Abstract
Ultra-high-density (UHD) mapping can improve scar area detection and fast activation mapping in patients undergoing catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT). The aim of the present study was to compare the outcome after VT ablation guided by UHD and conventional point-by-point 3D-mapping. The acute and long-term ablation outcome of 61 consecutive patients with UHD mapping (64-electrode mini-basket catheter) was compared to 61 consecutive patients with conventional point-by-point 3D-mapping using a 3.5 mm tip catheter. Patients, whose ablation was guided by UHD mapping had an improved 24-months outcome in comparison to patients with conventional mapping (cumulative incidence estimate of the combination of recurrence or disease-related death of 52.4% (95% confidence interval (CI) [36.9–65.7]; recurrence: n = 25; disease-related death: n = 4) versus 69.6% (95% CI [55.9–79.8]); recurrence: n = 31; disease-related death n = 11). In a cause-specific Cox proportional hazards model, UHD mapping (hazard ratio (HR) 0.623; 95% CI [0.390–0.995]; P = 0.048) and left ventricular ejection fraction > 30% (HR 0.485; 95% CI [0.290–0.813]; P = 0.006) were independently associated with lower rates of recurrence or disease-related death. Other procedural parameters were similar in both groups. In conclusion, UHD mapping during VT ablation was associated with fewer VT recurrences or disease-related deaths during long-term follow-up in comparison to conventional point-by-point mapping. Complication rates and other procedural parameters were similar in both groups.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Episodes of ventricular tachycardia (VT) and shocks by implanted cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) are associated with an increased mortality and morbidity in patients with structural heart disease1. Besides optimal treatment of heart failure and concomitant conditions2,3, catheter ablation has become the gold standard to prevent recurring episodes4. Still, recurrences are sometimes seen, especially in patients with advanced stages of structural heart disease and heart failure5. Often a substrate-based ablation approach, targeting low-voltage areas and local abnormal ventricular activation (LAVA) is chosen, especially when mapping during active VT is hemodynamically not tolerated6. Recent studies have shown that ablation covering the entire substrate achieves a better outcome than incomplete substrate modification7. Yet, the detection of abnormal signals may depend on the hard- and software used, as subtle non-transmural myocardial scars might not always be identified with 3.5 mm tip catheters8. Multi-electrode mapping of abnormal electrograms has been found to increase the sensitivity of identification of scar areas7. Small and closely spaced electrodes facilitate the depiction of distinct electrograms as e.g., diastolic signals and might improve the differentiation between near- and far-field signals9.
It remains to be demonstrated, whether these insights into the mechanisms of arrhythmia are only of academic interest or if they improve ablation success. Therefore, we aimed to investigate if ablation guided by ultra-high-density (UHD) mapping leads to a better ablation outcome than conventional point-by-point 3D-mapping.
Methods
Study design
This single center sequential comparison included 122 patients that presented for ablation of scar-related VT at our tertiary care hospital (study design see Fig. 1). The acute and long-term outcome of patients with UHD mapping was retrospectively compared to patients with conventional point-by-point 3D-mapping. Sixty-one consecutive patients (2016–2018) had ablation guided by UHD mapping (UHD group; 64-electrode mini-basket catheter in conjunction with a 3.5 mm tip ablation catheter). UHD mapping was introduced at the study center in 2015; patient inclusion started six months after introduction to minimize a learning curve effect. The patient data was compared to 61 consecutive patients with conventional point-by-point 3D-mapping (conventional mapping group; 3.5 mm tip catheter only), treated before the introduction of UHD mapping (2013–2015). Patients with idiopathic VT were excluded from the study.
Electrophysiological evaluation and instrumentation
Conscious sedation was administered to most patients except for a few that required general anaesthesia. Reversible causes of VT were excluded before the procedure. Detailed procedural methods have been described before10. Briefly, the catheter setting consisted of a 6 French (F) quadripolar diagnostic catheter, placed in the right ventricular (RV) apex to induce VT by programmed stimulation with a fixed protocol. A catheter in the coronary sinus served as a reference for the 3D-electroanatomical mapping system in most cases. Unfractionated Heparin was administered intravenously to maintain an activated clotting time > 300 s in patients with UHD mapping and > 250 s in patients with conventional mapping during the procedure.
Ultra-high-density 3D-mapping
UHD mapping was performed using the Rhythmia™ (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA) mapping system as previously described10,11. An expandable, 64-polar mini-basket catheter (Orion™, Boston Scientific) comprising eight splines with eight electrodes each (electrode spacing 2.5 mm, electrode surface area 0.4 mm2) and an open-irrigated 3.5 mm tip mapping and ablation catheter (INTELLANAV™ OI / IntellaNAV MIFI™ OI, Boston Scientific) were introduced into the left ventricle (LV)12. Access to the LV was gained either by transseptal access after a single transseptal puncture using a fixed curve long sheath (SL0, 8.5 F, St. Jude Medical, Saint Paul, MN, USA; for ablation catheter) and a long steerable sheath (Agilis large curve, 8.5 F, St. Jude Medical, for mini-basket catheter) or by retrograde aortic access (Terumo 8 F, Leuven, Belgium).
At first, an electroanatomical substrate map was acquired with the basket catheter and subsequently completed with the single-tip ablation catheter in less accessible areas (see Fig. 2A). Following this, if hemodynamically tolerated, VT was induced and activation mapping during VT was performed. In patients presenting with VT at the beginning of the procedure, activation mapping was conducted before substrate mapping. Electrogram annotation was performed automatically by the mapping system (Lumipoint™ software module) as previously described10.
In line with previous studies for scar demarcation a bipolar endocardial voltage of 0.2/1 mV (dense scar < 0.2 mV, border zone 0.2–1.0 mV, healthy tissue > 1.0 mV) with individual adaptation was chosen10,13. All voltage maps were generated during sinus rhythm or paced rhythm from coronary sinus or ventricle. Whenever VT was inducible and hemodynamically tolerated, activation mapping was performed. Hemodynamic instability was defined as mean arterial blood pressure below 50 mmHg. Additional entrainment or pace mapping was performed at the operator’s discretion.
Conventional point-by-point 3D-mapping
Conventional point-by-point 3D-mapping was performed using an electroanatomical 3D-mapping system (Carto® 3 System, Biosense Webster, Irvine, CA, USA). The detailed approach has been described elsewhere14. In brief, similarly to the UHD group, a sequential approach was performed during all procedures. An endocardial voltage map was acquired through a retrograde and/or antegrade transseptal access using a steerable ablation catheter (THERMOCOOL®, D- or F-Type, 2-5-2 mm spacing; Biosense Webster, see Fig. 2B). LAVA, including fractionated and late potentials as well as areas of scar (voltage < 1.5 mV), were marked and later considered for ablation. After that, VT was induced using programmed stimulation. If VT was induced and hemodynamically tolerated, entrainment mapping was performed using the Stimulus-to-QRS delay, the ratio of Stimulus-to-QRS delay to VT cycle length (CL) and the endocardial activation time in comparison to the surface ECG to identify the critical isthmus. Furthermore, areas with middiastolic activation during ongoing VT were considered an ablation target. Pace mapping was performed at the operator’s discretion.
VT ablation and follow-up
The VT ablation strategy has been described before10. In brief, we aimed to achieve the combined procedural endpoint of VT non-inducibility and substrate modification in both groups. Radiofrequency current was used for complete abolition of all abnormal electrograms including fractionated potentials, highly fractionated potentials, late potentials, and fractionated late potentials10,15,16. Subsequently, targeted regions were remapped to demonstrate elimination of the respective electrograms. Radiofrequency current was applied with a maximum power of 40 W (upper temperature limit was set to 48 °C) at an irrigation rate of 17–30 mL/min. After discharge, amiodarone was continued at the operator’s discretion. Patients were seen in our outpatient clinic, including device interrogation, after three months and every three to six months subsequently, depending on individual symptoms. The electronic patient charts were reviewed by a senior electrophysiologist for the acquisition of patient characteristics, procedural parameters, and follow-up. In case of missing follow-up visits the patient’s cardiologist and general practitioner were contacted. A recurrence was defined as any sustained or non-sustained VT, documented by device interrogation or ECG. Disease-related death was defined as sudden cardiac death due to ventricular arrhythmia or cardiogenic shock in combination with or caused by ventricular tachycardia.
Statistical analysis
Descriptive statistics are presented as count and percentage for categorical variables and as mean ± standard deviation for continuous variables if normally distributed (assessed visually using histograms) or median (interquartile range (IQR)) otherwise. Patient and treatment characteristics were compared with Fisher’s exact test or Mann–Whitney U test, respectively. The cumulative probabilities of recurrence or disease-related death over time were estimated and compared between groups using cumulative incidence functions accounting for the competing event non-disease-related death. Estimates for recurrence or disease-related death are presented with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Cumulative incidence curves are truncated at 24 months. A cause-specific Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess the relationship between covariates and time to recurrence or disease-related death. The covariates “mapping technique”, “age (scaled in decades)”, “sex”, “body mass index (BMI)”, “type of cardiomyopathy”, “chronic kidney disease”, “left ventricular ejection fraction (LV-EF)” and “antiarrhythmic drug therapy (AAD)” before ablation were chosen according to recent data on recurrence prediction after VT ablation as well as clinical relevance and included into the model17. According to the Grambsch-Thernau test, the proportional hazards assumption is reasonable for all covariates. Two-way interactions between mapping technique and other covariates were found not to be significant and hence eliminated from the model in a backward selection based on the Akaike information criterion. Hazard ratios are presented with 95% confidence intervals as well as Wald P values and displayed in a forest plot. The reported P values are used as descriptive measures only. P values less than 0.05 are regarded statistically significant. Statistical analyses were performed using the statistical software GraphPad Prism 7.0 (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) and R version 3.6.3 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).
Ethics approval
The study has been approved by the ethics committee of the medical council Hamburg and has therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.
Consent to participate
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Consent for publication
Patients signed informed consent regarding publishing their data and photographs.
Results
Study population
A total of 122 patients with documented scar-related VT were included into the study. The patients’ baseline parameters did not differ significantly (Table 1).
Procedural data
The procedural parameters were similar in both groups (see Table 2A). The median procedure duration was 201.5 (IQR 175.8-240.0) minutes in the UHD group and 180.0 (IQR 145.0-235.0) minutes in the conventional mapping group (P = 0.117). The median fluoroscopy duration (19.0 (IQR 15.2-26.0) minutes versus 22.9 (IQR 13.8-31.1) minutes) did not differ between groups (P = 0.481). The median radiofrequency duration was 1637 (871-2536) seconds in the UHD group and 1641 (IQR 1096-2333) seconds in the conventional mapping group (P = 0.763). 24.6% (15/61; UHD group) versus 27.9% (17/61; conventional mapping group) of patients had a previous VT ablation (P = 0.837).
A substrate map was created in all patients in both groups. A monomorphic VT was inducible in 82.0% (50/61) of patients in the UHD group (mean CL 350 ± 100 ms) and in 85.2% (52/61, P = 0.807) of patients in the conventional mapping group (mean CL 325 ± 110 ms). The mean number of inducible VTs was 2.1 ± 1.5 in the UHD group and 2.0 ± 1.0 in the conventional mapping group (P = 1.000). Two patients in the UHD group and no patients in the conventional mapping group presented with ongoing VT at the beginning of the procedure. 44.2% (23/52) of all VT in the UHD group and 48.1% (25/52) in the conventional mapping group were hemodynamically not or only shortly tolerated (P = 0.844). Activation mapping and/or entrainment mapping was performed in all patients with hemodynamically tolerated VT (47.5% (29/61) in the UHD group versus 44.3% (27/61) in the conventional mapping group; P = 0.856). Furthermore, pace mapping was performed in 50.8% (31/61) in the UHD group and in 90.2% (55/61) in the conventional mapping group (P = 0.001).
Acute procedural outcome
In patients with inducible VT, acute procedural success (non-inducibility of the clinical VT at the end of the procedure) was documented in 82.0% (41/50) in the UHD group versus 92.3% (48/52) in the conventional mapping group (P = 0.145).
Periprocedural complications occurred in five patients in the UHD group (two patients with hematoma of the groin not requiring intervention, two with aspiration pneumonia, one with pericardial tamponade) and five patients in the conventional mapping group (one patient with hematoma of the groin not requiring intervention, one with retroperitoneal hematoma, one with aspiration pneumonia, one with right bundle branch block, one with periprocedural stroke).
Long-term procedural outcome
The median follow-up time was 21.1 months (95% CI [17.8-∞]) in the UHD group and 56.2 months (95% CI [38.1-∞]) in the conventional mapping group (calculated by reverse Kaplan–Meier). The follow-up duration differed between groups because the ablation procedures of the conventional mapping group were performed prior to the procedures of the UHD group (see methods section). Sensitivity analyses censoring events occurring after the maximum follow-up time observed in the UHD group were performed (see Supplemental Fig. 1). The estimated 12-months cumulative incidence of recurrence or disease-related death was 41.0% (95% CI [28.5–53.1]; recurrence: n = 21; disease-related death n = 4) in the UHD group and 59.0% (95% CI [45.5–70.3]; recurrence: n = 26; disease-related death n = 10) in the conventional mapping group (see Table 2B). The 24-months estimate of the cumulative incidence was 52.4% (95% CI [36.9–65.7]; recurrence: n = 25 disease-related death: n = 4) in the UHD group and 69.6% (95% CI [55.9–79.8]; recurrence: n = 31; disease-related death n = 11) in the conventional mapping group (see Fig. 3). VT recurrence or death from any cause occurred after a median failure-free survival time of 15.8 months (95% CI [6.8–24.3]) after ablation in the UHD group and 5.1 months (95% CI [2.5–15.7]) in the conventional mapping group). A cause-specific Cox proportional hazards model showed that UHD mapping had an independent influence on the time to first recurrence or disease-related death with a HR of 0.623 (95% CI [0.390–0.995]; P = 0.048). Furthermore, an LV-EF > 30% in comparison to an LV-EF ≤ 30% demonstrated an independent effect: HR of 0.485 (95% CI [0.290–0.813]; P = 0.006; see Fig. 4). During follow-up, 13 patients in the UHD group and 14 patients in the conventional mapping group died. Death was classified as disease related in 6 patients of the UHD group and in 11 patients of the conventional mapping group.
The use of AAD at last follow-up was similar in both groups (see Table 2B). Cumulative incidence curves for recurrence or disease-related death stratified by type of cardiomyopathy and LV-EF are shown in Supplemental Figs. 2 and 3.
Discussion
The main findings of the present study are:
-
1.
Catheter ablation guided by UHD mapping is associated with fewer recurrences or disease-related deaths during the first 24 months after ablation in comparison to procedures guided by conventional point-by-point 3D-mapping using a 3.5 mm single tip catheter.
-
2.
The procedural duration and the radiation exposure did not differ between both mapping methods.
-
3.
Both methods did not differ with respect to periprocedural complications.
Substrate-based VT ablation approaches are dependent on correct delineation of myocardial scar and abnormal electrograms. Previous studies have shown an advantage of complete abolition of abnormal electrograms on the outcome of VT ablation6. UHD mapping creates a high spatial mapping density and may thus facilitate the depiction of those electrograms18,19. However, the impact of UHD mapping on ablation outcome remains under discussion. In the present study, patients who underwent ablation guided by UHD mapping had fewer recurrences or disease-related deaths during follow-up than patients with conventional mapping. Studies comparing novel mapping techniques with conventional point-by-point mapping during VT ablation are sparse and partly contradictory. The only randomized study (n = 20 patients) showed no difference in VT recurrences after 12 months post ablation20. Similarly, Cano et al. did not see a benefit in long-term outcome comparing multielectrode mapping and conventional mapping in an observational study analysing 81 patients21. In contrast, another observational study including 125 patients was able to identify mapping with multipolar catheters as a predictor for reduced recurrences besides image integration and success of abolition of all LAVA22.
The duration of radiofrequency energy application was similar in both of our patient groups and a larger ablated area is unlikely to be responsible for our observations. This finding goes in line with reports by Tschabrunn et al., showing that the ablation target area during UHD mapping is not bigger, but might even appear smaller. Hypothetically this is explained by remaining channels of healthy myocardium in heterogeneous tissue which are identified during UHD mapping and can be missed with larger sized electrode catheters19. An improved discrimination of far- and nearfield signal leads additionally to better discrimination during electrogram analysis as shown by Berte et al.23.
The aforementioned, rather unspecific approach of ablating all LAVA might sometimes be a necessary evil to prevent relevant areas from being missed during ablation, but it can come at the cost of excessive ablation and procedure times24. We showed in a previous study, that highly fractionated signals representing slowly conducting channels, detected by UHD mapping were often present at the critical VT isthmus site and represent a more specific target. Those signals were often confined to a small space and a high mapping density might be beneficial for detection. As 3.5 mm single tip electrode catheters were used for mapping in the conventional mapping group, it is possible that signals were sometimes missed due to the lower resolution, which might be one reason for a worse ablation outcome23. Still in general, detection of highly fractionated isthmus signals should be possible using modern single tip catheters, especially if they contain additional micro electrodes.
Another reason leading to better long-term outcome in patients treated using UHD mapping might be the shorter mapping time for creation of activation maps, facilitating the identification of critical parts of the reentry mechanism25. Mapping during ongoing VT was often not tolerated due to hemodynamic instability. Faster mapping using the mini-basket catheter might facilitate the completion of an activation map with the benefit of specific ablation at the critical isthmus site11,21.
Better LV function was another factor associated with reduced recurrence rates. This observation has been described before17. Besides better mapping conditions in patients with better hemodynamic status, the main reason for this finding might be less advanced underlying heart disease.
During the initial introduction of multipolar catheters, there were concerns about a higher thrombogenicity due to the more complex structure of the catheter. We aimed at an ACT > 300 s during mapping and ablation for all procedures in the UHD group. As the procedures in the conventional mapping group were performed before introduction of UHD mapping, the ACT goal was still > 250 s for those patients. Both groups had low complication rates, especially low rates of stroke (n = 1, conventional mapping group) and pericardial tamponade (n = 1, UHD group). Our data stand in line with several studies, showing good procedural safety for both mapping approaches26,27.
Limitations
While our study includes a relatively large number of patients in comparison to other studies available in the literature on this subject, the number of patients at risk might be too small for drawing conclusions for the follow-up beyond year two and later. Since the present study has a retrospective design and should thus be considered hypothesis generating, prospective, large, randomised studies are needed to confirm the benefits of UHD mapping guided VT ablation. Due to the retrospective design, inclusion bias can't be fully excluded and might have had an influence on our results. Although all procedures were conducted by operators with several years of experience in interventional electrophysiology, a learning curve effect is possible and might have influenced the outcome of the UHD mapping group which was treated later than the conventional mapping group. Even if AAD intake was reported during follow-up appointments. the exact duration of AAD intake and the patients’ compliance regarding medication is not known and might have influenced recurrence rates. Although the energy levels chosen for ablation were similar in both groups, the different models of ablation catheters used in the UHD and the conventional mapping group might have had an influence on the lesion quality and thus also on the ablation outcome.
Conclusion
VT ablation guided by UHD mapping was independently associated with an improved 24-months outcome in comparison to procedures with conventional point-by-point 3D-mapping. Both mapping techniques were safe, had similar procedure times, and similar radiation exposure.
Data availability
Data are available upon reasonable request.
References
Poole, J. E. et al. Prognostic importance of defibrillator shocks in patients with heart failure. N. Engl. J. Med. 359, 1009–1017 (2008).
Martens, P. et al. Sacubitril/valsartan reduces ventricular arrhythmias in parallel with left ventricular reverse remodeling in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Clin. Res. Cardiol. 108(10), 1074–1082 (2019).
Schupp, T. et al. Prognostic impact of potassium levels in patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Clin. Res. Cardiol. 109(10), 1292–1306 (2020).
Al-Khatib, S. M., Stevenson, W. G., Ackerman, M. J. et al. 2017 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for Management of Patients With Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. Heart Rhythm e73-e189 (2018).
Wasmer, K. et al. Clinical, procedural and long-term outcome of ischemic VT ablation in patients with previous anterior versus inferior myocardial infarction. Clin. Res. Cardiol. 109(10), 1282–1291 (2020).
Jaïs, P. et al. Elimination of local abnormal ventricular activities: a new end point for substrate modification in patients with scar-related ventricular tachycardia. Circulation 125, 2184–2196 (2012).
Di Biase, L. et al. Endo-epicardial homogenization of the scar versus limited substrate ablation for the treatment of electrical storms in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 60, 132–141 (2012).
Glashan, C. A. et al. Multisize electrodes for substrate identification in ischemic cardiomyopathy: validation by integration of whole heart histology. JACC Clin. Electrophysiol. 5, 1130–1140 (2019).
Takigawa, M. et al. Detailed analysis of the relation between bipolar electrode spacing and far- and near-field electrograms. JACC Clin. Electrophysiol. 5, 66–77 (2019).
Nührich, J. M. et al. Substrate characterization and catheter ablation in patients with scar-related ventricular tachycardia using ultra high-density 3-D mapping. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol. 28, 1058–1067 (2017).
Schwarzl, J. M. et al. Specific electrogram characteristics impact substrate ablation target area in patients with scar-related ventricular tachycardia: insights from automated ultra-high-density mapping. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol. 32(2), 376–388 (2020).
Anter, E., Tschabrunn, C. M., Contreras-Valdes, F. M., Li, J. & Josephson, M. E. Pulmonary vein isolation using the Rhythmia mapping system: verification of intracardiac signals using the Orion mini-basket catheter. Heart Rhythm 12, 1927–1934 (2015).
Viswanathan, K. et al. Evaluation of a novel high-resolution mapping system for catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias. Heart Rhythm 14, 176–183 (2017).
Sultan, A. et al. Necessity of epicardial ablation for ventricular tachycardia after sequential endocardial approach. Int. J. Cardiol. 182, 56–61 (2015).
Tsiachris, D. et al. Electroanatomical voltage and morphology characteristics in postinfarction patients undergoing ventricular tachycardia ablation: pragmatic approach favoring late potentials abolition. Circ. Arrhythm. Electrophysiol. 8, 863–873 (2015).
Ghanbari, H. et al. Noninducibility in postinfarction ventricular tachycardia as an end point for ventricular tachycardia ablation and its effects on outcomes: a meta-analysis. Circ. Arrhythm. Electrophysiol. 7, 677–683 (2014).
Vergara, P. et al. Predictive score for identifying survival and recurrence risk profiles in patients undergoing ventricular tachycardia ablation: the I-VT score. Circ. Arrhythm. Electrophysiol. 11(12), e006730 (2018).
Nayyar, S. et al. High-density mapping of ventricular scar: a comparison of ventricular tachycardia (VT) supporting channels with channels that do not support VT. Circ. Arrhythm. Electrophysiol. 7, 90–98 (2014).
Tschabrunn, C. M. et al. High-resolution mapping of ventricular scar: comparison between single and multi-electrode catheters. Circ. Arrhythm. Electrophysiol. 9(6), e003841 (2016).
Acosta, J. et al. Multielectrode versus point-by-point mapping for ventricular tachycardia substrate ablation: a randomized study. EP Europace 20, 512–519 (2018).
Cano, Ó. et al. Utility of high density multielectrode mapping during ablation of scar-related ventricular tachycardia. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol. 28, 1306–1315 (2017).
Yamashita, S. et al. Impact of new technologies and approaches for post-myocardial infarction ventricular tachycardia ablation during long-term follow-up. Circ. Arrhythm. Electrophysiol. 9(7), e003901 (2016).
Berte, B. et al. Impact of electrode type on mapping of scar-related VT. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol. 26, 1213–1223 (2015).
Sacher, F. et al. Substrate mapping and ablation for ventricular tachycardia: the LAVA approach. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol. 26, 464–471 (2015).
Ptaszek, L. M. et al. Rapid acquisition of high-resolution electroanatomical maps using a novel multielectrode mapping system. J. Interv Card. Electrophysiol. 36, 233–242 (2013).
Hindricks, G. et al. Acute safety, effectiveness, and real-world clinical usage of ultra-high density mapping for ablation of cardiac arrhythmias: results of the TRUE HD study. EP Europace 21, 655–661 (2019).
Mathew, S. et al. Complications and mortality after catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias: risk in VT ablation (RIVA) score. Clin. Res. Cardiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-021-01902-2 (2021).
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. P. Jaïs and F. Sacher were partly funded by IHU LIRYC ANR-10-IAHU-04.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed relevantly to the study, revised the manuscript critically and approved its submission. R.S. and C.M. are responsible for study design, data acquisition, analysis and drafting of the manuscript. J.M., M.N., P.M., L.D., C.J., M.L. contributed to data acquisition and interpretation. R.S., J.S., J.M., M.N., P.M., L.D., C.J., M.L., S.W., C.E., C.M. were involved in patient treatment. AH conducted data analysis and interpretation as well as statistical counselling. P.M., F.S., C.M., T.W., H.E., P.J., S.W., C.E. were involved in data analysis, interpretation, and critical revision of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
C. Meyer, S. Willems, P. Jaïs, F. Sacher, H. Estner, C. Martin report honoraria as consultants or speaker’s fees relevant to this topic. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Schleberger, R., Schwarzl, J.M., Moser, J. et al. The impact of ultra-high-density mapping on long-term outcome after catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia. Sci Rep 12, 9139 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-12918-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-12918-7
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.