Abstract
Following corneal transplantation, there is an initial, rapid decline in corneal endothelial cells (CECs) following surgery. Direct imaging of post-transplantation endothelial cells is only possible weeks after surgery and with a limited field of view. We have developed a labelling approach using 1,1′-dioctadecyl-3,3,3′,3′-tetramethylindotricarbocyanine iodide (DIR) dye solution, that enables tracking of labelled CECs in vivo for at least 1 month. Initial in vitro optimization, with assessments of dye concentration on fluorescence, cellular toxicity and cell migration, performed in propagated primary CECs. Subsequently, in vivo evaluation of cellular labelling was assessed within a rabbit wound healing model. Finally, real-time visualization of human cadaver donor tissue incubated in DIR transplanted into rabbits was achieved using a clinical confocal microscope. Results revealed detectable fluorescence increased with concentration to a plateau of 100 µg/ml, with no toxicity of CECs at any concentration evaluated. DIR-labelled CECs were detectable in vivo up to 1 month, and transplanted labelled donor graft could be visualized and were trackable in vivo. Acute endothelial rejection in 1 rabbit was evidenced by detectable DIR positive cells within the anterior chamber. DIR imaging allowed for detailed imaging of the transplanted human corneal endothelium, and enabled non-invasive observation of the corneal endothelial morphology following transplantation.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
After corneal transplantation, a rapid decline in corneal endothelial cell density (ECD) is observed in the early post-operative period1,2. We have previously shown that iatrogenic cell loss occurs during the preparation3, storage4, insertion and unfolding of endothelial grafts5. In addition, factors such as air tamponade6,7, post-operative inflammation and co-morbidities such as glaucoma8,9, are likely to affect early endothelial cell loss. Immediately after transplantation, areas of dead or denuded endothelial cells are present5. A process of cell migration and restoration of the endothelial monolayer must be completed in order for corneal clarity and thickness to be restored10.
Monitoring of endothelial cells can either be performed directly, by imaging the cells10, or indirectly, by using measurements of endothelial function: central corneal thickness (CCT) and transparency11. Presently, endothelial cells are imaged in vivo in the clinical setting using specular or confocal microscopy12, although newer modalities, based on optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging, are being developed13. Typically, only a small number of cells, between 30 to 100, are imaged at high magnification14. Image quality can be poor following endothelial keratoplasty (EK), especially with non-contact methods15. Poor image acquisition from off-axis portions of the cornea, and the lack of automated methods for stitching multiple images together, mean these methods do not allow for global assessment of the entire graft16. Consequently, tracking small areas of interest over time can be very difficult17. In both specular and confocal microscopy, image quality is reliant on a clear corneal stroma, meaning images obtained through oedematous or scarred corneas are often of poor quality. The presence of an intra-cameral gas bubble can also impact image quality. As such, it is often not possible to use these methods in the first 2 weeks following EK, nor is it possible to use these methods to examine endothelial healing following wounding studies, which result in significant swelling of the cornea5.
Wounding studies are commonly used to assess the efficacy of surgical/pharmaceutical interventions aimed at promoting endothelial healing15,16,17. In our previous studies, in vivo endothelial wound healing was assessed using repeated intracameral trypan blue injection10. Whilst this was a reliable and reproducible technique, it is an invasive procedure that carries the risk of damaging healing endothelial cells or introducing infections18. The method cannot be used in the early post-operative periods following EK or Descemet’s membrane transplantation, whilst an intracameral gas bubble remains. Caution needs to be taken early after bubble resolution to avoid dislodging the recently transplanted material. An additional limitation of the trypan blue technique is that it only allowed global imaging of endothelial wound healing. This meant animals had to be sacrificed at staggered time intervals in order to perform histological evaluation of wound healing at a cellular level.
We previously developed and validated a method to image endothelial cells, in vivo, using Calcein AM; a green-fluorescent viability stain5. Whilst capable of global and cell-level imaging in the immediate post-operative period, our in vitro experiments showed that Calcein AM was rapidly cleared from endothelial cells indicating that any useful fluorescence signal will be extinguished by 24 h post-incubation. As such, it is not useful for longer-term tracking of endothelial cells in vivo. The fate of the transplanted cells can only truly be determined if methods to quantify transplanted corneal endothelial cell death immediately post-operatively can be combined with techniques to track endothelial cells through early post-operative phase, which we define as 1 month based on previous reports19,20.
In this study, we describe a technique for labelling and tracking corneal endothelial cells in vivo, both globally across the entire cornea and at an individual cell level. We compared these in vivo images to immuno-histology following animal sacrifice. We show this technique is suitable for tracking both native and transplanted endothelial cells and can be used in wound healing studies as well as xenotransplantation of human EK grafts into rabbits.
Results
Optimizing DIR concentration in vitro
Average DIR fluorescence increased with concentration in a linear-quadratic fashion. Comparison of average fluorescence levels at different doses, derived from macroscopic images taken from individual wells, revealed a significant difference between cells stained with 50 µg/ml and 100 µg/ml (repeated measures ANOVA, corrected p < 0.0001, N = 15 per group) but not between 100 and 200 µg/ml (p = 0.78) (Fig. 1a). Based on these findings a dose of 100 µg/ml was chosen for in vitro subsequent labelling. No significant differences were found on Calcein AM/ethidium homodimer toxicity assessment between DIR at any concentration and matched controls from the same donor (N = 6) (Fig. 1b). Wound healing kinetics following standardized scratch wounding in HCEC’s were similar between control and treated groups (Fig. 2). There was no significant difference in wound area remaining at any time point (n = 6, paired t-test) (Fig. 2d).
In vivo labelling of rabbit endothelial cells
Direct injection of DIR diluted in the rabbit aqueous to a final concentration of 100 µm/ml was successful in labelling rabbit endothelial cells. No adverse effects were observed following DIR injection, with no significant inflammation (conjunctival hyperemia, iris vascular dilation, anterior chamber cellular activity) seen at any time point. Slit lamp microscopy and infra-red imaging on day 1 showed no change in corneal clarity (Fig. 3a). DIR stained endothelial cells were visible on infra-red imaging, with significant cell-to-cell variation in staining intensity observed (Fig. 3b). There was no increase in corneal thickness (Fig. 3c,f) at any time point after surgery, with CCT remaining < 400 µm throughout the observation period. At day 28, all corneas remained clear (Fig. 3d). DIR labelled cells were still visible, but with some reduction in observable fluorescence (Fig. 3e). DIR uptake was prominent in the iris, meaning that pupil dilation was necessary to reduce background fluorescence in subsequent examinations. Background fluorescence was further reduced by imaging using the higher magnification lenses, as these reduced the depth of focus (Fig. 3e).
In vivo corneal wounding: comparison between in vivo DIR imaging, confocal microscopy and immunohistology
DIR staining was compared to conventional confocal microscopy and post-sacrifice immunohistology in 6 rabbits (2 sacrificed at day 3, 2 at day 5 and 2 at day 28 post wounding). By using additional magnifying lenses attached to the HRA/Spectralis, it was possible to image individual DIR stained endothelial cells, although significant variability in the fluorescence of adjacent endothelial cells was observed (Fig. 4). During early wound healing (day 3), elongated, migrating endothelial cells were seen (Fig. 4a). This same morphology was observed on immunofluorescence staining performed after sacrifice of the same animal (Fig. 4d). At this stage, no endothelial imaging was possible with conventional confocal microscopy (Fig. 4g). There was no difference in cell circularity measured from DIR and immunofluorescence images, with an average value of 0.51 ± 0.14 for histology derived circularity and 0.58 ± 0.12 for DIR imaging (t-test, p = 0.34). After wound closure, a confluent monolayer of cells with broad cell borders was seen with in vivo DIR imaging (Fig. 4b). This corresponded to confluent cells with incomplete tight junction formation, as assessed by ZO-1 immunofluorescence staining (Fig. 4e). Conventional confocal imaging was still unable to produce useful images, largely because applanation of the cornea resulted in undulations of the posterior corneal surface (Fig. 4h). After initial wound closure, continuing maturation of central endothelial cells was observed. As time progressed, cell borders became narrower and cells became more circular (Fig. 4c). The regular endothelial mosaic observed with DIR staining at day 28 corresponded to small, largely hexagonal cells, with a continuous ring of ZO-1 staining seen on immunofluorescence (Fig. 4f). Conventional in-vivo confocal images could be obtained from day 14 onward as seen at day 28 (Fig. 4i). Analysis at day 28 showed no difference in cell circularity (0.71 vs 0.74, t-test, p = 0.87) or the number of hexagonal cells as assessed by histology and DIR imaging. (50.9% (histology) vs 49.1% (HRA/Spectralis), chi-squared, p = 0.9).
In vivo corneal wounding: comparison between in vivo DIR imaging and trypan blue staining
Good agreement was seen between macroscopic, non-invasive DIR imaging and intracameral trypan blue staining, both at the time of wound creation (Fig. 5a,b) and at day 3 after wounding (Fig. 5c,d). Importantly, it was possible to acquire these images through corneas that were thickened or irregular in shape, as observed on the simultaneously acquired OCT (Fig. 5e). Bland–Altman plots were produced to compare the area and circularity of wounds (Fig. 6). Good agreement was seen between both methods, with less than 2% difference in area seen in any sample (Fig. 6a). Circularity was within 4% for all samples (Fig. 6b).
In vivo tracking of migrating endothelial cells following endothelial wounding in the rabbit
The wounding of the rabbit corneal endothelium in vivo was followed for 14 days using infra-red (Fig. 7a–d), OCT (Fig. 7e–h), and DIR imaging (Fig. 7i–l) with their respective magnified region (Fig. 7m–p). Complete closure of an 8 mm endothelial scrape wound occurred by day 5 (Fig. 7k–o). CCT (as assessed by OCT) returned to pre-wound levels by day 14 in all cases (Fig. 7h). These findings are in keeping with our previously published results10 obtained from scrape wounding in unstained corneas. Taken together, these findings suggest that DIR staining does not have a deleterious impact on endothelial healing or migration in vivo.
Labelling of ex vivo human corneas
Double staining using Calcein AM and DIR allowed multiplexed image acquisition of donor human corneas within the donor viewing chamber (Fig. 8a,b), as well as immediately post operatively inside the rabbit eye (Fig. 8c,d). Initially, staining with DIR showed large degrees of variation, with adjacent areas of the corneal endothelium showing markedly different degrees of fluorescence (Fig. 8b,d, yellow arrows). Calcein AM staining was able to detect large areas of cell loss (Fig. 8c, blue arrow) and differentiate between living and dead individual cells and cells clusters, when a magnifying objective lens was attached to the imaging set-up (Fig. 8e, red arrow). DIR staining was not able to differentiate between living cells and dead endothelial cells that remained attached to DM (DIR +’ve/Calcein am −‘ve) (Fig. 8d,f). As predicted by our in vitro assessment5, Calcein AM fluorescence diminished quickly, and no useful fluorescent images could be obtained at 24 h post-implantation (Fig. 8g). Conversely, DIR fluorescence tended to become more uniform by 24 h post graft insertion. At 24 h post implantation, macroscopic areas devoid of cells could be seen, and corresponded to the areas of cell death seen immediately following transplantation using Calein AM (Fig. 8h, blue arrow c.f. Calcein AM Fig. 8c). This suggests that non-vial endothelial cell have been ejected from the transplant by this stage.
Tracking transplanted human endothelial cells in vivo
Human EK grafts labelled with DIR were implanted into the rabbit anterior chamber. Stained endothelial cells within the graft maintained strong fluorescence for the entire study period. DIR images of the graft were taken at the pre-implantation (Fig. 9a) and post-implantation (Fig. 9b), and at intervals from day 1 to day 28 (Fig. 9c–e) in conjunction with infra-red (Fig. 9f–j), and OCT (Fig. 9k–o). The yellow bordered figures (Fig. 9p–q) is the magnified area denoted by the yellow arrows (Fig. 9a,b,d,e), whereas the blue bordered figures (Fig. 9r,s) is the magnified area denoted by the blue arrows (Fig. 9c–e). At day 1 post implantation, areas of bare DM devoid of endothelial cells were visible (Fig. 9c; red arrows). A triangular orientation mark (yellow arrow) used to confirm the correct position was also clearly visible. Over the first week, cells migrated to cover the areas of the bare DM (Fig. 9c; red arrows). Areas of cell migration from the donor to host could be seen on DIR imaging. In the case illustrated, this resulted in loss of the straight edge of the triangular orientation mark (yellow arrows). Following animal sacrifice, endothelial cells were stained with anti-human nuclear antibodies (Fig. 9q,s, FITC channel). Migration of human endothelial cells (stained green) across the graft border was visible (Fig. 9q) and the pattern of donor cell distribution showed good concordance between DIR imaging and immunohistological assessment (Fig. 9p,q). Transfer of fluorescence to neighboring rabbit endothelial cells was not observed. Areas of rabbit endothelial migration onto the host DM were seen in DMEK cases (Fig. 9p,r) but not in DSAEK. These cells were distinguishable, by the lack of staining with both DIR (Fig. 9p,r) and anti-human nuclear antibodies (Fig. 9q,s).
In one animal that had DMEK, clinical features of rejection (corneal oedema, ciliary injection) was observed at day 28 (Fig. 10). Compared to day 21 images (Fig. 10a,b), DIR imaging showed central loss of fluorescence at lower magnification (Fig. 10c) and patchy attachment of small, circular endothelial cells at higher powers (Fig. 10d). This was associated with the onset of circulating, DIR positive, cells in the anterior chamber (Video S1). An anterior chamber tap confirmed the presence of cellular material, but the yield was too low to confirm cell origin or DIR positivity using FACS/immunofluorescence.
High resolution cell imaging
By attaching the Rostock module (Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany) to the HRA/Spectralis, we were able to acquire detailed, high-resolution in vivo images. This allowed us to observe subtle biological processes at a cellular level, including nuclear fragmentation and cell detachment in both rabbit (Fig. 11a,b) and human (Fig. 11c) corneal endothelium; podocyte extension from neighboring cells (Fig. 11d); nuclei in anaphase (Fig. 11e) and daughter cell formation (Fig. 11f).
Discussion
Tracking of CECs in vivo is not widely performed to date due to a lack of suitable imaging techniques and paucity of data on labelling efficiency, duration of fluorescence, general toxicity, and effects of labelling on functionality of transplanted tissue21. The aim of this study was to determine whether NIR dye, and specifically for this study, DIR, could be used to label and track CECs, in vivo, without impacting cell viability or cellular function. We began by assessing the effect of DIR staining on wound healing, cell migration and cell viability, in vitro, using cultured primary human CEC’s. At the concentrations required for in vivo imaging, DIR stained CECs migrated at the same rate as unlabeled CECs. At 24 h post-labelling, there was no significant difference in cell death between labelled and unlabeled cells. Taken together, these results suggest that DIR was a viable candidate for use as a tracker in CECs. We subsequently assessed whether use of DIR had any deleterious effects in vivo. A single intracameral DIR injection was sufficient to label rabbit endothelial cells and was not associated with any apparent inflammation or acute disturbance of corneal endothelial function. We subsequently used DIR imaging to track the endothelial cells on EK transplants from human tissue. We found it was possible to obtain high quality images of human endothelial cells within the anterior chamber following EK. To our knowledge, this is the first time biological processes such as healing of iatrogenic wounds and migration of endothelial cells from donor to host have been observed in vivo.
At the macroscopic level, we found DIR imaging to be comparable to repeated trypan blue injection when assessing endothelial wound healing following standard injury; a model commonly used to assess pharmacological therapies aimed at enhancing endothelial regeneration22,23,24. High magnification assessment of the healing edge of the wound showed that comparable morphological information could be obtained from in vivo imaging as compared to immuno-histology following animal sacrifice. A temporal relationship between closure of endothelial wounds, as observed by DIR imaging, and restoration of corneal clarity/CCT was also seen in all cases. In vivo wound healing kinetics were similar to those we previously reported in unlabeled cells10. Images could be acquired through opaque/edematous corneas, something not possible with conventional confocal imaging. Combined, these findings suggest that DIR staining has no significant effect on endothelial function or healing and allows continuous, in vivo, assessment at all time points post-wounding. Assessment of endothelial transplants stained with DIR showed no diffusion of DIR across cell membranes from adjacent endothelial cells, meaning that staining of rabbit endothelial cells did not occur following xenotransplantation with human DMEK grafts (Fig. 8). This allowed for a clear distinction between transplanted human endothelial cells and native rabbit endothelial cells, even if cells had migrated on or off the transplant itself.
We have previously shown that rabbit endothelial cells are capable of rapidly migrating over bare DM with subsequent restoration of corneal clarity and thickness to pre-transplantation levels10. As such, it is important to be certain that any restoration of function is attributable to the transplanted cells and not a consequence of cellular regeneration in models where in vivo endothelial replication occurs25. Until now, detailed assessment of wound healing at different time points has relied either on repeated surgical interventions, in the case of trypan blue injection10, or on the sacrifice of animals at multiple time points26. Our assessments showed that a DIR fluorescence signal, allowing for high quality image acquisition, was retained for at least 28 days and in subsequent experimentation we have found fluorescence to be retained up to 60 days (data not shown).
With high resolution imaging, biological processes typically observed on histological examination could be seen in vivo; including cell spreading, apoptosis and cell division. In one animal, a reduction in corneal clarity, together with a development of corneal edema and an increase in corneal thickness occurred between days 21 and 28. DIR imaging showed numerous endothelial cells had detached from the DM and were freely floating in the aqueous. The cells remaining attached to DM displayed features consistent with an acute insult13. In the setting of xenotransplantation, these features were consistent with acute graft rejection27,28. In keeping with this, small DIR positive cells, consistent with previous reports of inflammatory cells, were observed interspersed with the endothelial cells were seen in both in the rabbit endothelial monolayer and transplanted human endothelial cells29.
Graft rejection remains a leading cause of transplant failure. Currently, models of rejection rely on indirect measures of endothelial function, and it is not always possible to separate rejection from other forms of endothelial trauma11,30. Methods of imaging inflammatory cell changes that proceed acute rejection in vivo will allow a greater understanding of the mechanisms at play31. Being able to assess the degree of cell death occurring during a rejection episode will provide information on the likelihood of recovery following rejection and effectiveness of anti-rejection strategies.
The use of NIR markers for tracking has several advantages. These tracers benefit from very low autofluorescence at NIR wavelengths and have excellent tissue penetration. This combination gives a high signal-to-noise ratio and allows non-invasive tracking of cells through the skin in organs such as the spleen or heart32. NIR tracers have recently been used in surgical trials to aid tumor clearance33 and in clinical ophthalmic trials to assess cell loss in patients with early glaucoma34. Using an 800 nm band pass, sufficient emitted light is captured for high quality imaging, and this is possible even through opaque corneas with significant edema. The NIR dye, indocyanine green (ICG), has been used in ophthalmology for over 5 decades. This means that dedicated equipment for imaging of NIR tracers in the eye are widely available in clinical and research settings. Our imaging protocol uses clinical equipment, designed for ICG imaging, with minimal adjustments.
Given that DIR staining is a simple, non-toxic, one step process, it is possible that this method could be applied to graft tissue destined for human use if a good manufacturing practice form of the dye were made available. For organ cultured tissue, the point at which graft tissue is transferred to dextran containing media may provide an ideal opportunity for this35. It is possible that DIR may also be useful to track other cells used in corneal regenerative therapy such as limbal epithelial21 or stromal stem cells36.
Our study showed that DIR fluorescence was initially quite heterogenous. This meant multiplexing with the viability dye, Calcein AM, was needed to assess immediate post-op graft viability. Fluorescence peaked at 24 h post transplantation making imaging easier, although some heterogeneity remained, meaning appropriately exposing the images was challenging. It may be possible to improve the use of DIR by combining several images taken at different sensitivities (iso settings); high dynamic range imaging37.
We believe that DIR imaging provides a powerful new tool for studying CECs in vivo. More detailed information about endothelial cell behavior following transplantation will improve our understanding of phenomena such as accelerated cell loss in high risk grafts and may lead to targeted therapeutics and improved graft survival. Its use in a research setting should ultimately lead to a reduction in the number of research animals needed and there is a potential for easy adoption in the clinical setting. Further studies confirming the exact length of time that DIR fluorescence persists in-vivo are warranted.
Methods
Study tissue
The use of cadaveric donor corneas for this study was approved by Singhealth centralized institutional review board (Ref: 2016/2839), and all cell-based research performed with human derived tissue was carried out in accordance with the tenets and the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki. For the expansion of primary CECs, research grade donor corneas with endothelial cell counts of > 1800 cells/mm2 with a storage time of < 14 days in Optisol-GS (Bausch & Lomb Rochester, New York) were procured from either Lions Eye Institute for Transplant and Research (Tampa, Florida, USA) or Saving Sights (Kansas City, Missouri, USA), with informed consent from the next of kin. The isolation and subsequent propagation of the primary CECs was achieved using a dual media approach as described38,39. Briefly the DM is peeled from the donor cornea, and subsequently subjected to a two-step enzymatic treatment to release the CECs from the DM. Isolated cells were seeded onto pre-coated collagen culture plate at a seeding density of at least 1.0 × 104 cells/cm2 and established in a maintenance medium (M5-Endo; Human Endothelial-SFM supplemented with 5% serum) overnight. Subsequently, CECs were cultured in the proliferative medium (M4-F99; Ham’s F12/M199, 5% serum, 20 μg/ml ascorbic acid, 1× ITS, and 10 ng/ml HrFGF) until they are approximately 80% confluent, before being re-exposed to M5-Endo for at least two days. The expanded CECs were then sub-cultured via single-cell dissociation using TrypLE Select, and plated at the desired seeding density for optimization studies. All cultured were carried out in a humidified atmosphere at 37 °C and 5% CO2.
For transplantation study, human corneo-scleral buttons with consent for research use were obtained from Miracles in Sight (Winston Salem, North Carolina, USA). Tissue preparation and transplantation was performed by a single surgeon (MB). Transplant grade tissue with endothelial cell counts of > 2200 cells/mm2 and a storage time < 14 days in Optisol-GS was used for all experimentation.
Research animals
Animals procured for this study were treated in accordance with the ARVO Statement for Use of Animal in Ophthalmic and Visual Research as well as the ARRIVE guidelines40, and all experiments involving these animals were approved by the Singhealth Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC; 2016/SHS/1212), Singapore. Interventions were performed in New Zealand white rabbits aged 16–20 weeks, weighing between 3 and 3.5 kg. All surgical procedures and clinical evaluations were performed in a single eye of each rabbit under general anesthesia from intra-muscular xylazine 5 mg/kg (Troy Laboratories, Smithfield, Australia) and ketamine 40 mg/kg (Parnell Laboratories, Alexandria, Australia) with additional topical anesthesia (lidocaine 1%, Bausch and Lomb, Rochester) as previously described10.
Animals underwent phacoemulsification at least 1 week prior to endothelial keratoplasty to deepen the anterior chamber. Vancomycin was used in the irrigating fluid (20 µg/ml) for surgical procedures and rabbits received subconjunctival dexamethasone (1 mg) and gentamcin (0.4 mg) at the end of all surgical procedures.
Prior to EK, rabbits were injected with intravenous unfractionated heparin (1000 units in 1 ml of normal saline). Heparin was also added to the balanced salt solution used to irrigate the eye at a concentration of 50 units/ml. For all experiments, rabbits were examined daily for the first 5 days and then on days 7, 14, 21, and 28. Examinations consisted of slit lamp biomicroscopy, tonometry, optical coherence tomography, confocal fluorescence imaging using the Heidelbreg HRA/Spectralis (Heidelberg Engineering GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany) and conventional corneal confocal imaging using the Heidelberg HRT-II with the Rostock module (Heidelberg Engineering GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany).
Optimizing DIR concentration in vivo
A stock solution of 1,1′-dioctadecyl-3,3,3′,3′-tetramethylindotricarbocyanine iodide (DIR) dye was made by dissolving 10 mg of DIR powder in 1 ml of pure ethanol (ThermoFisher Scientific, USA).
Primary cultured CECs were seeded at a concentration of 2 × 105 cells/cm2 in a Greiner 48-well flat bottom polystyrol microplate (Greiner, Frickenhausen, Germany), pre-coated with FNC coating mix. Cells were incubated with DIR diluted in M5 media39 at a concentration of 10–200 µg/ml overnight at 37 °C (N = 15 per concentration). The following day, cells were washed thrice in fresh culture media and imaged using the HRA/Spectralis at a standardized sensitivity of 100. Images were exported to ImageJ (National Institute of Health, Bethesda, USA) and converted to 8-bit. Mean grey values were measured in three separate regions of each plate and average fluorescence for each dose calculated. A comparison between groups was made using ANOVA.
Toxicity of DIR in vitro
DIR-labelled endothelial cells and controls were cultured for a further 48 h in fresh media. Calcein AM/ethidium homodimer/Hoechst were added to the cultured cells to achieve final concentrations of 2 µM, 4 µM and 10 µM respectively. The plate was gently agitated, incubated at 37 °C for 30 min and imaged on the fluorescence microscope. The viable ECD was calculated and compared between control and treated cells. A positive control was performed by using the same viability assessment in cells incubated with 70% ethanol for 1 min prior to assessment. A comparison between groups was made using ANOVA.
Effect of DIR on endothelial cell migration
As the primary aim of DIR tracking was to examine cell migration, a scratch wound assay was performed. Primary cultured CEC’s from the same donors were seeded onto different wells within the same plate. After reaching confluence, cells were cultured in M5 culture media with DIR 100 µg/ml or M5 media alone (controls). Each well received a single scratch using the tip of a 10 µl pipette. Plates were placed within the incuCyte imaging incubator (Sartorius, Essen Bioscience, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA). The incuCyte is a multiplex imaging system that is incorporated into an incubator, allowing continuous imaging in multiple wells without alterations in temperature or atmosphere. Image registration to define the scratch area was performed and serial phase-contrast images were taken every hour for 24 h. The wound area was measured every 3 h and expressed as a percentage of that measured at T = 0 h. Wound size was compared between stained cells and unstained controls using multiple t-tests.
Labelling of rabbit endothelial cells in vivo
0.2 ml of DIR, diluted in BSS at a concentration of 200 µg/ml was drawn into an insulin syringe and the needle inserted into the anterior chamber at the limbus, taking care to tunnel the entry for at least 1 mm. A 1.0 mm paracentesis was made using a diamond knife. 0.2 ml of aqueous was drawn into the insulin syringe achieving a final concentration of 100 µg/ml DIR. The posterior lip of the paracentesis was depressed causing expression of the aqueous all of the aqueous, after which the DIR was slowly injected thus performing a complete DIR/aqueous exchange and ensuring a concentration of not greater than 100 µg/ml. It is possible the final concentration was a little lower due to the inability to remove all of the aqueous and its rapid replenishment. The rabbits were kept with the treated eye facing down until the anaesthesia had worn off (approximately 45 min).
Imaging of endothelial cells post-operatively
Imaging was performed using the HRA/Spectralis set in the ICG mode. In the ICG mode, the HRA/Spectralis utilizes a 790 nm diode excitation laser and 800 nm long-pass filter. Images were captured at varying levels of magnification by attaching microscope objective lenses (Nikon, Japan) or the Rostock module to the standard fundus imaging lens by using custom built collars, as previously described3. Use of multiple lenses allowed both macroscopic and individual cell level imaging.
Comparison of DIR imaging and established methods in a wound healing model
Two weeks following DIR injection, 9 rabbits had 8 mm endothelial scrape wounds as described in our previous work10. 6 rabbits were sacrificed at day 3, one at day 5 and the remaining two animals were sacrificed at day 28. Pan-corneal images were acquired using the manufacture supplied anterior segment lens for the HRA/spectralis. These allowed tracking of the entire wound areas, macroscopically.
For higher magnification imaging, the inferior edge of the wound was located by moving the lens array up from the inferior limbus until the leading edge of migrating cells was seen, allowing a consistent area to be sampled for DIR and conventional in vivo confocal microscopy. In rabbits sacrificed at day 3, the endothelial wound was assessed by injecting trypan blue into the anterior chamber as previously described5. Trypan blue and DIR images were exported to ImageJ and the wound outlined using the polygon selection tool. This was converted to a smoothed spline and measurements of wound area and circularity were taken. The measurements for imaging technique were compared using a Bland–Altman plots.
After killing, the inferior cornea was marked by passage of a 6-0 silk suture through the limbus at the 6 o’clock position and used as a reference for immunohistology.
The corneas were harvested, washed in BSS and fixed in 1% paraformaldehyde at room temperature for 5 min. Samples were permeabilized in Triton-X 1% for 5 min and then blocked using and 2 step process, first in 10% goat serum for 45 min followed by 3% BSA for 45 min. Samples were incubated with primary antibody to ZO-1 (1:300, Thermofischer) or Human Nuclear Antigen (1:100, Merck-Millipore) at 4 °C for 24 h in a solution composed of phosphate buffered saline (PBS) with 0.1% Triton-X and 1% BSA. Samples were washed 3× with PBS, each for 10 min, and then incubated with secondary antibody, Hoechst (1:1000) and phalloidin (1:500), as required, overnight at 4 °C. To assess specificity of the immunostaining, corneas were processed without primary antibody. Specimens were washed 3× in PBS, re-fixed in 3% PFA, washed again and flat mounted in ProLong gold. The entire cornea was flat mounted and the inferior edge of the wounded area, in line with the silk suture was identified for imaging. Individual cells were manually outlined and cell metrics compared between in vivo images and flat-mounted, immunofluorescence images (stained with phalloidin, Hoechst and ZO-1). At day 3, when cells were still migrating, a comparison between cell circularity was made (a minimum of 100 cells were measured in each group). At day 28 when a stable monolayer was present, a comparison between cell circularity and the percentage of hexagon cells was made (neighbor analysis function in the BioVoxxel toolbox for ImageJ).
Labelling of ex vivo human corneas
Human corneas were labelled prior to tissue preparation for Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK) and following mircokeratome cutting for Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSAEK). The procedure was optimized in a series of initial experiments. To limit the amount of dye required and prevent corneal swelling, the corneas were kept within the Optisol-filled viewing chamber. Optisol was aspirated from the corneal cup and the endothelial surface further dried with cellulose sponges. DIR (100 µg/ml), diluted in M5 medium, was pipetted onto the endothelial surface until the entire endothelium and trabecular meshwork were covered. The epithelial surface remained suspended by the pillars of the viewing chamber and in contact with the Optisol, with the scleral rim acting as barrier to prevent the two media for mixing. The lid for the viewing chamber was replaced loosely and the corneas were incubated over night at 37 °C. For corneas in which a comparison between DIR and Calcein AM fluorescence was performed, corneas were rinsed 3× in fresh M5 media and the incubated with Calcein AM 1.67 µM in BSS for 30 min prior to surgery.
Tissue was prepared and implanted using our previously described techniques for DMEK (n = 4)5,41 and DSAEK (n = 6)42 and imaging for Calcein AM and DIR fluorescence performed alongside the standard examinations, following the review schedule outlined above.
Statistical analysis
All statistical analysis was conducted using Prism (Graphpad software LLC, San Diego, USA). Unless otherwise stated significance was set at 5%. For multiple comparisons a Bonferroni adjustment was performed.
Abbreviations
- CECs:
-
Corneal endothelial cells
- ECD:
-
Endothelial cell density
- CCT:
-
Central corneal thickness
- OCT:
-
Optical coherence tomography
- EK:
-
Endothelial keratoplasty
- NIR:
-
Near-infrared
- DIR:
-
1,1′-Dioctadecyl-3,3,3′,3′-tetramethylindotricarbocyanine iodide
- DM:
-
Descemet’s membrane
- DMEK:
-
Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty
- DSAEK:
-
Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty
- ICG:
-
Indocyanine green
References
Gauthier, A. S. et al. Very early endothelial cell loss after penetrating keratoplasty with organ-cultured corneas. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 101, 1113–1118. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2016-309615 (2017).
Monnereau, C. et al. Multicenter study of descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: First case series of 18 surgeons. JAMA Ophthalmol. 132, 1192–1198. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.1710 (2014).
Bhogal, M., Balda, M. S., Matter, K. & Allan, B. D. Global cell-by-cell evaluation of endothelial viability after two methods of graft preparation in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 100, 572–578. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-307534 (2016).
Bhogal, M., Matter, K., Balda, M. S. & Allan, B. D. Organ culture storage of pre-prepared corneal donor material for Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 100, 1576–1583. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2016-308855 (2016).
Bhogal, M. et al. Real-time assessment of corneal endothelial cell damage following graft preparation and donor insertion for DMEK. PLoS ONE 12, e0184824. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184824 (2017).
Feng, M. T., Price, M. O., Miller, J. M. & Price, F. W. Jr. Air reinjection and endothelial cell density in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: Five-year follow-up. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 40, 1116–1121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.04.023 (2014).
Landry, H. et al. Corneal endothelial toxicity of air and SF6. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 52, 2279–2286. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.10-6187 (2011).
Mitry, D. et al. Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty after failed penetrating keratoplasty: Survival, rejection risk, and visual outcome. JAMA Ophthalmol. 132, 742–749. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.352 (2014).
Maurino, V. & Aiello, F. Glaucoma risks in advanced corneal surgery. Prog. Brain Res. 221, 271–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.pbr.2015.06.009 (2015).
Bhogal, M., Lwin, C. N., Seah, X. Y., Peh, G. & Mehta, J. S. Allogeneic Descemet’s membrane transplantation enhances corneal endothelial monolayer formation and restores functional integrity following Descemet’s stripping. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 58, 4249–4260. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.17-22106 (2017).
Liu, Y. C., Lwin, N. C., Chan, N. S. & Mehta, J. S. Use of anterior segment optical coherence tomography to predict corneal graft rejection in small animal models. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 55, 6736–6741. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.14-14475 (2014).
Rio-Cristobal, A. & Martin, R. Corneal assessment technologies: Current status. Surv. Ophthalmol. 59, 599–614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.survophthal.2014.05.001 (2014).
Ang, M. et al. Evaluation of a micro-optical coherence tomography for the corneal endothelium in an animal model. Sci. Rep. 6, 29769. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep29769 (2016).
McCarey, B. E., Edelhauser, H. F. & Lynn, M. J. Review of corneal endothelial specular microscopy for FDA clinical trials of refractive procedures, surgical devices, and new intraocular drugs and solutions. Cornea 27, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0b013e31815892da (2008).
Raecker, M. E., McLaren, J. W., Kittleson, K. M. & Patel, S. V. Endothelial image quality after descemet stripping with endothelial keratoplasty: A comparison of three microscopy techniques. Eye Contact Lens 37, 6–10. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICL.0b013e318203dc19 (2011).
Tanaka, H. et al. Panoramic view of human corneal endothelial cell layer observed by a prototype slit-scanning wide-field contact specular microscope. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 101, 655–659. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2016-308893 (2017).
Gasser, L., Daniel, M., Reinhard, T. & Bohringer, D. Long-term tracking of the central corneal endothelial mosaic. PLoS ONE 9, e88603. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088603 (2014).
Ong, A. P. et al. Post-surgical versus post-intravitreal injection endophthalmitis: Changing patterns in causative flora. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 47, 57–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/ceo.13345 (2019).
Bahn, C. F. et al. Penetrating keratoplasty in the cat. A clinically applicable model. Ophthalmology 89, 687–699. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(82)34750-8 (1982).
Haydari, M. N. et al. A short-term in vivo experimental model for Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 53, 6343–6354. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.12-9708 (2012).
Genicio, N., Gallo Paramo, J. & Shortt, A. J. Quantum dot labeling and tracking of cultured limbal epithelial cell transplants in vitro. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 56, 3051–3059. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.14-15973 (2015).
Hoppenreijs, V. P., Pels, E., Vrensen, G. F. & Treffers, W. F. Corneal endothelium and growth factors. Surv. Ophthalmol. 41, 155–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0039-6257(96)80005-1 (1996).
Nakano, Y. et al. Connexin43 knockdown accelerates wound healing but inhibits mesenchymal transition after corneal endothelial injury in vivo. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 49, 93–104. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.07-0255 (2008).
Meekins, L. C. et al. Corneal endothelial cell migration and proliferation enhanced by rho kinase (ROCK) inhibitors in in vitro and in vivo models. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 57, 6731–6738. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.16-20414 (2016).
Hitani, K. et al. Transplantation of a sheet of human corneal endothelial cell in a rabbit model. Mol. Vis. 14, 1–9 (2008).
Koizumi, N., Okumura, N. & Kinoshita, S. Development of new therapeutic modalities for corneal endothelial disease focused on the proliferation of corneal endothelial cells using animal models. Exp. Eye Res. 95, 60–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exer.2011.10.014 (2012).
Qian, Y. & Dana, M. R. Molecular mechanisms of immunity in corneal allotransplantation and xenotransplantation. Expert Rev. Mol. Med. 3, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1462399401003246 (2001).
Ross, J. R., Howell, D. N. & Sanfilippo, F. P. Characteristics of corneal xenograft rejection in a discordant species combination. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 34, 2469–2476 (1993).
Koudouna, E. et al. Immune cells on the corneal endothelium of an allogeneic corneal transplantation rabbit model. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 58, 242–251. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.16-20019 (2017).
Flynn, T. H. et al. Use of ultrasonic pachymetry for measurement of changes in corneal thickness in mouse corneal transplant rejection. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 94, 368–371. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2009.160671 (2010).
Chauhan, S. K., Jurkunas, U., Funaki, T., Dastjerdi, M. & Dana, R. Quantification of allospecific and nonspecific corneal endothelial cell damage after corneal transplantation. Eye 29, 136–144. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2014.248 (2015).
Merian, J., Gravier, J., Navarro, F. & Texier, I. Fluorescent nanoprobes dedicated to in vivo imaging: From preclinical validations to clinical translation. Molecules 17, 5564–5591. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules17055564 (2012).
Vahrmeijer, A. L., Hutteman, M., van der Vorst, J. R., van de Velde, C. J. & Frangioni, J. V. Image-guided cancer surgery using near-infrared fluorescence. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 10, 507–518. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrclinonc.2013.123 (2013).
Cordeiro, M. F. et al. Real-time imaging of single neuronal cell apoptosis in patients with glaucoma. Brain 140, 1757–1767. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awx088 (2017).
Pels, E., Beele, H. & Claerhout, I. Eye bank issues: II. Preservation techniques: Warm versus cold storage. Int. Ophthalmol. 28, 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-007-9086-1 (2008).
Hertsenberg, A. J. et al. Corneal stromal stem cells reduce corneal scarring by mediating neutrophil infiltration after wounding. PLoS ONE 12, e0171712. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171712 (2017).
Vinegoni, C. et al. Real-time high dynamic range laser scanning microscopy. Nat. Commun. 7, 11077. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms11077 (2016).
Peh, G. S. L. et al. Regulatory compliant tissue-engineered human corneal endothelial grafts restore corneal function of rabbits with bullous keratopathy. Sci. Rep. 7, 14149. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-14723-z (2017).
Peh, G. S. L. et al. Propagation of human corneal endothelial cells: A novel dual media approach. Cell Transplant. 24, 287–304. https://doi.org/10.3727/096368913x675719 (2015).
Percie du Sert, N. et al. The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research. PLoS Biol. 18, e3000410. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000410 (2020).
Bhogal, M., Maurino, V. & Allan, B. D. Use of a single peripheral triangular mark to ensure correct graft orientation in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 41, 2022–2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.08.005 (2015).
Bhogal, M. S. & Allan, B. D. Graft profile and thickness as a function of cut transition speed in Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 38, 690–695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.09.046 (2012).
Acknowledgements
We thank Lion Eye Institute for Transplant and Research and Miracles in Sights for their assistance with procurement of all the research-grade donor corneas used in this study. This research is supported by the Singapore Ministry of Health’s National Medical Research Council under its Clinician Scientist Award (CSA) (MOH-000197). The funding bodies had no role in study design, data collection, analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
M.B. and J.S.M. conceptualized and designed the study; M.B. and G.P. supervised the research; S.J.L. and K.A. carried out the in vitro characterization studies and contributed to data analysis; M.B., H.P.A., and C.N.L. were involved in the animal studies. M.B. coordinated the study and together with G.P. and J.S.M. prepared the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Video S1.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Bhogal, M., Ang, HP., Lin, SJ. et al. Near infra-red labelling and tracking of corneal endothelial cells in-vivo. Sci Rep 12, 6338 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-09677-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-09677-w
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.