Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Follow-up of COVID-19 recovered patients with mild disease

Abstract

COVID-19 may manifest as mild, moderate or severe disease with each grade of severity having its own features and post-viral implications. With the rising burden of the pandemic, it is vital to identify not only active disease but any post-recovery complications as well. This study was conducted with the aim of identifying the presence of post-viral symptomatology in patients recovered from mild COVID-19 disease. Presence or absence of 11 post-viral symptoms was recorded and we found that 8 of the 11 studied symptoms were notably more prevalent amongst the female sample population. Our results validate the presence of prolonged symptoms months after recovery from mild COVID-19 disease, particularly in association with the female gender. Hence, proving the post-COVID syndrome is a recognizable diagnosis in the bigger context of the post-viral fatigue syndrome.

Introduction

The SARS-CoV-2 virus has led to a global health crisis ever since the first case of COVID-19 was reported in November 2012 in Wuhan, China1. COVID-19 primarily targets the respiratory system with variable initial symptoms including fever, sore throat, flu-like illness, and diarrhea2. There is a chance that some symptoms may linger even after the convalescence phase has subsided. The presence of symptoms after recovery from a viral disease is broadly recognized as a post-viral syndrome3. To date, various viruses have been associated with this syndrome, including the Coxsackie B virus, Epstein Bar virus, Influenza virus, Candida albicans, Borrelia burgdorferi, Enterovirus, Cytomegalovirus, Human Herpesvirus, Retrovirus, Borna virus, and Hepatitis C virus (HCV)4. The SARS outbreak in 2003 was due to a virus from the same RNA virus family as SARS-CoV-2, which has an established correlation with the development of several lingering symptoms after recovery from the acute infection5. Some reported symptoms include, malaise, myalgias, lack of concentration, and sleep disturbances.

A 131 patient based study in Wuhan revealed that 29% of their patients had persistence of symptoms after a 2-week post-discharge follow up6. This is one excerpt that provides evidence of this syndrome being present in COVID-19 patients; hence, we aimed to validate it further. With the third wave of COVID-19 pandemic rising in several parts of the world on a background of possible prolonged symptoms in previously affected patients, the disease burden will only increase. Hence, it is important to recognize not just active disease but the prevailing effects of prior disease in recovered patients as well.

Materials and methods

The study participants were patients who accessed the health services at our hospital with mild COVID-19 disease. These patients were either admitted and discharged, or advised home quarantine to begin with. While consecutively including patients in the study, we confined our sample to those who presented with mild COVID-19 disease only, confirmed with a positive reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for SARS-CoV-2 virus (from a nasopharyngeal or throat swab) between April and June, 2020. Mild disease was classified based on the World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines7, defined as:

  1. 1.

    Mild clinical symptoms, i.e. fever < 38 °C (quelled without treatment).

  2. 2.

    With or without cough (no dyspnea, no gasping, no underlying chronic lung disease).

  3. 3.

    No imaging findings of pneumonia.

All patients between the ages of 18 to 65 years, suited to the aforementioned inclusion criteria who consented to participate were enlisted in an electronic patient record, along with their demographic and admission details. The patients were invited for a telephonic follow-up 3 months after being discharged from the hospital or three months after their hospital visit, for patients who were advised home quarantine initially.

Patients with moderate, severe, or critical COVID-19 disease, or those that required intensive care during their admission were excluded from the study. A chest X-ray (CXR) was done for all patients and those having any infiltrates suggestive of pulmonary involvement by SARS-CoV-2 were excluded. Other features that lead to the exclusion were, patients with missing contact details, those lost to follow up, being in-patient at the time of follow-up, and those who failed to give consent to participate when contacted for follow-up. Furthermore, patients who were diagnosed cases of angina, sleep disorders, psychiatric disorders, chronic fatigue syndromes, and neuromuscular disorders were also excluded, along with those who had cognitive or communication impairment that made the telephonic conversation difficult. All participants were also inquired whether they had contracted any other infections during the 3-month window. All patients with concurrent medical illnesses were excluded as well.

A total of 266 patients were contacted, out of which 26 could not be reached out to or were excluded because of the aforementioned reasons. 242 COVID-recovered patients were included in the final sample. Each person was then questioned about the demographic and admission details which were cross-checked with the electronic record to confirm their identity. They were asked open-ended questions regarding their health and feeling of any sort of symptom to identify the general self-reported health status before any formal questioning.

The presence or absence of the following post-viral symptoms was asked and noted: cough, persistent nausea/vomiting, headache, sleep disturbances (such as insomnia and unrefreshing sleep), decreased appetite, chest pain (chest discomfort that did not classify as angina, i.e. did not have the following signs: substernal discomfort of characteristic quality and duration, provoked by exertion or emotional stress and relieved by rest/nitrates), low mood, dizziness, palpitations, myalgias, and fatigability. This list of symptoms was designed after careful review of previous literature on symptoms associated or attributed to post-viral syndrome.

A formal approval from Combined Military Hospital Lahore Ethical Review Board (ERC# 251/2020) was sought prior to initiation of the study and informed consent was taken from all patients. The study was conducted in lines with the principles laid down in the Declaration of Helsinki. Demographic data and comorbidities were recorded as frequency and percentages. Chi-square test was used for comparison between nominal variables. Z-test was used to compare differences between ages. The data was analyzed using SPSSv25.

Results

In total, 242 patients participated in the study, out of which 168 (69.4%) were males and 74 (30.6%) were females. Altogether, the presence of 11 post-viral symptoms was studied. The frequency and percentage of these symptoms is shown in Table 1.

Table 1 Frequency and percentages of various post-COVID symptoms in descending order of prevalence.

The sample was stratified into two groups, those without any co-morbidity and those with co-morbidities present. The studied co-morbidities included diabetes mellitus (DM), hypertension (HTN), and ischemic heart disease (IHD).

Overall, only 29 people reported having one or more comorbidities while the rest of the 213 patients had none, as shown in Table 2. It was also noted that the group of people with comorbid conditions had a mean age of 50.23 ± 12.04 years as compared to the group having no co-morbidities with an average age of 33.65 ± 11.29 years (p < 0.00001). Two of the symptoms were significantly more prevalent amongst the group with co-morbidities, namely, decreased appetite (p = 0.023) and sleep disturbances (p = 0.004).

Table 2 Comparison of symptomatology amongst patients with and without co-morbidities.

Analysis and comparison of symptomatology in accordance with gender was carried out as shown in Table 3. It depicts that 8 of the 11 studied post-viral symptoms had a significantly greater occurrence amongst females as compared to males. These included myalgias, decreased appetite, headache, low mood, nausea/vomiting, chest pain, sleep disturbances, and fatigability. While symptoms including palpitations, cough, and dizziness had no significant variation with gender.

Table 3 Differences in symptomatology amongst males and female participants.

Discussion

While Halpin et al.8 referred to them as “post-discharge” symptoms in a COVID-19 follow-up study, Islam et al. broadly described them as “post-viral fatigue” symptoms9. We aimed to infer whether these symptoms, which include, malaise, myalgias, lack of concentration, sleep disturbances, and others, were present following infection with COVID-19 disease. Existing literature has described the post-viral fatigue in moderate to severe cases of coronavirus recovered patients, it was unclear whether mild cases exhibited similar sequelae. One of the reasons from the rationale of studying mild cases only, was that Demeco et al.10 reported that in the majority, 81% of patients, COVID confers a mild disease. In addition, Garg et al.11 suggested in an editorial that a subgroup analysis of only mild COVID-19 patients would provide more insight to the post-viral fatigue syndrome as there is a scarce chance of chronic organ impairment in these cases. Therefore, in this study we aimed to identify residual symptoms in patients who recovered from mild COVID-19 disease due to infection by the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

Though a number of studies are still underway, and no consensus has been reached regarding the cut-off for how long the post-viral symptoms persist, following are some notable reported narratives. A study in Wuhan of 131 patients found that 29% of their patients had persistence of symptoms at a two week follow up6. Carfi et al.12 reported that, 87.4% recovered patients had persistence of at least one symptom, particularly fatigue and dyspnea at an average of 48 days post-discharge. In a survey led by the center for disease control and prevention (CDC) COVID-19 response team, amongst symptomatic adults with mild disease patients, 35% of the participants had not returned to their usual baseline health at 14–21 days after testing positive, with 47% amongst these being ≥ 50-years old13.

Halpin et al.8 observed that fatigue was the most commonly occurring symptom during follow-up for both ward (60.3%) and ICU (72%) patients, followed by respiratory symptoms (shortness of breath), while in our study, respiratory sequelae (cough and chest pain) were the least prevalent. It should be taken into consideration that moderate to severe cases of coronavirus can result in diffuse lung injury, pulmonary infiltrates along with respiratory distress. Furthermore, patients in ICU settings may require mechanical ventilation secondary to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and pulmonary fibrosis. It can be inferred that persistence of respiratory symptoms seen in such cases may stem from long-term lung injury associated with more severe forms of the disease and hence, were not observed in our cohort.

A notable result from our study was the occurrence of sleep disturbances in 18.3% of healthy and in 41.4% of patients with existing co-morbidities, which was a statically significant finding (p = 0.00427). This renders that a strong correlation exists between disordered sleep and the presence of co-morbidities in patients recovering from COVID-19 infection. Altered sleep patterns have previously been reported by Moldofsky et al.5 who documented the presence of non-restorative, unrefreshing sleep for as long as 19.5 months in patients suffering from the chronic post-SARS syndrome (2003). Another study by Xiong et al. reported 17.7% of their COVID-19 survivor cohort had sleep disorders14. This goes to show that disordered sleep is a commonly occurring consequence of COVID-19 infection. This can be owing to isolation during lockdown, social distancing from family and friends and phobias associated with the pandemic.

There was an evident association of majority of the symptoms, specifically, decreased appetite, chest pain, headache, low mood, sleep disturbances, fatigability, myalgias, and nausea/vomiting with female gender. Similarly, Xiong et al.14 related physical decline/fatigue, post-activity polypnea and alopecia as being significantly more common in female survivors. Thus, an association of post-COVID sequelae with gender exists and demands further research.

We acknowledge some shortcomings in our study. Ours was a single-center study with a small sample size and the findings weren’t compared with a control group. Moreover, there always exists some element of recall bias with follow-up studies. Although, in more severe forms of the disease, the occurrence of the cytokine storm has proven to be a predictor of chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) like symptoms in COVID-19 survivors, whereas, for less severe forms of the disease, there is still a need to study the pathogenesis leading to the occurrence of the post-COVID syndrome which cannot be explained entirely by the cytokine storm. Lastly, it is important to include various ethnicities and socio-demographically diverse groups in study samples to study the association of the post-COVID syndrome with the ethnicity.

Conclusion

We reported various post-viral sequelae, the most common being fatigue, in mild-COVID-19 recovered patients 3 months after being discharged. The existence of post-COVID recovery symptoms warrants recognition of COVID-19 as a cause of post-viral fatigue syndrome, even in mild forms of the disease. This can help clinicians to plan arrangements such as follow-up visits, rehabilitation, cognitive behavioral therapy, and even simple measures like incorporation of counseling sessions at discharge to reduce patient anxiety regarding extended symptoms.

References

  1. 1.

    Ahn, D. G. et al. Current status of epidemiology, diagnosis, therapeutics, and vaccines for novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 30(3), 313–324. https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2003.03011 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Yi, Y., Lagniton, P. N. P., Ye, S., Li, E. & Xu, R. H. COVID-19: What has been learned and to be learned about the novel coronavirus disease. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 16(10), 1753–1766. https://doi.org/10.7150/ijbs.45134 (2020).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Archer, M. I. The post-viral syndrome: A review. J. R. Coll. Gen. Pract. 37(298), 212–214 (1987).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Avellaneda Fernández, A. et al. Chronic fatigue syndrome: Aetiology, diagnosis and treatment. BMC Psychiatry 9(Suppl 1), S1. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-9-S1-S1 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Moldofsky, H. & Patcai, J. Chronic widespread musculoskeletal pain, fatigue, depression and disordered sleep in chronic post-SARS syndrome; a case-controlled study. BMC Neurol. 11, 37. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2377-11-37 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Wang, X. et al. Clinical features and outcomes of discharged coronavirus disease 2019 patients: A prospective cohort study. QJM Int. J. Med. 113(9), 657–665. https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hcaa178 (2020).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Zu, Z. Y. et al. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): A perspective from China. Radiology 296, E15–E25. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2020200490 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Halpin, S. J. et al. Postdischarge symptoms and rehabilitation needs in survivors of COVID-19 infection: A cross-sectional evaluation. J. Med. Virol. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.26368 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Islam, M. F., Cotler, J. & Jason, L. A. Post-viral fatigue and COVID-19: Lessons from past epidemics. Fatigue Biomed. Health Behav. 8(2), 61–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/21641846.2020.1778227 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Demeco, A. et al. Rehabilitation of patients post-COVID-19 infection: A literature review. J. Int. Med. Res. 48(8), 300060520948382. https://doi.org/10.1177/0300060520948382 (2020).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Garg, P., Arora, U., Kumar, A. & Wig, N. The, “post-COVID” syndrome: How deep is the damage? J. Med. Virol. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.26465 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Carfì, A., Bernabei, R. & Landi, F. Gemelli against COVID-19 Post-Acute Care Study Group. Persistent symptoms in patients after acute COVID-19. JAMA 324(6), 603–605. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.12603 (2020).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Tenforde, M. W. et al. Symptom duration and risk factors for delayed return to usual health among outpatients with COVID-19 in a multistate health care systems network—United States, March–June 2020. Morb. Mortal Wkly. Rep. 69, 993–998. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6930e1externalicon (2020).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Xiong, Q. et al. Clinical sequelae of COVID-19 survivors in Wuhan, China: A single-centre longitudinal study. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2020.09.023 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

A.K.—project lead; M.C., T.F. and M.A.—writing the manuscript; A.M.—data collection and manuscript editing; J.M.A.A., S.H.A.I., T.F. and K.S.—data collection; N.I.—proof reading and formatting the manuscript and tables.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad Abdullah.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kashif, A., Chaudhry, M., Fayyaz, T. et al. Follow-up of COVID-19 recovered patients with mild disease. Sci Rep 11, 13414 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-92717-8

Download citation

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing