Abstract
Entomopathogenic nematodes are typically considered lethal parasites of insect hosts. Indeed they are employed as such for biological control of insect pests. The effects of exposure to entomopathogenic nematodes are not strictly limited to mortality, however. Here we explore non-lethal effects of exposure to entomopathogenic nematodes by introducing the relatively non-susceptible pupal stage of Delia antiqua to thirteen different strains. We specifically chose to inoculate the pupal stage because it tends to be more resistant to infection, yet resides in the soil where it could come into contact with EPN biological control agents. We find that there is no significant mortality at the pupal stage, but that there are a host of strain-dependent non-lethal effects during and after the transition to adulthood including altered developmental times and changes in risk of death compared to controls. We also find that exposure to specific strains can reduce risk of mortality. These results emphasize the strain-dependent nature of entomopathogenic nematode infection and highlight the positive and negative ramifications for non-lethal effects for biological control of insect pests. Our work emphasizes the need for strain-specific screening of biological control agents before wide-spread adoption.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Entomopathogenic nematodes (EPNs) are highly effective parasites of insects1. Often attacking and infecting larval stages of soil–borne insects, EPN infective juveniles seek out, infect, and ultimately kill their insect hosts with the help of symbiotic bacteria1,2. Because these infective juveniles are often lethal and kill their insect hosts within 24–48 h, they make ideal biological control agents2,3.
For biological control, the lethal nature of entomopathogenic nematodes is desirable3. It is precisely this characteristic that make them successful in controlling agricultural pests. Steinernema riobrave Cabanillas, Raulston & Poinar and Heterorhabditis bacteriophora Poinar (Rhabditida, Heterorhabditidae) reduced populations of Diaprepes root weevil (D. abbreviatus L.) by up to 90%4,5,6. Strains of S. scarabaei (Stock and Koppenhöfer) and H. zealandica Poinar were effective in controlling grubs including Popillia japonica (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae), respectively7,8. Other agricultural pests have also been successfully controlled by applications of EPNs9,10.
While there have been notable successes in controlling insect pests through applications of entomopathogenic nematodes, it seems likely that non-lethal or sub-lethal effects of EPN infection could potentially have long-lasting impacts on insect hosts. Indeed, this has begun to be documented. Infection by EPNs elicits very specific immune responses in host insects11,12. These can range from humoral responses, to encapsulation and melanization12,13,14. These responses have a cost, however. The host insect must invest substantial amounts of time and energy and fending off an attack by these parasites.
Even if the host insect is able to fend off attack, they may suffer fitness consequences. Colorado potato beetles infected with Steinernema carpocapsae (Weiser) as last instar larvae showed adult discoloration and deformation of the wings15. Colorado potato beetles exposed to S. feltiae demonstrated delayed metamorphosis16. These fitness consequences are not necessarily uniform in all environments, however. Abiotic factors such as temperature can affect both the susceptibility of insect immune system to parasite attack17,18,19 and the host-seeking behavior of parisitic nematodes20. Despite this variation, in each of these cases, EPNs had distinct consequences for the life history of their host insects; discoloration, deformation, and delayed metamorphosis presumably will negatively impact the ability of these insects to reproduce.
While some limited documentation of these non-lethal and sub-lethal effects of EPN infection is available, this is not the whole story. There is tremendous variation both in the ability of EPN strains to overcome host insect defenses and the ability of host insects to mount an effective immune response. Adult pine weevils that survived EPN exposure, for example, had very little if any impacts on feeding ability or other sub-lethal effects21. Indeed, encapsulated dead and live nematodes were recovered from infected insect hosts21. This is not an isolated report; specific strains of EPN can modulate and even escape host insect immune responses11. Steinernema carpocapsae can strongly inhibit the host prophenoloxidase–phenoloxidase system in red palm weevils and completely escape the encapsulation response22. In comparing multiple strains across four different insects, S. glaseri NC strain suppressed immune responses while S. glaseri FL strain was less successful11.
This strain dependent nature of host immune response has ramifications both for our understanding the nature of insect parasite infection, but also for the use of EPNs as biological control agents in applied systems—particularly in cases where insect life stages accessible to EPNs are more protected. Maggot flies of vegetables, for example, have pupal life stages that can reside in the soil for some time, but more susceptible larval stages tend to be more protected as they feed on the plant. With onion maggot (Delia antiqua) for instance, EPN susceptible larvae spend much of their life inside an onion bulb while pupae are more exposed in the soil. This pest can be a management challenge, particularly in areas of continuous cultivation; producers are actively seeking alternative management options23,24.
To evaluate the impact of entomopathogenic nematode exposure on the D. antiqua pupal life stage, we exposed pupae to 13 different EPN strains and closely monitored the results. Specifically we were interested in the strain dependent impact on long-term survival, mortality (if any), time spent in the pupal life stage, and long-lasting effects on adult fitness.
Methods
Organisms
Entomopathogenic nematodes
Thirteen strains of entomopathogenic nematodes were maintained in the Natural Enemy Management and Applications (NEMA) Lab at Cornell AgriTech (Table 1). These entomopathogenic nematodes were isolated from field locations across the eastern United States and reared in Galleria mellonella larvae following standard techniques25. To do so, 1 mL of EPN suspension (at 1000 IJ/mL) from each strain was added to five G. mellonella larvae placed on moistened filter paper in 54 mm petri dishes. Strict sterilization protocols were put in place to ensure strain isolation and prevent cross contamination. Dishes with inoculated G. mellonella were kept in a growth chamber at 25 \(^{\circ }\)C for 7 days, then they were transferred to White traps26. The filter paper under the worms were moisturized periodically to induce nematode release and migration to the water in the White traps. Following emergence from G. mellonella cadavers, nematodes were stored in 250ml tissue culture flasks at 500 IJs/ml at 25 \(^{\circ }\)C until use in assays within 7 days of emergence.
Delia antiqua
Larval D. antiqua were collected from infested onions in onion muck fields in upstate NY. Larvae were removed from the infested onions and placed in sand containers where they were allowed to pupate and emerge as adults. Adults were placed in plexiglass cages (40 cm \(\times \) 40 cm) with a screening on two sides and a sleeve on the front and fed with a mix of sugar, skim dry milk, brewer’s yeast, and soy peptone (10:10:1:1); water was also provided through dental wicking immersed in a water flask. The cages were kept in an environmental chamber at 25 \(^{\circ }\)C, 16h of light and 8 h of dark, and 62% relative humidity. The food mixture and water flask was changed every 4 days. A plastic container with moistened sand and a halved organic yellow onion was added inside the cages for oviposition. Thereafter, the oviposition box was transferred to holding cages for eclosion, larval development, and pupal formation. Pupal formation occurs approximately 20 days after transfer of the oviposition box to the holding cage.
Bioassays and experimental design
Early stage D. antiqua pupae were collected from 20 days after oviposition, then transferred to 24 well ELISA plates, one pupa per well. Each well also contained a filter paper disk. Each plate was divided in half to accommodate control and an EPN strain application in each plate: 12 wells each for control and 12 wells for EPN strain application. This allowed for a paired experimental design; comparisons of EPN treated pupa with controls were made within the same cohort in the same experimental environment. After adding one pupa in each well, 100 of solution was added to each pupa containing well. For control wells, this solution was DI water only. For EPN strain treated wells, this solution contained 100 infective juveniles of the respective strain.
After inoculation, ELISA plates containing inoculated pupae were kept in a chamber at \(25 \pm 1\,^{\circ }{\text {C}}\), with a photoperiod of 16 h of light and 8 h of dark, and 62% RH. The plates were evaluated every 24 h beginning 6 days after inoculation when adults began to emerge until complete emergence and death of the adults. Adults were considered to have emerged when they were entirely out of the pupa shell, and dead when they did not respond to any stimulus when poked with a scalpel.
Analysis
To evaluate the effect of differential EPN strain infection on D. antiqua pupae, we evaluated survival across the experimental time course and bootstrapped percent eclosion rates to determine direct EPN mortality at the pupal stage. Time (days) as pupae was modeled using Poisson regression with post-hoc mean differentiation using Dunnett’s test. Conformance to assumptions of normality and homoscedasticity were evaluated through examination of model diagnostics. Best fit models were chosen using a combination of model performance metrics including information criteria, pseudo-R2 values, and examination of residuals.
Logistic regression was used to evaluate the probability of adult mortality over time. Treatment, plate, and days since inoculation were factors considered in this analysis with response being the binary alive versus dead daily assessment. Post-hoc analysis was conducted with Dunnett’s test of treatment comparisons to control. Best fit models were chosen through a combination of model performance metrics including best-fit assessments, information criteria, pseudo-R2 values, and other model diagnostics including residual analysis.
All data were stored in flat CSV files and imported into R version 4.0.4 for analysis27. The tidyverse, car, and emmeans packages were used to facilitate analysis and graphical display of results28,29,30. All data and scripts for analysis will be available on GitHub following acceptance of this manuscript: https://github.com/acetworld/non-lethal-epn.
All methods complied with relevant jurisdictional guidelines and legislation.
Signed/written informed consent
Landowners of field sites gave explicit permission to both work on their land, collect samples, and publish the results.
Results
Inoculating pupae with a spectrum of entomopathogenic nematodes strains had differential effects on survival, time spent as a pupae, and likelihood of mortality as an adult.
Pupal infection by some strains of EPN had little to no effect on long-term survival of D. antiqua (Fig. 1A). Survival curves for D. antiqua inoculated with H. indica LW, S. carpocapsae, and S. glaseri NC were similar with non-inoculated controls. On the other hand, infection by S. diaprepesi BRT seemed to prolong life; D. antiqua pupae infected with this strain maintained a survival rate greater than 25% and higher than controls through the end of the trial. Other strains, particularly the S. carpocapsae strain isolated from New York, were particularly virulent even against pupae (Fig. 1B).
Inoculating D. antiqua pupae with EPNs did not cause attributable immediate mortality at the pupal stage (Fig. 2). The overall eclosion rate from pupae to adults was 86% for the whole trial and many cohorts of both EPN treated and controls had 100% emergence. There were no significant (\(p > 0.05\)) effects of EPN inoculation on probability of mortality at the pupal life stage and no significant differences (\(p > 0.05\)) between EPN treated pupae and paired controls for all strains evaluated in this trial.
Inoculating D. antiqua pupae with EPNs altered the time spent as pupae in a strain-dependent manner (Fig. 3). Treatment with EPNs, EPN strain, and their interaction significantly explained observed differences in pupal time (Table 2). Treatments of H. bacteriophora and S. feltiae from NY significantly increased time (by \(1.9\pm 0.4\) and \(0.4\pm 0.2\) days on average respectively, \(p < 0.01\)) spent as pupae when compared with paired controls. Treatments with S. khuongi ARCA significantly reduced the time D. antiqua (by \(0.3\pm 0.2\) days on average, \(p = 0.03\)) spent as pupae when compared with paired controls.
Exposure to EPNs during the pupal life stage significantly influenced the odds of mortality during the adult stage in an EPN strain-dependent manner (Fig. 4, Table 2). Inoculations with S. carpocapsae NY, S. khuongi ARCA, and H. bacteriophora NY significantly (\(p < 0.04\)) increased the odds of mortality of EPN exposure individuals as compared with controls. Individuals exposed to S. carpocapsae NY were \(5.6\pm 1.7\) times more likely to die than those individuals in the paired control cohort. Exposure to S. khuongi Web significantly decreased the odds of mortality (\(p = 0.003\)); individuals exposed to this strain were \(59.3\pm 12.6\)% less likely to die as compared with individuals from the paired control cohort.
Discussion
D. antiqua pupae exposed to entomopathogenic nematodes (EPNs) demonstrated effects that persisted across their adult life in a strain dependent manner. Echoing the results of Li et al.11, different strains, even of the same species, produced markedly different effects. These effects were predominantly non-lethal. While adult survival was variable (Fig. 1), exposure to EPNs did not kill the pupae nor result in substantial immediate mortality of adults. The majority of individual insects assayed in this trials eclosed as alive adults and there were no significant effects of EPN exposure on that eclosion (Fig. 2).
Eclosion and arrival at adulthood was not synchronous, however (Fig. 3). Exposure to EPNs as pupae altered the time individuals spent as pupae in a strain-dependent manner. Similar to results observed by Ebrahimi et al.16 in Colorado potato beetle, certain strains significantly increased the time spent as pupae. Unlike findings from previous work, exposure to S. khuongi ARCA sped up development. While these developmental changes were at most on the order of two days, this highlights the effect of exposure on lifecycle development and has possible ramifications for performance as adults.
The adults that eclosed were not uniformly healthy. While we did not make extensive and specific assessments of morphology, adult flies emerging from control groups seemed uniformly healthy. Deformities similar to those observed by16 and15 were noted in some adults in EPN exposed cohorts. These deformities likely contributed to early mortality and/or a higher likelihood of mortality observed in some EPN exposed cohorts. Exposure to S. carpocapsae NY and S. khuongi ARCA increased the odds that a given individual would die by approximately 5 and 4 fold respectively (Fig. 4).
Unexpectedly, we observed differential effects of exposure on different metrics by strain; the strains altering time spent as pupae were not consistently the same strains increasing the odds of mortality as an adult. For example, S. carpocapsae NY did not significantly alter time spent as a pupae, but substantially increased the odds of mortality. H. bacteriophora NY substantially increased the time spent as a pupae and slightly increased the odds of mortality as an adult, but S. khuongi ARCA reduced the time spent as a pupae and substantially increased odds of mortality as an adult. These contrasting results suggest competing underlying mechanisms of combating EPN infection on the part of the insect host or escaping immune responses on the part of EPNs.
An additional unexpected result was the ability of exposure to EPNs to reduce the odds of mortality as an adult. Exposure to S. khuongi Web reduced the odds of mortality of adults by almost 60%. While the mechanism behind this is unknown, this could be an example of eustress where stimulation of an immune response by S. khuongi Web actually improves the longevity and viability of adults. While more work would be needed to bear this out, it could align well with other research showing that stimulation of certain immune responses in humans and C. elegans can influence longevity31,32.
Irrespective of the mechanism, the example of S. khuongi Web and strain-dependent responses observed in this trial demonstrate the importance of strain considerations in working with nematode parasites of insects. Most of the literature documents positive effects of EPNs in increasing insect mortality alongside documentation of ineffective species and strains that do not substantially increase mortality. Our results suggest that in certain cases, with exposure to certain strains at specific life stages, EPNs may actually elicit immune responses that reduce the odds of mortality.
These immune responses seem to have long-lasting effects over an insect’s life and, for those strains that increase odds of mortality, hold great potential for biological control. Echoing other recent work, specific strains seem better able to overcome host immune responses, even in the pupal stage33. Despite a lack of immediate mortality in this trial during the pupal life stage and despite eclosion as alive adults, exposure to specific EPN strains during the pupal stage can increase the odds of death as an adult. This approach could make adults more susceptible to other mortality factors and, over the long term, lead to reduced populations. It is important to note, however, the importance of strain considerations in designing effective solutions for biological control. As our results suggest, while certain strains can certainly be more virulent, others may have very little effect or even have marginally beneficial effects on host insect populations.
References
Gaugler, R. Entomopathogenic nematology (2002).
Gaugler, R. Entomopathogenic Nematodes in Biological Control (CRC Press, 2018).
Grewal, P. S., Ehlers, R.-U. & Shapiro-Ilan, D. I. Nematodes as Biocontrol Agents (CABI, 2005).
Duncan, L. & McCoy, C. Vertical distribution in soil, persistence, and efficacy against citrus root weevil (coleoptera: Curculionidae) of two species of entomogenous nematodes (rhabditida: Steinernematidae; heterorhabditidae). Environ. Entomol. 25, 174–178 (1996).
Duncan, L., McCoy, C. & Terranova, A. Estimating sample size and persistence of entomogenous nematodes in sandy soils and their efficacy against the larvae of Diaprepes abbreviatus in Florida. J. Nematol. 28, 56 (1996).
Bullock, R., Pelosi, R. & Killer, E. Management of citrus root weevils (coleoptera: Curculionidae) on florida citrus with soil-applied entomopathogenic nematodes (nematoda: Rhabditida). Florida Entomologist 1–7 (1999).
Koppenhöfer, A. M. & Fuzy, E. M. Steinernema scarabaei for the control of white grubs. Biol. Control 28, 47–59 (2003).
Grewal, P., Power, K., Grewal, S., Suggars, A. & Haupricht, S. Enhanced consistency in biological control of white grubs (coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) with new strains of entomopathogenic nematodes. Biol. Control 30, 73–82 (2004).
Georgis, R. et al. Successes and failures in the use of parasitic nematodes for pest control. Biol. Control 38, 103–123 (2006).
Labaude, S. & Griffin, C. T. Transmission success of entomopathogenic nematodes used in pest control. Insects 9, 72 (2018).
Li, X.-Y., Cowles, R., Cowles, E., Gaugler, R. & Cox-Foster, D. Relationship between the successful infection by entomopathogenic nematodes and the host immune response. Int. J. Parasitol. 37, 365–374 (2007).
Castillo, J. C., Reynolds, S. E. & Eleftherianos, I. Insect immune responses to nematode parasites. Trends Parasitol. 27, 537–547 (2011).
Ribeiro, C. et al. Insect immunity-effects of factors produced by a nematobacterial complex on immunocompetent cells. J. Insect Physiol. 45, 677–685 (1999).
Garriga, A., Mastore, M., Morton, A., Garcia del Pino, F. & Brivio, M. F. Immune response of drosophila suzukii larvae to infection with the nematobacterial complex steinernema carpocapsae-xenorhabdus nematophila. Insects 11, 210 (2020).
Ebrahimi, L., Niknam, G., Dunphy, G. & Toorchi, M. Side effects of immune response of colorado potato beetle, leptinotarsa decemlineata against the entomopathogenic nematode, steinernema carpocapsae infection. Invertebr. Surviv. J. 11, 132–142 (2014).
Ebrahimi, L., Niknam, G. & Lewis, E. Lethal and sublethal effects of iranian isolates of steinernema feltiae and heterorhabditis bacteriophora on the colorado potato beetle, leptinotarsa decemlineata. Biocontrol 56, 781–788 (2011).
Chen, S., Li, J., Han, X. & Moens, M. Effect of temperature on the pathogenicity of entomopathogenic nematodes (Steinernema and Heterorhabditis spp.) to delia radicum. Biocontrol 48, 713–724 (2003).
Mastore, M., Quadroni, S., Toscano, A., Mottadelli, N. & Brivio, M. F. Susceptibility to entomopathogens and modulation of basal immunity in two insect models at different temperatures. J. Therm. Biol 79, 15–23 (2019).
Wojda, I. Temperature stress and insect immunity. J. Therm. Biol 68, 96–103 (2017).
Lee, J. H., Dillman, A. R. & Hallem, E. A. Temperature-dependent changes in the host-seeking behaviors of parasitic nematodes. BMC Biol. 14, 1–17 (2016).
Girling, R., Ennis, D., Dillon, A. & Griffin, C. The lethal and sub-lethal consequences of entomopathogenic nematode infestation and exposure for adult pine weevils, Hylobius abietis (coleoptera: Curculionidae). J. Invertebr. Pathol. 104, 195–202 (2010).
Mastore, M., Arizza, V., Manachini, B. & Brivio, M. F. Modulation of immune responses of Rhynchophorus ferrugineus (insecta: Coleoptera) induced by the entomopathogenic nematode Steinernema carpocapsae (nematoda: Rhabditida). Insect Sci. 22, 748–760 (2015).
Willett, D. S., Filgueiras, C. C., Nyrop, J. P. & Nault, B. A. Attract and kill: spinosad containing spheres to control onion maggot (Delia antiqua). Pest Manag. Sci. 76, 2720–2725 (2020).
Willett, D. S., Filgueiras, C. C., Nyrop, J. P. & Nault, B. A. Field monitoring of onion maggot (Delia antiqua) fly through improved trapping. J. Appl. Entomol. 144, 382–387 (2020).
Kaya, H. K. & Stock, S. P. Techniques in insect nematology. In Manual of Techniques in Insect Pathology, 281–324 (Elsevier, 1997).
White, G. et al. A method for obtaining infective nematode larvae from cultures. Science (Washington) 66, 302–303 (1927).
R Core Team. R: A. Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing (Vienna, Austria, 2021).
Wickham, H. et al. Welcome to the tidyverse. J. Open Sour. Softw. 4, 1686 (2019). https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01686
Fox, J. & Weisberg, S. An R Companion to Applied Regression third. (Sage, 2019).
Lenth, R. V. emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means, aka Least-Squares Means (2021). R package version 1.5.5-1.
Franceschi, C. et al. Genes involved in immune response/inflammation, igf1/insulin pathway and response to oxidative stress play a major role in the genetics of human longevity: The lesson of centenarians. Mech. Ageing Dev. 126, 351–361 (2005).
Kumar, S. et al. Lifespan extension in C. elegans caused by bacterial colonization of the intestine and subsequent activation of an innate immune response. Dev. Cell 49, 100–117 (2019).
Bruno, P. et al. Entomopathogenic nematodes from Mexico that can overcome the resistance mechanisms of the western corn rootworm. Sci. Rep. 10, 1–12 (2020).
Stock, S. P., Campos-Herrera, R., El-Borai, F. & Duncan, L. Steinernema khuongi n. sp. (panagrolaimomorpha, steinernematidae), a new entomopathogenic nematode species from Florida, USA. J. Helminthol. 93, 226–241 (2019).
Nagelkerke, N. J. et al. A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination. Biometrika 78, 691–692 (1991).
Acknowledgements
Ramom Vasconcelos Pereira, Adalvan D. Martins, and Bo H. Holladay assisted with experiments for this trial. This work was funded by the NYFVI Specialty Crop Block Grant Program awarded to PI Filgueiras. Larry W. Duncan provided the non-NY EPN strains for use in this project.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
C.C.F. and D.S.W. conceived, designed, conducted, and analyzed the experiments for this trial. C.C.F. and D.S.W. wrote this manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Filgueiras, C.C., Willett, D.S. Non-lethal effects of entomopathogenic nematode infection. Sci Rep 11, 17090 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-96270-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-96270-2
This article is cited by
-
Efficacy of a native entomopathogenic nematode Heterorhabditis bacteriophora (isolate Z-1) against potato tuber moth (Phthorimaea operculella (Zeller) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) in Turkey
Egyptian Journal of Biological Pest Control (2023)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.