Abstract
The Cerrado is one of the most important regions for agricultural development in the world and is the main productive breadbasket of the Americas. One of the main agricultural activities in the region is high-tech livestock. Cerrado soils are predominantly low in fertility, and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi play a fundamental role in plant nutrition in this biome. Understanding the behavior of mycorrhizal fungi in the soil under pasture is essential for the development of more efficient and sustainable management practices. Thus, this work aims to verify the activity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in different species of forage grasses cultivated in cerrado soil. To measure mycorrhizal activity, soil spore density factors and mycorrhizal colonization rates in roots of 14 forage grass genotypes were investigated. No significant differences were identified in spore density values between the investigated genotypes. Panicum maximum cv and Mombasa showed the lowest values of mycorrhizal colonization, and the highest values were found in the roots of Brachiaria decumbens. Among the identified genera associated with the rhizosphere of the genotypes studied, Gigaspora, Scutelospora and Sclerocysts are less frequent, which indicates that the association with these fungal genera is less recurrent than with the others.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The Cerrado is the second largest Brazilian biome, extending over an area of 2,045,064 km2 and spanning eight states of Central Brazil: Minas Gerais, Goiás, Tocantins, Bahia, Maranhão, Mato Grosso, Mato Grosso do Sul, Piauí and Distrito Federal1. It is divided by three of the largest hydrographic basins in South America, with regular rainfall indices that provide great biodiversity. After the Amazon, the Cerrado today is considered the last agricultural frontier of the Americas2,3,4.
The Cerrado is considered to be a “biodiversity hotspot”, as it has one of the greatest levels of biodiversity on the planet. Such levels of biological diversity are achieved due to it being a transition biome that is in direct geographic contact with other important South American biomes, such as the Amazon, Caatinga, Atlantic Forest, Pantanal and Bolivian Chacos2,5. From a natural history perspective, the Cerrado could be considered a biogeographic region that is more than 40 million years old6,7,8,9. Such biogeographic continuity has resulted in a symbiosis between flora, fauna and microorganisms3. Due to its privileged location, the Cerrado stands out as one of the most important agricultural frontiers in the world3,4, with much of the area today consisting of large-scale industrial agriculture and degraded pastures10,11.
With the current productive paradigm, environmental sustainability is considered to be an important factor in determining the success of production systems. In agriculture, no-tillage systems are being promoted as a cultivation system that promotes soil and water conservation12,13. For no-tillage systems to maintain levels of productivity, vegetation cover is an adequate factor. For conditions in the Cerrado, vegetation cover must have a low carbon–nitrogen ratio, which decreases the decomposition speed and increases the time in which the cover protects the soil from erosive processes14. In this sense, grasses stand out as ideal plant cover for no-tillage systems in the Cerrado, in addition to being important forages for animal grazing15. Natural cover systems based on symbiotic systems may also reduce the use of herbicides, which have been used extensively for no-till systems in the tropical climates of Brazil16.
Generally, Cerrados are environments that naturally offer adverse abiotic conditions for plant growth and development. With low phosphorus levels and irregular rainfall, vegetation depends directly on the performance of mycorrhizal fungi to resist surviving such conditions, which is attributed to the association between fungi and plants as an important factor in building resilience to stressful situations1,17,17,19.
The association of mycorrhizal fungi with vegetation started its evolution in tropical regions, and there are even species that are found only in these regions20. Today, however, the presence of these fungi is reported in different regions of the planet, regardless of climate19,21,21,22,23,25.
The average density of mycorrhizal fungal species in the soils of the Cerrado varies from 25 to 50 spores per 50 cm3 of soil on average. In the neighboring region of the Caatinga, there is a variation in the number of propagules of these fungi, probably due to differences in the plant community, and in relation to chemical composition and land use, with ranges containing high phosphorus6,26.
For agricultural production, combined with the recovery of degraded areas, understanding the behavior of forage grass species with soil biology is essential for the development of more efficient practices for the management of natural resources. Cerrados are environments that offer adverse abiotic conditions for plant growth and development, with low levels of phosphorus and a limited water regime, and the development of their vegetation depends directly on the action of soil microorganisms. Under these conditions, mycorrhizal fungi stand out as organisms that promote plant growth and contribute to plant resilience to stressful situations1,17,17,19,27. Therefore, this work aims to verify the mycorrhizal population dynamics in forage grass species in Cerrado soils.
Materials and methods
The experiment was conducted at the Agrostological Field of the Ricardo Fontoura Experimental Station of the Cerrado, which is part of the Evangelical College of Goianésia, in the state of Goiás, Brazil. The climate is classified as a tropical season (AW) characterized by two well-defined seasons: dry and rainy14. The density of spores and the mycorrhizal colonization rate of 14 varieties of forage grasses were evaluated (Table 1).
Samples of rhizospherical soil containing the treatment roots described in Table 1 were collected. Each sample taken to the laboratory was composed of 3 simple samples randomly collected from each plot. The design had a completely updated design with 6 replicates. Sampling was carried out at the end of the dry season in September 2020.
The analyses were carried out in the laboratory of agricultural microbiology of the Evangelical College of Goianésia. The spores of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) were extracted from 50 cm3 of rhizospherical soil by wet sieving15 followed by centrifugation in water and a 50% sucrose solution. The spores were separated according to their phenotypic characteristics, such as color, size and shape, composing the different morphotypes under stereoscopic binocular magnifying glass28.
To determine the percentage of colonization, the roots were clarified and ordered with 0.05% Trypan Blue in lactoglycerol16 and the colonization was evaluated under under a stereoscopic microscope, following the quadrant intersection technique17.
To identify the genera of AMF from morphological characteristics, the spores were separated according to their morphotypes and mounted on blades with pure polyvinyl-lactoglycerol (PVLG) and PVLG mixed with Melzer (1:1 v/v). To support the identification work, original articles from the descriptions of species were provided on the website of the "International Culture Collection of Arbuscular and Vesicular–Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi"18,29.
The data were submitted to variance analysis by the Assistat30 analyses of canonical correspondence were performed by the Past20,31 software. Spore density variables, and the rate of mycorrhizal colonization was determined by a 5% Tukey test. The presence of identified genera was used as the parameter for multivariate analysis.
The conduct of the experiment followed the International guidelines of the IUCN Policy Statement on Research Involving Species at Risk of Extinction. The plant material studied, as a perennial species, is available for study and review at the agrostological field of the Evangelical College of Goianésia.
Results and discussion
For the determination of ecological interactions between AMF and forage grasses, the values of density of spores in the soil, mycorrhizal colonization rate in the root, and the presence of genera of AMF associated with the rhizosphere are used as parameters. No significant difference was verified between the analyzed varieties when investigating the density of spores in rhizospherical soil of forage grass varieties in Cerrado soils (Fig. 1a). P values for spore density were 0.2868 and for colonization were 0.1662.
The mycorrhizal colonization rate showed a significant difference (p < 0.05). Urochloa decumbens presented the highest mycorrhizal colonization rate (78%) compared to the others. The species Megathyrsus maximus cv. Zuri, Megathyrsus maximus cv. Aruana and Megathyrsus maximus cv. Mombasa presented the lowest values of mycorrhizal colonization in its roots, 33%, 34% and 27%, respectively (Fig. 1b).
The absence of a significant difference in spore density values is because the varieties were installed in the same area and where they are probably being colonized by the same fungal species, since they present low specificity. It is expected that there is no difference in the sporulation of fungi from the same area, since spore production is a response of the fungus and not of the host plant. The production of spores is a reflection of the fungus to environmental changes that, under stressful conditions, begin to produce spores as a resistance structure21,22,32.
The samplings were carried out at the end of the dry season. In the cerrado, the climate is classified as tropical seasonal (AW) characterized by two well-defined seasons: a dry period and a rainy period33. These climatic conditions are considered stressful for most soil organisms due to the absence of rainfall for more than 4 consecutive months, which explains the high values of spore density values in the soil12,23.
Forage plants do not present specificity for the colonization of mycorrhizal fungi and can be colonized by more than one species of fungus24. However, some plant species have higher mycorrhizal colonization rates than others. Different species may present different values of colonization in the same environment, which is a reflection of the evolutionary adaptability of this symbiotic association34,29,30,37.
Mycorrhizal colonization values indicate the intensity to which fungi have to associate with vegetation to assist with functions such as water and nutrient absorption (MOREIRA; SIQUEIRA, 2006). Because it is the same soil, the variation in mycorrhizal colonization values is explained by the physiological differences of plants and not fungi. This behavior can be observed when comparing forage plants, such as Megathyrsus maximus and Brachiaria brizanta, which presented similar colonization rates, regardless of cultivar38,39,40.
Table 2 shows the genera identified in the soil of the grasses investigated. The genera Acaulospora and Glomus were identified in all plants investigated, while the genus Slerocystis was identified to be associated only with B. brizantha piatã.
Canonical correspondence analysis aims to identify the proximity of the presence of mycorrhizal fungi identified with the grass species investigated (Fig. 2).
The genera of mycorrhizal fungi identified were commonly found in the rhizosphere of all grasses investigated, except for the genera Gigaspora, Scutelospora and Sclerocysts, which indicates that the association with these genera of fungi is less recurrent than with the other genera. The genera Glomus and Acaulospora are commonly found in Cerrado soils6. When investigating the biodiversity of AMF in Cerrado soils, the same genera were found to be associated with bamboo41, sugarcane42,43, sorghum and corn44.
The grasses present substantial mycorrhizal colonization volume for the root system of the grasses, which favors fungal colonization. The adaptability of this plant family to the natural conditions of the Cerrado also favors the exposure of the plant to the action of the fungus when subjected to situations of environmental stress, especially water.
Conclusion
The spore density values do not vary among the species of fodder studied. This parameter is independent of the plant, as it is a physiological response of the fungus. On the other hand, Urochloa decumbens presented higher values of mycorrhizal colonization. The genera of mycorrhizal fungi identified are commonly found in the rhizosphere of all grasses investigated, except for the genera Gigaspora, Scutelospora and Sclerocysts, and these genera of fungi are less recurrent than the other genera.
Change history
01 March 2022
A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-07665-8
References
Hunke, P., Mueller, E. N., Schröder, B. & Zeilhofer, P. The Brazilian Cerrado: Assessment of water and soil degradation in catchments under intensive agricultural use. Ecohydrology 8, 1154–1180 (2015).
Klink, C. a. & Machado, R. B. A conservação do Cerrado brasileiro. Megadiversidade 1, 147–155 (2005).
Dutra e Silva, S. Challenging the Environmental History of the Cerrado: Science, Biodiversity and Politics on the Brazilian Agricultural Frontier. LAHAC 1, (2020).
Nehring, R. Yield of dreams: Marching west and the politics of scientific knowledge in the Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (Embrapa). Geoforum 77, 206–217 (2016).
Taber, A., Navarro, G. & Arribas, M. A. A new park in the Bolivian Gran Chaco—an advance in tropical dry forest conservation and community-based management. Oryx 31, 189 (1997).
Moura, de, J. B. & Cabral, J. S. R. Mycorrhiza in Central Savannahs: Cerrado and Caatinga. In Mycorrhizal Fungi in South America. vol. 1 (Springer International Publishing, 2019).
de Brito Neves, B. B. & Cordani, U. G. Tectonic evolution of South America during the Late Proterozoic. Precambrian Res. 53, 23–40 (1991).
Laux, J. H., Pimentel, M. M., Dantas, E. L., Armstrong, R. & Junges, S. L. Two neoproterozoic crustal accretion events in the Brasília belt, central Brazil. J. S. Am. Earth Sci. 18, 183–198 (2005).
Simon, M. F. et al. Recent assembly of the Cerrado, a neotropical plant diversity hotspot, by in situ evolution of adaptations to fire. PNAS 106, 20359–20364 (2009).
Guimarães Andrade, R. et al. Indicativo de pastagens plantadas em processo de degradação no bioma Cerrado. In XVII Simpósio Brasileiro de Sensoriamento Remot 1585–1592 (INPE, 2015).
Arruda, A. B. et al. Resistance of soil to penetration as a parameter indicator of subsolation in crop areas of sugar cane. Sci. Rep. 11, 11780 (2021).
Bongiorno, G. et al. Sensitivity of labile carbon fractions to tillage and organic matter management and their potential as comprehensive soil quality indicators across pedoclimatic conditions in Europe. Ecol. Ind. 99, 38–50 (2019).
Dias-Filho, M. B. Desafios da produção animal em pastagens na fronteira agrícola brasileira. Embrapa Amazônia Oriental-Documentos (INFOTECA-E) (2012).
Andrade Júnior, J. A. D., Ribeiro De Souza, B., Souza, R. F. & de Moura, J. B. Fixação de carbono em sistemas agroecológicos na região do vale do são patrício, goiás carbon sequestration in agroecological systems in the region of the são patrício valley, goiás. Científic@ Multidiscip. J. ISSN 5, 85–98 (2018).
Andrade de Souza Moraes, J. M. et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in integrated crop livestock systems with intercropping in the pasture phase in the Cerrado. Rhizosphere 11 (2019).
Ofstehage, A. & Nehring, R. No-till agriculture and the deception of sustainability in Brazil. Int. J. Agric. Sustain. 19, 335–348 (2021).
Thomazini, L. I. Mycorrhiza in plants of the ‘Cerrado’. Plant Soil 41, 707–711 (1974).
Porcel, R. & Ruiz-Lozano, J. M. Arbuscular mycorrhizal influence on leaf water potential, solute accumulation, and oxidative stress in soybean plants subjected to drought stress. J. Exp. Bot. 55, 1743–1750 (2004).
Moura, de, J. B., Valentim, N. M., Ventura, M. V. A. & Junior, W. G. V. Taxa de colonização micorrízica sob diferentes sistemas de cultivo no cerrado em cana-de-açúcar. 2, 60–66 (2017).
Pirozynski, K. A. Interactions between fungi and plants through the ages. Can. J. Bot. 59, 1824–1827 (1981).
Muthukumar, T., Udaiyan, K. & Shanmughavel, P. Mycorrhiza in sedges—an overview. Mycorrhiza 14, 65–77 (2004).
Aliasgharzadeh, N., Rastin, S. N., Towfighi, H. & Alizadeh, A. Occurrence of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in saline soils of the Tabriz Plain of Iran in relation to some physical and chemical properties of soil. Mycorrhiza 11, 119–122 (2001).
Gehring, C. A. & Connell, J. H. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in the tree seedlings of two Australian rain forests: Occurrence, colonization, and relationships with plant performance. Mycorrhiza 16, 89–98 (2006).
Vestberg, M. Occurrence of some Glomales in Finland. Mycorrhiza 5, 329–336 (1995).
Khan, A. G. Occurrence and importance of mycorrhizae in aquatic trees of New South Wales, Australia. Mycorrhiza 3, 31–38 (1993).
Braz, S. P., Urquiaga, S., Alves, B. J. R. & Boddey, R. M. Degradação de Pastagens, Matéria Orgânica do Solo e a Recuperação do Potencial Produtivo em Sistemas de Baixo “Input” Tecnológico na Região dos Cerrados (2004).
Vieira Jr, W. G. et al. Seasonal variation in mycorrhizal community of different cerrado phytophysiomies. Front. Microbiol. 11 (2020).
Gerdemann, J. W. & Nicolson, T. H. Spores of mycorrhizal endogone species extracted from soil by wet sieving and decanting. Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 46, 235–244 (1963).
INVAM. International Culture Collection of (Vesicular) Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi | West Virginia University. (2018).
SILVA, F. de A. ASSISTAT: Versão 7.7 beta. (DEAG-CTRN-Universidade Federal de Campina Grande, 2008).
Hammer, Ø. Past 3.x—the Past of the Future. (Natural History Museum, University of Oslo, 2018).
Cavalcanti, A. C. R., Cavallini, M. C. & Lima, N. R. C. de B. Estresse por Déficit Hídrico em Plantas Forrageiras. 50 https://www.infoteca.cnptia.embrapa.br/bitstream/doc/748148/1/doc89.pdf (2009).
Alvares, C. A., Stape, J. L., Sentelhas, P. C., De Moraes, J. L. G. & Sparovek, G. Köppen’s climate classification map for Brazil. Metereol Z 22(6), 711–728 (2014).
Nicolson, T. H. Vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhiza in the Gramineae. Nature 181, 718–719 (1958).
Soreng, R. J. et al. A worldwide phylogenetic classification of the Poaceae (Gramineae) II: An update and a comparison of two 2015 classifications. J. Syst. Evol. 55, 259–290 (2017).
Teutscherova, N. et al. Differences in arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization and P acquisition between genotypes of the tropical Brachiaria grasses: Is there a relation with BNI activity?. Biol. Fertil. Soils 55, 325–337 (2019).
de Miranda, J. C. C. Cerrado: Micorriza Arbuscular, Ocorrência e Manejo. (Embrapa, 2008).
Souza, B. R., Moura, J. B., Oliveira, T. C., Ramos, M. L. G. & Lopes Filho, L. C. Arbuscular Mycorrhizal fungi as indicative of soil quality in conservation systems in the region of vale do São Patrício, Goiás. Int. J. Curr. Res. 8, 43307–43311 (2016).
de Oliveira, T. C. et al. Produtividade da soja em associação ao fungo micorrízico arbuscular Rhizophagus clarus cultivada em condições de campo. Rev. Ciênc. Agrovet. 18, 530–535 (2019).
Moura, J. B. et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi associated with bamboo under Cerrado Brazilian vegetation. J. Soil Sci. Plant. Nutr https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-019-00093-0 (2019).
Phillips, J. M. & Hayman, D. S. Improved procedures for clearing roots and staining parasitic and vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for rapid assessment of infection. Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 55, 158–161 (1970).
Giovannetti, M. & Mosse, B. An evaluation of techniques for measuring vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal infection in roots. New Phytol. 84, 489–500 (1980).
Promita, D. & Mohan, K. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal diversity in sugarcane rhizosphere in relation with soil properties. Notulae Scientia Biologicae 4(1), 66–74 (2012).
Aquino, S. D. S. et al. Mycorrhizal colonization and diversity and corn genotype yield in soils of the Cerrado region, Brazil. Semin. Cienc. Agrar. 36, 4107–4117 (2015).
Acknowledgements
Acknowledgments to the Foundation for Research Support in the State of Goiás - FAPEG, National Council for Scientific and Technological Development - CNPq, Evangelical Educational Association - AEE and Federal Institute of Goiás - IFGoiano. This research was funded in whole, or in part, by the Wellcome Trust [Grant number 217968/Z/19/Z]. For the purpose of open access, the author has applied a CC BY public copyright license to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising from this submission.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
L.L.S.—Responsible for the execution of the project R.N.A. advisor of master's analysis M.J.B.—General coordinator of the project, responsible for writing S.R.F.—Responsible for the soil laboratory S.M.E.F.—responsible for spore analysis M.L.F., responsible for the field experiment X.E.G.—responsible for field guidance S.J.M.—responsible for colonization analyses D.eS.S.—Responsible for correcting the text. N.R.—Responsible for correcting the text.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The original online version of this Article was revised: The Acknowledgments section in the original version of this Article was incomplete. It now reads: “Acknowledgments to the Foundation for Research Support in the State of Goiás - FAPEG, National Council for Scientific and Technological Development - CNPq, Evangelical Educational Association - AEE and Federal Institute of Goiás - IFGoiano. This research was funded in whole, or in part, by the Wellcome Trust [Grant number 217968/Z/19/Z]. For the purpose of open access, the author has applied a CC BY public copyright license to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising from this submission.”
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
dos Santos Lucas, L., Neto, A.R., de Moura, J.B. et al. Mycorrhizal fungi arbuscular in forage grasses cultivated in Cerrado soil. Sci Rep 12, 3103 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-07088-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-07088-5
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.