Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Path planning of scenic spots based on improved A* algorithm


Traditional scenic route planning only considers the shortest path, which ignores the information of scenic road conditions. As the most effective direct search method to solve the shortest path in static road network, A* algorithm can plan the optimal scenic route by comprehensively evaluating the weights of each expanded node in the gridded scenic area. However, A* algorithm has the problem of traversing more nodes and ignoring the cost of road in the route planning. In order to bring better travel experience to the travelers, the above factors are taken into account. This paper presents a path planning method based on the improved A* algorithm. Firstly, the heuristic function of the A* algorithm is weighted by exponential decay to improve the calculation efficiency of the algorithm. Secondly, in order to increase the practicality of the A* algorithm, the impact factors that road conditions is introduced to the evaluation function. Finally, the feasibility of the improved A* algorithm is verified through simulation experiments. Experimental results show that the improved A* algorithm can effectively reduce the calculation time and road cost.


With the development of social economy, people's living standards have improved significantly, and tourism has become one of the most enthusiastic ways for people in their spare time. For tourists, the terrain of scenic spots is often rugged, so it is essential to keep enough energy to visit them. At the same time, for scenic spots, an efficient tour path can also reduce the congestion of scenic spots and improve the resource utilization of scenic spots, which is conducive to the sustainable and healthy development of scenic spots1. Therefore, reasonable tour path planning is very important to tourists' experience.

For the optimal path solving problem, researchers have proposed many classical algorithms including dijestra algorithm, Flow Direction algorithm2, etc. Dijkstra algorithm was proposed in 1959, and the algorithm is suitable for static networks, that is, when the weight in the network is fixed and there is no negative weight3. In the improvement of the algorithm, Zhang et al. proposed a path planning method based on dijkstra, which can save driving time and oil consumption4. Rosita et al. used vector normalization technology combined with dijkstra algorithm to achieve the optimal distribution path of products5. Sabri et al. used the combination of dijkstra algorithm and ant colony algorithm to find the safest escape path in high-rise buildings6. Ant colony algorithm was proposed by Italian scientist Dorigo according to the foraging process of animals, and the algorithm was originally used to solve the traveling salesman problem7. After that, many researchers improved the algorithm, for example, Zhou et al. optimized the intelligent logistics distribution path based on the improved ant colony algorithm, which was better to improve the dynamic optimization performance of the algorithm8. Yu et al. combined a special genetic operator in the ant colony algorithm, which not only avoids the local search limitations of the ant colony algorithm, but also enhances the global optimal searching ability of the ant colony algorithm9. In addition, there are many algorithms and improvements for solving the shortest path problem, such as, Miao et al. proposed an improved adaptive ant colony algorithm. While improving the real-time and security of robot path planning, balance the convergence and global search ability of ant colony algorithm, and transform the path planning problem into a multi-objective optimization problem by introducing multi-objective performance index, so as to realize the global comprehensive optimization of robot path planning10. Hsieh et al. proposed a route planning algorithm which combines the two-way fast-exploring random tree algorithm and greedy algorithm to generate various route planning schemes for ice navigation, and evaluated and selected a relatively optimal route with a lower risk scheme through a risk index11. Rakita et al. proposed a new sampling-based path planning method, which quickly finds solutions to high-dimensional path planning problems by minimizing the number of collision check samples12. Pan et al. used the improved floyd algorithm to design the optimal delivery path for take-out food, so that the travel time of the vehicle after optimization was shortened and the time efficiency was improved, but the algorithm did not consider the impact of road conditions13. Wu et al. combined normal distributed random numbers with genetic algorithms, and considered traveling least costs and the traveling highest experience index to construct the optimal tourism path14. Although the algorithms have been improved for their respective problems, some of their inherent shortcomings are difficult to eradicate. As the most effective direct search method for solving the shortest path in static road network, A* algorithm has been improved countless. Wang et al. Introduced the turning factor into the A* algorithm to solve the K shortest path problem. At the same time, they proposed a dynamic path planning method based on the A* algorithm, which can effectively search the shortest path and avoid collision15. Liu et al. Proposed an improved A* algorithm to solve the combination of normal channel and berthing channel16. Uttendorf et al. combined the fuzzy inference system with the A* algorithm to generate a path map for automatically guided vehicles17. Das et al. proposed an online path planning method based on an improved real-time A* algorithm, which plans the optimal path by avoiding obstructions and minimizing time, energy, and distance as the cost18. Shin et al. proposed an improved A* algorithm using Automatic Identification System (AIS) and weather data, and it finds the optimal paths by minimizing the estimated time of arrival generated by machine learning through 16-way node exploration19. Alani et al. proposed a new technique that consists of a hybridizing of A* algorithm and ant colony optimization, and the new technology can more accurately find the best parking path20. Pradhan et al. and Pardines both proposed to implement shopping guide path recommendations based on consumers' shopping lists, but they did not consider the problem of supermarket space modeling21,22. Ma et al. proposed a navigation path planning method for articulated underground scrapers based on improved A* algorithm to improve search efficiency23. Rahul et al. solved the problem of robotic path planning using a combination of A* algorithm and Fuzzy Inference, which finds the shortest path and generates the result in a finite time24.

In the above path planning study, there are many Dijkstra methods and swarm intelligence algorithms. Although the algorithms have been improved for their own problems, the inefficiency of the Dijkstra algorithm itself and the problem of the ant colony algorithm which is sensitive to the algorithm parameters are difficult to solve. In addition, the improvement of A* algorithm still has the problem of ignoring road cost. In order to provide better scenic route planning for passengers, this paper presents a route planning method based on improved A* algorithm. By exponentially weighting the heuristic function of the A* algorithm, the calculation efficiency of the algorithm is improved, and the A* algorithm is improved by using the road condition information of scenic spots as the evaluation index, which makes the algorithm more applicable to the actual scenic spot route planning.

A* algorithm

The A* algorithm combines the advantages of the dijkstra algorithm and the breadth first search algorithm, which has better performance in the search25,26. The basic idea of the algorithm is as follows: First, find all neighbor nodes of the current search node. Second, compute the evaluation function value of each neighboring node, and the evaluation function in path planning is the distance from the initial node S to the goal node G. Finally, select the node which has the minimum evaluation function. The above process is repeated until the search reaches the end point.

The evaluation function of each node n is defined as follows:

$$ {\text{f}}({\text{n}}) = {\text{g}}\left( {\text{n}} \right) + {\text{h}}\left( {\text{n}} \right) $$

where f(n) denotes the estimated path cost from S to G, g(n) denotes the actual path cost from S to the current node, and h(n) is the heuristic function which denotes the estimated path cost from the current node to G. The heuristic function is generally expressed as Manhattan distance, Diagonal distance, or Euclidean distance.

The traditional A* algorithm has the problem that search nodes are too many and calculation time is too long. And heuristic function h(n) has an important influence on the speed and accuracy of path planning. Only by choosing a suitable h(n) value can we get the optimal path. To solve the problem, this paper improves the calculation efficiency of the A* algorithm by weighting the heuristic function. Besides, in order to increase the practicality, the impact factors (road conditions) are introduced to the evaluation function.

Improvement of A* algorithm

Exponential weighting in the heuristic function

In extreme cases, when the heuristic function h(n) = 0, the priority of nodes will be determined by g(n), then the algorithm degenerates to dijkstra algorithm. If h(n) is always less than or equal to the cost from the current node to G, then A* algorithm guarantees that it can find the shortest path. But the smaller h(n) is, the more A* algorithm will traverse nodes, which will lead to the slower search. Therefore, the weighting of h(n) in the heuristic function should be increased. The exponential attenuation method was proposed for weighting by Wang et al. as shown in Eq. (2), and the improved search efficiency is further improved27.

$$ {\text{f}}({\text{n}}) = {\text{g}}\left( {\text{n}} \right) + \exp \left[ {{\text{h}}\left( {\text{n}} \right)} \right]\;*\;\left[ {{\text{h}}\left( {\text{n}} \right) + {\text{h}}\left( {\text{p}} \right)} \right] $$

where h(p) is the distance from the parent node of current node to the target node. exp[h(n)] is the weighting of the heuristic function.

Improvement of valuation function

It not only needs to quickly plan paths for tourists, but also needs to consider the road ups and downs in scenic areas to provide the best route for tourists to save time and effort. In this paper, the path planning for scenic spots is improved on the basis of Eq. (2). And the valuation function of A* algorithm needs to be modified accordingly. g(n) in the traditional A* algorithm is the total distance from the starting node S to the current node n. This paper introduces one impact factors (road condition level p(n)) to the evaluation function, The improved g(n) is as follows:

$$ {\text{g}}({\text{n}}) = \sum\limits_{{{\text{i}} = 1}}^{{\text{m}}} {{\text{p}}({\text{n}})} $$

where m represents the number of road sections passed from the starting node S to the current node n. p(n) can be set as linear functions f(x) = ax + b, where x represents the actual distance of the road28. For terrain with different road conditions, the terrain undulation can be set to r, and a can be calculated according to the calculation function (The calculation function is a = c*r + d). This paper set r = 30°, 45°, 60°; c = 0.2, d = 1, b = 1, and we can get Eq. (4) as follows:

$$ {\text{f}}_{{\text{p}}} {\text{(x) = (0}}{\text{.2r + 1)x + 1}} $$

From the above Equation (3), (4), we can obtain the Equation (5) as follows

$$ {\text{g}}({\text{n}}) = \sum\limits_{{{\text{i}} = 1}}^{{\text{m}}} {\left( {0.2{\text{r}} + 1} \right){\text{x}} + 1} $$

The heuristic function h(n) can be set by exponential weighting according to Eq. (3) and Eq. (6). The evaluation function of the improved A* algorithm can be expressed as follows:

$$ {\text{f}}({\text{n}}) = \sum\limits_{{{\text{i}} = 1}}^{{\text{m}}} {\left( {0.2{\text{r}} + 1} \right){\text{x}} + 1} + \exp \left[ {{\text{h}}\left( {\text{n}} \right)} \right]\;*\;\left[ {{\text{h}}\left( {\text{n}} \right) + {\text{h}}\left( {\text{p}} \right)} \right] $$

This paper uses two lists (Open list and Close list) to store the relevant node information. The Open list mainly saves the node information that has been generated but has not been accessed, while the Close list mainly saves the visited node information. The fake code for he improved A* algorithm is listed as follows:

The flow chart of the improved A* algorithm is shown in Fig. 1.

Figure 1
figure 1

Flow chart of improved A* algorithm.


Process of path planning

First, introduce the road condition level to construct a dynamic road network data model for scenic spots. Then, the heuristic function is improved by exponential weighting. Finally, the start and end points of path planning are determined, and the improved A* algorithm is used for path planning. The path planning process is shown in Fig. 2:

Figure 2
figure 2

Flow chart of path planning.

Simulation experiments

The side length of the square is 80 in Fig. 3, and it is divided into 80 × 80 grids. The simulation experiment of the path planning is done by MATLAB R2010b shown in Fig. 3 in the simulation map. Take the top left corner of the simulation map as the origin of the coordinates, and the start point is set to (1, 1) represented by a green point, and the end point is set to (62, 53) represented by a yellow point. Pink polygons indicate that road undulation angle is larger than 30°, and black polygons represent obstacles.

Figure 3
figure 3

Simulation map.

In order to verify the feasibility of the improved A* algorithm, we add dijkstra algorithm, A* algorithm for comparison and evaluate the optimization effect from three aspects: Number Of Nodes Traversed (NONT), Path Cost (PC), and Path Length (PL). Figures 4, 5 and 6 compare the effect of path planning, and Table 1 is the parameters comparison.

Figure 4
figure 4

Dijkstra algorithm.

Figure 5
figure 5

A* algorithm.

Figure 6
figure 6

Improved A* algorithm.

Table 1 Parameter comparision.

In Figs. 4, 5 and 6, the red area is the node area to be traversed by the algorithm, and the blue is the boundary of the traversed area, and the cyan is the path, and the purple is the area with a slope greater than 30.

The results presented in Table 1 shows that the improved A* algorithm can effectively reduce the calculation time and road cost. Compared to the traditional A* algorithm, although the improved A* algorithm increased the path length by 30.2%, it reduced the number of nodes traversed and path cost by 86.8% and 30.3% respectively. Compared to the dijkstra algorithm, it reduced the number of nodes traversed and path cost by 91.8% and 30.3% respectively.

Discussion and conclusion

In order to solve the problem that the A* algorithm ignores the road cost in path planning, this paper proposes a path planning method based on improved A* algorithm. Firstly, the heuristic function of the A* algorithm is weighted to improve the calculation efficiency. Secondly, in order to increase the practicality, the impact factors (road conditions) is introduced to the evaluation function. The feasibility of the improved A* algorithm is verified by comparing with dijkstra algorithm and traditional A* algorithms. Experimental results show that the improved A* algorithm can effectively reduce the calculation time and road cost.

Compared to the traditional A* algorithm and dijkstra algorithm, the improved A* algorithm achieves remarkable results, and it is more suitable for the path planning of Scenic spots. It can be seen that dijkstra algorithm and traditional A* algorithm both traverse a lot of nodes and ignore the road cost on finding the optimal path. Besides, as can be clearly seen from the Table 1, the number of traversed nodes decreases from 4631 to 381 nodes, on the other hand, the path cost decreases from 115 to 94. The improved A* algorithm is slightly stronger in real time and practicality.

In the simulation experiments, we assume that the environment is completely known, that is, obstacles, road conditions, start point and end point are custom-designed, so the simulation environment can't represent all the scenic environment. Accordingly, path planning research in unknown environments may be the next step of our research.

Moreover, impact factors, such as road conditions and the popularity of scenic spots, have not been statistically examined at present due to the difficulty in measuring and establishing the simulation environment of scenic spots. Terrain undulation is set to 30°, 45°, 60° and the popularity of scenic spots is set to 1, 1.5, 2 in this paper. However, there are a great many factors influencing path planning, and we only selectively discussed some common factors due to the restriction of data. Other factors, such as path's congestion, tourism emergency, move speed of tourists, are not included. This will be a focus of future research, and it should take different mode of dividing according to different scenic spots.

Compared to the dijkstra algorithm and traditional A* algorithm, although the improved A* algorithm reduced the number of nodes traversed and path cost effectively, the path length increased from 119 to 155. Therefore, it is suggested that the future work should be focused on reducing the path length of improved A* algorithm.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


  1. Gavalas, D., Kasapakis, V., Pantziou, G., Konstantopoulos, C. & Zaroliagis, C. Scenic athens: A personalized scenic route planner for tourists. In 2016 IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communication (2016).

  2. Karami, H., Anaraki, M. V., Farzin, S. & Mirjalili, S. Flow direction algorithm (FDA): A novel optimizer approach for solving optimization problems. Comput. Ind. Eng. 156(4), 107224 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang, D., Li, G., Zheng, K., Ming, X. C. & Pan, Z. H. An energy-balanced routing method based on forward-aware factor for wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf. 10, 766–773 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhang, J. D. et al. Vehicle routing in urban areas based on the oil consumption Weight-Dijkstra algorithm. IET Intell. Transp. Syst. 10, 495–502 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rosita, Y. D., Rosyida, E. E. & Rudiyanto, M. A. Implementation of Dijkstra algorithm and multi-criteria decision-making for optimal route distribution. Procedia Comput. Sci. 161, 378–385 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mohd Sabri, N. A., Hasan Basari, A. S., Hussin, B. & Abu Samah, K. A. F. Dijkstra-Ant colony optimization algorithm for shortest and safest evacuation in high rise building. J. Teknol. 79, 69–77 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dorigo, M., Maniezzo, V. & Colorni, A. Ant system: Optimization by a colony of cooperating agents. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man. Cybern. Part B IEEE Trans. Cybern. 26, 29–41 (1996).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhou, X. C., Yang, T. T., Liu, X. F. & Pan, Y. H. Intelligent logistics delivery path optimization method based on improved ant colony algorithm. J. Inner Mong. Norm. Univ. (Natl. Sci. Edn.). 46, 888–892 (2017).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Yu, Y. & Szeto, K. Y. Minimize the average mean first passage time of random walk in complex networks by genetic algorithm. In 2016 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (2016).

  10. Miao, C. W., Chen, G. Z., Yan, C. L. & Wu, L. L. Path planning optimization of indoor mobile robot based on adaptive ant colony algorithm. Comput. Ind. Eng. 156, 107230 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hsieh, T. H., Wang, S. Z., Gong, H. J., Liu, W. & Xu, N. Sea ice warning visualization and path planning for ice navigation based on radar image recognition. J. Mar. Sci. Tech. Taiw. 29, 277–286 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rakita, D., Mutlu, B. & Gleicher, M. Single-query path planning using sample-efficient probability informed trees. IEEE Robot. Autom. Let. 6, 4624–4631 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pan, F. Q. et al. Optimal route design for vehicle driving based on open blocks. J. Shenzhen Univ. (Sci. Eng.). 37, 143–150 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wu, P., Zhu, J. M. & Zhu, L. B. Research on tourism route design based on multi-objective planning and intelligent optimization algorithm. Math. Pract. Theory 46, 105–114 (2016).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang, S. S., Cai, Z. L. & Ren, F. An optimal path algorithm based on weighted hierarchical road network. Sci. Surv. Map. 40, 127–131 (2015).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Liu, C. G., Mao, Q. Z., Chu, X. M. & Xie, S. An improved A-star algorithm considering water current, traffic separation and berthing for vessel path planning. Appl. Sci. 9, 1057 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Uttendorf, S., Eilert, B. & Overmeyer, L. Combining a fuzzy inference system with an A* algorithm for the automated generation of roadmaps for Automated Guided Vehicles. Automatisierungstechnik 65, 189–197 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Das, P. K., Behera, H. S., Pradhan, S. K., Tripathy, H. K. & Jena, P. K. A Modified real time A* algorithm and its performance analysis for improved path planning of mobile robot. Comput. Intell. Data Min. 32, 221–234 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Shin, Y. W. et al. Near-optimal weather routing by using improved A* algorithm. Appl Sci. 10, 6010 (2020).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Alani, S., Baseel, A., Hamdi, M. M. & Rashid, S. A. A hybrid technique for single-source shortest path-based on A* algorithm and ant colony optimization. IJ-AI 9, 256–263 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pradhan, S., Krishna, P. R. & Rout, S. S. Wish-list based shopping path discovery and profitable path recommendations services in emerging markets. In 2012 Third International Conference on. IEEE Computer Society (2012).

  22. Pardines, I. & Lopez, V. Shop&Go: TSP heuristics for an optimal shopping with smartphones. Sci. China Inf. Sci. 56, 1–12 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ma, F., Yang, H., Gu, Q. & Meng, Y. Navigation path planning of unmanned underground LHD based on improved A* algorithm. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 46, 303–309 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Rahul, K., Anupam, S. & Ritu, T. Fusion of probabilistic A* algorithm and fuzzy inference system for robotic path planning. Artif. Intell. Rev. 33, 275–306 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Pal, A., Tiwari, R. & Shukla, A. Modified A* Algorithm for Mobile Robot Path Planning Vol. 395, 183–193 (Springer, Berlin, 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Guruji, A. K., Agarwal, H. & Parsediya, D. K. Time-efficient A* Algorithm for robot path planning. Procedia Technol. 23, 144–149 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang, W., Pei, D. & Feng, Z. The shortest path planning for mobile robots using improved A* algorithm. J. Comput. Appl. 38, 1523–1526 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Wang, C., et al. Path planning of automated guided vehicles based on improved A-Star algorithm. In IEEE International Conference on Information & Automation. 2071–2076 (2015).

Download references


This research was supported in part by the Key Scientific Research Project in Colleges and Universities of Henan Province of China under Grant 22A420004, in part by the Science and Technology Cooperation Project of Anshun University under Grant (LH[2017]7059), in part by the Cultivation Programme for Young Backbone Teachers in Henan University of Technology under Grant 21420070, and in part by the Key Projects of Science and Technology Research of Henan Province under Grant 202102310334.

Author information




X.W. completed the results and the manuscript. H.Z. completed the data collection and the implementation of the algorithm. S.L. completed the programming of the algorithm. J.W., Y.W. and D.S. completed the correction of the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haowei Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, X., Zhang, H., Liu, S. et al. Path planning of scenic spots based on improved A* algorithm. Sci Rep 12, 1320 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing