Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Transmitting silks of maize have a complex and dynamic microbiome

Abstract

In corn/maize, silks emerging from cobs capture pollen, and transmit resident sperm nuclei to eggs. There are > 20 million silks per U.S. maize acre. Fungal pathogens invade developing grain using silk channels, including Fusarium graminearum (Fg, temperate environments) and devastating carcinogen-producers (Africa/tropics). Fg contaminates cereal grains with mycotoxins, in particular Deoxynivalenol (DON), known for adverse health effects on humans and livestock. Fitness selection should promote defensive/healthy silks. Here, we report that maize silks, known as styles in other plants, possess complex and dynamic microbiomes at the critical pollen-fungal transmission interval (henceforth: transmitting style microbiome, TSM). Diverse maize genotypes were field-grown in two trial years. MiSeq 16S rRNA gene sequencing of 328 open-pollinated silk samples (healthy/Fg-infected) revealed that the TSM contains > 5000 taxa spanning the prokaryotic tree of life (47 phyla/1300 genera), including nitrogen-fixers. The TSM of silk tip tissue displayed seasonal responsiveness, but possessed a reproducible core of 7–11 MiSeq-amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) dominated by a single Pantoea MiSeq-taxon (15–26% of sequence-counts). Fg-infection collapsed TSM diversity and disturbed predicted metabolic functionality, but doubled overall microbiome size/counts, primarily by elevating 7–25 MiSeq-ASVs, suggestive of a selective microbiome response against infection. This study establishes the maize silk as a model for fundamental/applied research of plant reproductive microbiomes.

Introduction

In both plants and humans, reproduction requires maternal exposure to the environment to facilitate sperm entry (female reproductive tract), thereby also creating an entry point for pathogens1,2. In humans, disruptions in the microbiomes of the vaginal-cervical-uterine-Fallopian tube tract have been associated with disease, infertility and pre-term birth3,4. In plants, the female reproductive tract includes exposed papillae (stigma), on which pollen land and germinate, connected to a long channel (style) that terminates in an egg sac; sperm nuclei exit the pollen, then travel to the egg within a tubular extension of the pollen (pollen tube) inside the style channel5. There are limited reports of cultured microbes and/or microbiomes associated with the stigma and style from a few plants, including pear6, the wild tree Metrosideros polymorpha7, wild monkeyflowers8 and apples9.

In cultivated maize (corn, Zea mays L.), one of the world’s three most important food crops, the style is called the silk, recognizable as the threads that emerge at the tips of corn cobs. The maize silk is one of the fastest-growing tissues in nature (~ 1–3 mm/h)10. Due to climate change, silk health is becoming more critical to global maize production, because drought inhibits silk growth which prevents synchronization between pollen shed and silk receptivity and thus reduces grain yield11. Silk emergence is also susceptible to low soil nitrogen12, which is particularly limiting in Africa where maize is a staple food crop. Silks have been used for centuries in Mexico, China and elsewhere as herbal medicines for diseases of the urinary tract, arthritis, obesity, and for their anti-microbial activities, associated with a diversity of phytochemicals13.

Silks are also critically important to the world’s maize farmers not only for seed establishment but also because plant insects (including the maize earworm, Helicoverpa zea)14 and pathogens utilize silks as express entry routes to the developing grain2 analogous to Candida invading the vagina15. After fertilization, silks become senescent but remain rich in nutrients2,13, and thus this stage of silk development is particularly susceptible to grain-bound pathogens2. In tropical Africa and Latin America, silk-invaders include the mycotoxin-producing fungal pathogens Aspergillus flavus and Fusarium verticillioides that devastate tens of millions of maize farmers, where they produce carcinogens2,16. In primarily temperate regions, silk-invading F. graminearum (Fg) infection causes Gibberella ear rot16. Fg produces mycotoxins, mainly type B trichothecenes [including deoxynivalenol (DON) and nivalenol (NIV)] and zearalenone (ZEA)—reported for their toxic impacts on gastrointestinal, hematic and reproductive systems, respectively, which impact livestock and human health16. Altered temperature, rainfall, and humidity associated with climate change are expected to increase Fg-based mycotoxins in maize17.

Despite the importance of styles/silks to both reproduction and global grain disease, there are no reports in the literature about the microbiome of silks. Maize silks are environmentally exposed and unusually long (up to 30 cm)5, and hence an excellent model for style microbiome research. Silks would be an ideal habitat for microbes, as they are rich in lipids, proteins, carbohydrates, minerals, and vitamins, and have a high moisture content13. Endophytic microbes inhabiting other tissues in maize and its relatives have been shown to combat Fg18,19,20,21,22. There may have been even stronger selection pressure to recruit protective microbes within the actual entry/transmission point of Fg and other pathogens/pests, as well as additional microbes to protect the tissue against environmental stress (e.g. drought, nutrients), given its critical importance to reproduction. However, the rapid growth rate of silk tissue and its exposure to a fluctuating environment raise questions as to whether silks/styles can establish a microbiome and whether it would be stable.

Here, we test: (1) whether maize silks at the pollen-fungal transmission interval possess core microbiomes within the spatial tip to base gradient; (2) whether these microbiomes are stable across field spatial blocks, trial years and diverse host genotypes; and (3) whether Fg invasion using artificial spore inoculation disrupts the transmitting silk microbiome and/or elicits increases in potential protective microbes (Fg-indicator taxa). Here, the microbiome was analyzed in open pollinated silks to mimic maize production in farmers’ fields after pollination when Fg primarily enters. We henceforth refer to this as the transmitting style microbiome (TSM), the microbiome associated with silks at the interval encompassing pollination and Fg transmission.

Results

Exploration of the healthy transmitting silk microbiome (TSM)

To determine whether healthy transmitting silks have a stable microbiome, 14 diverse maize genotypes (primarily exhibiting some degree of silk resistance to Fg), spanning 7 heterotic breeding groups (Supplementary Table S1), were grown in 3 spatial field blocks for 2 years (weather data: Supplementary Figs. S1, S2). Silks were harvested from 3 randomly selected cobs per block and pooled, with husk leaf-protected silk tip and base tissues first separated (Fig. 1a–c), resulting in 163 genomic DNA samples. After quality filtering, there were ~ 3 million 16S rRNA (V4 region) read counts (Supplementary Table S2). Fastq files of obtained sequences were deposited in Genbank under the BioProject accession no. PRJNA601168. Silk tip genomic DNA isolation was prioritized, using a DNeasy Plant Mini kit (Qiagen, USA), which resulted in sufficient yields for MiSeq; however subsequent silk base DNA isolations showed low yields using this method, causing us to adapt a higher-yielding CTAB protocol with more starting tissue. When tested on the same split samples (as a control), the Qiagen kit method was observed to produce greater microbial diversity than the CTAB method (Supplementary Fig. S3). Therefore, for this study, we have bioinformatically analyzed and presented each tissue location (tip vs base) separately and avoided direct comparisons. In general, the silk base tissue results may be underestimating microbial diversity.

Figure 1
figure1

Composition of the transmissible style microbiome (TSM) of healthy maize silks. (a) Photo of maize cob with husk leaves protecting silks; (b) Peeled away husk leaves revealing/exposing silk threads; (c) Locations of base and tip silk tissues used in this study. (d) Contribution of dominant bacterial phyla in healthy TSM based on calculated relative abundance (RA) ≥ 1% using 16S read counts. (e, f) Heat tree displays of the core microbiomes of healthy transmitting silks harvested in 2016 from the (e) silk tip and (f) silk base (see Supplementary Fig. S5c, e for 2017). Core taxa (prevalent ≥ 50% of silk samples) are displayed in a hierarchal taxonomic heat tree from kingdom to species. The color depth and node size indicate the number of bacterial taxa within each taxonomic node or branch.

In both tip and base silk tissues, the most dominant bacterial phylum was Proteobacteria (which occupied ~ 78–88% of all 16S read counts in both 2016 and 2017 based on relative abundance, RA), followed far behind by Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes and Actinobacteria (RA > 1%) (Fig. 1d). Within the Proteobacteria, the most dominant class, order and genus, respectively, were Gammaproteobacteria, Enterobacteriales and Pantoea (Table 1, Supplementary Table S3a, b). Healthy silks, when combined, were inhabited by 5152 unique bacterial (99.8%) and archaea taxa (0.2%) belonging to 1296 genera spanning the Prokaryotic Tree of Life23 (Supplementary Fig. S4). The results showed the existence of reproducible core tip and base TSM (taxa prevalent in at least 50% of samples) traversing the maize genotypes and field years (Fig. 1e, f; Supplementary Fig. S5c, e, Supplementary Fig. S6). There were surprising TSM inhabitants such as widespread nitrogen-fixing bacteria including Rhizobium, Herbaspirillum and Azospirillum (Table 1, Fig. 1e, f, Supplementary Fig. S6a–d).

Table 1 Summary of TSM taxa at genus level inhabiting silk tip tissues with mean relative abundance of > 1% in at least one of the 4 sample groups.

Trial year impacts on the healthy transmitting silk microbiome

The relative abundance of the dominant taxa was consistent across years (Table 1; Supplementary Table S3a, b; Fig. 2a, c, e, g) providing evidence for the stability of dominant TSM taxa (e.g. including Pantoea and Acinetobacter OTUs). This stability was confirmed by generally non-significant differences in estimates of alpha diversity indices across the different spatial field blocks across 2016 and 2017, with only two exceptions for observed OTUs and Faith’s phylogenetic diversity metric in healthy base tissues in 2017 (Supplementary Table S4). When these two independent statistical measurements are combined, they suggest that the transmitting female reproductive tract of modern maize is inhabited by a complex microbiome from which the dominant taxa are reproducible.

Figure 2
figure2

Impacts of field block location, year and Fg infection on TSM composition. (ah) Bar charts of dominant TSM taxa (relative abundance (RA) ≥ 1%) at 3 field blocks (rep1, rep2, rep3) calculated at the OTU level for healthy transmitting silks in 2016 of (a) tip and (c) base tissues, and 2017 of (e) tip and (g) base tissues, and Fg-infected silks in 2016 of (b) tip and (d) base tissues, and 2017 of (f) tip and (h) base tissues. OTUs with RA < 1% were grouped and labeled as “Others”. Taxa tagged by a red asterisk denote consistent Fg-indicators.

Despite the reproducibility of dominant taxa, a test of beta diversity showed a significant microbiome shift in healthy transmitting silk tips from 2016 to 2017 which could be statistically confirmed to be a trial year effect; this conclusion was less certain for base tissues (Supplementary Table S5a). These results were based on the PERMANOVA (permutational multivariate analysis of variance) test performed using the Bray–Curtis dissimilarity matrix (which provides 16S read count-abundance based measurements of dissimilarity across tested groups), unweighted UniFrac matrix [focuses on rarely shared (less abundant) taxa], and weighted UniFrac matrix (focused on dominant taxa, incorporating both phylogenetic distances along with abundances), followed by validation using the PERMDISP test which confirmed that the within-group dispersion of the data was not significantly different between the years, especially for tip samples (Supplementary Table S5a). The dissimilarities between tested sample groups were visualized by 2D principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) plots. The PCoA plots showed a greater shift in the tip TSM between years compared to base tissues (Fig. 3a, b; Supplementary Fig. S7a–l). Consistent with this result, there was a reduction in the diversity observed in the tip core microbiome in 2017 compared to 2016 (from 21 to 11 taxa) whereas the base was more stable (from 35 to 31 taxa) (Fig. 1e, f, and Supplementary Fig. S5a–f).

Figure 3
figure3

Principal Coordinate Plots (PCoA) of Beta diversity analysis. (ad) 2D PCoA plots that display year-to-year TSM shifts using Bray–Curtis (BC) distance matrix: respectively, (a, b) represent healthy tip and base, and (c, d) represent Fg-infected tip and base (see Supplementary Fig. S7 (a–l) for other matrices where PCoA plots displayed as 5 principal coordinates (vertical lines) and each horizontal coloured line represents one silk sample), (eh) 2D PCoA plots that display TSM shifts upon Fg infection using phylogeny-based distance matrices: (e, f) unweighted UniFrac (UWUF) that focuses on rare taxa in (e) tip tissues (2016), and (f) tip tissues (2017), and (g, h) weighted UniFrac (WUF) that focuses on dominant taxa in (g) tip tissues (2016), (h) tip tissues (2017) (see Supplementary Fig. S11 for other matrices and silk tissues displayed as 5 principal coordinates). pA, and pD denote the calculated p values of PERMANOVA, and PERMDISP tests, respectively (see Supplementary Table S5).

Global impacts of F. graminearum (Fg) infection on the transmitting silk microbiome

To determine the impacts of Fg infection on the TSM, split-plots of all healthy plots (14 maize genotypes, 3 field blocks, 2 years) were artificially inoculated with Fg spores directly onto emerged silks, and then 165 treated samples (tip and base) were analyzed. Surprisingly, silk Fg infection led to a large increase in 16S read counts (from ~ 3 million in healthy transmitting silks to ~ 7 million in infected silks), yet dramatic reductions in the total number of taxa (from 5152 in healthy tissues to 3074 in Fg-infected tissues) (Table S2) confirmed by alpha diversity analysis (healthy vs Fg-infected group significance) (Table S4). The reduction was primarily associated with depletion of rare taxa (< 1% relative abundance) (Fig. S8). At the phyla level, Proteobacteria (especially Gammaproteobacteria) significantly increased in relative abundance while the remaining dominant phyla decreased (Supplementary Figs. S8S10; Supplementary Dataset S1). These estimates were based on calculations performed in STAMP using 2-sided White’s non-parametric t-test adjusted for 2-group comparisons with a Benjamini–Hochberg multiple test correction method using collapsed feature tables (Supplementary Dataset S1).

The corresponding PCoA plots of UniFrac matrices confirmed the contraction in the diversity of the tip TSM upon Fg-infection [Supplementary Fig. S11, unweighted UniFrac that places equal weight on all taxa including rare taxa (defined here as RA < 1%)] and the significant increase in abundance of specific taxa primarily belonging to the phylum Proteobacteria [Supplementary Figs. S9, S10, weighted UniFrac matrix that focuses on dominant taxa (defined here as RA > 1%)]. These conclusions also were true in base tissues in both years, as confirmed using Bray–Curtis in particular (Supplementary Table S5b, Supplementary Fig. S12).

In beta diversity analysis, Fg was a greater driver of TSM composition compared to other factors including host genotype (Supplementary Fig. S7m–o). PERMANOVA suggested a significant shift in TSM composition upon Fg infection (Fig. 3e–h, Supplementary Fig. S11). However, there were often significant differences in the level of dispersion between treatment groups (PERMDISP, Supplementary Table S5b), consistent with the dramatic loss of diversity upon Fg infection, which when combined with conserved dominant taxa (Table 1; Fig. 2), caused overlap among the treatment groups in PCoA plots (Fig. 3e–h). The Fg-treated TSM was more sensitive to trial year compared to the TSM from healthy tissues (Fig. 3a–d, Supplementary Fig. S7a–l, Supplementary Table S5).

Together these results show that Fg-infection dramatically reduced overall diversity of the TSM (Supplementary Figs. S8, S12), yet conversely caused a reproducible proliferation of the total microbial population, associated with a small set of core dominant taxa that is resilient to Fg.

Conservation and resiliency of core microbiomes

Overall, the higher-level TSM taxonomic structure, dominated by the core taxa, was resilient to Fg infection across tissues and trial years (Figs. 2a–h, 3g, h; Supplementary Figs. S8, S9). Regardless of treatment, tissue location and year, and based on abundance, the core taxa comprised 0.75–4% of the total taxa count but contributed 65–87% of the total read count of each microbiome (Fig. 4a). Fg infection increased the number of taxa that comprised the tip core microbiome, but decreased the diversity of the base core microbiome, compared to healthy transmitting silks (Fig. 1e, f; Supplementary Fig. S5). Nine abundant OTUs (defined as the shared core TSM) were highly conserved (in at least 50% of the samples) in both healthy and Fg-infected silk tip and base tissues across years belonging to three bacterial classes: Gammaproteobacteria [Pantoea (OTU25), Enterobacteriaceae family (OTU2, OTU3, OTU6), Pseudomonas (OTU28), Stenotrophomonas (OTU34) and Acinetobacter (OTU31)], Alphaproteobacteria (Sphingomonas, OTU35) and Bacilli (Lactococcus, OTU36) (Fig. 4b–d). Of these, Pantoea (OTU25) was the most prevalent taxon, detected in almost all healthy and infected samples (327/328 samples).

Figure 4
figure4

Dominance and prevalence of the core TSM. (a) Bar chart representing the percent contribution of the core microbiomes to their corresponding microbial communities. (b) Mean relative abundance (RA) of the most dominant and prevalent TSM taxa. (c, d) Venn diagrams of the shared taxa of core TSM: respectively, (c) tip core TSM, and (d) base core TSM.

To identify candidate microbial networks within the core TSM, Spearman’s rank correlations were used to identify strong co-occurring taxa (coefficient ≥ 0.6 and p-value ≤ 0.0001) (Fig. 5a, b; Supplementary Fig. S13). In general, Fg infection weakened the co-occurrences between core taxa, especially in the silk base. While the trial year and Fg infection affected co-occurring taxa, Sphingomonas (OTU35) was consistently the strongest co-occurring taxa. Across tissue samples, OTU35 repeatedly associated with Pseudomonas (OTU29, OTU68), suggestive of a consortium, and inconsistently with other core microbiome taxa (see Indicator Bacterial Taxa section below). These results suggest that OTU35 forms the hub of the core TSM.

Figure 5
figure5

Co-occurrence of core TSM in healthy and Fg-infected states. (a, b) Co-occurrence of core taxa displaying calculated Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients in 2017 for (a) healthy base tissues and (b) Fg-infected base tissues (also see Supplementary Fig. S13a–f).Taxa tagged by a red asterisk denote Fg-indicators in silk base, 2017.

Identification of Fusarium-indicator bacterial taxa

Given the overall proliferation of the TSM in response to Fg, next we identified the specific taxa that were responsible for this proliferation, hypothesizing that these taxa may protect the host tissue against Fg attack. We computed the log2 fold change of taxa abundance using the DESeq2 R package at an adjusted p-value < 0.05 (Supplementary Information). Interestingly, the taxa that increased consistently in both 2016 and 2017 in response to Fg infection (Supplementary Table S6) were generally members of the core TSM (both healthy and/or diseased state), specifically Enterobacteriaceae (OTU2, OTU3, OTU4), Herbaspirillum (OTU7), Delftia (OTU8), Stenotrophomonas (OTU34), and Sphingomonas (OTU35) (identified above as the microbiome hub) (Fig. 6a–d). Other taxa that increased in only a single year included consistent core members such as Pantoea OTU25 (the most prevalent taxa in the TSM) and Enterobacteriaceae (OTU6).

Figure 6
figure6

TSM OTUs that significantly change in abundance after exposure to Fusarium graminearum infection. (ad) Heatmaps of OTUs (Fg-indicator taxa) that significantly changed in abundance upon Fg infection (Log2 fold change of 16S read counts at p value ≥ 0.05) in (a) silk tip tissues (2016), (b) silk tip tissues (2017), (c) silk base tissues (2016), and (d) silk base tissues (2017). X-axis represents samples of silk tissues. Impacts of Fg infection on TSM predicted metabolic pathways. (e, f) Venn diagrams displaying year-to-year sharing of predicted TSM metabolic pathways that significantly changed upon Fg infection of (e) silk tip tissues, and (f) silk base tissues (see Supplementary Table S7 for pathway information, and Supplementary Fig. S16 for extended error bars).

The indicator results were independently confirmed using the q2-sample-classifier, a plugin in a supervised machine learning method (Qiime2 platform) for predicting sample characteristics based on the change in microbiome composition upon Fg infection. The top 20 important features/OTUs that distinguish between healthy and Fg-infected samples were selectively visualized in heatmaps along with Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristics (AUROC) graphs to check the performance of the classification model (Supplementary Figs. S14, S15). The predictions showed that tip sample groups had 14 OTUs that overlapped across trial years including the Fusarium-indicator taxa calculated above (using the Deseq2 R package) along with other taxa, mostly part of the shared core including Pseudomonas (OTU28) and Lactococcus (OTU36). For the silk base tissues, only 3 OTUs [F_Enterobacteriaceae (OTU4), Pseudomonas (OTU29), and Methylobacterium (OTU48)] were shared across trial years with a lower discrimination capacity between the healthy and Fg-infected tissue samples (Supplementary Fig. S15).

Some of the Fusarium-indicator taxa strongly but inconsistently co-occurred with OTU35 (coefficient ≥ 0.6 and    p-value  ≤ 0.0001) in Fg-infected tissues, suggestive of a silk-protecting consortium of up to 8 taxa as candidate members, including F_Enterobacteriaceae (OTU4, OTU17), Pantoea (OTU25), and Delftia (OTU8) (Fig. 5a, b; Supplementary Fig. S13).

Shifts in predicted metabolic pathways upon Fusarium infection

Taking into account all sample groups, the reduction in TSM taxa upon Fg infection was associated with a reduction in 44 bacterial metabolic pathways and an increase in only one pathway (silk base 2016; dTDP-6-deoxy-α-d-allose biosynthesis). Nine pathways were consistent across years in the tip, and two pathways were consistent in the base tissue (Fig. 6e, f, Supplementary Fig. S16, Supplementary Table S7). Specifically, Fg infection was predicted to cause the loss of 17 antibiotic biosynthesis pathways along with additional pathways related to macronutrient cycling (carbohydrates, amino acids, phospholipids) (Supplementary Fig. S16, Supplementary Table S7). These predictions were obtained from bioinformatic metabolic pathway analysis (q2-picrust2, STAMP)24,25 using 2-sided White’s non-parametric t-test adjusted for 2-group comparisons with a Bonferroni’s correction method.

Discussion

A healthy style is essential for plant sexual reproduction. Ancient peoples of the Americas selected for elongated corn styles (silks) and understood their importance, depicting them as hairs on deity statues26. Today, we estimate that there are > 4000 km of silks per U.S. acre of corn. Here we reported that the transmitting style microbiome (TSM) of maize is dynamic and complex, spanning the prokaryotic tree of life (Supplementary Fig. S4)23. The TSM population was observed to host 1,300 bacterial genera, but surprisingly only 7–11 taxa accounted for ~ 45–69% of the entire microbiome based on mean relative abundance (Fig. 4b). Nine of these were amongst the most widespread silk taxa, prevalent across diverse temperate maize genotypes, spatial field blocks, trial year, and fungal attack (Fig. 4c, d). Six of the most abundant taxa belong to one evolutionary branch (Enterobacteriales), including OTU25 (Pantoea) which occupied 15–26% of the healthy TSM and was prevalent across 99% of all silk samples (Fig. 4b).

Taxonomic comparison to previous studies

Taxonomically, the TSM showed some similarities but also significant differences compared to the style microbiomes of other plants. Similar to a recent elegant study involving apple styles9, we observed that Proteobacteria dominated the TSM, in particular the Enterobacteriaceae (Fig. 1, Table 1). However, in apple styles, whereas the only other dominant family was the Pseudomonadaceae, here the other dominant and consistent families included not only Pseudomonadaceae, but also Moraxellaceae, Burkholderiaceae, Sphingomonadaceae, Xanthomonadaceae, Acetobacteraceae (Table 1, Supplementary Table S3). Perhaps this difference is explained by the narrow sampling of the apple study (9 trees of one cultivar). In the wild Hawaiian tree, Metrosideros polymorpha, the styles and stamens of 33 individual trees were dominated by Enterobacteriaceae, Bradyrhizobiaceae, Staphylococcaceae, Micrococcaceae, Porphyromonadaceae, Rhodobacteraceae, and Sphingomonadaceae7, showing some overlap but also differences to the maize TSM. In wild monkeyflowers (Mimulus guttatus), the stamens and styles were dominated by OTUs from the Pseudomonadales order, with core microbes including Acinetobacter, Pseudomonas, Bacteroides and Corynebacterium8. Cultured epiphytic bacteria from pear styles were dominanted by Pseudomonas6. Unlike the maize TSM, a hallmark of these previous studies7,9 is significant variation among samples of dominant microbes, even from a narrow host genotype9, perhaps because the stigma and style tissues sampled were all exposed to the environment unlike this current study.

Potential functions of the transmitting style microbiome

There may have been strong long-term selection pressure on the TSM to increase host fitness by assisting the style to achieve successful fertilization and to reduce its vulnerability to invading pests and pathogens, well known for maize silks. Interestingly, many of the top 50 dominant TSM genera (based on relative abundance, Supplementary Fig. S6, Table 1, Supplementary Table S3a, b) were previously reported as biocontrol agents18,27,28,29,30 including those shown to have anti-Fusarium activity via diverse biological mechanisms31,32 (elaborated below). Specific dominant TSM genera (Bacillus, Paenibacillus, Serratia and Pseudomonas) are known to produce volatile compounds (e.g., 2,3-butanediol) that elicit the host immune response33,34. Some of the dominant TSM taxa were previously reported to secrete insecticides [e.g., Bacillus (mainly B. thuringiensis), Paenibacillus, Serratia, Pseudomonas, Burkholderia, Streptomyces] against a variety of pests including armyworms and corn rootworms35. In terms of abiotic stress, silk growth is impeded by low nitrogen availability, perhaps explaining the surprising presence of many well-known nitrogen-fixing genera including Rhizobium, Bradyrhizobium, Herbaspirillum, Azospirillum, Methylobacterium, Bacillus, Paenibacillus, Brevundimonas, Massilia, Achromobacter, and Novosphingobium36. Similarly, maize silk growth is highly susceptible to drought, and the top 50 genera in silks include those previously shown to increase in abundance under drought in the roots of 19 grasses including maize (e.g. Stenotrophomonas, Serratia, Achromobacter, Sphingobacterium, Streptomyces, Staphylococcus, Paenibacillus, and Bacillus)37. These and other core genera (Pantoea, Sphingomonas, Burkholderia, Enterobacter, Azospirillum) have been shown to promote drought tolerance in plants38,39,40. For example, mechanistically, Azospirillum has been shown to trigger abscisic acid production38, while Rhizobium upregulates trehalose-6-phosphate synthase39. It is also interesting to speculate whether the dominant genera contribute to the extraordinarily rapid growth of silks, analogous to root-stimulating rhizobacteria, as several of these (Pseudomonas, Serratia, Stenotrophomonas, Bacillus, Paenibacillus, Rhizobium, Sphingomonas) synthesize growth phytohormones such as indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), cytokinin, and/or gibberellins41. Other core taxa may be regulating the silk response to abiotic/biotic stress by modulating ethylene levels41. Perhaps some of the well-known silk medicinal and phytochemical compounds used by traditional societies including in silk teas13,42 are actually associated with the silk microbiome, alone or interacting with the host, to serve some of the host-protective or ecological functions noted above. Finally, it will be interesting to test whether members of the TSM assist or interfere in reproduction directly, perhaps as a vestige of early plant evolution. For example, some silk taxa produce compounds known to be required for pollen tube attraction to the embryo sac, including gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) (Lactobacillus, Lactococcus)43, or they may secrete enzymes implicated in pollen grain penetration into the silk (e.g. xylanase by Pantoea)44, or polypeptides with β-expansin activity needed for stigma penetration and pollen tube growth to the egg sac (e.g., Bacillus, Streptococcus, Streptomyces, Staphylococcus, Enterococcus, Lactobacillus, Lactococcus, Clostridium, E. coli, Pseudomonas and Flavobacterium)45.

Interaction between the TSM and Fusarium pathogen

Fusarium graminearum silk infection resulted in a dramatic reduction in TSM diversity (Table 1, Supplementary Table S3a, b) but also a doubling in total 16S read counts (Supplementary Table S2). This is contradictory to apples, where exposure of stigma/style tissue to the pathogen Erwinia amylovora resulted in a shift in the microbiome composition, but no significant effect on microbiome community diversity compared to the water control9. There are several possible reasons for the diversity loss observed here. First, Fg may be competing for specific nutrients. Second, Fg-derived mycotoxins/antibiotics may be killing specific classes of bacteria or disrupting bacterial cell–cell communication (Quorum Sensing) responsible for networking46,47. Indeed, upon Fg infection, there was an observable reduction in the co-occurrence of core TSM members (i.e. disruption of the core network) (Fig. 5, Supplementary Fig. S13). Third, silk cells may be emitting damaging reactive oxygen species during the host defence response which some bacterial taxa are sensitive to. Finally, perhaps the rare taxa provide a diverse genetic repertoire to improve host fitness under different environmental stresses48, but upon artificial Fusarium infection only a core protective microbiome is amplified (Fig. 6a–d, Supplementary Fig. S15). In fact, 7 taxa were consistently and significantly responsible for the increased abundance upon infection (indicator taxa), including members of the core microbiomes (Fig. 4c, d). We previously showed that an Enterobacter sp. could suppress Fg when sprayed onto silk tips20, consistent with the finding here that Enterobacteriaceae species (OTU2, OTU3, OTU4) consistently increased in abundance upon Fg attack in silk tips20. Similarly, several of these taxa have previously been reported to suppress Fusarium species including: Pseudomonas (OTU50)30; Pantoea (OTU25, the most prevalent and abundant TSM taxa, which significantly increased in abundance in 2017) that was previously shown to exhibit anti-Fusarium activity through a variety of mechanisms including chitinolytic activity and regulation of Fusarium virulence/cell division genes32, 49,50,51; and Delftia (OTU8) that has previously been reported to antagonize diverse fungal pathogens52. In apple, where abundance of an Erwinia pathogen was carefully quantified, no strong correlation was observed between individual silk/style microbiome OTUs and Erwinia titre, leading them to hypothesize that the microbiome regulated pathogen activity rather than its abundance, though the study suffered from significant sample variation9.

It is noteworthy that of the Fg-responsive taxa, Sphingomonas, Pseudomonas sp., Acinetobacter sp., Delftia, and Stenotrophomonas also naturally dominate the human female reproductive tract1 which serves an analogous reproductive function as silks and are similarly invaded by fungal pathogens. Interestingly, Sphingomonas (OTU35) consistently co-occurred across infected and healthy samples, with multiple taxa indicating it as a microbiome-hub in a consortium with Pseudomonas, Acinetobacter and Stenotrophomonas (as well as Pantoea, Rhizobium, Pedobacter, and other members of the Enterobacteriaceae family) (Fig. 5a, b; Supplementary Fig. S13). All these co-occurring taxa were previously reported individually to antagonize Fusarium53,54,55,56,57,58,59. Of note, various anti-Fg strains have additive or synergistic effects, as suggested by previous studies60. Others function by biodegrading and detoxifying Fusarium mycotoxins: for example, Sphingomonas and fluorescent Pseudomonads decrease deoxynivalenol (DON) mycotoxin58,61, while a Lactococcus sp. has been shown to detoxify zearalenone (ZEA) mycotoxin in cereal crops62. Alternatively, some of the Fg-indicator taxa may be inducing host defence, work as part of a consortium, or otherwise directly protect the silk host tissue.

Metabolic pathway predictions suggested that Fg infection resulted in significant loss of TSM functionality, including antibiotic biosynthesis pathways and nutrient recycling pathways (Supplementary Fig. S16; Supplementary Table S7). It may be that Fg-induced dysbiosis depletes the genetic repertoire encoded by the TSM, especially activities not beneficial during fungal pathogen attack (e.g. antibiotic synthesis)48, 63. This result is consistent with the dramatic loss in rare TSM taxa following Fg inoculation.

One limitation of this study was that Agral surfactant was added to the Fusarium treatment but not the control treatment, to help Fusarium spores attach to the silks; we cannot rule out Agral also affected the TSM. However, the Fusarium formulation was applied only to the exposed silks, whereas the collected silk tissues were distal (husk leaf-protected), so, the sampled tissues used for the microbiome study were not directly exposed to Agral. Furthermore, all plants were watered every 8–10 min through installed misting systems during the entire experiment, and thus the Agral was likely washed out immediately.

Year to year variation in the TSM

The anthesis silk interval (ASI)—the difference in timing between silk emergence and pollen shed (synchronization)—critically impacts the success of fertilization and hence grain yield in corn11. Silk emergence is limited by environmental stress including water and nitrogen limitation64. In addition, climatic variability impacts the ASI, potentially causing dramatic reductions in yield64. Here, the recorded fluctuation in climatic conditions across the two years of field trials (Supplementary Figs. S1, S2) was associated with a significant year-to-year shift in the TSM of the silk tip, most likely attributable to shifts of the non-overlapping taxa (Fig. 3a–d; Supplementary Fig. S7a–l, Supplementary Table S5a). These results suggest that the external environment can impact the TSM (Supplementary Table S5a). The impact of seasonality on the stigma/style microbiome was not examined in previous studies in other plants7,8,9, however in apples, it was shown that time after petal opening (and hence presumably environmental exposure) reduced stigma microbiome diversity9. In the current study, there were year-to-year differences in candidate anti-Fg taxa that increased in abundance upon Fg-infection (Fig. 6a–d, Supplementary Table S7). Fg disease severity (gibberella ear rot) and DON mycotoxin levels in corn are well known to vary annually, and it has been very difficult to develop predictive models65. Human/livestock health episodes have been associated with Fg-derived mycotoxins66. This is the first study to suggest that year-to-year fluctuation of the TSM may be a contributing factor to this global threat to human/livestock health, food security and farmer livelihoods. Testing this hypothesis is particularly urgent given climate change.

Summary and future perspectives

In plant reproduction, healthy style tissue at the pollen nuclei transmission stage is critical for successful fertilization5. The style microbiome in the world’s most important cereal crops was not previously reported. Given its inherent advantages compared to many other plants, this study establishes the maize silk as a model for fundamental and applied research of plant reproductive microbiomes including from cereals. The study demonstrates that healthy transmitting maize silks possess thousands of bacterial taxa, which we termed the transmitting silk microbiome (TSM). The TSM is dominated by a small but abundant core microbiome that is prevalent across diverse host genotypes (heterotic groups) in modern maize. Maize silks at the transmission stage are susceptible to pathogen invasion including from Fusarium graminearum (Fg). Despite huge investments made over decades to combat Fg in maize globally, it remains a billion-dollar problem during outbreak years. Here, Fg infection was associated with a dramatic decrease in TSM microbial diversity and perturbed predicted metabolic functionality, but surprisingly a doubling of total TSM read counts, primarily by elevating much of the core microbiome (7–25 MiSeq-ASVs), suggestive of a selective microbiome response against Fusarium. Since the core microbiome dominated read counts, and the rarer taxa varied significantly across samples (sample dispersion), statistically, Fg invasion was not associated with a significant change in TSM community composition, but this masked the actual drama in the microbiome. Future studies are needed to understand whether the elevated TSM taxa are protecting themselves, their host tissues, and/or directly combating Fusarium and its mycotoxins. Given that Fg associated disease severity is known to vary year to year, it is noteworthy that the TSM in silk tips showed significant yearly variation under field conditions. If it is protective, the seasonally dynamic silk microbiome may be part of the problem and solution.

Moving forward, the identification of the healthy TSM and/or a consortium of candidate anti-Fg taxa should be considered as targets for direct selection in maize breeding programs using taxa-specific molecular markers—a novel approach to disease resistance breeding in crops. Such a strategy could also be explored in SubSaharan Africa where silk invading fungal pathogens such as Fusarium and Aspergillus are major sources of human carcinogens67. In temperate regions, DON mycotoxin has been shown to disrupt human and livestock gut microbiomes, in part explaining its gastro-intestinal impacts and its nickname vomitoxin4. Given the results of this study, it is interesting to hypothesize whether the DON antibiosis effect in humans/animals is the indirect byproduct of Fg co-evolving in an arms race with the defensive microbiome of its native plant habitat (e.g. silks). Finally, given the silks in this experiment were open-pollinated, it will be interesting to explore the relative maternal and paternal contributions to the TSM. These and many other fundamental and applied questions now arise that should be explored about the functionality and origin of the TSM as well as the style microbiomes of other plants.

Methods

Field experimental design

A total of 14 corn genotypes were included in this study: eleven were Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC) maize inbred lines, provided by Dr. Lana Reid along with 3 commercial hybrids to add relevance to the study (Supplementary Table S1). These genotypes represent a diversity of heterotic groups in modern maize and have a diversity of resistance to F. graminearum (Fg, Supplementary Table S1). Seeds were grown in the summer of 2016 and 2017 in a completely randomized, split-block design with three replicate blocks, at Ridgetown Station, University of Guelph, Canada. Each open-pollinated block consisted of 2 rows with guard row(s) surrounding all the blocks. Each row had all the genotypes (each 2 m long, with 20 seeds, followed by a small space); in the adjacent paired row, the genotypes were randomized, and hence each genotype had duplicate plots. One of the plots was treated with Fg, while the other was the control. No one row was dedicated to the Fg or control treatments; rather they were randomized across the paired rows within each block, and randomized again between blocks. For each genotype and for each of the 3 blocks, per plot, up to 16 plants (minus the outer 2 plants at each edge) were treated with Fg, while 16 in the adjacent row acted as the control (not sprayed). Pure Fusarium inoculum was applied after silk emergence when the silks of the primary ear presented the first visual signs of senescence (faint brown color) (Supplementary Figs. S1, S2). Approximately 2 ml of Fg inoculum (20,000 spores/ml) was sprayed directly onto the silks from a bottle held at roughly a 3 cm distance. The inoculation date varied between blocks based on this silk maturity criterion, but ranged from August 15–18 in 2016, and August 11–14 in 2017. Each cob was inoculated with Fg twice over 24–48 h. Plots were irrigated using overhead misting prior to and after inoculation until harvest (an automated cycle of 30 s on, and 8–10 min off, from 10:00 to 18:00 h). The system was operated at 206 kPa, and the nozzles delivered approximately 0.6 L/min of water. Harvesting occurred on August 25 in 2016, and August 21 in 2017. For silk sampling, 3 cobs from each plot (3 separate plants) were chosen randomly that were also representative of the average cob size for that plot. In the lab, under sterile conditions, silks from all 3 cobs per plot were pooled and frozen at − 80 °C for later DNA isolation (see Tissue harvesting and DNA isolation, below). The weather information was obtained from the official website of Government of Canada, Environment and Natural Resources (https://weather.gc.ca/) (Supplementary Figs. S1, S2).

Fusarium spore isolation and inoculum preparation

Three local Fg isolates were used to prepare pure inoculum under in vitro sterile conditions: one isolate from infected corn and two from wheat from Southern Ontario, Canada . All three isolates produced clear disease symptoms in their respective hosts during the previous growing season. The Fg strains were purified via serial subculturing on PDA agar plates. First, the seeds were surface-sterilized, then plated for several days. The leading edge of the fungal growth was picked for culturing on fresh PDA agar plates. The spores were then harvested, and diluted until single spores could be resolved on water agar. For further purification, single spores were picked and plated individually on fresh PDA agar plates as a pure culture per spore. To confirm the purity of spores prior to the inoculum preparation, they were microscopically identified, then small cubes were aseptically cut from the plates and used to inoculate flasks of autoclaved spore broth (modified Bilay’s medium)68 then incubated for 3–5 days at 25 °C under shaking. The fungal spores from each flask were visualized under the microscope and counted using a hemocytometer to check the purity and to adjust the spore suspension concentration. To prepare the final cocktail of Fg spores, each of the three adjusted spore suspensions was combined equally to produce a final suspension concentration of 20,000 spores/ml, then 1.0% v/v Agral ® 90 (Syngenta Canada Inc.) was added as a surfactant.

Tissue harvesting and DNA isolation

For every single replicate, three ears were harvested from each subplot in the summer season (Supplementary Fig. S1). The exposed silk tissues were removed from each cob and the length of each ear was measured to be cut into three equal portions (Fig. 1c). Then the silk tip (front portion) tissues were pooled separately from the silk base tissues (back portion), and each was consolidated in a single Petri dish and marked with a unique sample ID. All samples were stored at − 80 °C for DNA isolation. Qiagen DNeasy Plant Mini Kit was used for DNA extraction from silk tips (100 mg of tissue according to the kit protocol), whereas a CTAB protocol (see Supplementary Information) was used for silk base tissues (300 mg), because the yield from the Qiagen kit from base tissues was insufficient for high throughput 16S rRNA sequencing69. Then, DNA samples were quantified using a Qubit v1.2 fluorometer.

16S rRNA amplicon sequencing using MiSeq technology and sequences analysis

DNA samples were submitted to Metagenom Bio Inc. (Waterloo, Canada) for high throughput 16S amplicon sequencing using the Illumina MiSeq platform. Hypervariable region V4 of 16S rRNA genes were amplified using the barcoded primer sets, 515FB: GTGYCAGCMGCCGCGGTAA, 806RB: GGACTACNVGGGTWTCTAAT70. PCR was conducted in triplicate for each sample (25 μl each). Each reaction mixture contained 2.5 μl of 10 × standard Taq buffer (New England Biolabs), 0.5 μl of 10 mM dNTP, 5 μl of 1 μM forward primer, 5 μl of 1 μM reverse primer, 1 μl of 25 μM pPNA, 1 μl of 25 μM mPNA71 (PNA Bio Inc, Newbury Park, CA), 2 μl DNA, 0.2 μl of BSA (20 mg/ml), 0.2 μl of Taq DNA polymerase (5 units/μl, NEB) and 7.6 μl of PCR water. DNA was denatured at 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles of 95 °C for 30 s, 50 °C for 30 s and 72 °C for 50 s, and then extended at 72 °C for 10 min. Each PCR product representing a correct-size amplicon was gel purified on 2% TAE agarose, quantified using the Qubit dsDNA HS Assay Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.), then the 3 technical replicates were pooled in equimolar amounts. Then, the library DNA was sequenced with a MiSeq Reagent Kit v2 (2 × 250 cycles) and FASTQ files were generated for taxonomic analysis.

Bioinformatic analysis

Generated MiSeq raw reads were assigned to their original samples and quality-controlled using Quantitative Insights Into Microbial Ecology Qiime2 core-2019.10 (https://docs.qiime2.org/2019.10/)72 with plugins demux (https://github.com/qiime2/q2-demux) for demultiplexing and DADA273 to denoise and dereplicate paired-end sequences. Given the use of 2 different DNA extraction protocols, sequences were filtered at different quality scores; QS30 for silk tip sequences and QS25 for silk base sequences. To generate taxonomy tables, the taxonomic assignment was performed using a Naive Bayesian Classifier trained against SILVA-v132 (https://www.arb-silva.de/documentation/release-132/). Representative sequences were aligned and phylogenetic trees were generated using plugins alignment (MAFFT program)74 and phylogeny (FastTree)75, respectively. Data files were exported in QIIME2 and consolidated into a standard format (biom-format)76, then uploaded as a phyloseq object in R for further microbiome analysis and visualization.

Phyloseq (v.1.22.3), metacoder (0.2.1.9005), vegan (v.2.5-2), ggplot2 (v.3.0), and VennDiagram R packages77,78,79,80,81 were used for exploring the maize silk microbiome, and visualizing the core microbiome identified at a 50% prevalence threshold. Diversity analyses (alpha and beta diversity indices) were calculated in Qiime2 platform using the qiime diversity core-metrics-phylogenetic plugin. Principle coordinate analysis (PCoA) was applied on Bray–Curtis and UniFrac distance matrices to visualize the impact of seasonality along with Fg-infection on the dynamics of the transmitting silk microbiome.

Identification of indicator taxa

Taxa that significantly increased in their read counts upon Fg treatment were estimated along with the corresponding log2 fold change (log2 FC) in their abundance and adjusted p-values (significance level, p < 0.05) for multiple testing using the DESeq2 (v.1.18.1) R package82. Taxa with less than a total of 10 counts were excluded from the analysis. Estimations were computed for each tissue silk location in each year, separately. The default multiple inference correction, the Benjamini–Hochberg method, was used; the false discovery rate (FDR) was set to 0.015, and heatmaps of log2 (count + 1) of estimated indicator taxa were constructed and visualized as in Fig. 6a–d. Independently, to confirm the results, the supervised machine learning method in the Qiime2-2019.10 pipeline was used to estimate the top 20 significantly discriminative features between healthy and Fg-infected samples (the most important features of the silk microbiome that changed significantly in abundance upon treatment with Fusarium spores). Generated heatmaps of the top 20 discriminative features (OTUs) were displayed (Supplementary Fig. S15).

Correlation patterns of either healthy or Fg-infected core microbiome

Co-occurrence patterns of the identified core microbiome at a 50% prevalence threshold for each silk tissue location according to fungal pathogen treatment were estimated using the microbiome R package (v.1.0.2)83, based on Spearman’s rank correlation with an adjusted p value threshold of < 0.05. The computed correlation coefficients were visualized using the GGally R package (v.1.4.0)84 as illustrated in Fig. 5, and Supplementary Fig. S13.

Functional inferences of 16S rRNA gene sequences

For metabolic profile prediction of the TSM upon Fg treatment, the q2-picrust2 plugin24 was used through the Qiime2-2019.10 pipeline. PICRUSt2 is a bioinformatic tool used for metagenome inferences from the taxonomic profile of a microbial community to predict its functional composition. The algorithm first aligns amplicon sequence variant (ASV) sequences with the reference 16S rRNA gene sequences using HMMER, then the aligned sequences are placed into a reference phylogenetic tree (generated from reference 16S sequences from the Integrated Microbial Genomes (IMG) database). This phylogenetic tree is used to predict genomes and infer traits for each unknown ASV. In the q2-picrust2 plugin, the output comprises three Qiime2 artifacts: ec_metagenome.qza (predictions of enzyme commission metagenome), ko_metagenome.qza (predictions of KEGG orthology), and pathway_abundance.qza (predictions of MetaCyc pathway abundance)85. Generated pathways and their corresponding values (copy numbers) for healthy and diseased tissues of each sample group across 2016 and 2017 (tip and base) were analyzed using Statistical Analysis of Metagenomic Profiles (STAMP) software25. Analysis was performed using: two-group analysis (healthy versus Fg-infected samples), two-sided, White’s non-parametric t-test (statistical hypothesis test), Bonferroni (multiple test correction method), DP: bootstrap (confidence interval method) along with a q-value filter > 0.05, effect size filter (ratio of proportions) < 1, and 95% confidence interval. Extended error bar plots were used to indicate significantly affected metabolic pathways. Overlaps across identified predicted metabolic pathways in both 2016 and 2017 for each silk tissue location (tip and base) were visualized using a Venn-diagram created using the VennDiagram R package. All calculated metabolic pathways were listed in Supplementary Table S7, including their detailed descriptions.

Statistical analysis

For the mean relative abundance calculations, they were estimated by calculating the relative abundance of a taxon at a specific taxonomic level in each sample, then by calculating the mean relative abundance of that taxon across samples within the same group (Figs. 1d, 4b, Supplementary Fig. S9). For estimating taxa at each taxonomic level (5 levels from the phylum to genus level) that significantly changed in abundance upon Fg infection, feature tables with taxonomy of each sample group were collapsed in Qiime2-2019.10 using the qiime taxa collapse function, then uploaded along with their corresponding metadata files in STAMP for statistical analyses using a two-group analysis (healthy versus Fg infected samples), two-sided, White’s non-parametric t-test (statistical hypothesis test), Benjamini-Hochberg (multiple test correction method), DP: bootstrap (confidence interval method) along with a q-value filter > 0.05, effect size filter (difference between proportions) < 1, and 95% confidence interval. Extended error bar plots (Supplementary Fig. S10) were used to display the taxa that significantly changed upon Fg infection. For alpha diversity analyses, estimation of richness (observed OTUs), diversity (Shannon), evenness (Pielou), and Faith’s Phylogenetic Diversity (FPD) metrics/indices were performed on OTU-tables, and Wilcoxon/Kruskal–Wallis tests were used at p value < 0.05. Estimates are available in Supplementary Table S4. For beta diversity analyses, data were normalized using a rarefying method (even sampling depth) for each tested group as illustrated in Supplementary Table S5 to estimate the variation in TSM composition across groups of samples. In the Qiime2-2019.10 platform, a permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) test was applied to Bray–Curtis, unweighted UniFrac and weighted UniFrac distance matrices with 999 permutations, and the results were confirmed by testing for homogeneity of dispersions through a PERMDISP test. For statistical significance testing, p values of < 0.05 were considered significant. To visualize how similar or dissimilar the samples (healthy vs Fg-infected) were, 2D Principal Coordinate (PCoA) plots were generated from the calculated matrices. Additional ordination plots were constructed in 5 parallel principal coordinates (vertical lines) to capture the differences between years/treatments where each colored line represents one sample.

Experimental research including collection of plant material

The authors declare that the collection of plant material used in this study complies with all relevant institutional, national and international guidelines and treaties. The seed germplasm are Canadian domesticated Zea mays (modern corn) which is not endangered, and the seed material was bred in Canada by one of the co-authors (Dr. Lana Reid from Agriculture and Agrifood Canada) within the same domestic jurisdiction and hence not in violation of any international treaties for the protection of plant germplasm.

Statement of permissions and/or licenses for collection of plant or seed specimens

The authors declare that the seed specimens used in this study were generated by one of the study co-authors (Dr. Lana Reid from Agriculture and Agrifood Canada). They are publicly accessible seed materials and we were given explicit written permission to use them for this research. They are part of Dr. Reid’s public corn breeding program. They were not collected from the wild, and instead bred in Canada at Agriculture and Agrifood Canada, a public government institution.

References

  1. 1.

    Chen, C. et al. The microbiota continuum along the female reproductive tract and its relation to uterine-related diseases. Nat. Commun. 8, 875 (2017).

    ADS  PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Thompson, M. E. H. & Raizada, M. N. Fungal pathogens of maize gaining free passage along the silk road. Pathogens 7, 81 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Anahtar, M. N., Gootenberg, D. B., Mitchell, C. M. & Kwon, D. S. Cervicovaginal microbiota and reproductive health: the virtue of simplicity. Cell Host Microbe 23, 159–168 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Liao, Y. et al. Deoxynivalenol, gut microbiota and immunotoxicity: a potential approach?. Food Chem. Toxicol. 112, 342–354 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Zhou, L. Z., Juranić, M. & Dresselhaus, T. Germline development and fertilization mechanisms in maize. Mol. Plant 10, 389–401 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Stockwell, V. O. et al. Epiphytic colonization of pear stigmas and hypanthia by bacteria during primary bloom. Phytopathology 89, 1162–1168 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Junker, R. R. & Keller, A. Microhabitat heterogeneity across leaves and flower organs promotes bacterial diversity. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 91, fiv97 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Rebolleda Gómez, M. & Ashman, T. L. Floral organs act as environmental filters and interact with pollinators to structure the yellow monkeyflower (Mimulus guttatus) floral microbiome. Mol. Ecol. 28, 5155–5171 (2019).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Cui, Z., Huntley, R. B., Zeng, Q. & Steven, B. Temporal and spatial dynamics in the apple flower microbiome in the presence of the phytopathogen Erwinia amylovora. ISME J. 15, 318–329 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Turc, O., Bouteillé, M., Fuad-Hassan, A., Welcker, C. & Tardieu, F. The growth of vegetative and reproductive structures (leaves and silks) respond similarly to hydraulic cues in maize. New Phytol. 212, 377–388 (2016).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Borrás, L. & Vitantonio-Mazzini, L. N. Maize reproductive development and kernel set under limited plant growth environments. J. Exp. Bot. 69, 3235–3243 (2018).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Debruin, J. L., Hemphill, B. & Schussler, J. R. Silk development and kernel set in maize as related to nitrogen stress. Crop Sci. 58, 2581–2592 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Rahman, N. A. & Wan Rosli, W. I. Nutritional compositions and antioxidative capacity of the silk obtained from immature and mature corn. J. King Saud Univ. Sci. 26, 119–127 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Johnson, E. T., Berhow, M. A. & Dowd, P. F. Expression of a maize Myb transcription factor driven by a putative silk-specific promoter significantly enhances resistance to Helicoverpa zea in transgenic maize. J. Agric. Food Chem. 55, 2998–3003 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Wilson, D. Candida albicans. Trends Microbiol. 27, 188–189 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Patriarca, A. & Fernández Pinto, V. Prevalence of mycotoxins in foods and decontamination. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 14, 50–60 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Magan, N. & Medina, A. Integrating gene expression, ecology and mycotoxin production by Fusarium and Aspergillus species in relation to interacting environmental factors. World Mycotoxin J. 9, 673–684 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Mousa, W. K., Shearer, C. R., Limay-Rios, V., Zhou, T. & Raizada, M. N. Bacterial endophytes from wild maize suppress Fusarium graminearum in modern maize and inhibit mycotoxin accumulation. Front. Plant Sci. 6, 805 (2015).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Mousa, W. K. et al. An endophytic fungus isolated from finger millet (Eleusine coracana) produces anti-fungal natural products. Front. Microbiol. 6, 1157 (2015).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Mousa, W. K. et al. Root-hair endophyte stacking in finger millet creates a physicochemical barrier to trap the fungal pathogen Fusarium graminearum. Nat. Microbiol. 1, 16167 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Mousa, W. K., Schwan, A. L. & Raizada, M. N. Characterization of antifungal natural products isolated from endophytic fungi of finger millet (Eleusine coracana). Molecules 21, 1171 (2016).

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Chen, Y. et al. Wheat microbiome bacteria can reduce virulence of a plant pathogenic fungus by altering histone acetylation. Nat. Commun. 9, 3429 (2018).

    ADS  PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Hug, L. A. et al. A new view of the tree of life. Nat. Microbiol. 1, 16048 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Langille, M. G. I. et al. Predictive functional profiling of microbial communities using 16S rRNA marker gene sequences. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 814–821 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Parks, D. H., Tyson, G. W., Hugenholtz, P. & Beiko, R. G. STAMP: statistical analysis of taxonomic and functional profiles. Bioinformatics 30, 3123–3124 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Taube, K. The Classic Maya maize god: a reappraisal. Fifth Palenque Round Table 7, 171–181 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Schmidt, T. M., Thomé, A. H. E., Sperotto, R. A. & Granada, C. E. Effect of rhizobia inoculation on the development of soil-borne pathogens infecting common bean plants. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 153, 687–694. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-018-1600-y (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Shi, C. et al. Biocontrol of Fusarium graminearum growth and deoxynivalenol production in wheat kernels with bacterial antagonists. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 11, 1094–1105 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Zhao, Y. et al. Antagonistic action of Bacillus subtilis strain SG6 on Fusarium graminearum. PLoS ONE 9, e92486 (2014).

    ADS  PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Hu, W., Gao, Q., Hamada, M. S. & Dawood, D. H. Potential of Pseudomonas chlororaphis subsp aurantiaca Strain Pcho10 as a biocontrol agent against Fusarium graminearum. Phytopathology 104, 1289–1297 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Lisboa, B. B. et al. Soil fungistasis against Fusarium graminearum under different crop management systems. Rev. Bras. Ciência do Solo 39, 69–77 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Díaz Herrera, S., Grossi, C., Zawoznik, M. & Groppa, M. D. Wheat seeds harbour bacterial endophytes with potential as plant growth promoters and biocontrol agents of Fusarium graminearum. Microbiol. Res. 186–187, 37–43 (2016).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Chung, J., Song, G. C. & Ryu, C.-M. Sweet scents from good bacteria: Case studies on bacterial volatile compounds for plant growth and immunity. Plant Mol. Biol. 90, 677–687 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Cho, S. M. et al. 2R,3R-butanediol, a bacterial volatile produced by Pseudomonas chlororaphis O6, is involved in induction of systemic tolerance to drought in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 21, 1067–1075 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Ruiu, L. Microbial biopesticides in agroecosystems. Agronomy 8, 235 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Rosenblueth, M. et al. Nitrogen fixation in cereals. Front. Microbiol. 9, 1794 (2018).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Naylor, D., Degraaf, S., Purdom, E. & Coleman-Derr, D. Drought and host selection influence bacterial community dynamics in the grass root microbiome. ISME J. 11, 2691–2704 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Cohen, A. C. et al. Azospirillum brasilense ameliorates the response of Arabidopsis thaliana to drought mainly via enhancement of ABA levels. Physiol. Plant. 153, 79–90 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Suárez, R. et al. Improvement of drought tolerance and grain yield in common bean by overexpressing trehalose-6-phosphate synthase in Rhizobia. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 21, 958–966 (2008).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Rho, H. et al. Do endophytes promote growth of host plants under stress? A meta-analysis on plant stress mitigation by endophytes. Microb. Ecol. 75, 407–418 (2018).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Santoyo, G., Moreno-Hagelsieb, G., del Carmen Orozco-Mosqueda, M. & Glick, B. R. Plant growth-promoting bacterial endophytes. Microbiol. Res. 183, 92–99 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Chagas, F. O., Pessotti, R. D. C., Caraballo-Rodríguez, A. M. & Pupo, M. T. Chemical signaling involved in plant-microbe interactions. Chem. Soc. Rev. 47, 1652–1704 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Dhakal, R., Bajpai, V. K. & Baek, K. H. Production of GABA (γ-aminobutyric acid) by microorganisms: a review. Brazilian J. Microbiol. 43, 1230–1241 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Ma, J. et al. Genomic and secretomic insight into lignocellulolytic system of an endophytic bacterium Pantoea ananatis Sd-1. Biotechnol. Biofuels 9, 25 (2016).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Georgelis, N., Nikolaidis, N. & Cosgrove, D. J. Bacterial expansins and related proteins from the world of microbes. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 99, 3807–3823 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Liew, W. & Mohd-redzwan, S. Mycotoxin: its impact on gut health and microbiota. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 8, 60 (2018).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Bacon, C. W., Hinton, D. M. & Mitchell, T. R. Is quorum signaling by mycotoxins a new risk-mitigating strategy for bacterial biocontrol of Fusarium verticillioides and other endophytic fungal species?. J. Agric. Food Chem. 65, 7071–7080 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Lynch, M. D. J. & Neufeld, J. D. Ecology and exploration of the rare biosphere. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 13, 217–229 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Pandolfi, V., Jorge, E. C., Melo, C. M. R., Albuquerque, A. C. S. & Carrer, H. Gene expression profile of the plant pathogen Fusarium graminearum under the antagonistic effect of Pantoea agglomerans. Genet. Mol. Res. 9, 1298–1311 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Gohel, V., Singh, A., Vimal, M. & Ashwini, P. Bioprospecting and antifungal potential of chitinolytic microorganisms. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 5, 54–72 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Walterson, A. M. & Stavrinides, J. Pantoea: Insights into a highly versatile and diverse genus within the Enterobacteriaceae. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 39, 968–984 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Han, J. et al. Characterization of a novel plant growth-promoting bacteria strain Delftia tsuruhatensis HR4 both as a diazotroph and a potential biocontrol agent against various plant pathogens. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 28, 66–76 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Siegel-Hertz, K. et al. Comparative microbiome analysis of a Fusarium wilt suppressive soil and a Fusarium wilt conducive soil from the Châteaurenard region. Front. Microbiol. 9, 568 (2018).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Adame-García, J., Luna-Rodríguez, M. & Iglesias-Andreu, L. G. Vanilla rhizobacteria as antagonists against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. vanillae. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 18, 23–30 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Verma, S. K. et al. Bacterial endophytes from rice cut grass (Leersia oryzoides L.) increase growth, promote root gravitropic response, stimulate root hair formation, and protect rice seedlings from disease. Plant Soil 422, 223–238 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Devi, A. R., Sharma, G. D., Majumdar, P. B. & Pandey, P. A multispecies consortium of bacteria having plant growth promotion and antifungal activities, for the management of Fusarium wilt complex disease in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 16, 614–624 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Adeniji, A. A. & Babalola, O. O. Tackling maize fusariosis: in search of Fusarium graminearum biosuppressors. Arch. Microbiol. 200, 1239–1255 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    He, W. J. et al. An aldo-keto reductase is responsible for Fusarium toxin degrading activity in a soil Sphingomonas strain. Sci. Rep. 7, 9549 (2017).

    ADS  PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Cobo-díaz, J. F., Baroncelli, R., Floch, G. L. & Picot, A. Combined metabarcoding and co-occurrence network analysis to profile the bacterial, fungal and Fusarium communities and their interactions in maize stalks. Front. Microbiol. 10, 261 (2019).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    De Boer, W., Wagenaar, A. M., Klein Gunnewiek, P. J. A. & Van Veen, J. A. In vitro suppression of fungi caused by combinations of apparently non-antagonistic soil bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 59, 177–185 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Khan, M. R. & Doohan, F. M. Bacterium-mediated control of Fusarium head blight disease of wheat and barley and associated mycotoxin contamination of grain. Biol. Control 48, 42–47 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Król, A. et al. Microbiology neutralization of zearalenone using Lactococcus lactis and Bifidobacterium sp. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 410, 943–952 (2018).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Jansson, J. K. & Hofmockel, K. S. The soil microbiome—from metagenomics to metaphenomics. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 43, 162–168 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Nasielski, J., Earl, H. & Deen, B. Luxury vegetative nitrogen uptake in maize buffers grain yield under post-silking water and nitrogen stress: a mechanistic understanding. Front. Plant Sci. 10, 318 (2019).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Chakraborty, S. & Newton, A. C. Climate change, plant diseases and food security: an overview. Plant Pathol. 60, 2–14 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Tola, M. & Kebede, B. Occurrence, importance and control of mycotoxins: a review. Cogent Food Agric. 2, 1191103 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Chilaka, C. A., De-Boevre, M., Atanda, O. O. & De-Saeger, S. The status of fusarium mycotoxins in sub-Saharan Africa: a review of emerging trends and post-harvest mitigation strategies towards food control. Toxins (Basel) 9, 19 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Reid, L. M., Mather, D. E., Hamilton, R. I. & Bolton, A. T. Diallel analysis of resistance in maize to Fasarium graminearum infection via the silk. Can. J. Plant Sci. 72, 915–923 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Saghai-Maroof, M. A., Soliman, K. M., Jorgensen, R. A. & Allard, R. W. Ribosomal DNA spacer-length polymorphisms in barley: mendelian inheritance, chromosomal location, and population dynamics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 81, 8014–8018 (1984).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Walters, W. et al. Improved bacterial 16S rRNA gene (V4 and V4–V5) and fungal internal transcribed spacer marker gene primers for microbial community surveys. mSystems 1, e0009-15 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Lundberg, D. S., Yourstone, S., Mieczkowski, P., Jones, C. D. & Dangl, J. L. Practical innovations for high-throughput amplicon sequencing. Nat. Methods 10, 999–1002 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Bolyen, E. et al. Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 852–857 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Callahan, B. J. et al. DADA2: High resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat. Methods 13, 581–583 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Katoh, K. & Standley, D. M. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30, 772–780 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Price, M. N., Dehal, P. S. & Arkin, A. P. FastTree 2-Approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments. PLoS ONE 5, e9490 (2010).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    McDonald, D. et al. The Biological Observation Matrix (BIOM) format or: how I learned to stop worrying and love the ome-ome. Gigascience 1, 2047-217X-1-7 (2012).

  77. 77.

    McMurdie, P. J. & Holmes, S. Phyloseq: an R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLoS ONE 8, e61217 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Foster, Z. S. L., Sharpton, T. J. & Grünwald, N. J. Metacoder: an R package for visualization and manipulation of community taxonomic diversity data. PLoS Comput. Biol. 13, e1005404 (2017).

    ADS  PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Oksanen, A. J. et al. vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.5-7. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/vegan/index.html (2020).

  80. 80.

    Wickham, H. Ggplot2. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Stat. 3, 180–185 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Chen, H. & Boutros, P. C. VennDiagram : a package for the generation of highly-customizable Venn and Euler diagrams in R. BMC Bioinform. 12, 35 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Love, M. I., Anders, S. & Huber, W. Differential analysis of count data - the DESeq2 package. Genome Biol. 15, 550 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Lahti, L., Shetty, S., Blake, T. & Salojarvi, J. Microbiome R package. Bioconductor 3, 12 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Schloerke, B. et al. GGally: extension to ggplot. R package version 0.5.0. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=GGally (2014).

  85. 85.

    Douglas, G. M. et al. PICRUSt2: an improved and extensible approach for metagenome inference. bioRxiv (2019). https://doi.org/10.1101/672295.

  86. 86.

    Kanehisa, M. & Goto, S. KEGG: kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 27–30. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/28.1.27 (2000).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Kanehisa, M. Toward understanding the origin and evolution of cellular organisms. Protein Sci. 28, 1947–1951. https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.3715 (2019).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Kanehisa, M., Furumichi, M., Sato, Y., Ishiguro-Watanabe, M. & Tanabe, M. KEGG: integrating viruses and cellular organisms. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, D545–D551. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkaa970 (2021).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This project was funded by generous grants provided to MNR from Ontario Genomics (SPARK Program), NSERC Discovery, NSERC Strategic, Ontario Ministry of Food, Agriculture & Rural Affairs, and Grain Farmers of Ontario (GFO). We thank Elaine Corbett (SPARK) for her enthusiasm and support of this project. We thank Todd Phibbs, Stacie Dobson, Katiani Eli and Darrell Galbraith (Ridgetown Campus, University of Guelph) for assistance with field trials.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

E.M.K. performed all data analysis, generated data displays, and wrote the manuscript. A.S. extracted all plant genomic DNA. J.R. helped to design the study, conducted the field trials and tissue sampling. M.D.J.L. provided bioinformatics technical support. C.R.S. assisted with field trials. V.L.M. coordinated the field trials. L.R. provided maize genotype technical expertise and provided the seed materials. M.N.R. conceptualized and coordinated the study and edited the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manish N. Raizada.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khalaf, E.M., Shrestha, A., Rinne, J. et al. Transmitting silks of maize have a complex and dynamic microbiome. Sci Rep 11, 13215 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-92648-4

Download citation

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links