Abstract
Genetic susceptibility for xerostomia, a common sequela of radiotherapy and chemoradiotherapy for head and neck cancer, is unknown. Therefore, to identify genetic variants associated with moderate to severe xerostomia, we conducted a GWAS of 359 long-term oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) survivors using 579,956 autosomal SNPs. Patient-reported cancer treatment-related xerostomia was assessed using the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory. Patient response was dichotomized as moderate to severe or none to mild symptoms. In our study, 39.2% of OPC survivors reported moderate to severe xerostomia. Our GWAS identified eight SNPs suggestively associated with higher risk of moderate to severe xerostomia in six genomic regions (2p13.3, rs6546481, Minor Allele (MA) = A, ANTXR1, P = 4.3 × 10–7; 5p13.2–p13.1, rs16903936, MA = G, EGFLAM, P = 5.1 × 10–6; 4q21.1, rs10518156, MA = G, SHROOM3, P = 7.1 × 10–6; 19q13.42, rs11882068, MA = G, NLRP9, P = 1.7 × 10–5; 12q24.33, rs4760542, MA = G, GLT1D1, P = 1.8 × 10–5; and 3q27.3, rs11714564, MA = G, RTP1, P = 2.9 × 10–5. Seven SNPs were associated with lower risk of moderate to severe xerostomia, of which only one mapped to specific genomic region (15q21.3, rs4776140, MA = G, LOC105370826, a ncRNA class RNA gene, P = 1.5 × 10–5). Although our small exploratory study did not reach genome-wide statistical significance, our study provides, for the first time, preliminary evidence of genetic susceptibility to xerostomia. Further studies are needed to elucidate the role of genetic susceptibility to xerostomia.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The incidence of oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) is increasing at a rate of about 5% each year in the United States—faster than any other head and neck cancer (HNC)—and according to current projections, OPC will represent about half of HNCs by 20301. This increased incidence of OPC is attributed to the contribution of the human papillomavirus (HPV) in the etiology of HNC1,2,3,4. Rates of HPV-associated OPC continue to rise rapidly in a younger, middle-aged population. Fortunately, conventional treatment for HPV-related OPC tumors, often including chemotherapy and/or radiation, is associated with excellent prognosis and decades of potential cancer-free life post-treatment1,2,3,4. Unfortunately, these patients are at risk of developing substantial cancer treatment-related side-effects, including xerostomia, which often have long-term detrimental impacts on quality of life1,2,3,4.
Xerostomia is a sensation of dryness in the mouth which, when occurring in HNC cancer patients, is often caused by salivary gland hypofunction secondary to radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy5,6. Radiation-associated xerostomia occurring during or immediately after radiotherapy is commonly referred to as acute xerostomia, which may be caused by salivary gland inflammation5,6,7. In contrast, late xerostomia can occur months after treatment completion and may be caused by fibrosis and damage to the salivary glands, which is often permanent5,6,7. Such radiotherapy-associated salivary gland injury can result in alterations in saliva including volume, pH, and consistency often leading to production of low quantity, high viscosity, and more acidic saliva with drastic impacts on patients’ overall oral health and quality of life6.
Despite efforts to prevent radiation-attributable salivary gland injury and resultant xerostomia, patient-reported xerostomia was rated in an earlier study as one of the 5 most prevalent and severely rated cancer treatment-associated symptoms among OPC survivors8. In a recent study of OPC patients, 39.1% of OPC survivors reported moderate-to-severe xerostomia which had associations with sex, education level, continued smoking, and bilateral intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) after multivariable adjustment9.
Radiation-attributable salivary gland hypofunction and resultant xerostomia often lead to a multifold of downstream negative oral health disorders and dysfunctions including dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), oral pain, voice and speech dysfunction, dysgeusia (change in taste), dental caries, osteoradionecrosis, and oral infections5,6,7,10. These conditions can in turn contribute to dietary alterations, inadequate nutrition secondary to reduced food consumption, loss in body weight, decline in engagement in social activities, increased morbidity, and a decline in quality of life, which is even more devastating given the current lack of effective treatment options for radiation-attributable salivary gland damage and resultant xerostomia10. Given lack of treatment options once these conditions develop, efforts need to be aimed at understanding patient risk for radiation-attributable salivary gland damage and xerostomia with high priority on prevention of these conditions.
Genetic susceptibility implicated in development of OPC and oral cancer (OC) were discovered in several loci, including alcohol-related genes (ADH1B and ADH7), and HLA region11,12,13. However, genetic susceptibility to xerostomia is not well understood. Inter-patient heterogeneity/variability to toxicity of normal tissues after radiotherapy contributing to xerostomia in HNC patients has led to postulations of potential genetic influence on the radiosensitivity of irradiated tissues14,15,16. Genes involved in inflammatory pathways, tumorigenesis, and detection and repair of DNA damage may lead to functional changes/consequences in downstream protein, potentially impairing the ability to repair DNA damage14,15,16. This could contribute to alteration of intrinsic radiosensitivity of irradiated tissues and subsequent radiotherapy-associated adverse effects including xerostomia17. It has been reported that DNA sequence variation/polymorphism in genes, including XRCC3 and ATM (responsible for DNA repair) and TGFβ1 (linked with fibrinogenesis/proliferation of fibroblasts), are correlated with radiotherapy-related hypersensitivity18,19,20.
To our knowledge no study has investigated genetic basis of xerostomia using a genome-wide study. The objective of this study was to identify genetic predictors of susceptibility to patient-reported cancer treatment-associated xerostomia among long-term OPC survivors using genome-wide association methods. We hypothesized that genetic variants are associated with cancer treatment-associated xerostomia. Identification of genetic variants associated with xerostomia would allow risk stratification as well as targeted efforts aimed at prevention, surveillance, and management.
Material and methods
Study population
This study population included OPC survivors treated from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2013, at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. Study participants were 18 years or older and responded to an OPC survivorship survey at least 1 year after curative OPC treatment completion. Exclusion criteria included the following: recurrent HNC, second primary tumors, and distant metastasis. Figure 1 shows the ascertainment/recruitment of the study population. Written informed consent was obtained from all study participants for collection of blood samples and clinic-demographic information and a consent statement was used on survey cover letter as written survey informed consent. The study protocols PA11-0936 and LAB00-062 were approved by the Institutional Review Board at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in accordance with tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki.
Primary outcome
Patient-reported cancer treatment-related xerostomia was the primary outcome variable in this study. The outcome variable was defined using the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory Head and Neck Cancer Module (MDASI-HN)21, a validated multi-symptom instrument that asked respondents: “How severe are your symptoms? People with cancer frequently have symptoms that are caused by their disease or their treatment21. We ask you to rate how severe the symptoms have been in the last 24 h.” Subsequently, respondents were asked to score the intensity of xerostomia experienced with “having dry mouth at its worst”. Response categories ranged from 0 (“not present”) to 10 (“as bad as you can imagine”)21. Patient response to the dry mouth question was then dichotomized to following categories: 0–4 were coded as none to mild, and 5–10 were coded as moderate to severe22,23. We dichotomized the xerostomia into clinically meaningful categories: moderate to severe versus none to mild.
Genotyping
The genotype data for OPC patients was obtained from our previous study which included patients with newly or recently diagnosed and previously untreated squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck24, ascertained at Head and Neck Surgery Clinic at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Texas25,26. The Illumina HumanOmniExpress-12v1 BeadChip was used for genotyping of the genomic DNA. Using the same quality control of the genotype data as previously described (inclusive of use of genotype data to identify participants with discordant sex classification, those who were genetically related, and those that were duplicates)24, we had genotype data on a total 579,956 autosomal SNPs.
Clinical and sociodemographic covariates
Information on demographic variables including age at OPC diagnosis, sex, and education level; clinical variables including primary tumor subsite, T and N staging, survival time, HPV status, cigarette smoking status at time of cancer diagnosis, and ability to eat a solid food diet prior to treatment; and treatment-related variables including treatment modality, receipt of chemotherapy, surgery, neck dissection, and radiotherapy dose, fractionation schedule, and type were abstracted from patients’ electronic medical charts. Primary head and neck tumor subsites included tonsil, base of tongue and glossopharyngeal sulcus, and others (including soft palate, pharyngeal wall, and oropharynx site not otherwise specified). T and N staging was according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer 7th edition criteria. Survival time was calculated as the difference between age at time of diagnosis and age at time of survey. Radiotherapy information included the following: total radiation dose to primary tumor measured in Gray (Gy); radiotherapy fractionation schedule including standard fractionation (70.0 Gy given in 33–35 fractions), accelerated fractionation (72.0 Gy given in 40 fractions or use of concomitant boost or Danish Head and Neck Cancer Group regimens), and no radiotherapy; and radiotherapy type. Radiotherapy types were categorized as three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT), bilateral IMRT with split-field or whole-field IMRT, volumetric-modulated arc therapy, and proton therapy; and ipsilateral IMRT regimens. Also, as parotid glands produce 60–65% of saliva27 and mean dose to parotid glands of ≤ 26 Gy can contribute to preserving salivary flow28. Therefore, we also abstracted information on mean dose to parotid glands from medical charts and, using the threshold dose, categorized mean parotid gland dose as follows; ≤ 26 Gy, > 26 Gy, and missing/don’t know. Cigarette smoking status was determined as follows: participants who had not smoked 100 cigarettes in their lifetime were classified as never smokers, those who had quit more than 6 months before diagnosis were considered former smokers at the time of diagnosis20,29,30 and finally, current smokers at the time of diagnosis were further categorized into those who quit subsequently and those who continued to smoke9,23.
Statistical methods
Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the study data and the Kruskal Wallis test and Fishers exact test were used to test for differences between xerostomia categories for continuous and categorical variables, respectively. In a larger study, we had found that sex, education, cigarette smoking, and radiotherapy type were significantly associated with xerostomia; therefore, we adjusted our genetic analyses with these covariates9 along with mean dose to parotid glands28. Quality control for genotype data in our study included: removing SNPs with Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE; P < 1 × 10–6), genotyping typing call rate ≤ 95%, and minor allele frequency ≤ 0.05 among OPC patients24. The pairwise genetic distance among the 359 OPC patients was estimated using identity-by-state (IBS) methods implemented in PLINK (v1.90b3.34 64-bit [15 Mar 2016])26. A clustering variable was created to identify genetically related/similar individuals to take into consideration underlying population substructure24. This clustering approach is a standard established approach for population stratification31. In particular, the complete linkage agglomerative clustering is used, based on pairwise IBS distance, with some restrictions, including no merged clusters that contain significantly different patients based on a pairwise population concordance test (P < 0.001), all pairs of patients containing at least one case and one control, and cluster size restrictions. The clustering variable created in this way represents the fine-scale population structure of the ancestry and was incorporated in the analysis as a covariate to adjust for the potential underlying population substructure.
Exact logistic regression analysis was conducted using an additive genetic model adjusting for covariates of sex, two-level education variable, three-level radiotherapy type variable, four-level cigarette smoking variable, and the genetic cluster variable described earlier. Odds ratios (ORs) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated. As a preliminary exploratory study with a small sample, our goals remained hypothesis generating and were focused on identification of genetic variants with potential associations with moderate to severe xerostomia. Accordingly, P < 1 × 10–5 was used as a criterion for selecting and reporting SNPs, as adjustment for multiple comparisons testing was not feasible. PLINK (v1.9/2.0, https://www.cog-genomics.org/plink/2.0/ v1.90b3.34 64-bit. https://www.cog-genomics.org/plink2 ) software was used for association analysis31, and Manhattan plots were constructed in R with custom function and the calibrate package. To further understand potential role and function of identified SNPs at mapped locations in relation to genes, function, and downstream effects, GeneCards (https://www.genecards.org/), dbSNP (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/snp/), NCBI Aceview (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/IEB/Research/Acembly/), and PubMed (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) were accessed and comprehensively searched. We also conducted the gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) using the extension to gene set enrichment analysis approach, GSEA-SNP32,33.
Additionally, we explored the cumulative contribution of SNPs to moderate to severe xerostomia. Specifically, we calculated polygenic score (PGS), which accounts for multiple statistically significant SNPs and assessed the association between PGS and risk of moderate to severe xerostomia. For k independent significant SNPs associated with risk of moderate to severe xerostomia, the PGS was calculated as \(PGS={\sum }_{i=1}^{k}{\beta }_{i}{N}_{i}\), where \({\beta }_{i}\) is the coefficient estimate of SNP i (i.e., log(ORi)) from a logistic regression analysis and \({N}_{i}\) is the number of minor alleles for SNP i. Two PGSs were created to take into consideration protective SNPs (i.e., OR < 1; less likely to develop moderate to severe xerostomia) and risk SNPs (i.e., OR ≥ 1; more likely to develop moderate to severe xerostomia), respectively. Finally, we estimated the heritability for xerostomia using the software tool genome-wide complex trait analysis (GCTA)34,35, with adjustment for the covariates (i.e., sex, education, RT type, mean parotid gland dose, population substructure cluster).
Results
Characteristics of the study populations
Table 1 summarizes the distribution of demographic, clinical, and treatment-related characteristics of this study population. Our study population included 359 patients with OPC, seven of whom did not respond to the MDASI-HN xerostomia question. Majority of OPC survivors in our study were male (85.8% = 308/359). Among the 352 patients who responded to the xerostomia question, 138 (39.2%) reported moderate to severe xerostomia and 214 (60.8%) reported none to mild xerostomia. There were no significant differences by age among xerostomia sub-groups. Higher proportions of female patients (27; 52.9%) and those with less than high school education (32; 54.2%) reported moderate to severe xerostomia, and these differences were statistically significant. Interestingly, most patients with moderate to severe xerostomia had T1 and T2 tumors (96; 69.6%), were never and former smokers (114; 82.6%), received standard radiotherapy fractionation (113; 81.9%), and were treated with IMRT (121; 87.7%) regimens. Median radiotherapy dose was significantly higher among patients with moderate to severe xerostomia than in patients with none to mild xerostomia (70.0 Gy vs. 66.0 Gy), and a significantly higher proportion of those who received 3D-CRT (17/28; 63.0%) reported moderate to severe xerostomia. Mean parotid gland dose was available for 243 patients and missing for 116 of them. Of these 243 patients, mean parotid gland dose was > 26 Gy for 96 (39.5%) patients of which 42 (43.8%) reported moderate to severe xerostomia. Among the patients with moderate to severe xerostomia, significantly higher proportion of those who received multimodality chemotherapy treatment (103; 43.1%) reported moderate to severe xerostomia in comparison to those treated with single modality regimens. The pairwise-IBS-distance-based clustering analysis resulted in 13 clusters. The frequencies and percentages of the clusters underlying population substructure were similar in patients with none to mild xerostomia and patients with moderate to severe xerostomia. This clustering variable was adjusted for in the analysis as a covariate. Lastly, using GCTA, we found the heritability of xerostomia to be 26%, given the prevalence of moderate to severe xerostomia of 39% observed in our data.
Association analysis
Table 2 lists the top 15 SNPs associated with moderate to severe xerostomia among OPC survivors in our study (P < 1 × 10–5). Among them eight SNPs were associated with increasing odds of reporting moderate to severe xerostomia; of which two did not match to any specific gene region. The remaining seven SNPs were associated with lower odds of reporting moderate to severe xerostomia; of which, six SNPs did not match to any specific gene region.
The leading top-ranked SNP in our study (rs6546481, OR 4.70, 95% CI 2.50–8.83, P = 4.3 × 10–7) was located on chromosome 2 and was mapped to the ANTXR1 (anthrax toxin receptor 1) gene. ANTXR1 has been previously associated with metastasis in head and neck cancer patients with nasopharyngeal tumors and other oral disorders38,39.
OPC survivors with at least one copy of minor allele G for rs16903936 were associated with higher odds of reporting moderate to severe xerostomia (OR 3.98, 95% CI 2.16–7.31, P = 5.1 × 10–6). This SNP was mapped to the EGFLAM (EGF Like, Fibronectin Type III and Laminin G Domains) gene which has been associated with ovarian cancer, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and Glioblastoma40.
Carriers of least one copy of minor allele G for rs10518156 were associated with higher odds of reporting moderate to severe xerostomia (OR 6.65, 95% CI 2.65–16.69, P = 7.1 × 10–6). This SNP was mapped to the SHROOM3 (shroom family member 3) gene, which has been associated with acute myeloid leukemia, neural tube defects, and atrial septal defects41.
Study participants with at least one copy of minor allele G for rs11882068 were associated with higher odds of reporting moderate to severe xerostomia (OR 3.53, 95% CI 1.96–6.37, P = 1.7 × 10–5). This SNP was mapped to the NLRP9 (NLR family pyrin domain containing 9) gene, which may play an important role in the innate immune system regulation and inflammation42.
Carriers of at least one copy of minor allele G for rs4760542 were associated with higher odds of reporting moderate to severe xerostomia (OR 2.94, 95% CI 1.80–4.80, P = 1.8 × 10–5). This SNP was mapped to the GLT1D1 (glycosyltransferase 1 domain containing 1) gene, which is postulated to be an oncogene for colorectal cancer and associated with hepatocellular carcinoma43.
Study participants with at least one copy of minor allele G for rs11714564 were associated with higher odds of reporting moderate to severe xerostomia (OR 3.05, 95% CI 1.80–5.17, P = 2.9 × 10–5). This SNP was mapped to the RTP1 (Receptor Transporter Protein 1) gene, which plays a role in binding of olfactory receptor genes which are involved in several cancers44.
Also, rs3014269 (OR 4.08, 95% CI 2.11–7.89, P = 2.1 × 10–5), and rs1158267 (OR 5.06, 95% CI 2.30–11.12, P = 3.5 × 10–5) were associated with increased odds but were not mapped to any specific gene region.
Among SNPs associated with lower odds of moderate to severe xerostomia, only one rs4776140 (OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.15–0.51, P = 1.5 × 10–5) was mapped to LOC105370826, a ncRNA class RNA gene45. Additionally, r rs746154 (OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.18–0.52, P = 8.0 × 10–6), rs1038553 (OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.14–0.50, P = 9.5 × 10–6), rs7523492 (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.28–0.64, P = 2.5 × 10–5), rs1486548 (OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.17–0.54, P = 2.7 × 10–5), rs10219117 (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.24–0.61, P = 3.1 × 10–5), and rs12565883 (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.24–0.61, P = 3.3 × 10–5) were all associated with lower odds but were not mapped to any specific gene region.
Furthermore, the analysis results using PGS to explore the top-ranked SNPs in a combinatorial manner were reported in Table 2. The PGS was calculated respectively for eight risk-associated SNPs and seven protectively-associated SNPs. We observed statistically significant associations between PGSs and likelihood of developing moderate to severe xerostomia. The PGS combining eight risk SNPs was associated with moderate to severe xerostomia with P = 3.4 × 10–8. Similarly, the PGS combining seven protective SNPs was also significantly associated with moderate to severe xerostomia with P = 1.6 × 10–8.
Supplementary Information Table S1 lists the top 100 SNPs (P < 1 × 10–4) associated with moderate to severe xerostomia among OPC survivors. Figure 2 shows the Manhattan plots of the GWAS association analysis with moderate to severe xerostomia in our study. We also conducted the GSEA analysis using the six genes identified based on the top-ranked SNPs associated with moderate to severe xerostomia (Table 2). In our GWAS data, a total of 295 SNPs mapping to these six genes were used to conduct pathway-driven analysis using an extension to the gene set enrichment analyses approach, GSEA-SNP. We used Molecular Signatures Database in combination with HP_XEROSTOMIA database36,37. The results for top 25 gene sets using the GSEA-SNP analysis are listed in the Supplementary Information Table S2. No significant enrichment for any gene set was observed.
As an additional assessment of role of genetics to the xerostomia phenotype, we also conducted GWAS analyses with two re-categorized xerostomia phenotypes. In particular, we first dichotomized the xerostomia as mild to severe (1–10) versus none (0), and then as moderate to severe (5–10) versus none (0). Sex, education, RT type, mean parotid gland dose and cluster variable for population substructure were adjusted for in both analyses. The top 50 SNPs associated with the two re-categorized xerostomia phenotypes are listed in Supplementary Information Tables S3 and S4, respectively.
Lastly, we also assessed the association between the 15 top-ranked SNPs and dysphagia, a symptom of difficulty in swallowing which is related to xerostomia. The patient response to dysphagia was dichotomized to two categories: none to mild (0–4) and moderate to severe (5–10). Sex, education, RT type and cluster variable for population substructure were adjusted for in the analysis. The results are reported in Supplementary Information Table S5. The top significant SNP associated with dysphagia was rs1158267 (OR 3.31, 95% CI 1.70–6.46, P = 9.4 × 10–4).
Discussion
Xerostomia is a common complication/sequela of HNC treatment often resulting in functional impairment and debilitating morbidity. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to conduct a genome-wide association analysis to identify genetic variants associated with risk of moderate to severe patient-reported xerostomia among OPC survivors. In this small exploratory GWAS study, we identified 15 SNPs with potential associations with moderate to severe xerostomia; seven of the SNPs belong to specific genomic regions (2p13.3, 3q27.3, 4q21.1, 5p13.2–p13.1, 12q24.33, 15q21.3, 19q13.42). Of the 15 variants, 8 were associated with higher risk, and 7 were associated with lowering risk of moderate to severe xerostomia. The most prominent findings in our study included potential associations of ANTXR1, RTP1, GLT1D1, NLRP9, and EGFLAM genes with xerostomia. Although our small sample study did not reach the genome-wide statistical significance (5.0 × 10–8), our study provides preliminary evidence of genetic basis for xerostomia which needs to be validated in independent studies.
The top test-wise significant finding of this study was that OPC survivors with at least one allelic variant A in SNP rs6546481 or at least one variant allele G in SNP rs4854546 mapped to the ANTXR1 gene had an increased risk of reporting moderate to severe xerostomia. ANTXR1 is a protein coding gene possibly involved in cellular attachment and migration38. Furthermore, ANTXR1 has also been associated with genome RNAi human phenotypes with a potential role in HPV16 infection38. Interestingly, this gene is also known to be associated with oral disorders such as oropharyngeal anthrax, which may result in oral mucosal infection, and gingival hypertrophy with gingival enlargement potentially due to inflammatory mechanisms, pharmaceutical treatment, and systemic conditions38. Therefore, ANTXR1 may also have a critical role in risk of developing xerostomia. However, independent validation and subsequent functional studies are needed to elucidate role of the genetic variants identified in our study.
Our study also reported that NLRP9 was potentially associated with increased risk of reporting moderate to severe xerostomia. Prior studies have linked NLRP9 to urothelial carcinoma46. More importantly the NLRP9 gene encodes a protein that can potentially regulate the innate immune system and may play a vital role in inflammatory response46. NLRP9, along with other genes including PYCARD and CASP1, is involved in the formation of inflammasome for activation with subsequent cytokine release to trigger or mediate the inflammatory response42. It is important to note that inflammation is postulated to contribute to acute xerostomia during and immediately after HNC treatment5,6, and our findings of a potential association between NLRP9 and xerostomia may provide some evidence to support this hypothesis.
RTP1 was associated with increased risk of reporting moderate to severe xerostomia. It is a protein coding gene involved in expression of bitter taste receptors in the circumvallate papillae of the tongue47. This gene plays a role in binding of olfactory receptors44 which may play a role in tumorigenesis with development and progression of melanoma48, invasive breast cancer49, and endometrial cancer50. Olfactory receptors may also be a potential biomarker for patient outcomes and tumor cell proliferation in prostate cancer48.
GLT1D1 was also associated with higher risk of reporting moderate to severe xerostomia. GLT1D1 is a protein coding gene involved in transferase activity including transfer of glycosyl groups43. GenomeRNAi phenotypes for this gene include HPV16 pseudovirus infection51. Liu et al. recently reported that GLT1D1 was involved in programmed cell death and was identified as a biomarker predictive of poor prognosis among patients with B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma52.
EGFLAM, a protein coding gene which plays a role in matrix assembly and cell adhesiveness was associated with higher risk of reporting moderate to severe xerostomia. It is considered a biomarker in some cancers including a hypomethylated tumor maker in ovarian cancer53 and with altered expression in non-Hodgkin lymphoma54. Importantly, expression of this gene correlates with cell proliferation, migration, invasion, and poor prognosis by activating the P13/AKT pathway in Glioblastoma55.
Another gene, SHROOM3, was suggestively associated with an increased risk of moderate to severe xerostomia. SHROOM3 is a protein coding gene that may play a role in the regulation of cell shape changes in some tissues and binding of actin, proteins, and beta-catenins and actin filament and ligand-gated sodium channel activity41. This gene is known to be associated with several disorders including acute myeloid leukemia41. Furthermore, a previous study reported that SHROOM3 was associated with chronic kidney disease with high levels of oxidatively damaged DNA and genomic instability56. Finally, several additional SNPs were suggestive of risk lowering or risk enhancing for xerostomia, although, they did not map to any gene or function except one which was linked with a ncRNA class RNA gene.
Limitations of our study include the small sample size and associated low power; thus, the study must be considered as preliminary and exploratory. Consequently, none of the genetic variants reached the genome-wide significance level of 5.0 × 10–8. Larger genomic studies and subsequent functional studies are needed to independently validate our findings. Furthermore, information on baseline xerostomia was not available in our study and data on mean parotid gland dose was not available for all patients.
In conclusion, our novel albeit preliminary exploratory study identified 15 genetic variants suggestively associated with moderate to severe xerostomia among OPC survivors, suggesting multifactorial genetic etiology of the dry mouth symptoms. Studies to further elucidate the role of genetic susceptibility to xerostomia can inform the development of risk stratification and clinical interventions for targeted prevention, surveillance and management to alleviate the devastating impact of xerostomia and improve quality of life in OPC survivors.
Data availability
Genomewide genotyping data have been deposited in dbGaP (Study Accession number phs001173.v1.p1).
References
Chaturvedi, A. K. et al. Human papillomavirus and rising oropharyngeal cancer incidence in the United States. J. Clin. Oncol. 29, 4294–4301 (2011).
Ang, K. K. et al. Human papillomavirus and survival of patients with oropharyngeal cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 363, 24–35 (2010).
Ritchie, J. M. et al. Human papillomavirus infection as a prognostic factor in carcinomas of the oral cavity and oropharynx. Int. J. Cancer. 104, 336–344 (2003).
Hafkamp, H. C. et al. Marked differences in survival rate between smokers and nonsmokers with HPV 16–associated tonsillar carcinomas. Int. J. Cancer. 122, 2656–2664 (2008).
Galloway, T., & Amdur, R. J. Management of late complications of head and neck cancer and its treatment. UpToDate. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/management-of-late-complications-of-head-and-neck-cancer-and-its-treatment (2020).
Dirix, P., Nuyts, S. & Van den Bogaert, W. Radiation-induced xerostomia in patients with head and neck cancer. Cancer 107, 2525–2534 (2006).
Braam, P. et al. Long-term parotid gland function after radiotherapy. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 62, 659–664 (2005).
Aggarwal, P. et al. Symptom burden associated with late lower cranial neuropathy in long-term oropharyngeal cancer survivors. JAMA Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 144, 1066–1076 (2018).
Aggarwal, P. et al. Determinants of patient-reported xerostomia among long-term oropharyngeal cancer survivors. Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.33849 (2021).
Nascimento, M. L. et al. Impact of xerostomia on the quality of life of patients submitted to head and neck radiotherapy. Med. Oral Patol. Oral Circ. Bucal. 24, e770–e775 (2019).
Hashibe, M. et al. Multiple ADH genes are associated with upper aerodigestive cancers. Nat. Genet. 40(6), 707–709 (2008).
McKay, J. D. et al. A genome-wide association study of upper aerodigestive tract cancers conducted within the INHANCE consortium. PLoS Genet. 7(3), e1001333 (2011).
Lesseur, C. et al. Genome-wide association analyses identify new susceptibility loci for oral cavity and pharyngeal cancer. Nat. Genet. 48(12), 1544–1550 (2016).
Fernet, M. & Hall, J. Genetic biomarkers of therapeutic radiation sensitivity. DNA Repair (Amst). 3, 1237–1243 (2004).
Hennequin, C., Quero, L. & Favaudon, V. Determinants and predictive factors of tumour radiosensitivity. Cancer Radiother. 12, 3–13 (2008).
Alsner, J., Andreassen, C. N. & Overgaard, J. Genetic markers for prediction of normal tissue toxicity after radiotherapy. Semin. Radiat. Oncol. 18, 126–135 (2008).
Wilding, C. S. et al. Influence of polymorphisms at loci encoding DNA repair proteins on cancer susceptibility and G2 chromosomal radiosensitivity. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 48, 48–57 (2007).
Mangoni, M. et al. Association between genetic polymorphisms in the XRCC1, XRCC3, XPD, GSTM1, GSTT1, MSH2, MLH1, MSH3, and MGMT genes and radiosensitivity in breast cancer patients. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 81, 52–58 (2011).
Zhang, L. et al. ATM polymorphisms are associated with risk of radiation-induced pneumonitis. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 77, 1360–1368 (2010).
Price, E. A. et al. Rare microsatellite polymorphisms in the DNA repair genes XRCC1, XRCC3 and XRCC5 associated with cancer in patients of varying radiosensitivity. Somat. Cell Mol. Genet. 23, 237–247 (1997).
MD Anderson Cancer Center. User guide. https://www.mdanderson.org/documents/Departments-and Divisions/Symptom-Research/MDASI_userguide.pdf. Version 1 - last updated November 19, 2009. Accessed 12/12/20
Wang, X. S. et al. Prevalence and characteristics of moderate to severe fatigue: A multicenter study in cancer patients and survivors. Cancer 120, 425–432 (2014).
Aggarwal P, Hutcheson KA, Garden AS, et al. Risk factors associated with patient-reported voice and speech symptoms among long-term oropharyngeal cancer survivors. JAMA Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg.
Shete, S. et al. A genome-wide association study identifies two novel susceptible regions for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Cancer Res. 80, 2451–2460 (2020).
Neumann, A. S. et al. Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase polymorphisms and risk of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: A case–control analysis. Int. J .Cancer. 115, 131–136 (2005).
Li, G. et al. Association of a p73 exon 2 G4C14-to-A4T14 polymorphisms with risk of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Carcinogenesis 25, 1911–1916 (2004).
Cooper, J. S., Fu, K., Marks, J. & Silverman, S. Late effects of radiation therapy in the head and neck region. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 31, 1141–1164 (1995).
Eisbruch, A., Ten Haken, R. K., Kim, H. M., Marsh, L. H. & Ship, J. A. Dose, volume, and function relationships in parotid salivary glands following conformal and intensity-modulated irradiation of head and neck cancer. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 45(3), 577–587 (1999).
Pan, X.B., Liu, Y., Huang, S.T., Chen, K.H., Jiang, Y.M., & Zhu, X.D. Predictors for improvement of xerostomia in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients receiving intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Medicine (Baltimore). 98, e17030 (2019).
Dijkema, T. et al. Parotid gland function after radiotherapy: The combined Michigan and Utrecht experience. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 78, 449–453 (2010).
Purcell, S., & Chang, C. PLINK v1.90b3.34 64-bit. https://www.cog-genomics.org/plink2 (2016).
Holden, M., Deng, S., Wojnowski, L. & Kulle, B. GSEA-SNP: Applying gene set enrichment analysis to SNP data from genome-wide association studies. Bioinformatics 24, 2784–2785 (2008).
Subramanian, A. et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: A knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 102(43), 15545–15550 (2005).
Yang, J. et al. Genetic variance estimation with imputed variants finds negligible missing heritability for human height and body mass index. Nat. Genet. 47, 1114–1120 (2015).
Yang, J., Lee, S. H., Goddard, M. E. & Visscher, P. M. GCTA: A tool for genome-wide complex trait analysis. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 88(1), 76–82 (2011).
Liberzon, A. et al. The Molecular Signatures Database (MSigDB) hallmark gene set collection. Cell Syst. 1(6), 417–425 (2015).
Gene Set: HP_XEROSTOMIA. http://www.gsea-msigdb.org/gsea/msigdb/geneset_page.jsp?geneSetName=HP_XEROSTOMIA&keywords=xerostomia
GeneCards: the human gene database. ANTXR1. https://www.genecards.org/cgi-bin/carddisp.pl?gene=ANTXR1&keywords=ANTXR1
Chen, S., et al. EGFR-PKM2 signaling promotes the metastatic potential of nasopharyngeal carcinoma through induction of FOSL1 and ANTXR2 [published correction appears in Carcinogenesis. 41, 863–864 (2020)]. Carcinogenesis. 41, 723–733 (2020).
https://www.genecards.org/cgi-bin/carddisp.pl?gene=EGFLAM&keywords=EGFLAM
GeneCards: The human gene database. SHROOM3. https://www.genecards.org/cgi-bin/carddisp.pl?gene=SHROOM3&keywords=SHROOM3.
GeneCards: The human gene database. NLRP9. https://www.genecards.org/cgi-bin/carddisp.pl?gene=NLRP9&keywords=NLRP9#summaries.
GeneCards: The human gene database. GLT1D1. https://www.genecards.org/cgi-bin/carddisp.pl?gene=GLT1D1&keywords=GLT1D1.
https://www.genecards.org/cgi-bin/carddisp.pl?gene=RTP1&keywords=RTP1.
https://www.genecards.org/cgi-bin/carddisp.pl?gene=LOC105370826&keywords=LOC105370826.
Poli, G. et al. Expression of inflammasome-related genes in bladder cancer and their association with cytokeratin 20 messenger RNA. Urol. Oncol. 33(505), e1-505.e7 (2015).
Behrens, M. et al. Members of RTP and REEP gene families influence functional bitter taste receptor expression. J. Biol. Chem. 281(29), 20650–20659 (2006).
Ranzani, M., Iyer, V., Ibarra-Soria, X., et al. Revisiting olfactory receptors as putative drivers of cancer. Wellcome Open Res. 2017; 2:9. Published 2017 Feb 10.
Masjedi, S., Zwiebel, L. J. & Giorgio, T. D. Olfactory receptor gene abundance in invasive breast carcinoma. Sci. Rep. 9, 13736 (2019).
Shibel, R. et al. The olfactory receptor gene product, OR5H2, modulates endometrial cancer cells proliferation via interaction with the IGF1 signaling pathway. Cells. 10(6), 1483 (2021).
Lipovsky, A. et al. Genome-wide siRNA screen identifies the retromer as a cellular entry factor for human papillomavirus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110, 7452–7457 (2013).
Liu, X. et al. Overexpression of GLT1D1 induces immunosuppression through glycosylation of PD-L1 and predicts poor prognosis in B-cell lymphoma. Mol. Oncol. 14, 1028–1044 (2020).
Gu, X. H., Lu, Y., Ma, D., Liu, X. S. & Guo, S. W. Model of aberrant DNA methylation patterns and its applications in epithelial ovarian cancer. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi 44, 754–759 (2009).
Li, M. et al. Characterization of hepatitis B virus infection and viral DNA integration in non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Int. J. Cancer. 147(8), 2199–2209 (2020).
Chen, J., Zhang, J., Hong, L. & Zhou, Y. EGFLAM correlates with cell proliferation, migration, invasion, and poor prognosis in glioblastoma. Cancer Biomark. 24(3), 343–350 (2019).
Corredor, Z. et al. Loci associated with genomic damage levels in chronic kidney disease patients and controls. Mutat. Res. 852, 503167 (2020).
Acknowledgements
Editorial support was provided by Bryan Tutt in Editing Services, Research Medical Library, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center.
Funding
This study was supported by the National Cancer Institute 5P30CA016672 (SS), a Cancer Prevention Fellowship supported by the Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas (CPRIT) Grant award, RP170259 (to PA; PI: S. Chang and S. Shete), and the Betty B. Marcus Chair in Cancer Prevention (SS). This study also was supported in part by a grant from the National Institutes of Health (R01CA236859) to Guojun Li. The OPC Survivorship Survey data collection was supported by the Charles and Daneen Stiefel Oropharynx Fund. This study was also supported by the Alvin R. Tarlov & John E. Ware Jr. Post-Doctoral Award in Patient Reported Outcomes for 2020–2021 to Puja Aggarwal.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
P.A.: Substantial contributions to the study conception or design; data management, supervised analysis, and interpretation; drafting manuscript, manuscript revisions; and contributions to the final version of the manuscript. K.A.H.: Responsible for data collection, project integrity, data collection infrastructure, programmatic oversight, direct oversight of classified personnel, substantial contributions to the study conception or design or the acquisition; interpretation of data; critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content, and contributions to the final version of the manuscript. R.Y., J.W., C.D.F., A.S.G., R.P.G., J.R., F.E.M., C.L., S.Y.L., G.B.G., M.S.C., G.L., C.-C.W., E.Y.H., E.M.S.: Clinical data interpretation and analytic support; substantial contributions to, critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content, and contributions to the final version of the manuscript. S.S.: Concept and design, interpretation of data, initial draft of the manuscript, study supervision, critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content, and contributions to the final version of the manuscript. All authors agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work were appropriately investigated and resolved.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Aggarwal, P., Hutcheson, K.A., Yu, R. et al. Genetic susceptibility to patient-reported xerostomia among long-term oropharyngeal cancer survivors. Sci Rep 12, 6662 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-10538-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-10538-9
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.