Abstract
Microbial communities are commonly studied by using amplicon sequencing of part of the 16S rRNA gene. Sequencing of the full-length 16S rRNA gene can provide higher taxonomic resolution and accuracy. To obtain even higher taxonomic resolution, with as few false-positives as possible, we assessed a method using long amplicon sequencing targeting the rRNA operon combined with a CCMetagen pipeline. Taxonomic assignment had > 90% accuracy at the species level in a mock sample and at the family level in equine fecal samples, generating similar taxonomic composition as shotgun sequencing. The rRNA operon amplicon sequencing of equine fecal samples underestimated compositional percentages of bacterial strains containing unlinked rRNA genes by a fourth to a third, but unlinked rRNA genes had a limited effect on the overall results. The rRNA operon amplicon sequencing with the A519F + U2428R primer set was able to detect some kind of archaeal genomes such as Methanobacteriales and Methanomicrobiales, whereas full-length 16S rRNA with 27F + 1492R could not. Therefore, we conclude that amplicon sequencing targeting the rRNA operon captures more detailed variations of equine microbiota.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The horse is a hindgut fermenter, and most microbial activities in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract take place in the large intestine, so the majority of intestinal microbes reside in the colon and the comparatively enlarged caecum1. The degradation of indigestible cellulosic and hemi-cellulosic forage components by these microbes is crucial for the bioavailability of energy and essential nutrients in horses2. Studies of these activities in the GI tract of horses have focused on bacteria, but fungi and archaea are also involved3,4. In particular, methanogenic archaea, widely found in the equine hindgut, metabolize H2 and CO2 to methane, and are considered to support the carbohydrate-degrading activity of cellulolytic bacteria in the hindgut4,5,6. The GI microbiota also plays a crucial role in maintaining normal microbial flora by various methods: it produces antimicrobial products, competes directly for nutrients with pathogens, inhibits or inactivates bacterial toxins, and produces bacteriocins and short-chain fatty acids, which inhibit the growth of pathogens and pathobionts7. It has also been shown to modify virulence factor expression of pathogens and to facilitate the host barrier function through the upregulation of mucus production, antimicrobial molecules, and secretion of IgA7.
High-throughput sequencing technologies are widely used to investigate microbial flora in many environments, such as oral, intestinal, vaginal, aquatic, and soil. Amplicon sequencing targeting a specific region in microbial genomes is one methodology that uses high-throughput sequencing, and a partial region of the 16S rRNA gene is commonly used to study microbiomes8. The third generation of sequencing technologies now allows the production of very long reads, albeit with higher error rates, in real time9,10. Yet despite the higher error rates, analysis of the full-length 16S rRNA gene amplicon by nanopore sequencing technology has a comparable or higher taxonomic resolution of bacterial flora at the genus and particularly species levels than short-read sequencing on an Illumina platform11,12,13. Long amplicon analysis targeting the nearly complete 16S-ITS-23S rRNA operon has been used to achieve greater confidence in taxonomic assignment14,15,16, but it could miss some proportion of bacterial species on account of unlinked rRNA genes. Unlinked rRNA genes are widespread among bacteria and archaea: at rates of 13–41% in soil, 7.7–29% in sediment, and 8.1–8.8% in anaerobic digesters, though not in the human gut17. In addition, the incompleteness of databases for the 16S-ITS-23S rRNA operon could be a limitation in using the operon region in metagenome sequencing; i.e., some false-positives could be assigned owing to an insufficient record of bacterial and archaeal species or the short sequence lengths of the deposited microbes14,16.
Our main aim in this study was to reveal the features and limitations of rRNA operon amplicon sequencing in metagenomic analysis of equine fecal samples in comparison with full-length 16S rRNA gene sequencing and shotgun sequencing. First, we evaluated the two nanopore-based long amplicon sequencing methods with different PCR polymerase kits and reference databases for taxonomic assignments, using a mock bacterial community. Short-read sequence data from the Illumina MiSeq system was also evaluated in comparison to the long amplicon sequencings. Second, we explored unlinked rRNA genes in equine feces and assessed their influence on overall taxonomic compositional results generated by the rRNA operon amplicon sequencing. Finally, we compared the results to reveal the advantages and disadvantages of each sequencing method.
Materials and methods
Genomic DNA of mock bacterial community
A bacterial DNA cocktail of a mock community (DNA-Mock-001, Lot Number BK1903D01) was obtained from the National Institute of Technology and Evaluation’s Biological Resource Center (NBRC, Tokyo, Japan). It comprises genomic DNA prepared from 15 bacterial strains (Table S1).
Fecal sampling and DNA extraction
Fecal samples were collected from three female Thoroughbred horses (Equus ferus caballus): A and S (2 years old) and L (9 years old). All horses were clinically healthy, with no apparent history of intestinal problems. No antimicrobials had been administered to them for at least a month before sampling. The samples from horses A and S were immediately sampled just after being dropped on the straw bed in the stable. The sample from horse L was collected directly from the rectum. The samples were immediately placed on ice and the genomic DNA of each was extracted within 1 h after collection. For DNA extraction, 3 g of wet fecal sample was suspended vigorously in 40 mL of PBS and then left for 1 min at room temperature to remove large plant debris. Then 4 mL of the suspension was centrifuged at 13,000×g for 2 min at 4 °C, and the pellet was washed twice with TE buffer containing 10 mM Tris and 1 mM EDTA. The final pellet was suspended in 800 µL of distilled water. The genomic DNA was extracted from the suspension by using a Quick-DNA Fecal/Soil Microbe Kit (Zymo Research, Tokyo, Japan) following the manufacturer’s instructions. It was purified with an Agencourt AMPure XP purifier (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA), and short DNA (< 10 kb) was depleted by using a short-read eliminator (XS; Circulomics, Baltimore, MD, USA).
All samplings and experiments were conducted in accordance with ethical and welfare regulations of the Animal care committee of the Equine Research Institute. The Animal care committee of the Equine Research Institute approved all experimental protocols. We also complied with the ARRIVE guidelines (https://arriveguidelines.org/).
Sequencing and base-calling for mock community
For nanopore sequencing, genomic libraries for two target regions (full-length 16S rRNA gene and 16S-ITS-23S rRNA operon) were prepared by using the four-primer PCR method protocol, version FFP_9038_v108_revN_14Aug2019 (Oxford Nanopore Technologies [ONT], Oxford, UK) with slight modifications. The four-primer PCR uses two target-specific inner primers with a 5′ tail and two universal outer primers which prime off the tail on the 5′ end of the inner primers (Table S2), resulting in the generation of target amplicons with barcodes15,18,19. PCR amplifications were conducted using either LongAmp™ Taq 2 × Master Mix (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA) or the KAPA2G™ Robust HotStart Ready Mix PCR Kit (Kapa Biosystems, Wilmington, MA, USA). PCR was performed in a total volume of 25 µL containing the inner primers (50 nM each), the barcoded outer primer mixture (300 nM) from the PCR barcoding kit (SQK-PBK004; ONT), and the DNA cocktail (1 ng) as template. PCR conditions are shown in Table S3. The PCR amplicons were purified with the Agencourt AMPure XP purifier and quantified by a NanoDrop spectrophotometer (ThermoFisher Scientific), and the libraries were sequenced on a MinION sequencer using R9.4.1 flow cells (FLO-MIN106D; ONT) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Base-calling of raw fast5 data from the MinION was carried out in Guppy v. 3.6.1 software (ONT) with its “–trim_barcodes” option for removing sequencing adapters and barcodes. Details on each sample, including number of reads, median read lengths, and median read quality, are shown in Table S4.
The same genomic DNA was also sequenced on the Illumina MiSeq system targeting hypervariable region (V3-V4) by a commercial service (Oral Microbiome Center, Kagawa, Japan). This sequencing was conducted with a primer set of 341F and 806R following an Illumina protocol (16S Metagenomics Sequencing Library Preparation).
Sequencing and base-calling for fecal samples
For fecal samples, both long amplicon sequencing and shotgun sequencing were conducted. Genomic libraries for amplicon sequencing targeting the full-length 16S rRNA gene or the 16S-ITS-23S rRNA operon were prepared as for the mock community by using a KAPA2G Robust HotStart Ready Mix PCR Kit. Genomic libraries for shotgun sequencing were prepared by using a Rapid Barcoding Kit (SQK-RBK004; ONT) following the manufacturer’s instructions. All libraries were sequenced on the MinION sequencer using R9.4.1 flow cells. Base-calling of raw fast5 data was carried out as above; details are shown in Table S4.
Sequencing data processing for mock community
The raw FASTQ files from nanopore sequencings were pretrimmed in Seqkit v. 0.12.0 software20 to filter by quality scores of 10, with lengths of 1300 bp for the full-length 16S rRNA gene and 3500 bp for the 16S-ITS-23S rRNA operon. Afterward, 30,000 reads were subsampled in Seqtk v. 1.3. software (https://github.com/lh3/seqtk), and chimera reads were removed in yacrd v. 0.6.1 software21. Twenty thousand quality-controlled reads were selected by quality score > 12 and by size: 1300–1950 bp for the full-length 16S rRNA gene and 3500–5000 bp for the 16S-ITS-23S rRNA operon. Accurate taxonomic assignments of the quality-controlled read sets were performed with the CCMetagen pipeline by coupling with KMA v. 1.3.0 and CCMetagen v. 1.2.2 software22,23, i.e., read mapping to a reference database in KMA software (-mem_mode, -bcNano, and -1t1 options), specifying the minimum phred score (-mp 20), minimum alignment score (-mrs 0.0), and base-calling option (-bc 0.7), followed by a quality-filtering step in CCMetagen software with default settings. Two reference databases—rrn DB24 and ncbi_202006 DB, described below—were used in the taxonomic assignment step. The dissimilarity indices between the percentage of each sequencing condition and that of the expected abundance of the mock community were calculated by the vegan package in R v. 3.6.1 software with default settings25,26.
For analysis of short-read sequencing data, paired-end reads were merged in bbmerge software embedded in bbmerge v. 38.18 with default settings27. The merged reads were filtered in trimmomatic v. 0.39 software28, specifying the following parameters: headcrop of 15 bp, tailcrop of 5 bp, window length of 4 bp, window quality of 20, and minimum length of 350 bp. Chimera reads were removed in Vsearch v. 2.17.0 software with default settings29 and 20,000 reads were subsampled in the Seqtk software. Taxonomic assignments of the quality-controlled read set were performed with the CCMetagen pipeline by using the ncbi_202006 DB, specifying -1t1 option in the KMA software.
Sequencing data processing for fecal samples
For the FASTQ files from the long amplicon sequencing, pretrimmed reads were created in Seqkit software to filter by quality scores of 10, with lengths of 1300 bp for the full-length 16S rRNA gene and 3500 bp for the 16S-ITS-23S rRNA operon. Chimera reads were removed in yacrd software. Quality-controlled reads were selected by quality score > 11 and by size: 1300–1950 bp for the full-length 16S rRNA gene and 3500–5000 bp for the 16S-ITS-23S rRNA operon. Taxonomic assignments were performed as above.
For the FASTQ files from the shotgun sequencing, quality-controlled data sets were created in Seqkit software to filter by lengths of 1000 bp and quality scores of 10. After conversion from FASTQ format to FASTA format, rRNA genes were detected in each sequence read in Barrnap v. 0.9 software (https://github.com/tseemann/barrnap) with default settings, and the reads which contained rRNA genes were extracted from the raw FASTA files in Seqkit software: 2333 sequence reads from horse A, 4417 reads from horse S, and 8700 reads from horse L. The taxon assignments of each read against ncbi_202006 DB were performed as above. For further investigations of unlinked rRNA genes, the reads that could be classified to at least phylum level were kept, and we classified reads as containing unlinked rRNA genes following the previous criteria17, namely if there was > 1500 bp between the 16S and 23S rRNA genes, or if there was no 23S domain found by 1500 bp after the end of the 16S rRNA. We removed the sequence reads for final analyses that could not be judged to contain linked or unlinked rRNA genes (i.e., with < 1500 bp after the 3′ end of the 16S rRNA gene), and we kept only reads that included a 16S rRNA gene to avoid potential double-counting organisms with unlinked 16S and 23S rRNA genes. Information on all long-read sequences included is shown in Table S5.
The ggplot2 package in R v. 3.6.1 software was used to depict the percentages of quality-filtered reads from the CCMetagen pipeline in each taxon and boxplots for the top 20 orders with the highest average percentage30. The NMDS analysis was carried out using the vegan package in R software with default settings25. A heat map showing the percentage of each order identified was plotted in ComplexHeatmap software in R, specifying the distance measure “spearman” and clustering method “ward.D2” for hierarchical clustering31.
Taxonomic reference databases
We used two databases which contain sequences of the 16S-ITS-23S rRNA operon: (1) rrn DB, which includes sequences from the whole ribosomal operon of 22,351 bacterial species retrieved from GenBank24, and (2) ncbi_202006 DB, which was created in this study. To create ncbi_202006 DB, all of the bacterial and archaeal data were downloaded from reference sequence database at NCBI in June 2020 in genome_updater v. 0.2.2 software (https://github.com/pirovc/genome_updater), and rRNA genes were predicted and extracted in Barrnap software. Each rRNA gene in the same nucleotide sequence was concatenated if the distance between rRNA genes was < 2000 bp, because the lengths of ITS regions in linked rRNA genes were by definition < 1500 bp17. All sequences whose lengths were < 1000 bp were removed from the database. The final ncbi_20206 DB consists of 493,329 sequences, including > 2700 genera and > 11,500 species of bacteria or archaea. To account for the diversity of rRNA operon sequences in the same bacterial species, multiple operon sequences of the same bacterial species are included in the ncbi_202006 DB. Accessions for ncbi_20206 DB are available at https://bitbucket.org/ykinoshita1984/ncbi_db/downloads/.
To check the impact of an inadequate database on the mapping results, we created an incomplete database by removing two bacterial species (Bacillus subtilis and Lactobacillus delbrueckii) from the ncbi_202006 DB.
Statistical analysis
The vegan package in R software was used to conduct permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA), specifying the Bray–Curtis method and 10,000 permutations25. P < 0.05 was considered to indicate a significant difference.
Results and discussion
Mock community
Comparisons of metagenomic sequence data acquired with several combinations of conditions from defined mock communities are important for the assessment of sequencing platform performance and downstream analyses, including taxonomic assignment. Using a commercial mock community containing DNAs of 15 bacteria, we compared long-read metagenomic sequences from three sources: (1) PCR polymerase kits—LongAmp™ Taq 2 × Master Mix and KAPA2G™ Robust HotStart Ready Mix PCR Kit; (2) PCR target regions—full-length 16S rRNA gene (~ 1450 bp) and 16S-ITS-23S rRNA operon (~ 4000 bp); and (3) reference databases—the rrn operon database, rrn DB24, and the ncbi_202006 DB, newly designed in this study. The accuracy of short-read metagenomic sequence data targeting the V3-V4 region was also compared with those of the long-read sequence data. The degree of assignment of 20,000 quality-controlled reads at the genus or species level is shown in Fig. 1. Among the nine sequencing conditions at genus level, the lowest values of both dissimilarity index with the expected abundance of the mock community (0.22) and the percentage of “mis- or unidentified” (1.3%) were observed in a long-read combination of KAPA2G™, rRNA operon, and ncbi_202006 DB. At the species level, the same combination obtained the lowest values (0.23 of dissimilarity index and 6.2% of “mis- or unidentified”). The Illumina MiSeq platform targeting the V3-V4 region obtained 0.40 of dissimilarity index and 9.4% of “mis- or unidentified” at genus level and these values were higher than any long-read combination values obtained in this study. The values of the short-read method at species level (0.52 of dissimilarity index and 23.9% of “mis- or unidentified”) were inferior to the best long-read method (KAPA2G™, rRNA operon, and ncbi_202006 DB). In addition, numbers of taxon misidentified, i.e., assigned to genus or species other than the 15 bacteria in the mock bacterial community, from Illumina MiSeq (8 genera and 17 species, respectively) were higher than the average numbers of full-length 16S rRNA gene (4.8 and 14.8) and rRNA operon (3.5 and 5.3) (Fig. S1). Although short-read sequencing method is the most commonly used in the field of metagenomic data analysis in recent years8, we observed the rRNA operon amplicon sequencing was superior to the short-read sequencing in terms of dissimilarity index with the expected abundance of the mock community, percentage of “mis- or unidentified”, and numbers of taxon misidentified. Therefore, we focused on long-read sequencings in this study.
The beta diversities among the eight long-read sequencings were explained mainly by PCR target region (genus level, R2 = 0.51946, P = 0.0042; species level, R2 = 0.55341, P = 0.0036, PERMANOVA, Table 1). The PCR polymerase kits and reference databases had less effect on the taxonomic assignment than the PCR target regions, but still affected both the dissimilarity from the expected abundance of the mock community and the percentage “mis- or unidentified”. In total, the combination of KAPA2G, rRNA operon, and ncbi_202006 DB performed best at assigning the genus and particularly the species in terms of both dissimilarity and percentage “mis- or unidentified”. Therefore, we compared shotgun sequencing method and two amplicon sequencing methods in the following experiments: KAPA2G + rRNA operon + ncbi_202006 DB and KAPA2G + full-length 16S rRNA gene + ncbi_202006 DB.
Effect of inadequate database
To examine the influence of an inadequate database, we compared the mapping results by using ncbi_202006 DB and the incomplete database which did not contain Bacillus subtilis and Lactobacillus delbrueckii. The deleted species were not detected at all when used the incomplete database. There was a significant increase in the percentage of mis- or unidentified in both amplicon sequencings, while no significant change was observed in the percentage of bacteria other than the two deleted species (Fig. S2). This result shows the importance of using an enriched database that includes a wide range of bacterial species.
Unlinked rRNA genes
Unlinked rRNA genes are widespread in natural environments such as soil but have not been detected in the human gut17. The presence or absence of unlinked rRNA genes in the gut of other animals has been unclear. Here, we found sequence reads of unlinked rRNA genes in all three equine fecal samples (Tables 2, S5). In particular, the feces from horse L were collected directly from the rectum, with no opportunity for contamination with unlinked rRNA genes from environments such as straw beds and soils. Therefore, we believe that the unlinked rRNA genes are naturally present in horse feces. All reads with unlinked rRNA genes found from the horses were mapped in KMA software22 to genus Cellulosilyticum or Anaerocolumna and were quality filtered by CCMetagen software23 to family Lachnospiraceae, order Clostridiales, or phylum Firmicutes, depending on their mapping qualities. Members of the Lachnospiraceae can ferment diverse plant polysaccharides to produce short-chain fatty acids32, and make up the largest single group in rumen microbes of cows33. No unlinked rRNA gene in three complete genomes of genus Anaerocolumna was found (Tables S6, S6_1–3). The complete genome of Anaerocolumna aminovalerica, which was mapped by a sequence read in this study, was not registered in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database as at the end of 2020, and the presence of unlinked rRNA genes in Anaerocolumna remains to be studied. On the other hand, we found that the genome of Cellulosilyticum lentocellum DSM 5427 has multiple rRNA copies with a combination of linked- and unlinked rRNA genes, being defined as “mixed type”17,34 (Tables S6, S6_4). We confirmed that Cellulosilyticum sp. WCF-2 (accession no. NZ_CP034675), which was isolated from cow feces, also has unlinked rRNA genes (Table S6_5). Therefore, we believe that the equine gut microbiota, unlike that in the human gut, contains unlinked rRNA genes, and that other herbivores—at least cows—also might have unlinked rRNA genes in the gut microbiota. The average length of the ITS regions in unlinked rRNA genes was almost 410,000 bp17, and could not be PCR-amplified before sequencing because of its long length. So rRNA operon amplicon sequencing might underestimate the occurrence of these strains with unlinked rRNA genes. We evaluated the degree of underestimation next.
CCMetagen pipeline and Healthy fecal samples
Clustering of operational taxonomic units (OTUs) and amplicon sequence variant analysis are commonly conducted for 16S amplicon sequencing on the Illumina platform. These steps can reduce duplications and errors of representative sequences, resulting in a more reliable taxonomic assignment35,36. But there are no solid consensus methods for OTU clustering or amplicon sequence variant analysis to obtain accurate taxonomic assignment in nanopore sequencing, and the latter’s higher error rate could overestimate the bacterial diversity in samples16,37. To avoid overestimation, several methods have been used with nanopore data: e.g., reconstructing the consensus sequence16 or removing singleton reads or OTUs, or removing reads or OTUs whose percentages are less than arbitrary values such as 0.005%12,38. In addition, the taxonomic identification of metagenomic reads is generally more reliable at higher taxonomic levels (e.g., phylum or class) than at lower levels (e.g., genus or species), but it is not easy to decide which taxonomic level is reliable enough, because it varies by metagenomic read. Here, we used a CCMetagen pipeline to obtain accurate taxonomic assignments at appropriate taxonomic levels by conducting quality-filtering steps in CCMetagen software after the read mappings in KMA software. This pipeline reportedly outperforms current analytic methods (i.e., Kraken2, Centrifuge, and KrakenUniq) in making accurate taxonomic classifications23. Although comparisons with other assignment methods to apply to nanopore reads remain to be made, the CCMetagen pipeline revealed that the average percentages of taxonomic identification at phylum, class, and order levels in fecal samples were > 90% by all three sequencing sources (Fig. 2). In addition, the average percentages at the family level by the two amplicons were also high enough to use for downstream analysis: 96.1% by 16S rRNA sequencing and 98.8% by rRNA operon sequencing. The percentages of taxa identified dropped sharply at genus level to 24.1% by 16S rRNA sequencing and 46.9% by rRNA operon sequencing, while those for the mock community were still comparatively high at genus level (93.3% and 98.7%, respectively) (Figs. 1, 2). These results might be attributed to the compositional complexities of the fecal samples. In addition, as the results in the mock community using the incomplete database, the deficits of registered genome information in the public databases of relevance to the equine gut microbiota might also have affected these results. The results at the order level, which are the lowest among the taxa with a taxonomic identification rate of ≥ 90% in all sequencing methods, were used for downstream analysis. Depiction of the numbers of orders detected against the numbers of reads analyzed showed that the curve started to plateau at around 30,000 reads (Fig. 3). So we randomly subsampled 30,000 reads from each combination of analytical conditions and used them in further experiments to analyze the composition of the equine gut microbiota.
We first compared the three sequencing methods in terms of the unlinked rRNA genes. The percentages of genus Cellulosilyticum and Anaerocolumna are shown in Table S7. The percentages of Cellulosilyticum which was found to possess unlinked rRNA genes ranged from 0.53 to 1.54% in horse A, 0.31 to 1.00% in horse S, and 0.14 to 0.73% in horse L. The total percentages including genus Anaerocolumna, although further study is needed to confirm the presence of the unlinked rRNA genes in Anaerocolumna, ranged from 0.88 to 2.81% in horse A, 0.53 to 2.03% in horse S, and 0.26 to 1.22% in horse L, showing that the values differed slightly depending on the sequencing method. The average values of the three horses with or without Anaerocolumna by rRNA operon amplicon sequencing (0.33% and 0.55%, respectively) were roughly a fourth to a third of the percentages by the other two methods (0.99% and 2.02% by 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing, 1.02% and 1.42% by shotgun sequencing). These results showed that bacterial strains with unlinked rRNA genes could account for approximately 1–2% of the equine fecal microbiota and amplicon sequencing targeting the rRNA operon underestimated the percentages of bacterial species with unlinked rRNA genes.
To evaluate the influence of the underestimation of unlinked rRNA genes on the overall metagenomic results, we performed non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) analysis. The taxonomic groups of the metagenomes generated from the same sequencing method were significantly similar (PERMANOVA: P = 0.0037, R2 = 0.74328), but the individual horse did not have a significant effect (PERMANOVA: P = 0.6553, R2 = 0.07468). The analysis showed clear differences among the three sequencing methods (Fig. 4). Despite the influence of the unlinked rRNA genes, the plots of the rRNA operon were distributed between those of the other methods, not generating an obvious independent group as compared to the other sequencings. In addition, clustering analysis shown by heat map grouped the compositions of the rRNA operon with those from the shotgun sequencing, showing that rRNA operon amplicon sequencing did not make an independent group by itself (Fig. 5). Overall, we found that amplicon sequencing targeting the rRNA operon could underestimate the percentage of bacterial strains containing unlinked rRNA genes by a fourth to a third when applied to equine fecal samples, but the effects on the overall metagenomic results were limited, and the operon targeted sequencing could generate similar metagenomic results to those by shotgun sequencing, which has no PCR bias.
We further explored differences between the three sequencing methods. Orders Clostridiales and Lactobacillales were dominant in all fecal samples by all methods (Figs. 5, 6). The averages of Orders Clostridiales and Lactobacillales were 67.7% and 15.8% in 16S rRNA gene sequencing, 48.9% and 30.7% in rRNA operon sequencing, and 40.3% and 40.2% in shotgun sequencing, respectively. These results are compatible with previous reports that the Firmicutes, which encompass the Clostridiales and the Lactobacillales, was the most dominant taxon in fecal samples from healthy Thoroughbreds39,40. Other taxa were much less predominant, but several taxa from each sequencing method had considerably lower abundances than those from the other sequencing methods: e.g., Desulfovibrionales and Corynebacteriales in 16S rRNA sequencing, Spirochaetales and Campylobacterales in rRNA operon sequencing, and Acidaminococcales in shotgun sequencing (Fig. 6). Several factors are known to affect taxonomic assignment, including primer sets, PCR conditions, and reference databases18,41,42,43. We used the same database, ncbi_202006 DB, in all the three sequencing methods, and attribute the differences described above mainly to primer mismatch or to PCR conditions such as annealing temperature. The most notable and interesting differences among the three sequencing methods were found in the archaea, in the orders Methanobacteriales and Methanomicrobiales. While 16S rRNA gene sequencing with the 27F + 1492R primer set could not find any archaeal genomes, both rRNA operon sequencing and shotgun sequencing could detect archaea, at mean values of 3.5% (1.9% of Methanobacteriales and 1.6% of Methanomicrobiales) and 3.3% (3.0% and 0.3%), respectively (Fig. 6). These archaea produce methane from H2 and CO2 and might boost the carbohydrate-degrading activity of cellulolytic bacteria4,6; therefore, methanogenic archaea should be more intensively focused on to unveil the mechanisms and functional interactions among microbes needed for successful degradation of nutrients. The diversity and importance of the archaea in various environments remain poorly understood44; one reason is that few primer sets have been validated45. The primer set used for the rRNA operon amplicon sequencing in this study—A519F + U2428R—covers a large proportion of the known bacterial and archaeal rRNA genes15, and the ratio of archaea is comparable to the results obtained by shotgun sequencing. Although the rRNA operon amplicon sequencing with the primer set of A519F + U2428R could detect some kind of archaeal genomes such as Methanobacteriales and Methanomicrobiales, the lack of archaeal genomes in the mock community could be a major limitation in this study, and further validation is needed for archaea.
To validate the reproducibility of the rRNA operon amplicon sequencing and analysis pipeline after DNA extraction, two additional sequencings per horse sample were conducted. The results showed that the characteristic differences among the fecal samples, such as Fibrobacterales, Methanomicrobiales, Enterobacterates, were reproduced, albeit with some variation among the three examinations. (Fig. S3). Furthermore, we were able to confirm the reproducibility by NMDS analysis (Fig. S4) and found that there was sufficient reproducibility in the steps after DNA extraction.
Conclusions
We compared long amplicon sequencing targeting the rRNA operon with the A519F + U2428R primer set with short-read sequencing method targeting V3-V4 region and other long-read sequencing methods, i.e., amplicon sequencing targeting the full-length 16S rRNA gene with the 27F + 1492R set and shotgun sequencing. Even though full-length 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing has low taxonomic resolution at the genus and especially species levels and cannot evaluate archaeal genomes, the 16S rRNA gene is still a promising target for metagenomic analysis using long amplicons because of its robustness among bacterial communities and the availability of comprehensive databases. rRNA operon amplicon sequencing combined with the KAPA2G™ Robust HotStart Ready Mix PCR Kit and the ncbi_202006 DB, a newly designed reference database, performed best at assigning the genus and particularly the species by using a bacterial mock community. Besides, the rRNA operon amplicon sequencing had fewer numbers of taxon misidentified compared to the short-read and full-length 16S rRNA gene sequencings. The rRNA operon amplicon sequencing detected some kind of archaeal genomes such as Methanobacteriales and Methanomicrobiales in equine feces, which might be an advantage of the A519F + U2428R primer set. In addition, the rRNA operon amplicon sequencing could offer confident bacterial taxonomic assignments even at lower ranks, so researchers can capture fecal microbiota in more detail in horses.
Data availability
All nanopore sequencing data generated in this study are available under the BioProject accession number PRJDB10841, with BioSamples accession numbers SAMD00260421 (mock community), SAMD00260422 (horse A), SAMD00260423 (horse S), and SAMD00260424 (horse L).
References
Blackmore, T. M. et al. Strong stability and host specific bacterial community in faeces of ponies. PLoS ONE 8, e75079. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0075079 (2013).
Julliand, V. & Grimm, P. HORSE SPECIES SYMPOSIUM: The microbiome of the horse hindgut: History and current knowledge. J. Anim. Sci. 94, 2262–2274. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2015-0198 (2016).
Moore, B. E. & Dehority, B. A. Effects of diet and hindgut defaunation on diet digestibility and microbial concentrations in the cecum and colon of the horse. J. Anim. Sci. 71, 3350–3358. https://doi.org/10.2527/1993.71123350x (1993).
Jensen, B. B. Methanogenesis in monogastric animals. Environ. Monit. Assess. 42, 99–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00394044 (1996).
Dougal, K. et al. A comparison of the microbiome and the metabolome of different regions of the equine hindgut. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 82, 642–652. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2012.01441.x (2012).
Flint, H. J., Scott, K. P., Duncan, S. H., Louis, P. & Forano, E. Microbial degradation of complex carbohydrates in the gut. Gut Microbes 3, 289–306. https://doi.org/10.4161/gmic.19897 (2012).
Kamada, N., Chen, G. Y., Inohara, N. & Nunez, G. Control of pathogens and pathobionts by the gut microbiota. Nat. Immunol. 14, 685–690. https://doi.org/10.1038/ni.2608 (2013).
Ranjan, R., Rani, A., Metwally, A., McGee, H. S. & Perkins, D. L. Analysis of the microbiome: Advantages of whole genome shotgun versus 16S amplicon sequencing. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 469, 967–977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.12.083 (2016).
Jain, M., Olsen, H. E., Paten, B. & Akeson, M. The Oxford Nanopore MinION: Delivery of nanopore sequencing to the genomics community. Genome Biol. 17, 239. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-016-1103-0 (2016).
Eid, J. et al. Real-time DNA sequencing from single polymerase molecules. Science 323, 133–138. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1162986 (2009).
Shin, J. et al. Analysis of the mouse gut microbiome using full-length 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing. Sci. Rep. 6, 29681. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep29681 (2016).
Nygaard, A. B., Tunsjo, H. S., Meisal, R. & Charnock, C. A preliminary study on the potential of Nanopore MinION and Illumina MiSeq 16S rRNA gene sequencing to characterize building-dust microbiomes. Sci. Rep. 10, 3209. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-59771-0 (2020).
Heikema, A. P. et al. Comparison of Illumina versus nanopore 16S rRNA gene sequencing of the human nasal microbiota. Genes https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11091105 (2020).
Cusco, A., Catozzi, C., Vines, J., Sanchez, A. & Francino, O. Microbiota profiling with long amplicons using Nanopore sequencing: Full-length 16S rRNA gene and the 16S-ITS-23S of the rrn operon. F1000Res 7, 1755. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.16817.2 (2018).
Martijn, J. et al. Confident phylogenetic identification of uncultured prokaryotes through long read amplicon sequencing of the 16S-ITS-23S rRNA operon. Environ. Microbiol. 21, 2485–2498. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.14636 (2019).
Kerkhof, L. J., Dillon, K. P., Haggblom, M. M. & McGuinness, L. R. Profiling bacterial communities by MinION sequencing of ribosomal operons. Microbiome 5, 116. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-017-0336-9 (2017).
Brewer, T. E. et al. Unlinked rRNA genes are widespread among bacteria and archaea. ISME J. 14, 597–608. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-019-0552-3 (2020).
Klindworth, A. et al. Evaluation of general 16S ribosomal RNA gene PCR primers for classical and next-generation sequencing-based diversity studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, e1. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks808 (2013).
Zeng, Y. H. et al. Long PCR-RFLP of 16S-ITS-23S rRNA genes: A high-resolution molecular tool for bacterial genotyping. J. Appl. Microbiol. 114, 433–447. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.12057 (2013).
Shen, W., Le, S., Li, Y. & Hu, F. SeqKit: A cross-platform and ultrafast toolkit for FASTA/Q file manipulation. PLoS ONE 11, e0163962. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163962 (2016).
Marijon, P., Chikhi, R. & Varre, J. S. yacrd and fpa: Upstream tools for long-read genome assembly. Bioinformatics 36, 3894–3896. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa262 (2020).
Clausen, P., Aarestrup, F. M. & Lund, O. Rapid and precise alignment of raw reads against redundant databases with KMA. BMC Bioinform. 19, 307. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-018-2336-6 (2018).
Marcelino, V. R. et al. CCMetagen: Comprehensive and accurate identification of eukaryotes and prokaryotes in metagenomic data. Genome Biol. 21, 103. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-020-02014-2 (2020).
Benitez-Paez, A. & Sanz, Y. Multi-locus and long amplicon sequencing approach to study microbial diversity at species level using the MinION portable nanopore sequencer. Gigascience 6, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/gix043 (2017).
Oksanen, J. et al. vegan: Community Ecology Package, https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan (2019).
Ihaka, R. & Gentleman, R. R: A language for data analysis and graphics. J. Comput. Graph Stat. 5, 299–314 (1996).
Bushnell, B., Rood, J. & Singer, E. BBMerge: Accurate paired shotgun read merging via overlap. PLoS ONE 12, e0185056. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185056 (2017).
Bolger, A. M., Lohse, M. & Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: A flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30, 2114–2120. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170 (2014).
Rognes, T., Flouri, T., Nichols, B., Quince, C. & Mahe, F. VSEARCH: A versatile open source tool for metagenomics. PeerJ 4, e2584. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2584 (2016).
Wickham, H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis, https://ggplot2.tidyverse.org (2016).
Gu, Z., Eils, R. & Schlesner, M. Complex heatmaps reveal patterns and correlations in multidimensional genomic data. Bioinformatics 32, 2847–2849. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btw313 (2016).
Te Pas, M. F. W. et al. Sanitary conditions affect the colonic microbiome and the colonic and systemic metabolome of female pigs. Front. Vet. Sci. 7, 585730. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.585730 (2020).
Seshadri, R. et al. Cultivation and sequencing of rumen microbiome members from the Hungate1000 Collection. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 359–367. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.4110 (2018).
Miller, D. A. et al. Complete genome sequence of the cellulose-degrading bacterium Cellulosilyticum lentocellum. J. Bacteriol. 193, 2357–2358. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00239-11 (2011).
Callahan, B. J. et al. DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat. Methods 13, 581–583. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3869 (2016).
Rosen, M. J., Callahan, B. J., Fisher, D. S. & Holmes, S. P. Denoising PCR-amplified metagenome data. BMC Bioinform. 13, 283. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-13-283 (2012).
Santos, A., van Aerle, R., Barrientos, L. & Martinez-Urtaza, J. Computational methods for 16S metabarcoding studies using Nanopore sequencing data. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 18, 296–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2020.01.005 (2020).
Winand, R. et al. Targeting the 16s Rrna gene for bacterial identification in complex mixed samples: Comparative evaluation of second (Illumina) and third (Oxford Nanopore Technologies) generation sequencing technologies. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21, 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21010298 (2019).
Proudman, C. J. et al. Characterisation of the faecal metabolome and microbiome of Thoroughbred racehorses. Equine Vet. J. 47, 580–586. https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.12324 (2015).
O’Donnell, M. M. et al. The core faecal bacterial microbiome of Irish Thoroughbred racehorses. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 57, 492–501. https://doi.org/10.1111/lam.12137 (2013).
Park, S. C. & Won, S. Evaluation of 16S rRNA databases for taxonomic assignments using mock community. Genom. Inform. 16, e24. https://doi.org/10.5808/GI.2018.16.4.e24 (2018).
Soergel, D. A., Dey, N., Knight, R. & Brenner, S. E. Selection of primers for optimal taxonomic classification of environmental 16S rRNA gene sequences. ISME J. 6, 1440–1444. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2011.208 (2012).
Sipos, R. et al. Effect of primer mismatch, annealing temperature and PCR cycle number on 16S rRNA gene-targetting bacterial community analysis. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 60, 341–350. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2007.00283.x (2007).
Adam, P. S., Borrel, G., Brochier-Armanet, C. & Gribaldo, S. The growing tree of Archaea: New perspectives on their diversity, evolution and ecology. ISME J. 11, 2407–2425. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2017.122 (2017).
Bahram, M., Anslan, S., Hildebrand, F., Bork, P. & Tedersoo, L. Newly designed 16S rRNA metabarcoding primers amplify diverse and novel archaeal taxa from the environment. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 11, 487–494. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-2229.12684 (2019).
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the Japan Racing Association, which provided all help in the design of the study, the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data, and writing the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Y.K. did experimental works and wrote the main manuscript. H.N., E.U.F, and T.N. reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Kinoshita, Y., Niwa, H., Uchida-Fujii, E. et al. Establishment and assessment of an amplicon sequencing method targeting the 16S-ITS-23S rRNA operon for analysis of the equine gut microbiome. Sci Rep 11, 11884 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-91425-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-91425-7
This article is cited by
-
High-throughput identification and quantification of bacterial cells in the microbiota based on 16S rRNA sequencing with single-base accuracy using BarBIQ
Nature Protocols (2024)
-
Microbiome variations among age classes and diets of captive Asian elephants (Elephas maximus) in Thailand using full-length 16S rRNA nanopore sequencing
Scientific Reports (2023)
-
A balanced gut microbiota is essential to maintain health in captive sika deer
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (2022)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.