Abstract
Pv11 is an insect cell line established from the midge Polypedilum vanderplanki, whose larval form exhibits an extreme desiccation tolerance known as anhydrobiosis. Pv11 itself is also capable of anhydrobiosis, which is induced by trehalose treatment. Here we report the successful construction of a genome editing system for Pv11 cells and its application to the identification of signaling pathways involved in anhydrobiosis. Using the Cas9-mediated gene knock-in system, we established Pv11 cells that stably expressed GCaMP3 to monitor intracellular Ca2+ mobilization. Intriguingly, trehalose treatment evoked a transient increase in cytosolic Ca2+ concentration, and further experiments revealed that the calmodulin–calcineurin–NFAT pathway contributes to tolerance of trehalose treatment as well as desiccation tolerance, while the calmodulin–calmodulin kinase–CREB pathway conferred only desiccation tolerance on Pv11 cells. Thus, our results show a critical contribution of the trehalose-induced Ca2+ surge to anhydrobiosis and demonstrate temporally different roles for each signaling pathway.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Anhydrobiosis is the striking ability of some organisms to survive extreme desiccation. To date, among known anhydrobiotic animals, the sleeping chironomid Polypedilum vanderplanki is the only species from which culturable cell lines have been established1,2. The cell line, Pv11, derived from embryos of the midge, recapitulates the extreme desiccation tolerance of P. vanderplanki larvae3. Thus, Pv11 cells are a promising model for investigating the molecular mechanisms of anhydrobiosis in P. vanderplanki. However, a major experimental limitation has been that only a limited number of gene engineering tools are available in Pv11 cells4,5.
Larvae of P. vanderplanki inhabit temporary rock pools in semi-arid regions of sub-Saharan Africa6. During the drought season, these rock pools completely dry up and consequently any larvae they contain are also dehydrated. During this process, the larvae sense the onset of desiccation and start to synthesize large quantities of the disaccharide trehalose in the fat body tissues. Trehalose is then distributed throughout the whole larval body and protects biological molecules from desiccation damage by replacing intracellular water with a biological glass6. Over the last few decades, physiological studies, and more recently genomics and metabolomics approaches, have revealed the metabolic processes and genes involved in anhydrobiosis6,7.
To induce anhydrobiosis in Pv11 cells, pre-treatment with highly concentrated trehalose is necessary3. Such high concentrations of trehalose are generally cytotoxic to insect cell lines3, but Pv11 cells do not die; instead, they are induced to undergo anhydrobiosis. During this pre-treatment, Pv11 cells take up trehalose for the protection of intracellular biological molecules against desiccation. In addition, trehalose treatment changes gene expression profiles in Pv11 cells8,9, suggesting that trehalose is also a signal that regulates gene expression. However, the exact mechanisms of anhydrobiosis in Pv11 cells and how they regulate gene expression during trehalose treatment have yet to be elucidated.
The CRISPR/Cas9 system is a versatile technology for genome editing due to its ease of use and accuracy, and its successful application to a wide range of species10. Basically, the system is composed of two molecules, Cas9 nuclease and a guide RNA (gRNA), which form a complex that makes a double strand break (DSB) at a target DNA site. When DNA fragments that are identical (or very similar) to sequences around the DSB are present, this exogenous DNA is efficiently inserted into the DSB site by intrinsic DNA repair mechanisms11,12. This knock-in technology has been used in various species including non-model organisms13,14,15,16. If a CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing system can be developed for Pv11 cells, it should improve the experimental feasibility of exogenous gene expression and lead to the unravelling of the molecular details of anhydrobiosis in P. vanderplanki.
Genetically encoded fluorescent sensors are widely used to visualize molecular events and the mobilization of signaling molecules in living cells17. Intracellular Ca2+ mobilization is frequently analyzed with genetically encoded calcium indicators (GECIs), which were the first fluorescent sensors of this type to be developed. Since their development, GECIs have been improved by many researchers18, and are ideal for identifying biological factors that cause intracellular Ca2+ changes and activation of Ca2+ signaling pathways19,20,21,22,23. Given that Ca2+ signaling pathways are activated in response to various stresses, including oxidative stress24,25, heat shock26, osmotic stress27, and ER stress28,29, GECIs should provide clear information on the involvement of Ca2+ signaling pathways in anhydrobiosis in Pv11 cells.
Ca2+ is an intracellular second messenger that regulates a large number of biological processes via signaling pathways and the modulation of gene expression30,31. The key Ca2+-dependent signaling pathways are calmodulin (CaM)–calcineurin (CaN)–nuclear factor of activated T-cells (NFAT) and CaM–Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase (CaMK)–calcium/cAMP response element binding protein (CREB). CaM is a Ca2+ binding protein that transduces a change in intracellular Ca2+ concentration into molecular signals. CaN is a phosphatase activated by Ca2+/CaM complexes, which in turn dephosphorylates and activates NFAT. Activated NFAT binds to the consensus DNA sequence, TTTCCA, and regulates transcription of any downstream genes32. Ca2+/CaM complex-activated CaMK phosphorylates CREB, which binds to the canonical CRE sequence, TGACGT, and regulates downstream gene expression33. The signaling pathways are conserved in many cell types30,34,35,36 and across species37,38,39,40, and are activated by many stimuli24,25,26,27,28,29. Therefore, we hypothesized that Ca2+ signaling pathways may contribute to the induction of anhydrobiosis in P. vanderplanki.
Here we describe the development of a CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing system for Pv11 cells and its application to the identification of signaling pathways required for anhydrobiosis. Using the Cas9-mediated gene knock-in system, exogenous genes were inserted into a target site and constitutively expressed without affecting anhydrobiosis. We applied the gene knock-in method to visualize the mobilization of the second messenger, Ca2+, by knocking in the gene for the GECI, GCaMP3. Significantly, trehalose treatment evoked a transient increase in cytosolic Ca2+ concentration in Pv11 cells, and inhibition of Ca2+ signaling pathways during trehalose treatment decreased the cell survival rate after rehydration. Inhibitor experiments further indicated that the CaM–CaN–NFAT pathway conferred tolerance to trehalose treatment as well as desiccation tolerance on Pv11 cells, while the CaM–CaMK–CREB pathway conferred only desiccation tolerance. These results show the critical contribution of the trehalose-induced Ca2+ surge to anhydrobiosis and emphasise the distinct roles of the two signaling pathways.
Results
Utility of the CRISPR/Cas9 system in Pv11 cells
First, to examine whether the CRISPR/Cas9 system would work in Pv11 cells, the Cas9-expression vector and synthetic gRNAs targeting AcGFP1 genes were transfected into Pv11-KH cells; this Pv11-derived cell line stably expresses a transfected AcGFP1 construct4 (Fig. S1). After 4 weeks, images of the cells were acquired (Fig. S1a), and flow cytometric analysis was carried out, showing that AcGFP1 fluorescence was lost in about 30% of cells (Fig. S1b). GFP-negative cells were sorted, and the sequence of the AcGFP1 gene in the genome of these cells was analyzed. As shown in Fig. S1c,d, insertion or deletion (indel) mutations were found both in gRNA#1- and #3-transfected cells (Fig. S1c,d). Together, these data show that the CRISPR/Cas9 system can cause targeted indel mutations in Pv11 cells.
Construction of functional gRNA-expression vectors for Pv11 cells
To construct gRNA-expression vectors for Pv11 cells, the promoter region of the PvU6b gene was cloned (Supplementary Data 1). To overcome the experimental limitation that U6 promoters generally initiate transcription at G or A41,42,43, DmtRNA sequence was added at the + 1 position of the PvU6b promoter as described in the tRNA-flanked gRNA expression system44,45 (Supplementary Data 1). The gRNA- and Cas9-expression vectors were transfected into Pv11-KH cells, and after 4 weeks, cell images and flow cytometric data were acquired (Figs. S2a,b). As in the case of the synthetic gRNAs (Fig. S2), AcGFP1 fluorescence was lost in about 30% of the cells transfected with both Cas9- and gRNA-expression vectors (Fig. S2b). Again, indel mutations were found in the fluorescence-negative cells (Fig. S2c,d).
CRISPR/Cas9-mediated targeted knock-in for exogenous gene expression
Targeted knock-in for exogenous gene expression is one of the most useful applications of the CRISPR/Cas9 system. To develop the knock-in technique in Pv11 cells, we tried the PITCh (Precise Integration of Target Chromosome) method11 and selected the Pv.00443 gene as the insertion site because its expression is constitutively high under the regulation of a strong constitutive promoter, the 121 promoter, in Pv11 cells5. To exploit the endogenous constitutive expression system, we designed the gRNA to target the 5′-flanking site of the stop codon of Pv.00443, and then constructed a donor vector for the polycistronic expression of three genes: Pv.00443, AcGFP1 and the zeocin resistance gene (ZeoR; Fig. 1a and Supplementary Data 2).
The Cas9- and gRNA-expression vectors plus the donor vector were transfected into Pv11 cells, and the cells were treated with zeocin. After zeocin selection, single-cell sorting for AcGFP1 fluorescence was performed, and the sorted cell was grown on a feeder layer of intact Pv11 cells for 2 weeks. Zeocin treatment and sorting were carried out again to remove the feeder cells. Genomic DNA was extracted from the surviving, sorted cells and subjected to PCR using primers flanking the inserted DNA (Fig. 1b). As shown in Fig. 1c and Fig. S3, only a single 1840 bp-band was detected in the modified cells, which means that biallelic integration of the donor construct occurred (Fig. 1a,c and Fig. S3). Furthermore, sequencing of the band confirmed a precise gene knock-in in the target cells (Supplementary Data 3). The established cell line was named AcGFP1-KI.
As mentioned above, the Pv11-KH cell line was established by random integration of an AcGFP1 expression construct4. Pv11-KH cells exhibited a lower desiccation tolerance compared to intact Pv11 cells, perhaps due to unintended disruption of desiccation-related genes by genomic insertion of exogenous DNA fragments46,47, as previously noted4 and shown in Fig. 1d (Fig. 1d). To assess whether there was an advantage of the targeted knock-in system over the random integration of transfected DNA, the survival rate after a desiccation-rehydration cycle was compared in two different AcGFP1-expressing cell lines, AcGFP1-KI and Pv11-KH. As shown in Fig. 1d, there was no significant difference in the survival rate between intact Pv11 and AcGFP1-KI cells, while the survival rate of Pv11-KH cells was significantly lower than the other two cell lines (p = 0.0008 for Pv11 and 0.0003 for AcGFP1-KI; Fig. 1d). This result clearly shows that the targeted knock-in into the 5′-flanking site of the stop codon of Pv.00443 caused no deleterious effect on the anhydrobiotic ability of Pv11 cells.
To test whether different donor DNAs could be inserted into each of the two Pv.00443 alleles simultaneously, the HaloTag and hygromycin resistance (HygR) genes were individually cloned into a donor vector and transfected with the Cas9- and gRNA-expression vectors into Pv11 cells (Fig. S4a). After hygromycin treatment, single-cell sorting was performed by staining with HaloTag fluorescent ligand, and the sorted cells were grown with intact Pv11 cells as a feeder layer for 2 weeks. Hygromycin treatment and sorting were carried out again to remove feeder cells, and cell images were acquired (Fig. S4b). The genome of the cells was extracted and subjected to genomic PCR using primers flanking the inserted DNA. As shown in Fig. S4c, 1139 bp- and 1280-bp bands were detected, suggesting genomic insertion of both the HaloTag and HygR genes, respectively, had occurred (Fig. S4c). Furthermore, sequencing of the PCR bands confirmed precise gene knock-in of both genes in Pv11 cells (Supplementary Data 4 and 5). These results indicate the successful knock-in of a different donor DNA into each Pv.00443 allele of homologous chromosomes. This experiment also demonstrates that both inserted genes are haplosufficient, i.e. a single copy of each exogenous gene gives sufficient protein expression for the desired phenotype. Again, there was no significant difference in the anhydrobiotic survival rate of intact Pv11 and the HaloTag/HygR-KI cells (p = 0.8929, Fig. S4d).
Establishment of GCaMP3-KI cells
To use the genome editing technique to investigate signaling mechanisms involved in anhydrobiosis, we attempted to knock-in the GCaMP3 gene, which is one of GECIs used in a wide range of cell types20, including insect cells48,49. As shown in Fig. 2a, the Cas9- and gRNA-expression vectors plus two different donor vectors harboring GCaMP3 and ZeoR were transfected into Pv11 cells (Fig. 2a). To select cells expressing both genes, zeocin treatment and subsequent single cell sorting were performed (Fig. S5). We identified a clonal cell line that exhibited strong GCaMP3 fluorescence after treatment with the calcium ionophore, ionomycin, compared to DMSO (Fig. 2b). The genome of the cells was extracted, and subsequent genomic PCR showed both 2035 bp- and 1057 bp-bands, suggesting precise GCaMP3- and ZeoR-knock-in, respectively (Fig. 2c and Fig. S6), which was confirmed by sequencing of the PCR bands (Supplementary Data 6 and 7). Furthermore, the desiccation tolerance of the modified cell line, which we named GCaMP3-KI, was not affected (p = 0.1083; Fig. 2d).
Intracellular Ca2+ levels during trehalose treatment
Using the GCaMP3-containing cell line, we examined whether the intracellular Ca2+ concentration changed in Pv11 cells in response to trehalose treatment, which is known to alter the expression pattern of desiccation-related genes8. GCaMP3-KI cells were treated with trehalose, and their fluorescence was monitored. As shown in Fig. 3a, Fig. S7 and Fig. S8, trehalose treatment induced a transient increase in GCaMP3 fluorescence in GCaMP3-KI cells (Fig. 3a, Fig. S7 and Fig. S8), while ionomycin treatment stably increased GCaMP3 fluorescence (Fig. S9). Quantitative analysis of GCaMP3 fluorescence showed a 236-fold increase at 0.1 min after trehalose treatment, after which the fluorescent intensity returned to the basal level within 5 min (Fig. 3b and Fig. S10).
Contribution of calcium signaling pathways to desiccation tolerance
To examine the effect of the above cytosolic calcium surge on desiccation tolerance, Pv11 cells were treated with inhibitors against the major calcium signaling pathways during the desiccation-rehydration process (Fig. S11a). First, we determined inhibitor concentrations that had no deleterious effect on the cell survival rate during growth in normal culture medium, IPL-41 (Fig. S11b,c, and Fig. 4a–g, and Supplementary Table 1). At these same concentrations, the CaM inhibitors, W7 and calmidazolium, the CaN inhibitors, FK-506 and cyclosporin A, and the NFAT inhibitor, INCA-650, all decreased the survival rate after 48 h-treatment with trehalose (Fig. 4a–c,f), while the CaMK inhibitors, KN-93 and STO-609, and the CREB inhibitor, 666-1551, did not have such an effect (Fig. 4d,e,g). However, all inhibitors decreased the survival rate after rehydration (Fig. 4a–g). These results demonstrate the following: (i) activation of both calcium signaling pathways is probably necessary for the establishment of desiccation tolerance in Pv11 cells, (ii) the CaM–CaN–NFAT pathway confers tolerance to trehalose treatment on Pv11 cells as well as desiccation tolerance.
Gene ontology analysis of genes potentially regulated by NFAT and CREB
To evaluate functional differences between the two calcium signaling pathways, we performed a gene ontology (GO) analysis of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) that responded to trehalose treatment9 and had NFAT or CREB binding sequences in their promoter regions. Based on the fact that intracellular Ca2+ concentration is rapidly elevated by trehalose treatment (Fig. 3 and Fig. S8), any corresponding signal activation and gene regulation should occur during the early stages of the induction of anhydrobiosis by trehalose treatment. Therefore, we selected the shortest timepoint (12 h) from published RNA-seq data on the effect of trehalose treatment on Pv11 cells9 (accession number DRA008948). As shown in Fig. 5a, 1274 upregulated and 1094 downregulated DEGs in this dataset were potentially NFAT-regulated, while 124 upregulated and 109 downregulated DEGs were potentially CREB-regulated (DESeq2, FDR < 0.05; Fig. 5a and Supplementary Data 16).
GO analysis was performed on these DEGs and the data was summarized with REVIGO, based on semantic similarity (Fig. 5b,c, and Supplementary Table 3). For the upregulated DEGs, GOs relating to “protein catabolism” and “macromolecule localization” were mainly enriched in the NFAT group (Fig. 5b, the left panel). Some of the GOs were also enriched in the CREB group, such as GO:0070647 (protein modification by small protein conjugation or removal) and GO:0033036 (macromolecule localization), which were categorized in the “ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolism” and “organophosphate ester transport” clusters, respectively (Fig. 5b, the right panel and Supplementary Table 3). Furthermore, GO:0000266 (mitochondrial fission) was commonly enriched in both groups (Fig. 5b, and Supplementary Table 3). In contrast, the GO cluster “response to endoplasmic reticulum stress” was specific to the NFAT group (Fig. 5b and Supplementary Table 3). For the downregulated DEGs, metabolism-related GOs were generally enriched in both the NFAT and CREB groups (Fig. 5c and Supplementary Table 3). These data suggest that NFAT- and CREB-activation by trehalose treatment should promote the acceleration of protein catabolism and deceleration of diverse metabolic processes, which eventually invoke the ametabolic state in Pv11 cells, as observed in P. vanderplanki larvae6,7.
Discussion
The major achievements of the current study are: (i) successful construction of genome editing tools for Pv11 cells; and (ii) the application of this technique to reveal molecular signaling pathways responsible for anhydrobiosis in Pv11 cells. The Cas9-mediated genome editing technique has been much improved recently and is now a basic tool for molecular biology even in non-model species52,53,54,55. Here we used the CRIS-PITCh method for inserting genes of interest (Figs. 1, 2 and Fig. S4), and in one of the KI cell lines, GCaMP3-KI, uncovered a novel function of trehalose in evoking an intracellular calcium surge; in turn, this allowed us to reveal the involvement of calcium signaling pathways in the induction of anhydrobiosis. These results suggest that trehalose plays a critical role as a signal inducer.
To improve our understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying anhydrobiosis in Pv11 cells, we have developed several gene manipulation methods, particularly involving plasmid vectors for exogenous gene expression4,5,56. However, transfection of Pv11 cells can only be achieved by electroporation4, and in transient expression experiments, the damage incurred decreases the desiccation tolerance of the cells (Fig. S12). To avoid such temporary damage, we generated Pv11 cells that stably expressed AcGFP1 (Pv11-KH cells) after random integration of an expression vector. However, perhaps due to adventitious disruption of desiccation-related genes by genomic insertion of exogenous DNA fragments46,47, Pv11-KH cells show a lower desiccation tolerance than untransformed Pv114 (Fig. 1d). In contrast, the method established in this study allows us to effectively express exogenous genes without deleterious effects on the desiccation tolerance of Pv11 cells (Figs. 1, 2 and Fig. S4).
The CRISPR/Cas9 system functions in Pv11 cells with either synthetic gRNAs or gRNA expression vectors (Figs. S1 and S2). Furthermore, we have shown that targeted knock-in is possible using the PITCh method (Figs. 1, 2, and Fig. S4), which allowed the establishment of stably expressing cell lines without loss of anhydrobiotic ability (Figs. 1d, 2d, and Fig. S4d). In our forthcoming study, we plan to disrupt an endogenous gene and are now constructing the donor vectors to create knock-in/knock-out alleles11. Thus, the current success of targeted knock-in in Pv11 cells should lead to endogenous gene knock-out experiments aimed at identifying the genes essential for anhydrobiosis (Supplementary Note).
In the current CRISPR/Cas9 technique for Pv11 cells, we acquired clonal cell lines; after transfection of a set of vectors for the CRISPR/Cas9 system, the cells were treated with zeocin to eliminate genetically unmodified or imprecisely edited cells. At the sorting process, GCaMP3-positive cells accounted only for 5.1% (Fig. S13). To increase the knock-in efficiency, optimizing homology arm length can be one of the ordinary solutions57,58. Generally, knock-in efficiency becomes higher as homology arms of donor DNAs become longer especially when homology arm length is short. However, knock-in efficiency also reaches a plateau at a certain length of homology arms. So, we are trying to find the best length for the current Cas9-mediated knock-in system in Pv11 cells.
GCaMP3-KI cells fluorescence strongly immediately after trehalose treatment (Fig. 3), suggesting that they (and likely therefore the parental cell type, Pv11) interpret the presence of trehalose in the extracellular medium as a specific signal. But how is this transduced into an intracellular calcium concentration spike? We hypothesize that osmotic sensors and mechanosensors, such as OSCA, Piezo and TRP cation channels59,60,61, might be responsible for the Ca2+ mobilization. For example, gated channels that allow mono- or divalent cations such as Na+ or Ca2+ to enter cells, have the potential to activate calcium signaling pathways. Another candidate is a gustatory receptor that senses trehalose, like Gr5a62,63. In Gr5a-expressing Drosophila S2 cells, trehalose induces an intracellular calcium surge, suggesting that the receptor functions in multiple cellular types. Furthermore, recent research raises the possibility that several gustatory receptors expressed in non-gustatory neurons have roles other than chemosensation64,65. To examine this possibility, in silico screening and experimental confirmation may be needed66,67. We believe that these approaches will clarify the molecular mechanism of trehalose sensing and calcium signaling in Pv11 cells.
Our results identify a critical role for calcium signaling pathways in anhydrobiosis in Pv11 cells (Fig. 4). A potential contribution of calcium signaling to anhydrobiosis has also been suggested in tardigrades and nematodes68,69. In the anhydrobiotic tardigrade, Hypsibius dujardini, a calmodulin inhibitor (J-8) and a calcium release modulator (2-APB) reduce the survival rate after rehydration, while inhibitors of CaN and CaMK have no effect on anhydrobiotic ability. Given that calmodulin regulates the gating of calcium ion channels in endoplasmic reticulum and mitochondria as well as the signaling pathways70,71, treatment with J-8 and 2-APB may disrupt calcium storage in these organelles rather than calcium signaling, leading to organelle malfunction72,73. RNAi-based screening of the nematode, Panagrolaimus superbus, showed that knockdown of “CAMK/CAMKL/MELK protein kinase” decreased the survival rate after rehydration69, but the contribution of the CaN–NFAT pathway or CREB to anhydrobiotic ability was not assessed. Our detailed experiments show that activation of the CaM–CaN–NFAT pathway confers tolerance both to trehalose treatment and desiccation on Pv11 cells, while activation of the CaM–CaMK–CREB pathway leads only to desiccation tolerance (Fig. 4 and Fig. S11). Therefore, our study demonstrates different functions of the individual calcium pathways in anhydrobiosis for the first time.
The GO analysis (Fig. 5b) implies one mechanism by which the CaM–CaN–NFAT pathway protects trehalose-induced Pv11 cells from cell death during anhydrobiosis (Fig. 4a–c,f). GO terms related to “response to endoplasmic reticulum stress” were enriched only in the NFAT-upregulated group (Fig. 5b and Supplementary Table 3). In general, ER stress is triggered by hyperosmolality, and it causes cell death74,75,76,77. Hence, in trehalose-treated Pv11 cells, the CaM–CaN–NFAT pathway could alleviate the deleterious effects of ER stress.
The GO analysis also suggests how the calcium signaling pathways might control entrance into the ametabolic state (Fig. 5). Figure 5b,c show that both NFAT and CREB can accelerate protein catabolism and decelerate diverse metabolic processes (Fig. 5b,c, and Supplementary Table 3). Furthermore, GOs related to localization, transport and mitochondria are commonly enriched in both groups (Fig. 5b,c, and Supplementary Table 3). Therefore, during trehalose treatment, Pv11 cells probably prepare existing biomolecules and organelles for forthcoming desiccation instead of activating metabolic processes.
In the current study, we succeeded in detecting Ca2+ mobilization using GCaMP3-KI cells. Ca2+ is one of many second messengers used by cells, and the knock-in technique can be used to study them since a wide variety of genetically encoded fluorescent sensors have been developed17. For example, cyclic AMP, inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate, diacylglycerol and reactive oxygen species78,79 can all be detected by specific fluorescent sensors. In addition, there are also fluorescent sensors that report the activation status of proteases, kinases, and GTPases80,81. Thus, real-time monitoring of these biomolecules should uncover an anhydrobiosis-specific signaling profile. Another advantage of genetically encoded fluorescence sensors is that their subcellular localization can be controlled80,82. Given that differential subcellular localization of channels and enzymes contributes to their specific functions83,84,85,86,87,88,89, analyzing the active state of signal pathways with subcellular resolution should facilitate a comprehensive understanding of the anhydrobiosis-related signaling profile.
Recent reports have revealed that integrating genetic materials can change a transcriptional profile due to chromatin and chromosome conformation changes90,91. In the current study, GCaMP3-KI cells may have the different transcriptional profile compared to wild type cells, which might induce intracellular Ca2+ surge (Fig. 3). To exclude the possibility, RNA-seq data of GCaMP3-KI and wild-type cells should be compared. On the other hand, the inhibitor experiments in this article were performed in wild-type cells, so the contribution of the calcium signaling pathways in anhydrobiosis was proved independently.
In conclusion, genome editing with the CRISPR/Cas9 system has been successfully developed in Pv11 cells, and reveals the critical contribution of calcium signaling pathways to anhydrobiosis. This technique will allow further advanced molecular engineering strategies, such as gene knockout, and enable us to characterize the mechanisms underlying anhydrobiosis in Pv11 cells.
Methods
Cell culture
Pv11 and Pv11-KH cells were grown in IPL-41 medium (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) supplemented with 2.6 g/L tryptose phosphate broth (Becton, Dickinson and Company, Franklin Lakes, NJ), 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum, and 0.05% (v/v) of an antibiotic and antimycotic mixture (penicillin, amphotericin B, and streptomycin; MilliporeSigma, Burlington, MA)5, designated hereafter as complete IPL-41 medium.
Expression vectors
The SpCas9-expressing vector was constructed by replacing the AcGFP1 region of pPv121-AcGFP1 using a HiFi Assembly kit (New England BioLabs, Ipswich, MA)56. The SpCas9 gene was cloned from pBS-Hsp70-Cas9, which was a gift from Melissa Harrison, Kate O'Connor-Giles and Jill Wildonger (Addgene plasmid # 46294; http://n2t.net/addgene:46294; RRID: Addgene_46294).
The PvU6b promoter was cloned after reference to the gene model in MidgeBase (http://bertone.nises-f.affrc.go.jp/midgebase/). The pPvU6b plasmid was constructed by replacing the DmU6 promoter of pU6-BbsI-chiRNA with the PvU6b promoter and inserting the DmtRNA sequence described previously44,45. pU6-BbsI-chiRNA was a gift from Melissa Harrison, Kate O'Connor-Giles and Jill Wildonger (Addgene plasmid # 45946; http://n2t.net/addgene:45946; RRID:Addgene_45946)92, and we named the vector pPvU6b-DmtRNA-BbsI (the complete sequence is shown in Supplementary Data 1). To express the gRNA targeting the 5′-flanking site of the stop codon of Pv.00443 (Fig. 1), pPvU6b-DmtRNA-Pv.00443#1 was constructed as follows: (i) pPvU6b-DmtRNA-BbsI was restricted with BbsI, (ii) two oligonucleotides were annealed (Supplementary Table 2), and (iii) the annealed DNA was ligated into the cut vector (the complete sequences of the gRNA-expression vectors used in the current study are shown in Supplementary Data 8, 9 and 10).
Donor vectors
The donor vector containing the AcGFP1-P2A-ZeoR sequence (Fig. 1) was constructed using PCR, a HiFi Assembly kit (New England BioLabs) and a TOPO cloning kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Briefly, the polycistronic sequence of AcGFP1-P2A-ZeoR was inserted into the pPv121 vector using a HiFi Assembly kit (New England BioLabs). Then, the vector was used as a PCR template to add another P2A sequence to the 5′ end of AcGFP1, and the PCR product was inserted into the pCR-Blunt II-TOPO vector (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Next, the vector was used as a PCR template to add the gRNA-target and microhomology sequences, and the PCR product was also cloned into pCR-Blunt II-TOPO (the complete sequence is shown in Supplementary Data 2). To construct the donor vector for inserting the HaloTag gene (Fig. S4), pCR4 Blunt-TOPO was used for cloning. To construct the donor vector for inserting the other genes, we created the basic vector, pCR4-Pv.00443#1µH-P2A-BbsI, which contains the gRNA-target, microhomology, P2A, and BbsI sequences; first, a synthetic gene with the sequences was acquired for the PCR template (eurofins Genomics, Tokyo, Japan), and the PCR product was cloned into pCR4 Blunt-TOPO (the complete sequence is shown in Supplementary Data 11). To construct the donor vectors for inserting the BlaR, ZeoR, and GCaMP3 genes (Fig. S4 and Fig. 2), the basic vector was restricted with BbsI (New England BioLabs) and HiFi Assembly was performed. The HaloTag, BlaR and GCaMP3 genes were cloned from pFN19K HaloTag T7 SP6 (Promega, Fitchburg, WI), pYES6/CT (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and G-CaMP3 (a gift from Loren Looger; Addgene plasmid # 22692; http://n2t.net/addgene:22692; RRID:Addgene_22692)93, respectively (the complete sequences are shown in Supplementary Data 12, 13, 14 and 15).
Transfection, drug selection and cell sorting
The cells used in each experiment were seeded at a density of 3 × 105 cells per mL into a 25 cm2 cell culture flask and grown at 25 °C for 4–6 days before transfection. Transfection was carried out using a NEPA21 Super Electroporator (Nepa Gene, Chiba, Japan) as described previously4. Five µg each of the gRNA- and SpCas9-expression vectors plus 0.03–0.1 pmol donor vectors were transfected into the cells. Five days after transfection, the cells at a density of 1 × 105 cells per mL were treated with 400 µg/mL zeocin or 200 µg/mL blasticidin. After 1 week of drug selection, the medium was changed to normal IPL-41 medium and the cells were incubated for a further 2 weeks. To establish clonal cell lines, single cell sorting was performed using a MoFlo Astrios cell-sorter (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA) equipped with 355-, 488- and 640-nm lasers. One thousand intact Pv11 cells were seeded as a feeder layer in each well of a 96-well plate prior to sorting. HaloTag-positive cells were labeled with fluorescent Janelia Fluor 646 HaloTag Ligand (Promega). GCaMP3-KI cells exhibited strong fluorescence when passed through a flow cytometer, perhaps due to shear or/and mechanical stress (Fig. S5). The cells were stained with DAPI (Dojindo, Kumamoto, Japan), and DAPI, GCaMP3 and Janelia Fluor 646 HaloTag Ligand were excited with 355-nm, 488-nm and 640-nm lasers, respectively. After single cell sorting, the cells were grown for 2 weeks, and then treated with zeocin or blasticidin to eliminate feeder cells. If the drug selection was not completely effective, bulk cell sorting was performed.
Genomic PCR and sequencing analysis
To confirm precise gene knock-in, genomic PCR and sequencing analysis were performed (Figs. 1, 2, Fig. S4). For genomic PCR, the genomes of Pv11 cells and clonal cell lines were extracted with a NucleoSpin Tissue kit (Takara Bio, Shiga, Japan) and subjected to PCR using the following primer set: 5′-GCCAAAGCGAGCCAATTCAA-3′ and 5′-GGGTGTTATTGCTACTTTAATGCGT-3′. PCR images were acquired using a ChemiDoc Touch imaging system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). After gel purification of the PCR products, sub-cloning was carried out using a TOPO cloning kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and plasmids were sequenced.
Desiccation and rehydration
Pv11 cells were subjected to desiccation-rehydration (Figs. 1d, 2d, 4, Fig. S4d) as described previously3. Briefly, cells were incubated in preconditioning medium (600 mM trehalose containing 10% (v/v) complete IPL-41 medium) for 48 h at 25 °C, and then suspended in 400 µL preconditioning medium. Forty microliter aliquots of the cell suspension were dropped into 35-mm petri dishes, and the dishes were desiccated and maintained at < 10% relative humidity and 25 °C for more than 10 days. An hour after rehydration by complete IPL-41 medium, cells were stained with propidium iodide (PI; Dojindo) for dead-cell detection and Hoechst 33342 (Dojindo) for whole-cell detection, and images were acquired using a conventional fluorescence microscope (BZ-X700; Keyence, Osaka, Japan). The survival rate was calculated as the ratio of the number of live cells (Hoechst-positive and PI-negative) to that of total cells (Hoechst-positive).
GCaMP3 fluorescence quantification
Images for GCaMP3 fluorescence quantification of the cells were acquired as follows: (i) 50 µL of complete IPL-41 media with 10 µg/mL Hoechst 33342 (Dojindo) was placed in a well of a 48-well plate, (ii) 50 µL of cell suspension was added to the well, and cells were allowed to attach to the culture surface (usually 7–10 min), (iii) a “0 min” image was acquired, (iv) 900 µL of 600 mM trehalose, complete IPL-41 or complete IPL-41 with ionomycin was added into the well, and time course images were acquired. The brightness of GCaMP3 fluorescence was quantified using Hybrid Cell Count BZ-H2C software (Keyence). Cell numbers were also counted using Hoechst 33342 fluorescence and the same software.
Ionomycin or inhibitor treatment
GCaMP3-KI cells were treated with ionomycin at 10 µM (Fig. 2b, Figs. S9 and S10, and Supplementary Table 1). To inhibit calcium signaling due to trehalose treatment, Pv11 cells were pretreated with inhibitors for 1 h, and then treated with trehalose or complete IPL-41 plus inhibitors (Figs. 4 and S11b, and Supplementary Table 1).
mRNA-seq data processing
RNA-Seq data of Pv11 cells exposed to 600 mM trehalose were obtained from our previous study9 (accession number DRA008948). Reads were mapped to Pv_5.2 CDS sequences (https://midgebase2.dna.affrc.go.jp/) and expression values were quantified with bowtie2 v2.4.294 and RSEM v1.2.3095 using the Trinity v2.9.196,97 utility. Mapped read counts were tested for differential expression with DESeq2 v1.26.098. Transcripts with FDR below 0.05 were determined as differentially expressed. Z-scaled TPM values were visualized as a heat map, by clustering 1-Spearman correlation with the Ward’s method in R.
Motif enrichment analysis
To identify genes with NFAT or CREB binding motifs in the promoter region, we utilized HOMER2 v4.10.098. Binding motifs were obtained from the HOMER2 motif database [NFAT(RHD), CRE(bZIP)] and the − 2000 bp to + 150 bp genomic regions surrounding transcription start sites were searched with the annotatePeaks.pl utility in HOMER2. Transcripts with either motif were analyzed with GOstat v2.52.099 to identify enriched gene ontologies using the Pv_5.2 annotation. Enriched ontologies were summarized and visualized with REVIGO100, accessed February 2021, using tiny settings.
Statistics and reproducibility
All data were expressed as mean ± SD. Differences between two groups were examined for statistical significance by the two-sided Student t-test in Figs. 2d, 4 and Fig. S4d. Differences among more than three groups were examined by ANOVA followed by a Tukey test (Figs. 1d and 4). A P-value < 0.05 denoted a statistically significant difference. GraphPad Prism 8 software (GraphPad, San Diego, CA) was used for statistical analyses. Experiments were independently repeated at least three times in general. The raw data underlying plots in the figures are available in Supplementary Data 16.
References
Wharton, D. A. Anhydrobiosis. Curr. Biol. 25, R1114–R1116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2015.09.047 (2015).
Nakahara, Y. et al. Cells from an anhydrobiotic chironomid survive almost complete desiccation. Cryobiology 60, 138–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cryobiol.2009.10.004 (2010).
Watanabe, K., Imanishi, S., Akiduki, G., Cornette, R. & Okuda, T. Air-dried cells from the anhydrobiotic insect, Polypedilum vanderplanki, can survive long term preservation at room temperature and retain proliferation potential after rehydration. Cryobiology 73, 93–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cryobiol.2016.05.006 (2016).
Sogame, Y. et al. Establishment of gene transfer and gene silencing methods in a desiccation-tolerant cell line, Pv11. Extremophiles 21, 65–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00792-016-0880-4 (2017).
Miyata, Y. et al. Identification of a novel strong promoter from the anhydrobiotic midge, Polypedilum vanderplanki, with conserved function in various insect cell lines. Sci. Rep. 9, 7004. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-43441-x (2019).
Cornette, R. & Kikawada, T. The induction of anhydrobiosis in the sleeping chironomid: Current status of our knowledge. IUBMB Life 63, 419–429. https://doi.org/10.1002/iub.463 (2011).
Ryabova, A. et al. Combined metabolome and transcriptome analysis reveals key components of complete desiccation tolerance in an anhydrobiotic insect. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 117, 19209–19220. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2003650117 (2020).
Yamada, T. G. et al. Transcriptome analysis of the anhydrobiotic cell line Pv11 infers the mechanism of desiccation tolerance and recovery. Sci. Rep. 8, 17941. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-36124-6 (2018).
Yamada, T. G. et al. Identification of a master transcription factor and a regulatory mechanism for desiccation tolerance in the anhydrobiotic cell line Pv11. PLoS One 15, e0230218. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230218 (2020).
Doudna, J. A. & Charpentier, E. (2014) Genome editing. The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9. Science 346, 1258096. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1258096.
Sakuma, T., Nakade, S., Sakane, Y., Suzuki, K. T. & Yamamoto, T. MMEJ-assisted gene knock-in using TALENs and CRISPR-Cas9 with the PITCh systems. Nat. Protoc. 11, 118–133. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2015.140 (2016).
Banan, M. Recent advances in CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knock-ins in mammalian cells. J. Biotechnol. 308, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2019.11.010 (2020).
Chojnacka-Puchta, L. & Sawicka, D. CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing in a chicken model: Current approaches and applications. J. Appl. Genet. 61, 221–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13353-020-00537-9 (2020).
Taning, C. N. T., Van Eynde, B., Yu, N., Ma, S. & Smagghe, G. CRISPR/Cas9 in insects: Applications, best practices and biosafety concerns. J. Insect Physiol. 98, 245–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinsphys.2017.01.007 (2017).
Bortesi, L. & Fischer, R. The CRISPR/Cas9 system for plant genome editing and beyond. Biotechnol. Adv. 33, 41–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2014.12.006 (2015).
Yao, R. et al. CRISPR-Cas9/Cas12a biotechnology and application in bacteria. Synth. Syst. Biotechnol. 3, 135–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.synbio.2018.09.004 (2018).
Sanford, L. & Palmer, A. Recent advances in development of genetically encoded fluorescent sensors. Methods Enzymol. 589, 1–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.mie.2017.01.019 (2017).
Mank, M. & Griesbeck, O. Genetically encoded calcium indicators. Chem. Rev. 108, 1550–1564. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr078213v (2008).
Shigetomi, E., Patel, S. & Khakh, B. S. Probing the complexities of astrocyte calcium signaling. Trends Cell Biol. 26, 300–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2016.01.003 (2016).
Zhong, C. & Schleifenbaum, J. Genetically encoded calcium indicators: A new tool in renal hypertension research. Front. Med. (Lausanne) 6, 128. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2019.00128 (2019).
Bassett, J. J. & Monteith, G. R. Genetically encoded calcium indicators as probes to assess the role of calcium channels in disease and for high-throughput drug discovery. Adv. Pharmacol. 79, 141–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.apha.2017.01.001 (2017).
Cai, B. et al. A cell-based functional assay using a green fluorescent protein-based calcium indicator dCys-GCaMP. Assay Drug Dev. Technol. 12, 342–351. https://doi.org/10.1089/adt.2014.584 (2014).
Wu, N., Nishioka, W. K., Derecki, N. C. & Maher, M. P. High-throughput-compatible assays using a genetically-encoded calcium indicator. Sci. Rep. 9, 12692. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-49070-8 (2019).
Kakita, T. et al. Calcineurin pathway is required for endothelin-1-mediated protection against oxidant stress-induced apoptosis in cardiac myocytes. Circ. Res. 88, 1239–1246. https://doi.org/10.1161/hh1201.091794 (2001).
Takata, T. et al. Redox regulation of Ca(2+)/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase IV via oxidation of its active-site cysteine residue. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 130, 99–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2018.10.440 (2019).
Yamaguchi, T., Omori, M., Tanaka, N. & Fukui, N. Distinct and additive effects of sodium bicarbonate and continuous mild heat stress on fiber type shift via calcineurin/NFAT pathway in human skeletal myoblasts. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 305, C323–C333. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.00393.2012 (2013).
Li, S. Z. et al. Calcineurin-NFATc signaling pathway regulates AQP2 expression in response to calcium signals and osmotic stress. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 292, C1606–C1616. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.00588.2005 (2007).
Belmont, P. J. et al. Coordination of growth and endoplasmic reticulum stress signaling by regulator of calcineurin 1 (RCAN1), a novel ATF6-inducible gene. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 14012–14021. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M709776200 (2008).
Kikuchi, D., Tanimoto, K. & Nakayama, K. CREB is activated by ER stress and modulates the unfolded protein response by regulating the expression of IRE1alpha and PERK. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 469, 243–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.11.113 (2016).
Berridge, M. J. Calcium signalling remodelling and disease. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 40, 297–309. https://doi.org/10.1042/BST20110766 (2012).
Berridge, M. J., Bootman, M. D. & Roderick, H. L. Calcium signalling: Dynamics, homeostasis and remodelling. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 4, 517–529. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm1155 (2003).
Hogan, P. G., Chen, L., Nardone, J. & Rao, A. Transcriptional regulation by calcium, calcineurin, and NFAT. Genes Dev. 17, 2205–2232. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.1102703 (2003).
Portales-Casamar, E. et al. PAZAR: A framework for collection and dissemination of cis-regulatory sequence annotation. Genome Biol. 8, R207. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2007-8-10-r207 (2007).
Song, T., Zheng, Y.-M. & Wang, Y.-X. in Calcium Signaling in Airway Smooth Muscle Cells Ch. Chapter 22, 393–407 (2014).
Toth, A. B., Shum, A. K. & Prakriya, M. Regulation of neurogenesis by calcium signaling. Cell Calcium 59, 124–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceca.2016.02.011 (2016).
Oh-hora, M. & Rao, A. The calcium/NFAT pathway: Role in development and function of regulatory T cells. Microbes Infect. 11, 612–619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micinf.2009.04.008 (2009).
Rusnak, F. & Mertz, P. Calcineurin: Form and function. Physiol. Rev. 80, 1483–1521. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.2000.80.4.1483 (2000).
Myers, E. W. et al. A whole-genome assembly of Drosophila. Science 287, 2196–2204. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.287.5461.2196 (2000).
Gwack, Y. et al. A genome-wide Drosophila RNAi screen identifies DYRK-family kinases as regulators of NFAT. Nature 441, 646–650. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04631 (2006).
Sakamoto, K. M. & Frank, D. A. CREB in the pathophysiology of cancer: Implications for targeting transcription factors for cancer therapy. Clin. Cancer Res. 15, 2583–2587. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-1137 (2009).
Kunkel, G. R., Maser, R. L., Calvet, J. P. & Pederson, T. U6 small nuclear RNA is transcribed by RNA polymerase III. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 83, 8575–8579. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.83.22.8575 (1986).
Goomer, R. S. & Kunkel, G. R. The transcriptional start site for a human U6 small nuclear RNA gene is dictated by a compound promoter element consisting of the PSE and the TATA box. Nucleic Acids Res. 20, 4903–4912. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/20.18.4903 (1992).
Mabashi-Asazuma, H. & Jarvis, D. L. CRISPR-Cas9 vectors for genome editing and host engineering in the baculovirus-insect cell system. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 114, 9068–9073. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1705836114 (2017).
Xie, K., Minkenberg, B. & Yang, Y. Boosting CRISPR/Cas9 multiplex editing capability with the endogenous tRNA-processing system. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 112, 3570–3575. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1420294112 (2015).
Port, F. & Bullock, S. L. Augmenting CRISPR applications in Drosophila with tRNA-flanked sgRNAs. Nat. Methods 13, 852–854. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3972 (2016).
Lefesvre, P., Attema, J. & van Bekkum, D. A comparison of efficacy and toxicity between electroporation and adenoviral gene transfer. BMC Mol. Biol. 3, 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2199-3-12 (2002).
Yang, D. et al. Expression of Huntington’s disease protein results in apoptotic neurons in the brains of cloned transgenic pigs. Hum. Mol. Genet. 19, 3983–3994. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddq313 (2010).
Tsuzuki, S. et al. Switching between humoral and cellular immune responses in Drosophila is guided by the cytokine GBP. Nat. Commun. 5, 4628. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms5628 (2014).
Pech, U., Revelo, N. H., Seitz, K. J., Rizzoli, S. O. & Fiala, A. Optical dissection of experience-dependent pre- and postsynaptic plasticity in the Drosophila brain. Cell Rep. 10, 2083–2095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2015.02.065 (2015).
Roehrl, M. H. et al. Selective inhibition of calcineurin-NFAT signaling by blocking protein-protein interaction with small organic molecules. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101, 7554–7559. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0401835101 (2004).
Xie, F. et al. Identification of a potent inhibitor of CREB-mediated gene transcription with efficacious in vivo anticancer activity. J. Med. Chem. 58, 5075–5087. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b00468 (2015).
Sun, D., Guo, Z., Liu, Y. & Zhang, Y. Progress and prospects of CRISPR/Cas systems in insects and other arthropods. Front. Physiol. 8, 608. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2017.00608 (2017).
Zhang, L. & Reed, R. D. in Diversity and Evolution of Butterfly Wing Patterns Ch. Chapter 8, 155–172 (2017).
Nakade, S. et al. Microhomology-mediated end-joining-dependent integration of donor DNA in cells and animals using TALENs and CRISPR/Cas9. Nat. Commun. 5, 5560. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms6560 (2014).
Gilles, A. F., Schinko, J. B. & Averof, M. Efficient CRISPR-mediated gene targeting and transgene replacement in the beetle Tribolium castaneum. Development 142, 2832–2839. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.125054 (2015).
Tokumoto, S. et al. Development of a tet-on inducible expression system for the anhydrobiotic cell line, Pv11. Insects. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects11110781 (2020).
Zhang, J. P. et al. Efficient precise knockin with a double cut HDR donor after CRISPR/Cas9-mediated double-stranded DNA cleavage. Genome Biol. 18, 35. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-017-1164-8 (2017).
Byrne, S. M., Ortiz, L., Mali, P., Aach, J. & Church, G. M. Multi-kilobase homozygous targeted gene replacement in human induced pluripotent stem cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, e21. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gku1246 (2015).
Douguet, D. & Honore, E. Mammalian mechanoelectrical transduction: Structure and function of force-gated ion channels. Cell 179, 340–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2019.08.049 (2019).
Parpaite, T. & Coste, B. Piezo channels. Curr. Biol. 27, R250–R252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.01.048 (2017).
Pedersen, S. F. & Nilius, B. in Osmosensing and Osmosignaling Methods in Enzymology 183–207 (2007).
Ueno, K. et al. Trehalose sensitivity in Drosophila correlates with mutations in and expression of the gustatory receptor gene Gr5a. Curr. Biol. 11, 1451–1455. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0960-9822(01)00450-x (2001).
Chyb, S., Dahanukar, A., Wickens, A. & Carlson, J. R. Drosophila Gr5a encodes a taste receptor tuned to trehalose. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100(Suppl 2), 14526–14530. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2135339100 (2003).
Montell, C. A taste of the Drosophila gustatory receptors. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 19, 345–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2009.07.001 (2009).
Montell, C. Gustatory receptors: Not just for good taste. Curr. Biol. 23, R929-932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2013.09.026 (2013).
Scott, K. et al. A chemosensory gene family encoding candidate gustatory and olfactory receptors in Drosophila. Cell 104, 661–673. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0092-8674(01)00263-x (2001).
Dunipace, L., Meister, S., McNealy, C. & Amrein, H. Spatially restricted expression of candidate taste receptors in the Drosophila gustatory system. Curr. Biol. 11, 822–835. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0960-9822(01)00258-5 (2001).
Kondo, K., Kubo, T. & Kunieda, T. Suggested involvement of PP1/PP2A activity and de novo gene expression in anhydrobiotic survival in a tardigrade, Hypsibius dujardini, by chemical genetic approach. PLoS One 10, e0144803. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144803 (2015).
Evangelista, C. C. S. et al. Multiple genes contribute to anhydrobiosis (tolerance to extreme desiccation) in the nematode Panagrolaimus superbus. Genet. Mol. Biol. 40, 790–802. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4685-GMB-2017-0030 (2017).
Nunez, E., Muguruza-Montero, A. & Villarroel, A. Atomistic insights of calmodulin gating of complete ion channels. Int. J. Mol. Sci. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21041285 (2020).
Berchtold, M. W. & Villalobo, A. The many faces of calmodulin in cell proliferation, programmed cell death, autophagy, and cancer. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 398–435, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2013.10.021 (1843).
Coe, H. & Michalak, M. Calcium binding chaperones of the endoplasmic reticulum. Gen. Physiol. Biophys. 28 Spec No Focus, F96–F103 (2009).
Duchen, M. R. Mitochondria and calcium: From cell signalling to cell death. J. Physiol. 529(Pt 1), 57–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.00057.x (2000).
Burgos, J. I., Morell, M., Mariangelo, J. I. E. & Vila Petroff, M. Hyperosmotic stress promotes endoplasmic reticulum stress-dependent apoptosis in adult rat cardiac myocytes. Apoptosis 24, 785–797. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10495-019-01558-4 (2019).
Gankam-Kengne, F., Couturier, B. S., Soupart, A., Brion, J. P. & Decaux, G. Osmotic Stress-induced defective glial proteostasis contributes to brain demyelination after hyponatremia treatment. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 28, 1802–1813. https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2016050509 (2017).
Heimer, S. et al. Hypertonicity counteracts MCL-1 and renders BCL-XL a synthetic lethal target in head and neck cancer. FEBS J. 288, 1822–1838. https://doi.org/10.1111/febs.15492 (2021).
Crambert, G. et al. Epithelial sodium channel abundance is decreased by an unfolded protein response induced by hyperosmolality. Physiol. Rep. https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.12169 (2014).
Reth, M. Hydrogen peroxide as second messenger in lymphocyte activation. Nat. Immunol. 3, 1129–1134. https://doi.org/10.1038/ni1202-1129 (2002).
Drevet, J. R. & Aitken, R. J. Oxidation of sperm nucleus in mammals: A physiological necessity to some extent with adverse impacts on oocyte and offspring. Antioxidants (Basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox9020095 (2020).
VanEngelenburg, S. B. & Palmer, A. E. Fluorescent biosensors of protein function. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 12, 60–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2008.01.020 (2008).
Morris, M. C. Fluorescent biosensors—Probing protein kinase function in cancer and drug discovery. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1834, 1387–1395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbapap.2013.01.025 (2013).
Li, X. et al. Genetically encoded fluorescent probe to visualize intracellular phosphatidylinositol 3,5-bisphosphate localization and dynamics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110, 21165–21170. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1311864110 (2013).
Marchi, S. et al. Mitochondrial and endoplasmic reticulum calcium homeostasis and cell death. Cell Calcium 69, 62–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceca.2017.05.003 (2018).
Rizzuto, R. et al. Ca(2+) transfer from the ER to mitochondria: When, how and why. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1787, 1342–1351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbabio.2009.03.015 (2009).
Zhang, X., Hu, M., Yang, Y. & Xu, H. Organellar TRP channels. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 25, 1009–1018. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41594-018-0148-z (2018).
Skalhegg, B. S. & Tasken, K. Specificity in the cAMP/PKA signaling pathway. Differential expression, regulation, and subcellular localization of subunits of PKA. Front. Biosci. 5, D678–D693. https://doi.org/10.2741/skalhegg (2000).
Kobayashi, N. et al. Differential subcellular targeting and activity-dependent subcellular localization of diacylglycerol kinase isozymes in transfected cells. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 86, 433–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcb.2007.05.002 (2007).
Casar, B. et al. Ras subcellular localization defines extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1 and 2 substrate specificity through distinct utilization of scaffold proteins. Mol. Cell Biol. 29, 1338–1353. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.01359-08 (2009).
Zhou, L. & Zhu, D. Y. Neuronal nitric oxide synthase: Structure, subcellular localization, regulation, and clinical implications. Nitric Oxide 20, 223–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.niox.2009.03.001 (2009).
Hilliard, W. & Lee, K. H. Systematic identification of safe harbor regions in the CHO genome through a comprehensive epigenome analysis. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 118, 659–675. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.27599 (2021).
Dhiman, H., Campbell, M., Melcher, M., Smith, K. D. & Borth, N. Predicting favorable landing pads for targeted integrations in Chinese hamster ovary cell lines by learning stability characteristics from random transgene integrations. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 18, 3632–3648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2020.11.008 (2020).
Gratz, S. J. et al. Genome engineering of Drosophila with the CRISPR RNA-guided Cas9 nuclease. Genetics 194, 1029–1035. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.113.152710 (2013).
Tian, L. et al. Imaging neural activity in worms, flies and mice with improved GCaMP calcium indicators. Nat. Methods 6, 875–881. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1398 (2009).
Langmead, B. & Salzberg, S. L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 9, 357–359. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1923 (2012).
Li, B. & Dewey, C. N. RSEM: accurate transcript quantification from RNA-Seq data with or without a reference genome. BMC Bioinform. 12, 323. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-12-323 (2011).
Grabherr, M. G. et al. Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-Seq data without a reference genome. Nat. Biotechnol. 29, 644–652. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.1883 (2011).
Haas, B. J. et al. De novo transcript sequence reconstruction from RNA-seq using the Trinity platform for reference generation and analysis. Nat. Protoc. 8, 1494–1512. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2013.084 (2013).
Love, M. I., Huber, W. & Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15, 550. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8 (2014).
Beissbarth, T. & Speed, T. P. GOstat: Find statistically overrepresented Gene Ontologies within a group of genes. Bioinformatics 20, 1464–1465. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bth088 (2004).
Supek, F., Bosnjak, M., Skunca, N. & Smuc, T. REVIGO summarizes and visualizes long lists of gene ontology terms. PLoS One 6, e21800. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021800 (2011).
Acknowledgements
We would like to express our deep gratitude to Tomoe Shiratori (NARO) for her technical support. This work was supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (KAKENHI) Grants (numbers JP25128714 and JP17H01511 to T.K., JP18K14472 to Y.M., JP19J12030 to S.T., JP18J21155 to Y.Y., JP16K07308 to R.C. and JP18H02217 to O.G.), and T.K. and R.C. were also funded by the Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Research Council of the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (http://www.affrc.maff.go.jp) grant “Strategic International Collaborative Research Project” (JPJ008837). E.S. and R.D. were supported by Russian Science Foundation grant 20-44-07002 for the bioinformatics part of the study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Y.M. performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed to discussion, and wrote the manuscript. H.F. and S.T. performed the experiments, analyzed the data and contributed to discussions. R.D. analyzed the data and contributed to discussions. Y.H. and Y.Y. performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed to discussions and wrote the manuscript. T.Y., R.C., A.F., O.G., and E.S. contributed to discussions and participated in editing the manuscript. T.K. designed the project, wrote the manuscript, and contributed to discussions.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Miyata, Y., Fuse, H., Tokumoto, S. et al. Cas9-mediated genome editing reveals a significant contribution of calcium signaling pathways to anhydrobiosis in Pv11 cells. Sci Rep 11, 19698 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-98905-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-98905-w
This article is cited by
-
Effective methods for immobilization of non-adherent Pv11 cells while maintaining their desiccation tolerance
Cytotechnology (2023)
-
Genome editing
Scientific Reports (2022)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.