Abstract
There have been no report of objective clinical characteristics or prognostic factors that predict fatal outcome of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) since the Berlin definition was published. The aim of this study is to identify clinically available predictors that distinguish between two phenotypes of fatal ARDS due to pneumonia. In total, 104 cases of Japanese patients with pneumonia-induced ARDS were extracted from our prospectively collected database. Fatal cases were divided into early (< 7 days after diagnosis) and late (≥ 7 days) death groups, and clinical variables and prognostic factors were statistically evaluated. Of the 50 patients who died within 180 days, 18 (36%) and 32 (64%) were in the early (median 2 days, IQR [1, 5]) and late (median 16 days, IQR [13, 29]) death groups, respectively. According to multivariate regression analyses, the APACHE II score (HR 1.25, 95%CI 1.12–1.39, p < 0.001) and the disseminated intravascular coagulation score (HR 1.54, 95%CI 1.15–2.04, p = 0.003) were independent prognostic factors for early death. In contrast, late death was associated with high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) score indicating early fibroproliferation (HR 1.28, 95%CI 1.13–1.42, p < 0.001) as well as the disseminated intravascular coagulation score (HR 1.24, 95%CI 1.01–1.52, p = 0.039). The extent of fibroproliferation on HRCT, and the APACHE II scores along with coagulation abnormalities, should be considered for use in predictive enrichment and personalized medicine for patients with ARDS due to pneumonia.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) has diverse etiologies and various clinical courses1,2,3. Two clinical phenotypes of this syndrome have recently been described, namely, phenotype 1/uninflamed and phenotype 2/hyperinflammation, as evidenced by statistical extraction independent of clinical outcomes4,5. Phenotypes 1 and 2 account for approximately 65% and 35% of ARDS patients, respectively. The hyperinflammation phenotype is often caused by sepsis associated with shock and metabolic acidosis, resulting in significantly higher mortality with fewer ventilator-free days and organ failure-free days compared to those with the uninflamed phenotype. Previous studies of the causes and timing of death due to ARDS in the 1980s and 1990s have reported and classified fatal cases into early and late death and emphasized primary or secondary septic syndrome as a common cause of death6,7. Such categorization based on timing and cause of death can likely define subgroups within the uninflamed and hyperinflammatory clinical phenotypes. Overall, because of the clinical heterogeneity of ARDS, it is critical for clinicians to understand and recognize ARDS phenotypes, along with associated prognostic factors that contribute to various outcomes, to optimize the individual treatment of patients.
Severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is the most common cause of ARDS8. Additionally, ARDS due to pneumonia fulfilling the Berlin criteria concurrently satisfies the latest sepsis definition9. Thus, the intensity of systemic inflammation caused by pneumonia (pneumonia sepsis) in each patient possibly reflects the uninflamed and hyperinflammatory clinical phenotypes that may predict the clinical course and outcome.
Another viewpoint regarding the clinical characteristics of ARDS is based on lung pathology. For example, recent studies on the autopsy and biopsy of ARDS have reported that only half of patients who meet ARDS clinical criteria have diffuse alveolar damage (DAD) and that those with DAD had poorer outcomes than those without10,11,12,13. Furthermore, ARDS patients with DAD of pulmonary origin, including pneumonia, show more extensive pulmonary fibrosis at autopsy than do nonpulmonary ARDS patients, even with adjustment for the time interval from onset to death10. Additionally, we previously reported the clinical significance and prognostic value of high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) for the prediction of mortality or ventilator-associated outcomes associated with secondary septic syndrome in ARDS14,15.
With the goal of refining therapeutic strategies against each clinical course, the objective of our study was to clarify differences in the clinical course and relevant prognostic factors among patients with different clinical outcomes including early death, late death, or survived in pneumonia-associated ARDS. We hypothesized (1) early death is positively associated with the APACHE II score and (2) late death is positively associated with the high-resolution CT score indicating the extent of fibroproliferation, associated with ventilator-associated outcomes, and these scores can predict early and late death of ARDS due to pneumonia, respectively.
Methods
The detailed methods are described in the Online Supplementary Materials. Although this study was a retrospective, single-center study, the data were prospectively collected during an ongoing high-resolution CT (HRCT) study of patients with ARDS. Some of the study data have been published14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21.
Patients
A total of 210 cases of Japanese patients with ARDS diagnosis based on the international definition of ARDS were extracted from our HRCT database encompassing from October 1, 2004, to May 31, 2017. We reviewed data to determine whether individual cases that occurred prior to the 2012 publication of the Berlin definition4 met those diagnostic criteria. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients or their families. The study was approved by our institutional review board (Saiseikai Kumamoto Hospital Medical Ethics Committee, Permission number 238) and was conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the Declaration of Helsinki.
Patient outcomes were evaluated at 180 days after the diagnosis of ARDS and were classified into three types of prognoses; survived, early death (< 7 days after diagnosis), and late death (≥ 7 days). All patients underwent HRCT on the day of ARDS diagnosis. Exclusion criteria and the screening and enrollment flow are shown in Fig. 1.
Analysis in this study provided historical data to support a randomized, open-label multicenter phase II study evaluating the efficacy and safety of MultiStem cells [HLCM051], an allogeneic bone marrow-derived stem cell product, in patients with ARDS due to pneumonia (NCT03807804), that has been ongoing since February 2019.
Collected data
We collected the clinical data at the diagnosis of ARDS for the patient age, sex, comorbidities, severity of ARDS, McCabe scores, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) II scores, sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores, high-resolution CT scores (extent of fibroproliferation), high-resolution CT patterns, disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) scores, arterial oxygen tension (PaO2)/fractional inspired oxygen (FiO2), the extent of infiltration on chest X-ray and blood test findings. Ventilatory indexes such as PEEP, tidal volume, and peak inspiratory pressure were also collected in the groups (Table 1A, B).
Agreement of pathogen sensitivity with initial empiric antimicrobial agents
The identification of the detected bacteria or influenza virus antigen as pathogens of pneumonia was determined in conjunction with clinical information. A bacterial pathogen was determined to be present if gram-positive or gram-negative bacteria were detected in a blood sample, sputum, endotracheal aspirates, bronchoalveolar lavage specimen; if S. pneumoniae and Legionella pneumophila was detected in urine by means of antigen detection. A viral pathogen was determined to be present if influenza virus was detected in a nasopharyngeal swab by means of PCR assay.
Microbial etiologies in three types groups of prognoses were described in Table 2. The sensitivity to initial antimicrobial agents, and prior administration of antibiotics were also recorded in three groups. Except for cases immediately diagnosed based on urine antigens such as Streptococcus. pneumoniae and Legionella pneumophila or nasopharyngeal flu antigen, empiric antibiotics were selected per Japanese Respiratory Society guidelines for the management of respiratory infections22,23. When necessary, antimicrobials were adjusted according to the in vitro sensitivity of cultured pathogens. Pathogen sensitivity to initial empiric antimicrobials was graded as follows: sensitive, non-sensitive, and no bacteria detected. “No bacteria detected” was assigned when no significant pathogens were cultured.
Assessment of chest radiography and HRCT findings
The extent of chest radiography lung infiltration was scored by the Murray score24, as follows: 1-quadrant, 2-quadrants; 3-quadrants; and 4-quadrants. All patients underwent helical HRCT of the chest on the day of ARDS diagnosis using multidetector-row CT (MDCT). This study evaluated single HRCT scans acquired on the day of ARDS diagnosis because of the difficulty in obtaining sequential scans in patients receiving positive-pressure ventilation. The HRCT scans were independently evaluated by two experienced chest radiologists (T.J. and K.F.) who were unaware of the patients’ clinical condition.
Evaluation of HRCT patterns and HRCT score
The DAD pattern on HRCT is characterized by patchy ground-glass attenuation and/or air-space consolidation associated with bronchial dilation, reticular opacities, and cystic changes depending on the pathologic fibroproliferative phase of DAD according to the most recent international multidisciplinary consensus statement of idiopathic interstitial pneumonias24. Each patient’s HRCT scan was assigned one of three patterns (definite DAD pattern, possible DAD pattern, and inconsistent with DAD pattern), consistent with the international guideline (Supplement Figure 2). In addition, HRCT findings were graded a score of 1–6 based on the classification system correlating with previously described pathology25. The scoring system has been reported14,15,25.
Assignment of ventilator-associated outcomes
We reported that early fibroproliferation on HRCT scans at diagnosis of ARDS increased risk of prolonged ventilation, ventilator-associated pneumonia, and air leak syndrome, resulting in secondary sepsis syndrome15. To evaluate the relation between the HRCT scores and these ventilator-associated outcomes in patients with ARDS due to pneumonia, these outcomes were recorded; whether the patient was weaned from the ventilator within 28 days after the diagnosis; whether air leak syndrome defined as any pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum or subcutaneous emphysema was noted as present or absent on regular chest radiographs; whether diagnoses of culture-confirmed ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis or pneumonia requiring newly prescribed antibiotics were done.
Evaluation of coagulation and fibrinolytic abnormalities
Coagulation and fibrinolytic abnormalities at ARDS diagnosis were assessed by the disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) score criteria of the Japanese Association of Acute Medicine (JAAM)26.
Statistical analysis
Continuous variables expressed as medians and interquartile ranges (IQRs), and categorical variables in each three group (survived, early death and late death) are shown. The interobserver variation of the presence/absence of the HRCT findings was analyzed using the weighted kappa statistic and classified as follows: poor (kappa = 0–0.20), fair (kappa = 0.21–0.40), moderate (kappa = 0.41–0.60), substantial (kappa = 0.61–0.80), and almost perfect (kappa = 0.81–1.00). Interobserver variation regarding the extent of the HRCT findings was assessed by Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient, and the HRCT scores assigned by the two independent observers were compared using the Bland–Altman method (Supplementary Figure 3). If the HRCT patterns or the HRCT scores did not agree between the two radiologists, one of the patterns or the scores was adopted by consensus. Of the HRCT scores which were semiquantitative markers of fibroproliferation, and the three patterns on HRCT scan (definite DAD pattern, possible DAD pattern, and inconsistent with DAD pattern), which were qualitative indicators, the HRCT scores were adopted for multivariate analysis because of the results of our previous studies14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21. From our published studies14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21 as described in our study hypothesis, we built the model for multivariate analysis using age, the APACHE II score, the HRCT score, and the DIC score.
To evaluate whether the APACHE II score would be a prognostic factor of early death (< 7-day mortality), univariate and multivariate analyses using Cox proportional hazard models were performed among the two groups; early death group versus late death group plus survived one. Similarly, to assess whether the HRCT score would be predictive factors for the late death (from day 7 to day 180), univariate and multivariate analyses were done between the two groups; late death group versus survived one. We employed receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to examine the sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of the APACHE II score and HRCT score and identified the best cutoff value for each with Youden’s index. The relation among the HRCT scores and ventilator-related outcomes (weaning of ventilator within 28 days, air-leak syndrome, and ventilator-associated infection) were evaluated using Logistic regression analyses after adjusting age and severity of ARDS in the late death groups and survived one. For all analyses, a p-value less than 0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
Results
Of the 210 cases, 104 with a diagnosis of ARDS due to pneumonia were extracted from our database (Fig. 1). Patient demographics and severity characteristics are shown in Table 1. The results of microbial etiology, antimicrobial treatment and sensitivity to initial antimicrobial agents are shown in Table 2.
The timing and causes of death
The distribution of days from diagnosis to death in this study is depicted in Fig. 2. Fifty of 104 patients (48%) died during the 180-day study period, with 41 (82% of deaths) occurring within the first 28 days. Eighteen (36%) died less than 7 days following diagnosis (median, 2 days, IQR [1, 5]; early death group), and almost all deaths (88%) were due to sepsis syndrome associated with multiple organ failure or shock. Of 32 patients (64%) who died after ≥ 7 days (median, 16 days, IQR [13, 29]; late death group), 22 (68%) died of sepsis syndrome and 10 (32%) of irreversible respiratory failure.
Differences of clinical characteristics
There were distinct clinical features in the early and late death groups. The demographics and clinical characteristics of the patients in the three outcome groups (survivors, early deaths and late deaths) are summarized in Table 1A, B. In comparison among the groups (the early death group vs. the others; the late death group plus survived one) (Table 1A), the early death group had a more severe general condition, as reflected by APACHE II score (Early; median, 28 IQR [24, 31] vs. Others; median, 21 IQR [18, 25]), and more severe ARDS itself (Early; PaO2/FiO2 median, 74 IQR [64, 96] vs. Others: PaO2/FiO2 median, 110 IQR [79, 152]) than those in the others group. The early death group also had higher sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) (Early; median, 12 IQR [9, 14] vs. Others; median, 7 IQR [5, 10]) and the higher percentage of overt disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) with a DIC score of 4 or higher (Early; 67% vs. Others; 33%) than the others group. Conversely, compared between the late death group and survived one (Table 1B), the severity of fibroproliferation, as evidenced by the extent of areas with traction bronchiectasis (contributing to high HRCT scores), was higher in the late death group (median, 254; IQR [212, 314]) than in the survived one (median, 193; IQR [170, 221]).
Pneumonia microbial pathogens were identified in 70% of patients (Table 2), and pathogens were identified most frequently in the early death group (83%) and least frequently in the late death group (47%). Prior administration of antimicrobial agents at referring hospitals was significantly more frequent common in the late death group (56%) than in the early death group (33%) and survivors (28%). Similarly, cases where no bacteria were detected in culture, were more frequent in the late death group (53%) than in the other two groups. S. pneumonia was the most frequent pathogen isolated (41% of all cases) and tended to be the major bacterium causing early death (50%).
Difference in high-resolution CT features
There was substantial agreement (weighted kappa 0.78) between the 2 experts’ evaluations of HRCT findings. The agreement between the 2 observers was also good in assessing the extent of the lung field lesions (rs = 0.83, p < 0.001). The consistency of HRCT scores between the 2 observers is shown in Bland–Altman plots, with 95% limits of agreement (Supplement Figure 2). For all patients, HRCT patterns were assessed as definite (56%), possible (15%), or inconsistent with DAD (29%). A definite DAD pattern was most frequent (67%) in the late death group. Nevertheless, inconsistency in the DAD pattern was observed in 61% of the patients who died early.
Prognostic implications
Predictor of early death
In comparison among the groups (the early death vs. the late death plus survived one), the APACHE II score (HR 1.25, 95% CI 1.12–1.39, p < 0.001) and the DIC score (HR 1.54, 95%CI 1.15–2.04, p = 0.003) were independently associated with early death (< 7 days) based on multivariate regression analysis (Table 3). In addition, ROC curve analysis showed that an APACHE II score of 27 was appropriate for the prediction of early death, with 67% sensitivity and 84% specificity (AUC, 0.79; 95%CI, 0.68–0.91) (Supplementary Figure 1).
Predictor of late death
Multivariate regression analysis after adjusting for characteristics showed that the HRCT score (HR 1.28, 95%CI 1.13–1.42, p < 0.001) as well as the DIC score (HR 1.24, 95%CI 1.01–1.52, p = 0.039) was independently associated with late death (Table 3). The ROC curve yielded an optimal cutoff value of 211 for the HRCT score, which was determined by the Youden Index to predict death from day 7 to day 180, with 81% sensitivity and 67% specificity (AUC, 0.77; 95%CI, 0.67–0.87) (Fig. 3A). The mortality rate of patients with HRCT scores lower than 211 was in the 20% range for each time point; those with an HRCT score of 211 or higher had a mortality rate in the 60% range (Fig. 3B).
Predictors of ventilator-associated outcomes
In our adjusted analysis, the HRCT score was independently associated with ventilator weaning within 28 days after diagnosis (OR 0.98, 95%CI 0.97–0.99, p < 0.001), the onset of air-leak syndrome (OR 1.02, 95%CI 1.00–1.04, p = 0.02), and the antibiotic-treated ventilator-associated infection (OR 1.01, 95%CI 1.0–1.02, p = 0.029).
Discussion
We demonstrate here the distinct differences and prognostic factors in the early and the late death groups and clarified two clinical phenotypes among fatal cases in our patients with ARDS due to pneumonia. Early death accounted for 36% of all deaths, and these patients experienced a more severe general condition caused by the so-called “cytokine storm”, which was evidenced by higher APACHE II, SOFA, and DIC scores as well as higher disease severity despite less extensive radiological features. Conversely, patients who died late accounted for 64% of deaths; these patients were characterized by more extensive radiographic infiltration and more severe lung fibroproliferation on HRCT scans and typically experienced prolonged mechanical ventilation followed by secondary multiple organ failure. We also report here for the first time the radiological differences as well as other clinical differences in the two groups of fatal cases. Similar to our study, previous studies of the causes and timing of death among ARDS cases from the 1980s and 1990s showed that fatal cases could be classified into early (< 72 h after diagnosis) and late (> 72 h) death, emphasizing the common cause of death as sepsis syndrome6,7. However, our data suggest that different processes are involved in sepsis syndrome-induced death early and late. In contrast, approximately 90% of patients who died early succumbed to primary sepsis syndrome, which was also the cause of ARDS itself, whereas 60% of those who died late had secondary sepsis syndrome following prolonged mechanical ventilation. Recently, ARDS has been classified into two clinical phenotypes by using latent class analysis: uninflamed (phenotype 1) and hyperinflammation (phenotype 2)4,5. Although personalized medicine for ARDS would be expected according to the phenotype5, two phenotypes from among our fatal cases may be subgroups of phenotypes 1 and 2.
We report that evidence of early fibroproliferation based on HRCT scans at diagnosis is independently associated with ventilator-associated outcomes and subsequent multiple organ failure, as well as refractory respiratory failure14,15. In a prospective cohort study evaluating 159 autopsied lungs from ARDS patients, Thille et al.10 described that early fibroproliferation occurred within one week and fibrosis one week later. Interestingly, fibrosis was found to be more frequent in ARDS of pulmonary origin than in ARDS of other origins. As ARDS in our study was caused by pneumonia, early progression of lung fibroproliferation evaluated by HRCT score was the most relevant risk factor for late death and was considered the most crucial.
A new frontier in ARDS clinical trials involving phenotyping of patients before randomization has been proposed. Personalized mechanical ventilation tailored to the type of CT pattern of the patient (focal or nonfocal) has already been reported in this field27. This study was undertaken to plan the study design for a randomized, open-label multicenter phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of MultiStem cells [HLCM051], an allogeneic bone marrow-derived stem cell product, in patients with ARDS due to pneumonia (NCT03807804). Using the cutoff value of APACHE II score ≥ 27, patients who are likely to die of severe systemic organ failure in a few days without confirming the effect of the investigational new drug would be excluded. On the other hand, patients who are at a high risk of progressive pulmonary fibroproliferation associated with secondary septic syndrome and could hardly be rescued by any conventional treatment were identified by using HRCT score ≥ 211.
Coagulation and fibrinolytic abnormalities that result in DIC and excessive systemic inflammation lead to multiple organ failure28. Although these abnormalities have to date garnered relatively little attention among ARDS researchers18,20, there is emerging concern about these abnormalities, as coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is reported to evoke prominent coagulopathy associated with an increased risk of death29. Because the DIC score was an independent prognostic factor both for early and late death, a new assessment of these abnormalities may be necessary in patients with ARDS caused by other pneumonia pathogens as well as severe acute respiratory syndrome due to coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).
Recent studies have indicated that approximately one-half of patients with ARDS who meet the Berlin definition exhibit DAD and that the prognosis of those with DAD is inferior to that of those without DAD12,13. In our study, the definite DAD pattern was most frequently observed in the late death group, whereas the inconsistent DAD pattern significantly was predominant in the early death group. Based on 36 autopsy cases of ARDS due to pneumonia, Sarmiento et al.30 reported that pathological alterations in DAD were detected in less than 50% of patients who died within six days. The distinct difference in HRCT findings between the early- and late-death groups may reflect a difference in the underlying pathology. In general, it is critical to identify DAD without using invasive procedures31. Further research is needed to evaluate the relationship between the HRCT patterns and prognosis.
In a study of 432 patients requiring mechanical ventilation for severe CAP, including 125 (29%) cases of ARDS, multivariate logistic regression analyses showed previous antibiotic use and inadequate antibiotic therapy to be independently associated with 30-day mortality8. In our study, “previous antibiotic use” and “no bacteria detected in culture” were more frequent in the late death group. It has been reported that a duration of antibiotic therapy of over 24 h may lead to reduced sensitivity in the detection of significant pathogens32. Hence, the longer use of broad-spectrum antibiotics without de-escalation according to the sensitivity of cultured pathogens might have resulted in antibiotic-treated ventilator-associated infection, which was most often observed in the late death group.
Our study has several limitations. First, it was a retrospective evaluation using a prospectively collected dataset. Compared with a typical retrospective design, however, our study is strengthened by the use of a prospectively enrolled cohort including prospective identification of acute respiratory failure as suspected ARDS. Second, this study included a relatively small number of patients and was conducted at a single center, which necessitates cautious extrapolation of the findings to other settings. Although we have previously reported the critical utility of HRCT findings and scoring and the prognostic value of the DIC score for the care of ARDS patients19,20, CT findings and coagulative and fibrinolytic abnormalities have only recently gained more widespread consideration during the current pandemic of COVID-19-associated severe acute respiratory syndrome. Third, the long period of recruitment (14 years) may have affected patient care. Despite introducing advances in ventilatory management33 and other supportive care over time, fundamental management, including a lung-protective ventilation strategy, did not change during our cohort. Finally, except for influenza viruses, respiratory viruses were not routinely identified because of limitations in diagnostic techniques during the study period. In cases for which no significant pathogen was identified, these patients might have been infected with other respiratory viruses, and even if these viruses were involved in the disease, only supportive care could be taken in addition to lung-protective ventilation.
Conclusions
There are distinct differences in the clinical course and relevant prognostic factors among patients with different clinical outcomes including early death, late death, or survived in pneumonia-associated ARDS. Early death is positively associated with the APACHE II score indicating of the severity of the general condition characterized by cytokine storms, and late death is positively associated with the high-resolution CT score suggesting the early fibroproliferation, associated with higher risk of ventilator related outcomes. These scores can predict early and late death of ARDS due to pneumonia, respectively.
Systemic severity, the extent of early fibroproliferation on HRCT scans, and coagulation abnormalities should be taken into consideration in personalized medicine for ARDS caused by pneumonia.
Data availability
Yes. The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Abbreviations
- ARDS:
-
Acute respiratory distress syndrome
- DAD:
-
Diffuse alveolar damage
- APACHE:
-
Acute physiology and chronic health evaluation
- HRCT:
-
High-resolution computed tomography
- IQR:
-
Interquartile range
- PBW:
-
Predicted body weight
- PEEP:
-
Positive end-expiratory pressure
- PIP:
-
Peak inspiratory pressure
- SOFA:
-
Sequential organ failure assessment
- VT :
-
Tidal volume
References
ARDS Definition Task Force et al. Acute respiratory distress syndrome: The Berlin definition. JAMA 307, 2526–2533 (2012).
Ashbaugh, D. G., Bigelow, D. B., Petty, T. L. & Levine, B. E. Acute respiratory distress in adults. Lancet 2, 319–323 (1967).
Bernard, G. R. et al. The American–European Consensus conference on ARDS. Definitions, mechanisms, relevant outcomes, and clinical trial coordination. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 149, 818–824 (1994).
Calfee, C. S. et al. Subphenotypes in acute respiratory distress syndrome: Latent class analysis of data from two randomized controlled trials. Lancet Respir. Med. 2, 611–620 (2014).
Reilly, J. P., Calfee, C. S. & Christie, J. D. Acute respiratory distress syndrome phenotypes. Semin. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 40, 19–30 (2019).
Montgomery, B. A., Stager, M. A., Carrico, J. C. & Hudson, L. D. Causes of mortality in patients with the adult respiratory distress syndrome. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 132, 485–489 (1985).
Stapleton, R. D. et al. Causes and timing of death in patients with ARDS. Chest 128, 525–532 (2005).
Cilloniz, C. et al. Acute respiratory distress syndrome in mechanically ventilated patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Eur. Respir. J. 51, 1702215. https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.02215-2017 (2018).
Singer, M. et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock. JAMA 315(8), 801–810. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.0287 (2016).
Thille, A. W. et al. Chronology of histological lesions in acute respiratory distress syndrome with diffuse alveolar damage: A prospective cohort study of clinical autopsies. Lancet Respir. Med. 1(5), 395–401 (2013).
Guerin, C. et al. Open lung biopsy in nonresolving ARDS frequently identifies diffuse alveolar damage regardless of the severity stage and may have implications for patient management. Intensive Care Med. 41(2), 222–230 (2015).
Cardinal-Fernández, P., Lorente, J. A., Ballén-Barragán, A. & Matute-Bello, G. Acute respiratory distress syndrome and diffuse alveolar damage. New insights on a complex relationship. Ann. Am. Thorac. Soc. 14(6), 844–850 (2017).
Cardinal-Fernández, P. et al. The presence of diffuse alveolar damage on open lung biopsy is associated with mortality in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Chest 149(5), 1155–1164 (2016).
Ichikado, K. et al. Prediction of prognosis for acute respiratory distress syndrome with thin-section CT: Validation in 44 cases. Radiology 238, 321–329 (2006).
Ichikado, K. et al. Fibroproliferative changes on high-resolution CT in the acute respiratory distress syndrome predict mortality and ventilator dependency: A prospective observational cohort study. BMJ Open 2, e000545 (2012).
Kawamura, K. et al. Efficacy of azithromycin in sepsis-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome: A retrospective study and propensity score analysis. Springerplus 5(1), 1193. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2866-1.eCollection2016 (2016).
Takaki, M., Ichikado, K., Kawamura, K., Gushima, Y. & Suga, M. The negative effect of initial high-dose methylprednisolone and tapering regimen for acute respiratory distress syndrome: A retrospective propensity matched cohort study. Crit. Care 21(1), 135. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-017-1723-0 (2017).
Anan, K. et al. Clinical characteristics and prognosis of drug-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome compared with non-drug-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome: A single-centre retrospective study in Japan. BMJ Open 7(11), e015330. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015330 (2017).
Kawamura, K. et al. Adjunctive therapy with azithromycin for moderate and severe acute respiratory distress syndrome: A retrospective, propensity score-matching analysis of prospectively collected data at a single center. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 51(6), 918–924 (2018).
Anan, K., Kawamura, K., Suga, M. & Ichikado, K. Clinical difference between pulmonary and extrapulmonary acute respiratory distress syndrome: A retrospective cohort study of prospectively collected data in Japan. J. Thorac. Dis. 10(10), 5796–5803 (2018).
Anan, K. et al. A scoring system with high-resolution computed tomography to predict drug-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome: Development and internal validation. Sci. Rep. 9(1), 8601. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-45063-9 (2019).
Yanagihara, K., Kohno, S. & Matsushima, T. Japanese Guidelines for the management of community-acquired pneumonia. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 18(Suppl 1), S45–S48 (2001).
Miyashita, N., Matsushima, T., Oka, M. & Japanese Respiratory Society. The JRS guidelines for the management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults: An update and new recommendations. Intern. Med. 45(7), 419–428 (2006).
Travis, W. D. et al. An official American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society Statement: Update of the international multidisciplinary classification of the idiopathic interstitial pneumonias. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 188(6), 733–748 (2013).
Ichikado, K. et al. Acute interstitial pneumonia: Comparison of high-resolution computed tomography findings between survivors and nonsurvivors. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 165(11), 1551–1556 (2002).
Gando, S. et al. A multicenter, prospective validation of disseminated intravascular coagulation diagnostic criteria for critically ill patients: Comparing current criteria. Crit. Care Med. 34, 625–631 (2006).
Constantin, J. M. et al. Personalized mechanical ventilation tailored to lung morphology versus low positive end-expiratory pressure for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome in France (the LIVE study): A multicenter, single-blind, randomized control trial. Lancet Respir. Med. 7, 870–880 (2019).
Gando, S. Microvascular thrombosis and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. Crit. Care Med. 38, S35–S42 (2010).
Tachil, J. et al. ISTH interim guidance on recognition and management of coagulopathy in COVID-19. J. Thromb. Haemost. 18(5), 1023–1026 (2020).
Sarmiento, X. et al. Discrepancy between clinical criteria for diagnosing acute respiratory distress syndrome secondary to community-acquired pneumonia with autopsy findings of diffuse alveolar damage. Respir. Med. 105, 1170–1175 (2011).
Thille, A. W. et al. Predictors of diffuse alveolar damage in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: A retrospective analysis of clinical autopsies. Crit. Care 21(1), 254 (2017).
Musher, D. M., Montoya, R. & Wanahita, A. Diagnostic value of microscopic examination of Gram-stained sputum and sputum cultures in patients with bacteremic pneumococcal pneumonia. Clin. Infect. Dis. 39, 165–169 (2004).
Brower, R. G. et al. Ventilation 22. with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N. Engl. J. Med. 342, 1301–1308 (2000).
Acknowledgements
The authors are thankful to Masanori Sawada, MD, PhD, Mr. Tetsuya Oe, and Mr. Michiya Ono in the HEALIOS K.K. (Tokyo, Japan), and Anthony Ting, PhD and Eric Jenkins, MD at Athersys, Inc. (Cleveland, OH, USA) for editorial assistance.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
K.I., K.K., T.J., K.F., A.S., S.H., Y.E., Y.Y., K.A., N.S., Y.S., J.H., T.N., M.I., Y.S., K.Ni., K.Na., M.S., H.I., and T.S. were all involved with study conception, and conduct, data analysis, and drafting or revision of the manuscript. Each author is accountable for the accuracy and integrity of the research output.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Ichikado, K., Kawamura, K., Johkoh, T. et al. Clinical phenotypes from fatal cases of acute respiratory distress syndrome caused by pneumonia. Sci Rep 11, 20051 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-99540-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-99540-1
This article is cited by
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.