evolution models of Fe10Ni10Si are not available in the literature, it is reasonable to assume, based on the similarities with Fe8.5Si observed in this study, that such a model would intersect the calculated qad between that of Fe and Fe17Si83. Within the precision of the models, this tight constraint suggests the transition from super- to sub-adiabatic heat flow through the CMB took place prior to 0.21 Gyr after formation. The thermal evolution model of Knibbe and Van Hoolst84, which considers a thermally stratified layer above an adiabatic core, implies a sub-adiabatic core as early as 0.02 Gyr after formation as it intersects the calculated qad from this study. As qCMB becomes lower than qad, at least the top of the core becomes sub-adiabatic and stimulates the nucleation of an IC. Indeed, a sub-adiabatic heat flow at the top of the core is not necessarily representative of that throughout the core as the increased P and latent heat with depth suggest a super-adiabatic deep core26. This time period is in agreement with several thermal evolution models of the core that suggest the formation of an IC, and sub-adiabatic profile, occurred within the first 0.10 Gyr18,21,22. Similarly, remanent magnetization observed in volcanic plains on the surface of Mercury imply an active dynamo at the time the volcanic plains formed (~ 3.7–3.9 Gyr ago) or earlier85,86,87,88,89, which is consistent with our findings.
Venus
It has been suggested that the lack of tectonic activity on Venus produces an insulating effect that causes a high mantle T and therefore reduces the heat flux out of the core, resulting in the low probability of dynamo action42,73,90. O'Rourke et al.91 proposed that the lack of dynamo in Venus, assuming an Earth-like core structure, can only be explained if the core is cooling too slowly to convect, which corresponds to kc of 100 Wm−1 K−1 or more. An Earth-like structure refers to a solid metallic inner core and an outer core that is at least partially liquid. Nonetheless, lower kc values in the range of ∼40–50 Wm−1 K−1 favour scenarios where the lack of dynamo is due to a core that has completely solidified or preserved its primordial compositional stratification as it was unable to grow fast enough44,73,91. In this scenario, the mixing in the core was insufficient to generate a dynamo. Zhang et al.45 proposed an Fe–Ni-Si (hcp-Fe5Ni8Si and hcp-Fe5Ni4Si) core conductivity of ∼52–73 Wm−1 K−1, which promotes a sub-adiabatic core and agrees with a solid or completely stratified core scenario91. Using Eqs. (4) and (5), we calculate solid and liquid ke of 140 Wm−1 K−1 and 148 Wm−1 K−1, respectively, at 275 GPa and 5160 K39. If the P-dependence of ρ is indeed attenuated above 183 GPa, these ke values are overestimated although the expected values remain above 100 Wm−1 K−1. Contrary to Zhang et al.45, these results suggest that Venus may have a solid inner and liquid outer core73,91. In this case, the heat flow across the CMB does not exceed the adiabatic heat flow and thermal convection cannot take place, while suggesting that compositional convection is not enough to power Venus’ dynamo91. The future NASA mission VERITAS is expected to provide further constraints on the interior structure of Venus92.
Discussion
The measured ρ of solid and liquid Fe10Ni10Si from 3 to 20 GPa shows a general increase with T and decrease with P. At melting, ρ remains invariant within error bars, similar to the behaviour of Fe8.5Si49 and Fe58, suggesting an invariant Fermi surface and mean free path upon melting. Further measurements are necessary to determine the extension of this behaviour at higher P,T conditions. A linear multi-variable regression analysis is done with the calculated ke and the resulting relation is used to calculate the adiabatic heat flow on the core side of Earth’s CMB. A core of Fe10Ni10Si would provide a heat flow of 14 TW at the top of Earth’s core. Thermal convection appears to be an active source of energy for the geodynamo today if high values of estimates of heat flow through the CMB are used. In addition, ke values between 5 and 7 GPa are used to calculate Mercury’s qad. When compared to qCMB82,83,84, the calculated value for qad suggests a sub-adiabatic uppermost core, and thus a magnetic field primarily powered by chemical convection, between 0.02 and 0.21 Gyr after formation. Finally, ke at Venus’ interior conditions is estimated and is found to be in agreement with scenarios of an Earth-like core structure, suggesting a solid inner core and at least partially liquid outer core. The conclusions are obtained assuming 10 wt% Ni and 10 wt% Si in the cores of these planets, although the exact concentration of each light element remains uncertain. When compared to the literature, our results show that the Fe–8.5wt%Si system and Fe–10wt%Ni–10wt%Si system have similar properties, suggesting that Ni could be present in a core system but not clearly observed.
Methods
Measurements were carried out on a sample of Fe10Ni10Si at P from 3 to 20 GPa and at T up to 2200 K including the liquid state. The Fe10Ni10Si sample was initially obtained (99.95% purity, ChemPur) in powder form and then melted into a wire of 0.51 mm diameter as described by Berrada et al.56. The length of the sample varied according to the cell dimensions49. High T was achieved by passing an AC current (I) through a 0.05 mm thick cylindrical Re foil furnace surrounding the ceramic enclosed sample, while high P was achieved in a 3000-ton multi-anvil press. A four-wire method, as described by Silber et al.57, was used to pass a test current through the sample in order to obtain the voltage drop across the sample (V). A polarity switch reversed the current in order to expose any parasitic potentials that could be removed. Using the same four wires in an alternate mode, T at each end of the wire-shaped sample was also measured. A Keysight B2961 power supply provided a constant test DC of 0.2 A and a Keysight 34470A data acquisition meter operating at 20 Hz and 1 µV resolution recorded voltage. The four wires consisted of two type-C (95%W5%Re–74%W26%Re) thermocouples (TC). Contact between each end of the sample and a TC was ensured through W-discs placed between the sample and wires. The contribution of the W-discs in the voltage drop between two opposite electrodes was later subtracted using available high P and T measurements of ρ93. A combination of Ohm’s and Pouillet’s laws was used to calculate ρ:
where \(A\) is the cross-sectional area and \(l\) the length of the sample. The uncertainties in T (± 5 K at low T, ± 25 K at high T), V, \(A\) and \(l\) measurements correspond to the respective standard deviations of at least 10 measurements for each data point obtained. The uncertainty on the measured geometry and averaged voltage drop at a particular T were used to evaluate the errors on ρ and ke. Once the target T was reached, T was quenched and the recovered sample was polished to its central cross-section in order to recover the sample geometry. The chemical composition of the sample was then analyzed with a JEOL JXA-8530F field-emission electron microprobe operating with a 50 nA probe current, a 20 kV accelerating voltage, and a 10 µm spot-size beam. Electron microprobe analysis of the starting material in wire shape indicates a homogenous sample composted of 80.48wt%Fe with 9.94wt%Ni and 9.59wt%Si. The continuity of the starting material in wire shape was confirmed with computed tomography (CT) scans with 50 µm resolution. XRD analysis performed on powder obtained from the Fe10Ni10Si wire confirmed a homogenous bcc structure of the starting sample.
Data availability
All experimental data are available at http://dx.doi.org/10.17632/mj37m8wcw7.1.
References
Christensen, U. R. Planetary Magnetic Fields and Dynamos (Oxford University Press, 2019).
Vázquez, M., Pallé, E. & Rodríguez, P. M. Ch. The Worlds Out There 316–317 (Springer, 2010).
Ohta, K. & Hirose, K. The thermal conductivity of the Earth’s core and implications for its thermal and compositional evolution. Natl. Sci. Rev. https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwaa303 (2020).
Poirier, J.-P. Light elements in the Earth’s outer core: A critical review. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 85, 319–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9201(94)90120-1 (1994).
Litasov, K. D. & Shatskiy, A. F. Composition of the Earth’s core: A review. Russ. Geol. Geophys. 57, 22–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rgg.2016.01.003 (2016).
Birch, F. Elasticity and constitution of the Earth’s interior. J. Geophys. Res. 1896–1977(57), 227–286. https://doi.org/10.1029/JZ057i002p00227 (1952).
Allègre, C. J., Poirier, J.-P., Humler, E. & Hofmann, A. W. The chemical composition of the Earth. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 134, 515–526. https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-821X(95)00123-T (1995).
Stacey, F. D. & Anderson, O. L. Electrical and thermal conductivities of Fe–Ni–Si alloy under core conditions. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 124, 153–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9201(01)00186-8 (2001).
Anderson, O. L. & Isaak, D. G. Another look at the core density deficit of Earth’s outer core. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 131, 19–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9201(02)00017-1 (2002).
McDonough, W. F. In Treatise on Geochemistry (eds Holland, H. D. & Turekian, K. K.) 547–568 (Pergamon, 2003).
Antonangeli, D. et al. Composition of the Earth’s inner core from high-pressure sound velocity measurements in Fe–Ni–Si alloys. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 295, 292–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2010.04.018 (2010).
Javoy, M. The integral enstatite chondrite model of the Earth. Geophys. Res. Lett. 22, 2219–2222. https://doi.org/10.1029/95GL02015 (1995).
Wade, J. & Wood, B. J. Core formation and the oxidation state of the Earth. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 236, 78–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2005.05.017 (2005).
Morrison, R. A., Jackson, J. M., Sturhahn, W., Zhang, D. & Greenberg, E. Equations of state and anisotropy of Fe-Ni-Si alloys. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 123, 4647–4675. https://doi.org/10.1029/2017JB015343 (2018).
Ness, N. F., Behannon, K. W., Lepping, R. P. & Whang, Y. C. Observations of Mercury’s magnetic field. Icarus 28, 479–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/0019-1035(76)90121-4 (1976).
Stevenson, D. J., Spohn, T. & Schubert, G. Magnetism and thermal evolution of the terrestrial planets. Icarus 54, 466–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/0019-1035(83)90241-5 (1983).
Schubert, G., Ross, M. N., Stevenson, D. J. & Spohn, T. Mercury’s Thermal History and the Generation of Its Magnetic Field (University of Arizona Press, 1988).
Hauck, S. A., Dombard, A. J., Phillips, R. J. & Solomon, S. C. Internal and tectonic evolution of Mercury. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 222, 713–728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2004.03.037 (2004).
Christensen, U. R. A deep dynamo generating Mercury’s magnetic field. Nature 444, 1056–1058. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05342 (2006).
Anderson, B. J. et al. The global magnetic field of mercury from MESSENGER orbital observations. Science 333, 1859–1862. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1211001 (2011).
Grott, M., Breuer, D. & Laneuville, M. Thermo-chemical evolution and global contraction of mercury. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 307, 135–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2011.04.040 (2011).
Tosi, N., Grott, M., Plesa, A. C. & Breuer, D. Thermochemical evolution of Mercury’s interior. J. Geophys. Res. Planets 118, 2474–2487. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgre.20168 (2013).
Breuer, D., Hauck, S. A., Buske, M., Pauer, M. & Spohn, T. Interior evolution of Mercury. Space Sci. Rev. 132, 229–260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-007-9228-9 (2007).
Hauck, S. A. et al. The curious case of Mercury’s internal structure. J. Geophys. Res. Planets 118, 1204–1220. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgre.20091 (2013).
Breuer, D., Rueckriemen, T. & Spohn, T. Iron snow, crystal floats, and inner-core growth: Modes of core solidification and implications for dynamos in terrestrial planets and moons. Prog. Earth Planet Sci. 2, 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40645-015-0069-y (2015).
Knibbe, J. S. & van Westrenen, W. The thermal evolution of Mercury’s Fe-Si core. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 482, 147–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2017.11.006 (2018).
Christensen, U. R. & Wicht, J. Models of magnetic field generation in partly stable planetary cores: Applications to Mercury and Saturn. Icarus 196, 16–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2008.02.013 (2008).
Dumberry, M. & Rivoldini, A. Mercury’s inner core size and core-crystallization regime. Icarus 248, 254–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2014.10.038 (2015).
Pommier, A., Leinenweber, K. & Tran, T. Mercury’s thermal evolution controlled by an insulating liquid outermost core?. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 517, 125–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2019.04.022 (2019).
Buono, A. S. & Walker, D. The Fe-rich liquidus in the Fe–FeS system from 1bar to 10GPa. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 75, 2072–2087. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2011.01.030 (2011).
Smith, D. E. et al. Gravity field and internal structure of mercury from MESSENGER. Science 336, 214–217. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1218809 (2012).
Stevenson, D. J. Mercury’s mysteries start to unfold. Nature 485, 52–53. https://doi.org/10.1038/485052a (2012).
Malavergne, V., Toplis, M. J., Berthet, S. & Jones, J. Highly reducing conditions during core formation on Mercury: Implications for internal structure and the origin of a magnetic field. Icarus 206, 199–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2009.09.001 (2010).
Chabot, N. L., Wollack, E. A., Klima, R. L. & Minitti, M. E. Experimental constraints on Mercury’s core composition. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 390, 199–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2014.01.004 (2014).
Terasaki, H. et al. Pressure and composition effects on sound velocity and density of core-forming liquids: Implication to core compositions of terrestrial planets. J. Geophys. Res. Planets 124, 2272–2293. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JE005936 (2019).
Steinbrügge, G. et al. Challenges on Mercury’s interior structure posed by the new measurements of its obliquity and tides. Geophys. Res. Lett. 48, e2020GL089895. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL089895 (2021).
Taylor, F. W., Svedhem, H. & Head, J. W. Venus: The atmosphere, climate, surface, interior and near-space environment of an earth-like planet. Space Sci. Rev. 214, 35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-018-0467-8 (2018).
Surkov, Y. A. et al. Venus rock composition at the Vega 2 Landing site. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 91, E215–E218. https://doi.org/10.1029/JB091iB13p0E215 (1986).
Aitta, A. Venus’ internal structure, temperature and core composition. Icarus 218, 967–974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2012.01.007 (2012).
Dumoulin, C., Tobie, G., Verhoeven, O., Rosenblatt, P. & Rambaux, N. Tidal constraints on the interior of Venus. J. Geophys. Res. Planets 122, 1338–1352. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JE005249 (2017).
Konopliv, A. S. & Yoder, C. F. Venusian k2 tidal Love number from Magellan and PVO tracking data. Geophys. Res. Lett. 23, 1857–1860. https://doi.org/10.1029/96GL01589 (1996).
Stevenson, D. J. Planetary magnetic fields. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 208, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-821X(02)01126-3 (2003).
Olson, P. & Christensen, U. R. Dipole moment scaling for convection-driven planetary dynamos. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 250, 561–571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2006.08.008 (2006).
Jacobson, S. A., Rubie, D. C., Hernlund, J., Morbidelli, A. & Nakajima, M. Formation, stratification, and mixing of the cores of Earth and Venus. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 474, 375–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2017.06.023 (2017).
Zhang, Y. et al. Transport properties of Fe-Ni-Si alloys at Earth’s core conditions: Insight into the viability of thermal and compositional convection. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 553, 116614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2020.116614 (2021).
Tong, Z., Li, S., Ruan, X. & Bao, H. Comprehensive first-principles analysis of phonon thermal conductivity and electron-phonon coupling in different metals. Phys. Rev. B 100, 144306. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.100.144306 (2019).
Williams, R. K., Yarbrough, D. W., Masey, J. W., Holder, T. K. & Graves, R. S. Experimental determination of the phonon and electron components of the thermal conductivity of bcc iron. J. Appl. Phys. 52, 5167–5175. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.329418 (1981).
Secco, R. A. Thermal conductivity and Seebeck coefficient of Fe and Fe-Si alloys: Implications for variable Lorenz number. Renew. Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.01.061 (2017).
Berrada, M., Secco, R. A. & Yong, W. Adiabatic heat flow in Mercury’s core from electrical resistivity measurements of liquid Fe-8.5wt%Si to 24 GPa. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. (2021).
Zhang, Y. et al. Shock compression and melting of an Fe-Ni-Si alloy: Implications for the temperature profile of the earth’s core and the heat flux across the core-mantle boundary. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 123, 1314–1327. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JB014723 (2018).
Komabayashi, T. Thermodynamics of melting relations in the system Fe-FeO at high pressure: Implications for oxygen in the Earth’s core. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 119, 4164–4177. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JB010980 (2014).
Torchio, R. et al. Melting curve and phase relations of Fe-Ni alloys: Implications for the earth’s core composition. Geophys. Res. Lett. 47, e2020GL088169. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL088169 (2020).
Lenhart, E. M. & Secco, R. A. Implications for the energy source for an early dynamo in Vesta from experiments on electrical resistivity of liquid Fe-10wt%Ni at high pressures. Icarus 378, 114962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2022.114962 (2022).
Fischer, R. A. et al. Phase relations in the Fe–FeSi system at high pressures and temperatures. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 373, 54–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2013.04.035 (2013).
Bundy, F. P. Pressure—temperature phase diagram of iron to 200 kbar, 900°C. J. Appl. Phys. 36, 616–620. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1714038 (1965).
Berrada, M., Secco, R. A. & Yong, W. Electrical resistivity measurements of Fe-Si with implications for the early lunar dynamo. J. Geophys. Res. Planets. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JE006380 (2020).
Silber, R. E., Secco, R. A., Yong, W. & Littleton, J. A. H. Electrical resistivity of liquid Fe to 12 GPa: Implications for heat flow in cores of terrestrial bodies. Sci. Rep. 8, 10758. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-28921-w (2018).
Yong, W., Secco, R. A., Littleton, J. A. H. & Silber, R. E. The iron invariance: implications for thermal convection in Earth’s core. Geophys. Res. Lett. 46, 11065–11070. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019gl084485 (2019).
Matthiessen, A. & Vogt, C. IV. On the influence of temperature on the electric conducting-power of alloys. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 154, 167–200. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstl.1864.0004 (1864).
Glasbrenner, J. K., Pujari, B. S. & Belashchenko, K. D. Deviations from Matthiessen’s rule and resistivity saturation effects in Gd and Fe from first principles. Phys. Rev. B 89, 174408. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.89.174408 (2014).
Fischer, K. Deviations from the Matthiessen rule. Physik der kondensierten Materie 6, 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02422837 (1967).
Schwerer, F. C., Conroy, J. W. & Arajs, S. Matthiessen’s rule and the electrical resistivity of iron-silicon solid solutions. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 30, 1513–1525. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3697(69)90213-3 (1969).
Alldredge, O. R., DeFord, J. W. & Sosin, A. Deviation from Matthiessen’s rule in electron-irradiated copper. Phys. Rev. B 11, 2860–2870. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.11.2860 (1975).
Stacey, F. D. & Loper, D. E. A revised estimate of the conductivity of iron alloy at high pressure and implications for the core energy balance. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 161, 13–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2006.12.001 (2007).
Ohta, K., Kuwayama, Y., Hirose, K., Shimizu, K. & Ohishi, Y. Experimental determination of the electrical resistivity of iron at Earth’s core conditions. Nature 534, 95–98. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature17957 (2016).
Zidane, M. et al. Electrical and thermal transport properties of Fe–Ni based ternary alloys in the earth’s inner core: An ab initio study. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 301, 106465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2020.106465 (2020).
Zhang, Y. et al. Thermal conductivity of Fe-Si alloys and thermal stratification in Earth’s core. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 119, e2119001119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2119001119 (2022).
Konôpková, Z., McWilliams, R. S., Gómez-Pérez, N. & Goncharov, A. F. Direct measurement of thermal conductivity in solid iron at planetary core conditions. Nature 534, 99–101. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18009 (2016).
Dziewonski, A. M. & Anderson, D. L. Preliminary reference Earth model. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 25, 297–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9201(81)90046-7 (1981).
Hirose, K., Labrosse, S. & Hernlund, J. Composition and state of the core. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 41, 657–691. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-earth-050212-124007 (2013).
Anderson, O. L. The power balance at the core–mantle boundary. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 131, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9201(02)00009-2 (2002).
Lay, T., Hernlund, J. & Buffett, B. A. Core–mantle boundary heat flow. Nat. Geosci. 1, 25–32. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo.2007.44 (2008).
Driscoll, P. & Bercovici, D. On the thermal and magnetic histories of Earth and Venus: Influences of melting, radioactivity, and conductivity. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 236, 36–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2014.08.004 (2014).
Nakagawa, T. & Tackley, P. J. Influence of plate tectonic mode on the coupled thermochemical evolution of Earth’s mantle and core. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 16, 3400–3413. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GC005996 (2015).
Patočka, V., Šrámek, O. & Tosi, N. Minimum heat flow from the core and thermal evolution of the Earth. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 305, 106457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2020.106457 (2020).
Frost, D. A. et al. Multidisciplinary constraints on the thermal-chemical boundary between earth’s core and mantle. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 23, e2021GC009764. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GC009764 (2022).
Rivoldini, A. & Van Hoolst, T. The interior structure of Mercury constrained by the low-degree gravity field and the rotation of Mercury. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 377–378, 62–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2013.07.021 (2013).
Desai, P. D. Thermodynamic properties of iron and silicon. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 15, 967–983. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.555761 (1986).
Silber, R. E., Secco, R. A., Yong, W. & Littleton, J. A. H. Heat flow in earth’s core from invariant electrical resistivity of Fe-Si on the melting boundary to 9 GPa: Do light elements matter?. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 124, 5521–5543. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019jb017375 (2019).
Ezenwa, I. C. & Secco, R. A. Fe melting transition: electrical resistivity, thermal conductivity, and heat flow at the inner core boundaries of mercury and ganymede. Crystals 9 (2019).
Deng, L., Seagle, C., Fei, Y. & Shahar, A. High pressure and temperature electrical resistivity of iron and implications for planetary cores. Geophys. Res. Lett. 40, 33–37. https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL054347 (2013).
Ogawa, M. Evolution of the interior of Mercury influenced by coupled magmatism-mantle convection system and heat flux from the core. J. Geophys. Res. Planets 121, 118–136. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JE004832 (2016).
Knibbe, J. S. & van Westrenen, W. In 48th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference (The Woodlands, Texas. LPI Contribution No. 1964, id. 1094, 2017).
Knibbe, J. S. & Van Hoolst, T. Modelling of thermal stratification at the top of a planetary core: Application to the cores of Earth and Mercury and the thermal coupling with their mantles. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 321, 106804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2021.106804 (2021).
Johnson, C. L. et al. Low-altitude magnetic field measurements by MESSENGER reveal Mercury’s ancient crustal field. Science 348, 892–895. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa8720 (2015).
Hood, L. L. Initial mapping of Mercury’s crustal magnetic field: Relationship to the Caloris impact basin. Geophys. Res. Lett. 42, 10565–510572. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL066451 (2015).
Hood, L. L. Magnetic anomalies concentrated near and within Mercury’s impact basins: Early mapping and interpretation. J. Geophys. Res. 121, 1016–1025 (2016).
Peterson Georgia, A., Johnson Catherine, L. & Jellinek, A. M. Thermal evolution of Mercury with a volcanic heat-pipe flux: Reconciling early volcanism, tectonism, and magnetism. Sci. Adv. 7, 2482. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abh2482 (2021).
Tikoo, S. M. & Evans, A. J. Dynamos in the inner solar system. Ann. Rev. Earth Plan. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-earth-032320-102418 (2022).
Nimmo, F. Why does Venus lack a magnetic field?. Geology 30, 987–990. https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(2002)030%3c0987:Wdvlam%3e2.0.Co;2 (2002).
O’Rourke, J. G., Gillmann, C. & Tackley, P. Prospects for an ancient dynamo and modern crustal remanent magnetism on Venus. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 502, 46–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2018.08.055 (2018).
Cascioli, G. et al. The determination of the rotational state and interior structure of venus with VERITAS. Plan. Sci. J. 2, 220. https://doi.org/10.3847/psj/ac26c0 (2021).
Littleton, J. A. H., Secco, R. A., Yong, W. & Berrada, M. Electrical resistivity and thermal conductivity of W and Re up to 5 GPa and 2300 K. J. Appl. Phys. 125, 135901. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5066103 (2019).
Acknowledgements
We thank the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments. This work was supported by funds to R.A.S. from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (Grant Number 2018-05021) and the Canada Foundation for Innovation (Project Number 11860).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
M.B. conceived the design for the experimental pressure cells; M.B. and W.Y. performed the experiments; M.B. analyzed the data; M.B. and R.A.S wrote and revised the manuscript. R.A.S provided funding for the project. All authors reviewed and approved the manuscript prior to submission.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Berrada, M., Secco, R.A. & Yong, W. Resistivity of solid and liquid Fe–Ni–Si with applications to the cores of Earth, Mercury and Venus. Sci Rep 12, 9941 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-14130-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-14130-z
This article is cited by
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.